Key Facts
- Blood Moon dazzles billions: A rare total lunar eclipse (“Blood Moon”) on Sept 7–8 painted the Moon red for 82 minutes, visible to ~85% of the world [1].
- AI threatens human rights: A new AI ethics study warns unchecked AI could undermine privacy and dignity, calling the technology “not intelligent in any human sense” and urging global regulation [2] [3].
- Allergy spray cuts COVID by 67%: A clinical trial found an over-the-counter hay fever nasal spray (azelastine) reduced COVID-19 infections by about two-thirds compared to placebo [4] [5].
- Autism symptoms reversed in mice:Stanford scientists pinpointed a brain “gatekeeper” region in mice driving autism-like behaviors and reversed these symptoms using experimental seizure drugs, suggesting new treatment paths [6] [7].
- Visible “time crystal” created: Physicists made the first time crystal visible to the naked eye – liquid crystals that self-arrange into endlessly looping patterns – opening potential tech applications from anti-counterfeiting to novel data storage [8] [9].
- CRISPR gene editing supercharged:Northwestern chemists developed DNA-coated nanoballs that deliver CRISPR into cells 3× more effectively, tripling gene-editing success and cutting toxicity – a leap for genetic medicine [10] [11].
- “Rogue wave” mystery solved: An 18-year ocean study finds monster rogue waves arise when normal wave patterns align and amplify – no exotic forces needed – enabling efforts to predict these 80-foot “freak” waves for ship safety [12] [13].
- Ocean lifeline falters in Panama: For the first time in 40+ years, Panama’s seasonal Pacific upwelling of cold, nutrient-rich waters failed to occur, a disruption linked to weakened winds and climate anomalies that threatens fisheries and reefs [14] [15].
Space & Astronomy: Blood Moon Eclipse Wows the World
A spectacular celestial event captivated skywatchers on the night of September 7–8, 2025: a total lunar eclipse turned the full Moon a deep coppery red for about 82 minutes [16]. Dubbed a “Blood Moon,” the eclipse occurred as Earth’s shadow completely blanketed the Moon. Unusually, this eclipse was widely visible across Europe, Africa, and Asia – an estimated 85% of the global population had a chance to witness at least part of it [17]. Observers from India to Australia marveled as Earth’s atmosphere refracted red light onto the Moon, creating an eerie crimson orb. The event marked 2025’s second total lunar eclipse, following one in March [18]. Its extensive visibility and long duration made it a memorable spectacle for billions around the world. While North America missed out this time, astronomers noted that the next total lunar eclipse will occur in March 2026, giving other regions a front-row seat to the Blood Moon phenomenon [19]. Such lunar eclipses pose no harm – unlike solar eclipses – and offer scientists opportunities to study Earth’s atmosphere (which imparts the red hue) and to engage the public in astronomy. Overall, the weekend’s Blood Moon was both a scientific and cultural highlight, blending orbital mechanics with human awe as people worldwide looked up in wonder at the glowing red Moon.
Climate & Earth Science: From “Freak” Waves to Failing Currents
Unpredictable killer waves in the ocean may not be so mysterious after all. New research led by Georgia Tech finally cracked the physics behind rogue waves, the massive 20–30 meter walls of water once dismissed as maritime myth. By analyzing 27,000+ wave recordings over 18 years in the North Sea, scientists found these “monsters” arise when ordinary wave dynamics coincide in rare extremes [20]. Two familiar effects – linear focusing (waves converging in sync) and nonlinear wave stretching – can align to make a single wave tower far above the rest [21]. Notably, the team found no evidence that exotic phenomena (like hypothetical “walls of water” out of nowhere) are needed [22]. “Rogue waves follow the natural orders of the ocean – not exceptions to them. This is the most definitive, real-world evidence to date,” said lead author Dr. Francesco Fedele [23]. In other words, these events are extreme but explainable. This insight carries real urgency: rogue waves pose lethal threats to ships and oil platforms. Many models still treat them as unpredictable flukes, but Fedele argues “they’re extreme, but they’re explainable” [24]. His findings are already informing forecasting tools; agencies like NOAA and even offshore industries (e.g. Chevron) have begun using the new wave models to anticipate dangerous seas [25]. By recognizing rogue waves as a “bad day at sea” rather than supernatural anomalies, scientists aim to improve early warning systems and design vessels that withstand these oceanic giants [26].
