Apple Watch Series 11: The Next-Gen Smartwatch Poised to Shake Up 2025

Launch imminent (September 2025): Apple is set to unveil the Watch Series 11 at its “Awe Dropping” event on September 9, 2025, with pre-orders expected September 12 and an official release around September 19 ^[1].
Refined design, brighter display: Don’t expect a radical redesign – Series 11 keeps the sleek Series 10 look (42mm/46mm case sizes) but adds a new display that’s even brighter, alongside fresh color options to address past paint issues ^[2] ^[3].
Modest hardware upgrades: Rumored internals include an S11 chip (similar CPU as Series 10, so minimal speed boost) and a new MediaTek modem enabling 5G RedCap connectivity for faster, more efficient data on the watch ^[4] ^[5]. Battery life is still rated ~18 hours “all-day,” though any efficiency gains could slightly extend real-world use.
New health features: The headline upgrade could be blood pressure monitoring – a first for Apple Watch. It likely won’t give exact BP readings but will detect hypertension trends and alert users to possible high blood pressure over time ^[6]. Apple’s latest watchOS 26 software also adds wellness tools like a sleep quality “score” and an AI-powered health coach, aiming to turn your data into actionable insights ^[7] ^[8].
Pricing & models: Pricing is expected to mirror last year – around $399 (USD) for the base 42mm aluminum GPS model (46mm slightly more), plus ~$100 extra for cellular versions ^[9]. Premium titanium-case editions (successor to Series 10’s titanium models) will cost more (estimated $699–$799), and an updated Apple Watch Ultra 3 is likely launching alongside at ~$799 ^[10].
Fierce competition: Series 11 enters a crowded market. Rival flagships like Samsung’s Galaxy Watch and Google’s Pixel Watch now offer advanced health tracking, multi-day battery life, and robust app ecosystems on Android. Fitness-focused wearables from Garmin and Fitbit provide week-long battery endurance and specialized tracking at various price points. We break down how Apple’s latest stacks up on performance, health features, design, ecosystem, and value below.

Overview – What’s New (and What’s Not) in Series 11

Apple Watch Series 10’s design carries over to Series 11, meaning the same big edge-to-edge display and sleek profile.Apple Watch Series 11 is expected to look almost identical to its predecessor, with Apple forgoing any major external redesign this year ^[11]. The Series 10 (shown above) already introduced a thinner case (~10% slimmer) and larger screens (jumping to 42mm and 46mm sizes from the prior 41mm/45mm) ^[12] ^[13]. The Series 11 will maintain this form – Apple internally viewed last year’s model as a “complete redesign,” so this year’s watch refines that foundation rather than reinventing it ^[14]. The notable physical change is a new display panel with higher maximum brightness for better outdoor visibility ^[15]. Apple is also reportedly shuffling the color palette and band options, after issues with the Jet Black finish chipping on Series 10 – expect new finishes that are more durable ^[16]. In short, the Series 11 will look familiar, but shine a bit brighter (literally) and offer refreshed style choices.

Under the hood, the upgrades are incremental but meaningful. Apple will introduce a new S11 System-in-Package (SiP) chipset, though it’s “not expected to be a huge leap” over the S10 ^[17]. In fact, leaked info suggests the S11 uses the same processor architecture as the S9/S10 chips, so performance gains will be modest at best ^[18]. The benefit of the S11 may be efficiency and space: the chip is smaller, potentially freeing up room for other components or a slightly larger battery ^[19]. This means everyday speed on the Watch likely stays about the same – which is to say, already smooth for notifications, fitness tracking, and apps – but with hopes of a bit more battery life or new background capabilities. Apple is also upgrading the communications module: Series 11 is rumored to feature a MediaTek modem with 5G RedCap support ^[20]. RedCap (“reduced capability”) is a new low-power 5G standard for wearables, which should give the watch faster data than its current LTE connection without the battery drain of full 5G ^[21]. In practical terms, cellular models of Apple Watch 11 could sync data and load content snappier when away from your phone, all while maintaining or improving battery life. Notably, this would be Apple’s first move beyond 4G LTE in the Watch line ^[22].

When it comes to health sensors, Apple is playing catch-up and leapfrog at the same time. The Series 11 is expected to introduce blood pressure monitoring, marking a significant expansion of Apple’s health toolkit ^[23]. Don’t throw away your cuff just yet, though – reports say the watch won’t provide on-demand systolic/diastolic readings like a traditional monitor ^[24]. Instead, it will use sensor data (likely from subtle pressure changes or pulse transit time measurements) to detect hypertension trends. In essence, the watch might alert you if your blood pressure appears consistently elevated over days or weeks, prompting you to seek a medical check or use a dedicated device ^[25]. This approach is similar to how Apple handles heart health: much like the Watch can flag irregular heart rhythms suggestive of atrial fibrillation, the new feature would warn of potential hypertension without claiming to diagnose it. “It won’t provide exact systolic and diastolic numbers, but will monitor for hypertension and send an alert if detected over time,” explains MacRumors ^[26]. Such early-warning detection could be a lifesaver given that chronic high blood pressure often has no obvious symptoms yet is a leading risk factor for heart disease and stroke. Notably, Apple’s sources indicate the full feature might not be ready at launch – even Mark Gurman, a typically reliable Apple watcher, is skeptical that blood pressure alerts will be enabled in the Series 11 right away ^[27]. It’s possible Apple will mention the capability as “coming soon” or via a software update later once validated.

