Chromecast vs. $30 Onn: Can Walmart’s Budget 4K Streamer Beat Google’s Own? 🎬🔥

Key Facts & Differences

• Price Showdown: Google’s latest Chromecast with Google TV 4K (now the “Google TV Streamer”) costs about $99 (premium pricing), while Walmart’s Onn Google TV 4K Plus is just $29.88 – a fraction of the cost ^[1]. In other words, you could buy three Onn boxes for the price of one Google device.
• Performance Surprise: Despite the low price, the Onn 4K Plus is a performance champ. Benchmarks show its new processor scoring ~1,146 single-core vs. ~917 for Google’s streamer ^[2]. In real use, the Onn launches apps and navigates snappier than Google’s older Chromecast, which was often laggy ^[3]. Reviewers noted the $30 Onn “soundly outperforms” Google’s $100 device in speed ^[4].
• Hardware & Specs: Google’s streamer doubles the RAM and quadruples storage over the old Chromecast (now 4 GB RAM, 32 GB storage) ts2.tech, plus it has built-in Ethernet and Thread/Matter smart home radios. The tiny Onn 4K Plus has 2 GB RAM, 16 GB storage ^[5] – less memory, but still double the storage of the original Chromecast (which had only 8 GB). Both support 4K HDR video (Dolby Vision, HDR10+) and Dolby Atmos audio. Notably, Onn 4K Plus even includes Wi-Fi 6 support, whereas Google’s pricier box tops out at Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac) ^[6] ts2.tech.
• Software & Features:Both run Google TV OS, so you get the same apps (Netflix, YouTube, Disney+, etc.), Google Assistant voice search, and Chromecast casting from your phone on each ts2.tech. Google’s own device, however, adds some exclusive bells and whistles – like new AI-driven features (automated show summaries, AI-generated screensavers) and a built-in smart home control panel on the TV ts2.tech. The Onn sticks to the basics (which is fine for most users) and even has a dedicated “Free TV” button on its remote that opens a live guide of free channels and your subscriptions in one place ^[7].
• Remote Control & Usability: Google’s voice remote was slightly redesigned for the new streamer – it’s a bit larger with a better button layout and even has a customizable shortcut button ts2.tech. There’s also a remote-finder feature: press a button on the Google box and the remote beeps loudly (a perk previously seen only on high-end Roku remotes) ts2.tech ts2.tech. The Onn 4K Plus remote is simple and straightforward, with quick-launch buttons (Netflix, YouTube, etc.) and even a “Free TV” guide button ^[8], but it lacks backlighting and any locator function. Some earlier Onn models offered a backlit remote, which many found handy in the dark ^[9]. Overall, both remotes can control your TV’s power/volume via HDMI-CEC, and both rely on pressing the mic button for voice (no always-listening mics here).
• Update Support: Both devices are up-to-date with the latest Google TV software. Google’s streamer launches with Android TV 13/14 under the hood and should get a few years of OS updates directly from Google. Impressively, Walmart’s Onn boxes have also received major updates – the 2021 Onn 4K box started on Android 10 and got updated all the way to Android 14 in 2024 ^[10]. In fact, the Onn 4K Pro (2024) just got an Android TV 14 upgrade with improved performance and bug fixes ^[11]. This means the budget Onn devices aren’t being left behind in software, though Google’s own hardware may still get new features first.
• Ecosystem Integration: Google’s streamer is designed as a full Google ecosystem device – it doubles as a smart home hub, with certification as a Matter hub and Thread border router to connect smart lights, locks, sensors, etc. ts2.tech. You can view and control smart devices on your TV screen via the Google Home interface. (For example, pulling up your Nest Doorbell camera feed on the TV is seamless on Google’s box ^[12].) The Onn 4K Plus runs Google TV as well, so it integrates with Google services (YouTube TV, Google Photos screensavers, voice commands) similarly, but lacks the Thread/Matter hardware and advanced hub functions. If you’re deep into smart home gadgets, Google’s streamer adds value there.
• Value Proposition: In short, Walmart’s Onn 4K Plus offers a “Chromecast-like” 4K experience for just $30 ^[13]. It fills the void left by Google discontinuing the old $50 Chromecast dongle – delivering equivalent (or better) performance and the same content selection at a budget price ^[14]. Google’s new Chromecast successor, meanwhile, aims higher: at $99 it competes with premium streamers and justifies its cost with extra features, more storage, and the peace of mind of Google’s brand and support. As one tech reviewer concluded, you can save a lot with Onn if you just need solid 4K streaming, but “if you want Google TV plus all the extra frills of the Google ecosystem, the Google TV Streamer…adds a ton of value.” ^[15]

Hardware, Specs & Performance

Design & Hardware: The Chromecast with Google TV (original 4K model from 2020) was a compact dongle that hid behind your TV. Google’s latest 4K streamer (2024) changes form – it’s a small set-top box that sits by your TV (available in soft white “Porcelain” or gray “Hazel”) ts2.tech. It has an HDMI-out port (cable in the box), a USB-C port for power, and even a built-in Ethernet jack for optional wired connectivity ts2.tech. By contrast, Walmart’s Onn Google TV 4K Plus is a tiny dongle/mini-box (easy to conceal behind the TV) powered via USB-C (cable included) ^[16] – but it has no Ethernet port (it’s Wi-Fi only, though you could use an adapter via its USB-C). Both devices support up to 4K UHD @ 60Hz output with rich colors (Dolby Vision, HDR10/10+ formats) and immersive sound (Dolby Atmos over HDMI) for a true cinema experience at home ts2.tech ts2.tech. They also both include HDMI-CEC and IR capabilities to control TV power and volume from the remote ts2.tech.

