Apple Watch SE 3 vs Samsung Galaxy Watch FE – The Ultimate Budget Smartwatch Showdown

Key Facts

• Latest Affordable Models: Apple’s new Watch SE 3 (announced Sept 9, 2025) is a budget-friendly smartwatch packed with high-end trickle-down features ^[1]. Samsung’s Galaxy Watch FE (launched June 2024) is its first “Fan Edition” watch, essentially a repackaged Galaxy Watch4 with updated glass and a lower price ^{[2] [3]}. Both are currently available worldwide, targeting value-conscious consumers.
• Price & Availability: The Apple Watch SE 3 starts at $249 (40mm GPS) – about £219 in the UK or €269 in Europe – with a 44mm option ($279) and +$50 for 5G cellular models ^[4]. The Galaxy Watch FE undercuts it at $199.99 (£170/€199) for the Bluetooth-only 40mm model ^[5], with an LTE version for $249.99 later in 2024 ^[6]. Apple’s watch is sold in Midnight (black) and Starlight (champagne) aluminum finishes ^[7], while Samsung’s FE comes in Black, Pink Gold, or Silver aluminum ^[8]. Both are broadly available in North America, Europe, and Asia.
• Design & Build: Apple Watch SE 3 retains the familiar rectangular 40mm/44mm case with a Retina OLED display (now Always-On for the first time) ^{[9] [10]}. Samsung’s Watch FE uses a classic round 40mm case with a 1.2-inch AMOLED always-on screen ^[11]. The SE 3’s Ion-X strengthened glass is 4× more crack-resistant than before ^[12], while the FE boasts sapphire crystal for superior scratch resistance ^{[13] [14]}. Both have 50 m water resistance (Apple WR50 vs Samsung 5ATM/IP68) for swimming, but the FE also meets MIL-STD-810H for added durability ^[15]. Each watch is lightweight (Apple ~26–33 g, Samsung 26.6 g) and comfortable on the wrist, with easily swappable bands (Apple’s vast band ecosystem; Samsung’s new one-click 20 mm bands) to suit personal style.
• Performance: Apple’s SE 3 is powered by the latest S10 dual-core chip – the same fast processor as the Series 11 – enabling smooth performance, on-device Siri, and new gesture controls ^{[16] [17]}. In contrast, the Galaxy Watch FE runs on the older Exynos W920 dual-core 1.18 GHz chip from 2021 ^[18]. Reviews note the FE can feel laggy navigating apps and menus ^[19], essentially performing like a 3-year-old Galaxy Watch4. The SE 3’s snappy chipset and optimized watchOS deliver a more fluid experience, whereas the FE’s aging silicon struggles under newer Wear OS software.
• Battery Life: Apple rates the Watch SE 3 at 18 hours “all-day” battery life – even with the new always-on display – and it supports fast charging (about 0–80% in 45 minutes) ^{[20] [21]}. Samsung claims up to 40 hours on the Galaxy Watch FE ^[22], but real-world tests show ~18–24 hours with typical use (always-on off) ^[23]. In fact, reviewers could barely get a full day on the FE without toggling power-saving modes ^[24]. The FE also lacks the faster charging of Samsung’s newer watches (its 247 mAh battery takes roughly 2 hours to top up). In short, both watches last about a day per charge in practice, but Apple’s charges much faster to get you back on your wrist ^[25].
• Health & Sensors: The Watch SE 3 significantly upgrades its health toolkit over previous SEs – it now includes wrist temperature sensors for cycle tracking and Sleep insights ^{[26] [27]}, plus new sleep apnea notifications and sleep score tracking in watchOS 26 ^{[28] [29]}. It retains core sensors like optical heart rate, accelerometer, gyroscope, altimeter, and compass. What’s missing? SE 3 still omits the ECG and blood oxygen sensors of Apple’s higher-end models ^[30]. Samsung’s Galaxy Watch FE, meanwhile, actually has more advanced sensors: its BioActive sensor array offers optical HR and an ECG electrocardiogram and BIA (bioelectrical impedance analysis for body fat) ^{[31] [32]}. It can even measure blood pressure (with cuff calibration) via Samsung Health Monitor and read SpO₂ blood oxygen. However, the FE does not have a skin temperature sensor, unlike Apple’s SE 3 ^[33]. Each watch provides high/low heart rate alerts and irregular rhythm (AFib) notifications ^{[34] [35]}. Bottom line: Galaxy Watch FE offers ECG, BP, SpO₂, and body composition, whereas Apple Watch SE 3 adds temperature tracking but lacks those other sensors.
• Fitness & Health Features: Both devices cover the basics and beyond. Out of the box, Apple Watch SE 3 tracks daily activity rings, heart rate, VO₂ max estimates, and over 100 workout types (with customizable workouts in watchOS). New Sleep Score gives a simple 0–100 rating each morning for sleep quality ^{[36] [37]}, and the SE 3 can alert wearers to potential sleep apnea patterns during the night ^[38]. It supports fall detection and emergency SOS calls as well. Samsung’s Watch FE similarly tracks a wide range of exercises (100+ modes) and offers advanced running analysis and personalized heart-rate zones for training ^{[39] [40]}. Its sleep tracking is robust – with sleep stages, coaching tips, and even SmartThings integration to create a better sleep environment ^[41]. The FE also proactively monitors heart health: high/low heart-rate alerts and Irregular Heart Rhythm Notification for AFib are built-in ^[42]. Both watches can motivate users with achievement badges, coaching, and wellness insights, but Samsung’s inclusion of on-demand ECG and body composition readings adds a layer of health data Apple’s SE lacks (short of upgrading to a Series model).
• Smart Features & Ecosystem: The Apple Watch SE 3 runs watchOS 26, integrating tightly with the Apple ecosystem. It can mirror iPhone notifications, use Siri on-device for quick commands (now even to log health data) ^[43], stream Apple Music/Podcasts over Wi-Fi or 5G, and even play audio through its built-in speaker ^[44]. Users get seamless Apple Pay, a vast selection of watch apps and faces, and features like Family Setup (for kids/elders) and Find My item tracking. The Galaxy Watch FE runs Wear OS (One UI Watch 5), which means Google services alongside Samsung’s apps. It supports Google Assistant (or Bixby), Google Pay or Samsung Wallet for contactless pay, Spotify offline playlists, and a variety of Wear OS apps (though the catalog is smaller than Apple’s). Unique to Samsung, the FE can remotely control a paired phone’s camera and music, and use Find My Phone pings ^[45]. One caveat: some of FE’s best functions work best with Samsung phones – for instance, ECG and blood pressure measurements officially require a Samsung Galaxy phone with the Samsung Health Monitor app ^[46]. In contrast, Apple Watch only pairs with iPhones (iPhone 11 or later for SE 3 ^[47]) but then everything works seamlessly. Neither watch is compatible with the opposite ecosystem (Apple Watch won’t work with Android at all, and Galaxy Watch won’t pair with iOS).
• Connectivity: Apple Watch SE 3 offers GPS and optional 5G cellular connectivity – notably, it’s Apple’s first budget watch to support 5G, which means faster data for calls, texts, music streaming and even future-ready features when untethered from an iPhone ^{[48] [49]}. The Galaxy Watch FE comes in Bluetooth-only or 4G LTE models (no 5G) ^[50]. Both have Bluetooth 5, Wi-Fi, and NFC for payments. Each has built-in GPS for phone-free tracking of runs and rides. Apple’s SE 3 lacks the new UWB (Ultra Wideband) chip that premium Apple Watches have for precise device locating ^[51], whereas Samsung’s FE lacks the newer dual-band GPS found in more expensive watches – so its location tracking, while solid, isn’t as pinpoint in challenging environments ^[52].
• Real-World Performance: Early reviews praise the Apple Watch SE 3 for bringing high-end performance and features to the entry level. “The SE 3 stole the spotlight with the highest number of new additions… casual users can safely opt for the budget model without nearly as much fear of missing out,” notes Macworld ^[53]. It feels nearly as fast and capable as the flagship models, and notably, Apple finally added the always-on display and temperature sensing that were missing in prior SEs. On the other hand, Samsung’s Galaxy Watch FE garnered mixed feedback. The Verge bluntly called it “a Galaxy Watch 4 by any other name,” criticizing that as an entry-level device the FE “doesn’t quite nail the right mix of price, features, and hardware” ^{[54] [55]}. Reviewers liked the FE’s comprehensive health tracking and comfortable design, but were disappointed by its poor battery life and sluggish performance. Android Authority found the FE’s 247 mAh battery “barely making it 24 hours” and the watch saddled with “the same tiny display and thick bezels… and chipset Samsung rolled out three years ago”, concluding that “Galaxy Watch FE walks like a Galaxy Watch4 and talks like a Galaxy Watch4 because it is a Galaxy Watch4” ^{[56] [57]}. In short, Samsung’s effort feels dated, whereas Apple’s SE 3 feels refreshingly up-to-date for a “budget” model.
• Value & Best For:Apple Watch SE 3 is arguably the best value for iPhone owners who want a full Apple Watch experience at a lower cost. At ~$249, it delivers nearly all the core features of Apple’s $400+ models (minus ECG and a brighter screen) – making it ideal for casual fitness enthusiasts, students, or anyone not needing the pro-grade sensors. It’s also a top pick for family members (kids or seniors) to use with cellular as a safety/communication device. Samsung Galaxy Watch FE is aimed at Android users – particularly those with Samsung phones – seeking a smartwatch under $200. It offers tremendous health features for the price (ECG, body composition, etc.) and does the job for basic fitness and notifications. However, its value is muddled by the fact that the year-older Galaxy Watch6 or even Watch7 often go on sale around the same price with better specs ^[58]. The FE is best for budget-conscious buyers who specifically want Samsung’s ecosystem (e.g. Samsung Health, camera controller, etc.) and don’t mind the one-size (40mm) limitation. If you catch the FE at a discount, it can be a solid bargain – but if paying full price, many tech reviewers actually recommend spending a bit more (or finding a sale on a Watch6/7) for a much better experience ^{[59] [60]}. Meanwhile, Apple’s SE 3, even at full price, is considered “an incredible value” by Apple’s own marketing and largely backed up by the feature set ^[61].