Beyond blood pressure, no other brand-new sensors are expected this year ^[28]. The Watch already packs an ECG electrocardiogram, optical heart rate, blood oxygen (SpO₂), skin temperature for cycle tracking, and more. Game-changing features like non-invasive blood glucose monitoring remain in R&D – Apple is indeed working on glucose tracking, but it’s still “many years away” from market readiness ^[29]. (Analysts predict we might not see that until the Apple Watch 12 or later in the coming years.) There were also wild rumors about a built-in camera on the watch, but those are highly speculative for future models at best ^[30]. In short, the Series 11’s hardware advances are focused on connectivity and refining existing tech, with most revolutionary health sensors still on the horizon.

watchOS 26: Smarter Coaching and Better Sleep Tracking

Hand-in-hand with the new hardware, Apple’s latest watchOS 26 software (set to debut on the Series 11) brings an array of new features – many centered on health, fitness, and making sense of your data. One of the most anticipated updates is a revamped Health app with AI coaching, internally code-named “Project Mulberry.” According to Bloomberg’s Mark Gurman, Apple has been working on an AI-powered virtual coach that lives on your devices ^[31]. The idea is that your Apple Watch and iPhone will not only collect fitness and wellness data, but actively analyze and advise you. For example, the watchOS 26 Workout Buddy feature can act like a personal trainer on your wrist – during workouts it may offer real-time tips, encouragement, or adjustments based on your heart rate and performance ^[32]. Apple is also reportedly planning an upgraded subscription service called Health+ with an “AI health agent” in 2024 ^[33], but for now it looks like many coaching features will be available to all users via the built-in app. “The potential update I’m most excited about is the revamped Health app,” said Tom’s Guide fitness editor Jane McGuire, emphasizing that actionable insights and an AI coach could make the Watch an even more powerful wellness companion ^[34].

Sleep tracking is another area getting a boost. Apple Watch has tracked sleep duration and stages for a few years, but it hasn’t provided a simple score or summary of sleep quality like many rivals do. That’s changing in watchOS 26: code in the iOS 17 beta revealed a new Sleep Score (dubbed “Watch Focus Score”) likely to debut with Series 11 ^[35]. This feature will distill your nightly data – time spent awake vs. in REM, deep, and light sleep – into an easy-to-understand number or graphic. A leaked graphic shows an example score of 84 surrounded by colored bars representing different sleep stages ^[36]. As MacRumors notes, Apple appears to have “finally listened” to critiques on this front, realizing that tons of raw data need context ^[37] ^[38]. Even a simple 0–100 score (paired with trend insights) can help users quickly gauge how restorative their sleep was and spot patterns over time. Of course, Apple’s implementation will likely avoid making any health judgments purely from one number – but it brings the Watch in line with Fitbit, Samsung, and Garmin, all of which have offered sleep scores or ratings for years.

Other notable software tweaks include a new “Wrist flick” gesture to dismiss notifications with a quick flick of your wrist ^[39] – a handy trick to navigate alerts more fluidly without the other hand. Apple is also continuing to push more independence for the Watch: improvements to Siri on watchOS now allow more queries to be handled on-device without internet, and the Series 11’s S11 chip will support that trend of speedier, phone-free Siri processing ^[40]. Additionally, watchOS 26 brings quality-of-life upgrades like redesigned widgets (Smart Stack) and expanded cycling workout metrics, as seen in the beta ^[41] ^[42]. All told, the Series 11’s value will be as much about new software experience as the hardware. Apple is clearly positioning the Watch as a proactive health and fitness coach – not just a passive tracker – which could be a key differentiator as smartwatches increasingly focus on wellness.

Release Date, Pricing, and Availability

Apple’s launch timing for Watch Series 11 is September 2025, in line with its annual refresh cycle. The company scheduled its fall product event (cheekily named “Awe Dropping”) for September 9, 2025, where the Watch 11 will be revealed alongside the iPhone 17 lineup ^[43]. If Apple follows precedent, pre-orders should open that same week (likely Friday, Sept. 12) and the first units will ship out by September 19, 2025 ^[44]. Apple typically makes new watches available in its primary markets (North America, UK, Europe, Australia, etc.) on launch day, with other regions rolling out in the weeks after. So by late September, Series 11 should start appearing on wrists around the world.

In terms of pricing, Apple isn’t expected to rock the boat. All rumors point to price tiers remaining unchanged from last year’s Series 10 ^[45]. In the US, that means a starting price of about $399 for the base aluminum model (42mm size, GPS-only) ^[46]. The larger 46mm aluminum is usually around $30–$50 more. Choosing the LTE-enabled version (for phone-independent cellular connectivity) adds roughly $100 on top of the GPS price ^[47]. For instance, Series 10 launched at $399 for 41mm GPS and $499 for the GPS + Cellular; expect Series 11’s 42mm/46mm models to be in the same ballpark. Apple also offers premium case materials – last year the stainless steel option was replaced by a titanium case for higher-end configurations ^[48]. That continues with Series 11: the titanium editions (which come in finishes like natural titanium, black, or gold tint) will likely start around the $699 mark (and go up depending on band selection) ^[49]. These premium models include cellular by default and use sapphire crystal displays, catering to those who want a more luxe look or durability akin to the Apple Watch Ultra. Speaking of the Apple Watch Ultra 3, Apple’s top-of-the-line rugged watch is expected to launch alongside Series 11. The new Ultra (third generation) isn’t the focus of this report, but it’s rumored to gain a larger screen and possibly satellite messaging capability for emergencies ^[50] ^[51]. The Ultra 3 will likely be priced around $799 (the same as the last Ultra) ^[52], positioning it at the high end for enthusiasts and adventurers.

