E.W. Scripps (SSP) Soars as Sinclair Builds 8.2% Stake and Pushes for Takeover on November 17, 2025

On November 17, 2025, Sinclair Inc. disclosed an 8.2% stake in The E.W. Scripps Company (NASDAQ: SSP) and confirmed it is pursuing a merger, sending SSP stock more than 20% higher. Here’s what the potential Sinclair–Scripps deal means for investors, the local TV landscape and sports rights.

The E.W. Scripps Company (NASDAQ: SSP) is at the center of one of the biggest media storylines of 2025 after rival broadcaster Sinclair Inc. (NASDAQ: SBGI) revealed it has quietly built an 8.2% stake in Scripps’ Class A non‑voting shares and is actively pushing for a takeover. ^[1]

The disclosure, made in a regulatory filing and highlighted in multiple news reports, triggered a sharp rally in SSP shares and a wave of speculation about consolidation across the local TV and sports‑rights ecosystem. ^[2]

Key takeaways for today (17 November 2025)

Sinclair has acquired about 8.2% of Scripps’ Class A non‑voting shares and says it has been in talks “for months” about a merger that would combine the two broadcasters. ^[3]
Scripps’ board publicly responded this morning, stressing it remains focused on its own strategic plan while vowing to “take all steps appropriate” to protect shareholders from opportunistic actions by Sinclair or others. ^[4]
SSP stock jumped roughly 20–23% in pre‑market and early trading, briefly valuing the company at more than $320 million, while Sinclair shares also traded higher. ^[5]
Sinclair’s filing and subsequent reporting suggest a deal pitch that:
- Targets more than $300 million in annual cost synergies,
- Requires no external financing, and
- Could value Scripps at roughly three times its recent average share price for investors in a combined company. ^[6]
The move comes less than two weeks after Scripps reported Q3 2025 results that showed pressure on revenues and earnings but progress on deleveraging and sports‑driven growth in key areas. ^[7]

What happened today: Sinclair goes public with its Scripps bet

In a filing and accompanying communications, Sinclair disclosed that it has built an 8.2% position in Scripps’ outstanding Class A non‑voting shares and is seeking to merge the two companies. ^[8]

Reporting from Reuters, The Wall Street Journal and others indicates: ^[9]

Sinclair has been in “constructive talks” for several months with Scripps about a potential deal.
The proposed transaction would combine Sinclair’s roughly 178 local stations in about 80 markets with Scripps’ portfolio of more than 60 stations across 40+ markets and national networks. ^[10]
Sinclair believes a merger would create significant long‑term shareholder value, citing over $300 million in expected annual synergies based on publicly available financials. ^[11]
The company has signaled that no new external financing would be required, with the combined entity expected to reduce Scripps’ leverage. ^[12]

A Bloomberg Law summary of the filing similarly highlighted the synergy target and the assertion that the deal could be financed without tapping new debt or equity markets. ^[13]

Scripps’ response: firm tone, open door

Scripps answered quickly with an early‑morning press release titled “Scripps responds to Sinclair share purchase.” ^[14]

In that statement, the company:

Confirmed Sinclair’s disclosure that it had acquired about 8.2% of Scripps’ Class A non‑voting shares. ^[15]
Emphasized that its board and management are “focused on driving value” through the execution of Scripps’ existing strategic plan, which includes sports rights expansion, portfolio optimization and debt reduction. ^[16]
Reiterated that the board “has and will continue to evaluate” transactions and alternatives that could enhance shareholder value. ^[17]
Warned that it will “take all steps appropriate to protect” the company and its shareholders from opportunistic actions, language clearly aimed at Sinclair’s unsolicited buildup. ^[18]

Quiver Quantitative, which republished and summarized the press release, noted that Scripps’ language reflects a defensive posture even as it keeps the possibility of value‑enhancing deals on the table. ^[19]

Market reaction: SSP rockets as traders price in M&A optionality

The takeover chatter lit a fire under SSP shares before the opening bell:

Pre‑market: Bloomberg and GuruFocus both reported SSP was up roughly 19–23%, trading near $3.65 per share ahead of the cash session. ^[20]
After the open: Reuters reported an 18.6% jump shortly after trading began, implying an equity value of about $322 million for Scripps. ^[21]
Investing.com described the move as a “stock surge” of around 21% following the stake disclosure. ^[22]

Sinclair shares also traded higher on the day, as investors digested the potential for cost synergies and renewed scale after the company dramatically restructured its sports holdings earlier this year. ^[23]

Quiver data additionally show heavy institutional activity in SSP during Q3 2025, with dozens of funds adding or trimming positions ahead of today’s news, underscoring how controversial — and potentially mispriced — the stock has been. ^[24]

Important: Prices and percentage moves above reflect intraday trading as of November 17, 2025, and may have changed since publication.

Why Scripps is in play: stations, spectrum and women’s sports

At the heart of Sinclair’s interest is Scripps’ unique mix of local stations, national networks, sports rights and valuable spectrum holdings.

According to the company and recent press releases, Scripps:

Operates more than 60 local TV stations in over 40 U.S. markets, making it one of the country’s largest local broadcasters. ^[25]
Owns national networks including Scripps News, Court TV and entertainment brands like ION, Bounce, Grit and Laff, distributed over‑the‑air, on cable/satellite and via connected TV platforms. ^[26]
Is the largest holder of broadcast spectrum in the U.S., a strategic asset in an era of cord‑cutting and wireless data demand. ^[27]
Has rapidly built Scripps Sports into a notable rights player, with properties that today include:
- A multi‑year national deal to air WNBA Friday night games on ION, where average viewership on the “Friday Night Spotlight” package surged triple‑digits year‑over‑year. ^[28]
- Partnerships with the National Women’s Soccer League (NWSL) and multiple NHL teams (including the Florida Panthers and Vegas Golden Knights) for local broadcasts. ^[29]
- A fresh agreement for ION to air the 2026 Major League Volleyball (MLV) championship, adding another women’s sports property to its lineup. ^[30]
- A multi‑year partnership with Sports Illustrated’s new “SI Women’s Games” event, positioning Scripps as a key destination for women’s sports in prime time. ^[31]

Media‑industry analysis today has underscored that these sports rights — especially women’s sports and NHL local packages — are a major part of Scripps’ strategic value, and a big reason Sinclair is interested after exiting most of its regional sports networks in a Chapter 11 process earlier this year. ^[32]

Sinclair’s pitch: big synergies, no new debt — but at what price?

From the details emerging in reports on Sinclair’s SEC filing and follow‑up coverage, a rough picture of the proposed transaction is coming into focus: ^[33]

Synergies: Sinclair estimates more than $300 million in annual cost savings from combining operations, particularly in programming, distribution negotiations, technology and back‑office functions.
Financing: The company says the deal would not require external financing, implying it would rely on its existing balance sheet capacity and Scripps’ cash flows while reducing Scripps’ net debt.
Valuation: Barrett Media and other outlets report that Sinclair is floating a value for Scripps’ shareholders equivalent to about three times the stock’s recent trading price in a combined entity — though there is no binding offer yet and key economic terms remain unclear. ^[34]

So far, Scripps has not publicly endorsed the proposal or confirmed any agreement on valuation. Its response today carefully balanced openness to value‑enhancing options with a firm warning against tactics it views as opportunistic. ^[35]

How today’s drama fits Scripps’ Q3 2025 fundamentals

Less than two weeks ago, Scripps released its third‑quarter 2025 results, offering important context for today’s M&A fireworks. ^[36]

Key numbers and themes from Q3:

Revenue:
- Total revenue was $526 million, down about 19% year‑over‑year, largely due to the absence of last year’s heavy election‑year political advertising.
Profitability:
- Scripps reported a net loss attributable to shareholders of $49 million (‑$0.55 per share) versus a profit in the prior‑year quarter, as higher interest costs and refinancing charges weighed on results.
Segment performance:
- Local Media: Revenue fell 27% to roughly $325 million, primarily because political ad sales dropped from about $125 million to just over $5 million versus the 2024 election cycle. Core advertising, however, grew about 2%, helped by sports partnerships and national ad demand. ^[37]
- Scripps Networks: Revenue was essentially flat at around $201 million, but expenses fell 7.5%, lifting margins to roughly 27% as the company leaned into connected TV growth and cost controls. ^[38]
Sports and growth initiatives:
- Scripps highlighted the WNBA season on ION as a major success, with combined linear and CTV revenue growing 92% year‑over‑year and sports upfront volume up 30%, demonstrating advertiser appetite for women’s sports. ^[39]
Debt and leverage:
- Scripps ended Q3 with $2.7 billion in total debt and net leverage of 4.6x, down from 4.9x earlier in the year after refinancing and selected station sales (WFTX in Fort Myers and WRTV in Indianapolis, totaling about $123 million in proceeds). ^[40]

For Sinclair, a company seeking scale and improved economics after its own restructurings, Scripps’ combination of high leverage, high‑value assets and improving operational metrics may make it an attractive — if complex — target.

Regulatory and competitive hurdles: the FCC looms large

Even if both parties eventually agree on terms, a Sinclair–Scripps tie‑up would face intense regulatory scrutiny.

Analysts and industry outlets note that: ^[41]

The combined footprint would control local TV stations reaching well above the current FCC national audience cap of 39% of U.S. TV households, giving regulators significant say over any merger structure.
There has been speculation that the FCC could revisit or loosen these ownership limits as early as 2026, particularly as Nexstar pursues its own major takeover of Tegna, but no concrete rule changes have been finalized. ^[42]
Any deal would likely require station divestitures, waivers or changes in media‑ownership rules, and could take many months to review.

At the same time, proponents of consolidation argue that larger station groups can spread programming costs, invest in news and local sports, and negotiate more effectively with distributors and advertisers — themes Sinclair is leaning on in its public messaging. ^[43]

What investors and industry watchers should watch next

While there is still a long road between today’s stake disclosure and any finalized merger, several near‑term catalysts are already on the calendar:

Scripps’ investor appearances
- Executives are scheduled to outline business strategy at several investor conferences in November and December 2025, including the Wells Fargo TMT Summit and Bank of America Securities Leveraged Finance Conference. ^[44]
- These events will be closely watched for management’s tone on Sinclair’s approach and any hints about strategic alternatives.
Further Sinclair disclosures
- Follow‑on SEC filings may reveal updated stake levels, proposed deal structures or communication with Scripps’ board. ^[45]
Regulatory signals
- Comments from FCC commissioners and key lawmakers on local TV ownership caps and media consolidation could move expectations for whether a Sinclair–Scripps deal is even feasible at scale. ^[46]
Trading and activism in SSP
- With SSP now firmly on the M&A radar, activist investors or arbitrage funds may build positions, adding volatility and potentially increasing pressure on the Scripps board to negotiate or run a broader process.
Performance of Scripps’ sports portfolio
- As women’s sports viewership and rights values climb, Scripps’ ability to monetize WNBA, NWSL, MLV and other properties will be a critical input to any valuation debate. ^[47]

Bottom line

For November 17, 2025, every major headline around The E.W. Scripps Company (SSP) revolves around Sinclair’s newly disclosed 8.2% stake and its push for a takeover. That single development touches nearly every theme shaping today’s media landscape:

The hunt for scale in local TV,
The surging value of women’s sports rights,
The tug‑of‑war between leveraged balance sheets and strategic optionality, and
The uncertain path of FCC media‑ownership rules.

Whether this story ends in a friendly merger, a hostile campaign, a competing bid or a stand‑alone Scripps that extracts concessions from an eager buyer, it’s clear that SSP just moved onto center stage for investors and media insiders alike.

Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, a recommendation to buy or sell any security, or a solicitation of any kind. Always conduct your own research or consult a licensed financial professional before making investment decisions.

Sinclair Eyes E.W. Scripps Deal: Local TV Consolidation Heats Up!