In-Depth Comparison

Specifications at a Glance

• High/low heart rate alerts; Irregular rhythm (AFib) alerts
• Sleep tracking (stages) + Sleep Score metric ^[88]
• Sleep apnea risk notifications (new) ^[89]
• Cycle tracking with retrospective ovulation estimates (uses temp) ^{[90] [91]}
• Fall Detection and Crash Detection alerts (with SOS)
• Medication reminders, noise monitoring, etc.
  (No native ECG or BP; no blood oxygen saturation) | – 24/7 Heart-rate tracking, stress monitoring
• High/low heart rate alerts; Irregular Heart Rhythm notify (AFib) ^[92]
• Sleep tracking with stages, snore detection, sleep coaching tips ^[93]
• Blood oxygen (SpO₂) monitoring
• ECG on demand (app ECG, PDF reports) ^[94]
• Blood Pressure monitoring (with cuff calibration) ^[95]
• Body Composition analysis (BIA: body fat%, muscle mass) ^[96]
• Women’s health tracking (cycle logging – no temp sensor)
  (All health features via Samsung Health app; ECG/BP locked to Samsung phones officially.) |
  | Fitness & GPS | – Built-in GPS for pace/distance/routes (GLONASS, QZSS, etc.)
• Tracks 100+ workout types; auto-detects common workouts
• New Workout Buddy coaching (audio cues via Siri) in watchOS 26 ^[97]
• Fitness+, Apple’s guided workout service (subscription) integration
• Shares Activity rings with friends, challenges, etc. | – Built-in GPS (GLONASS, Galileo, etc.) – no dual-band GNSS
• 100+ workout modes; auto-tracking for walks/runs
• Advanced running analytics (stride, symmetry, etc.)
• Personalized HR Zones for training ^[98]
• Fitness programs in Samsung Health app; integration with Strava, etc.
• Route maps, turn-by-turn for workouts (no offline topo maps) |
  | Smart Features | – Phone calls, texts, and app notifications (requires iPhone nearby or cellular)
• Siri voice assistant (on-device processing for speed) ^[99]
• App Store with thousands of watch apps and watch faces
• Apple Pay contactless payments
• Streams Apple Music, Podcasts; can store music offline (32 GB)
• Unlock your iPhone or Mac automatically
• Family Setup support (pair watch for a child/parent without their own iPhone)
• Emergency SOS and International emergency calling (cell models)
• Find My integration (ping iPhone; locate friends or items) | – Call, text, and notifications (works with any Android; LTE model can standalone)
• Voice Assistant: Google Assistant (or Samsung Bixby)
• Google Play Store apps (Google Maps, Spotify, YouTube Music, Strava, etc.)
• Samsung Wallet / Google Pay for NFC payments ^[100]
• Plays music offline from YouTube Music, Spotify, etc. (16 GB storage)
• Camera Controller for Samsung phones (remote viewfinder & shutter) ^[101]
• SmartThings integration (control smart home devices, e.g. lights, thermostat)
• Find My Phone feature (rings your phone) ^[102]
• Safety features: trip detection, SOS (with phone connection). |
  | Battery & Charging | – 18 hours typical use (with always-on on) ^[103]
• Up to ~36 hours in Low Power Mode (est.)
• Fast charge capable: ~80% in 45 min ^[104] (USB-C magnetic puck) | – Up to 40 hours in ideal conditions (claimed) ^[105]
• ~18–24 hours real-world with AOD off (≈20 h) ^[106]
• ~50 hours in Watch-Only power saving mode (time display only)
• No fast-charge (WPC wireless dock ~2 hrs for full charge) ^[107] |
  | Build & Durability | Aluminum case (100% recycled) in Midnight or Starlight color
  Ion-X strengthened glass (chemically tempered) – 4× more crack-resistant than SE2 ^[108]
  Water resistant 50 m (WR50); dust rated IP6X (fully dust-tight)
  – Tested to withstand shocks and drops (not mil-spec certified) | Aluminum case in Black, Pink Gold, or Silver
  Sapphire Crystal glass (premium scratch resistance) ^[109]
  Water resistant 50 m (5 ATM) + IP68 dust resistant ^[110]
  MIL-STD-810H certified (shock, vibration, extreme temps, etc.)
  – Durable design based on Galaxy Watch4 Active line |

Sources: Apple Newsroom ^{[111] [112]}, Apple & Samsung official spec sheets ^{[113] [114]}, Tom’s Guide ^{[115] [116]}, The Verge ^{[117] [118]}, Android Authority ^{[119] [120]}, and others as cited.

Design and Comfort

Both watches offer quality designs, but they cater to different aesthetic preferences. Apple Watch SE 3 sticks to Apple’s signature squarish-rounded form factor – a rectangular display with curved corners and thin bezels. It looks nearly identical to the prior SE and older Series 4–6, meaning you get a bright, colorful Retina screen that now never sleeps (always-on). The 40mm case will suit those with smaller wrists, while the 44mm gives a larger screen for easier reading and typing. Apple kept the Digital Crown and side button for navigation, which, combined with the responsive touchscreen, make the UI easy to flick through. Comfort-wise, Apple’s lightweight aluminum case and smooth underside (with composite/ceramic back for sensors) make it comfortable for all-day wear – even to sleep. And thanks to Apple’s long-standing band mechanism, any 40/44mm Apple Watch band (including a huge third-party market) can be used to customize the look and feel.

The Galaxy Watch FE embraces the traditional round watch design of Samsung’s Galaxy Watch series. At first glance, it’s virtually indistinguishable from a Galaxy Watch4 or 5: a circular 40mm dial, two flat side buttons on the right, and a black bezel framing the display. Notably, the FE’s bezel is on the thicker side, yielding a 1.2-inch screen (smaller than the 1.3″ found in the newer 40mm Watch6) ^[121]. There’s no rotating bezel here (that remains an elite feature on Samsung’s “Classic” models), but the bezel is touch-sensitive for scrolling. The watch’s sapphire crystal and aluminum body give it a sturdy, premium feel despite the lower price. Weighing just 26.6 g without strap ^[122], the FE is slightly lighter and thinner (9.8 mm) than Apple’s SE (around 10.7 mm thick for 44mm). It’s comfortable for workout and sleep wear – though some with larger wrists might find the single 40mm size a tad small. Samsung’s switch to one-click bands in this model is a welcome move: you can swap straps in seconds by pressing a quick-release button, similar to Apple’s ease of swapping bands ^{[123] [124]}. Out of the box, Samsung includes a soft fluoroelastomer strap with decorative stitching that’s versatile for sport or casual use.

In terms of durability, both watches are well-built. Apple uses Ion-X glass on the SE 3 (the same strengthened glass as on aluminum Apple Watch Series models) which is very crack-resistant but can pick up scratches easier than sapphire ^[125]. Samsung goes the opposite route – the FE’s sapphire crystal virtually won’t scratch from keys or sand, but sapphire can be more shatter-prone for extreme impacts. Each watch has an aluminum frame (robust and lightweight, though not as hard as stainless steel or titanium found on pricier models). For water, both are swim-proof: Apple’s rated to 50 meters for swimming (and even track dives in the Swim workout), and Samsung’s 5ATM + IP68 rating means it too handles swims and can even survive dust, dirt, and submersion in 1.5 m of water for 30 minutes ^[126]. The Galaxy Watch FE’s MIL-STD-810H certification gives extra peace of mind if you’re hiking, doing manual labor, or prone to roughing it – it’s tested for shocks, vibration, and extreme temperatures. The Apple Watch SE 3 doesn’t have a formal MIL-STD rating, but in practice it’s quite hardy for daily bumps; its new glass is “twice as scratch-resistant” as the prior model’s ^[127] and many owners use Apple Watches during workouts and outdoor activities without issue.