For most buyers, though, the standard Apple Watch Series 11 will be the main choice, with configurations spanning a wide price range. To summarize: budget ~$400 for the entry model, $500-$600 for cellular or larger models, and $700+ if opting for titanium or fancy designer bands. Keep an eye out for Apple’s regional pricing and any import tariffs – for example, UK prices often start around £399, and in Europe around €429, for the base versions (plus VAT). Early indications suggest no major price hikes this year, but external factors (like component costs or tariffs) could lead to small adjustments in certain countries ^[53]. Overall, Apple appears confident that holding the line on pricing, while adding new health capabilities, will entice upgraders without sticker shock.

How Does Series 11 Stack Up Against the Competition?

The smartwatch arena in 2025 is more competitive than ever. Apple may be the market leader, but rivals are closing the gap with compelling offerings of their own. Below we compare the Apple Watch Series 11 to its major competitors – Samsung’s Galaxy Watch series, Google’s Pixel Watch, plus popular fitness-centric wearables from Garmin and Fitbit – across key factors like performance, health tracking, design, ecosystem, and price.

Apple Watch Series 11 vs. Samsung Galaxy Watch (Galaxy Watch 8)

Samsung remains Apple’s fiercest competitor in the smartwatch space, especially for users in the Android ecosystem. The latest flagship, Samsung Galaxy Watch 8, shows how the gap is narrowing in many areas. In terms of performance and software, Samsung made a bold move by integrating Google’s new “Gemini” AI assistant into the Watch 8 – delivering a genuinely smart on-wrist assistant that can handle complex voice queries with ease ^[54] ^[55]. This is a notable advantage over Apple’s Siri, which, while improved, isn’t yet as conversationally powerful as the AI Samsung is leveraging. The Galaxy Watch 8 also runs Wear OS (Android-based) with Samsung’s One UI Watch interface. This means it has access to a rich app ecosystem (Google Play Store for wearables) and tight integration with Google services, much like Apple Watch integrates with Apple’s services. However, it’s worth noting that some of Samsung’s best features are gated to its own ecosystem: for example, the Galaxy Watch’s built-in ECG and blood pressure apps require a Samsung Galaxy phone to work due to how Samsung Health handles approvals ^[56] ^[57]. (Samsung has offered blood pressure on its watches since 2020, but you must calibrate with a cuff and the feature isn’t FDA-approved in the US yet.) By contrast, Apple Watch’s ECG works with any iPhone and is FDA-cleared – but Apple lacks any blood pressure tool until the Series 11’s hypertension alerts arrive.

In health and fitness tracking, both watches cover the basics thoroughly: 24/7 heart rate monitoring, ECG, blood oxygen, sleep tracking, and workout detection. Samsung even added a skin-temperature sensor (for cycle tracking and wellness insights) similar to Apple’s, and it uniquely offers a body composition scanner (BIA) to estimate body fat percentage – something Apple Watch doesn’t do. On the flip side, Apple’s Health app and Fitness+ platform provide a very comprehensive wellness experience for iOS users, and with watchOS 26 Apple is adding features like sleep apnea detection and advanced cycling metrics that Samsung is still catching up on ^[58] ^[59]. Both brands are pushing into advanced metrics (Samsung introduced things like “Vascular load” and other new fitness stats, though some feel half-baked ^[60]). An area Samsung hasn’t solved yet is battery life. The Galaxy Watch 8 still only manages about 1.5 days on a charge (for the 40mm model tested) – “daily charging is still necessary,” according to Wareable’s review ^[61] ^[62]. That’s only a slight edge over Apple’s ~18-24 hour typical span, meaning both watches are essentially charge-every-night devices for most users. Neither can touch the multi-day longevity of some fitness watches (more on that below). Samsung does offer a Watch 8 Classic variant with a physical rotating bezel and typically slightly larger battery, but even that isn’t a multi-day champ if you use always-on display.

Design-wise, the Apple Watch and Galaxy Watch take divergent approaches: Apple’s squarish-retangular design (with its iconic rounded corners and Digital Crown) versus Samsung’s round watch face that resembles a traditional timepiece. Preference here is personal. Apple’s large edge-to-edge Retina OLED display is brilliant and now even brighter on Series 11, but Samsung’s Super AMOLED circular display is equally vibrant and arguably more watch-like. The Galaxy Watch 8’s new “cushion” case design (borrowed from its Ultra model) gives it a refined, modern look that sits comfortably on the wrist ^[63] ^[64]. Materials differ: Apple uses aluminum or titanium, whereas Samsung offers aluminum for the standard Watch 8 and stainless steel in the Classic model. Both come in two sizes (Apple 42/46mm vs Samsung 40/44mm, plus the Classic at 46mm). One design advantage in Samsung’s favor: the Galaxy Watch 8 Classic resurrects the fan-favorite rotating bezel ring for tactile control, which many users adore for scrolling without touching the screen – Apple relies on its side crown and touch only.