Internal Specs: Google’s new streamer is significantly beefed up over the old Chromecast dongle. It features 4 GB of RAM and 32 GB of internal storage, a major jump from the 2 GB/8 GB of the previous Chromecast ts2.tech. This extra memory and storage mean more apps and smoother multitasking without running out of space for downloads. The Onn 4K Plus comes with 2 GB RAM and 16 GB storage ^[17] – notably double the storage of the old Chromecast, but half of Google’s new box. The Onn 4K Pro model (Walmart’s $49 streamer from 2024) actually offered 3 GB RAM and 32 GB storage, but the cheaper Plus model dialed those down to hit the low price point ^[18]. In everyday use, 2 GB RAM hasn’t been an issue for streaming: “I never felt like the Onn 4K Plus was slow while streaming, and everything…felt much smoother than on the aging Chromecast” one reviewer noted ^[19]. However, power users who install lots of apps or games might appreciate the Google device’s 32 GB space and extra RAM for future-proofing.

Under the hood, both run efficient ARM-based quad-core processors, but the chip generations differ. The Onn 4K Plus uses a newer Amlogic S905X5 (2.5 GHz quad-core) ^[20], while Google’s streamer reportedly runs a MediaTek MT8696 (2.0 GHz quad-core). In plain English: the Onn’s processor is newer and tuned for performance, whereas Google’s is a solid chip but not a massive leap over prior devices. In fact, in Geekbench 5 CPU tests, the Onn 4K Plus outscored Google’s streamer – scoring about 1,146 (single-core) and 3,131 (multi-core) to Google’s roughly 917 and 2,527 ^[21]. That’s a surprising win for the ultra-budget device, making it one of the fastest Android/Google TV boxes in raw speed. (For context, only Amazon’s much pricier Fire TV Cube slightly beats the Onn’s scores among streaming gadgets ^[22].) Meanwhile, the older Chromecast with Google TV (2020) by comparison scored around 722 / 1,728, which explains why it felt slow by 2025 standards ^[23].

Real-World Performance: Specs and benchmarks aside, what does this mean for the viewer? In everyday navigation, both the Google and Onn streamers handle the Google TV interface smoothly – browsing menus, launching apps, and playing videos in up to 4K HDR is generally quick and stutter-free on both. Reviewers found the new Google TV box “snappier and more reliable than the lag-plagued Chromecast from a few years ago” ts2.tech, and the Onn 4K Plus similarly delivers “smooth performance” for common streaming tasks ^{[24] [25]}. The Onn’s advantage in CPU power shows up in things like slightly faster app load times and menu transitions – it feels zippy. The older Chromecast dongle, in contrast, often suffered from minor delays or “hitches” when scrolling through heavy content menus or switching profiles, due to its limited RAM and aging chip. Those issues are largely solved in the new Google streamer and the Onn Plus alike.

However, the Google device’s extra RAM can help with heavy multitasking (e.g. quickly swapping between several apps or running more background processes). And if you plan to do more than just watch video – say, install Android games, emulators, or run a VPN – the Onn 4K Pro with 3 GB or Google’s 4 GB might cope better with those demanding tasks. The Onn 4K Plus is optimized as a no-frills streamer: it “ditches some of the Pro’s higher-end features” (like USB 3.0 port and hands-free voice) in exchange for that faster processor ^{[26] [27]}. For pure streaming of Netflix, YouTube, Disney+, etc., the difference in actual video playback quality is negligible – once your show or movie is playing, a $30 device will deliver the same Netflix 4K stream as a $100 one. Where you’ll notice differences is in loading and navigating: here even the budget Onn shines, thanks to its efficient chip and Google’s well-optimized software. Bottom line: the Onn 4K Plus proves you don’t need to spend a fortune to get responsive 4K streaming, while Google’s own device ensures none of the old Chromecast’s sluggishness remains (even if the speed bump over Onn is modest in practice) ts2.tech.

Connectivity: Both devices include Bluetooth (for connecting game controllers, headphones, etc.) and support common Wi-Fi standards. It’s worth noting the Onn 4K Plus has Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax) capability ^[28], which can mean better wireless performance if you have a Wi-Fi 6 router – a surprising perk in such a cheap streamer. Google’s new Chromecast/Streamer supports up to Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac) ts2.tech. This omission of Wi-Fi 6 in the Google box was a bit of a letdown to some reviewers (given its price) ts2.tech. That said, Google compensates with the built-in Ethernet jack for those who prefer a wired connection for maximum stability. The Onn has no built-in Ethernet, but it does use a USB-C power port – tech tinkerers have found you can plug certain USB-C hubs or adapters to add Ethernet or USB storage if you really want, though this isn’t an officially supported use.

When it comes to audio-visual format support, both devices handle the mainstream standards: Ultra HD 4K resolution, HDR formats (including Dolby Vision and HDR10+), and Dolby Digital/Dolby Atmos audio passthrough over HDMI – so streaming from services like Netflix, Amazon Prime, Disney+, etc., you’ll get full quality. One limitation to be aware of: like many streamers, they do not support older DTS surround formats or lossless Blu-ray audio codecs (DTS:X, Dolby TrueHD) for home theater enthusiasts ts2.tech. This mainly matters if you play local media files with those audio tracks – streaming apps use Dolby formats which work fine. Devices like the Nvidia Shield TV or Fire TV Cube are better in that niche since they can passthrough DTS-HD audio to receivers ts2.tech. For the vast majority of users who stick to popular apps, this isn’t a concern at all – both Google and Onn streamers will deliver stunning 4K HDR picture and cinematic sound from your favorite apps without a hitch.

Software & Platform Features

Because both the Chromecast with Google TV and Walmart’s Onn box run Google TV software, the core user experience is very similar. Google TV (which is a modern interface on top of Android TV) has a content-centric home screen: it aggregates recommendations from across your streaming apps, shows trending titles, and has Google Assistant ready for voice commands. When you set up either device, you use the Google Home app or on-screen prompts to sign in with your Google account, and you’ll see a familiar Google TV home menu with tabs like For You, Live, Movies, Shows, Apps, and Library. All the major streaming apps are available via the Google Play Store – from Netflix, YouTube, HBO Max, Disney+ and Hulu, to Peacock, Prime Video, Apple TV+, Spotify, etc. If a service exists, odds are it’s on Google TV. Unlike some competitor platforms, there’s no app gap on Google’s ecosystem – it even has Apple TV and Apple Music now, which wasn’t always the case on Android TV.