Style and personalization are strong points for both. Apple offers the SE 3 in two finishes (Midnight or Starlight aluminum) which are neutral and can pair with a vast array of bands – from sporty silicone to classy leather or metal loops. There are dozens of official Apple bands and an endless aftermarket. Samsung’s FE comes in three attractive colors (Black, Silver, Pink Gold) and Samsung launched it alongside new fabric sport bands with contrast stitching that give a pop of color (the FE’s default bands have blue or orange stitching accents) ^[128]. The FE uses standard 20 mm band sizing, so you can attach any third-party 20 mm quick-release strap as well. When it comes to watch faces, Apple’s watchOS and Samsung’s Wear OS each provide plenty of options: Apple has a curated set of faces (many customizable with widgets/complications), while Samsung’s can use both Samsung’s designs and thousands of faces from the Play Store or Watch Face Studio. The SE 3’s always-on display means your chosen watch face is visible in dimmed form at all times – a first for the SE line – whereas the Galaxy Watch FE also supports an always-on mode for its faces (though using it will drain the battery faster).

Overall, Apple Watch SE 3 exudes a modern techy style – great for those who like the iconic Apple Watch look – and it offers two size choices to better fit different users. The Samsung Galaxy Watch FE leans into a more traditional watch vibe, especially with a round face that many find more “watch-like” on the wrist. It’s a shame there’s no larger 44mm FE for those who prefer a bigger watch, but the 40mm size keeps it unisex and comfortable. In summary, both are well-designed, comfortable smartwatches – the choice here largely comes down to shape and personal taste (square vs round), and of course, compatibility with your phone.

Fitness and Health Features

Health and fitness tracking are core strengths for both Apple and Samsung’s wearables, but they each have unique advantages.

Apple Watch SE 3 now inherits many health features previously reserved for higher-end models. It continuously tracks your heart rate and will notify you of unusually high or low heart rates. It also checks for irregular heart rhythms in the background, which can detect signs of atrial fibrillation (AFib) – a potentially serious heart condition – and prompt you to seek medical advice ^[129]. For general wellness, the SE 3 supports Apple’s Mindfulness app (breathing exercises and reflection prompts) and noise level monitoring to warn if your environment could damage your hearing. A big new addition is wrist temperature sensing: the SE 3 has dual temperature sensors that track changes in your skin temperature overnight ^[130]. Apple leverages this for women’s cycle tracking – it can retroactively estimate ovulation dates and improve period predictions using the subtle temperature shifts during menstrual cycles ^{[131] [132]}. This was previously only on Series 8/9 and Ultra, so it’s a notable upgrade for the SE line ^[133]. Apple also uses temperature and other metrics to provide richer wellness insights in the Health app.

One standout software feature is Apple’s new Sleep Score. While earlier watchOS versions tracked sleep duration and stages, watchOS 26 gives each night a simple score (0–100) indicating sleep quality ^[134]. This score is derived from multiple factors – consistency, time in REM/Deep sleep, interruptions, etc. – following guidelines from sleep experts ^[135]. The SE 3, with its all-night battery support (especially with fast charge to top up before bed), is well-suited to take advantage of this. Additionally, Apple introduced Sleep Apnea notifications: using the accelerometer to measure subtle breaths and pauses, the SE 3 can detect patterns suggestive of moderate to severe sleep apnea over a 30-day period ^[136]. If it flags a potential issue, it encourages you to consult a doctor for proper testing. These kinds of health alerts – quietly running in the background – highlight Apple’s approach: leveraging sensors and huge amounts of data (the Sleep study had 5 million nights of data ^[137]) to provide actionable health insights.

On the fitness front, Apple Watch is known for its Activity Rings system – you have daily Move (calories), Exercise (minutes), and Stand (hours) goals that gamify staying active. The SE 3 tracks all the same metrics as pricier models: steps, distance, floors climbed (via altimeter), and will even estimate your cardio fitness (VO₂ max) over time. It supports virtually any workout type you can think of – from running, cycling, and swimming (yes, it’s swim-proof and tracks laps) to yoga, HIIT, hiking, functional strength training, and dance. It auto-detects common workouts like outdoor walks, runs, and cycling and will prompt you to start logging if you forgot. A new Workout Buddy feature in watchOS 26 uses “Apple Intelligence” (likely on-device machine learning) to act as a virtual coach, giving you audible pep talks or feedback during exercise ^[138]. For example, on a run it might inform you if you’re on pace to meet a goal. While the SE 3 lacks the second-generation ultra wideband chip (UWB) that can precisely locate other devices, it does still use the GPS and sensors to support Precision Finding for your iPhone if misplaced, and for advanced route tracking in workouts (though ultra trail runners might prefer watches with topographic maps or longer battery life).

Samsung Galaxy Watch FE, being essentially a rebadged Watch4, surprisingly offers more in terms of raw health sensor capabilities. The built-in ECG lets you record a medical-grade single-lead ECG anytime: you open the Samsung Health Monitor app on the watch, place your finger on the side button, and it will graph your heart rhythm and tell you if it’s normal sinus or shows AFib signs. The ECG is FDA-cleared in the US and similar approved in many regions, giving at-risk users a handy tool (though it’s not a replacement for a 12-lead clinical ECG). The FE also measures blood pressure using the pulse wave analysis method – you calibrate it with a real cuff thrice, then the watch can estimate your BP on the go ^[139]. Note that you should recalibrate monthly for accuracy, and again, it’s a wellness feature, not a doctor’s measurement. Nonetheless, this is something no Apple Watch currently does (Apple has hinted at studying cuffless BP, but nothing live yet). However, remember the caveat: officially the ECG/BP functions only work with Samsung Galaxy phones (the watch pairs to other Androids fine for general use, but Samsung gatekeeps the Health Monitor app to its own phones) ^[140]. Enthusiasts have found workarounds (modding the app on non-Samsung phones ^[141]), but average users might be stuck if they don’t have a Samsung phone.

Samsung’s BioActive sensor also enables Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis (BIA) – in simpler terms, body composition scans. By touching two fingers to the buttons, the Watch FE sends a tiny current through your body and estimates body fat percentage, skeletal muscle, body water, and BMI ^[142]. It’s the same tech found in Watch4/5/6 and can be useful for tracking fitness progress beyond weight alone. While not 100% precise, it gives a ballpark that many users find motivating (e.g. seeing body fat drop over weeks of training). Apple Watch has no equivalent feature. For blood oxygen (SpO₂), the Galaxy Watch FE can do spot checks and also monitor SpO₂ during sleep, potentially alerting to breathing issues. Apple Watch SE 3 interestingly does not have the blood oxygen sensor that Apple’s Series models have had since 2020 – so that’s another health metric absent on SE.

When it comes to sleep tracking, Samsung’s watches have been quite robust. The FE provides detailed sleep stage graphs (light, deep, REM) and even detects snoring if your phone is on the nightstand. With Sleep Coaching, after a few nights it assigns you a “sleep animal” persona (like an lion or penguin) based on your patterns and offers a multi-week program to improve your sleep habits ^[143]. It’s a bit gimmicky but grounded in good advice. The FE also integrates with SmartThings: it can automatically put connected lights, thermostats, etc., into a sleep-friendly mode when it detects you’ve fallen asleep ^[144]. Apple’s approach to sleep is a bit more passive (logging and scoring), whereas Samsung tries to coach and create environment changes. Both watches allow setting bedtime schedules, silent alarms (haptic wake-up), and so on.

For general fitness, the Galaxy Watch FE covers all the bases: step counting, floors, auto workout detection, and plenty of sport modes. It offers advanced running metrics like asymmetry, contact time, and vertical oscillation if you really want to hone your form ^[145]. It also can import GPX routes (particularly on the Watch5 Pro / “Route Workout” feature – unclear if FE supports GPX, likely not as that was a Pro feature). Still, you can use third-party apps like Strava, Adidas Running, etc., on the Wear OS side. Samsung’s personalized heart rate zones feature will tailor your running intensity to your fitness level – guiding you to train in zones (warm-up, fat-burn, cardio, etc.) based on your measured HRmax and VO₂max ^[146]. Both watches will estimate VO₂max after a few outdoor runs.

Safety features are present on both, with slight differences. Apple Watch SE 3 has Fall Detection (it will call emergency services if you take a hard fall and don’t respond) and also Crash Detection (leveraging sensors to detect car crashes) – potentially life-saving features. The Galaxy Watch FE has Trip/Hard fall detection as well, which can send an SOS to contacts if you fall (this came with One UI Watch, although Samsung’s implementation may require setting up in the app). Samsung watches can also send SOS with location to contacts if you press the home key rapidly (similar to Apple’s SOS). Neither device has the Apple Watch Ultra-style siren or SOS beacon, but both can be crucial in a pinch if you have the cellular model (or a phone connected nearby).

In summary, for health sensors: Samsung FE is surprisingly loaded (ECG, BP, SpO₂, BIA) but gated by ecosystem for some, while Apple SE 3 has the basics plus the new temp sensor and very advanced algorithms for sleep and atrial fibrillation detection (note: Apple does AFib history tracking in Health app if you’re diagnosed). For fitness: both will serve the average user extremely well. Apple’s fitness ecosystem (rings, Fitness+ workouts, Apple Health app) is very cohesive, while Samsung (and Google Fit, since it’s Wear OS) is a bit more fragmented but offers more raw data points. If you’re an iPhone user, the SE 3 elegantly ties into your Health app and iCloud (exportable to your doctor, etc.). If you’re an Android user, the Galaxy Watch FE, especially when used with a Samsung phone, gives you an incredible range of health tracking at a budget price – just be ready to charge it often if you’re using all those features.