Ecosystem and compatibility may be the biggest separator. Apple Watch, famously, only works with iPhone. If you’re in Apple’s world, it’s seamless – your Watch unlocks your Mac, pings your iPhone, syncs with iCloud, etc., and you have the expansive Apple App Store for Watch. But if you ever leave iPhones, the Apple Watch won’t pair with an Android phone at all. Samsung’s watches, running Wear OS, are Android-only (and best experienced with Samsung phones, though they do work with any modern Android). So for an Android user, Apple Watch isn’t even an option; and for an iPhone user, a Galaxy Watch would technically not be compatible either (older Samsung Tizen-based watches had limited iOS support, but the current Wear OS models do not support iOS). Thus, the choice is largely dictated by your phone. Within that context, Apple Watch is still considered the gold standard for iPhone owners – “the best smartwatch for most people”, as Wareable crowned the Series 10 ^[65] – whereas for Android users, the Galaxy Watch 8 is among the top picks alongside Google’s Pixel Watch. Samsung also competes aggressively on price: Galaxy Watch models often start around $279-$329 for Bluetooth versions, undercutting Apple a bit, and they frequently go on sale. If you own a Samsung phone and care about features like the blood pressure app or deep integration with SmartThings, the Galaxy Watch is a no-brainer. But if we compare pure capabilities: the Apple Watch Series 11 and Galaxy Watch 8 trade punches in health features (each has a couple the other lacks), both have bright OLED displays and rich app ecosystems, and both still require daily (or near-daily) charging. Samsung has leveled up its game with things like the AI assistant and sleek design, making the Galaxy Watch 8 “a resounding success” and its best smartwatch in years ^[66] ^[67] – especially for those already in the Galaxy universe. Apple Watch, however, continues to benefit from Apple’s tight hardware-software integration and the vast developer support of the Apple platform (e.g. exclusive apps, Fitness+, etc.), maintaining an edge for iPhone users who want the most cohesive experience.

Apple Watch Series 11 vs. Google Pixel Watch

Google’s Pixel Watch is a newer entrant (launched in 2022) but has quickly become a strong contender in the smartwatch market for Android users. The upcoming Pixel Watch 4 is on the horizon (expected October 2025), but for comparison we’ll consider the Pixel Watch 3 – the current model which has established Google’s foothold in wearables. The Apple Watch Series 11 and Pixel Watch share some similarities: both are tightly integrated with their respective phone platforms (iOS for Apple Watch, Android for Pixel Watch), and both emphasize health tracking and sleek design. However, there are key differences.

Design and hardware: The Pixel Watch 3 has a distinctive round face with a domed, almost bezel-less glass design. It’s elegant and compact – and with the Pixel Watch 3, Google introduced a second size (45mm) in addition to the original smaller 41mm ^[68]. The larger model was a response to feedback, and it not only fits larger wrists but also packs a bigger battery. By contrast, Apple Watch Series 11 sticks with the square-ish display and comes in 42mm and 46mm sizes, both of which likely have larger screen area than the Pixel’s circular 45mm (since square displays yield more area than round for the same diameter). Apple’s advantage is in screen real estate and the new ultra-bright display, whereas Pixel’s advantage is a truly minimalist, jewel-like form that some prefer for style. In materials, Apple offers aluminum and titanium, whereas Pixel Watch is stainless steel (for the case) with strong Gorilla Glass on top. Both feel premium; Apple’s larger sizes might look chunkier, but Google’s first-gen Pixel was praised for its comfortable build too.

Performance: Apple’s S-series chips historically have given Apple Watch a speed and smoothness lead. The Series 11’s S11 chip, while not a huge leap, is likely still very capable for fluid animations and app launches. The Pixel Watch 3 uses a Qualcomm-based chipset (in Pixel Watch 2 it was the Snapdragon W5, and Pixel 3 might use a refined version or Samsung Exynos), and Google has optimized Wear OS to run well. Pixel Watch 3 in everyday use is smooth, and importantly it made a breakthrough in battery life. Thanks to the larger 45mm variant, Pixel Watch 3 can achieve over 48 hours (two days) with always-on display enabled – and up to 3-4 days if you turn off always-on and use battery saver features ^[69] ^[70]. This is a big deal: as Wareable noted, the 45mm Pixel Watch “consistently lasted over 48 hours with the always-on display enabled” and became their top recommendation for Android users largely for this reason ^[71] ^[72]. The smaller 41mm Pixel still only gets about a day (closer to Apple’s range), but Google giving an option for multi-day endurance is a win. Apple Watch Series 11, by comparison, is still essentially a one-day device (barring light use and turning off features). So if battery longevity is a priority, Pixel Watch (large) clearly outshines Apple’s offering.

Health and tracking: When Google launched the Pixel Watch, it leveraged its acquisition of Fitbit to bolster health features. The Pixel Watch 3 runs Wear OS 4 with deep Fitbit integration – essentially, Fitbit’s health tracking algorithms and apps power the Pixel’s wellness features. Users get Fitbit’s excellent sleep analysis, step tracking, and the Daily Readiness Score (which on Pixel Watch 3 was made available to all users without requiring a subscription) ^[73]. It also offers ECG (the Pixel Watch has an ECG app just like Apple’s), high/low heart rate alerts, and blood oxygen tracking. One area Pixel improved is heart rate accuracy: the Pixel Watch 3’s heart rate sensor is among the best, “among the best we’ve tested” for accuracy, even during workouts ^[74]. This is high praise, putting it on par or even above Apple’s famously good heart rate tracking. Google has also added things like stress tracking (though reviewers find it less useful) and continues to expand its health suite, including menstrual cycle tracking and skin temperature on Pixel Watch 2/3. Apple Watch matches or exceeds in some areas – for instance, Apple introduced sleep apnea detection and medications tracking in its Health app, which Google/Fitbit haven’t explicitly done yet. Apple’s upcoming AI coaching could leapfrog what Pixel offers by default (Fitbit offers some coaching and insights but often tied to Fitbit Premium service). Also, Apple’s new blood pressure alert (if it rolls out) would be something Pixel Watch does not have. On the other hand, Google is now adding irregular heart rhythm notifications for AFib (similar to Apple’s) and has the advantage of decades of Fitbit data to back its metrics.

