Canon EOS R7 vs R8 vs R6: The Ultimate 2025 Mirrorless Showdown

Introduction: In the crowded world of mirrorless cameras, Canon’s EOS R7, EOS R8, and EOS R6 have emerged as three compelling options in mid-2025. Each camera targets a different segment – the EOS R7 brings pro-level speed to an APS-C sensor, the EOS R8 offers full-frame quality in a compact body, and the EOS R6 (Canon’s 2020 enthusiast workhorse) delivers well-rounded performance with pro features. If you’re shopping for a Canon mirrorless camera this year, it’s critical to understand how these models compare on specs, performance, and suitability for your needs. This in-depth report will compare key specifications (sensor, autofocus, burst shooting, IBIS, video, etc.), discuss which camera is best for wildlife, sports, portraits, travel, vlogging, and hybrid use, highlight expert review opinions and current pricing, and even touch on Canon’s latest releases (like the R5 Mark II and R1 flagship). By the end, you’ll know exactly which Canon R-series camera is right for you in 2025.

Specifications and Performance Comparison

Let’s start with a side-by-side look at the core specs of the Canon EOS R7, R8, and R6, followed by a breakdown of how those translate into real-world performance:

Sensor & Image Quality: The EOS R7’s 32.5MP APS-C sensor offers the highest resolution of the trio, which is great for cropping and detailed wildlife shots. However, being a smaller sensor, it can’t match the low-light performance and dynamic range of the full-frame R8 and R6. The R7 produces excellent images for its class – reviewers note its image quality is “great for an APS-C sensor” and comparable to competitors like the Fujifilm X-T5. But in high-contrast or low-light scenes, full-frame will retain more detail in shadows and highlights. Both the EOS R8 and EOS R6 use full-frame sensors that excel in dynamic range and noise control. The R8’s 24.2MP sensor is actually the same modern sensor as in the EOS R6 Mark II, meaning it captures “very high-quality images” with “amazing dynamic range” for the price. The older R6 has only 20MP resolution, which initially raised some eyebrows about detail, but in practice its image quality is fantastic – DPReview lauded the R6’s JPEG colors and file flexibility. Unless you require huge prints or heavy cropping, the R6’s 20MP is sufficient for most and contributes to excellent low-light performance. Overall, casual shooters will be pleased with all three – as one expert put it, “the R8’s images would please anybody” and the R7 likewise delivers high-quality output for stills and video amateurphotographer.com. If ultimate image quality and shallow depth-of-field are priorities, the full-frame R8/R6 have the edge in dynamic range and bokeh. But if you need reach or extra pixels on a budget, the R7’s high-density sensor is highly effective (its detail even rivaled some older 5D full-frame cameras in tests).

Autofocus Performance: All three cameras feature Canon’s Dual Pixel CMOS AF II system with intelligent subject recognition – a huge selling point of Canon’s R-series. The EOS R7 inherited AF algorithms from the pro-grade EOS R3, including subject tracking modes for people, animals (including birds), and vehicles. In the R7 you can engage tracking in any focus area mode, and it shoots confidently at 15fps with full AF, making it a mini sports shooter. DPReview found the R7’s AF “benefits from some of the technology introduced in the flagship EOS R3” and is more than up to the task of locking focus on fast action dpreview.com. The EOS R8 uses the same AF system as the $2500 EOS R6 Mark II, which means “absolutely superb autofocus” performance for its class. It’s trained to recognize a wide selection of subjects (people, eyes, dogs, cats, birds, horses, cars, motorcycles, etc.) and can reliably track moving targets anywhere in the frame. In fact, Petapixel noted the R8’s advanced tracking “puts [it] ahead of cameras like the Sony a7 IV…and Nikon Z6 II” in AF capability. The EOS R6, while a generation older, also has excellent autofocus – it introduced Canon’s AI-trained Dual Pixel AF II with 100% coverage and eye/face detection. Reviewers observed the R6’s AF is as good as the EOS-1D X Mark III’s in tracking (Canon’s flagship DSLR) and “does an excellent job keeping fast subjects in focus” even in challenging scenes. In short, all three cameras focus fast and accurately for both stills and video. The differences come down to usability: the R6 and R7 bodies include an AF joystick/multi-controller (the R7’s is a unique combined dial) for selecting focus points, whereas the smaller R8 lacks a physical AF joystick – you’ll rely on touch-and-drag on the rear screen or the D-pad, which works but isn’t as tactile. Also note the R8’s subject detection works great, but its lack of in-body stabilization (more on that next) can make keeping a moving subject framed slightly trickier at long focal lengths compared to the stabilized R6/R7. Nonetheless, in terms of brains, the R8 and R7 both offer Canon’s latest AF magic to confidently track eyes and animals. At their price points, the autofocus is class-leading – “fantastic” and “uncanny” in the words of reviewers. Even sports shooters are impressed: “the R7’s autofocus supports human, animal and vehicle detection and is quite effective at tracking fast-moving subjects” rtings.com, and the R6’s AF has “very reliable tracking…with subject detection for birds and animals”. No matter which model you choose, you’re getting proven Canon AF performance that greatly increases your keeper rate for action, wildlife, and portrait shots.

Continuous Shooting & Buffer: If you’re an action shooter, speed is a major differentiator in this trio. The EOS R7 can fire at up to 15 fps with its mechanical shutter, which is near pro sports camera territory (for context, Canon’s EOS-1D X Mark III DSLR did 16 fps) dpreview.com. In electronic shutter mode, the R7 reaches 30 fps bursts, though with potential rolling shutter distortion on fast motion (since its sensor isn’t stacked). Impressively, the R7’s buffer is deep enough to capture around 100 RAW shots at 15fps or 65 shots at 30fps before slowing – vastly better than the entry-level R10. This makes the R7 a mini wildlife/sports powerhouse for the price. The EOS R8, by contrast, has a simplified shutter mechanism (it lacks a fully mechanical shutter and uses electronic-first-curtain by default). This means its mechanical burst is limited to 6 fps – fine for casual action, but not in the R7/R6 league. However, the R8 can shoot 40 fps using the electronic shutter in its special RAW Burst mode (with 0.5s of pre-buffering to capture moments before you fully press the trigger). That 40 fps sounds incredible (and it can capture ~50 shots in a burst at that speed in RAW) – but note that 40 fps is fully electronic, so fast-moving subjects can show rolling shutter skew since the sensor readout isn’t as fast as a stacked pro sensor. Also, if you prefer JPEGs or need a deeper buffer, the R8’s buffer will clear slower than the R7’s due to the high data rate (one test found ~53 shots at 20fps before a brief pause). Meanwhile, the EOS R6 shoots at 12 fps mechanically and 20 fps electronically – very respectable speeds that were top-of-class in 2020. Its mechanical 12 fps is extremely reliable (no distortion), and the R6’s buffer is “very large”, allowing extended bursts without slowing down. Using the e-shutter at 20 fps, the R6 can rattle off dozens of RAWs, but like the R7, its non-stacked sensor will exhibit rolling skew on quick subjects if you use electronic mode (the R6’s readout is on the slower side, so e-shutter is best reserved for moderately fast action). One advantage of the R6/R7: both have dual card slots, so pros can shoot RAW to two cards for backup during critical high-speed bursts – the R8’s single card slot means no instant backup of that once-in-a-lifetime action shot. To summarize, for pure speed the R7 is king here (15 fps mechanical beats the others, and 30 fps e-shutter if needed), the R6 is close behind (higher-end build and buffer, 12/20 fps), and the R8, while capable of astonishing 40 fps spurts, is more limited in sustained sports use due to its 6 fps mechanical cap and smaller buffer. Still, many reviewers were shocked at the R8’s capabilities, given it can effectively match the $2500 R6 Mark II’s 40 fps burst in a smaller body. If you’re casually shooting kids, pets, or occasional sports, the R8 is no slouch. But serious action/wildlife enthusiasts will appreciate the R7’s blistering bursts and deeper buffer for tracking fast subjects without pause rtings.com.

In-Body Stabilization (IBIS): Here we see a big design difference. The EOS R7 and R6 include IBIS (In-Body Image Stabilization) that compensates for shake on all lenses, whereas the EOS R8 has no in-body stabilizer (Canon omitted it to save size, weight, and cost). The R6’s IBIS is rated up to 8 stops of shake correction (when combined with certain RF lenses) – a huge benefit for handheld shooting in low light or when using non-stabilized lenses. The R7’s IBIS is similarly robust, rated up to 7 stops improvement, and unique to the R7 is Auto-Leveling: the IBIS can automatically correct minor tilts to keep your horizon level for stills – a handy extra for landscape shooters. In practical terms, IBIS on the R7/R6 means you can use slower shutter speeds handheld without blur (great for nighttime cityscapes or motion panning). It also improves handheld video stability for static or gently moving shots. However, IBIS is not a magic gimbal – for example, DPReview found the R7’s IBIS “isn’t robust enough to smooth out footage shot while walking”, though it works well for steadying handheld pans or reducing micro-shakes. The R8, lacking IBIS, relies on optical IS in lenses or digital IS in video. Canon’s RF lenses with IS still give 3–5 stops of stabilization, and the R8’s video mode offers digital IS (with a slight crop) to iron out some movement. But if you frequently shoot in conditions that demand stabilization (e.g. twilight handheld shots, video on the move without a tripod), the R6 or R7 have a clear advantage. Notably, for vlogging, the R8’s absence of IBIS means you’ll want an IS lens or a small gimbal for best results – otherwise, footage can get choppy if you’re moving. Many users are fine with this trade-off (one photographer even remarked that for them, leaving out IBIS was acceptable to save weight, as they use fast shutter speeds or lens-IS and prefer the lighter body dpreview.com). But others consider IBIS essential in an enthusiast camera – it’s up to your shooting style. In any case, Canon has engineered these cameras so that with stabilized RF lenses, you can still get sharp results on the R8. For example, a tester noted that pairing the R8 with an IS lens, they “couldn’t tell the difference” versus an IBIS body in final images petapixel.com. Bottom line: R6 = best IS, R7 = close second with a nifty auto-level feature, R8 = no IBIS (plan accordingly).

