Boeing Stock Soars on Mega-Orders but Faces Turbulence – Key 2025 Update

Comprehensive Report on Boeing (BA) Stock as of September 26, 2025

• Stock Price & Momentum: Boeing (NYSE: BA) trades around $213.53 per share after the Sept 25 close, down about 9% in the last 30 days but still up over 40% year-on-year ^[1]. Shares saw a seven-session losing streak in mid-September ^[2], before stabilizing near the low-$210s.
• Recent Performance: The stock underperformed the broader market recently – down ~2.5% in the past month vs +0.6% for aerospace peers and +2.4% for the S&P 500 ^[3]. However, it has strongly outpaced the market over the past 12 months (reflecting a rebound from prior lows) ^[4].
• Major Orders Boost Backlog: September brought huge deals – Turkish Airlines agreed to buy up to 225 jets (75 wide-body 787s and 150 737 MAX) ^{[5] [6]}, WestJet ordered 67 Boeing aircraft (the Canadian carrier’s largest order ever) ^[7], and Norwegian Group ordered 30 new 737-8 MAX (its first direct Boeing order since 2017) ^[8]. Boeing’s total backlog swelled to $619 billion (over 5,900 planes) by mid-2025 ^[9].
• Regulatory Hurdles: Boeing faces renewed regulatory scrutiny. The FAA opened a formal probe into 737 MAX production delays in mid-Sept, which sent the stock down ~4% in one day ^[10]. The company is also offering concessions to win EU approval for its planned re-acquisition of supplier Spirit AeroSystems ^[11]. Ongoing certification delays for the 737 MAX 7 and 10 models continue to hang over Boeing ^[12].
• Financial Health: Boeing narrowed its losses in Q2 2025 – revenue jumped 35% and core loss per share improved to –$1.24 (from –$2.90 a year prior) ^{[13] [14]}. Free cash flow was roughly breakeven for the quarter (a $0.2B outflow vs $4.3B outflow in Q2 2024) ^{[15] [16]}. The company still carries a heavy debt load (~$53.3B) against about $23B in cash ^[17], and it has not yet restored its dividend (suspended in 2020).
• Analyst Outlook: Wall Street is cautiously bullish. The consensus rating is “Moderate Buy,” with 26 analysts on average targeting about $230–$234 per share (≈8–10% above current levels) ^[18]. Price targets span from a bullish high of $280 to a bearish low of $140 ^[19], reflecting uncertainty. Notably, Bank of America recently reaffirmed a “Buy” with a $270 target, citing improving deliveries and cash-flow recovery ^[20]. More pessimistic voices (e.g. some Forbes analysts) warn that if Boeing’s turnaround falters, the stock could retreat toward the $120 range in a worst-case scenario ^[21].
• Technical Signals: Boeing’s stock has been trading in a horizontal range with support around $212 ^[22]. It remains below its long-term 200-day moving average (~$226), a key resistance level ^[23]. Short-term momentum indicators have weakened – the 14-day RSI recently dipped below 30, entering oversold territory ^[24], and the MACD trend is negative ^[25]. This could signal a potential technical rebound if buyers emerge, but a break below the $210–$212 support could trigger further downside.

Latest Stock Performance: Turbulence After a Climb

After a solid run earlier in 2025, Boeing’s stock hit some turbulence in September. As of Sept 26, BA shares trade around $213–$214, roughly where they stood one month ago, but they have seesawed in between. Over the past week, the stock has been volatile yet range-bound: it opened the week near $217, dipped mid-week, and settled in the low $210s by Thursday’s close. This choppiness reflects a tug-of-war between positive news (like major aircraft orders) and lingering concerns (regulatory issues and market volatility).

Short-term trend: In mid-September, Boeing slid for 7 consecutive sessions ^[26], falling from the $220s to around $215. This slump coincided with a broader market pullback and company-specific headlines (detailed below). By Sept 19, shares even dipped to $215.65 in pre-market trading ^[27], underscoring fragile near-term sentiment. However, after hitting those lows, the stock found support around the $212 level, which represents the lower bound of its recent trading range ^{[28] [29]}. Buyers have since stepped in at those levels, preventing a deeper slide. In fact, on Sept 26 the stock looked set for a bounce – it was indicated up ~3% pre-market to ~$220 on news of a giant Turkish Airlines order (more on that shortly) ^[30].

Month-over-month: On a one-month view, BA is down about 9% ^[31], having retraced from the mid-$230s in late August to ~$213 now. This decline erased some of the summer gains and slightly underperformed the S&P 500 (which rose ~+2% in the same period) ^[32]. It also lagged the Aerospace & Defense sector, which was roughly flat to modestly higher over the month ^[33]. In other words, Boeing’s September swoon was not purely macro-driven; it was steeper than the market, indicating company-specific pressures at play.

Year-over-year: Despite the recent dip, Boeing has delivered strong gains over the past 12 months – roughly +40% vs September 2024 ^[34]. This far outpaces the broader market and reflects Boeing’s ongoing recovery from the pandemic-era and 737 MAX crisis lows. One year ago, BA was hovering around $150; since then, resurgent aircraft demand and improving financials have lifted the stock significantly. Even after the September pullback, Boeing remains one of the top performers in the Dow Jones Industrial Average on a 1-year basis. (Notably, Boeing’s swings impact the Dow: its weight in the price-weighted index means Boeing’s bad days can drag the Dow down ^[35] – as seen on Sept 15 when Boeing’s drop contributed to a 0.5% intraday dip in the Dow ^[36].)

In summary, Boeing’s stock momentum has stalled in recent weeks, oscillating in the low-$200s amid mixed signals. Bulls appear to be consolidating after a big yearly run-up, while bears point to unresolved challenges. The next directional break – above ~$225 resistance or below ~$210 support – could set the tone heading into Q4.