Ecosystem: This one is straightforward – Apple Watch is for iPhone, Pixel Watch is for Android. The Pixel Watch works with any Android phone (not just Google’s Pixel phones), and it’s arguably the best smartwatch choice for Android users who want a blend of style and substance. It ties into Google services (Assistant, Maps, Wallet, etc.) just as Apple Watch ties into Siri, Maps, Apple Pay, etc. App selection on Wear OS is decent and improving (popular apps like Spotify, Strava, messaging apps, etc. are available). Apple still has the edge in third-party app support – developers often prioritize Apple Watch given its user base and consistent hardware. But Google’s platform is catching up now that it has unified with Samsung on Wear OS. One thing to note: Pixel Watch does not have a wide range of models – it’s one case style in two sizes, usually one premium price (Pixel Watch 3 launched around $349-$399). Apple offers a broader lineup (SE, standard, Ultra). So Apple caters to a wider audience (including budget via Watch SE). Google’s strategy is more singular: one premium watch to show off the best of Wear OS + Fitbit.

Bottom line: For iPhone users, Pixel Watch isn’t an option, and for Android users, Apple Watch isn’t either – so the competition is indirect. But if we imagine an unbiased playing field: the Series 11 vs Pixel Watch 3 comes down to battery vs breadth. Pixel Watch finally delivered multi-day battery life (on the large model), which addresses one of the biggest pain points in smartwatches ^[75] ^[76]. It also has arguably simpler, more motivating health insights thanks to Fitbit’s DNA (e.g. giving you morning readiness assessments, etc.). Apple Watch Series 11, however, offers a more extensive feature set overall (more apps, more mature smartwatch capabilities like phone-free use with LTE, a tried-and-true hardware design, and extremely tight integration with the iPhone ecosystem). Apple’s new health features (AI coaching, potentially BP alerts) might keep it a step ahead in innovation. As one reviewer put it, the Pixel Watch 3 is “remarkably refined and well-rounded”, especially now that it comes in two sizes and nails the fundamentals ^[77]. It’s the best smartwatch for Android according to many, while Apple Watch remains the best for iOS. Each will “stay in their lane” for now, but it’s clear Google is serious about challenging Apple on fitness and polish. If Apple doesn’t extend battery life or break new ground soon, Pixel (and Samsung) will continue chipping away at the experience gap.

Apple Watch Series 11 vs. Garmin Watches

Apple and Garmin often appeal to different segments, but with the Apple Watch Ultra and increasing fitness features on regular Apple Watches, their worlds are overlapping more. Garmin is known for its dedicated GPS sport watches and exceptional battery endurance, targeting athletes, adventurers, and outdoors enthusiasts. How would the new Apple Watch Series 11 compare to a Garmin?

First, Garmin has a vast lineup – from stylish smartwatches (Venu series), to hardcore multi-sport GPS watches (Forerunner, Fenix, Epix), to even diving and ultra-endurance watches. For a fair comparison, consider a model like the Garmin Venu series (Garmin’s most smartwatch-like family) or the Fenix/Epix (top-tier performance watches). The Garmin Venu X1 (released 2025) is a good example: it’s a “powerful sports watch wrapped in the best-looking, most comfortable smartwatch [Garmin] has ever produced,” according to Wareable ^[78]. It has an ultra-thin titanium design (7.9mm) that rivals or beats Apple’s slim profile, and it’s meant to be worn 24/7 comfortably ^[79] ^[80]. Garmin loaded it with their full suite of advanced training metrics – things like Training Status, Endurance Score, recovery times, VO₂ max, and native turn-by-turn maps for navigation ^[81]. In terms of fitness and sport tracking, Garmin is still king: serious runners, cyclists, and triathletes often prefer Garmin because of those in-depth metrics, more reliable GPS (many Garmin models have dual-band GNSS for higher accuracy), and integration with platforms like Garmin Connect that offer robust analysis. Apple is catching up (it added running dynamics, power metrics, etc., and allows third-party apps like Strava, but Garmin devices are purpose-built for these metrics).

One of Garmin’s hallmark advantages has been battery life. Many Garmin watches last days or even weeks. For example, a Garmin Fenix 7 can go 1-2 weeks on a charge with standard use, and even the AMOLED-screen Epix can manage nearly a week. The Garmin Venu X1, being ultra-thin and AMOLED, sacrificed some of that: it only manages about 2 days with always-on display – which is actually Garmin’s worst battery life among its current lineup ^[82] ^[83]. That’s similar to or slightly better than Apple Watch, but far below Garmin’s usual standards. So interestingly, when Garmin tries to match Apple’s form factor and style (thin, bright screen), it too faces battery constraints. But Garmin gives consumers the choice: if you want an elegant watch, you accept 2-3 day battery, if you want pure endurance, you get a transflective screen Garmin that might last a month in GPS mode using solar charging (as some specialized models do). Apple Watch Series 11, by contrast, doesn’t give you that range of choice – all models have similar battery life (roughly 18-36 hours depending on usage and low-power settings). So if multi-day battery for long expeditions or lack of charging is your priority, Garmin still wins handily with certain models.