Video Capabilities: All three cameras shoot excellent video, but each has its limits. The EOS R7 can record UHD 4K up to 60p, leveraging its high-res sensor for oversampled quality. At 4K 30p and below, the R7 uses the full 7K sensor width oversampled to 4K for very crisp footage. This oversampled 4K “Fine” mode produces detailed results “up there with the best APS-C cameras” – great for professional-looking travel videos or YouTube. The trade-off is that 4K 60p on the R7 is not oversampled; by default it’s line-skipped (full width) and a bit softer, or you can enable a 1.81× additional crop for more detailed 4K60 (using only a 3840×2160 central region). That latter mode gives sharper 60p but at an effective ~2.9× total crop factor (1.6× APS-C 1.81× digital) – great if you need extra telephoto reach, not great for wide-angle scenes. The R7 supports 10-bit recording in two flavors: Canon Log 3 for grading, or HDR PQ for direct HDR output. It also has no 30-minute clip limit in most modes and no significant overheating in standard modes – users report it can record long sessions (it even has no thermal limit for the cropped/line-skipped 4K60). In fact, R7 is praised as a “fantastic machine for self-documentation” (vlogging) given its flip screen, face/eye AF, and mic/headphone ports. Its weak point for video is rolling shutter: the oversampled 4K mode has a 30ms readout, so fast pans cause noticeable “jello” wobble. The subsampled/cropped modes have faster ~15ms readout, so less skew. Essentially, R7 video is best for stationary or slower-moving shots where detail is priority; for fast action, you might switch to the cropped mode or 1080p to minimize distortion. The EOS R8 is arguably the most video-focused of the three. It can do full-width 4K up to 60p without any crop, by oversampling from 6K*. This means beautifully detailed 4K at 24/30/60p with no field of view loss – a big advantage over the cropped 4K60 on R7 and the older tech on R6. Like the R7, the R8 records 10-bit internally (Canon Log 3 or HDR PQ) for high dynamic range footage. It also offers up to 1080/180p slow-motion (the R6 and R7 top out at 1080/120p). In practice, reviewers have lauded the R8’s video: it captures “excellent-quality video” with support for Log for advanced color grading, and its AF during video is fantastic at tracking subjects. Another bonus: the R8 has no 30-minute clip limit on video. Thanks to improvements since 2020, it can record until your card fills or battery dies. That said, the R8’s Achilles’ heel for video is battery life and heat. The small LP-E17 battery drains fast – expect maybe ~30-45 minutes of 4K per charge, so spares or USB power are a must for long shoots. And while Canon doesn’t list strict overheating limits, the R8’s tiny body can get warm. In testing, recording 4K60 in summer sun can trigger heat warnings after some tens of minutes. For most casual use or short clips, it’s fine, but if you plan to do extended takes or documentary-style recording, the R8 may require workarounds (external cooling or pauses). By contrast, the EOS R6 (original) was known for overheating limitations: it shoots oversampled 4K (from 5.1K) up to 30p and 4K60 with a minor crop, but in warm conditions it could overheat after ~30 minutes of 4K30 or ~20 minutes of 4K60, and it mandatorily stops at 29:59 due to the old recording limit. Firmware updates have improved the R6’s record times a bit, but it’s still not a camera for all-day 4K filming. On the positive side, the R6 records beautiful 10-bit 4:2:2 video (Canon Log or HDR PQ) and even has an ALL-I 120fps 1080p for slow-motion. Its IBIS is a boon for steady footage, and it has useful video tools like zebras and false color (after firmware). Video quality from the R6 is “very attractive” and its oversampled 4K is crisp dpreview.com – if you stay within time limits. The R6 also has both mic and headphone jacks (as do R7 and R8), and a full-size HDMI port (the R7 and R8 use micro HDMI). Overall, for hybrid shooters who do serious video, the EOS R8’s uncropped 4K60 and latest AF make it the strongest of the three – it essentially offers the R6 Mark II’s video prowess in a $1,500 body, which was unheard of a couple years ago. The R7 is no slouch either, especially if you need long record times or want that extra reach (its 4K is detailed and it never overheated in tests). Just remember the crop and rolling shutter drawbacks. The R6 can certainly produce pro-quality footage (many wedding shooters used R6’s 4K30 and 1080p), but by 2025 its limitations are more apparent – if video is your main focus, the R8 or an R6 Mark II will serve you better.

Design, Viewfinder & Battery: The physical build and handling of these cameras differ to fit their target users. The EOS R6 is the most “pro” in feel – it has a solid weather-sealed magnesium alloy build (comparable to a 6D-series DSLR) dpreview.com, a generous handgrip, and intuitive controls including dual command dials and an AF joystick. It’s also the heaviest at 680g (1.5 lbs) with battery. The EOS R7 in contrast weighs about 612g, with a slightly smaller but still comfortable grip. It is also weather-sealed to a degree similar to the Canon 90D (prosumer DSLR) – good for dusty or damp conditions (a big plus for outdoor wildlife use). The R7 lacks a top LCD panel (the R6 doesn’t have one either, only the R5 does) and its control layout is unique: Canon gave it a combined rear control wheel + joystick near the thumb rest petapixel.com. Some love this stacked controller for quick adjustments; others find it “not good or bad – just different” and note it can take time to get used to petapixel.com. The R7 has two control dials (front and rear) and plenty of customizable buttons, though Canon oddly restricted some customization options in firmware (a quirk noted in reviews). Meanwhile, the EOS R8 is extremely lightweight (461g) and compact – it’s Canon’s lightest full-frame RF body to date. Essentially, the R8 uses the small body of the earlier EOS RP, meaning limited space for controls. It has only one main control dial plus a rear wheel on the d-pad, no joystick, and no mode dial (instead a mode switch and combined power toggle, which some found fiddly). The build is mostly polycarbonate and not weather-sealed – in fact, RTINGS notes the R8’s build “is just decent, with no weather-sealing”. It feels a bit plasticky in hand, appropriate for its entry-level positioning. That said, many users appreciate how small and travel-friendly the R8 is – you can carry it all day or put it on a lightweight gimbal with ease (one pro noted the R8 + a DJI RS3 Mini gimbal is a perfect pairing). For viewfinders, the R6 offers the best EVF: a 3.69-million-dot OLED with 0.76× magnification, providing a sharper and larger view than the others. The R7 and R8 both use a 2.36M-dot OLED EVF (0.70×). These are perfectly usable, but some users coming from high-end cameras or optical viewfinders will notice the lower resolution and smaller size. In fact, the R7’s EVF was called “noticeably low quality for a 2022 release” by one reviewer – likely because competitors like the X-T4 had 3.7M-dot finders. Still, unless you do a side-by-side comparison, the R7/R8 EVF gets the job done for composition and tracking. All three have a fully-articulating 3.0-inch rear touchscreen (approximately 1.62M-dot resolution) – great for vloggers or shooting at odd angles. For storage, as mentioned, the R6 and R7 have dual UHS-II SD card slots for instant backup or segregating JPEG/RAW. The R8 has a single UHS-II slot, which is common at its price but means no redundancy. Finally, battery life: The R6 and R7 use the larger LP-E6NH battery, whereas the R8 uses the smaller LP-E17. This leads to dramatic differences in stamina. The R7 can shoot 500–770 shots per charge (LCD vs EVF) per CIPA rating, and testers often exceed that – one report got 900+ photos with ~30% remaining. The R6 is rated ~380 shots (EVF); in practice around 500 shots is achievable. The R8’s CIPA rating is only 220 (EVF) to 370 (LCD) shots – and reviewers confirm its endurance is “worst-in-class”, calling it the camera’s “Achilles’ heel”. In field use, anything intensive (burst shooting, video recording, Wi-Fi use) drains the R8 quickly – spare batteries or a USB PD power bank are essential for extended outings. It’s not uncommon for R8 users to carry 2-3 spares for a full day shoot. This is a clear downside of the R8’s ultra-light design. By contrast, R7 owners love its efficient battery usage – “the R7’s battery puts the R8 to absolute shame, providing up to 660 shots on a charge”. In summary, if you prioritize a rugged build, ergonomic grip, and long battery life, the EOS R6 (and R7 to a slightly lesser extent) stand out. The EOS R8 prioritizes compactness and simplicity at the cost of battery and weather sealing. None of these are poorly built, but they align with their price points: the R6 feels pro-level reliable, the R7 enthusiast-durable, and the R8 consumer-travel-friendly.