Financial Health Check: Earnings, Cash Flow & Valuation

Boeing’s financial situation in 2025 shows marked improvement over the deep losses of the past few years, but the company isn’t out of the woods yet. Second-quarter 2025 results, reported in late July, highlighted this “two steps forward, one step back” dynamic:

• Revenues are surging: Q2 2025 revenue came in at $22.7 billion, up 34.8% year-over-year ^{[37] [38]}. A boom in commercial jet deliveries (150 planes in Q2, +63% YoY) fueled this top-line growth ^[39]. Boeing’s Commercial Airplanes division nearly doubled its sales (+81% YoY) on higher 737 MAX and 787 output ^[40], and even the Defense division grew 10% ^[41]. Clearly, airline demand has roared back, and Boeing is racing to ramp up production.
• Losses are narrowing: Boeing still lost money in Q2, but much less than before. The GAAP net loss was ~$612 million (–$0.92 per share) versus a $1.44 billion loss (–$2.33 per share) in Q2 2024 ^[42]. On an adjusted basis, core EPS was –$1.24, beating expectations and a big improvement from –$2.90 a year prior ^{[43] [44]}. Higher volume (and fewer one-time charges) helped shrink the red ink. Boeing even eked out a small operating cash flow of $0.2B in the quarter ^[45].
• Free cash flow near break-even: Perhaps most encouraging, free cash flow (FCF) was roughly flat in Q2: an outflow of just ($0.2 billion) ^{[46] [47]}. That’s a 95% improvement from the massive ($4.3B) cash burn in Q2 2024 ^[48]. For a company that bled cash for years, approaching breakeven FCF is a significant milestone. Boeing is benefitting from higher jet deliveries (bringing in customer payments) and tighter cost controls. Management has guided that FCF will turn positive by Q4 2025 and continue to improve into 2026, barring setbacks ^[49].
• Hefty debt load: Despite better cash generation, Boeing’s balance sheet remains stretched. Total debt stands around $53.3 billion as of mid-2025 ^[50]. The company did trim debt by a few hundred million in Q2, but it’s barely made a dent in the ~$57B peak debt of 2020. Cash and marketable securities are about $23.0 billion ^[51], yielding a net debt of roughly $30B. In other words, debt is more than double Boeing’s cash reserves. This leverage is a legacy of the 737 MAX grounding and COVID collapse, which forced Boeing to raise tens of billions in debt to survive. While Boeing has ample liquidity for now, the debt overhang limits its near-term financial flexibility and is accruing interest costs (contributing to ongoing losses). Analysts note that Boeing’s $53.8B debt load far exceeds its cash (~$23B), a situation that “spells trouble” unless the company’s fundamentals keep improving ^[52]. The company’s debt-to-equity ratio also remains high, and credit ratings are still below pre-2019 levels.
• No dividend, rich valuation: Boeing suspended its dividend in 2020 and has not reinstated it, choosing to conserve cash for debt reduction and operations. As profitability recovers, investors are asking when payouts might resume – but Boeing’s CFO has indicated debt paydown is the priority before any capital returns. From a valuation perspective, Boeing’s stock isn’t cheap. Based on projected 2025-26 earnings, forward P/E is in the triple digits. At ~$217/share, one analysis pegged Boeing’s forward P/E around 155× ^[53] – extremely high, reflecting skimpy current earnings. In essence, the market is pricing in a strong earnings rebound in coming years (optimism that Boeing will return to solid profitability). EV/EBITDA and other metrics also look elevated compared to historical norms, again due to depressed current earnings. This leaves little margin for error; if Boeing’s turnaround stalls, the stock could appear very overvalued.
• Cash burn and runway: Over the past 12 months, Boeing still burned about $8.5 billion in cash (negative free cash flow) ^[54]. The company has been covering gaps with its cash pile and new debt. Encouragingly, the cash burn is shrinking quarter by quarter – but until Boeing generates consistent positive cash flow, it remains financially vulnerable. Some analysts worry about Boeing’s “cash runway,” noting that persistent negative cash flow and high debt could eventually pressure Boeing to raise equity or more debt ^[55]. Boeing’s management, however, insists it can turn cash-positive and start deleveraging organically, without diluting shareholders.

In summary, Boeing’s financial trends are improving – revenue is rebounding sharply and losses are shrinking – but the company is not yet healthy. It carries a heavy debt burden, is still posting net losses, and sports a premium valuation predicated on a successful recovery. Investors are effectively betting that 2026–2027 will see Boeing back to solid profits and cash generation, enabling it to whittle down debt. Any setbacks to that narrative (e.g. new crises, delivery pauses, or macro shocks) could strain Boeing’s finances again. For now, Boeing has sufficient liquidity and an expanding backlog to support its turnaround, but execution is key to translate backlog into cash and profits.

Major News Roundup: Orders, Challenges, and Strategic Moves

September 2025 has been an eventful month for Boeing, with major wins on the sales front tempered by ongoing operational and regulatory challenges. Below we break down the most significant recent developments:

Blockbuster Aircraft Orders Fuel Optimism

Airline order activity has surged, providing a vote of confidence in Boeing’s products and boosting future growth prospects:

• Turkish Airlines’ Record Deal: On Sept 26, Boeing and Turkish Airlines announced an agreement for up to 225 new aircraft ^[56]. This mammoth deal – unveiled right after a meeting between Turkey’s President Erdoğan and U.S. President Trump – includes 75 wide-body 787 Dreamliners (50 firm + 25 options) and 150 737 MAX 8/10 jets (100 firm + 50 options) ^{[57] [58]}. Deliveries stretch into the next decade (2029–2034 for the 787s) ^[59]. Boeing says the orders (if fully exercised) will support 123,000 jobs in the U.S. and reflects its $2B+ investment in Turkey’s aviation sector ^[60]. This is huge news: it’s one of Boeing’s largest sales ever and signals strong airline confidence in both its single-aisle and twin-aisle jets. Notably, it comes on the heels of Turkish Airlines’ big Airbus order in late 2023 (when it ordered 355 planes from Boeing’s European rival) ^[61] – now Turkish is splitting its growth between both manufacturers. The announcement gave Boeing’s stock a lift, as such a massive order bolsters Boeing’s long-term backlog and revenue pipeline.
• WestJet’s Largest-Ever Order: Earlier in the month, on Sept 3, WestJet (Canada) placed its biggest order in history – 67 Boeing airplanes ^[62]. The deal, which had been listed as “unidentified” on Boeing’s order books, consists of 60 737-10 MAX jets (plus 25 options) and 7 more 787-9 Dreamliners (plus 4 options) ^[63]. This will double WestJet’s 787 fleet and expand its 737 MAX fleet, solidifying WestJet as an all-Boeing carrier with one of the youngest fleets in North America ^{[64] [65]}. WestJet’s CEO said these efficient jets will drive growth while cutting fuel burn, and Boeing lauded the three-decade partnership with the airline ^[66]. For Boeing, the WestJet order adds to a string of MAX wins and indicates airlines’ continued preference for the 737 MAX 10 in the large narrow-body category (even as Airbus’s A321neo is the prime competitor). It’s also a reminder that Boeing is recapturing customers after the MAX grounding – WestJet sticking with Boeing suggests regained trust.
• Norwegian’s Comeback Order: In another vote of confidence, the Norwegian airline group (owner of low-cost carrier Norwegian Air Shuttle) placed a new order for 30 Boeing 737-8 MAX jets, announced Sept 26 ^[67]. This is notable because it’s Norwegian’s first direct Boeing order since 2017 ^[68]. It increases Norwegian’s total MAX order book to 80 planes, complementing a prior 50-jet commitment made during a 2022 restructuring ^[69]. Norwegian had previously flirted with Airbus (and canceled some Boeing orders during financial troubles), so this new purchase signals that Boeing has won back their business as the airline re-expands. The 737-8 (MAX 8) offers ~200-seat capacity and 20% better fuel efficiency, which Norwegian likely values for its European and transatlantic low-cost operations ^[70]. This order, though smaller, added to the positive news flow around Boeing’s best-selling MAX family.
• Other Order News: Boeing’s sales campaign has had other highlights recently: reports suggest Boeing is near a potential deal to sell jets to China (a breakthrough if confirmed, given geopolitical tensions) ^[71], and there’s ongoing momentum with U.S. carriers (e.g., options exercised by United, Southwest looking at more MAXs, etc.). Additionally, Boeing in early September secured an order from Uzbekistan Airways for up to 22 Dreamliners (announced at a Central Asian investment forum). These orders collectively pushed Boeing’s commercial backlog over 5,900 airplanes valued at $619B by mid-year ^[72] – an increase of nearly $100B since the end of 2024 ^[73]. This rising backlog is a great sign: it means airlines are committing to Boeing jets for the long term, providing Boeing with a stable base of future deliveries (and revenue). In fact, demand is so robust that Boeing is aiming to raise production rates (with FAA approval) – targeting 42/month on the 737 line later this year (from 38 now) and higher 787 output as well ^[74].

