Garmin Venu 4 Shines Bright: Wellness Coach, Flashlight & Big Upgrades to Rival Apple Watch

Official Unveiling: Garmin officially announced the Venu 4 (and its 41mm variant often dubbed the Venu 4S) on September 17, 2025 wareable.com. It’s a fourth-generation premium fitness smartwatch focused on holistic health tracking and daily coaching.
New Hardware & Design: Features a sleek metal case (in 45mm and 41mm sizes) with a built-in LED flashlight, plus a speaker and microphone for calls and voice assistant use wareable.com nasdaq.com. Notably, the Venu 4 has two side buttons (down from three on the Venu 3) to complement its AMOLED touchscreen tomsguide.com.
Health & Wellness Upgrades: Introduces Health Status trend monitoring (tracking metrics like heart rate variability, respiration, skin temperature, etc. overnight) to alert users of deviations that might indicate illness or overtraining wareable.com. A new Lifestyle Logging feature lets you record caffeine/alcohol intake and see how these habits impact sleep, stress, and HRV wareable.com. The Venu 4 also adds Sleep Alignment and Sleep Consistency metrics to help users sync with their circadian rhythm and maintain regular sleep patterns wareable.com. An on-device ECG app finally arrives on the Venu series as well, for spot-checking heart rhythms and detecting AFib, matching rivals like Apple and Fitbit notebookcheck.net.
Fitness & Training Features: Launches Garmin Fitness Coach, delivering personalized daily workouts for 25+ activities (beyond the run/cycle focus of prior models) tomsguide.com nasdaq.com. New sport profiles include a “mixed session” multi-activity mode (great for triathlon brick workouts) wareable.com, auto track run detection, and advanced training tools from Garmin’s higher-end watches (Training Load, Training Readiness, race time predictors, etc.) dcrainmaker.com dcrainmaker.com. It also supports multi-band GPS for improved accuracy and expanded sensor compatibility (e.g. cycling power meters, safety radars) – essentially packing many of the Forerunner 570’s capabilities into a lifestyle watch dcrainmaker.com dcrainmaker.com.
Battery Life: Boasts multi-day battery endurance – up to 12 days in smartwatch mode for the 45mm model (down slightly from Venu 3’s 14 days) and 10 days for the 41mm model wareable.com. With the always-on display active it’s around 4 days, and you get ~20 hours of continuous GPS (17–19 hours using the more accurate multi-band mode) on a charge tomsguide.com. This significantly outlasts typical daily-charge smartwatches like the Apple Watch.
Pricing & Availability:Price starts at $549.99 in the U.S. (￡469.99 in the UK, €549.99 in EU) for both 45mm and 41mm sizes with a silicone band tomsguide.com notebookcheck.net. Models that include a leather strap are priced higher at $599.99/£519.99/€599.99 notebookcheck.net. The Venu 4 series hits retail on September 22, 2025, and is positioned as a premium mid-range smartwatch in Garmin’s lineup wareable.com.
Competition: Garmin is squarely aiming the Venu 4 at mainstream rivals. It’s designed to compete directly with top smartwatches like the Apple Watch (Series 9/Series 11) and Samsung Galaxy Watch (Series 6–8) wareable.com, by offering far superior battery life and a more comprehensive fitness suite tomsguide.com. It also takes on health-centric wearables like the Fitbit Sense 2 by adding features such as ECG, stress tracking, and personalized guidance without requiring a subscription.
Related Releases: The smaller 41mm model (Venu 4 in 41mm) shares all the same features, effectively serving as the new “Venu 4S.” Garmin also announced other wearables alongside Venu 4 – notably the rugged Instinct Crossover AMOLED ($649) and a kid-focused Bounce 2 smartwatch ($299) – as part of a broader refresh of its lineup bloomberg.com.

Garmin Venu 4 Officially Launches: Overview

In a surprise fall announcement, Garmin unveiled the Venu 4 and Venu 4S, a major update to its popular Venu line of smartwatches wareable.com. The Venu 4 represents Garmin’s fourth-generation model in this series and doubles down on the brand’s wellness-first focus. It was introduced as a “personal on-wrist coach” aimed at helping users not only track their fitness, but also understand and improve their overall health habits nasdaq.com. Garmin’s launch event on September 17, 2025 highlighted a host of new features – from advanced sleep and recovery insights to a built-in flashlight – all packaged in a stylish redesign. Priced at a premium $549.99, the Venu 4 is positioned as a mid-tier offering in Garmin’s lineup that bridges the gap between high-end athletic watches and everyday smartwatches wareable.com. It arrives in stores on September 22, 2025, just in time to challenge the latest models from Apple, Samsung, and others for the title of best smartwatch of the year wareable.com.

This launch continues a blockbuster year for Garmin’s wearables. The company has refreshed nearly all its core product lines in 2025 – from the Forerunner 970/570 in spring to the premium Venu X1 in summer – and now the Venu 4 brings significant upgrades to the more affordable “lifestyle” smartwatch segment wareable.com. Below, we dive into everything new in the Garmin Venu 4, including its design changes, new health and fitness features, how it stacks up against the previous Venu 3 and key competitors like the Apple Watch, and what it means for consumers and the broader wearable market.

Design and Hardware Updates: Sleeker Build, Flashlight in Tow

Garmin Venu 4 comes in two sizes (45mm and 41mm) and multiple color options, each featuring a new sleek metal case, AMOLED touchscreen, and the much-anticipated LED flashlight built into the top of the watch.

Visually, the Garmin Venu 4 doesn’t stray far from its predecessor’s formula, but it does bring some notable design refinements. The watch now sports a slim, round metal casing – whereas the Venu 3 only had a metal bezel – giving it a more premium feel akin to Garmin’s higher-end models dcrainmaker.com dcrainmaker.com. Two case sizes are available: a 45 mm version with a 1.4-inch display, and a smaller 41 mm version with a 1.2-inch display notebookcheck.net. (Garmin has effectively dropped the “S” moniker this generation; both are simply called Venu 4, though many refer to the 41mm as the Venu 4S for clarity garminrumors.com.) Each model has identical features and comes in a variety of colorways: for example, the 45mm can be had in Slate/Black, Silver/Citron, etc., while the 41mm offers choices like Lunar Gold/Bone, Silver/Periwinkle, and more phonearena.com phonearena.com. Garmin is also offering configurations with leather bands in the box for a $50 premium over the standard silicone strap tomsguide.com notebookcheck.net.

One of the headline additions is the built-in LED flashlight – a feature borrowed from Garmin’s hardcore adventure watches (like the Fenix and Enduro series) now trickling down to the sleeker Venu line wareable.com wareable.com. The LED light is cleverly integrated at the top of the watch face, acting as a handy torch for low-light situations or safety during nighttime workouts. Garmin even includes a red light mode (presumably to preserve night vision), as seen on its other flashlight-equipped models dcrainmaker.com. This unexpected but practical addition drew immediate excitement, with one reviewer calling it “a killer feature that adds genuine, everyday utility” to the Venu 4 wareable.com.

The Venu 4’s case is not only more stylish but also more functional. It retains the AMOLED touchscreen with always-on option, protected by Gorilla Glass (exact specs TBD), and it now has only two physical buttons on the side (down from three on Venu 3) tomsguide.com. Garmin has removed the third button to streamline the look, meaning users will rely a bit more on touch navigation than before. Inside, the watch gains improved GPS hardware – it now supports multi-band (dual-frequency) GNSS for enhanced location accuracy, which is great for runners or hikers in challenging environments dcrainmaker.com. The Venu 4 also comes equipped with the expected suite of sensors: optical heart rate, SpO₂ blood oxygen, accelerometer, altimeter, compass, thermometer, and now an electrocardiogram (ECG) sensor (new to the Venu series). The addition of ECG brings Garmin in line with Apple, Samsung, and Fitbit, enabling on-demand heart rhythm recordings to detect atrial fibrillation notebookcheck.net.

Garmin didn’t skimp on smartwatch features either. Like the Venu 3, the new model has a built-in speaker and microphone, allowing for Bluetooth phone calls from the wrist and voice assistant commands when paired with your phone wareable.com nasdaq.com. Users can store music on the watch, make contactless payments via Garmin Pay, and even respond to texts with an on-watch keyboard or voice dictation in conjunction with a smartphone notebookcheck.net. All of this is packed into a form that is water-rated to 5 ATM for swim-proof use. Despite the extra tech, the watch manages to keep a relatively slim profile suitable for 24/7 wear, and Garmin claims it remains lightweight and comfortable for both workouts and sleep tracking sessions.