Voice Assistant: Both devices include Google Assistant integration deeply. The remote has a microphone button – press it and you can search for shows or control the device by voice (“Play Stranger Things on Netflix,” “Open YouTube,” or “Show me free comedy movies”). You can also ask general questions (“What’s the weather?”) and see answers on the big screen. The Google Assistant is the same on both, since that’s part of the software. The only difference: the Onn 4K Pro (not the Plus) actually had far-field microphones for hands-free “Hey Google” commands – effectively acting like a smart speaker that you can talk to from across the room ^[29]. The cheaper Onn 4K Plus and Google’s own streamer do not have always-listening mics (you need to use the remote’s mic). If hands-free voice control of your TV is something you want, Amazon’s Fire TV Cube is another device with that feature, as was the Onn Pro. For most users, pressing a button to talk to Google Assistant is easy enough – and it avoids any inadvertent voice activations.

Google TV Interface: The look and feel of the interface is identical on Chromecast and Onn – you get Google’s slick, modern menu system with rich graphics and personalized recommendations. Both support creating user profiles (so each family member can have their own watchlist and suggestions). Both also have a Live TV tab/guide that integrates live streaming services. In fact, Walmart’s Onn remote highlights this with the “Free TV” button, which jumps you straight to a live channel guide of Pluto TV, Tubi, and other free streaming channels, plus any live TV subscription you link (like YouTube TV or Sling) ^[30]. Notably, Google’s OS added free live channels integration in 2023+ as well, so this isn’t exclusive to Walmart – but the Onn remote’s dedicated button is a nice touch for cord-cutters to discover free content easily.

Casting & Multi-Device: As the name Chromecast implies, Google’s streamers (and any Google TV device, including Onn) have Chromecast built-in. This means you can open an app on your phone or tablet (Android or iPhone) and use the “Cast” button to send video or music straight to the TV. You can also cast from Chrome browser on a laptop. This feature is super handy for things like sharing YouTube videos with a group or casting a slideshow of your Google Photos to the TV. Both the Chromecast and Onn support this equally well ts2.tech. This is an advantage over devices like Roku (which has limited casting) or Apple TV (which uses AirPlay instead of Chromecast). If you’re used to the simplicity of casting YouTube or Netflix from your phone, you’ll feel right at home – your new Google or Onn streamer effectively is a Chromecast receiver, just with its own remote and interface too.

Exclusive Features (Google’s streamer): Where Google’s own device pulls ahead is in some new software features that were introduced alongside it. Google has started integrating generative AI into the TV experience – on the Google TV Streamer you can get automated summaries of movies/shows (using Google’s Gemini AI, it can display a short AI-written summary of what you’re about to watch) and even an AI-powered screensaver mode that can generate art or scenery for your ambient mode ts2.tech. These are more fun extras than must-haves, and they require internet of course. Additionally, Google’s streamer runs the very latest version of the OS (Android TV 13 at launch, upgradable to 14), ensuring you have the newest interface tweaks and performance improvements. The Onn Plus launched with Android TV 14 as well ^[31], so it’s actually just as up-to-date in that sense. But if Google introduces a new feature (say a new voice function or smart home integration) that is exclusive to its hardware, you’d see it there first. For example, one review noted that the Google TV Streamer has an on-screen smart home dashboard for controlling devices, which is part of Google’s vision of it as a hub ts2.tech. Onn devices, even with Android 14, might not surface that in the same way, or could get it later. Still, the differences in everyday platform experience are relatively minor – both use the same Google TV platform, with the same vast app selection and Google services.

Updates & Support: A big part of software is how long it stays current. Google typically promises several years of updates for its hardware. The old Chromecast with Google TV (2020) received major OS updates (from Android 10 up to Android 12) and continuous security patches. The new Google TV Streamer should likewise get updates for a few years, keeping it secure and possibly gaining new features over time. Walmart’s Onn devices, being so inexpensive, pleasantly surprised users by getting significant updates too – as mentioned, the 2021 model jumped to Android 14 in late 2024 ^[32], and the Onn 4K Pro got Android 14 in mid-2025 ^[33] to “bring it more in line with Google’s TV Streamer, all at a fraction of the cost” ^[34]. This indicates Walmart is cooperating closely with Google to keep the OS updated. That’s great news for longevity: even a cheap device can have an up-to-date interface and remain compatible with new apps for years. One thing to consider, however, is long-term reliability and support. Google’s own products come with customer support and warranty service that some trust more than a store-brand device. Onn is Walmart’s brand and generally reliable, but as an ultra-budget line, quality control can vary (one reviewer noted Onn products are mass-produced and occasionally one might have an issue – though his personal units lasted fine over years) ^[35]. Fortunately, both Walmart and Google have decent return policies if something is defective out of the box. And the active community of users online (Reddit, forums) means you can often troubleshoot common issues for either device with a quick search.

Remote Controls & User Experience

A streaming device’s remote control can greatly affect day-to-day enjoyment. Google and Walmart take slightly different approaches, but both remotes are small, simple voice remotes with just the right essentials.

Google’s Voice Remote: The new Google TV Streamer’s remote is an evolution of the one that shipped with the 2020 Chromecast. It’s a slim wand with a mic button, a navigation wheel, volume rocker, and a few dedicated app buttons (YouTube, Netflix, etc. – which are customizable on Google’s device). Google made the new remote a bit longer with a better button layout for easier reach, and it added one programmable shortcut button you can map to a favorite app or command ts2.tech. Importantly, this remote can pair with your TV to control power and volume (via infrared or HDMI-CEC), so you likely won’t need your TV’s original remote for basic functions. A standout feature is the “Find My Remote” function: if you ever lose the remote in the couch cushions, you can press a button on the Google streamer box and the remote will start beeping loudly ts2.tech, making it easy to locate. This is a premium touch (similar to high-end Roku remotes) that alleviates a common annoyance.