Meanwhile, a concerning climate anomaly unfolded in tropical waters. For the first time in at least four decades, the Pacific upwelling current off Panama failed to occur this year [27] [28]. Typically each dry season, steady trade winds drive cold, nutrient-rich deep water to the surface along Panama’s Pacific coast – a natural “ocean lifeline” that boosts fisheries and cools reefs [29] [30]. But in early 2025, oceanographers recorded an unprecedented dud: the usual upwelling never arrived [31]. Sea surface temperatures stayed warmer and nutrient levels lower, stressing marine life. Researchers at the Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute blame a significant drop in the regional wind patterns, likely linked to global climate disruption [32] [33]. “This raises questions about how climate change is affecting ocean processes that coastal communities have relied on for millennia,” said STRI marine scientist Dr. Matthew C. Miller [34]. Losing this seasonal cold surge could hit Panama’s coral reefs and fisheries hard, as it removes a source of relief from heat and a driver of plankton blooms [35] [36]. STRI oceanographer Carlos Rodríguez called the upwelling failure “a wake-up call”, noting “we urgently need better monitoring and predictive systems to understand how the tropics are responding to global climate disruption” [37]. The event underscores the vulnerability of tropical ocean systems as climate patterns shift. Researchers are now watching whether this is a one-off anomaly (perhaps due to the strong El Niño developing in 2025) or a sign of long-term climate trends. Either way, the first missing upwelling in 40+ years has alerted scientists and local communities to the rapid changes underway in Earth’s environment [38] [39].
Life Sciences & Evolution: Flamingo Aging and Jurassic Clues
In the realm of biology, a 40-year study of wild flamingos is shedding light on the mysteries of aging. Scientists tracking 1,800+ greater flamingos in the Camargue region of France discovered a striking difference between migratory vs. resident birds in how they age. Flamingos that migrate seasonally (to Spain, Italy or North Africa each winter) tend to age more slowly and have lower late-life mortality than those that stay year-round in one place [40] [41]. By contrast, non-migratory “resident” flamingos enjoy safer, easier early adulthood – leading to longer average lifespans (about 33 years vs 25 years for migrants) – but then age faster and suffer higher death rates in later life [42] [43]. The researchers believe this reflects a fundamental trade-off in life history strategy. “Residents live intensely at first, but pay for this pace later on. Migrants, on the other hand, seem to age more slowly,” explained co-author Dr. Sébastien Roques of CNRS [44]. Essentially, flamingos that skip migration can put more energy into early breeding and survival, but that “live fast” approach causes accelerated senescence (aging) after mid-life [45] [46]. Migratory birds face harsher challenges when young, reducing early survival, but those that survive reap benefits of slower aging and prolonged fitness in old age [47] [48]. This remarkable study – published in PNAS – highlights how an animal’s behavior and lifestyle can directly influence its aging process. The findings hint that even within one species, aging isn’t fixed – it can be shaped by environmental and behavioral choices (though the scientists caution the results in birds don’t directly translate to humans) [49]. Still, the work provides a new window into the evolutionary biology of aging, showing that migration, a behavior shared by billions of animals, can alter the pace of biological aging in the wild.
Paleontologists, meanwhile, unveiled innovative research that reconstructs dinosaur lifestyles from microscopic marks on fossil teeth. An international team led from Freie Universität Berlin applied dental microwear texture analysis to 150-million-year-old sauropod teeth, revealing surprising details about what these giant herbivores ate and how they roamed [50] [51]. By examining 322 ultra-detailed 3D scans of teeth from three famous Late Jurassic sites (the Morrison Formation in the USA, Lourinhã Formation in Portugal, and Tendaguru beds in Tanzania), the scientists found each dino group had distinctive wear patterns linking to diet and habitat [52] [53]. Scratch patterns on teeth show that some sauropods (like Diplodocus and kin) were generalist feeders – their varied scratches suggest a broad, mixed diet – while others, like Camarasaurus, had very uniform tooth wear, implying they repeatedly sought out the same food sources year-round [54]. Given highly seasonal climates in their environments, that uniformity hints these dinos migrated seasonally to find their preferred plants when local supply ran low [55]. “I still find it fascinating that microscopic scratches on fossil teeth can tell us so much about diet and even behavior,” said lead author Dr. Daniela Winkler [56]. The most dramatic wear was found on Tanzanian titanosauriforms: their teeth were heavily abraded by grit, likely from sand blown onto vegetation in arid environments [57]. That sandpaper diet left distinctive complex wear, showing how local climate (dry, dusty conditions) directly impacted feeding ecology [58]. Climate emerges as a key factor – overall, teeth from the drier Tanzania site were far more worn than those from lusher North America or Portugal [59]. These findings, published in Nature Ecology & Evolution, illustrate that classic ecological principles like niche partitioning, migration, and climate adaptation were at play even 150 million years ago [60]. As co-author Dr. Emanuel Tschopp put it, with these tooth traces, “we can suddenly make behavioral statements about these enormous extinct animals. Migration, specialization, niche use – it all becomes tangible” [61]. The study not only satisfies dino-curiosity (e.g. which species were homebodies and which were snowbirds of the Jurassic!), but also helps explain how many large herbivores coexisted: by dividing up diets and habitats, sauropods minimized direct competition [62]. It’s a prime example of scientists using novel techniques to breathe life into long-dead creatures, painting a richer picture of ancient ecosystems.