Smart Features and OS Ecosystems

Beyond fitness, a smartwatch is an extension of your smartphone on your wrist. Here’s how the Apple Watch SE 3 and Galaxy Watch FE compare in daily smart features and ecosystem integration.

Apple Watch SE 3 with watchOS 26: If you have an iPhone, the Apple Watch is as good as it gets in terms of seamless integration. Upon pairing, it can mirror notifications for virtually any app you choose – you can receive messages (and reply via voice dictation, scribble, or preset replies), see incoming calls and answer or decline them, and get all your social media pings on the wrist. The deep integration shows in little things: for example, if you set an iPhone timer or start navigation on your phone, it will show controls/directions on the watch too. Apple’s ecosystem continuity is a big plus: you can unlock your Mac just by wearing your Apple Watch, or use the watch to authenticate logins/Apple Pay on your Mac. Apple Pay on the Watch is straightforward and widely supported – double-click the side button and tap your watch to the reader, no PIN or phone needed (a boon for quick payments or if you’re out on a run with just the watch).

One of the SE 3’s upgrades is on-device Siri. Thanks to the S10 chip’s Neural Engine, Siri requests are processed on the watch itself for many queries, making it faster and usable even without internet for certain commands ^[147]. You can ask your watch via “Hey Siri” (or raise-to-speak) to send a text, start a workout, set reminders, or even log health data (“log a 8 oz of water” for example). Siri can also query the web or control HomeKit smart home devices (“turn off the lights”), though those need connectivity. The SE 3 having cellular option means you can leave the phone at home and still stream music, use Siri, get maps directions, and even receive a call (it has a built-in mic and speaker for phone calls). The Verge noted you can now play music/podcasts out loud on the SE 3’s speaker – a niche but handy feature if you want to quickly demo a song or don’t have headphones ^[148].

Apple’s App Store for watchOS is robust. Big apps like Spotify, Google Maps, WhatsApp, and more have watch apps now on Apple Watch. The SE 3’s 32GB storage means you can download plenty of apps and playlists. The app quality on watchOS is generally higher and more consistent than on Wear OS, partly due to Apple’s tighter control and earlier start with watch apps. If you’re invested in Apple services, the Watch extends them: e.g. you can use the Camera Remote app to preview and snap photos on your iPhone from a distance (prop up your iPhone and use the watch as viewfinder), similar to Samsung’s. You get Apple Maps on the watch with haptic turn alerts (your wrist taps patterns for left/right). You can also ask Siri for walking directions and see a route directly on the watch.

Family features are also a unique selling point: Apple’s Family Setup allows you to set up an Apple Watch (cellular SE or above) for someone without an iPhone (like a kid or elderly parent). They get their own phone number and you can manage trusted contacts, location alerts, and limits for them. This makes the SE 3 (cellular) a popular choice for parents to give to children as a GPS tracker and communication device that’s more subtle than a smartphone.

On the Samsung Galaxy Watch FE (Wear OS) side, the experience is best if you’re already an Android (especially Samsung) user. Pairing is done via the Galaxy Wearable app, and you’ll manage most settings in there. Notifications work similarly – any phone notification can be relayed to the watch and you can interact with many of them (Wear OS supports actionable notifications for lots of apps). For instance, you can reply to a WhatsApp or Telegram message from the watch with voice or keyboard. Wear OS now even has a full QWERTY swipe keyboard if you want to type on the tiny screen (Apple offers scribble and dictation but no full keyboard except on newer large-screen models). The Galaxy Watch FE also has a speaker and mic, so you can answer calls from your wrist when connected to the phone or on LTE. Both watches thus can function as a Dick Tracy-esque phone on the wrist when needed.

Voice assistant on the FE can be either Google Assistant or Samsung’s Bixby. Out of the box, Samsung pushes Bixby, but frankly Google Assistant is far more capable. Luckily, you can install Assistant and set it as default on the watch now (a big improvement from early Watch4 days). With Assistant, you can do everything from controlling Google Home devices, asking general questions, to sending texts via voice. Siri vs Assistant on the watch is a bit of personal preference – Assistant tends to be better at search queries (Siri is improving but still behind), while Siri on Apple Watch can integrate more deeply with iOS apps. One advantage for Assistant on Wear OS is its tie-in with Google’s new AI features – e.g., you might get some of the new “Gemini” AI functionality on watches in the future (Google’s Pixel Watch 4, for instance, advertises on-wrist AI and Assistant capabilities).

When it comes to apps, the Galaxy Watch FE uses the Google Play Store for Wear OS apps. The selection has grown since Google/Samsung revitalized Wear OS, but it’s still somewhat hit-or-miss. You have the essentials: Google Maps on Wear OS is excellent (you can navigate stand-alone with turn-by-turn on the watch, just like Apple Maps on Apple Watch). Spotify and YouTube Music allow offline downloads on Wear OS (just as they do on Apple Watch). Messaging apps like Telegram have watch apps, and there’s Google Keep for notes, Google Calendar, etc. One notable thing is Google’s own apps integrate well – e.g. you can get Gmail and Google Calendar notifications with some interactivity, and even third-party like Outlook has a Wear OS app. Samsung’s own apps on the watch include Samsung Health, Weather, Calendar, and others which are fine but often duplicate Google’s.

The FE being a Samsung device also means if you have other Samsung gear, it ties in: you can, for example, unlock your Samsung phone or tablet with the watch (Smart Lock feature), or use Samsung Wallet to store loyalty cards, boarding passes, etc., accessible on the watch. Samsung Wallet on the watch now also supports official IDs (in some regions) like drivers licenses and student IDs ^[149], similar to how Apple Wallet is adding digital IDs – but these are region-specific rollouts. For payments, you have a choice: Google Pay (now Google Wallet) or Samsung Pay – both should work widely for NFC payments, so that’s pretty convenient.

One of the coolest tricks of Samsung watches is the Camera Controller: with a compatible Samsung phone, you open the camera on your phone and a live preview appears on the watch, letting you snap photos or even switch modes remotely ^[150]. This is great for group shots or setting your phone down for a selfie – Apple has similar with its Camera Remote, but it only works with iPhones (and Apple Watch with iPhone). So each within its ecosystem has that covered.

Music and media: Both watches can connect Bluetooth headphones and play music directly. Apple Music vs Spotify aside, the experience is similar – you can go phone-free on a run with your buds and your watch streaming or playing stored songs. The Galaxy Watch FE has 16GB storage, which is enough for a few playlists, but Apple’s 32GB means you could store a LOT more songs or even some podcasts/audiobooks offline. If you use Spotify, both platforms’ apps allow downloads for Premium subscribers. If you prefer Apple Music, obviously that’s only on Apple Watch. If you prefer YouTube Music, that app is on Wear OS and not on Apple Watch (though you can airplay or use a web hack on Apple).

Maps and Navigation: Apple Watch’s maps will work only with Apple Maps (which is quite good in many cities, and it gives taptic feedback for turns). Galaxy Watch can use Google Maps – which is great because you can input a destination on the watch by voice or get directions that were sent from your phone. Google Maps on the watch can function standalone with LTE or Wi-Fi too. It can display a map view or just text directions.

Third-Party Ecosystem: Historically, Apple Watch had a larger share of dedicated apps (like bank apps, airline boarding pass apps, etc.), but Wear OS is catching up as more Android makers adopt it. Still, some niche or local apps might favor Apple Watch first. If you rely on say, a specific to-do list app, or a smart home app, check if they have a watchOS or Wear OS version. Many services now just send notifications which you can act on on either watch without a full app.

Finally, security and updates: Apple typically supports Apple Watches for many years with updates (the original SE (2020) can run watchOS 10 in 2023, for instance). The SE 3 launching with watchOS 26 likely will get at least 3–4 years of OS updates. Samsung promises about 3 years of Wear OS updates for watches. The FE shipped with Wear OS 4 (One UI Watch 5); it should get Wear OS 5 (which launched with Watch7) and likely Wear OS 6 down the line. However, being a lower-tier device, it might not get as many feature additions. Also, app performance may degrade if future OS becomes more demanding on the old W920 chip. Apple’s S10 in SE 3 has horsepower to spare (S9 was already quite fast), so it’s likely to handle new features for a while.

In summary, watchOS vs Wear OS: If you’re in the Apple world, the SE 3 brings all the conveniences of that tight integration – it’s almost an inevitability that an iPhone user will have a great experience with it. If you’re an Android user, the Galaxy Watch FE (and Wear OS) offers more choice in services (Google or Samsung) and good integration especially if you’re also on Google’s ecosystem. But some of Samsung’s key features are limited to Samsung’s own phones, which slightly fractures the otherwise broad compatibility of Wear OS. Both watches can keep you connected and handle the daily essentials – texts, calls, payments, music, voice commands – with relative ease. It’s truly your phone’s best friend on the wrist, whichever you choose, as long as you stay within the respective walled garden.