Walmart Onn Remote: The Onn 4K Plus comes with a white plastic voice remote that is very similar in layout to Google’s, minus the remote-finder technology. It has arrow keys, volume control, Google Assistant button, and several labeled service buttons (Netflix, Disney+, YouTube, Paramount+ on our unit) ^[36]. Unique to Walmart’s is the “Free TV” button right below Home – pressing it pulls up the integrated live TV guide for free streaming channels and any live services you use ^[37]. This is a convenient shortcut for cord-cutters. The Onn remote can also control TV power/volume once you set it up during installation (it’ll ask who made your TV, etc.). One thing to note: the Onn 4K Pro (2024) had an upgraded remote with backlit keys (illumination for dark rooms) and even a built-in speaker for voice commands (to enable hands-free “Hey Google”) ^{[38] [39]}. The cheaper Onn 4K Plus remote does not have backlighting or far-field mics – it’s a basic model, similar to the old Chromecast’s remote in functionality. Some users actually prefer the Onn Pro remote if they’ve experienced it, but that Pro model is a bit harder to find now and costs more.

In use, both remotes are very straightforward and user-friendly. Setup is simple – the Onn and Chromecast remotes will automatically pair with the device via Bluetooth, and then guide you to program TV control if desired. The buttons have a clicky tactile feel. Google’s remote might feel a tad more premium, and the fact that you can reprogram one of its buttons (using the Google TV settings) to launch any app or even a custom command is a nice perk. On Onn’s remote, the app buttons are fixed, but you’re at least getting four popular apps right at your fingertips.

The voice command experience is essentially identical: press and hold the mic button on either remote, speak your request, and release – Google Assistant will process it and show results on the TV. This can be faster than typing on an on-screen keyboard, especially for searching movie titles or YouTube videos. Both remotes rely on an IR blaster for TV controls (plus HDMI CEC) which works reliably for most brands.

Usability: Both devices prioritize a simple, easy setup and navigation. Initial setup on both Chromecast and Onn involves plugging into HDMI and power, then either using the Google Home mobile app or following on-screen steps to connect to Wi-Fi and sign in. The Onn 4K Plus advertises a “less than five minutes” setup with a QR code – indeed, you can scan a code with your phone to quickly link the device to your Google account ^[40]. Google’s setup is similarly quick (often asking if you want to copy settings from your phone). Once up and running, everyday use is basically picking up the remote and selecting what you want to watch on the home screen or via voice. Google TV’s interface can be content-dense (with lots of recommendations), but it’s also very intuitive to navigate by category, and you can customize certain sections or use an Apps-Only mode to disable ads and suggestions if you prefer a simpler home screen ^[41]. The Onn 4K Plus indeed supports the “Apps Only” mode which removes sponsored content from the home UI for a cleaner look ^[42] – a nice option for minimalists.

One advantage of Google’s own streamer is that it’s part of the official Google hardware family, so it may get some bonus perks. For example, Google has been known to run promotions (like several months of Netflix, YouTube Premium, or Stadia trials) for buyers of their devices. A Reddit comment speculated that Google might offer something like “6 months of Netflix free with purchase eventually, like they did with the Chromecast” ^[43] – of course, promotions vary and aren’t guaranteed, but it’s something Walmart’s device wouldn’t typically include.

Bottom line on remotes/usability: Neither device requires any technical expertise – they’re aimed at the general public, and it shows in the friendly user experience. Google’s remote edges out with a locator function and slightly more polish, while Walmart’s includes a handy Live TV shortcut and covers the basics perfectly well. If you value a backlit remote and hands-free voice, oddly it’s the Walmart Onn Pro (if you can find one) that offers those, whereas Google’s device does not. But for most people, the standard remotes here are more than sufficient for couch navigation and voice searching your next binge-watch.

Pricing & Value

When comparing Chromecast with Google TV vs other Google TV boxes, price is arguably the biggest differentiator. Here’s how things stack up in late 2024/2025:

• Chromecast with Google TV (4K) – Originally launched at $49.99. This device is now essentially replaced by the new model (often referred to as the Google TV Streamer). The new Google TV 4K box comes in at $99.99 MSRP ts2.tech – double the old price, reflecting its more premium positioning. It’s frequently on sale for around $80-$90 at retailers ^[44], but it’s still a high-end streamer by price. Experts note that Google’s $99 price “is more in line with premium devices from Roku, Apple, and Amazon” ts2.tech than with entry-level sticks.
• Walmart Onn. Google TV 4K Plus – Priced at an incredibly low $29.88 ^[45]. This under-$30 price tag undercuts just about every name-brand 4K streaming device on the market. Even Walmart’s own lineup has the slightly fancier Onn 4K Pro at ~$49 (when in stock). At $30, the Onn 4K Plus is delivering 4K HDR streaming for the price of a typical HD Roku or Amazon stick – an almost impulse-buy level cost. Despite that, it doesn’t feel cheap in operation: “a premium 4K experience…rivaling more expensive options” as one review put it ^[46]. The low price does sometimes translate to scarcity – these units have been hard to keep in stock, with reports of them selling out quickly in stores and online ^[47]. Still, if you find one, it’s arguably the best bang for your buck in streaming right now.

So, is the Google streamer worth 3x the Onn’s price? It depends on your needs. For basic streaming needs, the Onn 4K Plus covers almost everything the average viewer wants – at a rock-bottom price. It’s especially appealing for outfitting multiple TVs in the house or as an entry-level device for a secondary TV. As Cord Cutters News summarized, “the Onn…combines affordability, versatility, and strong performance within the Google TV ecosystem, making it an attractive option for budget-conscious cord-cutters.” ^[48] If all you want is Google TV and 4K, why pay more?

On the other hand, Google’s $100 device offers more premium features and future-proofing. You’re paying for double the memory/storage (useful for heavy app users), a nicer remote with remote-finder, an Ethernet port (for those who prefer wired networking), and the integrated smart home capabilities. It also carries the Google brand, which for some means confidence in timely updates and quality. For a tech enthusiast who will use the smart home hub functions, or for someone who kept bumping against the old Chromecast’s storage limits, the higher cost might be justified by the convenience and expanded capabilities. Early reviews generally praised the new Google Chromecast/Streamer as a much-needed upgrade that “finally addresses the performance and capacity complaints of its predecessor” ts2.tech. It feels fast and polished, and positions Google strongly in the high-end streaming arena.