Medicine & Health: COVID Preventive and New Autism Clues
Important developments in human health were reported this weekend. In pandemic news, a common allergy nasal spray showed remarkable effectiveness in preventing COVID-19. In a gold-standard randomized trial of 450 adults, those who regularly used an azelastine antihistamine spray (a typical hay fever remedy) had a 69% lower rate of coronavirus infection over 8 weeks compared to a placebo group [63] [64]. Only 2.2% on azelastine caught COVID, versus 6.7% of the placebo group – about three times as many infections without the spray [65] [66]. “This clinical trial is the first to demonstrate a protective effect in a real-world setting,” said Dr. Robert Bals, the senior author from Saarland University [67]. The treated group also saw far fewer cases of the common cold (rhinovirus), hinting the spray’s broad antiviral properties extend beyond COVID [68] [69]. Azelastine sprays have been over-the-counter for decades to relieve allergies, and earlier lab experiments had hinted at antiviral action [70]. Now, this first human trial (published in JAMA Internal Medicine) shows real-world benefit [71]. Researchers cautioned it’s not a magic bullet – it’s a complementary prophylactic measure, not a substitute for vaccines – but it could be useful for vulnerable people during outbreaks. Dr. Bals noted azelastine is cheap, safe, and easily accessible, so it “could provide an additional, easily accessible prophylactic to complement existing protective measures… especially for vulnerable groups” [72]. Larger studies are planned, but this unexpected find – essentially repurposing an allergy drug as a nasal antiviral shield – represents a promising low-cost tool to reduce respiratory illness spread [73] [74].
In neuroscience, researchers reversed autism-like symptoms in mice, pointing toward new therapeutic strategies for autism spectrum disorder (ASD). The study, from Stanford Medicine, focused on a deep brain region called the reticular thalamic nucleus (RTN) – a kind of sensory “gatekeeper” between brain areas [75]. In a mouse model of autism (mice engineered with a gene mutation seen in ASD), the RTN was hyperactive, leading to traits reminiscent of human autism: seizures, oversensitivity to stimuli, repetitive motions, and social withdrawal [76] [77]. Remarkably, when scientists calmed this overactive node – either with an experimental seizure drug (called Z944) or by using a genetic technique to inhibit those neurons – the mice’s behaviors largely normalized [78] [79]. In fact, the treated ASD-model mice became indistinguishable from typical mice on several measures, essentially erasing their autism-like behaviors [80]. This is striking because 30% of people with autism also have epilepsy [81], hinting at overlapping brain circuitry. The Stanford team showed one link: the same RTN overactivity that contributes to seizures may also drive core ASD symptoms [82] [83]. By repurposing drugs originally developed for epilepsy to target this “brain gate,” they could ease multiple autism-related issues in animals. The study (in Science Advances) identifies the RTN as a novel treatment target for autism [84] [85]. Of course, mouse results don’t immediately translate to humans, but the findings open an intriguing avenue. If future research confirms a similar mechanism in people, clinicians might one day prescribe certain seizure medications or neuromodulation approaches to help manage ASD sensory and social symptoms. At the very least, the work provides new insight into the brain basis of autism, illustrating how an overlooked neural circuit can have wide-ranging effects on behavior. It’s a hopeful development for a disorder that has so far proven very challenging to treat at the neurological level.