Performance and Battery Life in Real-World Use

On paper, battery life claims often don’t match real life – and that’s evident with these two watches. Apple Watch SE 3 sticks to Apple’s honest but modest claim of ~18 hours per charge ^[151]. In testing, users consistently get a full day of normal use: e.g. 7am to midnight with a workout and notifications is fine, but you’ll likely want to drop it on the charger each night or at least by the next morning. The good news is the SE 3 has fast charging (finally, for an SE). With the included USB-C puck and a 20W+ adapter, you can juice it up very quickly – around 80% in 45 minutes ^[152]. Practically, this means even if you use it overnight for sleep tracking, a quick 15-minute charge while you shower can add ~8 hours of wear time ^[153]. This fast-charge ability is a game changer for those who want to wear the watch 24/7; you no longer have to leave it charging for multiple hours. The S10 chip is also more power-efficient than older chips, and Apple likely tuned watchOS to maintain that all-day life despite adding the always-on display (which inherently uses more power). Many reviewers noted that Apple’s 18-hour rating is conservative – you might squeeze 20+ hours if you turn off always-on or have light usage. And in Low Power Mode (disabling things like always-on and background heart sensors), you can extend it to 2 days albeit with reduced functionality.

Samsung Galaxy Watch FE’s battery life is a bit of a letdown relative to Samsung’s marketing. Samsung touted “up to 40 hours” for the FE ^[154], but that figure likely assumes a very minimal use case (no always-on display, perhaps a lot of idle time, maybe night mode on). In real-world mixed usage, multiple reviewers found it didn’t last much more than 20–24 hours. The Verge managed about 24 hours with always-on off and using power-saving mode occasionally ^[155]. Android Authority reported barely making it from wake to wake if you track sleep, saying “if I go to bed with anything less than 30%… I’m guaranteed to wake up to a dead watch” ^[156]. That suggests around 1 day max unless you top up. Essentially, the FE’s 247 mAh battery is the same small size as the Watch4’s, but its aging Exynos W920 chip isn’t as efficient as newer chips, and the watch might be doing more (One UI Watch 5, etc.) that drains it. If you enable the always-on display, expect closer to 18 hours or less on the FE – meaning it definitely won’t span two full days.

Charging on the Galaxy Watch FE is also comparatively slow. It uses standard Qi wireless charging (WPC-based), not the faster charging that the Watch5 series introduced. To go from near empty to full might take around 1.5 to 2 hours on its puck. There’s no quick boost like Apple’s 8-hour in 15-min claim. This means if you forget to charge it in the morning, the FE might not be as forgiving – you’d need a longer sit on the charger. One workaround is to drop it on a charger during daily routines (desk time, etc.) or use a phone with reverse wireless charging (some Galaxy phones can charge the watch on their back). Still, it’s clear battery life is a weak spot for the FE, which is ironic given Samsung frames it as a holistic wellness device (sleep tracking is hard if you have to charge it often).

Now, performance: Apple’s S10 chip is a beast in the SE 3. It’s not a brand-new design (it’s basically the S9 from 2023 rebranded, since Apple didn’t introduce an S11 in 2025 ^[157]), but that S9/S10 was a huge jump over previous generations – Apple claimed 60% faster than the S8. In use, the Apple Watch SE 3 feels snappy: apps open quickly, animations are smooth, and new features like the double-tap gesture (tapping thumb and finger to answer calls or play/pause – something Apple introduced with Series 9 and now enabled on SE 3) work seamlessly ^[158]. The SE 3 can handle everything the Series 11 can, including on-device Siri processing and the latest watchOS UI effects (like the new Liquid Glass interface aesthetic ^[159]). There’s no sluggishness swiping through widgets or launching workouts. It helps that watchOS is fine-tuned for Apple’s hardware and doesn’t allow any super heavy processes that could lag it.

The Galaxy Watch FE’s performance, by contrast, got mixed reviews. The Exynos W920 was fine in 2021, but by 2024/25 it’s been eclipsed by Qualcomm’s Snapdragon W5+ (in some Wear OS watches) and by Samsung’s own slight W930 in Watch6/7. In everyday use, the FE handles simple tasks well – swiping through tiles (widgets), checking notifications, starting workouts – generally okay. But more demanding actions cause stutters: for example, launching a heavier app or downloading updates might show some lag. The Verge explicitly noted “noticeably laggy performance” and that it feels exactly like using a Galaxy Watch4 (which tracks, since it’s the same CPU/RAM) ^{[160] [161]}. It’s not unusable by any means – many users who only do basic things might not mind a slight delay here or there. But it’s worth knowing you’re not getting the buttery smooth experience of say a Galaxy Watch6 or Pixel Watch 2.

One particular pain point can be third-party apps on the FE. Some Wear OS apps (like messaging or fitness apps) are optimized for newer chips, and on W920 they can be slow to load. The 1.5GB RAM is actually a plus over Apple’s 1GB, but watchOS is lighter weight than Wear OS. The FE’s performance might also degrade if you have a lot of health tracking happening simultaneously (e.g., continuous HR, stress, and a workout and music playing). It’s juggling more tasks and frankly, Wear OS isn’t as lean as watchOS.

That said, for day-to-day quick glances, music control, and notifications, the FE is fine. Where you might feel it is when you compare side by side with something like Apple’s smooth 60fps-like animations or a newer Samsung watch. One saving grace: because the FE has a lower-res 396×396 screen (which is actually higher pixel density but smaller area), it’s not pushing as many pixels as larger watches, so W920 can keep up decently. Also, One UI Watch is designed to mask loading with neat animations or delays that aren’t too jarring.

In terms of connectivity performance, both do well. Bluetooth connections are stable for calls and music. GPS performance on Apple Watch is excellent – it gets a fix quickly and tracks routes accurately. On Galaxy Watch FE, GPS is good but not class-leading; without dual-band, urban canyons might throw it off a bit or take a bit longer to lock, but for most users it’s serviceable (the antenna design is proven from Watch4).

Heat and thermal throttling aren’t major issues for either, since they’re relatively low-power devices. But if you run a long workout with LTE streaming on the SE 3, you might see battery drain faster (and it might feel slightly warm on charge). The FE’s battery drain under heavy use (GPS + music + screen on) can be quite steep too – don’t expect more than 5-6 hours of continuous GPS tracking (which is okay for a marathon but not an ultramarathon – those are territory of more specialized Garmin or Ultra watches).

In summary, Apple Watch SE 3 shines in performance – it feels modern and fast due to the S10 chip and Apple’s optimizations. Its battery life is merely average but manageable thanks to fast charging and power-saving options if needed. Galaxy Watch FE stumbles in performance by current standards – it’s adequate but clearly last-gen, and it absolutely requires daily charging (if not more with heavy use). Many tech reviewers feel Samsung should have put a newer chip or bigger battery in the FE to truly make it a strong value; as it stands, the FE’s performance/battery are passable, not outstanding for 2025. One Android Police commentary put it bluntly: “FE feels less like a deal and more like overpaying for a ‘new’ Galaxy Watch 4.” ^[162] That sums up that it didn’t improve upon the weaknesses of the Watch4 (battery life) and only partially addresses durability (adding sapphire). Apple, on the other hand, by giving the SE 3 the S10 chip, ensured its budget watch doesn’t feel budget in day-to-day use – a big win for consumers.

Expert and Consumer Reviews

Both of these watches have been analyzed by tech experts and early adopters, and the consensus is telling. Let’s look at what reviewers and users have said, in their own words, about the Apple Watch SE 3 and Samsung Galaxy Watch FE:

• Apple Watch SE 3: Critics have lauded Apple for trickling down premium features to the SE. “Apple’s biggest smartwatch upgrades arrive on its cheapest model this year,” Macworld wrote, emphasizing that SE 3 gained an always-on display, the S10 chip, and advanced health metrics in one swoop ^{[163] [164]}. “At this point, more casual users can safely opt for the budget-friendly model — without nearly as much fear of missing out,” the review added ^[165]. That sentiment is echoed widely: for most people, the SE 3 does everything you need. The Verge’s event coverage highlighted that the SE 3 “gets a lot of new trickle-down features from pricier Apple Watches”, summarizing it as “Not bad for an SE.” ^{[166] [167]}. Many noted that Apple kept the price the same ($249) despite the additions. On the flip side, because it’s so close to the flagship Series, some lamented the lack of just a couple features: “It left out features like an always-on display and sensors for EKG and blood oxygen. Of those…, the SE 3 now at least gets the temperature sensor,” The Verge noted ^[168]. In other words, ECG and SpO₂ are the only notable absences, which some consumers don’t mind given the price. Users who bought SE 3 report high satisfaction, especially if they were coming from an older Watch or first time: it’s speedy, the battery meets their needs, and it “feels like a steal” compared to Apple’s more expensive models. The only common user gripe is simply that it’s an iterative design (it doesn’t look new compared to older ones) – but that’s a minor concern when you’re wearing a case or different band anyway.
• Samsung Galaxy Watch FE: The reception here has been more lukewarm. The Verge’s review titled “a bogus bargain” pulled no punches: “As an entry-level device, the FE doesn’t nail the right mix of price, features, and hardware,” wrote reviewer Victoria Song ^[169]. The main complaints were that Samsung cut the wrong corners. Battery life and speed came under fire, with The Verge noting they only got 18–20 hours on normal use and that the watch stuttered in ways a new product shouldn’t ^{[170] [171]}. Android Authority’s Ryan Haines was similarly underwhelmed, saying “it’s a Galaxy Watch4 in 2024” and listing “Poor battery life, tiny display with thick bezels, aging processor” among cons ^[172]. His quip – “Galaxy Watch FE walks like a Galaxy Watch4 and talks like a Galaxy Watch4 because it is a Galaxy Watch4” – went viral in summarizing the device ^[173]. On the positive side, reviewers did praise what Samsung did include: all those high-end health features at $199. Tom’s Guide noted, “It has the same BioActive sensor found in the Galaxy Watch6… offers ECG and BIA scans — features usually reserved for more expensive watches”, calling the health and fitness capabilities a good value ^[174]. TechRadar’s review described the FE as “one of the most confusing smartwatches… It’s a perfectly fine smartwatch that’s hard to recommend when Samsung’s own older watches do more for around the same price on sale”, highlighting the context that a Galaxy Watch5 or 6 (40mm) often could be found for $219-$249 with better specs ^{[175] [176]}. Consumers who bought the Galaxy Watch FE seem divided. Some casual users (especially those who got it with a bundle or discount) are pleased: they mention it “does everything I need it to and does it well” and that styling is nice for a low price. A Best Buy customer review echoed many, saying the only drawback is “the sort of short battery life, but even then, it will last you all day” ^[177]. Users coming from older Samsung watches or looking for ECG on a budget are generally satisfied. However, more tech-savvy users or those upgrading from Watch5/6 are disappointed – they expected more refinement. On Reddit, one user compiled their impressions: “Too slow. Health tracking performance is not that great. Abysmal battery life. It has the worst value…” ^[178] (though some Redditors debated that last point, since at $199 it was still cheaper than any Apple Watch or Pixel Watch alternative).