There’s also the consideration of ecosystem loyalty. If you already use Google Nest speakers, cameras, etc., you might lean towards Google’s own streamer to get that seamless integration (even if the Onn can do a lot of Google things too). Conversely, if you just need a cheap streaming box for Netflix and YouTube on a spare TV, the Onn is almost unbeatable for value.

In summary: The Onn 4K Plus is an incredible value – so much so that it has been called “the closest thing to a Chromecast successor…for only $30” ^[49]. It punches above its weight in performance and features, proving you don’t need to spend $50-$100 for a quality 4K streamer ^{[50] [51]}. Google’s Chromecast/Streamer, while much pricier, targets the segment of users willing to invest in a more feature-rich device – effectively Google is saying this is their answer to the Apple TV 4K and Nvidia Shields of the world. For many general consumers, the Onn does 90% of the job at 30% of the cost, which is hard to ignore. But premium buyers will appreciate the extras and possibly longer support life of the Google hardware.

It’s also worth noting that both devices often see discounts. Walmart might drop the Onn’s price even further during holiday sales (making a stocking-stuffer out of a 4K streamer), and Google’s device might be bundled with services or marked down occasionally. Always compare current prices – but if you see the Onn in stock at $30, that’s already a steal for what you get.

Ecosystem Integration & Smart Home

One of the strengths of Google’s platform is how well it ties into a broader ecosystem of services and devices. Here’s how these streamers integrate:

Google Ecosystem (Chromecast/Google TV Streamer): Google’s own device is designed as an extension of the Google ecosystem in your living room. It not only runs Google TV, but also acts as a smart home hub: it’s a certified Matter hub and Thread border router ts2.tech. In practical terms, that means if you have smart home gadgets (lights, thermostats, locks, sensors) that use the new Matter standard or Thread protocol, the Google TV box can directly connect and manage them. For example, you could set up Matter-compatible smart bulbs without needing a separate hub – the Google box handles it. It also supports Google Home integration – you can pull up a new on-screen control center to check your Nest cameras, adjust your smart thermostat, or view doorbell notifications right on the TV ts2.tech. This effectively turns your TV into a giant smart display when needed. Reviewers found this integration handy, though noted it’s not yet a full replacement for something like Apple’s HomeKit hub – Google’s box can’t (at least currently) run advanced home automation routines on its own when the TV is off, for instance ts2.tech. It’s more about convenience: using the voice remote to say “Show me the front door camera” and having the video feed pop up on the screen, or controlling smart devices via a menu instead of grabbing your phone.

Additionally, Google’s streamer fully supports Chromecast built-in (as mentioned) and things like Google Photos – you can have your photo albums display as ambient screensavers, and you can use voice commands to show specific Google Photo albums on the TV. It’s also tightly integrated with services like YouTube (of course) – the remote even has a YouTube button, and the interface gives YouTube and YouTube TV a prominent placement (which is great if you’re a YouTube TV subscriber for live TV). Using Google Assistant on the device can also control other Google speakers – for example, you could say “Play music on Living Room speaker” and it will act as a controller for your other devices. One thing it cannot do (at least as of 2025) is use other Google/Nest speakers as a home theater audio output for the TV ts2.tech ts2.tech. In contrast, Apple allows pairing HomePods with Apple TV for TV sound; Google hasn’t enabled a similar feature with Nest Audio speakers yet, a limitation to note ts2.tech ts2.tech.

Onn/Google TV Device Integration: The Walmart Onn being a Google-certified device means it integrates with your Google account and services almost as fully as Google’s own. You sign in with Google, it shows up in your Google Home app as a device, and you can use Google Assistant on any phone or speaker to send commands to it (like “Hey Google, play The Crown on Basement TV” will turn on the TV and start Netflix on the Onn, if you’ve named it “Basement TV” in the Home app). It supports Chromecast casting just like the Chromecast does ts2.tech – because fundamentally it is an Android/Google TV device with casting capabilities. This means if you have mixed ecosystems (say you use an iPhone but prefer Google’s TV platform), either device works fine – you can cast from iOS Google apps or use the Google Home app on iOS to control it.

Where the Onn diverges is that it does not have the hardware for Thread/Matter, so it won’t act as a smart home hub on its own. You also might not get any brand-specific tie-ins (e.g. there’s no Onn-specific mobile app or account – it’s all Google). For many, that’s absolutely fine and simpler. The Onn is essentially a conduit to the Google ecosystem at low cost. If you use Alexa or Siri for voice on other devices, note that the Google TV devices won’t integrate with those (aside from Alexa having a skill to control YouTube on Chromecast, etc., which is very limited). They like when you stay in Google’s world: Google Assistant is the assumed choice for voice control here.

Updates & Longevity in Ecosystem: Google’s own hardware might have a slight edge in how long it stays central to the ecosystem. For example, if Google releases a big new Google TV interface overhaul or a fancy feature, they may ensure it hits their Chromecast/Streamer first. That said, because Google TV is an evolving platform for many manufacturers, even the Onn can receive major new features via updates (as evidenced by its jump to Android 14). Google has also been unifying features across devices – e.g., the Live Tab with over 800 free channels was an update that came to all Google TV devices, not just Google’s brand. So, ecosystem-wise, an Onn 4K Plus today gives you about 95% of the Google experience you’d get on the official device. If your home is filled with Google services, both fit in nicely – your Android phone can be used as a remote control via the Google TV app for either device, you can use voice casting, etc. The differences are more around that smart home Thread support and future expandability.

Comparing with Other Ecosystems: It’s useful to note how this compares if you choose a different streaming platform: Roku and Amazon Fire TV have their own ecosystems (Roku is more standalone with limited smart home integration; Amazon ties into Alexa and Echo speakers). Apple TV 4K ties into the Apple ecosystem heavily (Siri, HomeKit, AirPlay). Nvidia Shield, being Android TV, also ties into Google (similar to these devices, but also Nvidia’s gaming ecosystem). We’ll cover those competitors next, but as far as Google-centric ecosystem benefits, both the Chromecast and Onn give you them – with Google’s own hardware pushing the envelope a bit more in tying your smart home and AI features into the TV experience.