Also on the public health front, a massive decades-long study offered a simple but powerful predictor of longevity: childhood blood pressure. Researchers reported that children with even moderately elevated blood pressure by age 7 were far more likely to die of heart disease by their 50s than kids with normal readings [86]. The study tracked thousands of participants from youth into middle age. Those in the highest blood pressure percentiles at age 7 had dramatically higher mid-life mortality from cardiovascular causes [87]. In fact, childhood systolic BP was such a strong indicator that the scientists suggest early screening and intervention for high blood pressure in kids could save lives decades later. This finding underscores the lifelong impact of early health factors – hinting that heart disease prevention might need to start in grade school, not adulthood. While more research is needed to refine the risk estimates, the takeaway is clear: keeping kids’ blood pressure in check (through healthy diet, exercise, and maybe treatment if needed) could significantly improve their chances of a longer, heart-healthy life.
Biotechnology & Genetics: CRISPR Leap and Cancer-Fighting “Sugar” Boost
In biomedical technology, a breakthrough from Northwestern University has turbocharged the CRISPR gene-editing tool. CRISPR holds immense promise for treating genetic diseases by snipping and correcting DNA, but a long-standing hurdle is delivering the CRISPR machinery into cells safely and efficiently [88] [89]. The Northwestern chemists tackled this by creating spherical nucleic acid nanoparticles (SNAs) that package the CRISPR components (Cas9 enzyme, guide RNAs, etc.) in a dense shell of DNA [90] [91]. These tiny DNA-coated balls – roughly 50 nanometers wide – protect the CRISPR cargo and help it sneak into cells without being destroyed [92] [93]. In lab tests on human and animal cells, the DNA-wrapped nanostructures entered cells up to 3× more effectively than standard lipid nanoparticles (like those used in mRNA vaccines) [94]. The result: tripled gene editing success rates and dramatically less toxicity to the cells [95] [96]. Precise DNA fixes (not just cutting but repairing mutations) also improved by over 60% with the new method [97]. “CRISPR is an incredibly powerful tool… but it’s difficult to get CRISPR into the cells and tissues that matter,” explained nanotechnology pioneer Dr. Chad Mirkin, who led the study [98]. “By using SNAs to deliver the machinery required for gene editing, we aimed to maximize CRISPR’s efficiency and expand the number of cell and tissue types that we can deliver it to” [99]. The study, published in PNAS, showcases the growing field of structural nanomedicine – how tweaking a particle’s shape and coating can drastically change its biological performance [100] [101]. Seven SNA-based therapies (for other diseases) are already in human trials, highlighting the potential. With this advance, the dream of using CRISPR to cure illnesses like genetic disorders or cancer moves a step closer, as scientists overcome the delivery challenge that has limited CRISPR’s real-world use.
Speaking of cancer, a separate study revealed a “sweet” discovery about how to make immune cells better cancer killers. Researchers at Van Andel Institute found that glucose – the simple sugar – is not just fuel but a building material that T cells (the immune system’s attack dogs) use to boost their tumor-fighting ability [102] [103]. It was long assumed T cells mainly burn glucose for energy. But by tracing metabolic pathways, the team showed T cells actually divert a significant portion of sugar into creating special glycosphingolipids (GSLs) – complex sugar-lipid molecules essential for T cell function [104] [105]. These GSLs form sturdy “lipid raft” platforms in the T cell membrane that cluster the receptors and signaling proteins needed to activate the cell against cancer [106] [107]. In essence, more glucose uptake → more GSLs → stronger T cell signaling → more potent cancer cell killing [108]. “We knew that T cells need access to glucose to function, but we didn’t know exactly why. It was previously thought T cells mainly break down glucose for energy, but our new work shows that T cells use glucose as a building block for other molecules that are necessary to support T cells’ anti-cancer properties,” said first author Dr. Joseph Longo [109]. When T cells couldn’t make those sugar-lipid building blocks, their anti-tumor activity dropped, confirming GSLs’ importance. The study, published in Cell Metabolism, suggests that feeding T cells more glucose or tweaking their metabolism might enhance immunotherapies like CAR-T cancer treatments. As the senior investigator Dr. Russell Jones put it, both T cells and cancer cells use nutrients to their advantage, and “the more we know about these different fuel sources, the better we can support T cells’ innate cancer-fighting abilities while also developing ways to possibly make cancer cells more vulnerable to immune attack” [110]. This finding fits into a larger trend of immunometabolism research – understanding and hacking the metabolism of immune cells to improve their function. It also underscores a broader principle: sometimes solving a medical puzzle means looking at familiar substances (like common sugar) in a completely new light.