In essence, expert reviews crown the Apple Watch SE 3 as a category leader for affordable smartwatches, whereas the Galaxy Watch FE is seen as a compromise-laden attempt by Samsung to fill a niche. The FE certainly isn’t a failure – it still gets the job done for many – but it “misses the mark” of what a true Fan Edition could’ve been ^[179]. Samsung likely wanted to reuse existing parts to hit a price point, and it achieved that, but at the cost of making a device that feels a bit stale on arrival. Apple, conversely, took recent tech and put it in an older chassis, resulting in a device that feels modern where it counts (performance, features) even if it’s not flashy or new in design.

For someone reading these reviews and quotes, it’s clear: if you’re platform-agnostic and just want the better watch, Apple Watch SE 3 has the edge in most areas – provided you have an iPhone. If you’re on Android, the Galaxy Watch FE is an okay pick if budget is tight, but many experts might nudge you to get a Galaxy Watch6 on sale or even consider the competing Pixel Watch (or upcoming models).

Value for Money and Who Should Buy Which

Choosing between the Apple Watch SE 3 and Samsung Galaxy Watch FE ultimately comes down to your phone ecosystem and your priorities. Both aim to deliver maximum value at a lower price, but one makes a stronger case than the other.

Apple Watch SE 3 – “All-new essentials at a great price” (as Apple’s marketing aptly puts it): For iPhone users, the SE 3 is the go-to if you don’t need the absolute cutting-edge bells and whistles like an ECG or an always-on altimeter (useful for hikers) or the blood oxygen app. At $249, it’s significantly cheaper than Apple’s flagship watches (which start around $399) while delivering 90% of the functionality. In fact, the SE 3 now has the same processing power and many of the same new features as the $399 Series 11 ^{[180] [181]}, making it a bit of a sweet spot. This watch is best for:

• First-time smartwatch buyers with an iPhone: If you’ve never owned a smartwatch, the SE 3 gives you the full Apple Watch experience with minimal compromise. It’s simple enough to not overwhelm, but powerful enough to keep you satisfied as you explore more apps and features.
• Users on a budget or gifting a watch: The SE 3 is often recommended for teenagers, college students, or as a gift to a parent/grandparent who has an iPhone. It has all the important safety features (fall detection, SOS) and health monitoring basics, making it great for family use.
• Those with older Apple Watches (Series 3, 4, maybe even 5) looking to upgrade inexpensively: The jump in performance and features will be huge, and you don’t have to pay top dollar for the Series 11 or Ultra. The SE 3 gives you modern specs (and even future-proof 5G) that will last years.
• Fitness and health enthusiasts (non-pro): If you run, gym, or do classes and just want reliable tracking and the motivational Apple ecosystem, the SE 3 is perfect. Serious athletes might want features like ECG or more endurance (found in higher models or Garmins), but the vast majority of users find everything they need here.

Is there anyone it’s not for? Perhaps hardcore techies who want every sensor – they might feel the absence of the ECG or SpO₂, or the less bright screen (the Series and Ultra have brighter displays which are easier to see in direct sun, though SE 3 is still decent at around 1000 nits). Also, those who love premium materials – the SE 3 only comes in aluminum, no steel or titanium options. But these are niche concerns. For most, the value for money on SE 3 is outstanding, reflected in quotes like “an incredible value… supports more people to live a healthier life” ^[182].

Samsung Galaxy Watch FE – Affordable gateway or false economy? This watch is a bit of a paradox. On one hand, at $199 it’s one of the cheapest full-featured smartwatches from a major brand. It has features that even $400+ Apple Watches don’t (BP monitoring, body composition). It undercuts Apple by $50 for the base model ^[183], which is significant for budget buyers. For Android users, especially those with Samsung phones, it’s positioned as a no-brainer budget pick. It’s best for:

• Samsung Galaxy phone owners who want a cheap smartwatch: If you have a Galaxy phone and want to leverage the ECG, BP, and tight integration (camera control, Samsung Health syncing), the FE is the cheapest entry point. It’s basically a Galaxy Watch experience without paying for the latest model. It will feel cohesive in the Samsung ecosystem – e.g., Samsung Health on phone and watch syncing your data, and One UI Watch interface feeling familiar.
• Health-conscious users on Android who can’t stretch to a Watch6/7 or Pixel Watch: The FE gives you advanced health metrics at a budget price. Someone focusing on weight loss might love the body composition tool; someone with AFib risk might value the ECG. At $199, it democratizes features that used to be in pricier wearables (with the caveat of the Samsung phone requirement for some).
• Those who prioritize classic watch looks and small size: The FE’s design might appeal more than Apple’s to someone who likes a traditional round watch and a smaller, unobtrusive device. It doesn’t scream “tech gadget” as much as the Apple Watch can, so some might consider it more stylish or appropriate to wear to work, etc., especially in the Silver or Pink Gold finishes that can be dressed up with a leather strap.

However, the value proposition of the Galaxy Watch FE is a bit contentious. For one, its biggest competitor might be Samsung’s own other models. Often you can find the Galaxy Watch4 (virtually same device sans sapphire) or Watch5 on sale for less, or the Watch6 for just a bit more. If a Watch6 (with a newer chip, bigger screen, better battery) is say $249 on sale, many would argue it’s worth the extra $50 over the FE. In markets like India or Europe, Samsung also has aggressive deals bundling watches with phones (some got the FE free with phone purchases, etc., which is great for them). But at retail price, some reviewers called the FE “a tough sell” ^[184] unless it sees discounts.

Another group who might consider the FE are Android users who looked longingly at Apple Watch SE. Since Apple Watch doesn’t work with Android, the FE is conceptually Samsung’s answer to the SE. But was it a strong answer? Partially – it nailed the feature list, but faltered on the execution with battery and speed. So if you’re an Android user wanting a super-smooth experience, you might look at the Google Pixel Watch 2/3 or upcoming models, albeit those cost more ($349+ new). If $200 is your absolute max, the FE is really one of the only games in town for full Wear OS (other than older TicWatches or Amazfit’s Zepp OS devices which lack many features).

In terms of longevity, the FE might not age as well. Its 16GB storage and older internals mean it could feel slow with future updates, and its battery is already stressed. Apple’s SE 3, with a stronger chip, likely will hold performance longer and also hold resale value better (Apple Watches in general do okay on resale relative to most Android wearables).

Who wins the value battle? If you’re in the Apple camp, the SE 3 is clearly a winner – Apple essentially brought its entry watch from “pretty good” to “nearly great” with this 2025 refresh. For Android, the FE is an interesting value but not a slam dunk. It’s more of a budget compromise – you save money, but you will be dealing with shorter battery life and older tech daily. Some budget buyers are okay with that, others might prefer to spend a bit more for a better daily experience.

To put it another way: Apple Watch SE 3 is the best smartwatch under $300 for iPhone users – it’s even sufficient for many who might have bought the higher model, thus delivering tremendous bang for buck. Samsung Galaxy Watch FE is one of the cheapest smartwatches around $200 with advanced health features, but it’s a small step behind the best experience you can get on Android for not a huge amount more money.