Health tracking on Garmin vs Apple has pros and cons. Garmin has been adding health features: most Garmins now have heart rate sensors, SpO₂ sensors, body battery (overall energy) metrics, stress tracking, and women’s health tracking. Higher-end Garmins even introduced an ECG in 2023 on the Venu 2 Plus (with FDA approval for Afib detection). However, the Garmin Venu X1 notably does not have ECG or some newer bells and whistles ^[84], focusing instead on core sports features. Apple Watch Series 11 has ECG, fall detection, irregular heart rhythm notifications, and potentially blood pressure alerts – features some Garmin models lack. Garmin excels at things like training load analysis, recovery time suggestions, and integration with accessories (like chest strap heart monitors, cycling power meters, etc., for the really serious athletes). Apple is improving in training analysis (adding things like personalized coaching in watchOS 26), but it’s still not as comprehensive for, say, marathon training plans or hiking off-grid with topo maps – whereas Garmin devices are purpose-built for those scenarios (many have offline maps, waypoint navigation, etc., which only the Apple Watch Ultra partially addresses with Compass waypoints and emergency SOS).

Smart features and ecosystem: This is where Apple is clearly ahead. The Apple Watch is essentially an extension of your smartphone – it handles calls, texts, has a huge app store, can stream music, use Apple Pay, control smart home devices, etc., very fluidly. Garmin watches have been traditionally more limited “smartwatch lite” experiences. Newer Garmins do support notifications, some have music storage and Spotify offline, Garmin Pay for contactless payments, and even safety features like incident detection. But Garmin’s app ecosystem is small; they use a platform called Connect IQ for some apps/watchfaces, but it’s nowhere near Apple’s. As Wareable succinctly put it, non-Apple/non-Wear OS platforms “don’t have the developer support for many quality apps…you’re limited to basic functionality.” ^[85]. So, if you want Uber on your watch or a vast selection of third-party apps, Apple (or Wear OS) is far ahead. Garmin also usually doesn’t include features like voice assistants or on-wrist calls (some models allow Bluetooth calls with a paired phone, but you don’t get Siri or Google Assistant on a Garmin). The Apple ecosystem integration(unlocking your Mac, using your watch as a camera shutter for your iPhone, etc.) is unmatched.

Price: Garmin watches range widely. Something like the Garmin Venu X1 comes at a premium price (around $600-$800) for the titanium case model, which is on par or higher than an Apple Watch Series 11 titanium or even approaching Apple Watch Ultra range ^[86]. Other Garmin models like a Forerunner 265 might be $449, Fenix 7 $699+, and entry-level Garmins under $300. Apple Watch Series 11 starts ~$399 and climbs to $799 for the Ultra, covering a similar spread. So price isn’t a clear differentiator – it depends on model and features.

In summary, Apple Watch vs Garmin is really a case of smartwatch versus specialized sports watch. Apple Watch Series 11 will give a more polished everyday smart experience and solid all-around fitness tracking. Garmin will give deeper fitness stats and options like multi-week battery life or offline mapping for adventurers, but with a relatively sparse “smart” experience. Notably, Apple’s introduction of the Watch Ultra indicates Apple is eyeing Garmin’s turf (the Ultra’s long battery modes, dual-frequency GPS, and rugged build were aimed at hikers, divers, ultrarunners). Garmin responded by making some watches more smartwatch-like (AMOLED screens, ECG features). There’s convergence, but each still has strengths. As one review of the Garmin Venu X1 noted, it “isn’t a true smartwatch rival to Apple or Samsung” – it’s built for Garmin loyalists who prioritize an elegant design and are willing to trade some smartwatch features (and even battery life, ironically) to get it ^[87]. Apple Watch Series 11 will continue to dominate for iPhone users who want a bit of everything, while Garmin remains the choice for those who need their watch to last a week in the wilderness or offer exhaustive training analytics.

Apple Watch Series 11 vs. Fitbit

Fitbit, now a Google-owned brand, has historically been the household name in fitness trackers and more basic smartwatches. In recent years, Google’s Pixel Watch has somewhat taken over the flagship role from Fitbit, but Fitbit’s Versa and Sense series are still popular, typically at lower price points than Apple’s watches. How does the new Apple Watch compare to Fitbit’s wearables?

Design and hardware: Fitbit’s top smartwatch is the Fitbit Sense 2 (released late 2022) and the Versa 4, which share similar hardware. They are lightweight, squarish watches with AMOLED touchscreens, somewhat analogous to an Apple Watch SE in look. Apple Watch Series 11 is more premium in build (aluminum or titanium vs. Fitbit’s aluminum), and Apple offers larger display sizes with more advanced curved OLED edges. Fitbits tend to have simpler, smaller displays (to conserve battery) and minimal onboard controls (the Sense 2 reintroduced a physical side button but mostly relies on touch). Apple’s design is more refined and the interface more fluid; Fitbits are designed to be straightforward and fuss-free for a mainstream user.

Health and fitness: Fitbit built its reputation on step counting, sleep tracking, and general wellness metrics. The Sense 2 actually has a pretty robust sensor set – it includes continuous ECG (AFib detection), an electrodermal activity (EDA) sensor for stress, skin temperature sensor, SpO₂, and of course heart rate and GPS. It covers a lot of the same health bases as Apple Watch (even blood oxygen and ECG, which the Apple Watch has too). Fitbit’s strengths lie in simplicity and battery life. The typical Fitbit watch can go ~5-6 days on a charge, meaning you can wear it to bed every night and not worry about daily charging ^[88]. This is a huge plus for people who want to track sleep; many Apple Watch users end up charging at night, making it hard to use as a sleep tracker (unless you top-up charge at some other time). Fitbit will remind you maybe once a week to charge, which is far more convenient for some lifestyles. Apple did add a low-power mode and faster charging, but it’s still not in the same league of endurance as Fitbit devices ^[89].