Technology & Society: AI’s “Black Box” and Calls for Regulation
Amid rapid advances in artificial intelligence, a stark warning came from legal and ethics experts: current AI systems may be undermining fundamental human rights – and society isn’t keeping up. Dr. Maria S. Randazzo, a law researcher at Charles Darwin University, published a paper arguing that AI’s breakneck deployment is outpacing our ability to protect privacy, equality, and autonomy [111] [112]. In her analysis (in the Australian Journal of Human Rights), Randazzo points to the “black box problem” of modern AI algorithms: machine-learning models (especially deep neural networks) often operate in opaque ways, making decisions that even their creators can’t fully explain [113] [114]. This opacity means when an AI system denies someone a loan or selects them for extra police screening, people cannot trace or challenge the decision, raising serious issues of due process and fairness [115]. “This is a very significant issue that is only going to get worse without adequate regulation,” Dr. Randazzo said, referring to the lack of transparency and oversight in AI decision-making [116]. She stresses that today’s dominant approaches – whether the U.S.’s market-driven tech growth, China’s state-driven model, or even Europe’s more human-centric regulations – all fall short of a truly global, human-rights-based framework [117]. One colorful quote sums up her take on AI’s true nature: “AI is not intelligent in any human sense at all… It has no clue what it’s doing or why – there’s no thought process as a human would understand it, just pattern recognition stripped of embodiment, memory, empathy, or wisdom.” [118]. In other words, today’s AI excels at crunching data but lacks understanding or ethics, which can lead to biased or harmful outcomes being blindly scaled. Randazzo warns that without international safeguards, we risk “flattening humanity into data points” and eroding dignity for the sake of efficiency [119]. She calls for global cooperation on AI governance, anchored in what makes us human – values like the right to choose, to feel, and to be treated with compassion [120]. Encouragingly, there are moves in this direction (such as the EU’s draft AI Act), but as AI systems become ever more embedded in daily life – from hiring to healthcare – the study serves as a timely reminder. It urges that ethical guardrails and human oversight must keep pace with innovation, so that AI augments human welfare without infringing on human rights. In short, the message is that technology’s progress cannot be viewed in isolation from its societal impact: to truly benefit humanity, AI needs not only clever code but also a conscience, enforced by thoughtful regulation.
Conclusion
From the depths of the ocean to the far reaches of space, the first week of September 2025 brought a flurry of scientific advances and events that together paint a picture of human curiosity and ingenuity. We witnessed the Moon don a red cloak in a celestial alignment, even as researchers back on Earth aligned decades of wave data to demystify rogue waves. We saw scientists turn old tools (allergy sprays, epilepsy drugs) to new purposes, whether shielding against a modern virus or illuminating the brain circuits of autism. Fundamental discoveries – a time crystal twirling under a microscope, or T cells building cancer-fighting rafts from sugar – expanded the frontiers of physics and biology. And through it all, a refrain emerged: understanding our world (and ourselves) better, be it the climate’s fragile rhythms or the ethical challenges of artificial minds, is key to navigating the future. These diverse stories, announced on September 7–8, 2025, remind us that science is a continuous, collective endeavor – one that leaps ahead by solving old mysteries and posing new questions, all in service of progress for our planet and society.
Sources: The information and quotes in this report are drawn from recent press releases, peer-reviewed studies, and news articles published on or around Sept 7–8, 2025, including NASA and media coverage of the eclipse [121] [122], ScienceDaily summaries of research findings [123] [124] [125], and reporting by outlets such as Discover Wildlife (BBC Science Focus) [126] [127], CIDRAP [128], Gizmodo [129], and others as cited above. Each 【source】 link corresponds to the original source material for verification and further reading.