Summary of Performance: Each camera here is a strong performer in its own way, which is why this comparison is so interesting. The EOS R7 is like an APS-C mini-1D – it boasts high speed, high resolution, and advanced AF in a smaller package, making it one of Canon’s best APS-C cameras ever (one reviewer went as far as calling the R7 “one of the best cameras Canon makes” petapixel.com). Its limitations (APS-C noise in low light, EVF resolution, limited lens selection natively) are the flipside of its affordable price and feature-rich design. The EOS R8 is an entry-level full-frame with high-end guts, giving you stunning image quality, class-leading autofocus, and 4K60 video in a lightweight body. It is arguably the best full-frame camera for under $1500 in 2025. As PetaPixel’s review declared, “It takes the best features of the R6 Mark II and puts them into an affordable, comfortable body — albeit with some sacrifices to keep price and size down.” petapixel.com Those sacrifices (no IBIS, weaker battery, single card) mean the R8 isn’t for everyone, but for many it hits a sweet spot. Finally, the EOS R6, though a 2020 model, remains a superb all-rounder for serious photographers – DPReview awarded it Gold, praising that “it offers excellent image quality, shoots at high speeds and includes impressive image stabilization… a superb photographer’s camera.” dpreview.com It’s the safest choice for reliability and balance, but being older, it lacks the latest sensor and video advancements that its two newer siblings enjoy. In the next sections, we’ll break down which camera is best suited for different uses and users, dive into real-world feedback from experts, and look at value and upgrade options.

Which Camera for Which Purpose? (Use-Case Scenarios)

Choosing between the R7, R8, and R6 becomes easier when you consider what you primarily shoot. Each camera has strengths that make it ideal for certain genres:

Wildlife and Sports Photography

For wildlife, birding, and fast action, the Canon EOS R7 is often considered the top choice. Its 32.5MP APS-C sensor gives a 1.6× crop advantage – effectively turning a 400mm lens into a 640mm field of view, which is hugely beneficial for distant subjects. Plus, the R7’s 15 fps mechanical shutter and deep buffer let you capture the exact moment of a bird’s takeoff or a fast play in sports dpreview.com. The R7 was positioned as the mirrorless successor to Canon’s 7D Mark II (a legendary APS-C wildlife DSLR) and lives up to that legacy – “a dream for photographers and hybrid shooters who don’t need a full-frame sensor,” offering high resolution and responsive AF tracking in a relatively affordable package. Review testing confirms the R7 is “excellent for sports and wildlife photography. It has a very quick burst rate and a fairly large buffer… Its autofocus…is quite effective at tracking fast-moving subjects.” rtings.com The only downsides are the APS-C sensor’s lesser high-ISO performance (wildlife often involves dawn/dusk shooting) and that extremely fast subjects may show some rolling shutter if you use the 30fps e-shutter mode. But with mechanical 15fps, that’s rarely an issue. The EOS R6 is another superb option for action – especially if you often shoot in low light. Its full-frame sensor, though only 20MP, has excellent high ISO capability and the camera achieves “fantastic image quality” with low noise even at high ISOs. Sports shooters will appreciate the R6’s robust build (it can take some rain or rough use on the sidelines) and dual card slots for backup. The R6’s burst of 12fps (or 20fps electronic) and “very reliable tracking AF” mean it can certainly keep up with moving subjects. In fact, one rating put the R6’s sports photography score at 80/100, calling it “a great fit for shooting sports”. The main reason to choose R6 over R7 for wildlife/sports would be if you need the better low-light performance or already own large full-frame telephoto lenses (to fully utilize their field of view). Also, pro sports/wildlife shooters might favor the R6 for its bigger buffer and dual slots (no risk of missing a shot due to a card error). What about the EOS R8 for wildlife? The R8 can certainly be used for action – it has the same phenomenal AF system as the R6 Mark II, and its electronic shutter can rip at 40fps if you’re really trying to capture the exact wing position of a hummingbird! However, the R8 is a bit less ideal for heavy action use because of its limited 6fps mechanical shutter (you’ll likely rely on e-shutter, which as noted can skew moving subjects) and its more modest buffer depth. That said, in good light the R8’s image quality will beat the R7’s (no contest in high ISO noise or dynamic range), and it does have subject tracking for animals and birds that is on par with the R7’s. If you’re a casual wildlife shooter or you primarily photograph larger, slower animals, the R8 will do a great job. But for fast birds in flight or erratic action, most experts lean toward the R7 as the better tool – it’s sturdier, with longer battery life for all-day hikes, a telephoto boost from the crop sensor, and that blazing mechanical shutter. As one wildlife shooter on Canon’s forum put it: “For wildlife… the R7 would likely be my choice” due to the reach and resolution, whereas the full-frame models would demand much more expensive lenses for the same reach community.usa.canon.com. In summary: R7 = best for dedicated wildlife/sports, R6 = great for pro/low-light action, R8 = capable for casual action but not purpose-built for it.

Portraits and Weddings (People Photography)

Portrait shooters often gravitate to full-frame cameras for their ability to produce shallow depth of field and superb low-light performance. Here the EOS R8 and R6 have an edge over the R7. The R8’s 24MP full-frame sensor paired with a nice prime lens can yield gorgeous bokeh and subject isolation that an APS-C sensor (like the R7’s) would need a much faster lens to mimic. Additionally, the R8/R6’s superior dynamic range helps in high-contrast lighting (e.g. a bride’s white dress and dark suit in the sun). Between R8 and R6, it depends on your shooting scenario. For professional wedding or event photography, the EOS R6 is the safer bet: it has dual card slots (critical for instant backup of precious shots), a larger buffer for ceremony burst sequences, longer battery life, and IBIS which can help in dim churches or reception halls when using slow shutter speeds on non-IS primes. The R6 is also weather-sealed, so a bit of rain during an outdoor shoot won’t stop the show. In fact, many wedding photographers adopted the R6 on release and loved its silent electronic shutter (for quiet moments) and reliable face/eye detect AF in tricky lighting. As DPReview noted, the R6 may not have the highest resolution, “but it’s a superb photographer’s camera” dpreview.com – and in the wedding world, its 20MP files are still plenty for large albums and prints. The EOS R8, on the other hand, could work as a primary camera for many wedding and event photographers if used carefully. Petapixel’s review even stated the R8 is “a terrific second camera for the pro and could even work as a primary camera for many wedding and event photographers” petapixel.com. Its image quality and AF are certainly up to the task – your portraits will be tack-sharp with beautiful colors and background blur. But you’d have to manage the R8’s limitations: no backup card (so you’d shoot to a single SD – some pros are okay with this risk, others not), and poor battery life (plan to swap batteries at every lull). For portrait sessions or studio work, the R8 is fabulous – lightweight and delivers the full-frame look on a budget. For once-in-a-lifetime events, you just need to be mindful of its constraints. The EOS R7 can absolutely do portrait work too – its 32.5MP give plenty of detail for retouching, and with a fast RF lens (like the RF 50mm f/1.8 or RF 85mm f/2) you can still get nicely blurred backgrounds. It even has an advantage of deeper depth of field at equivalent framing, which can be useful if you want more of a group in focus. And remember, the R7 has eye-detect AF and even a popup flash (useful fill light in a pinch for casual portraits). However, the R7’s APS-C sensor will show more noise at high ISO if you’re in dim light, and you won’t get quite as creamy a bokeh as full-frame for individual portraits. For professional portraitists, full-frame is typically preferred, making the R8 or R6 the go-to. Enthusiast portrait shooters on a budget might start with the R7 + a nice lens, and indeed many do – but if portraits are your primary art, the extra pop from full-frame (and the lens selection of fast RF glass) tilts in favor of the R8/R6. In terms of color and skin tones, all three cameras share Canon’s renowned color science, so you can achieve beautiful results with any of them (and shoot 10-bit HDR portraits if needed on R7/R8/R6 for extra grading flexibility). One more consideration: the R6 (and R7) have the advantage of IBIS for hand-holding slower shutter speeds in low light portraits (say you want to drag the shutter for ambient light in a reception portrait – the R6’s IBIS can keep the image sharp at 1/15s, which the R8 might blur without support). Also, the R6’s larger EVF can be more pleasant for hours of portrait shooting. Bottom line: For paid or serious people photography, R6 wins on reliability and stability. The R8 wins on image quality per dollar (great for portrait enthusiasts or as a second body). The R7 can certainly do the job and even excels for environmental or telephoto portraits (its effective focal length boost turns a 85mm into ~136mm, great for candid distance shots), but it’s a step behind in low-light and background blur capability.