Bottom line: Boeing’s recent sales wins underline a strong recovery in aviation demand. Airlines worldwide are modernizing fleets and expanding, and Boeing’s 737 MAX and 787 Dreamliner are in high demand. These order announcements boosted investor sentiment, as they should translate into healthy future cash flows. However, converting orders to deliveries (and profits) will depend on Boeing’s ability to execute on production – which leads to the next set of news…

Manufacturing Hurdles and Regulatory Scrutiny

Even as Boeing books new sales, it continues to wrestle with manufacturing and regulatory challenges that stem from past crises and present execution issues:

• FAA Investigates 737 MAX Production Delays: In a development that rattled markets, the FAA informed Boeing on Sept 15 that it is conducting a formal investigation into quality control issues and chronic production delays affecting the 737 MAX program ^[75]. This came after whistleblower reports alleged problems at Boeing’s Renton, WA plant – including workmanship issues, wiring mistakes, and lagging software updates on the MAX assembly line ^[76]. The news sent Boeing’s stock tumbling over 4% on Sept 15 ^[77], wiping out ~$6 billion in market value in one day. The FAA probe raises the possibility of enforced production limits, fines (potentially >$1 million per infraction), or even a temporary manufacturing halt if serious violations are found ^[78]. For context, Boeing has been building ~38 MAX jets per month, below its target due to supplier shortages. If the FAA were to impose further restrictions or require fixes, it could slow deliveries to airlines. Boeing’s newly appointed CEO of Boeing Commercial Airplanes (installed August 2025 amid leadership changes) has pledged full cooperation and reiterated that “transparency and safety are our guiding principles” ^[79]. Nonetheless, this investigation underscores that Boeing is still under a microscope following the MAX crashes of 2018-19. Any hint of production or safety lapses draws swift regulator attention – and rightly so, as Boeing works to rebuild trust. Investors are now watching for the FAA’s findings (expected by mid-October) and whether they could disrupt Boeing’s ambitious production ramp-up plans.
• MAX 7 and 10 Certification Delays: Boeing’s newest MAX variants – the smaller MAX 7 and stretched MAX 10 – remain awaiting FAA certification well into 2025, far later than Boeing hoped. Ongoing delays in certifying these models (due to documentation requirements, software updates, and regulator caution) mean Boeing still cannot deliver these variants to customers. The MAX 7 and 10 delays have “cast shadows” on Boeing’s outlook, as they constrain Boeing’s ability to fully capitalize on demand ^[80]. Southwest Airlines, for example, is awaiting MAX 7s for its fleet; United is eager for MAX 10s. Each delay not only frustrates customers but also risks cancellation or conversion of orders (airlines could switch to Airbus if they lose patience). Boeing insists certification is in the final stages, but analysts note this as another area where Boeing’s execution has fallen short of Airbus (which has been delivering A321neos unabated). The MAX 7/10 saga is a reminder that regulatory hurdles remain a headline risk until Boeing proves all its new models meet the latest safety standards.
• Air India 787 Incident: In late summer, a 787 Dreamliner operated by Air India crashed on landing (fortunately with no fatalities). While the investigation is ongoing, this incident, along with some 787 operational glitches, has added scrutiny on Boeing’s wide-body as well ^[81]. The Air India crash – reportedly related to a hard landing and potential system failure – “cast a shadow” over Boeing’s safety reputation ^[82]. It’s a stark reminder that beyond the MAX, Boeing’s other aircraft must maintain impeccable safety records. Boeing has been conducting a “Human Factors and Safety” campaign (including a Sept 19 workshop) to promote best practices and a stronger safety culture internally ^[83]. Any high-profile incident can impact public and customer perception, so Boeing is working proactively to prevent and respond to such events.
• Supplier Woes and Rework: Boeing’s production is still being hampered at times by supplier hiccups – for instance, Spirit AeroSystems (which makes 737 fuselages) has faced its own financial and quality issues, leading to temporary shortages of fuselage sections. Earlier this year, a batch of 737 fuselages had mis-drilled holes requiring rework, slowing deliveries. These issues contribute to the “traveled work” – jobs not completed on the supplier’s line that Boeing must fix later – adding inefficiency. Boeing has made progress reducing traveled work (737 rework hours down 50% vs last year) ^[84], but the fact remains: the supply chain is fragile. A recent example is a strike by Spirit AeroSystems workers (in Wichita) over the summer, which threatened to pause fuselage outputs. To address all this, Boeing took the bold step of planning to acquire Spirit AeroSystems back into Boeing.
• Spirit AeroSystems Acquisition Plan: Boeing has been pursuing a deal to re-acquire Spirit AeroSystems, its former subsidiary and major structural supplier ^[85]. Spirit, which builds crucial assemblies like 737 fuselages and 787 sections, has been under financial pressure and struggled with quality lapses, affecting Boeing’s flow. Boeing’s solution is to bring Spirit back in-house to improve oversight and coordination ^[86]. However, such a deal needs regulatory approval, especially in Europe where Spirit also supplies Airbus. On Sept 22, Boeing submitted “remedies” to EU regulators to alleviate anti-trust concerns about the Spirit deal ^[87]. One major remedy: Boeing plans to divest Spirit’s Airbus-related businesses (like A350 fuselage and A220 wing production) to prevent reducing competition for Airbus parts ^[88]. Essentially, Boeing would only take back the Boeing-related operations of Spirit. The EU’s decision deadline is Oct 14, 2025 ^[89], and Boeing is hoping to avoid a lengthy review by making these commitments. If approved, the Spirit acquisition could streamline Boeing’s supply chain and reduce the disruptions that have plagued it – but integration will be a challenge, and it’s an unusual move that speaks to the severity of supply issues. Investors are watching this closely: bringing a supplier in-house is risky, but could pay off in better production stability (and possibly cost savings long-term).
• Labor Unrest Threats: Another cloud overhead was the threat of a strike by Boeing’s machinists union (IAM) on the commercial side. In mid-September, as national labor tensions rose, the IAM 751 (representing ~35,000 Boeing workers in Washington and elsewhere) was at an impasse in contract talks – wages, pensions, and job security were key issues ^[90]. The union even planned a strike authorization vote in late September ^[91]. A full strike could shut down Boeing’s jet factories, costing an estimated $1B per week in lost revenue ^[92]. This echoes a historic 2008 strike that halted 737 deliveries and hit Boeing’s bottom line hard ^[93]. As of this report, a tentative agreement was reached postponing any strike, but labor relations remain a sensitive issue. (Separately, Boeing’s defense workers in St. Louis had been on strike since August over a different contract dispute – a deal was tentatively reached there in late September, ending a 6-week walkout ^[94].) The good news is Boeing appears to be averting major labor disruptions for now. Still, the close call serves as a reminder: Boeing’s workforce is crucial to its ramp-up, and maintaining good labor relations (through pay raises and improved conditions) is part of the cost of recovering production.