Health and Wellness Features: Your On-Wrist Coach for Better Living

The Garmin Venu 4’s most significant upgrades revolve around health monitoring and wellness tracking, positioning the device as much more than a step-counter – it’s aiming to be a full-fledged health coach. Garmin has introduced a trio of new health features that echo trends we’ve seen from specialist wellness wearables like Whoop and Oura, as well as recent moves by Apple.

“Health Status” Dashboard: Debuting in beta on the Venu 4, this feature continuously monitors key health metrics overnight – including heart rate, heart rate variability (HRV), respiration rate, skin temperature, and blood oxygen (Pulse Ox) – and analyzes their trends against your personal baseline wareable.com. If your numbers start drifting significantly away from your norm (for example, elevated resting heart rate and suppressed HRV), the watch will alert you that you might be getting sick or overly fatigued wareable.com. It’s a proactive heads-up that something is off with your recovery or wellness. As Wareable notes, this is very similar to Whoop’s Health Monitor or Oura’s Readiness Score components, which try to flag early signs of illness or overtraining wareable.com. By integrating this, Garmin is clearly embracing the holistic health trend of wearables looking beyond daily steps – helping users connect the dots between subtle physiological changes and their overall well-being.
Lifestyle Logging: The Venu 4 lets users manually log lifestyle factors – specifically caffeine and alcohol intake at launch – right on the watch (or in Garmin Connect app) wareable.com. The idea is to track how these daily habits impact your body. Over time, Garmin will show reports correlating, say, that extra evening espresso with poorer sleep or higher next-day stress levels wareable.com. This concept closely mirrors the Whoop Journal feature, which has been popular among athletes for tracking behaviors and performance wareable.com. By building lifestyle logging into its ecosystem, Garmin empowers users to perform mini health experiments and see trends (e.g., “When I skip my nightcap, my HRV is higher and sleep scores improve”). It’s a step toward personalized coaching, making the Venu 4 not just a passive tracker but an active participant in improving your daily health choices.
Advanced Sleep Insights: Garmin’s sleep tracking gets smarter on the Venu 4 with new metrics for Sleep Alignment and Sleep Consistency wareable.com. Sleep Alignment aims to gauge how well your sleep schedule syncs with your natural circadian rhythm – a hot topic in wellness tech, as research shows aligning sleep/wake times to your internal clock can improve health and energy. Sleep Consistency tracks the variability of your bedtimes and wake times over the past week wareable.com. The Venu 4 will effectively highlight if you’re keeping a regular schedule or not. These additions follow a broader industry push toward circadian health tracking wareable.com. In fact, around the same time, Apple announced a new Sleep Schedule/Score feature for watchOS, and numerous brands have been emphasizing sleep regularity in their health scores wareable.com. Garmin is now joining that ranks, encouraging users to not just get enough sleep, but to do so on a consistent, rhythm-aligned schedule for optimal recovery.
ECG & Heart Health: For the first time in a Venu device, Garmin has included an ECG app on the Venu 4 notebookcheck.net. Users can place their fingers on the watch bezel to take a 30-second electrocardiogram reading, which can detect signs of atrial fibrillation (AFib) or confirm a normal sinus rhythm. Garmin received FDA clearance for ECG with its Venu 2 Plus in 2022, and now that capability is built into the Venu 4 hardware. This brings Garmin to parity with the likes of the Apple Watch, Samsung’s Galaxy Watch, and Fitbit Sense in terms of heart health features. While Garmin’s bread and butter has been fitness, the Venu 4 shows the company is also serious about medical-grade health monitoring. Alongside ECG, the watch continues to track all-day heart rate, stress (via HRV-based metrics), respiration, and blood oxygen saturation, alerting you to unusual values (e.g., abnormally high heart rate alerts).
Accessibility and Other Wellness Tools: An interesting angle Garmin took with the Venu 4 is improving accessibility features. The watch can now provide spoken audio for key information – for instance, it can read aloud the time and your health stats on demand, essentially a “spoken watch face” for visually impaired users dcrainmaker.com nasdaq.com. It also offers customizable color filters on the display to assist those with color vision deficiencies nasdaq.com. These additions, while not directly related to fitness, underscore Garmin’s effort to make its health data more broadly usable. Additionally, the Venu 4 keeps features like Body Battery (Garmin’s energy gauge derived from HRV and stress) and women’s health tracking (menstrual cycle and pregnancy tracking) nasdaq.com. When paired with Garmin’s Connect app, users get a comprehensive health dashboard – now enhanced with the Venu 4’s new metrics – to view trends over time.

In sum, the Venu 4 is pushing into territory that blurs the line between a smartwatch and a dedicated wellness monitor. By combining sleep, stress, recovery, and lifestyle factors, it aims to provide a 360-degree view of your health and serve up actionable insights. Garmin is effectively following the broader tech trend of wearables as wellness coaches, not just activity trackers, a move likely to appeal to users who want deeper health context without paying for separate services or subscriptions.

Fitness and Training: A Huge Leap for Sports Features

While the Venu line has always been more lifestyle-oriented than Garmin’s hardcore fitness watches, the Venu 4 drastically narrows that gap. In fact, tech expert Ray Maker (DC Rainmaker) quipped that at its core the Venu 4 is basically “a Forerunner 570 with a different case, a flashlight, and ECG” – meaning it inherited a ton of advanced fitness capabilities from Garmin’s runner-focused devices dcrainmaker.com. Here are the key training and exercise upgrades in the Venu 4:

Garmin Fitness Coach & Daily Workouts: Perhaps the centerpiece for active users is the new Garmin Fitness Coach feature. This offers personalized, adaptive workout suggestions for over 25 different activities tomsguide.com nasdaq.com. In the past, Garmin watches (even high-end ones) limited daily suggested workouts mostly to running, cycling, and a bit of cardio. Now, the Venu 4 can recommend sessions for strength training, HIIT, yoga, pilates, swimming, hiking, and more, adjusting each day based on your recovery and previous workouts. For example, if you did a hard run yesterday, it might suggest a lighter yoga or core workout today. This broad approach suits the Venu 4’s target “people who do a range of exercises” rather than specialists tomsguide.com. It essentially gives you an on-wrist personal trainer across multiple disciplines – a clear differentiator from Apple and Samsung watches, which do offer workout tracking but not this kind of multi-sport training guidance built-in.
Expanded Sports Profiles: Garmin added a variety of new sport modes and features to track specialized workouts. A notable one is the “Mixed Session” profile, which lets you string together multiple activities in one go (useful for triathletes doing combo workouts like bike-to-run bricks) wareable.com. There’s also Auto Track Detection for runners – the watch can detect when you’re on a standard 400m track and record splits accurately (great for interval training). Other performance-oriented additions include Lactate Threshold testing, Running Power metrics, Heat & Altitude Acclimation data, a Race Widget (countdown and prep info for upcoming races), and more – features that were previously seen only in Garmin’s Forerunner and Fenix series (some early users noted these in Garmin’s beta forums) gadgetsandwearables.com ground.news. The Venu 4 even supports triathlon mode and structured multisport workouts, plus Garmin Triathlon Coach plans for those training for an event dcrainmaker.com. In short, Venu 4 owners will have a training toolbox that was unimaginable on the Venu 3.
Training Load & Readiness: One of the biggest gains for serious fitness folks is the inclusion of Garmin’s full Training Load and Recovery suite. The Venu 4 now calculates metrics like Acute Training Load, load focus, recovery time, and it even offers Training Readiness scores each morning dcrainmaker.com dcrainmaker.com. Training Readiness (which factors in your sleep, recovery, HRV status, stress, etc.) was something Garmin debuted in higher-end watches to tell you how prepared your body is for a hard workout on a given day. Bringing this to the Venu series makes the Venu 4 a much more serious training companion – it helps prevent overtraining by suggesting when to push versus when to rest. Additionally, Suggested Finish Time estimates have been added (the watch can predict your potential race time mid-activity), and a Race Calendar integration keeps you mindful of upcoming goals dcrainmaker.com. Essentially, the Venu 4 now does much of what a Forerunner 900-series watch can do in terms of training analytics.
Sensor Support and Accuracy: Garmin has also opened up expanded sensor support on the Venu 4. It can pair with external sensors like heart rate straps, cycling speed/cadence sensors, cycling power meters, Garmin’s Varia radar for bikes, and even indoor smart trainers or bike electronic shifting systems dcrainmaker.com. This was an area where Venu 3 was somewhat limited. The inclusion of dual-frequency multi-band GPS means the Venu 4 can achieve very high location accuracy (especially in city downtowns or trail canyons) on par with top-tier sports watches dcrainmaker.com. Of course, more GNSS accuracy comes at a battery cost – which Garmin quantified as about 17–19 hours in all-systems/multi-band mode, versus 20 hours in standard GPS mode tomsguide.com. For most users, that’s more than enough for any marathon, ultra or full day of hiking. And speaking of accuracy, the optical heart rate sensor has likely seen incremental improvements and benefits from the new algorithms Garmin fine-tuned across devices in 2025 (recent firmware updates focused on HR tracking improvements notebookcheck.net).
User Interface and OS: Under the hood, the Venu 4 is significant for being on Garmin’s new unified “Garmin OS” platform that many of its 2025 watches share dcrainmaker.com. This modernization means a smoother interface and quicker feature updates across models. Garmin also added a “Large Font” option in the UI to improve readability for those who prefer bigger text dcrainmaker.com. Combined with the spoken audio and color modes mentioned earlier, it shows Garmin’s trying to make the watch more user-friendly. Navigation on the watch mixes touch and button use – with one fewer button now, more tasks like scrolling menus will be touch-centric, but Garmin’s UI is generally intuitive for those used to smartphones. Customization remains high: the watch supports thousands of watch faces, apps, and data fields via Connect IQ (and the Venu 4 can now run up to 4 data fields per screen in activities, up from 2 on Venu 3 dcrainmaker.com). This will please data-hungry athletes who want more metrics visible at a glance.