In short, if you’re a Google household (Android phones, Nest thermostats, Google Wi-Fi, etc.), the new Chromecast/Google TV box is like a natural extension of that world onto your TV, complete with acting as a hub for your gadgets. If you just want the content and Google’s streaming interface without the extra ecosystem frills, the Onn does that beautifully for a lot less money.

How They Compare to Other 4K Streaming Devices

The streaming landscape is crowded in 2025. Chromecast with Google TV and Walmart’s Onn are part of the Google TV camp, but they compete with devices from Roku, Amazon (Fire TV), Apple, and Nvidia, among others. Here’s a look at how the major competitors stack up and any upcoming models to watch for:

Roku Streaming Devices

Roku is one of the most popular streaming platforms due to its simplicity and huge app selection. Roku’s lineup ranges from affordable sticks ($30) up to higher-end boxes ($100). The Roku Streaming Stick 4K (often ~$40 or less on sale) is a direct rival to Chromecast and Onn – it’s compact, supports 4K Dolby Vision, and is praised as “the utter value in streaming devices” for its mix of features and price ^[52]. Roku’s interface is very easy to use, with a straightforward grid of app icons and unbiased search (they don’t push one content service over another). However, Roku’s home screen does include some banner ads and promoted content (though fairly unobtrusive) ts2.tech.

At the high end, the Roku Ultra (2022/2024 models) is around $99 and comparable to Google’s $99 streamer. The latest Roku Ultra introduced support for Wi-Fi 6, a faster quad-core processor, and even HDMI 2.1 features like QMS (Quick Media Switching) which eliminates the brief black screen when changing frame rates ts2.tech. It also comes with Roku’s best Voice Remote Pro, which has a rechargeable battery, a 3.5mm headphone jack for private listening, and a lost remote finder (either by a button on the box or voice command – the remote will beep, similar to Google’s) ts2.tech. Roku’s remote also supports both Alexa and Google Assistant in a limited capacity, if you prefer those voice assistants, but typically people use the built-in Roku voice system for searches.

One advantage of Roku is its extensive free content integration – the Roku Channel offers a lot of free movies and shows, and Roku’s recent OS updates added a ton of free live channels as well. Google TV has its own free channels initiative now, but Roku has been at it longer. A small downside is that Roku devices (especially the sticks) historically lacked support for certain formats like Dolby Atmos in some apps or AirPlay – but Roku has been improving this. The Streaming Stick 4K now supports Dolby Vision and Atmos (though older models didn’t have Atmos) ^[53].

In terms of new models: Roku launched two new Streaming Stick models in April 2025 (a base “Roku Streaming Stick” and a “Roku Streaming Stick Plus”), which may replace the current 4K stick ^[54]. Details suggest these will continue Roku’s trend of minor hardware upgrades (possibly better Wi-Fi, maybe new voice remote features). We’re awaiting reviews to see their performance, but Roku’s consistency means they’ll likely remain a top choice for ease of use. Bottom line: if you prioritize a no-fuss interface and platform-neutral approach, Roku is hard to beat. But you won’t get the deep Google integration or Chromecast casting (Roku has its own screen mirroring and an app for casting certain content, but it’s not as universal). Roku also doesn’t have a built-in voice assistant for smart home control – it focuses just on streaming.

Amazon Fire TV (Stick & Cube)

Amazon’s Fire TV devices are another big player, especially for those who like Alexa and Amazon’s ecosystem. The Fire TV lineup includes the Fire TV Stick 4K ($50), the enhanced Fire TV Stick 4K Max ($60), and the premium Fire TV Cube (~$140). In performance, Amazon’s devices have made leaps: the Fire TV Cube (3rd Gen, 2022) is often cited as “one of the fastest streaming devices on the market,” with an octa-core processor that goes toe-to-toe with Roku Ultra and Apple TV in speed ts2.tech. It also has unique hardware: the Cube is a hybrid streamer + Echo speaker. It has built-in far-field microphones and a speaker, so you can use Alexa hands-free (“Alexa, play The Boys on Prime Video”) and get responses even with the TV off. It also features an HDMI input port, letting it control cable boxes or Blu-ray players by voice, and IR blasters to act as a universal remote for your whole setup ts2.tech – very handy if you want voice-controlling everything.

For most people, the Fire TV Stick 4K Max (2nd Gen, 2023) hits the sweet spot. It’s a dongle like Chromecast, now upgraded with Wi-Fi 6E support and 16 GB storage (double the previous 8 GB) ts2.tech. It’s only about $10 more than the standard Fire Stick 4K and brings a faster 1.7 GHz CPU, so it’s quite snappy. Amazon’s pricing is aggressive – often these sticks are on sale (sometimes $30-40 for the 4K Max). In fact, at $60 list, Amazon undercuts Google’s $99 box significantly while offering similar 4K HDR output. Fire devices support Dolby Vision, Dolby Atmos, and most apps, plus they now have AirPlay support for Apple device casting and can work with Alexa’s whole-home music and routines.

The trade-off with Fire TV is the interface: it is heavily Amazon-centric and ad-supported. The home screen prioritizes Amazon Prime Video content and has multiple sponsored rows. Reviewers have called the Fire TV interface “crowded” and “ad-laden,” which some tolerate only because the hardware is fast enough to make navigation smooth ts2.tech. If you’re a big Prime Video user or have Alexa all around your home, Fire TV fits nicely – you can speak to Alexa through the remote or Cube to control smart home devices, check your Ring cameras on TV, etc., similar to Google’s integration but within Alexa’s ecosystem. For those who aren’t Amazon-centric, the interface can feel like it’s always pushing something on you – it’s not as neutral as Google or Roku.

No major new models have been announced yet for 2025, but Amazon tends to refresh hardware every couple of years. The 2023 Sticks were the latest, and they might do a Fire TV Cube 4th Gen in 2024 or 2025 if they follow past cadence. Amazon also now sells TVs with Fire TV built-in. In any case, the current Fire TV family is up-to-date and powerful. In summary: Fire TV is great for Alexa fans and offers top-notch performance for the price (especially the Cube for power users), but be ready for an interface that doubles as an Amazon storefront.