Travel and Vlogging

When it comes to travel photography – where you value portability, versatility, and maybe some vlogging/video – the Canon EOS R8 shines. Its biggest selling point is that it’s light and compact without sacrificing full-frame image quality. Weighing just 461g, the R8 won’t strain your neck or bag while trekking through cities or hiking trails. Reviewers specifically praised the R8 for travel: “The Canon R8 is great for travel photography. It’s relatively lightweight and portable for a full-frame camera… and has a very effective autofocus system”. That means whether you’re shooting landscapes, street candids, or family snapshots on vacation, the R8 is easy to carry and quick to focus on the moment. Its only travel downsides are lack of weather sealing (be cautious in dusty or wet environments – maybe bring a rain cover or dry bag) and the notorious battery life. Carrying a USB-C power bank or a couple spare batteries will solve the latter and is a small price to pay for the R8’s comfort. Another huge perk for travel/vlog use: the R8’s uncropped 4K60 video and fully articulating screen. You can record yourself in 4K with a wide lens and not worry about any crop factor – perfect for handheld vlogging or creative angles. The autofocus will keep your face in focus reliably. If you pair the R8 with a compact lens like the RF 16mm f/2.8 or RF 24-50mm kit lens, you have a very travel-friendly vlog setup. Again, you’ll want either a lens with IS or to use digital IS (which crops slightly) to stabilize walk-and-talk footage, since the R8 lacks IBIS. Many vloggers use a small gimbal or just a GorillaPod with the R8 and love the results. The EOS R7 is also a fine travel camera, especially if your trip involves wildlife or telephoto shooting (safari, birding, etc.) where the APS-C reach and faster burst can be useful. It’s a bit larger/heavier than the R8, but still manageable for travel. The R7’s advantage is its weather-sealed body – you can be more confident in rugged conditions. It also has much longer battery life, which is a big plus if you’re out from dawn to dusk away from charging. For vlogging, the R7’s 4K30 is super detailed (no crop), but if you need 4K60 you’ll either accept a quality drop (line-skipped full width) or a heavy crop – not ideal for hand-held vlogging because your lens might not be wide enough after the crop. And as noted, walking footage with R7’s IBIS can still be a bit bouncy (IBIS helps but isn’t perfect). If your travel is mainly still photos and occasional videos, the R7 will reward you with great images and endurance. But if you’re a hybrid creator who prioritizes video blogging on the go, the R8’s full-frame look and simpler 4K workflow may suit you better. Lastly, consider the EOS R6 for travel only if you don’t mind the weight. Some travelers do prefer the R6 because of its sturdiness and IBIS – for example, if you plan on doing night street photography or hand-held low light shots of cityscapes, the R6 can capture sharp images without a tripod thanks to stabilization and good high ISO performance. The R6 also has no real video crop at 4K30 and can do 4K60 (with a small crop) for b-roll, but remembering its 30-min limit and heat concerns, it’s not the best for extensive travel vlogging. One RTings review commented, “If you don’t mind a bulkier kit, the R6 is good for travel photography… it captures very high-quality images and has great battery life for a mirrorless model”. So, the R6 is certainly capable for travel, especially if photography is your main goal and you want the top image quality in varying conditions. Just be ready for the added heft in your bag. In summary: Travel/vlog priority -> R8 for its blend of quality and compactness (just pack extra batteries). Travel with lots of nature or long-lens shooting -> R7, for its reach and battery endurance. Travel with emphasis on low-light cityscapes or just a preference for a beefier camera -> R6, if you’re okay carrying it.

Landscape and Architecture

For static subjects like landscapes, cityscapes, and architecture, all three cameras are more than capable, but a few points to consider: The EOS R7’s 32.5MP resolution can be an asset for capturing fine detail in landscapes. In good light at base ISO, it produces wonderfully detailed files and you have extra pixels to crop or print large. However, the R7’s APS-C sensor has slightly less dynamic range than the full-frames, meaning in very high-contrast scenes (say bright clouds and dark foreground) the R8/R6 will retain more highlight and shadow detail in a single exposure. If you’re in the habit of bracketing exposures or using grad ND filters, the difference is negligible. The EOS R8 with its 24MP full-frame sensor offers excellent dynamic range and color depth – “amazing dynamic range” as one review put it – making it a great choice for landscapes, especially if you do post-processing where that flexibility helps recover sky and shadow details. The R8 is also lighter to hike with, though keep in mind it’s not weather-sealed if you’re out in the elements. The EOS R6 has the lowest resolution (20MP), but its files have “remarkably wide dynamic range” and “great noise handling in low light,” which landscape photographers appreciate for dawn/sunset shoots. If you don’t need giant prints, the R6’s images are gorgeous and very clean. Plus, the R6’s IBIS allows you to do things like handheld bracketed HDR shots or handheld long exposures (to a point) – for example, you might handhold the R6 at 1/4 second to blur a waterfall if you have steady hands, which would be harder with the R8 (no IBIS) without a tripod. The R7 also has IBIS to assist with handheld shots (and its auto-level could help if you often find crooked horizons). One more factor: lens selection for landscapes. With the R8/R6’s full-frame, you can use Canon’s excellent RF L-series ultra-wide lenses (15-35mm, 14-35mm, etc.) to maximum effect. On the R7, you either adapt EF lenses or use the RF-S 18-150mm or RF-S 15-45mm (which are okay, but not L quality). The R7 effectively turns any EF/RF lens into a narrower view (1.6× crop), so wide vistas are a bit tougher to capture – the widest native option is the RF-S 18-45 (which is equivalent ~29mm, not very wide). So for serious landscape folks who love ultra-wide perspectives, full-frame (R8/R6) is advantageous. For architecture, similarly, the full-frame field of view and dynamic range can be helpful, and if you plan to use Canon’s TS-E tilt-shift lenses (via adapter for now, since RF tilt-shifts aren’t out yet), those are designed for full-frame. All in all, landscape photographers might lean towards the R8 for its combination of image quality and lighter weight, or the R6 if they value IBIS and weather-sealing more and are okay with 20MP. The R7 will do a great job too – especially if you stop down and shoot from a tripod, you’ll get crisp images – just know its limitations with dynamic range (which you can often overcome by multi-exposure blending if needed).

Video and Hybrid Shooting (Stills+Video)

If you consider yourself a hybrid shooter – someone who needs to switch between capturing high-quality stills and high-quality video frequently – the EOS R8 is arguably the best fit among these three. It truly delivers on both fronts: 24MP full-frame stills (the same quality as a $2.5k R6 Mark II, which one might call pro-level) and oversampled 4K60 video with advanced AF, all in one package. There’s a reason many content creators are excited about the R8 – it lowers the cost of entry for professional-looking video significantly. As one YouTuber pointed out, “the R8 shoots 4K 60p with no crop and 10-bit 4:2:2…very high bit depth and color – a big deal for hybrid shooters”. The main caution for hybrid use is, again, battery life – filming will chew through batteries, so plan accordingly. The EOS R7 is a close second for hybrid use. It offers the convenience of no clip length limit and has features like 10-bit Log, dual card slots (you could dedicate one card to video, one to photos, etc.), and even the option to grab 32MP frame grabs from 4K video (Canon promoted a “Frame Grab” feature after firmware which lets you pull an 8MP still – note: a true 32MP still from 4K is not possible since 4K frame is ~8MP, so possibly a misunderstanding in some blog). The R7’s weaker points for video are the rolling shutter (so you’d avoid quick pans or use the cropped mode for fast action) and lack of standard wide-angle options due to crop – but if you’re a photographer who occasionally needs to record longer videos (interviews, lectures, etc.), the R7 is reliable and produces sharp footage. Its “impressive battery life” means it can record longer without swapping power, and it doesn’t overheat. Many wildlife photographers, for example, love the R7 for grabbing high-quality video of animals when needed, then immediately shooting bursts of stills – all with one camera. The EOS R6, while a stellar stills camera, is the least convenient for modern hybrid work due to its recording limit and potential overheating. It’s fine if you just need short video clips occasionally. But if you anticipate frequently switching between shooting a bunch of stills and then rolling video for 10+ minutes, the R6 might frustrate you with warnings or shut-offs on hot days. The R6 Mark II fixed a lot of that, but the original R6 remains a “stills-first” design. One bright spot: the R6’s IBIS and robust body make it great for handheld video snippets; for example, wedding photographers might grab some quick 4K clips of the venue or couple and the R6 will handle that nicely in C-Log, as long as it’s not too prolonged. But for dedicated hybrid shooters on a budget, the R8 offers the most seamless experience – essentially giving you an R6 II-lite. It was even named “Best camera for under $1500” in some buying guides. And if your budget is a bit higher and you do 50/50 stills-video professionally, you might consider the R6 Mark II or even the R5, but within our trio, the R8 is the hybrid king.

Price, Value, and Market Pricing (August 2025)

One of the most important factors is value for money. As of August 2025, here’s how the pricing shakes out:

• Canon EOS R7: Originally launched at $1,499 body-only, the R7 now typically retails around $1,299 new (body) after some price drops. In fact, Canon’s official store often has instant savings (e.g. $100 off) bringing it to that price. Some authorized dealers and holiday sales have even seen it as low as $1,149 (as one user spotted at a retailer). On the used market, a mint R7 runs roughly $1,000–$1,100, making it quite the bargain for what you get. The price-to-performance of the R7 is excellent if you need its specific strengths – you’re getting a mini sports camera and high-res stills for nearly half the cost of a full-frame body. Its closest competitors, like the Fujifilm X-T5 (40MP APS-C) or Sony A6600, are either more expensive or older tech. So the R7 is a high-value choice especially for wildlife and action enthusiasts not wanting to spend full-frame money.
• Canon EOS R8: The R8 launched at $1,499 as well, body-only. By mid/late 2025, its price new is hovering around $1,299 (frequently on sale for $1,299, or $1,499 with a kit lens). Unlike the R7, the R8 is newer and extremely popular, so it hasn’t dropped much further – but even at $1.3k it’s an incredible value. Consider that the R8’s full-frame sensor and AF performance are essentially matching a $2,500 camera from a year prior (R6 Mark II). Many reviews dubbed the R8 a top pick for budget full-frame. For instance, it’s featured as “Best bargain full-frame” in buying guides. The compromises (battery, build) are acceptable to a lot of shooters given the image quality on tap. If you’re deciding between R7 and R8 purely on image/video quality for the dollar, the R8 gives you that full-frame goodness at a very aggressive price – Canon clearly aimed to undercut rivals. A Nikon Z5 is around $1,400 but has far inferior video and AF, and Sony’s older A7 III still sits around $1,700 new. So the R8 at ~$1,299 is arguably the best full-frame value on the market in 2025. Used R8 bodies are still rare but typically go for ~$1,100–$1,200 (people tend to hold onto this gem).
• Canon EOS R6: The R6 launched at $2,499 in 2020. After the R6 Mark II came out (late 2022), Canon discontinued the original R6. New stock of R6 is hard to find in 2025, except maybe some remaining kits or refurbs. The R6 Mark II took over the $2,500 slot. However, on the used market the EOS R6 is now a fantastic deal. As of 2025, used R6 bodies in good condition often sell for around $1,400–$1,600 (sometimes even less). One camera gear site noted “its $2,499 price tag put it out of reach in 2020, but today the pre-owned market has dropped this camera into a price range that feels almost too good to be true — $1,500 or even lower”. Indeed, for ~$1,500 you can get a lightly used pro-grade R6, which they call “Affordable Excellence…a budget-friendly gem when bought used in 2025”. This makes the R6 a tempting alternative to a new R7 or R8 if you value its build and features. You’d be getting full-frame + IBIS + dual slots at roughly the same cost. Of course, buying used means no warranty and the camera is older tech (20MP, risk of shutter count, etc.), but many folks are jumping on R6’s in the second-hand market. If you prefer new and want something like the R6, you’d be looking at the EOS R6 Mark II, which is around $2,300 in mid-2025 (it had a slight price dip from $2,499). But that’s well above the R7/R8 price bracket.