Upcoming Smartwatches in Late 2025 and 2026

The smartwatch space is continually evolving, and late 2025 into early 2026 promises some exciting new entries from Apple, Samsung, and others. Based on verified leaks and announcements, here’s a peek at what’s on the horizon:

• Apple’s Next Moves: Having launched Series 11, Ultra 3, and SE 3 in 2025, Apple’s 2026 lineup will likely bring the Apple Watch Series 12 in the fall. While details are sparse, tech insiders hint at possible bigger changes. One long-rumored upgrade is the switch to microLED displays for the Apple Watch. MicroLED tech could offer even brighter, more efficient screens with better durability (no burn-in). Initially, it was believed an Apple Watch Ultra might debut microLED in 2025, but latest reports suggest Apple’s microLED watch project was delayed to 2026 or 2027 ^{[185] [186]}. If microLED isn’t ready by Series 12, Apple might focus on other improvements: perhaps a new S11 chip (if they resume annual chip updates) with more AI capabilities, further battery optimization, or new health sensors. There’s ongoing R&D in Cupertino on non-invasive blood glucose monitoring (for diabetes management) – a holy grail feature – though it’s not expected as a product this soon. We might see smaller additions like improved Bluetooth (LE Audio support), new ultra-wideband chips (U2) if not already present, and of course new watchOS features (watchOS 27) to leverage any new hardware. Apple could also expand the Apple Watch Ultra line. The Ultra 3 in 2025 was a modest update after a year gap – it gained 5G and even introduced satellite connectivity for SOS in emergencies ^[187]. Rumors suggest Apple might skip 2026 for an Ultra update (keeping a two-year cadence), which could mean an Ultra 4 in 2027 possibly with the microLED display and perhaps even more battery life or a new sensor. However, if component timelines accelerate, a 2026 Ultra with microLED isn’t off the table ^[188]. Also, keep an eye on any special edition: 2025 marked the 10th anniversary of Apple Watch (the first released in 2015), and there was talk of an “Apple Watch X” redesign in the works. If that didn’t materialize in Series 11, it could show up in Series 12 or 13 with a thinner case or new band mechanism (one rumor was Apple exploring magnetic band attachments to save internal space currently used by the slide-in lugs). Essentially, for Apple in late 2025/2026: expect Series 12 with incremental improvements (maybe new materials or colors too) and possibly teasers of microLED tech or other ambitious health features on the horizon. Apple usually keeps SE updates to every two years, so likely no new SE until 2027 given SE 3 just launched.
• Samsung’s Next Galaxy Watches: Samsung has been iterating annually on its Galaxy Watch series. In July 2025, Samsung introduced the Galaxy Watch8 and Watch8 Classic alongside a slight refresh of the Galaxy Watch Ultra. Yes, Samsung launched its first Galaxy Watch Ultra in late 2024 (with a rugged design and large battery to compete with Apple’s Ultra). In 2025, a Galaxy Watch Ultra (2nd gen) came with minor tweaks – reportedly an extra color (Titanium Blue) and double the storage to 64GB, but otherwise similar to the original ^[189]. According to Android Central, the 2025 Ultra was basically a cosmetic update, leading many to anticipate a more substantial Galaxy Watch Ultra 2026 model ^{[190] [191]}. By 2026, Samsung could introduce an Ultra with more significant changes: possibly a larger display or different size options, more durable materials, and definitely battery improvements. One exciting prospect: new battery technology. A report from Wareable hinted that Samsung is working on incorporating solid-state batteries in wearables, potentially by the time of the Galaxy Watch 9 (if named that) ^[192]. Solid-state batteries could dramatically increase energy density and safety, meaning a much longer-lasting watch or a thinner design for the same life. If mass production of such cells comes in 2026, the Galaxy Watch 9 or Ultra might be among the first to benefit ^[193]. As for the Galaxy Watch 9 (expected summer 2026 if numbering continues), we can expect Samsung to continue the pattern of alternating focus: since Watch8 (2025) brought back the Classic rotating bezel, the 2026 cycle might refresh the Ultra more and possibly drop the “Classic” again – but this is speculative. Likely upgrades for Watch9 series include a new Exynos W980 or W990 chip (Samsung needs a new chip to catch up to Qualcomm’s W5 Gen chips), more RAM/storage, maybe integrating a UWB chip (ultra-wideband) to support precise tracking and Digital Key features like unlocking cars (something Apple and even Google are doing with UWB in wearables). Also, Samsung may add or improve sensors – e.g., could we see a skin temperature sensor finally on all models? (They added temperature on Watch5, so FE lacked it, but by Watch9 they might refine uses for it, like stress or recovery tracking). Another device to watch: Galaxy Ring. Samsung teased a smart ring (codenamed “Galaxy Ring”) in development, aiming for a 2024/2025 release ^[194]. If it hasn’t launched by late 2025, it could come in 2026. A Galaxy Ring would be a finger-worn fitness and health tracker (like Oura ring competitor) that might work in tandem with Galaxy Watches or standalone. While not a smartwatch per se, it indicates Samsung’s interest in broadening wearable form factors, and could be part of their ecosystem for health monitoring.
• Google and the Pixel Watch series: Google’s Pixel Watch made a splash as a showcase of Wear OS’s potential. By late 2025, Google has unveiled the Pixel Watch 4 (yes, they leapfrogged numbering a bit; 2023 brought Pixel Watch 2, and in 2024 Pixel Watch 3, so 2025 sees Pixel Watch 4). The Pixel Watch 4, announced August 2025 and shipping by October, is Google’s biggest update yet ^{[195] [196]}. It features a completely redesigned, larger domed display with much thinner bezels (finally addressing the chunky bezels of earlier models) ^[197]. The screen is a first-of-its-kind “Actua 360” OLED that’s 3000 nits bright (50% brighter than Pixel Watch 3) ^[198], making it one of the most readable in sunlight. Impressively, the Pixel Watch 4 is also the first smartwatch to offer standalone satellite communication for emergency SOS – similar to Apple’s Emergency SOS via satellite on iPhones and Ultra, Pixel Watch 4 can send an SOS message when you have no cell coverage, a potential lifesaver for hikers ^{[199] [200]}. It runs on a new Snapdragon W5 Gen 2 chip with a co-processor, which Google says gives 25% longer battery life – up to 30 hours on the small 41mm and 40 hours on the larger 45mm model ^{[201] [202]}. This, plus a faster charge (0–50% in 15 min) ^[203], shows big strides in Wear OS endurance, something Samsung will likely aim to match. The Pixel Watch 4 also integrates Google’s latest AI (Gemini AI) for smarter Assistant and on-watch features ^[204], and notably, it’s user-serviceable with a replaceable battery and screen – a nod to longevity and sustainability ^[205]. Looking ahead, if Pixel Watch 4 is the late-2025 model, then by late 2026 we’d expect a Pixel Watch 5. No leaks yet, but trends suggest Google focusing on refining design (maybe offering more sizes or more rugged variants), adding more Fitbit-derived health features (Pixel Watch 4 already introduced pulse ox alerts and even a unique “loss of pulse” detection for cardiac arrest warnings ^[206]). Pixel Watch 5 might also bring integration with Google’s coming Gemini AI to do things like advanced health coaching or contextual assistance. Given Google’s push, Pixel watches are becoming a top competitor to Samsung’s for Android users.
• Other competitors:Garmin continues to dominate the hardcore fitness smartwatch segment. In late 2025/2026, Garmin is expected to release updates to their Fenix/Epix line (for multi-sport outdoors) and possibly a second-generation Garmin Venu 3 (their AMOLED smartwatch) or others. While Garmin’s aren’t direct competitors on “smart” features (they lack a wide app ecosystem and phone call support on most models), they appeal to serious athletes with multi-week battery life and very advanced training analytics. For example, a Garmin Fenix 8 or Epix 3 in 2026 might add even more physiological metrics (like advanced HRV stress, training load focus) and potentially features like satellite texting (Garmin owns inReach). We already see Apple and Google adding satellite SOS; Garmin might integrate their satellite tech directly into a watch eventually to stay ahead for adventurers. Fitbit (now Google-owned) likely won’t release more full smartwatches since Google has Pixel Watch, but they may update fitness bands or hybrid watches. Other brands like Huawei and Xiaomi continue to make Apple Watch lookalikes or Wear OS devices (Xiaomi’s Watch 2 Pro with Wear OS launched in 2023, so maybe a new one 2025/26). OnePlus could also try another smartwatch (the first OnePlus Watch was basic, but rumor is they might adopt Wear OS in a future model). Amazfit (Zepp) will likely have their GTR/GTS 5 series in 2025/26, offering budget-friendly smartwatches with long battery but not as feature-rich. They don’t challenge Apple/Samsung in ecosystem but do nibble at budget segment.

In terms of innovation, keep an eye on new sensors: Blood glucose monitoring is being researched by multiple companies (Apple, Alphabet via life sciences, etc.), but likely a few years off. Blood pressure without a cuff is something both Apple and Samsung have interest in – Samsung’s approach was to use the optical sensor with calibration, Apple might try a different tack. If either makes a breakthrough by 2026, that’d be a headline feature.

Also, AI integration is a big trend. Google is clearly integrating AI (Gemini) into Pixel Watch for smarter features. Apple might leverage its Neural Engines for more on-device AI (maybe gesture recognition like double-tap was just the start). We could see watches becoming more proactive – giving you health insights (“Hey, your resting heart rate is up 5% this week, you might be getting sick”) or intelligent coaching (“You’ve been stressed, how about a mindfulness session now?”). These kinds of features may roll out via software updates to existing hardware in late 2025/2026.