Fitbit’s health platform (within the Fitbit app) emphasizes easy-to-understand metrics like the Sleep Score, Stress Management Score, and the Daily Readiness Score (if you have Fitbit Premium). These scores distill complex data into simple numbers – something Apple is now adopting (as mentioned, adding a sleep score in watchOS). For a long time, Apple provided raw data and graphs while Fitbit gave you a single score; now Apple is moving in that direction of simplification too. Fitbit also has a large social community and challenges, which can be a motivator for some users (e.g., competing with friends on step counts). Apple’s Activity Sharing is similar but the Fitbit community aspect is well-established.

Smart features and apps: This is where Fitbits are far more limited. Fitbits can show notifications and do basics like timers, alarms, and watch faces. The Sense 2 and Versa 4, notably, dropped support for third-party apps that older Fitbits had. So you can’t install, say, Spotify or Starbucks app or any of that on the new Fitbits; you’re basically using built-in functions only. This was a conscious trade-off by Google/Fitbit to simplify and improve performance, but it means Fitbit is not a true smartwatch in the way Apple Watch is. Apple Watch Series 11 will run thousands of apps, let you reply to messages from the watch, stream music, use maps, etc. Fitbit is more of a smart tracker. It does have phone features like call alerts and quick text replies (on Android, not as smoothly on iOS), but it’s nowhere near as feature-rich as an Apple Watch or even a Wear OS watch. If you use an iPhone, you can actually use a Fitbit with it – Fitbit devices are cross-platform (compatible with both iOS and Android). But you won’t get things like using Siri or controlling Apple Home devices from a Fitbit. Meanwhile, Apple Watch tightly integrates with your phone’s apps and services.

Price: Fitbits are generally more affordable. The Sense 2 launched at $299 and often is on sale for ~$229. The Versa is even cheaper. Apple Watch Series 11 starts at $399 and goes up. Apple does have the Watch SE (typically $249 or less) which competes more directly with Fitbit on price, but Series 11 is firmly premium. So, many people who choose Fitbit either do so for the lower cost or the longer battery (or both). Fitbit also offers basic fitness bands (Inspire, Charge) at well under $150 that Apple has no direct answer for – Apple doesn’t play in the budget tracker space.

Accuracy and capability: Fitbit’s tracking is generally good for casual use – steps, general activity, even sleep stages are fairly accurate. However, when it comes to intense workouts or training, Apple Watch tends to have more reliable GPS tracking and can pair with more accessories (Fitbit can’t connect to external heart straps or foot pods, etc., whereas Apple Watch can indirectly via apps). Apple Watch also has more nuanced exercise modes and now things like heart rate zones, interval training features, etc., which Fitbit keeps more basic.

In conclusion, an Apple Watch Series 11 vs Fitbit is a bit of an apples-to-oranges comparison. One is a full-fledged mini-computer on your wrist with broad capabilities; the other is a streamlined health tracker with some smartwatch conveniences. If you value ease of use and battery life, and just want to track fitness and get simple insights, a Fitbit is a great option (and certainly more budget-friendly). You’ll get nearly a week per charge ^[90], and you won’t be overwhelmed by apps or settings. However, you sacrifice the rich interactivity and extensibility of the Apple Watch. If you’re already in the Apple ecosystem and want the best companion for your iPhone that does everything from unlocking your phone to controlling music to running third-party apps – and you don’t mind charging daily – the Apple Watch is in a league of its own. Also, with Google now focusing on Pixel Watch for high-end, the future of Fitbit’s high-end models is a bit uncertain. But for now, Fitbit remains a strong choice for a no-frills, health-focused wearable, whereas Apple Watch Series 11 is targeting a more advanced experience that blends fitness, communication, and smart apps all together.

Expert Opinions and Market Outlook

The Apple Watch Series 11 arrives at a time when the smartwatch market is both maturing and intensifying. On one hand, tech experts note that Apple’s yearly watch upgrades have become more iterative. “No design changes are expected this year,” and overall Series 11 “represents a more modest update” after last year’s big Series 10 redesign ^[91]. This sentiment is echoed by analysts who advise that 2025’s model is an evolution, with the truly “insane” upgrades (like new sensors) possibly coming in next year’s model ^[92]. Indeed, some industry watchers have suggested that customers who don’t need a new watch urgently could consider waiting for a potentially more significant Series 12 in 2026 (rumored to feature things like a new sensor or even a micro-LED display). That said, the Series 11 is far from a trivial release – it introduces Apple’s first step into blood pressure monitoring, and as noted, it doubles down on Apple’s software-driven health initiative. This aligns with Apple’s broader strategy of making the Watch an indispensable health device. “Apple’s single-day battery life remains the Achilles’ heel” of the watch, one review lamented ^[93], yet the company is mitigating that by adding value in health and intelligence. As long-time Apple watcher Jason Snell wrote during the beta, the new features in watchOS (like Smart Stack widgets and Workout Buddy) show Apple “moving towards a more comprehensive set of wellness AI features” on the Watch ^[94]. In other words, Apple is betting that smart features and integration will keep users hooked, even if hardware gains are incremental.

From a market perspective, Apple still commands a huge mindshare in wearables – but the competition is heating up globally. Notably, in Q2 2025, Huawei actually overtook Apple in quarterly smartwatch shipments for the first time, buoyed by a surge in China’s market ^[95]. Counterpoint Research data showed global smartwatch shipments grew 8% after a slump, with Huawei’s volumes jumping over 50% year-on-year while Apple’s declined ~3% ^[96] ^[97]. This resulted in Apple temporarily ceding the top spot in unit sales. However, it’s important to put that in context: Apple still leads the industry in what Counterpoint calls “advanced smartwatches” (i.e., higher-end devices with a robust OS) and enjoys unparalleled loyalty among iPhone users ^[98]. The Series 11 will likely maintain Apple’s momentum in its core markets – millions of existing Apple Watch owners could upgrade, and new iPhone buyers often consider an Apple Watch for the seamless integration.