References
1. timesofindia.indiatimes.com, 2. www.sciencedaily.com, 3. www.sciencedaily.com, 4. www.cidrap.umn.edu, 5. www.cidrap.umn.edu, 6. www.sciencedaily.com, 7. www.sciencedaily.com, 8. www.sciencedaily.com, 9. www.sciencedaily.com, 10. www.sciencedaily.com, 11. www.sciencedaily.com, 12. www.sciencedaily.com, 13. www.sciencedaily.com, 14. www.sciencedaily.com, 15. www.discoverwildlife.com, 16. timesofindia.indiatimes.com, 17. timesofindia.indiatimes.com, 18. timesofindia.indiatimes.com, 19. timesofindia.indiatimes.com, 20. www.sciencedaily.com, 21. www.sciencedaily.com, 22. www.sciencedaily.com, 23. www.sciencedaily.com, 24. www.sciencedaily.com, 25. www.sciencedaily.com, 26. www.sciencedaily.com, 27. www.sciencedaily.com, 28. www.sciencedaily.com, 29. www.sciencedaily.com, 30. www.sciencedaily.com, 31. www.sciencedaily.com, 32. www.sciencedaily.com, 33. www.sciencedaily.com, 34. www.discoverwildlife.com, 35. www.discoverwildlife.com, 36. www.discoverwildlife.com, 37. www.discoverwildlife.com, 38. www.sciencedaily.com, 39. www.sciencedaily.com, 40. gizmodo.com, 41. gizmodo.com, 42. gizmodo.com, 43. gizmodo.com, 44. gizmodo.com, 45. gizmodo.com, 46. gizmodo.com, 47. gizmodo.com, 48. gizmodo.com, 49. gizmodo.com, 50. www.sciencedaily.com, 51. www.sciencedaily.com, 52. www.sciencedaily.com, 53. www.sciencedaily.com, 54. www.sciencedaily.com, 55. www.sciencedaily.com, 56. www.sciencedaily.com, 57. www.sciencedaily.com, 58. www.sciencedaily.com, 59. www.sciencedaily.com, 60. www.sciencedaily.com, 61. www.sciencedaily.com, 62. www.sciencedaily.com, 63. www.cidrap.umn.edu, 64. www.cidrap.umn.edu, 65. www.sciencedaily.com, 66. www.cidrap.umn.edu, 67. www.cidrap.umn.edu, 68. www.sciencedaily.com, 69. www.cidrap.umn.edu, 70. www.sciencedaily.com, 71. www.eurekalert.org, 72. www.sciencedaily.com, 73. www.sciencedaily.com, 74. www.cidrap.umn.edu, 75. www.sciencedaily.com, 76. www.sciencedaily.com, 77. www.sciencedaily.com, 78. www.sciencedaily.com, 79. www.sciencedaily.com, 80. www.sciencedaily.com, 81. www.sciencedaily.com, 82. www.sciencedaily.com, 83. www.sciencedaily.com, 84. www.sciencedaily.com, 85. www.news-medical.net, 86. www.sciencedaily.com, 87. www.sciencedaily.com, 88. www.sciencedaily.com, 89. www.sciencedaily.com, 90. www.sciencedaily.com, 91. www.sciencedaily.com, 92. www.sciencedaily.com, 93. www.sciencedaily.com, 94. www.sciencedaily.com, 95. www.sciencedaily.com, 96. www.sciencedaily.com, 97. www.sciencedaily.com, 98. www.sciencedaily.com, 99. www.sciencedaily.com, 100. www.sciencedaily.com, 101. www.sciencedaily.com, 102. www.sciencedaily.com, 103. www.sciencedaily.com, 104. www.sciencedaily.com, 105. www.sciencedaily.com, 106. www.sciencedaily.com, 107. www.sciencedaily.com, 108. www.sciencedaily.com, 109. www.sciencedaily.com, 110. www.sciencedaily.com, 111. www.sciencedaily.com, 112. www.sciencedaily.com, 113. www.sciencedaily.com, 114. www.sciencedaily.com, 115. www.sciencedaily.com, 116. www.sciencedaily.com, 117. www.sciencedaily.com, 118. www.sciencedaily.com, 119. www.sciencedaily.com, 120. www.sciencedaily.com, 121. timesofindia.indiatimes.com, 122. timesofindia.indiatimes.com, 123. www.sciencedaily.com, 124. www.sciencedaily.com, 125. www.sciencedaily.com, 126. www.discoverwildlife.com, 127. www.discoverwildlife.com, 128. www.cidrap.umn.edu, 129. gizmodo.com