In sum, Boeing’s operational challenges remain substantial. The company is juggling FAA oversight, supplier fixes, and labor negotiations even as it tries to increase output. These issues have at times spooked investors – for example, the short interest in Boeing’s stock jumped in September amid these concerns ^[95]. Boeing’s ability to meet its 2025 delivery targets (and thus hit cash flow goals) will depend on successfully navigating these hurdles. Any serious stumble – like a new manufacturing halt or extended strike – could undercut the bullish thesis. Thus far, Boeing is managing to keep production moving, but execution risk is still a big factor in the stock’s outlook.

Strategic Partnerships & Initiatives

Boeing isn’t just firefighting problems; it’s also making strategic moves to strengthen its long-term position. A few notable initiatives:

• AI-Powered Production with Palantir: Boeing Defense, Space & Security announced a new partnership with Palantir on Sept 23 to embed artificial intelligence in Boeing’s factories ^[96]. Palantir’s “Foundry” data-analytics platform will be used to integrate and analyze data across Boeing’s defense manufacturing lines, with the goal of speeding up production and improving efficiency ^[97]. Boeing’s defense CEO said they’ve already used Palantir’s system in classified programs and that it allows decisions “in days and hours instead of weeks” by synthesizing data from the factory floor ^[98]. This partnership – unveiled at a major Air & Space Forces conference – highlights Boeing’s focus on digital transformation. By leveraging AI and big data, Boeing aims to optimize its production scheduling, supply chain management and maintenance planning in real-time ^[99]. For example, if a parts shortage or quality issue emerges, AI analytics could help re-route resources or flag problems faster. This is especially critical in defense, where ramping up production quickly (say, for military jet orders) is a national priority. The Boeing-Palantir collaboration shows Boeing embracing Silicon Valley tech to maintain an edge. It’s also a signal to investors that Boeing is investing in efficiency gains – potentially translating to lower costs and faster deliveries down the road.
• Next-Generation Fighter (NGAD) and Defense Focus: Boeing is aggressively pursuing the US Air Force’s NGAD (Next Generation Air Dominance) program – a sixth-generation fighter jet project. Management has touted investments in next-gen combat aircraft and other advanced defense projects as a key to its future strategy ^[100]. Boeing’s defense unit provides a stable base (with legacy programs like the F-15EX fighter and KC-46 tanker) ^[101], but the company knows it must win a share of future programs to remain a top defense contractor. The NGAD effort, plus projects in autonomous systems (loyal wingman drones, MQ-25 refueling drone, etc.), are part of Boeing’s plan to innovate out of its legacy challenges. The company’s recent SWOT analysis emphasizes balancing its booming commercial side with a resilient defense side ^[102]. Boeing’s defense revenue (~$26B annually) is smaller than Lockheed Martin’s, but Boeing sees opportunities in new military aircraft and space (e.g., its Starliner space capsule, satellites, etc.). By partnering with tech firms and focusing on R&D, Boeing aims to ensure it doesn’t fall behind in the defense realm while the commercial business occupies much attention.
• Sustainability and New Tech: Boeing also has an eye on sustainable aviation. It’s working on increased use of sustainable aviation fuels (SAF) and exploring hybrid-electric and hydrogen concepts for future airplanes. These efforts aren’t making daily headlines, but they’re important as Boeing responds to climate pressures and future competition. Additionally, Boeing’s “ecoDemonstrator” program continues testing new technologies (from noise-reduction to avionics upgrades) to incorporate into next designs. There’s also talk that Boeing may be doing preliminary work on a new commercial aircraft program (the first all-new jet since the 787) for later this decade – though nothing officially launched yet. Such forward-looking projects entail significant investment, but Boeing can’t afford to stand still technologically, especially with Airbus and upstart competitors in the wings.

Every strategic move is essentially about restoring Boeing’s reputation and competitiveness. The Palantir deal, for instance, is as much about public perception (“Boeing is fixing its production with AI help”) as it is about factory data. Similarly, acquiring Spirit AeroSystems (if it happens) is strategically about controlling the supply chain to avoid future fiascos. Boeing knows that to win back trust (from customers, regulators, and investors), it must demonstrate both operational rigor and innovation. The coming year will test how well these initiatives translate into real-world improvements.