In summary, the Venu 4 represents a huge leap in fitness functionality for Garmin’s mid-tier smartwatch. What was once considered a “casual” fitness watch can now genuinely be used for structured training in running, triathlon, and more, without missing much from the more expensive Forerunner models. It’s a clear signal that Garmin is looking to court users who want the best of both worlds – comprehensive fitness features and a fashionable, full-color touchscreen watch. As Forbes noted, Garmin has effectively “leveled up” the Venu series by bringing advanced fitness metrics and coaching tools that the Venu 3 lacked forbes.com. The trade-off, however, is a bump in price and a slight sacrifice in battery life for the larger model (owing to the higher-end hardware). We’ll discuss those shortly, but first, how does this new Venu stack up against the previous generation and the competition?

Battery Life: Still Long-Lasting, Though Slightly Reduced

Battery longevity has long been a selling point for Garmin watches, and the Venu 4 continues that tradition – albeit with a minor step back from its predecessor in one case. Garmin advertises up to 12 days of battery life in smartwatch mode for the Venu 4 (45mm) and 10 days for the 41mm version wareable.com. This assumes a typical usage profile without the screen in always-on mode. These figures are actually a couple of days shorter than the Venu 3’s battery specs (the Venu 3 boasted ~14 days on the larger model) wareable.com. Garmin watchers found it curious that the 45mm Venu 4’s battery estimate is lower than before, even though the 41mm model’s battery life remained the same 10 days wareable.com. It’s speculated that the new features – such as the brighter screen, more powerful processor for Garmin’s updated OS, or constant background health monitoring – draw a bit more power. However, in real terms, 12 days is still excellent endurance and far outlasts most rivals (Apple and Samsung watches typically need daily or every-other-day charging).

In practical use, if you enable the always-on display, expect about 4 days on a charge for the 45mm Venu 4 tomsguide.com. Workouts impact battery too: continuous GPS runtime is about 20 hours with the standard mode, which drops to roughly 17–19 hours when using the most precise multi-band GPS setting tomsguide.com. Even at the lower end, that’s enough for an ultra-distance effort for serious athletes, or multiple shorter workouts before needing to recharge. The Venu 4 also has battery saver modes and customizable power settings if you need to extend life further (for instance, by turning off Pulse Ox tracking, which on any watch consumes extra battery).

The decision to include a power-hungry flashlight and multi-band GPS was clearly weighed against battery impact. Garmin appears to have balanced things well: you still get multi-day usage. For perspective, PhoneArena highlights that 12-day battery life means you don’t have to charge nightly, making it feasible to wear the watch to bed for sleep tracking every night without worry phonearena.com phonearena.com. This untethered experience is a stark contrast to an Apple Watch, which virtually mandates a daily charge (often in the evening, thereby complicating overnight tracking). Many users will find the convenience of a once-every-week-and-a-half charge far outweighs the slight downgrade from the previous gen’s spec. And Garmin’s charging times are usually quick (around an hour for a full top-up with their proprietary cable), so even a brief charge can add days of use.

All told, the Venu 4 maintains Garmin’s reputation for outstanding battery endurance. Yes, the spec sheet shows a small step backward for the larger model, but in exchange, users gain a brighter screen and richer features. The smaller 41mm model sees no loss in longevity. With up to 12 days of coverage, the Venu 4 solidifies its appeal to those frustrated by the “charge every night” routine of other smartwatches. This substantial battery life is a key competitive advantage Garmin is banking on in luring customers from Apple and Android-based watches.

Pricing, Availability and Regional Rollout

The Garmin Venu 4 comes at a higher price point than any previous Venu watch, reflecting its expanded capabilities. In the United States, the Venu 4 (45mm or 41mm) starts at $549.99 for versions that include a standard silicone band tomsguide.com. In the UK it’s priced at £469.99, and in the Eurozone €549.99 for the base models notebookcheck.net. These are the MSRPs for the core configurations available in several color options (black, silver, gold-toned, etc.). Garmin also offers premium SKUs that either come with a leather strap or an extra leather band included – those versions cost $599.99 (or £519.99/€599.99) notebookcheck.net. Essentially, opting for leather adds about $50/£50/€50 to the price, consistent with what Tom’s Guide noted (the leather band package is $50 more expensive) tomsguide.com.

It’s worth pointing out an unusual quirk in pricing: the larger 45mm model is actually cheaper than the 41mm in some configurations phonearena.com. As reported by PhoneArena, the 45mm Venu 4 with silicone band is $549.99, while the 41mm with a silicone band was listed at $599.99 phonearena.com. This likely is because the specific 41mm SKUs at launch included the more expensive leather band bundle by default in certain regions, whereas one of the 45mm SKUs did not. However, based on Garmin’s official info, both sizes with comparable straps are the same base price; consumers can essentially choose the size that fits them without a price penalty notebookcheck.net. The key takeaway: $549.99 / £469.99 is the entry price for a Venu 4, and the fanciest variant goes for $599.99. This pricing represents a $100 increase over the Venu 3, which launched at $449.99 in 2023 tomsguide.com notebookcheck.net. Garmin is clearly confident that the beefed-up feature set justifies a higher cost.

In terms of availability, Garmin announced that the Venu 4 series would be available starting September 22, 2025 wareable.com nasdaq.com. On that date, it’s expected to hit Garmin’s own website, major online retailers, and brick-and-mortar outlets in multiple regions. The launch is global – North America, Europe, and likely Asia Pacific all around the same timeframe – given that pricing in dollars, pounds, and euros was provided upfront notebookcheck.net. Customers in the US and Europe can preorder or purchase from the 22nd onward. By positioning it right before the holiday quarter, Garmin is no doubt aiming to capture early gift shoppers and capitalize on New Year fitness resolutions that often drive wearable sales.

Regionally, the features of the Venu 4 remain consistent, though one caveat is ECG functionality: Garmin’s ECG app requires regulatory clearance in each region. It’s FDA-cleared in the US, and Garmin likely secured CE marking for Europe, but in some countries ECG might be disabled until approvals are in place. Early adopters should check Garmin’s documentation on which regions support the ECG app at launch.

Aside from that, all other features (sleep tracking, coach, flashlight, etc.) are available to everyone out of the box. The watch supports multiple languages and units (imperial/metric), as usual. Garmin’s press release emphasized the launch is part of its premium smartwatch lineup, indicating you’ll find the Venu 4 alongside higher-end models at top retailers nasdaq.com. The company also mentioned that Garmin Ltd. stock saw a slight uptick upon the announcement – perhaps a reflection of investor confidence in these new products nasdaq.com.