Apple TV 4K

Apple TV 4K is the premium option for those in the Apple ecosystem. The latest model (2022, 3rd generation) is priced at $129 (64 GB) or $149 (128 GB with Ethernet) – so it’s the most expensive mainstream streamer, but also arguably the most powerful. It runs on Apple’s A15 Bionic chip, which is the same chip used in the iPhone 13/14 – meaning it’s significantly more powerful than the chips in any of the above devices ts2.tech. In practical terms, the Apple TV 4K delivers ultra-fast, fluid navigation and multitasking ts2.tech. You can jump in and out of apps, scroll through heavy graphics, or play Apple Arcade games effortlessly. It also has a clean, polished tvOS interface with zero ads – one of the only platforms with no sponsored content at all ts2.tech. Instead, the home screen is just your apps, and Apple’s approach to aggregation is the “Up Next” row in the Apple TV app, but it’s not forced on you.

For video and audio, Apple TV 4K supports all the major formats except a couple: it does Dolby Vision, HDR10+, Dolby Atmos, etc., but it does not support DTS:X or Dolby TrueHD passthrough (similar to Google) ts2.tech. This mainly affects hobbyist local media users – streaming services are fine. Apple is unique in offering spatial audio support if you use AirPods with your Apple TV (personal surround sound). And speaking of unique, Apple TV integrates deeply with other Apple products: you can use your iPhone as a remote or for text input, you can view iCloud Photos, and use AirPlay to cast from any iPhone/iPad or Mac. It also offers Apple Fitness+ (turning your TV into a workout screen, with Apple Watch syncing), Apple Arcade for gaming, and acts as a HomeKit Hub. With Thread radio built-in, Apple TV 4K (2021 and newer) serves as a Thread border router and Matter controller just like Google’s box ts2.tech. And with Siri on the remote, you can voice control HomeKit devices or ask for info, similar to using Siri on your phone.

The Siri Remote that comes with Apple TV is a sleek aluminum rechargeable remote. It doesn’t have a lost remote finder (and unfortunately not backlit either), but it’s solid and simple, with Siri voice, a touch-clickpad for navigation, and TV control via IR.

Apple TV 4K is often favored by those who want a premium, privacy-focused experience. There are no ads and Apple doesn’t track viewing to the extent others might, which is a selling point for some ts2.tech. The downsides are price – you pay a lot more – and ironically, if you’re not an Apple user otherwise, you won’t leverage many of its ecosystem benefits. On a technical level, some advanced users also lament the lack of support for certain open formats (no native Kodi app in the App Store, no expandable storage, etc., as Apple keeps a tighter grip).

Looking ahead, Apple is rumored to be working on a new Apple TV model, possibly for late 2025, with an even faster chip and maybe new features ts2.tech. Details are sparse (the rumor comes from 9to5Mac and MacRumors reports ts2.tech), but given Apple’s 2–3 year update cycle, a 2025 or 2026 Apple TV with perhaps an A17 chip could happen. For now, the 2022 model is current and plenty powerful.

Nvidia Shield TV

The Nvidia Shield TV (2019) is an older yet still highly-regarded streaming device, especially among tech enthusiasts and home theater geeks. Nvidia hasn’t released new hardware since 2019, but the Shield TV Pro (2019) remains on sale ($199, though often $149 on sale) and the smaller Shield TV “tube” ($129). These run Android TV (now updated with the Google TV-like interface). What sets Shield apart is its focus on performance, updates, and flexibility. It uses Nvidia’s Tegra X1+ chip – an older chip (similar to what was in the Nintendo Switch console) that still holds up decently. The Shield’s real strengths are gaming and media capabilities. It can function as a Plex media server, it supports 3D graphics for some Android games and Nvidia’s GeForce Now cloud gaming, and it has unique features like AI upscaling (using neural networks to sharpen and upgrade HD video to 4K – this impressed a lot of reviewers as making 1080p content look almost like native 4K) ts2.tech.

For A/V enthusiasts, Shield supports the widest range of codecs: Dolby Vision, HDR10, Dolby Atmos, DTS:X, Dolby TrueHD, DTS-HD MA – you name it, it can passthrough it to a receiver ts2.tech. It also is one of the few with a microSD card slot (on the tube model) and USB ports (on the Pro) for external storage or peripherals. The remote is quite nice too: a triangular shape with backlit buttons, a built-in remote finder (you can ping it from the Shield app or device), and both IR and Bluetooth functionality.

The Shield runs full Android TV and lets you do more “power-user” stuff like install emulator apps, pair Bluetooth controllers, or even use it as a smart home controller via third-party apps. It also has Google Assistant (with an option for always-listening if you connect the Shield to a compatible speaker or use its mic button) and works with Alexa (you can link it to be controlled via an Echo). It’s a very versatile box – hence its loyal fanbase even years later.

The downsides: It’s expensive, and as hardware ages, certain new standards aren’t supported – for instance, the Shield does not support AV1 video codec in hardware ts2.tech (AV1 is a newer efficient codec some streaming services have started using for 4K streaming; if needed the Shield uses software decoding which is not as efficient). Also, despite its age, Nvidia has continued to provide updates – the Shield got a major update in 2022 and even a new one in February 2025 (Shield Experience 9.2) that added features like support for AURO-3D audio and various fixes ^{[55] [56]}. This surprised many who thought Nvidia might have abandoned it, but shows the device is still supported 6+ years on ^{[57] [58]}. That said, Nvidia appears to have no new Shield hardware announced. Rumors pop up occasionally (some hope for a Shield with a newer Nvidia Orin chip, possibly after the next Nintendo console launches since Nvidia supplies those chips), but as of 2025 nothing confirmed ^{[59] [60]}.

Shield is a niche choice – overkill for someone who just wants Netflix, but a dream for someone who wants to tinker or demands the best in codec support and upscaling. If you have a high-end home theater with local media files or you want to play retro games on your streamer, Shield can do that where others can’t. For an average streaming consumer, Shield’s advantages won’t justify the cost. Devices like Google’s new Chromecast or Apple TV have caught up in speed for general apps. But the Shield remains the “hobbyist’s choice”, with one reviewer calling it “still the king of streaming for those who know how to use it” even in 2025 ^[61] ts2.tech.