In terms of price-to-performance ratio:

• The EOS R7 gives you features (speed, dual slots, high res) that no other camera around $1,300 offers, if you don’t mind APS-C. It’s a better value than Canon’s own cheaper R10/R50 if you need those high-end features. For someone with ~$1,300 to spend and a focus on wildlife or action, the R7 might yield more keeper shots than an R8 + cheaper lenses, because you can invest the savings in a telephoto lens (and the crop factor reduces lens cost for reach). It’s also worth noting you might save on lenses with R7 if you already have some EF-S glass (adapting is an option).
• The EOS R8 brings full-frame to the masses. If your budget is $1,300 and your priority is general photography/videography with the best image quality, the R8 likely offers the highest image quality per dollar of any new camera in Canon’s lineup. As one expert succinctly put it, “you get a lot of camera for your money in the EOS R8” dpreview.com. It was even cited as a top pick under $1500 precisely for that reason. The only caveat is you might need to budget a bit more for extra batteries (or the $99 battery grip extension that fits the RP/R8 for better handling, though it doesn’t add capacity). But those added costs are minor.
• The EOS R6 (original) still holds its own in value, especially used. At used ~$1,500, it undercuts many new cameras that don’t even have its feature set. For example, a new Sony A7 IV is ~$2,400; a Nikon Z6 II ~$2,000; even Canon’s own R6 Mark II is ~$2,300. So if you can find a well-maintained R6 for $1,400, that’s a steal – you’re getting a weather-sealed, dual-slot, IBIS, 20fps machine for essentially the price of an R8. No surprise, a blog on GearFocus argued that “the Canon R6, a pro-grade camera, is rewriting the rules for budget-conscious creators” now that it’s about 30-40% of its original price. The R6 is a great value for those who don’t need the latest sensor and are okay with 20MP. It’s especially appealing if you already have some Canon RF or EF lenses and want to step into mirrorless without breaking the bank on an R5 or R6 Mark II. The risk of course is buying used – ensure the shutter count isn’t too high and the unit’s been cared for (the R6 shutter is rated for ~300k actuations, so plenty of life in most used ones).

In summary, all three cameras offer strong value, but to different buyers. The R8 provides the most “wow” for general users – full-frame performance at an entry-ish price. The R7 provides the most niche value – if you specifically need its high-speed APS-C abilities, there’s nothing else like it near the price (and certainly nothing from Canon’s competitors with that blend of speed and resolution in APS-C). The R6 (used) can be a clever way to get a more professional body at a mid-range price – great for enthusiasts stepping up from older DSLRs who want something lasting and reliable for semi-pro work without going to R5 levels of spend.

One more aspect of value: lenses and system costs. The R7 might seem cheaper, but remember you may need longer focal length lenses (or high-quality EF-s mount lenses adapted) to take advantage of it – Canon’s RF-S lens lineup is still limited (mostly kit zooms). The R8/R6 being full-frame have access to the entire RF lens range natively (though many RF lenses, especially L series, are pricey). If you’re on a tight budget, the R7 paired with affordable EF or RF-S lenses can be a very cost-effective kit (e.g. an R7 plus a $400 EF 70-300mm can do wildlife for far less than an R8 plus a $800 RF 100-400mm, albeit with some quality differences). On the other hand, the R8 with just a 50mm f/1.8 can outshine the R7 in portraiture easily. So consider lens investment in your overall value equation.

Expert Opinions and Reviews

What are experts and reviewers saying about these cameras? Let’s look at a few notable quotes and evaluations from reputable sources:

• Canon EOS R7: “Whether you’re looking for a camera for stills or video, the high-speed and high-quality output of the R7 certainly make for an appealing camera.” — Amateur Photographer (Josh Waller) amateurphotographer.com. The R7 has generally impressed reviewers with its speed, resolution, and price. PetaPixel called it “one of the best cameras Canon makes,” noting it takes a lot of Canon’s flagship tech and offers it at a tempting price petapixel.com. DPReview’s team praised the R7 as a strong hybrid APS-C camera that produces great image quality and “jaw-dropping” burst rates. They did critique some handling quirks (like the combined joystick-wheel and average EVF), but in conclusion DPReview said “Yes. Overall, the Canon EOS R7 is successful at nearly everything it’s trying to be… it’s still very much an excellent camera.”. Wildlife and sports specialists on forums have lauded the R7’s autofocus – one Reddit user described the eye AF as “beyond magic” compared to previous cameras. The main reservation in reviews is the limited RF-S lens ecosystem and the APS-C sensor’s noise performance (especially compared to full-frame). But as a total package, the R7 is frequently recommended for action, wildlife, and even as a backup body for pros.
• Canon EOS R8: The R8 has been getting rave reviews as well. Amateur Photographer’s verdict highlights that “although the EOS R8 is not aimed at advanced users, its images would please anybody. At the price, the autofocus is class-leading. Build and handling are sub-optimal, though.” This nicely sums it up: image quality and AF punch above its class, but you do make concessions in body and controls. DPReview gave the R8 an 87% score (Silver Award) and noted it “adds plenty of Canon’s latest advancements from the R6 Mark II to a more compact, affordable body”. In their review they compliment its “excellent 24MP sensor…usable face/eye detection…decent 4K capture” and called it “a camera that’s highly competitive, the best bargain full-frame” in its segment. PetaPixel’s David Schloss titled his review “The Best Full-Frame Canon for Most People”, writing “It takes the best features of the R6 Mark II and puts them into an affordable, comfortable, and functional body — albeit one with some sacrifices.” petapixel.com He was impressed that the R8 can serve both upgraders and even pros in some scenarios, concluding it’s an “excellent choice” for those moving up towards higher models. Many YouTubers and bloggers have echoed that sentiment: the R8 is considered a sweet spot for hobbyists who want full-frame quality without the cost or complexity of pro bodies. The criticisms are consistent: battery life (“bring spares!”), lack of IBIS, and the one-card limitation for critical work. But as a popular camera store slogan puts it, the R8 is basically “an R6 Mark II’s guts for $1000 less”, which is hard not to love.
• Canon EOS R6: The original R6, when reviewed in 2020, also received a lot of praise. DPReview gave it a Gold Award with 90%, stating “The EOS R6 has a lot going for it: it offers excellent image quality, shoots at high speeds and includes impressive image stabilization. It’s not the best stills-and-video option, but it’s a superb photographer’s camera.” dpreview.com That quote underlines that even in 2020 they saw video as a bit hampered by overheating, but purely for photography the R6 was top-notch. Photography Blog commended its autofocus and 12fps bursts, but questioned if 20MP was enough for all users (for some it was a drawback, for others not an issue). Over time, many reviewers updated their stance after firmware improvements: the R6 got Canon Log3 and slightly better record times via updates, making it more well-rounded. In 2025, some bloggers do retrospective “Still worth it?” pieces: A common conclusion is that the R6 remains a fantastic buy for serious shooters if you don’t need the latest resolution or if you can snag it at a discount. One YouTube photographer said in early 2025, “the R6 is a dream to shoot with…a fantastic investment for any serious photographer or videographer. Highly recommended!”. Real-world user reviews mention the R6’s eye AF and 20fps electronic as reasons they love it for wildlife and action, often saying it transformed their yield of in-focus shots with moving subjects. The camera’s 8-stop IBIS also garners praise – many attest that it’s a game changer for handheld shooting. Critiques that linger: the resolution (some landscape or commercial shooters want more than 20MP), and the video limitations in an age where new cameras (like the R8) have no record limit and better thermal management. But many outlets and forums in 2025 explicitly mention the R6 as a “used bargain” or great second-hand pick-up for those who want pro features without a pro price.

Overall, the expert consensus is very positive for all three models, each in their context. The R7 is lauded for bringing flagship APS-C performance to enthusiast price, the R8 is celebrated as an astoundingly capable full-frame entry model, and the R6 is respected as a workhorse camera that has proven itself in the field. It’s telling that as of 2025, if you ask “which Canon camera should I get under $1500?”, many experts will answer: “If you want full-frame, go R8. If you shoot wildlife/action, consider R7. If you can stretch a bit or find used, the R6 (or R6 II) is fantastic.” There’s no outright “bad” choice here – it truly depends on your needs.