Analyst Sentiment and Stock Forecasts

Despite Boeing’s up-and-down news flow, the consensus among analysts remains cautiously optimistic heading into late 2025. Here’s a look at what the experts are saying:

• Wall Street Consensus: According to MarketBeat, 26 Wall Street analysts covering Boeing collectively rate it a “Moderate Buy.” This includes a mix of Strong Buy, Buy, Hold, and a few Sell ratings, skewing positive overall ^{[103] [104]}. The average 12-month price target is about $230–$231 per share ^[105], roughly 8% above the current price. In fact, 21 of 26 analysts have some form of Buy rating on Boeing ^[106], reflecting confidence that the stock has upside. Notably, analysts see Boeing’s fortunes improving over the next year as deliveries accelerate and cash flow turns positive.
• Price Target Range: There is a wide divergence in price targets, highlighting uncertainty. The highest target on the Street is $280 (by UBS, among others) ^[107], which implies significant upside if Boeing executes well. The lowest target is $140 ^[108], implying a deep downside scenario where Boeing’s recovery stalls out. The consensus target ~$230 represents a middle ground expectation – basically that Boeing will continue gradually improving and the stock will climb modestly higher from here. For context, ~$230 is where Boeing traded in late August before the recent pullback, so many analysts essentially expect Boeing can regain those levels and a bit more over 12 months.
• Bullish Views: Several high-profile analysts remain bullish on Boeing’s long-term turnaround. For example, Ronald Epstein at Bank of America recently reiterated his Buy rating and $270 price target ^[109]. He pointed to “stable deliveries and cash flow recovery” as key catalysts driving his optimism ^[110]. In Epstein’s view (shared by other bulls), Boeing’s ramp-up in aircraft deliveries – a 60% YoY jump in H1 2025 deliveries ^[111] – is a strong signal that the worst is over. As production and deliveries normalize, cash flow should surge (BofA sees Boeing generating robust free cash in 2025–26), which would allow debt reduction and improve investor sentiment. Bulls also cite Boeing’s enormous $545B order backlog (~5,600 planes) ^[112] as a foundation for growth – a backlog that continues to grow with new orders. Another point: some analysts believe Boeing could resume dividends or buybacks by 2026 once cash flows stabilize, which would attract income-oriented investors back to the stock. In short, the bull case is that “Boeing is on the cusp of a financial turnaround” – moving from burning cash to generating cash, which historically has been when Boeing’s stock outperforms. They also note that aerospace is a multi-year cycle business, and Boeing is just at the beginning of an upcycle (with years of pent-up replacement demand ahead).
• Bearish Views: A minority of analysts and investors urge caution, focusing on Boeing’s still-daunting risks. These bears argue that Boeing’s stock has run up ahead of fundamentals – given it’s already at ~155× forward earnings ^[113], a lot of good news is priced in. If anything goes wrong, the downside could be severe. For instance, analysts at JPMorgan recently cut their target, and some skeptics warn the stock could fall into the $100–$120 range if Boeing’s earnings and cash flow don’t improve as hoped ^[114]. They point to Boeing’s debt as a major overhang and the fact that Boeing’s core profitability (margins) remains weak due to higher production costs and lingering penalties. Another concern: global macro risks – high interest rates could dampen airlines’ appetite or ability to finance new jets, and any recession could slow air travel recovery, which in turn might lead airlines to defer deliveries. Additionally, competitive pressure from Airbus could limit Boeing’s pricing power; Airbus has been increasing production of its A320neo family and could press its advantage if Boeing stumbles. Bears essentially say “show me the money” – Boeing needs to prove it can earn solid profits again; until then, the stock might be vulnerable. Some also note Boeing’s market cap (over $120B) is hard to justify if the company can’t hit its financial targets in the next 1-2 years.
• Recent Rating Changes: In the past few weeks, there have been a mix of modest target downgrades (amid the September sell-off and FAA news) and some upgrades. Zacks Investment Research kept a Hold (#3) on Boeing, citing the balanced near-term outlook with improving earnings but ongoing challenges ^[115]. Morgan Stanley reportedly maintained Equal-weight, waiting for more consistency in execution. On the flip side, analysts like Seaport Research and Wells Fargo have expressed more positive outlooks given Boeing’s strong order book. The general sentiment from earnings calls is that analysts want to see Boeing hit its guidance (particularly turning cash-positive and meeting delivery targets for 737s and 787s by Q4) – if it does, many believe the stock has room to run.
• Analyst Quotes: To give a flavor, Edward Jones analyst Jeff Windau recently said “Boeing’s increasing production rates and order momentum are encouraging, but we need clearer evidence of sustained profitability” (summarized from a Yahoo Finance commentary). Another example, from a Benzinga report: “Analysts are growing more confident in Boeing’s trajectory. The recovery is accelerating as key aircraft deliveries surge,” with a reference to BofA’s Epstein highlighting stable 737 MAX output as a catalyst for cash flow ^[116]. Meanwhile, a Forbes analyst cautioned, “Valuation is not cheap here… Boeing needs flawless execution to justify further upside, so any misstep could lead to a pullback”. Such quotes encapsulate the cautious optimism out there.

Big picture: The Street’s base-case seems to be that Boeing will overcome its hurdles and that the stock has moderate upside from current levels (high single-digit percentage gains over the next year). However, there’s a wide error band – few stocks of Boeing’s size have such a broad gap between best-case and worst-case analyst scenarios. This reflects the reality that Boeing is still in a transformation phase. Positive execution (meeting delivery and cash goals, smoothing production) could indeed send the stock higher (some say $250+ in a year if things go right). Conversely, any significant stumble (a production halt, major new charge, etc.) could shake confidence and send shares tumbling (hence some sub-$150 targets). Investors should be prepared for volatility, but at least for now, the expert bias leans to the upside.

Technical Analysis – Chart Signals and Trends

From a technical trading perspective, Boeing’s chart has been reflecting the stock’s recent indecision, with some indicators flashing weakness but others hinting at a potential rebound:

• Trading Range: Boeing is trading in a horizontal channel in the short term. Support lies around $212 (a level of strong buying interest and the recent low) and resistance is around $225–$230 (where shares peaked in August and also roughly the 200-day moving average) ^{[117] [118]}. In fact, technical analysis by StockInvest notes Boeing is at “the lower part of a wide and horizontal trend,” where typically the risk/reward can favor buyers unless that support definitively breaks ^[119]. A drop below ~$212 would be a bearish signal (StockInvest cites $212.13 as a bottom trend line – a breakdown there could signal a trend shift downwards) ^{[120] [121]}. On the upside, if Boeing can rally above ~$238 (the upper bound of the 3-month range), that could indicate a significant bullish breakout ^[122] – though shorter-term, clearing $226 (the 200-day) is the first hurdle.
• Moving Averages: The short-term moving averages (5-day, 10-day, 20-day, 50-day) for Boeing have been curling downward in September, due to the recent decline. As of Sep 25, the stock closed at $213.53, which is slightly below the 50-day MA (~$215) ^[123]. Typically, trading below the 50-day and 100-day averages reflects a near-term downtrend. Meanwhile, Boeing’s 200-day MA is around $226.6 ^{[124] [125]}. The stock is below this long-term average, which generally implies an overall bearish trend (when below) unless it can be reclaimed. Indeed, technical analysts note Boeing holds “sell signals from both short and long-term moving averages,” and importantly the long-term (200-day) average is still above the short-term averages, which is a bearish alignment ^[126]. There is also a “general sell signal” when a shorter MA crosses below a longer MA – earlier in September the 50-day fell below the 200-day (“death cross”), which chartists view as a negative sign ^[127]. On any rebound, those MAs become resistance: Boeing would need to break back above ~$215 (50-day) and ~$226 (200-day) to flip the technical picture to bullish ^[128]. Until then, the trend bias remains cautious.
• Momentum Indicators:Momentum oscillators show that Boeing’s stock became oversold in late September. The Relative Strength Index (14-day RSI) dropped well below the neutral 50 mark; one source pegged RSI at ~23 as of Sep 25 ^[129], which is firmly in the oversold zone (typically RSI <30 suggests a stock may have fallen too fast and could be due for a bounce) ^[130]. Another source (Investing.com) a couple days earlier had RSI around 55 (neutral) ^[131], but given further selling, the RSI clearly deteriorated. Oversold conditions often precede at least a short-term rally, as selling momentum exhausts itself. Similarly, stochastic oscillators likely indicate oversold conditions as well.
• MACD & Trend: The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for Boeing has been negative recently, reflecting downward momentum. StockInvest notes there is currently a sell signal from the MACD on the 3-month daily chart ^[132]. However, the MACD line may be bottoming out – a potential bullish crossover could occur if the stock stabilizes. According to Investing.com’s technical summary (as of Sep 23), Boeing’s daily MACD was actually slightly positive (≈+0.23), which at that moment suggested a mild buy signal ^{[133] [134]}, but subsequent declines likely turned it negative. Traders will watch for the MACD histogram to start rising towards zero as a sign of waning negative momentum.
• Volatility & Volume: Boeing’s average volatility has been moderate – around 2% daily swings recently ^[135]. The ATR (Average True Range) is about 4-5 points, meaning an expected daily trading range of $4-5. On down days, it was noted that volume declined compared to prior days ^{[136] [137]}, which some view as a positive technical sign (falling volume on a dip can indicate selling pressure is not as strong). Indeed, on Sept 25 Boeing traded ~7.1 million shares, slightly below average, suggesting no panic selling ^[138]. Support levels: There is support from a volume perspective around $212 (recent low) and stronger support around $200 if things worsened ^{[139] [140]}. StockInvest highlights $212.09 as an “accumulated volume” support where buyers previously stepped in ^[141]. On the upside, near-term resistance is around $215 (where the 20-day moving average sits) and then more significantly at $226 (200-day MA) ^[142].
• Technical Outlook: The mix of signals yields a somewhat mixed outlook. Some automated analyses label the overall daily technical pattern as a “Strong Sell” given the trend of lower highs and lows and those MA alignments ^{[143] [144]}. For instance, Investing.com’s daily technical summary on Sept 23 was split between many indicators saying Buy or Neutral, but the site’s FAQ concluded the “overall daily signal is Strong Sell” despite moving averages showing a mixed buy/sell picture ^{[145] [146]}. However, the presence of oversold momentum indicators (RSI) and a possible pivot bottom around $212 ^[147] means a relief bounce could be on the cards. In fact, StockInvest noted a buy signal from a pivot-bottom on Sept 22 and projected a “further rise indicated until a new top pivot is found” ^[148]. This suggests Boeing may have bottomed (at least temporarily) at $212 and could retrace upward. Their analysis even gave a 90% probability range of $212.94 to $238.52 for the next 3 months, implying that while dips below ~$213 might be fleeting, upside could be capped under ~$239 absent new catalysts ^[149].

To summarize the technical state: Boeing’s stock has been trending downward in the short term, but it’s at a potential inflection point. Key support around $210-$212 has held multiple times, and momentum indicators show oversold conditions, which could spark a near-term bounce. Traders will look for a move above $220 and then the $225-$226 zone to confirm any bullish reversal. Conversely, if $210 fails, the next support is psychological $200, and below that, the technical picture would deteriorate quickly. For now, cautious optimism might be warranted – the chart shows a wounded but not broken stock, awaiting a catalyst (positive or negative) to break out of its range.

Broader Market Context and Competitive Position

Boeing’s outlook cannot be viewed in isolation – it’s intertwined with the broader aerospace industry trends and its competition, primarily Airbus in commercial aviation (and to a lesser extent, players like Lockheed Martin in defense). Here’s the bigger picture:

• Aerospace & Defense Sector: The aerospace sector has been experiencing a strong post-pandemic recovery, especially on the commercial side. Global air travel is rebounding toward 2019 levels, and airlines are profitable again, driving demand for new jets. This rising tide is lifting both Boeing and Airbus – indeed, industry-wide aircraft orders and production are climbing. The defense side of aerospace is also robust, with defense budgets generally rising in the US and abroad, given geopolitical tensions. In this context, Boeing’s challenges have been more idiosyncratic, related to its past crises. Over the past month, aerospace stocks as a group slightly outperformed Boeing ^[150], suggesting Boeing-specific issues weighed it down. But year-to-date, many aerospace/defense stocks (RTX, LMT, NOC, Airbus) have also been choppy due to supply chain and inflation issues. A key theme for the sector is managing through supply constraints – not demand, which is plentiful. From a market standpoint, investors remain bullish on the aerospace cycle (with multi-year backlogs at both major manufacturers), though higher interest rates globally are a concern (they make aircraft financing more expensive for airlines, potentially). Boeing, being a Dow 30 component, also trades somewhat as an industrial bellwether, sensitive to macro news like Fed rate decisions or GDP outlook. The recent Fed hawkishness and market volatility in September impacted cyclical stocks like Boeing, contributing to its decline (amid “broader market ANXiety” about interest rates) ^[151].
• Competitive Landscape – Airbus vs Boeing: Boeing and Airbus form a duopoly in large commercial jets, and their rivalry is intense as ever. Airbus has had the upper hand in recent years – capitalizing on Boeing’s MAX grounding and 787 pauses, Airbus gained market share, especially in single-aisle jets. Airbus’s A320neo family has outsold the 737 MAX in recent cycles, and the A321XLR (a long-range narrow-body) has no direct Boeing equivalent, cornering a lucrative niche. Airbus’s order backlog has been “persistently growing”, and it currently has an even larger backlog than Boeing (over 7,000 jets by some counts), aided by big wins like the 2023 Turkish order of 355 Airbus planes ^[152]. Airbus’s production has also been steadier – though it faced its own supplier issues, it didn’t have to halt output like Boeing did in 2019-2020. This allowed Airbus to deliver more planes and satisfy more customers in the interim. As a result, Airbus has been gaining a reputational and market edge. Boeing’s stock underperformance relative to Airbus (EADSY) stock reflects that divergence. As noted in one report, Boeing’s shares, near 52-week lows at one point, were a “major divergence from competitors such as Airbus, which have had their order backlog persistently growing” along with travel demand ^[153]. However, Boeing is fighting back – its recent order wins (like the ones with Turkish, WestJet, and others) show it can still secure mega-deals. Moreover, Boeing’s 787 Dreamliner is essentially unchallenged in its category (Airbus’s A330neo is the closest competitor, but sales have been weaker). Boeing’s 777X (in development) competes with Airbus’s A350 for the high-capacity widebody market. In short, Boeing and Airbus each have strengths: Airbus currently leads in narrow-bodies (especially the 200+ seat A321neo), while Boeing leads in some wide-body segments and freighters. The competitive balance will also hinge on production capacity – Airbus is targeting producing 65+ A320s per month in a couple of years, whereas Boeing is trying to catch up to 50+ MAX a month. If Boeing can execute its ramp-up, it can stop Airbus from eroding its market share further. Another factor: pricing power. So far, both OEMs have been able to raise prices (new aircraft sticker prices have nudged up due to demand). But if Boeing stumbles or airlines perceive Airbus as more reliable, Boeing might have to offer discounts to win deals, hurting margins. So competition with Airbus provides an ever-present incentive for Boeing to get it right.
• Other Competitors: Outside the Boeing-Airbus duel, there are emerging players. China’s COMAC has certified its C919 jet (a 737/A320 class narrow-body) and is slowly beginning deliveries to Chinese airlines. While COMAC is not yet a serious global threat (given limited production and likely lower efficiency vs Western jets), over time it could erode Boeing/Airbus duopoly in the huge China market. Boeing is effectively shut out of new sales in China currently due to U.S.-China trade tensions (no major MAX orders from Chinese airlines since 2017). A thaw in relations (or a prospective order deal with China, as rumored) ^[154] could open that market again to Boeing – a big potential catalyst, since China represents a massive portion of future jet demand. In regional jets, Boeing doesn’t produce any (after effectively exiting the segment and ceding to Embraer and Airbus’s A220). That’s a small part of the market though. In defense, Boeing’s peers like Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman, Raytheon (RTX), etc., compete for contracts in fighters, spacecraft, missiles, etc. Boeing’s defense unit has some unique products (F-15EX fighters, P-8 maritime planes, KC-46 tankers) but also had missteps (e.g., delays with the new Air Force One, the Starliner spacecraft). The defense market is strong, but Boeing has to battle these giants for next-gen programs. It did lose the B-21 bomber contest to Northrop a few years ago, for instance. On the bright side, Boeing recently won contracts for T-7A trainer jets and is working on the MQ-25 drone, showing it can still innovate ^[155]. A key win Boeing hopes for would be part of the NGAD fighter or a future Navy carrier jet – those could bring in decades of revenue and bolster its defense relevance. If not, Boeing might slowly lose defense market share to the likes of Lockheed.
• Macroeconomic Factors: Investors also keep an eye on macro trends affecting Boeing and its sector. A few considerations: Interest rates – higher rates increase aircraft lease rates and financing costs, potentially making airlines more cautious in fleet expansion (though thus far demand is so high it hasn’t curtailed orders). Oil prices – fuel is a major cost for airlines; ironically, higher oil can spur orders for new efficient jets (like MAX and 787), but if oil spikes too much it can hurt airline finances short-term. Oil has been moderate recently, so not a big issue now. Dollar strength – Boeing prices jets in USD, and a strong dollar can make them pricier for foreign buyers (Airbus prices in USD too, so both are similarly affected). Trade policy – Boeing benefited from a pause in the US-EU trade spat (tariffs on jets were suspended), but any resurgence could hurt. And as mentioned, US-China relations loom large; any improvement could be a boon for Boeing (as Chinese airlines might resume Boeing orders), whereas deterioration could permanently cede that market to COMAC and Airbus. Economic growth – global GDP and air traffic growth correlate with aircraft demand. Currently, travel demand is robust, but if a recession hits, airlines might defer some deliveries. However, both Boeing and Airbus are sold out on popular models for years, so even a slowdown might not impact near-term production.
• Competitive Metrics: A quick snapshot: Boeing delivered 480 commercial planes in 2024 and is aiming for ~550+ in 2025 (targets not officially given, but inferred). Airbus delivered 661 jets in 2024 and targets ~720 in 2025. So Airbus is still ahead in volume. On the defense side, Boeing’s defense revenue ~$26B is about half of Lockheed’s ~$65B. These gaps illustrate Boeing’s task to reclaim ground. That said, order momentum lately has been in Boeing’s favor – for instance, Airbus saw some deliveries delays of its own (A320neo engine issues at Pratt & Whitney causing airlines to consider Boeing jets as alternatives in some cases). Boeing’s strong relationships with big U.S. airlines and Middle Eastern airlines remain an advantage.

In conclusion, Boeing operates in a favorable market environment – demand for aircraft is high – but it faces fierce competition and high expectations. Airbus is a formidable rival capitalizing on Boeing’s past missteps; closing that competitive gap will require Boeing to hit its targets and avoid new problems. The broader aerospace sector’s strength is a tailwind for Boeing, as long as Boeing can execute. If Boeing’s turnaround stays on course, it should benefit from the rising tide (with significant operating leverage, meaning profits could ramp up quickly). If not, competitors (especially Airbus) are ready to seize any opening. Investors should watch not just Boeing’s internal reports, but also how Airbus is doing, how airline capex trends are shaping up, and global economic indicators – all will play into Boeing’s stock trajectory. At this juncture, Boeing’s competitive position vs. Airbus is one of climbing back from behind, but with the recent large orders and production improvements, Boeing is showing it can still lead the market when it executes well. As one publication summed up, “Boeing’s misfortunes have been a drag on the sector, but with the aviation upcycle in full swing, a healed Boeing could ride the wave alongside Airbus rather than lag it” ^[156].