For buyers comparing, the price lands the Venu 4 in an interesting spot: at ~$550, it’s more expensive than the flagship Apple Watch Series 9 ($399+) and even the new Apple Watch Series 11’s base model, and it’s double the price of a Fitbit Sense 2. It’s closer to the starting price of an Apple Watch Ultra or Samsung Galaxy Watch 6 Classic LTE. We’ll delve into those comparisons next, but clearly Garmin is betting that consumers will pay a premium for the Venu 4’s multi-week battery and deep health/fitness features.

How Does Venu 4 Compare? (Venu 4 vs Venu 3, Apple Watch, Samsung, Fitbit)

Garmin’s Venu 4 enters a crowded smartwatch arena. Let’s break down how it stacks up against its predecessor (Venu 3) and some of its main competitors in the market:

Venu 4 vs. Venu 3 (Previous Generation)

The Venu 4 is a direct successor to 2023’s Venu 3, and it represents a substantial upgrade in many respects. According to Wareable, at first glance the refresh is “substantial and welcome, solidifying the Venu’s position as Garmin’s mid-tier, good-for-all smartwatch” wareable.com. Here are the key differences:

Hardware Improvements: Venu 4’s new LED flashlight, full metal casing, and addition of ECG are the most obvious hardware changes (none of which the Venu 3 had). The flashlight and ECG in particular are major differentiators that make the Venu 4 feel more “premium” and versatile dcrainmaker.com. The Venu 3 did not include an ECG sensor and of course had no flashlight. The Venu 4 also has multi-band GPS which improves accuracy compared to Venu 3’s single-band GNSS – a boon for outdoor athletes. On the flip side, the Venu 4 drops from three buttons to two, which may require Venu 3 users to adjust their muscle memory for controls tomsguide.com. Both models have AMOLED displays, but the Venu 4’s is reportedly brighter (matching the luminance of the newest Forerunner 570/970 screens) dcrainmaker.com.
Battery and Build: The Venu 3 boasted slightly longer battery on the large model (14 days vs 12 days) wareable.com, likely due to the Venu 4’s more power-hungry features. The smaller models remain at 10 days each. It’s a minor regression for battery longevity in exchange for new tech. Physically, dimensions are similar, though the Venu 4’s case is more refined metal whereas Venu 3 was polymer with metal bezel dcrainmaker.com. Both are comfortable for daily wear, but the Venu 4’s aesthetic is closer to a fashion watch, whereas Venu 3 looked a bit more plasticky sport. Importantly, price jumped from ~$449 to $549 – a $100 increase (about £70 in the UK) tomsguide.com. Garmin justifies this by positioning the Venu 4 as essentially equal to a Forerunner 570 (which costs the same) but in a touch-first form factor dcrainmaker.com. In short, the Venu 4 is more expensive but also far more capable than the Venu 3 was.
Software Features: This is where the generational leap is most pronounced. The Venu 3 was praised for introducing things like HRV Status and all-day stress tracking, and it even added a basic sleep coach feature and nap tracking. However, the Venu 4 blows past it with new additions: Health Status alerts, Lifestyle logging, Sleep alignment tools, and the whole gamut of training metrics (Training Readiness, Load, etc.) that Venu 3 lacked dcrainmaker.com dcrainmaker.com. Venu 3 did not have Garmin’s training load or recovery advisories – those were reserved for higher models. Now Venu 4 includes them, meaning someone upgrading from Venu 3 will see a lot of new menus and insights. Also, Venu 4’s Fitness Coach with 25+ activities goes well beyond Venu 3’s suggestions (which were limited mainly to running, cycling and some yoga). In essence, Garmin is giving Venu 4 users much of the software that was missing in Venu 3 and often lamented. Forbes even titled their coverage, “Venu 4 adds features the Venu 3 should have had in the first place,” highlighting that Garmin is catching up on some obvious omissions forbes.com.
Overall: The Venu 3 was a strong smartwatch in 2023, but it felt a bit like a minor evolution of Venu 2. The Venu 4, by contrast, feels like a generational leap. Ray Maker (DCRainmaker) called it “a massive upgrade over the existing Venu 3, whether you wanted it or not” dcrainmaker.com. Existing Garmin users who held off on the Venu 3 due to its missing metrics will find Venu 4 much more compelling. The only reasons one might stick to (or pick up) a Venu 3 now would be cost savings – since it’s likely discounted – or if one absolutely needs the extra couple days of battery and an extra button. Otherwise, the Venu 4 is superior in virtually every way, bringing the Venu line up to parity with Garmin’s more expensive watches on a feature basis.

Venu 4 vs. Apple Watch (Series 9 and Series 11)

Garmin explicitly has the Apple Watch in its sights. The Venu 4 is designed to rival Apple’s latest Series 9/Series 11 Watch by excelling in areas Apple lags. The contrast is sharp:

Battery Life: Perhaps the biggest trump card – the Venu 4’s 12-day battery life dwarfs the Apple Watch’s. The Apple Watch Series 9 (2023) and even the rumored Series 11 (2025) get about 1–2 days per charge at best, depending on use. Apple has made minor gains with power saving modes, but nothing close to Garmin’s endurance. This means Venu 4 users can track sleep and stress 24/7 without worrying about daily charging phonearena.com, which is a pain point for Apple Watch users who often need to charge daily (typically sacrificing either night or daytime wear). For anyone prioritizing round-the-clock health monitoring and travel convenience, Garmin wins hands-down in battery.
Health and Fitness Features: Apple pioneered many wellness features in wearables (ECG in 2018, fall detection, etc.), and the Apple Watch has an extensive app ecosystem for health. However, in 2025 Apple is just starting to introduce things like a Sleep Score and more advanced coaching (e.g., Apple’s Fitness+ and health apps). Garmin Venu 4 comes out-of-the-box with a more in-depth fitness and recovery platform. It offers training metrics (like HRV status, training readiness) that Apple’s native apps simply don’t provide (although third-party apps on Apple Watch can approximate some). The Venu 4 also has the new Health Status and Lifestyle logs, which Apple doesn’t directly match – Apple Health app tracks nutrition and mindfulness but doesn’t correlate habits with body metrics as explicitly. Both have ECG and irregular heart rhythm alerts; Apple additionally has blood oxygen and now temperature sensors (since Series 8) for cycle tracking – Garmin monitors skin temperature too for trends notebookcheck.net, but doesn’t use it for cycle predictions. One could argue Apple’s medical validation and integrations (like sharing ECGs with doctors) are stronger, but Garmin isn’t far behind. Fall detection and safety: Apple Watch has fall detection and emergency SOS; Garmin Venu 4 similarly offers incident detection during workouts and can send alerts through a connected phone. Apple does have the new SOS via satellite on some models (Ultra/Series 14 phone synergy), which Garmin doesn’t offer on Venu.
Sport and Coaching: For serious training, Garmin still has an edge. Runners, triathletes, or gym-goers get a more structured coaching experience on the Venu 4 (daily adaptive workouts, training load focus, etc.) tomsguide.com dcrainmaker.com. Apple’s Workout app is excellent for general use and has things like heart rate zones and custom interval workouts now, but it doesn’t give you training status or periodization feedback. Also, Garmin’s native support for things like triathlons, trail ultrarunning features, and sensor accessories (like chest HR straps, cycling sensors) is far beyond Apple’s. In short, fitness enthusiasts will find the Venu 4 a more complete solution without needing additional subscriptions (Apple might push you towards Fitness+ or third-party apps for training plans). That said, the Apple Watch excels in its simplicity and smart features – notifications, responding to messages, a rich third-party app ecosystem (for everything from home automation to music to maps). Garmin has improved with things like notifications and limited replies, but it’s not a full smartphone replacement on the wrist like Apple Watch can be for iPhone users.
Display and Design: Apple Watches have a square Retina OLED display vs Venu’s round AMOLED. Aesthetic preference plays a role – some prefer a traditional round watch look (Garmin), others like Apple’s iconic square. Apple’s screen is arguably more vibrant and fluid (120Hz on newer models) and supports more interactive apps. Garmin’s screen is bright and colorful too, and now with spoken prompts and an improved OS it’s catching up, but Garmin doesn’t run full apps like Apple (e.g., you won’t be hailing Ubers or watching videos on a Venu 4). Apple also offers more case material choices (aluminum, stainless, titanium) whereas Garmin Venu 4 has one build (metal+polymer) in different colors.
Price: An Apple Watch Series 9 starts around $399, significantly less than Venu 4’s $549. However, that’s for the smaller aluminum GPS-only model. A closer comp might be an Apple Watch Series 9 Cellular 45mm which can be $529+, or the new Series 11 which likely has a similar structure. Still, Tom’s Guide notes the Venu 4 is “substantially more expensive than the Apple Watch 11” at launch tomsguide.com. So Garmin is asking buyers to pay a premium, presumably for those hardware and battery advantages. Apple does have the Ultra line at $799+ which is more expensive than Venu 4, but Ultra also has high-end materials and even more rugged features (though ironically still shorter battery than Garmin).