Firmware Updates and Enhancements (2023–2025)

Canon has been actively updating these cameras with firmware improvements, some of which add new features or fix initial quirks:

• EOS R7 Firmware: Since launch, the R7 has seen multiple firmware updates (reaching v1.7.1 by July 2025). Early updates (v1.2.0, v1.3.0 in 2023) brought notable autofocus enhancements. For example, firmware 1.3.0 (Oct 2023) improved subject tracking, eye detection, and low-light focusing. Canon addressed some user-reported issues like AF point jumping and focus hunting. One detailed report noted “enhanced AI subject detection offering faster, more reliable tracking, particularly in challenging lighting…refined eye-detection algorithm works at greater distances and maintains focus more consistently when subjects turn their heads”. This kind of update was a boon to R7 wildlife shooters, making the camera stick to erratic subjects even better than at launch. Firmware 1.5.0 in mid-2024 fixed some operational bugs (e.g. a bug where the shutter would continue firing in rare cases when using back-button focus). The latest 1.7.x firmwares incorporate security improvements (network/Wi-Fi protocols) and support for new lenses. In essence, the R7 you buy now likely performs even better than it did at release, thanks to these updates. Canon has shown commitment to polishing the R7’s AF and functionality, which owners have appreciated (each update was greeted with detailed testing on forums, and generally positive feedback about improved AF stickiness and even some new options in menus).
• EOS R8 Firmware: The R8 reached firmware v1.5.0 by mid-2025. Early firmware (v1.1, 1.2 in 2023) fixed minor bugs (like HDMI output quirks) and added compatibility for new RF lenses. A notable development in 2024 was Canon offering a paid firmware upgrade for certain models including the R8 to add specific features – one was a “cropping/frame guide” feature for video. Canon introduced this as part of an upgrade package (following a trend of monetizing some software features). So, R8 users can purchase an upgrade that enables on-screen aspect ratio guides for various social media formats, etc., which originally wasn’t in the camera. This is optional, but nice for those who want it. Firmware 1.4.0 and 1.5.0 also improved security (WPA3 Wi-Fi support) and allowed performing updates via the mobile app (a convenience feature). Another fix related to the R8 was addressing some overheating indicator accuracy – ensuring the temperature warning appears appropriately (some early R8 units would show a warning a bit too conservatively; firmware tuned that so it doesn’t trigger early unnecessarily). While the R8 didn’t get as many new “features” via firmware as the R7, it’s been kept up-to-date and stable. One thing Canon can’t fix via firmware is battery life, of course – that remains a physical limitation.
• EOS R6 Firmware: The R6 had a series of significant firmware updates during its production. By Sept 2024 it was at v1.9.0 (and I believe it even hit 1.9.1 eventually). Key updates included: v1.1.1 (late 2020) which improved temperature management slightly and fixed overheat indicator logic. v1.3.0 (Apr 2021) was big – it added Canon Log 3 gamma for video, giving the R6 a flatter profile for more grading headroom (this was huge for videographers, as C-Log3 significantly improves dynamic range capture). It also enabled shooting 1080p @ 120fps with sound and improved RF lens support. v1.4.0 (Aug 2021) further extended 4K recording times under certain conditions and added simultaneous video output to both memory card and external recorder. v1.5.0/1.6.0 (late 2021) brought vehicle AF tracking (cars/motorcycles) and improved people/animal eye detection algorithms to match what was introduced in the R3. These updates in effect trickled down some newer AF smarts to the R6. By the final 1.8.0 and 1.9.0 updates in 2023-24, Canon mostly included compatibility for new lenses (like new super-tele RF lenses) and minor fixes. All told, the R6 became more capable over time – many early criticisms (no C-Log3, short video time) were at least partially mitigated. A wedding videographer in 2025 can shoot C-Log3 on an R6 and intercut footage more easily with R5/R6II now, which wasn’t possible at launch. Canon has since shifted focus to R6 Mark II, so we may not see much more on R6 original firmware, but it’s safe to say it’s “matured” now.

These updates show Canon’s support: R7 and R8 owners can expect continued firmware love for a few years. In fact, just mid-2025, Canon issued new firmware for 12 EOS R models simultaneously (R5 II, R6 II, R7, R8, etc.), indicating improvements like custom continuous shooting settings and bug fixes. So Canon is unifying some features across the lineup where possible. Another example: Pre-shooting buffer – initially only R6 II had that, but firmware gave R8 the same ability (and R7 might get it in a Mark II version if not via firmware).

It’s also worth noting that as of 2025, Canon introduced an interesting concept of paid firmware upgrades (as mentioned for R8) for enhanced features (they’ve done this for video RAW output on some cameras in past too). So far, none of the critical features for these models are paywalled (you don’t need to pay to unlock any advertised capability), but if you want extra tools (like the video crop guides), it’s a small fee. Reactions are mixed in the community, but it’s something to be aware of.

In summary, if you buy an R7 or R8 now, you’re getting a better camera than at launch due to these firmware tweaks. And Canon’s track record with the R6 shows they’re willing to address concerns (to a reasonable extent) and add value through updates.

Who Should Buy the R7, R8, or R6? (Recommendations by User Type)

Finally, let’s break down which camera is best for different types of users, to help you decide:

• For Beginners and Casual Shooters: The Canon EOS R8 is a very attractive option for beginners who want high-quality results without a complicated experience. Its simplified controls, fully automatic scene modes, and guided user interface (if enabled) make it quite approachable. Yet it has the headroom to grow with you – as your skills improve, you can explore manual modes, 10-bit Log video, etc. Beginners will love the R8’s image quality straight out of camera and its lightweight feel. One thing to note: if you’re totally new to ILCs, the R8’s short battery life could be frustrating (nobody likes their camera dying during a day tour). But that’s manageable with spares. The R7 is more feature-dense (which can be good or bad for a beginner). It has more buttons and customization – great for learning and not outgrowing quickly, but it might overwhelm someone who isn’t tech-inclined. On the plus side, if a beginner specifically is interested in action (say a parent wanting to shoot kids’ sports or birds in the backyard), the R7’s forgiving burst and AF will increase their success rate dramatically, compared to an entry-level DSLR or lower model. The R6, being older and pricier initially, is less likely to be a beginner’s first camera (unless bought used by a beginner who did a lot of research). It’s a bit heavier and has more pro-oriented features that you might not use if you’re just casually shooting in auto mode. However, some beginners do start ambitiously – if you are a novice who wants to eventually go pro or you value the feel of a robust camera, a used R6 could actually be a great investment. Just be ready to study the manual and learn its deeper functions to justify it. Overall, for most casual shooters, the R8 hits the sweet spot of ease of use and superb results – it’s the camera you can leave in Scene Intelligent Auto and get fantastic photos of your family vacation, and then gradually learn to use creative controls when you’re ready.
• For Enthusiast Photographers: Enthusiasts are those who have some experience and shoot for the joy of it, possibly spanning multiple genres (a bit of landscape, some sports, some portraits, etc.). This group should really weigh what they shoot most. Enthusiast wanting all-around performance – the EOS R6 (or R6 Mark II) is very appealing. It’s the most well-rounded: great build, dual cards, good low light, fast bursts, capable video (with some limits). Many enthusiasts who came from a 90D or 7D or 6D have jumped to the R6 and found it a revelation in autofocus and hit rate. In 2025, an enthusiast can get an R6 (used) and possibly a lens or two for the original price of the body alone – a smart way to level-up their gear. If video isn’t a big priority and 20MP is fine, the R6 offers a “premium” shooting experience at a mid-range price now. Enthusiast focusing on wildlife/action – the EOS R7 is tailor-made for you, unless you can afford a step up to the R5 or R3. The R7 has been called the “spiritual 7D III” and indeed enthusiast bird photographers love it paired with lenses like the RF100-400 or adapted EF100-400, etc., to get tremendous reach and detail. As one Canon Community expert advised a hobbyist comparing R6 II vs R7 for wildlife: “the R7 is a great camera… for wildlife and large prints, the R7 would likely be my choice”, particularly noting the lens size/cost advantage of APS-C reddit.com. The enthusiast who prints large landscapes or does a lot of post-processing might lean R8 or a higher MP body, because the R8’s full-frame dynamic range and lower noise floor provide more editing latitude. Enthusiast hybrid shooter – likely the R8 again, because it lets you dabble or dive into video without needing a separate cine camera, while still giving you excellent stills. Enthusiasts also often appreciate value: and honestly all three are high value in different ways (R7 being unique for features, R8 for sensor, R6 for used pricing). One might say the R8 is the “enthusiast generalist” camera, the R7 the “enthusiast specialist” camera (specializing in action reach), and the R6 the “enthusiast-turned-semi-pro” camera.
• For Professionals or Semi-Pros: Typically, pros will be looking at higher-end bodies (R5, R3, or now R5 Mark II, R1) as their main tools. However, many pros have a second body or backup – and that’s where these models come in. The EOS R6 was actually used by many professionals (wedding shooters, photojournalists, sports shooters on a budget) as a primary camera from 2020–2022, and many are still using it. It has the needed features for pro work: dual slots for redundancy, durable build, fast and accurate AF, and it works with pro lenses (RF L glass, EF L via adapter) seamlessly. If you are a pro or aspiring pro who wants an affordable way into the Canon RF system, a pre-owned R6 is arguably the best choice among these. It can handle paid jobs – portrait sessions, events, even sports – reliably. The only limiting factor might be delivering extremely large prints or cropping – if your clients demand high resolution, 20MP might fall short (though plenty of magazine spreads and wedding albums have been made from 20MP files). For those cases, a pro would likely use an R5/R5II anyway. The EOS R7 could be a pro’s second/backup body if their main work is wildlife or sports. For example, a professional bird photographer might use an R5 (45MP) as main and an R7 to effectively get extra reach or higher frame rate. The R7’s dual slots and weather sealing mean it can be used in pro scenarios – it’s safe to do so (it’s not like using an EOS Rebel which lacks those). There are indeed some pro sports shooters who keep an R7 with a telephoto on the side to get a different angle or extra reach. However, for most other pro work (weddings, studio, etc.), the R7’s APS-C sensor is a disadvantage (less lens utilization, lower ISO handling in dark venues). The EOS R8 is a bit of an odd proposition for pros: its output is unquestionably “pro-quality” (no one could tell an R8 file from an R6II file in a vacuum), so you could deliver professional results from it. But the body’s lack of redundancy and shorter endurance make it risky for one-chance events. I would not recommend an R8 as a sole main camera for a paid wedding, for instance – one card failure and you’re done. However, a pro could use an R8 creatively: for example, a pro videographer might use R8’s as crash cams or gimbal cams where its light weight and great image make it perfect (some wedding film-makers now have an R8 on a gimbal and R6II on tripod, etc.). Or a pro travel photographer who values minimal gear might carry an R8 in places they wouldn’t want to risk a $4k body, yet still get amazing shots. Canon actually implied in launch materials that the R8 and R6 II together effectively replace the old EOS R – meaning pros could use R6II as main, R8 as lightweight second unit. In practice, if you are a working professional and you must choose one of these as your main camera, the EOS R6 (Mark II) is the appropriate choice. If budget is tight, an original R6 can certainly do pro work (with known limitations in video). The R7 or R8 would be more niche tools or for pros in specific situations, not general-purpose main cameras for heavy daily use.
• By Genre Quick Picks:
  • Wildlife/Birding: R7 (primary) or R6 (if low light is more important than reach). Possibly R7 + invest saved money in a good telephoto lens – that’s often a better recipe for wildlife success than an R8 with an average lens, since reach and AF matter a lot.
  • Sports/Action: R7 for amateur sports shooters on budget. R6 if you shoot indoor sports (better ISO) or need dual cards for critical shoots. R8 can do sports but ideally in good light and if you’re okay using e-shutter; its smaller buffer and lack of grip might frustrate for heavy sports use.
  • Portraits: R8 for most (full-frame look, resolution sufficient). R6 if you prioritize reliability or already own it – it produces lovely portraits too (some prefer its 20MP for manageable file sizes in large volume studios). R7 only if you’re on budget and do more casual portraits, or if you often need extra reach for candid/headshots from a distance.
  • Landscape: R8 for dynamic range and portability. R6 if you want IBIS for handheld and don’t mind fewer MP. R7 if you want lots of detail in a light package and perhaps can’t afford high-end lenses (the R7 + an affordable EF-S wide lens is a low-cost landscape kit, albeit not the absolute best IQ).
  • Vlogging/YouTube: R8 strongly, for the uncropped 4K, flip screen, and full-frame shallow DOF for B-roll. Only caveat is plan for power (dummy battery or power bank for long recordings). R7 is good if you need unlimited recording and want to use it also for stills – many content creators on a tighter budget appreciate the R7’s do-it-all nature and long battery. R6 is least ideal unless you have the Mark II, due to the 30-min limit/overheat (for YouTube that’s okay since you rarely roll more than a few minutes per take, but for streaming it’s a problem).
  • Street/Travel: R8 again for being inconspicuous (small) and great in low light city scenes. R7 if you like a bit of extra reach for street (turn a 50 into 80mm equiv, etc.) and want to save images to two cards for security while traveling. R6 is great image-wise but heavier to lug around a city all day.