The public expectation for Series 11 can be described as cautiously optimistic. Enthusiasts on forums express excitement for features like the blood pressure alerts and brighter display, but there’s also a refrain that this is a “S year” for Apple Watch – meaning a smaller year-over-year improvement, analogous to the “tick-tock” cycle Apple used to have with iPhones. Many are happy to see Apple focusing on refinement and reliability. For instance, fixing the paint chipping issue on the Jet Black finish and offering new color/band styles seems minor, but it responds to real user feedback ^[99]. Likewise, the move to a more efficient 5G-ready modem shows Apple future-proofing the Watch’s connectivity. Some power users are disappointed there’s no boost to battery life or a new sensor like glucose or hydration tracking this round, but even they acknowledge that the “hidden features” or surprises in Apple’s announcement could sway opinions ^[100]. Apple often holds back some software demos for the stage – e.g., perhaps a cool new watch face or an unexpected partnership (fitness or medical) could be revealed, which aren’t known via leaks.

Analysts point out that Apple is playing the long game with health features. Each new sensor or metric Apple adds typically comes with regulatory and validation hurdles. The Series 11’s hypertension monitoring needed years of development and likely still won’t be marketed as a medical feature until thoroughly tested. But Apple’s method of adding these capabilities (starting as wellness indicators, then possibly seeking approvals) could significantly broaden the Watch’s healthcare impact. We’ve seen how the Watch’s ECG and atrial fibrillation alerts have literally saved lives by notifying users of heart issues early. The hope is that hypertension alerts might do the same for people who are unaware of developing high blood pressure.

In terms of potential market impact, the Apple Watch Series 11 is poised to solidify Apple’s lead in the premium smartwatch segment, but maybe not dramatically expand it. The incremental nature of the update means it may not spark a massive upgrade super-cycle; many Series 8 or 9 owners might hold off for a more compelling jump. However, first-time smartwatch buyers or those with much older models (Series 5, 6, etc.) could be drawn in by the cumulative improvements. Apple’s strategy of offering the Watch SE (for entry level) and Watch Ultra (for high end) alongside Series 11 ensures they target multiple segments. The Series 11 sits in the middle as the mainstream choice. With competitors like Samsung and Google making strides, Apple’s big advantage remains its ecosystem lock-in – iPhone users have little reason to stray to another brand, and indeed the ecosystem keeps growing (Apple Fitness+, Apple Pay, Apple Health integration with providers, etc.). We might see Apple doubling down on those services to add value to the Watch. There’s talk of Apple’s upcoming Health+ subscription service with AI coaching ^[101], which could become an additional revenue stream and give people more reason to use an Apple Watch versus a competitor.

One clear trend: smartwatches are becoming health devices first. As a CNBC tech analyst recently quipped, “The smartwatch has turned from a luxury gadget into a must-have health monitor.” Apple’s marketing for Series 11 will almost certainly focus on how it can keep you healthy, safe, and connected. Features like Crash Detection and Emergency SOS (present in recent models) already highlight life-saving potentials. Series 11’s blood pressure and AI health coaching push that narrative further. This health-centric approach differentiates Apple Watch from some competitors that emphasize style or general smart features. It also positions Apple strongly as populations age and healthcare monitoring becomes more prevalent.

In summary, expert reviewers are keen to try the Apple Watch Series 11’s new tricks, even if they aren’t radical redesigns. “The Series 11 probably won’t see major changes,” an analysis in Indian Express concluded, but it will refine an already winning formula ^[102]. The public’s wish list (longer battery, new form factors) might be largely deferred to future models, yet Apple consistently manages to top customer satisfaction charts in this category. As long as Series 11 delivers on its promises of small but meaningful improvements – a brighter screen here, a new health alert there, a snappier modem – it will further cement Apple’s position. The competition is catching up feature-by-feature, but the seamless experience of Apple Watch with an iPhone remains a strong moat. And with global smartwatch adoption still growing (projected to double in the next decade ^[103]), Apple has ample room to expand its user base. Even in markets like China, where Huawei surged, Apple’s brand and ecosystem could regain ground with the right moves.

Ultimately, the Apple Watch Series 11 looks to be an evolution that keeps Apple on top of the smartwatch game, if not a revolution. It caters to what users have come to expect from an Apple Watch: a premium, polished device that integrates into daily life and increasingly, looks after your well-being. As one tech reviewer succinctly put it, “In terms of devices available today, we rank the Apple Watch as the best smartwatch for most people.” ^[104] Series 11 appears poised to uphold that crown – with just a bit more polish and a few new tricks up its sleeve (or rather, on your wrist).

Sources: MacRumors ^[105] ^[106] ^[107] ^[108]; Tech Advisor ^[109] ^[110]; Tom’s Guide ^[111] ^[112]; Wareable ^[113] ^[114] ^[115]; Indian Express ^[116]; Apple World Today ^[117] ^[118]; Counterpoint Research via AppleWorldToday ^[119]; Bloomberg via MacRumors ^[120]; Mark Gurman (Bloomberg) via AppleWorldToday ^[121]; Jane McGuire, Tom’s Guide ^[122]; Conor Allison, Wareable ^[123] ^[124]; and other industry analyses.