In summary, Garmin Venu 4 vs Apple Watch comes down to priorities. If you want a device that you can wear for days on end, intensely track fitness and recovery, and not be tied to a specific phone ecosystem, the Venu 4 is extremely attractive. It’s platform-agnostic (works with Android or iPhone) and gives you heaps of data with no monthly fees. If you value advanced smart features, polished app experiences, and tight integration with your iPhone, the Apple Watch still wins in those areas. Garmin clearly designed the Venu 4 to lure fitness-focused users away from Apple by outdoing it in battery and wellness tracking. As Wareable put it, the Venu 4 is “designed to compete directly with the likes of Apple [Watch] Series 11” in the mid-tier smartwatch category wareable.com, and it largely succeeds on specs – but it will cater to a somewhat different audience than Apple’s all-purpose approach.

Venu 4 vs. Samsung Galaxy Watch 6 (and 7/8)

Samsung’s Galaxy Watch series is often the go-to smartwatch for Android users. The Galaxy Watch 6 (2023 model) and its successors are strong general-purpose smartwatches, but the Venu 4 differs in focus:

Battery: The Galaxy Watch 6 typically gets around 2 days of battery (maybe 3 on the larger model with conservative use). This is far short of Venu 4’s 10–12 days. Even Samsung’s newer models (Galaxy Watch 7 or 8, if following yearly updates) are unlikely to exceed a few days since they run Wear OS with power-hungry features. Thus, Garmin has a clear battery life advantage again – a key selling point for those tired of frequent charging.
OS and Apps: Galaxy Watches run Wear OS (with Samsung’s One UI skin), giving them access to a wide array of apps via the Play Store (Google Maps, Spotify offline, Google Wallet, etc.). Garmin’s platform, by contrast, has a smaller app ecosystem (Connect IQ apps are mostly fitness-centric or simple utilities). If having apps on your watch (like transit directions, ride-sharing, etc.) matters, the Galaxy Watch is better. However, many Garmin users find that core functionalities (notifications, music, payments) cover their needs, and they prefer the simpler, fitness-focused interface Garmin provides. It’s a classic trade-off: Samsung’s watch is more of an extension of your smartphone, whereas Garmin’s is more of an extension of your fitness gear.
Health/fitness features: Samsung has stepped up health features in recent models – the Galaxy Watch 6 offers ECG, blood pressure (in some regions, via calibration with a cuff), body composition analysis (BIA sensor for body fat%), and has sleep tracking with a basic sleep coaching (they give you a sleep “animal” chronotype). It also introduced features like irregular heart rhythm notifications similar to Apple’s. Fitness-wise, Samsung covers most common activities and connects to Google Fit or Samsung Health for tracking. However, Samsung’s training analytics are nowhere near Garmin’s. There’s no training load or readiness score equivalent built-in (though third-party apps could be used). The Galaxy Watch will count steps, active minutes, and give you cardio insights (VO₂ max estimates, etc.), but Garmin’s platform is more advanced for athletes (detailed running dynamics, recovery times, etc.). Garmin also tends to have more accurate GPS and HR tracking during workouts than many Wear OS watches, thanks to its heritage in sport devices. The Venu 4’s new multi-band GPS and improved HR sensor aim to maintain that reputation for accuracy.
Ruggedness and Use Case: Samsung watches are elegant and meant as daily smartwatches; they are 5ATM water resistant and can track swims, but they’re not really built for extreme environments. Garmin’s watches, including Venu 4, have slightly more utilitarian designs (even though Venu is on the stylish side for Garmin). The Venu 4 doesn’t reach Fenix-level durability, but Garmin watches are generally seen as a bit more robust for things like long hikes, trail runs, etc. Additionally, Garmin’s navigation features (like following a breadcrumb trail or back-to-start) are often better implemented than on Wear OS watches. That said, the Galaxy Watch 6 has full-color maps via apps and smartphone tethering—if one really wants maps on wrist, ironically the Venu 4 might not have detailed maps (Garmin usually reserves full maps for their Fenix/Epix or higher-end Forerunners). So in pure navigation, Samsung could use Google Maps turn-by-turn, whereas Venu 4 might just show an arrow route if you load a course (Garmin hasn’t advertised maps for Venu 4, so likely it’s basic breadcrumb navigation).
Price: The Galaxy Watch is significantly cheaper. The GW6 started around $300 for Bluetooth models ($400+ for LTE). Even the classic style or newer GW7/8 would likely be under $500. The Venu 4 at $549 is pricier than any standard Samsung watch. This could be a barrier for some – you’re paying more for Garmin’s brand and fitness prowess. However, there’s also the factor of no recurring fees on Garmin. Samsung doesn’t really hide features behind paywalls either (aside from maybe third-party app subscriptions), so both are fairly equal there.

In essence, Garmin Venu 4 vs Galaxy Watch comes down to whether you prioritize a long-lasting fitness tool (Venu 4) or a feature-rich smart companion (Galaxy Watch). Garmin hopes to convert Android users who might currently wear a Galaxy Watch by offering them vastly better battery and deeper health insights, at the cost of some smart conveniences. Wareable mentioned that the Venu 4 is intended to compete with the Galaxy Watch 8 (the presumed 2025 model) directly in that mid-tier category wareable.com. Given Samsung’s popularity, it will be interesting to see if Garmin can pull some users away – likely those who are getting more serious about fitness tracking or are frustrated with short battery life on Wear OS.

Venu 4 vs. Fitbit Sense 2

Fitbit’s Sense 2 (launched late 2022) is another wearable that targets health-conscious users, and at first glance it shares some philosophy with Garmin:

Health features: The Fitbit Sense 2 touts extensive health monitoring – it has ECG for AFib, an EDA sensor for stress (electrodermal activity to detect stress responses), skin temperature sensor, and it provides a Daily Readiness Score (for Premium subscribers) that is conceptually similar to Garmin’s Training Readiness. It also emphasizes sleep tracking and stress management, with features like all-day Body Response notifications (tied to stress EDA, heart, etc.). Garmin Venu 4 covers many of the same bases: it has ECG, tracks stress via HRV (though no galvanic skin response sensor), tracks skin temp trends, and gives recovery/readiness feedback. One could argue Fitbit’s stress tracking is more direct (actual skin sweat response), whereas Garmin infers stress from heart metrics. Fitbit’s sleep tracking is very robust and user-friendly; Garmin’s sleep tracking has improved greatly and now with circadian alignment and consistency metrics it’s on par or even more advanced in some ways. Notably, Garmin does not charge a subscription for its full feature set, whereas Fitbit locks some insights (like detailed sleep analysis and readiness score) behind the Fitbit Premium monthly subscription after the free trial. This is a key point for consumers comparing – the Venu 4’s higher upfront cost might be offset over time by not having to pay $10/month for Premium to get similar insights.
Fitness and GPS: Fitbit devices, including Sense 2, are not as performance-focused as Garmin. The Sense 2 can track workouts (runs, bike rides, etc.) and has built-in GPS, but it’s relatively basic in data and training feedback. There’s no concept of training load, VO₂ max (Fitbit gives a Cardio Fitness score, which is basically VO₂max estimation), or guided workouts on the watch itself (Fitbit offers workouts via the app/phone with Premium). Garmin Venu 4 clearly outshines Fitbit for anyone who is into structured training or diverse sports – Garmin supports far more activity types and metrics. If your main use of a smartwatch is casual exercise and step counting, Fitbit is fine and simpler. But if you want to progress in your fitness or have specific goals, Garmin provides the tools.
Smartwatch vs Platform: Fitbit Sense 2 was actually criticized for reducing its smart capabilities (it removed third-party app support and Google Assistant compared to the original Sense). It does have phone notifications, calls (if phone nearby), and supports contactless payments (Fitbit Pay or now Google Wallet on it). But overall, the Sense 2 is a bit limited as a “smartwatch” – it’s more of a pure tracker with a nice screen. Garmin Venu 4, on the other hand, added more smart features (phone calls, voice assistant support via phone, etc.) and can run some apps/widgets. It still isn’t as app-rich as Apple or Wear OS, but it arguably outdoes the Fitbit now in smart capabilities (especially since Google’s acquisition of Fitbit led to scaling back the Fitbit OS functionality). Another consideration: platform/ecosystem – if a user is already in Fitbit’s ecosystem with friends, challenges, historical data, they might lean Sense 2. Garmin has its own ecosystem and community features (Garmin Connect challenges, badges, etc.), but it’s a switch to make.
Battery: Fitbit Sense 2 gets around 5-6 days of battery on a charge, which was a strong point vs Apple. But Garmin Venu 4 still doubles that. So Garmin wins on battery (12 vs ~6 days). Both can do always-on display at a hit to longevity (Sense 2 drops to 2-3 days with AOD). So battery-wise, Garmin is superior, though Fitbit is no slouch and is far better than Apple/Samsung in that department.
Price: The Sense 2 launched at $299 (and often is on sale well below that now). It is half the price of the Garmin Venu 4. That’s a huge gap. Even factoring in a Fitbit Premium subscription (if one chooses to keep it after the trial), it would take over two years to make up the difference. Garmin is charging a premium; Fitbit is aiming for the mass market at a lower cost. So, if budget is a big concern and extremely advanced fitness metrics aren’t necessary, the Sense 2 could be seen as better value. However, many users felt the Sense 2 under-delivered on being a “smart” device (no music storage, no third-party apps, etc.), whereas Garmin Venu 4 does have music storage, etc.

In summary, Garmin Venu 4 vs Fitbit Sense 2 pits Garmin’s no-compromise approach (at high price, high functionality) against Fitbit’s simplified, more affordable approach. For a user who mainly wants to improve general wellness, manage stress, and have a device that “just works” with minimal fiddling, the Sense 2 is a reasonable choice (especially now that Google is integrating Fitbit into Pixel Watch as well). But the Venu 4 will appeal to those who want deeper data and a device that can grow with their fitness journey. It’s telling that Garmin essentially matched or exceeded Fitbit on most health features (even stress logging, with Lifestyle logs on Garmin to correlate stress causes), while adding all the athletic training features that Fitbit completely lacks. Additionally, Garmin’s no-subscription model is attractive as ongoing cost is zero.

Venu 4 vs. Others (Briefly)

Other competitors include the Google Pixel Watch (and Pixel Watch 2), which integrate Fitbit smarts into a Wear OS watch. The Pixel Watch 2 (2024) for instance has Fitbit’s health features and a sleek design, but again battery is ~24-48h and it requires charging often. Garmin likely outlasts it and offers more training metrics, but Pixel Watch offers full app support and Google services on the wrist. There’s also the broader landscape of fitness watches from the likes of Coros, Polar, Amazfit, etc. In the premium segment, few combine AMOLED touchscreen and robust fitness like Garmin Venu 4 does, except perhaps Amazfit or Huawei’s watches (which can have great battery but lack Garmin’s polish in metrics accuracy/community).

Ultimately, Garmin has carved a niche where the Venu 4 is arguably the most well-rounded fitness-centric smartwatch outside of the Apple/Android flagship duopoly. It doesn’t have to beat Apple or Samsung in every way; it just needs to attract the sizable group of users who are disappointed by those devices’ battery life or limited fitness analytics. And on that front, the Venu 4 makes a strong case.

Expert Commentary and Early Impressions

The Garmin Venu 4’s announcement has generated plenty of buzz in the tech community, with experts generally praising the comprehensive upgrades – albeit while noting the higher price. Here are some early comments and quotes from reputable sources:

Ray Maker (DC Rainmaker): A respected authority on sports tech, Maker initially thought the Venu 4 might be underwhelming based on its marketing material, but his hands-on analysis revealed the opposite. “In reality, this watch is actually just a Forerunner 570 with a different case, a flashlight, and ECG… a massive upgrade over the existing Venu 3”, he wrote, emphasizing that it packs “a ton of new sport features” and even expanded sensor support dcrainmaker.com. He humorously mourned the loss of one button (“RIP button,” Maker quipped dcrainmaker.com) but acknowledged the Venu 4 brings the Venu line to parity with Garmin’s advanced offerings. His bottom line was that the Venu 4 delivers far more than its predecessor and that existing Garmin users will appreciate the unified platform and added features.
Conor Allison (Wareable): Wareable’s editor highlighted that “at least at first glance, the Venu 4 refresh is a substantial and welcome update” and that it “solidifies the Venu’s position as Garmin’s mid-tier, good-for-all smartwatch, designed to compete directly with the likes of Apple [Watch] Series 11 and Samsung Galaxy Watch 8.” wareable.com. Wareable’s take praised new software tools like Lifestyle Logging and Health Status, saying they help Garmin “catch up with the best features available elsewhere” and truly assist users in connecting their daily choices with their well-being wareable.com. The addition of the flashlight, while unexpected in the sleek Venu line, was deemed a “killer feature” that adds genuine everyday utility wareable.com. Overall, Wareable sees the Venu 4 as breathing new intelligence into Garmin’s wellness tracking, making it a proactive partner rather than just a passive device.
Nick Harris-Fry (Tom’s Guide): Tom’s Guide noted the price hike in its coverage, bluntly stating “the new features come at a price”, with Venu 4 being “substantially more expensive” than both the Venu 3 and the Apple Watch Series 11 tomsguide.com. However, Tom’s Guide also positioned the watch as ready to rival Apple by “offering longer battery life and more fitness features.” tomsguide.com. In particular, they lauded the expansion of daily suggested workouts beyond running, seeing it as a good fit for people with varied exercise routines tomsguide.com. The site plans to do a full review, but early impressions suggest they view the Venu 4 as a strong contender for the title of best fitness watch in its class, if consumers can stomach the higher cost.
Bloomberg Tech: In a brief analysis of Garmin’s strategy, Bloomberg pointed out that Garmin is expanding its mid-tier smartwatch lineup after a push in premium models bloomberg.com. It described the Venu 4 as a “$550 smartwatch that adds more advanced health features including more personalized sleep tracking and improved pattern recognition for metrics like heart rate and skin temperature” bloomberg.com. This underscores that mainstream financial media see the Venu 4 as Garmin doubling down on health analytics to attract everyday consumers, not just athletes. Bloomberg also noted the context that this comes “weeks after refreshing… premium sports models,” highlighting that Garmin is now bringing high-end features to a broader audience with Venu 4 bloomberg.com.
User Community: On forums like Reddit’s Garmin subreddit, early reactions from users and beta testers were enthusiastic about features like training readiness and new running metrics being available on a Venu device theverge.com. Some joked that the Venu 4 is “what the Venu 3 should have been,” echoing the sentiment that Garmin held back certain features last year that they’ve now delivered (albeit alongside a price increase). A few potential downsides noted by enthusiasts include the reduction to 2 buttons (some athletes prefer more physical controls during sweaty workouts) and the price jump possibly pushing the Venu 4 into a tougher competitive bracket.

In general, expert commentary paints the Venu 4 as a very positive evolution of Garmin’s smartwatch, effectively erasing the gap that existed between the Venu series and Garmin’s top-tier devices in terms of functionality. The criticism, if any, centers on the higher price and the timing (some features feel like catch-up moves). However, as DC Rainmaker pointed out, Garmin’s major internal overhaul (moving to a shared OS platform) means users should see more frequent improvements and stability across all devices dcrainmaker.com. This could make the Venu 4 a great long-term watch as Garmin rolls out updates.