To wrap up this section: each of these cameras has a clear audience. The EOS R7 is best for enthusiasts (or pros) who prioritize speed, reach, and don’t mind APS-C. The EOS R8 is ideal for hobbyists and semi-pros who want full-frame quality and modern video features in the most affordable, compact form (with the understanding that it’s not built for heavy rigors). The EOS R6 (original) is still a superb “workhorse” camera for serious photographers – if you want a camera that can handle almost anything you throw at it and you find one in your budget, it’s a very sound choice going into 2025, especially for stills-centric shooters or as a dependable second body.

Canon’s Latest and Upcoming Mirrorless Models (Mid/Late 2025)

Canon’s R-series lineup hasn’t stood still. It’s worth briefly mentioning the recently released and rumored models to give context to the R7, R8, R6 in the current ecosystem:

• Canon EOS R6 Mark II: This camera was released in late 2022 (the successor to the R6) and as of 2025 sits above the R7/R8 in price (~$2,300). It improved on the original R6 with a 24.2MP sensor, no 30min limit, multi-function hotshoe, 40fps e-shutter, and even better AF algorithms. If you love the idea of the R6 but have a bit more to spend, the R6 II is worth a look (though it’s outside our main compare). Many R6 II features trickled down to the R8 (sensor, AF, etc.). Canon claims to have improved rolling shutter on R6 II via sensor tweaks – helpful for electronic shutter use. Essentially, the R6 Mark II is a more refined R6, but at nearly twice the price of an R7/R8, so it’s more for higher-end enthusiasts or pros.
• Canon EOS R5 Mark II: This is a new flagship 5-series model launched in August 2024 (replacing the original R5 from 2020). It is a 45MP full-frame like the R5, but crucially uses a stacked, backside-illuminated sensor for much faster readout. The R5 Mark II can shoot up to 30 fps with its electronic shutter (with minimal rolling distortion thanks to that fast sensor). It also introduced Canon’s Eye Control AF in an R5 body – a feature where the camera tracks where your eye is looking in the viewfinder to quickly select a focus point (this tech first appeared on the EOS R3 and older film cameras). Reviews (like Amateur Photographer’s) have been glowing, calling it “the best professional high-resolution, high-speed all-rounder on the market” and noting that eye-control AF “elevates it from its rivals”. The R5 II is also a video beast: 8K up to 60fps internally (with RAW option), no overheating thanks to a built-in heat dissipation system, and it offers features like false color, waveform, and even a new LP-E6P high-capacity battery for longer shooting. Essentially, the R5 Mark II is a do-it-all pro camera for those who need high resolution and speed. It launched at an MSRP of $4,299 body-only. For our R7/R8/R6 users, the R5 II is something to drool over – it shows what tech might trickle down in years to come (stacked sensors, eye-control AF perhaps in more models). But it’s a distinct class (and price) above. Some R5 II specs: 45MP BSI stacked CMOS, 5.76M-dot EVF, 30fps e-shutter, 12fps mechanical, same Digic X + new “Digic X accelerator” architecture (which both R5II and R1 share) for advanced AF. Interestingly, Canon launched the R5 II alongside the R1…
• Canon EOS R1: The long-rumored flagship, finally officially unveiled July 2024. The R1 is the mirrorless successor to the 1D X series – Canon’s top-of-the-line for sports, wildlife, and press photographers. It features a 24.2MP full-frame stacked BSI sensor and dual processors (Digic X + Digic Accelerator, like R5 II) for extreme speed. Canon touts “extremely fast readout” with a new “cross-type” dual pixel AF sensor that improves focus on linear detail. The R1 can shoot up to 40 fps with full AF/AE with its electronic shutter (blackout-free EVF). It’s built for speed and toughness – think integrated vertical grip, bombproof build, huge battery (it uses the 1D-series battery). For video, it’s actually a bit less about resolution than R5 II: R1 tops out at 6K RAW 60p and 4K (likely oversampled) up to 120p. The rationale is pro sports shooters don’t need 8K, but they need absolute reliability and speed (the R1 can record 6K RAW to dual cards simultaneously for redundancy, etc.). It also has some new AF modes (body part detection – head/torso for athletes – via deep learning). The price: expected $6,499 (body) at launch, though official press said $6,299, availability Fall 2024. This puts it firmly as the camera for Olympic photographers, agencies, etc. Early hands-ons (and perhaps by 2025 some usage in the field) indicate the R1 is a beast for action, with virtually no rolling shutter (Canon says sensor readout is as fast as a mechanical shutter of 1D X III). For an R7 user, the R1 is like the ultimate dream upgrade (24MP full-frame with maybe similar pixel density to R7 but with stacking to eliminate its rolling skew). For an R6/R8 user, the R1 is likely overkill unless you truly need the fastest and most durable body. But it’s inspiring to see Canon finally release it, after years of “R1 is coming” rumors. It cements that the EOS R system now has a complete range from entry (R50/R100) to flagship (R1).
• Other recent models: Canon also released EOS R8’s little siblings – the EOS R50 (Feb 2023) as a beginner APS-C camera below R10, and EOS R100 (mid-2023) as a very basic RF mount APS-C. These target the sub-$800 market and are more like stepping stones from smartphones. They’re not in the running for enthusiasts comparing R7/R8, but it shows Canon’s commitment to APS-C in RF mount. On the high megapixel front, rumors persist of an EOS R5 S or R7C but nothing concrete by mid-2025. Canon also launched some interesting lenses (like inexpensive RF 16mm and 85mm f/2, etc.) which benefit R7/R8 users in particular.
• Rumored/upcoming: As seen in rumor mills, an EOS R7 Mark II is speculated to arrive maybe in late 2025 canonrumors.com. CanonRumors suggests it could be a “baby R1” in concept, possibly meaning it might get a stacked APS-C sensor or other trickle-down tech canonrumors.com. There’s also talk of a variant called R7 V (video-oriented APS-C) canonrumors.com – maybe a model that prioritizes video features like internal ND or 6K recording in an APS-C body. These are not confirmed by Canon officially, but if you’re thinking about the R7, it’s worth knowing a Mark II is likely in development. However, given Canon’s typical cycles, even if R7 II comes in late 2025, the R7 Mark I remains an excellent tool now (and will likely drop in price further if a successor appears). As for R1 – if you consider that “rumored” for a long time, it’s now real. Some expected maybe a global shutter or >30fps at 30MP, but Canon chose 24MP at 40fps, likely balancing speed and low-light performance. There is also talk of an EOS R5 Mark II being followed by perhaps an EOS R5 “studio” (high-res) variant – something to compete with Sony’s A7R V or Nikon Z7 line. Nothing confirmed yet, but Canon might surprise with a high-megapixel RF body (the old EOS 5DS was 50MP DSLR; perhaps an RF version could appear with 60-100MP range for studio/landscape specialists).