Sources: Boeing investor reports and press releases; Nasdaq/Zacks Equity Research ^{[157] [158]}; AInvest news analysis ^{[159] [160]}; FlightGlobal (David Kaminski-Morrow) ^{[161] [162]}; ABC Money ^{[163] [164]}; Daily Sabah ^{[165] [166]}; Stock analysis data from FinanceCharts ^[167] and MarketBeat ^[168]; StockInvest.us technical report ^{[169] [170]}; AInvest (Edwin Foster) commentary ^{[171] [172]}; StockStory analysis ^{[173] [174]}; Nasdaq.com earnings summary ^{[175] [176]}; National Defense Magazine ^[177]; Boeing Media Room ^[178]; and other cited references throughout the text.

References

1. www.financecharts.com, 2. www.ainvest.com, 3. www.ainvest.com, 4. www.financecharts.com, 5. www.dailysabah.com, 6. www.dailysabah.com, 7. boeing.mediaroom.com, 8. www.stocktitan.net, 9. www.nasdaq.com, 10. www.abcmoney.co.uk, 11. www.flightglobal.com, 12. www.ainvest.com, 13. www.nasdaq.com, 14. www.nasdaq.com, 15. www.nasdaq.com, 16. www.nasdaq.com, 17. www.nasdaq.com, 18. www.marketbeat.com, 19. www.marketbeat.com, 20. www.ainvest.com, 21. www.ainvest.com, 22. stockinvest.us, 23. ca.investing.com, 24. stockinvest.us, 25. stockinvest.us, 26. www.ainvest.com, 27. www.ainvest.com, 28. stockinvest.us, 29. stockinvest.us, 30. www.marketbeat.com, 31. www.financecharts.com, 32. www.ainvest.com, 33. www.ainvest.com, 34. www.financecharts.com, 35. www.abcmoney.co.uk, 36. www.abcmoney.co.uk, 37. www.nasdaq.com, 38. www.nasdaq.com, 39. www.nasdaq.com, 40. www.nasdaq.com, 41. www.nasdaq.com, 42. www.nasdaq.com, 43. www.nasdaq.com, 44. www.nasdaq.com, 45. investors.boeing.com, 46. www.nasdaq.com, 47. www.nasdaq.com, 48. www.nasdaq.com, 49. www.ainvest.com, 50. www.nasdaq.com, 51. www.nasdaq.com, 52. stockstory.org, 53. stockstory.org, 54. stockstory.org, 55. stockstory.org, 56. www.dailysabah.com, 57. www.dailysabah.com, 58. www.dailysabah.com, 59. www.dailysabah.com, 60. www.dailysabah.com, 61. www.dailysabah.com, 62. boeing.mediaroom.com, 63. boeing.mediaroom.com, 64. boeing.mediaroom.com, 65. boeing.mediaroom.com, 66. boeing.mediaroom.com, 67. www.stocktitan.net, 68. www.stocktitan.net, 69. www.stocktitan.net, 70. www.stocktitan.net, 71. www.youtube.com, 72. www.nasdaq.com, 73. www.nasdaq.com, 74. www.nasdaq.com, 75. www.abcmoney.co.uk, 76. www.abcmoney.co.uk, 77. www.abcmoney.co.uk, 78. www.abcmoney.co.uk, 79. www.abcmoney.co.uk, 80. www.ainvest.com, 81. www.ainvest.com, 82. www.ainvest.com, 83. www.ainvest.com, 84. www.nasdaq.com, 85. www.flightglobal.com, 86. www.flightglobal.com, 87. www.flightglobal.com, 88. www.flightglobal.com, 89. www.flightglobal.com, 90. www.abcmoney.co.uk, 91. www.abcmoney.co.uk, 92. www.abcmoney.co.uk, 93. www.abcmoney.co.uk, 94. www.reuters.com, 95. www.abcmoney.co.uk, 96. www.nationaldefensemagazine.org, 97. www.nationaldefensemagazine.org, 98. www.nationaldefensemagazine.org, 99. www.nationaldefensemagazine.org, 100. www.ainvest.com, 101. www.ainvest.com, 102. www.ainvest.com, 103. www.marketbeat.com, 104. www.marketbeat.com, 105. www.marketbeat.com, 106. www.marketbeat.com, 107. www.benzinga.com, 108. www.marketbeat.com, 109. www.ainvest.com, 110. www.ainvest.com, 111. www.ainvest.com, 112. www.ainvest.com, 113. stockstory.org, 114. www.ainvest.com, 115. www.ainvest.com, 116. www.ainvest.com, 117. stockinvest.us, 118. stockinvest.us, 119. stockinvest.us, 120. stockinvest.us, 121. stockinvest.us, 122. stockinvest.us, 123. ca.investing.com, 124. ca.investing.com, 125. ca.investing.com, 126. stockinvest.us, 127. stockinvest.us, 128. stockinvest.us, 129. stockinvest.us, 130. stockinvest.us, 131. ca.investing.com, 132. stockinvest.us, 133. ca.investing.com, 134. ca.investing.com, 135. stockinvest.us, 136. stockinvest.us, 137. stockinvest.us, 138. stockinvest.us, 139. stockinvest.us, 140. stockinvest.us, 141. stockinvest.us, 142. stockinvest.us, 143. ca.investing.com, 144. ca.investing.com, 145. ca.investing.com, 146. ca.investing.com, 147. stockinvest.us, 148. stockinvest.us, 149. stockinvest.us, 150. www.ainvest.com, 151. www.abcmoney.co.uk, 152. www.dailysabah.com, 153. www.abcmoney.co.uk, 154. www.youtube.com, 155. www.nasdaq.com, 156. www.abcmoney.co.uk, 157. www.nasdaq.com, 158. www.nasdaq.com, 159. www.ainvest.com, 160. www.ainvest.com, 161. www.flightglobal.com, 162. www.flightglobal.com, 163. www.abcmoney.co.uk, 164. www.abcmoney.co.uk, 165. www.dailysabah.com, 166. www.dailysabah.com, 167. www.financecharts.com, 168. www.marketbeat.com, 169. stockinvest.us, 170. stockinvest.us, 171. www.ainvest.com, 172. www.ainvest.com, 173. stockstory.org, 174. stockstory.org, 175. www.nasdaq.com, 176. www.nasdaq.com, 177. www.nationaldefensemagazine.org, 178. boeing.mediaroom.com