Related Product Announcements: Venu 4S and More from Garmin

The launch of the Garmin Venu 4 didn’t happen in isolation – it was part of a broader release of devices and updates from Garmin, all around the same date. Here are a few related announcements and context:

Garmin Venu 4S (41mm): While Garmin isn’t heavily branding it separately, the 41mm version of the Venu 4 can be considered the successor to the “S” models (like Venu 3S). It has all the same features as the 45mm Venu 4, just in a smaller form factor better suited for smaller wrists. The Venu 4S has a 1.2-inch display vs 1.4-inch on the larger notebookcheck.net, and its battery life is up to 10 days (vs 12). One interesting tidbit from PhoneArena was that the 41mm models were listed at a slightly higher price (possibly due to including leather bands) phonearena.com, but effectively both sizes start at the same base price when comparing like-for-like straps notebookcheck.net. Garmin is offering distinct color options in the small size (e.g., the periwinkle and gold variants are only in 41mm) phonearena.com. So prospective buyers have a choice of size without feature compromise – it’s purely about preference for fit and style. The Venu 4S will launch simultaneously on Sept 22, and likely Garmin expects it to be popular among women and those who found the 45mm too large.
Garmin Instinct Crossover AMOLED: On the very same day, Garmin unveiled the Instinct Crossover AMOLED, a hybrid analog-digital adventure watch with a color AMOLED display and physical hands. Bloomberg’s piece highlights this $649 device as a more rugged offering announced alongside the Venu 4 bloomberg.com. The Instinct Crossover AMOLED essentially takes Garmin’s tough Instinct series and gives it a modern screen and features like the flashlight and multi-band GPS as well. It’s targeted at outdoors enthusiasts who want the analog vibe (the hands move out of the way on command to show data) – quite a different audience than the Venu 4, but it shows Garmin’s breadth: they are catering to both the style-conscious fitness crowd (Venu) and the hardcore adventure crowd (Instinct/Fenix). Both devices even have the flashlight, indicating Garmin sees that as broadly useful.
Garmin Bounce 2: Another device launched was the Garmin Bounce 2, a kids’ smartwatch with LTE connectivity. Wareable and Bloomberg note this $299 watch is aimed at children, with features like two-way calling, location tracking, and even support for things like Amazon Music playback for kids bloomberg.com theverge.com. This shows Garmin expanding into family wearables, not just adult fitness. While not directly related to the Venu 4, it was part of the same fall product wave, signaling Garmin’s intention to have wearables for every demographic – kids, casual fitness folks, serious athletes, etc., all launching around the same time.
Garmin Venu X1: Earlier in June 2025, Garmin launched the Venu X1, an ultra-premium model that actually sits above the Venu 4 in Garmin’s lineup wareable.com. The Venu X1 (starting around $1000) has luxury materials, a larger display, and maybe some exclusive features, but notably it came before the Venu 4. The significance is that Garmin now has a tiered Venu range: the X1 as a luxury flagship, the Venu 4 as the core mainstream, and potentially the older Venu 3 or the Vivoactive series covering lower price points. For consumers, the existence of Venu X1 means Venu 4 owners are not at the absolute top end of Garmin’s fashion smartwatch tech, but arguably the Venu 4 includes more new wellness features (like Health Status) that the X1 might not have gotten at launch. It will be interesting to see if Garmin trickles any of these Venu 4 features to the X1 via updates, or vice versa.
Software Updates: Alongside hardware, Garmin’s recent software updates have been relevant. In the weeks before launch, Garmin issued updates for older watches enabling things like improved heart rate tracking and even an Apple Sleep Score integration for Garmin and Amazfit devices notebookcheck.net. This implies Garmin is keen to keep its whole ecosystem improving. The Venu 4 benefits from these developments out-of-the-box (with its better HR tracking, etc.), but Garmin isn’t leaving existing users behind entirely. This “ecosystem” play is what Garmin often cites: buy a Garmin, and you’re in a platform that’s updated frequently and not tied to any phone brand.

In essence, the Venu 4 launch is part of Garmin’s strategy to refresh and fill every niche in wearables this year. From kids to luxury buyers, from hardcore adventurers to everyday wellness seekers, Garmin released a corresponding product. The Venu 4 (and 4S) serve the broad middle segment – arguably the largest segment – of people who want a stylish smartwatch that doesn’t compromise on serious health and fitness capabilities. It’s Garmin’s answer to the Apple Watch and Fitbit sense for that mainstream audience, while pulling in a lot of Garmin’s sport DNA to set it apart.

Target Audience and Market Positioning

Who is Garmin targeting with the Venu 4? All signs point to a health-conscious, fitness-minded audience that also values style and convenience. The Venu 4 sits in a unique position in Garmin’s lineup and the broader market:

Mid-Tier Upgrade Seekers: Garmin is aiming at those who found the Venu 2 or Venu 3 appealing but perhaps too limited, as well as new customers coming from general smartwatches. It’s for someone who wants more than a basic Fitbit, but maybe doesn’t need the bulk or extreme sport features of a Fenix or Forerunner. Garmin explicitly calls Venu 4 part of its “premium smartwatch lineup” nasdaq.com, indicating it sees these buyers as willing to invest in their health gadgetry. At $550, the target customer likely has a decent budget and might be cross-shopping high-end Apple Watches or luxury fitness watches (e.g., Tag Heuer Connected, etc.). Garmin’s messaging of an “on-wrist coach” nasdaq.com suggests they are targeting people who want guidance and insight, not just raw data.
Fitness Enthusiasts Who Want Style: The Venu 4 is a fitness watch that doesn’t look like one at first glance. With its AMOLED display, metal accents, and relatively slim profile, it’s suitable for the office or a night out – unlike some clunkier sport watches. This is intentional positioning to capture those who might have otherwise bought an Apple Watch for style but really would love Garmin’s fitness tracking. As Wareable noted, the Venu 4 maintains a “clear identity as the obvious pickup for those who want deep insights without sacrificing style” wareable.com. Garmin sees a niche in people who want data-driven training (traditionally Garmin’s domain) in a fashionable package.
Platform-Agnostic Users: Unlike the Apple Watch which requires an iPhone, the Venu 4 works with both Android and iOS. Garmin likely is targeting a share of Android users who want a top-notch smartwatch but aren’t satisfied with what Wear OS devices offer in health tracking. At the same time, even iPhone users who prioritize battery life and fitness might choose Venu 4 over an Apple Watch (giving up some smart features for better battery and analytics). So the audience isn’t limited by phone type – it’s more about mindset. Garmin’s huge existing user base (runners, cyclists, etc.) might buy this as a secondary watch for daily wear, or newcomers might pick it as a first Garmin after hearing from friends about Garmin’s accuracy and battery claims.
Wellness and Data Geeks: With features like HRV tracking, health trend alerts, and lifestyle correlation, Garmin is clearly courting the data-driven wellness crowd. These are people who might have tried a Whoop strap or Oura ring, or at least are aware of the concept of monitoring recovery, readiness, etc. The Venu 4 basically says, “why wear an Apple Watch and a Whoop? Just wear this – it does both.” It’s positioned as a comprehensive all-in-one device: the smartwatch for notifications, the fitness watch for training, and the wellness device for health insights. That trifecta is attractive to someone who wants to optimize their daily performance and health.
Competitor Conquest: Market-wise, Garmin is trying to poach customers from Apple, Samsung, and Fitbit. With Apple dominating the smartwatch market, Garmin’s slice has historically been smaller and focused on athletes. The Venu line has been Garmin’s push into the broader consumer market, and the Venu 4 is its strongest play yet. By matching features like ECG and adding smartphone-like capabilities (calls, voice assistant) that earlier Garmin’s lacked, Garmin is saying the Venu 4 can stand toe-to-toe with an Apple or Samsung as a daily watch. The higher price ironically might also be a tactic – to position it as a premium alternative (sometimes consumers perceive higher price as higher quality). Garmin also likely knows that many of its Fenix/Forerunner users have spouses or friends who don’t need a $800 adventure watch but might like a $500 stylish one – the Venu 4 is perfect for that referral within Garmin’s ecosystem.

Overall, the target audience is someone who wants to take charge of their health and fitness using cutting-edge wearable tech, but who also appreciates a watch that looks good and works in everyday life. The Venu 4 user might be the person who goes from the boardroom to the gym to bed, tracking everything along the way. Garmin’s market positioning is to present the Venu 4 as the ultimate choice for holistic wellness in a smartwatch, capturing users that find pure smartwatches too limited and pure sport watches too cumbersome or unattractive.