In any case, the presence of the R5 II and R1 at the top end means tech will continue to flow down. We might see stacked sensors in more affordable bodies by 2026–2027, eye-control AF maybe in the R3 successor or even R5 III eventually, etc. For someone buying now: none of these upcoming rumors diminish the R7, R8, R6’s capabilities – they’re still among the best in their classes in 2025. But it’s great to see an upgrade path if you ever outgrow these. If you do eventually need something beyond R7/R8/R6, Canon now offers a clear ladder: e.g. move to R5 II for more res, or R3 (24MP pro) or R1 for ultimate sports, etc.

In summary, mid-2025 finds Canon’s mirrorless lineup stronger than ever. The R7, R8, and R6 (Mark I) sit at a critical mid-tier where most enthusiasts shop, and they hold their own even as newer models emerge. The R7 provides a bridge to those flagship innovations for APS-C shooters (and an R7 Mark II might bring even more). The R8 leverages tech from the R6 II/R5 II era to give amazing performance to a wider audience. And the R6, while now superseded, proved the formula of a balanced hybrid camera that Canon continues with R6 II and R5 II. The recently launched R5 Mark II and R1 are exciting – they demonstrate Canon’s commitment to pushing boundaries (45MP at 30fps, 24MP at 40fps, eye control focus, etc.). That technology will eventually influence the next generation of R-series cameras that more people can afford. For now, if you’re looking at an R7, R8, or R6 in 2025, you can buy with confidence knowing Canon’s system is robust and growing.

Conclusion and Buying Advice

Choosing between the Canon EOS R7, R8, and R6 ultimately comes down to your specific shooting needs and priorities:

• Go with the EOS R7 if you crave speed, reach, and bang-for-buck. It’s the best choice for wildlife and action enthusiasts on a budget – you’ll capture birds, sports, and fast action with ease thanks to its 15 fps burst and deep buffer dpreview.com. The 32.5MP APS-C sensor offers lots of detail (under good light) and effectively extends your telephoto lenses’ reach by 1.6×, which is a huge benefit for distant subjects. It also doubles as a very competent video camera with oversampled 4K and unlimited recording. The R7’s dual card slots and weather-sealing give confidence for serious use. On the downside, low-light/high-ISO performance isn’t as strong as the full-frames, and lens selection (RF-S) is limited (though adapting EF glass is always an option). If you’re the type of shooter who doesn’t mind investing in glass over body, the R7 lets you allocate more budget to quality lenses (like an RF100-500 or EF500 f/4 via adapter) rather than the body itself. You’ll get results that rival much more expensive setups in those niche areas. As one review said, “there may be some features left off the wish list, but it’s still very much an excellent camera” – that sums up the R7: a few compromises, but excellent at what it does.
• Choose the EOS R8 if you want full-frame image quality and cutting-edge AF/video in the lightest, most affordable package. The R8 is a fantastic generalist camera – perfect for travel, portraits, events (with caution), and everyday creativity. You get the coveted shallow depth of field and low-light performance of a full frame sensor, and with 24MP it’s plenty for large prints and cropping. The autofocus is class-leading, inherited straight from Canon’s higher models, so it will nail focus on eyes and moving subjects with uncanny ease. For video shooters, the R8 is a gift: oversampled 4K up to 60p with no crop, 10-bit C-Log3 for grading, and even features like focus breathing correction and false color (via firmware updates from Canon’s cinema line). It truly is “the best full-frame Canon for most people” as PetaPixel put it. The sacrifices are known: very short battery life (pick up a couple extra batteries and/or a USB PD powerbank – it’s a must), no IBIS (you may need to invest in stabilized lenses or use a tripod/gimbal for certain shots), and a simpler control scheme that might not satisfy those who love lots of dials and buttons. It’s also not built for abuse – treat it kindly (maybe get a small cage or silicone skin if you want more grip and protection for it). If those limitations aren’t deal-breakers, the R8 is arguably the best value in Canon’s lineup for hybrid shooters right now, delivering a level of quality that, a few years ago, would’ve cost twice as much. It’s an ideal step-up camera for someone coming from an older DSLR or a beginner camera – you will immediately see and feel the upgrade in autofocus intelligence and image output. It’s also the easiest to carry around, meaning you’ll likely have it with you more often – and the best camera is the one you have with you to capture the moment.
• Consider the EOS R6 (original) if you’re an enthusiast or pro looking for a sturdy, reliable workhorse and can either find one used at a good price or don’t need the latest bells and whistles. The R6 offers a superb balance: 20MP may sound modest today, but those pixels are extremely clean and the camera’s image quality (colors, dynamic range) is excellent. It’s great for wedding photographers, event shooters, documentary shooters – anyone who needs a camera that “just works” in varying conditions. The in-body stabilization gives you flexibility in low light, and dual card slots give peace of mind on important jobs. Its weather-sealed body and robust shutter (rated 300k) mean it can handle heavy use. Now that it’s been surpassed by the Mark II, you might snag deals – which can make it a smarter buy than a new R7/R8 if you value its strengths. Do note, for purely hobby use, an R6 might be overkill if you don’t take advantage of its durability or dual slots. And for pure image quality, the R8 actually has a slight edge (since it’s 4 years newer tech). But the intangible factor with the R6 is how confidence-inspiring it feels to shoot with – pros have used it as a main camera successfully for years. If you aspire to do paid work or just want a camera that can handle a bit of everything (sports, portraits, landscapes, all decently well) and you’re okay with 20MP, the R6 is still a top contender. Its legacy is evident: many of the R6’s features set the foundation for newer models. It might not turn as many heads in 2025 as the latest releases, but as DPReview said in their conclusion, “it’s a superb photographer’s camera.” dpreview.com

Final advice: Assess what matters most for your photography. Is it the sensor size and ultimate image quality? Then lean toward the full-frame R8/R6. Is it action performance and telephoto reach on a budget? The R7 will likely delight you. Do you need a dependable tool for paid gigs or hardcore use? An R6 (or R6 Mark II) is a wiser long-term investment (and keep an eye on R5 Mark II if budget allows, as it’s a class leader for pros). If you still can’t decide, it’s worth handling the cameras in person if possible – the R6 will feel the most substantial, the R8 very light and compact, the R7 somewhere in between. Sometimes that tactile difference is enough to sway a decision, as how a camera feels in your hands influences how often and how enjoyably you use it.

No matter which you choose, you’ll be getting a superb camera. The EOS R system in 2025 is mature and rich – each of these models benefits from Canon’s renowned color science, Dual Pixel AF, and a growing RF lens lineup. They can all produce professional-grade results. As one reviewer said about the R8 (but it applies broadly), “you get a lot of camera for your money” dpreview.com – that’s true of the R7 and used R6 as well. These are cameras that a decade ago would’ve seemed almost magical in capability at their price points.

Links to learn more / sources: If you want to dive deeper, check out DPReview’s full reviews of these models (e.g., “Canon EOS R7 Review” on DPReview, “Canon EOS R8 Review”, “Canon EOS R6 Review”) for exhaustive detail and studio test comparisons. Also browse Amateur Photographer’s reviews (they reviewed R7, R8, R6 II, R5 II with excellent real-world insights – e.g., AP says “EOS R8 images would please anybody, and its autofocus is absolutely superb”). For a different perspective, PetaPixel’s reviews of the R7 and R8 are great reads (they often discuss how these cameras fit into a photographer’s workflow – PetaPixel calling the R7 “a compelling offering” and R8 “the best for most people” petapixel.com). And if you’re curious about the new flagship tech, Canon’s official press releases for the R1 and R5 Mark II outline the advancements (Canon USA Newsroom, July 2024). I’ll provide the relevant links and citations below for reference.

In closing, mid-2025 is a fantastic time to be a photographer or videographer in the Canon ecosystem. The EOS R7, R8, and R6 each offer incredible capabilities for their class – from high-speed action shooting to full-frame cinematic video – and they do so at prices that democratize features once reserved for flagship cameras. Match the camera to your needs, invest in good lenses, and you’ll have a setup that can serve you well for years to come. Happy shooting!

Sources:

• DPReview – Canon EOS R7 Review (Dan Bracaglia, July 2022) dpreview.com
• DPReview – Canon EOS R8 Review (Brendan Nystedt & Richard Butler, July 2023)
• DPReview – Canon EOS R6 Review (July 2020) dpreview.com
• Amateur Photographer – Canon EOS R7 Full Review (Josh Waller, Feb 2025) amateurphotographer.com
• Amateur Photographer – Canon EOS R8 Review (Andy Westlake, Mar 2025)
• Amateur Photographer – Canon EOS R5 Mark II Review (Andy Westlake, May 2025)
• Canon USA Press Release – Launch of EOS R1 and R5 Mark II (July 2024)
• PetaPixel – Canon EOS R7 Review: One of the Best Cameras Canon Makes (Ryan Mense, Aug 2022) petapixel.com
• PetaPixel – Canon EOS R8 Review: The Best Full-Frame Canon for Most People (David Schloss, Feb 2023) petapixel.com
• RTINGS.com – Canon EOS R7 Review (Updated Feb 2025) rtings.com
• RTINGS.com – Canon EOS R8 Review (Updated Feb 2025)
• GearFocus Blog – Canon EOS R6: Why It’s a Steal Used in 2025 (Mar 2025)