In summary for upcoming devices: Apple will refine and possibly revolutionize display tech in the next couple of years, Samsung is poised to improve battery tech and an Ultra watch, and Google is pushing the envelope with Pixel Watch’s design and safety features like satellite SOS ^[207]. For consumers, that means the smartwatch choice will only get better. But it also means the Apple Watch SE 3 and Galaxy Watch FE we compared today could feel entry-level in a year’s time. Even so, they both deliver a lot of value in 2025 – and knowing the upgrade cycles can help buyers decide. If you’re the type who upgrades often, an SE 3 now or a Watch FE now can be stopgaps until the next big thing. If you’re looking to keep a watch for 3-5 years, consider how these upcoming features might appeal to you.

One thing’s certain: the competition between Apple, Samsung, Google, and others will continue to drive innovation in late 2025 and 2026. That’s great news for all of us tracking our health and notifications on our wrists – the devices are getting more powerful, more helpful, and (hopefully) more battery-friendly as time goes on.

Conclusion

In this budget smartwatch face-off, Apple Watch SE 3 and Samsung Galaxy Watch FE each bring plenty to the table for their respective audiences. The Apple Watch SE 3 emerges as a standout choice for iPhone users, offering near-flagship performance and features at a fraction of the flagship price ^{[208] [209]}. It’s polished, powerful, and backed by an unrivaled app ecosystem – essentially “the budget Apple Watch that doesn’t feel budget at all.” Meanwhile, Samsung’s Galaxy Watch FE appeals as an Android-friendly value pick, packing in advanced health sensors (ECG, BP, BIA) typically unseen in this price tier ^[210]. It delivers the core Galaxy Watch experience for much less money – but not without some trade-offs in speed and endurance ^{[211] [212]}.

If you’re deep in the Apple ecosystem, the Watch SE 3 is almost a no-brainer – it nails the fundamentals (fitness, notifications, safety) and then some, lacking only a couple of niche extras ^[213]. For Android users – especially Samsung Galaxy phone owners – the Watch FE can be a rewarding purchase, just go in with eyes open about its “last-gen” quirks. In the end, each watch is the best budget option within its universe: the SE 3 for iOS, the FE for Android. They democratize many smartwatch features that were once premium-only, meaning more people can join the wearable tech lifestyle without breaking the bank.

Choosing between them is straightforward: go with the SE 3 if you have an iPhone ^[214]; go with the Galaxy Watch FE if you use Android and want Samsung’s take on Wear OS ^[215]. Either way, you’ll get a capable companion for your health and daily convenience – and with exciting new watches on the horizon in 2025/2026, you’ll be well-prepared in knowing what each brand offers when the time comes to upgrade again.

References

1. www.theverge.com, 2. fudzilla.com, 3. fudzilla.com, 4. www.theverge.com, 5. www.tomsguide.com, 6. www.tomsguide.com, 7. www.theverge.com, 8. www.samsungmobilepress.com, 9. www.apple.com, 10. www.apple.com, 11. www.samsungmobilepress.com, 12. www.apple.com, 13. www.samsungmobilepress.com, 14. www.samsungmobilepress.com, 15. www.samsungmobilepress.com, 16. www.apple.com, 17. www.theverge.com, 18. www.samsungmobilepress.com, 19. www.theverge.com, 20. www.apple.com, 21. www.apple.com, 22. www.tomsguide.com, 23. www.theverge.com, 24. www.theverge.com, 25. www.apple.com, 26. www.apple.com, 27. www.apple.com, 28. www.apple.com, 29. www.apple.com, 30. www.macworld.com, 31. www.samsungmobilepress.com, 32. www.samsungmobilepress.com, 33. www.macworld.com, 34. www.samsungmobilepress.com, 35. www.macworld.com, 36. www.apple.com, 37. www.apple.com, 38. www.apple.com, 39. www.samsungmobilepress.com, 40. www.samsungmobilepress.com, 41. www.samsungmobilepress.com, 42. www.samsungmobilepress.com, 43. www.apple.com, 44. www.theverge.com, 45. www.samsungmobilepress.com, 46. www.samsung.com, 47. www.apple.com, 48. www.apple.com, 49. www.apple.com, 50. fudzilla.com, 51. www.macworld.com, 52. www.androidauthority.com, 53. www.macworld.com, 54. www.theverge.com, 55. www.theverge.com, 56. www.androidauthority.com, 57. www.androidauthority.com, 58. www.androidauthority.com, 59. www.androidauthority.com, 60. www.theverge.com, 61. www.apple.com, 62. www.theverge.com, 63. www.tomsguide.com, 64. www.techradar.com, 65. www.techradar.com, 66. www.apple.com, 67. www.samsungmobilepress.com, 68. www.tomsguide.com, 69. www.apple.com, 70. www.samsungmobilepress.com, 71. www.samsungmobilepress.com, 72. www.samsungmobilepress.com, 73. www.apple.com, 74. www.samsungmobilepress.com, 75. www.apple.com, 76. www.samsungmobilepress.com, 77. www.samsung.com, 78. www.apple.com, 79. www.apple.com, 80. www.samsungmobilepress.com, 81. fudzilla.com, 82. www.apple.com, 83. www.apple.com, 84. www.macworld.com, 85. www.samsungmobilepress.com, 86. www.samsungmobilepress.com, 87. www.samsungmobilepress.com, 88. www.apple.com, 89. www.apple.com, 90. www.apple.com, 91. www.apple.com, 92. www.samsungmobilepress.com, 93. www.samsungmobilepress.com, 94. www.samsungmobilepress.com, 95. www.samsungmobilepress.com, 96. www.samsungmobilepress.com, 97. www.apple.com, 98. www.samsungmobilepress.com, 99. www.apple.com, 100. www.samsungmobilepress.com, 101. www.samsungmobilepress.com, 102. www.samsungmobilepress.com, 103. www.apple.com, 104. www.apple.com, 105. www.tomsguide.com, 106. www.theverge.com, 107. www.tomsguide.com, 108. www.apple.com, 109. www.samsungmobilepress.com, 110. www.samsungmobilepress.com, 111. www.apple.com, 112. www.apple.com, 113. www.samsungmobilepress.com, 114. www.samsungmobilepress.com, 115. www.tomsguide.com, 116. www.tomsguide.com, 117. www.theverge.com, 118. www.theverge.com, 119. www.androidauthority.com, 120. www.androidauthority.com, 121. www.tomsguide.com, 122. www.samsungmobilepress.com, 123. www.samsungmobilepress.com, 124. www.samsungmobilepress.com, 125. www.apple.com, 126. www.samsungmobilepress.com, 127. www.theverge.com, 128. www.samsungmobilepress.com, 129. www.macworld.com, 130. www.apple.com, 131. www.apple.com, 132. www.apple.com, 133. www.macworld.com, 134. www.apple.com, 135. www.apple.com, 136. www.apple.com, 137. www.apple.com, 138. www.apple.com, 139. www.samsungmobilepress.com, 140. www.samsung.com, 141. www.xda-developers.com, 142. www.samsungmobilepress.com, 143. www.samsungmobilepress.com, 144. www.samsungmobilepress.com, 145. www.samsungmobilepress.com, 146. www.samsungmobilepress.com, 147. www.apple.com, 148. www.theverge.com, 149. www.samsungmobilepress.com, 150. www.samsungmobilepress.com, 151. www.apple.com, 152. www.apple.com, 153. www.apple.com, 154. www.tomsguide.com, 155. www.theverge.com, 156. www.androidauthority.com, 157. www.macworld.com, 158. www.theverge.com, 159. www.apple.com, 160. www.theverge.com, 161. www.theverge.com, 162. www.theverge.com, 163. www.macworld.com, 164. www.macworld.com, 165. www.macworld.com, 166. www.theverge.com, 167. www.theverge.com, 168. www.theverge.com, 169. www.theverge.com, 170. www.theverge.com, 171. www.theverge.com, 172. www.androidauthority.com, 173. www.androidauthority.com, 174. www.tomsguide.com, 175. www.androidauthority.com, 176. www.androidauthority.com, 177. www.bestbuy.com, 178. www.reddit.com, 179. www.theverge.com, 180. www.theverge.com, 181. www.macworld.com, 182. www.apple.com, 183. www.tomsguide.com, 184. www.androidauthority.com, 185. mfixxo.com, 186. www.microled-info.com, 187. www.macworld.com, 188. www.techadvisor.com, 189. www.techadvisor.com, 190. www.androidcentral.com, 191. www.androidpolice.com, 192. www.wareable.com, 193. www.wareable.com, 194. www.techradar.com, 195. www.phonearena.com, 196. www.dcrainmaker.com, 197. blog.google, 198. blog.google, 199. blog.google, 200. blog.google, 201. blog.google, 202. blog.google, 203. blog.google, 204. blog.google, 205. blog.google, 206. blog.google, 207. blog.google, 208. www.macworld.com, 209. www.macworld.com, 210. www.tomsguide.com, 211. www.theverge.com, 212. www.androidauthority.com, 213. www.theverge.com, 214. www.apple.com, 215. www.samsungmobilepress.com