Broader Trends in Health & Fitness Tech

The launch of the Garmin Venu 4 underscores several broader trends in the wearable technology space:

Convergence of Smartwatch and Health Tracker: The Venu 4 exemplifies how the lines are blurring between general smartwatches and dedicated health/fitness trackers. It offers smartphone-like capabilities (calls, notifications, voice assistant) while also delivering health insights that once were the domain of niche devices or apps. This reflects a trend where Apple, Google, Samsung, Garmin, and Fitbit are all racing towards devices that can do it all – communication, entertainment, fitness, and medical monitoring. Consumers increasingly expect one wearable to serve multiple purposes. The challenge has been battery life and data accuracy; Garmin’s approach, as seen, is to lean on their strengths in battery and sensors to stand out.
Holistic Health Monitoring: Wearables are moving from counting steps to painting a complete picture of health. The Venu 4’s focus on trends (HRV, temp, etc.) and lifestyle impacts is part of a larger movement towards preventative health monitoring. Devices are trying to alert users to problems before they feel symptoms – whether it’s an impending cold (via HRV drop) or chronic stress. This predictive or proactive health approach is something we see in Oura Ring’s readiness, Whoop’s strain/recovery scores, and now Garmin’s Health Status. It’s also aligned with healthcare trends of using wearables for early detection (e.g., studies on wearables predicting flu or COVID infection via subtle vitals changes). As these features become standard, we might see wearables being recommended by health professionals for maintaining wellness. Garmin’s large user base and credibility in fitness gives it a good platform to push such health features into the mainstream.
Emphasis on Sleep and Circadian Rhythm: In recent years, sleep tracking has gone from a secondary feature to a marquee one. The Venu 4’s new sleep alignment feature is evidence of how much importance brands are placing on sleep quality, timing, and consistency wareable.com. Apple’s latest updates, Fitbit’s detailed sleep stages and Chronotype identification, and even Google’s Nest Hub monitoring sleep – all point to sleep as the new battleground. The circadian rhythm focus is particularly trendy; companies are acknowledging that when you sleep might be as important as how long. Expect future wearables to push advice like “try going to bed at 10pm instead of midnight” to improve alignment – exactly what Venu 4 is attempting. This is tied to broader research and societal interest in chronobiology and optimizing daily routines for health.
Wearable as Coach (AI and Personalization): The Venu 4 branding itself as an “on-wrist coach” fits into the trend of devices not just displaying data but giving personalized guidance. We see it in things like Fitbit’s Daily Readiness or Apple’s personalized Fitness+ recommendations. Garmin’s Fitness Coach adapting each day’s workout based on your condition is a step toward AI-driven coaching. While still rule-based, it hints at how wearables might eventually use machine learning on your data to become very smart coaches or even medical advisors. We’re not fully there yet, but each iteration (like Garmin adding more types of workouts to its suggestions) edges closer to replacing generic training plans with responsive ones. This trend raises interesting questions about the role of human coaches or trainers in the future, but for now, it’s a value-add for users who can’t or don’t want to hire a personal trainer.
Rising Prices and Premiumization: Another trend evidenced by Venu 4 is the rising price of smartwatches. A few years ago, $549 for a Garmin Venu would have seemed unthinkable – that was Fenix territory. Now Garmin feels confident pricing it so high, and Apple’s high-end models (Ultra, stainless steel variants) also hover in that range or higher. This suggests wearables are becoming more accepted as premium devices worth investing in, like smartphones. Part of this is adding luxury materials or exclusive features, but part is just inflation and the cost of more advanced tech (e.g., better displays, more sensors). The risk is pricing out some consumers, but many companies offset that by keeping older models or SE versions around. Garmin will likely continue selling Venu 3 at a lower price for a while, similar to Apple selling older Watch models at lower cost. Nonetheless, the trend is clear: the average price for a fully featured smartwatch is climbing. Garmin is consciously positioning itself as a premium brand in this space, not a budget one.
Accessibility and Inclusivity: Garmin’s addition of accessibility features (spoken prompts, color filters) is part of a commendable trend where tech companies are focusing on making devices usable by people with disabilities or different needs. Apple has been a leader here (with extensive Watch accessibility options), and now Garmin is stepping up. This not only expands the potential user base (e.g., visually impaired fitness enthusiasts can benefit from spoken stats) but also aligns with societal expectations that new tech should “leave no one behind.” It’s likely we’ll see more of this – maybe haptic guides for blind runners, or more adaptive interfaces.
Cross-Platform Ecosystems: Finally, an underlying trend is the ecosystem battles. Apple’s tight integration is its strength, Google is building an ecosystem around Pixel + Fitbit, and Garmin is doing something slightly different – being the neutral ground that works with any phone but then pulling users into its ecosystem of sensors, apps (Garmin Connect), and services. They all want you to stay with their platform. Garmin doesn’t have phones, but it has plenty of other products (bike computers, scales, etc.) and a platform where all your data lives. The introduction of new sensors and data types (like Club sensors, Di2 integration on Venu 4 for cyclists dcrainmaker.com) shows Garmin’s strategy of “if you’re into serious fitness, we support it all – and if you have Garmin gear, it all ties together.” This is the network effect in fitness tech. For consumers, it means picking a watch is increasingly also picking a data ecosystem and possibly a community (e.g., Apple Fitness+ community vs Garmin Connect badges vs Fitbit challenges). Garmin’s trend is to enlarge its ecosystem in both directions – high-end (Venu X1, Fenix) and entry (Bounce kids watch) – to capture customers early and keep them as they progress.

In conclusion, the Garmin Venu 4 embodies many of the current trends driving the wearables industry. It’s a product of a world where people expect their watch to be a coach, a doctor, a phone, and a fashion accessory all at once. Garmin is trying to tick all those boxes with the Venu 4, and largely succeeding. It will be exciting to see how these trends evolve – for instance, how much further can battery tech go to support even more features, or will there be a tipping point in how much data users actually want to see daily. For now, Garmin’s bet is that more data plus intelligent guidance is a winning formula.

Conclusion

The official announcement of the Garmin Venu 4 (and 4S) marks a significant milestone for Garmin’s smartwatch lineup. By combining a stylish new design with a trove of advanced health and fitness features, Garmin has signaled that it’s fully ready to take on the giants of the smartwatch world on multiple fronts. The Venu 4 offers a rare mix of multi-week battery life, deep wellness insights, and broad sport capabilities that few competitors can match in a single device. Early impressions from experts suggest Garmin has largely delivered on making the Venu 4 a true all-in-one smartwatch for the wellness-focused user.

There are of course trade-offs – notably a higher price and a slight step back in battery endurance from the last generation – and Garmin will have to convince consumers that those are worth it for what’s gained. However, given the positive buzz and the clear demand for wearables that don’t require nightly charging or separate devices for different purposes, the Venu 4 is poised to carve out a healthy segment of the market. It’s targeting everyone from busy professionals aiming to stay fit, to competitive athletes wanting a daily wear tracker, to tech enthusiasts who love having the latest health metrics at their fingertips.

As we await in-depth reviews and real-world testing, the Garmin Venu 4’s official debut paints a picture of a device that is equal parts smartwatch and fitness coach. It underscores Garmin’s commitment to innovation in the wearable space and its understanding of what modern users are looking for: a device to help them live healthier, without sacrificing convenience or style. If the Venu 4 lives up to its promises, Garmin will have successfully positioned it as one of the most compelling smartwatch choices of 2025 – a true competitor in the era of health-centric wearable technology.

Sources: The information in this report was drawn from Garmin’s official announcements and hands-on analyses by expert outlets including Wareable wareable.com wareable.com, DC Rainmaker dcrainmaker.com dcrainmaker.com, Tom’s Guide tomsguide.com tomsguide.com, Bloomberg bloomberg.com, Nasdaq/RTT News nasdaq.com nasdaq.com, PhoneArena phonearena.com phonearena.com, NotebookCheck notebookcheck.net notebookcheck.net, and others. These sources provide detailed coverage of the Venu 4’s features, pricing, and competitive context, as cited throughout the text.

🚶Apple Watch vs. Garmin Venu 3: Which tracks my walk better? Let’s compare!⌚️#applewatch #garmin

Watch this video on YouTube.