Other Notable Mentions

Beyond the big four (Google, Roku, Amazon, Apple) and Nvidia, there are other devices and changes in the market worth mentioning:

• Google TV Partner Devices: Aside from Chromecast and Onn, other brands have released Google/Android TV 4K streamers. e.g., TiVo Stream 4K (came out in 2020 at ~$40) offers a similar Android TV experience with TiVo’s custom guide, though TiVo hasn’t released new hardware since. Xiaomi has a Mi TV Stick 4K (and a new Xiaomi TV Stick 4K (2nd Gen) introduced mid-2025) which is around $50 and runs Google TV ^[62]. These tend to serve international markets more, but it shows the ecosystem has many options. Mecool and others also produce Android/Google TV boxes that cater to niche users (some with tuners, etc.). However, none of these have mainstream retail presence like Chromecast or Onn in the US.
• Smart TVs with Google TV: It’s worth noting many new smart TVs (Sony, TCL, Hisense, etc.) have Google TV built-in. If you have one of those, you essentially have the same interface without needing an external device – though the performance and update frequency of built-in smart TVs can lag behind dedicated streamers. Many enthusiasts still prefer an external box like a Chromecast/Onn/Shield for a faster, more reliable experience and the ability to replace it without changing the whole TV.
• Upcoming Tech – 8K and beyond: Right now, 4K HDR is the standard. Hardly anyone is streaming 8K, and no mainstream 8K streaming device exists (Apple and Nvidia could theoretically output 8K one day, but currently max 4K). We haven’t heard solid rumors of an 8K Chromecast or Apple TV yet – likely because there’s no 8K content streaming demand and HDMI 2.1 (which allows 8K) is only on a few high-end boxes (Roku Ultra got HDMI 2.1 QMS for frame rate, not for 8K). So in terms of future-proofing, a good 4K streamer will serve you well for years; 8K streaming is not on the immediate horizon in 2025, and any talk of new models (Apple’s rumored device, etc.) is focused on faster performance rather than higher resolution.
• User Privacy & Ads: A quick note: different devices have different approaches to ads and tracking. Roku, Amazon, and even Google’s interface have ads or promoted content. Apple and Nvidia (Shield) are the outliers with ad-free home screens. All platforms allow some level of opting out of personalized ads. If having a clean interface free of commercial suggestions is a priority, Apple TV or maybe Shield are worth considering despite their cost.

Conclusion

Chromecast with Google TV vs. Walmart’s Onn Google TV 4K Plus ultimately comes down to what you value in a streaming device. The Onn 4K Plus has proven to be a giant killer in the budget range, delivering the full 4K Google TV experience and even outperforming more expensive players in speed – all for around thirty bucks. It’s an easy recommendation for casual viewers, secondary TVs, or anyone looking to cut costs without sacrificing quality. As one reviewer aptly said, “The no-frills Onn 4K Plus fills the gap left by the Chromecast…and all for only $30.” ^[63] It is, in many ways, the spiritual successor to Google’s own affordable Chromecast dongle.

Google’s Chromecast with Google TV (latest model), on the other hand, aims to be more than just a streamer. It’s a premium hub for your living room – combining a fast streamer, a smart home center, and Google’s newest software tricks in one device. It solves the old Chromecast’s weaknesses (more storage, better remote, faster UI) and adds new capabilities like the Thread/Matter hub and AI features. For tech enthusiasts or those deeply integrated with Google’s ecosystem, it justifies its higher price by offering a more complete package. It’s competing head-to-head with high-end options like Roku Ultra, Fire TV Cube, and Apple TV 4K – and holding its own ts2.tech.

In the broader market of 2025, there is no one-size-fits-all best streamer. Each has its niche:

• Onn 4K Plus – Best ultra-budget choice with shockingly good performance for ~$30 ^[64]. Great for Google ecosystem on a shoestring budget.
• Google TV Streamer (Chromecast) – Best for a Google-centric smart home and those who want a premium Google experience (willing to pay for extra features and future updates).
• Roku – Best for straightforward ease of use and platform neutrality; great for less tech-savvy users who just want to stream without bells and whistles.
• Amazon Fire TV – Best for Alexa users or Amazon Prime loyalists; lots of power per dollar, but heavier on ads and self-promotion in the interface.
• Apple TV 4K – Best for Apple ecosystem devotees or anyone who wants a high-end, ad-free, polished experience (and doesn’t mind the higher price).
• Nvidia Shield TV – Best for enthusiasts and gamers who want maximum format support, emulation, and tinkering; still excellent but aging hardware.

As of late 2025, we see incremental improvements in this space: faster processors, better wireless connectivity, and more integration with smart home platforms. New Roku sticks, rumors of an upgraded Apple TV, and continuous software updates mean the devices are only getting more capable. Yet, for purely streaming movies and shows, even the cheapest devices like the Onn 4K Plus are superb.

If you’re trying to choose between Google’s official Chromecast with Google TV and a third-party Google TV box like the Onn, ask yourself: Do I want the extras, or just the essentials? The essentials (4K streaming, Dolby Vision/Atmos, Google Assistant, Chromecast casting, all the apps) are present in both. The extras (more storage, Ethernet, smart home hub, premium remote features) come with the $99 Chromecast. Neither choice is wrong – it’s about matching your streamer to your needs and budget.

The good news is that Google TV as a platform is thriving, and you have options at every price. Whether you go for the feature-packed Chromecast or the frugal Onn (or even a rival like Roku or Fire Stick), you’ll be able to enjoy all the content the streaming world offers in beautiful 4K. In this golden age of streaming gadgets, even the underdog devices pack a punch – and 2025’s Onn vs Chromecast showdown proves that sometimes the biggest surprises come in the smallest (and cheapest) packages. Happy streaming!

Sources: Reputable tech reviews and news outlets were used in compiling this comparison, including Android Authority ^{[65] [66]}, NotebookCheck ^{[67] [68]}, Tom’s Guide ^[69] ts2.tech, The Verge ts2.tech, Cord Cutters News ^{[70] [71]}, Android Police ^[72], and Google’s own feature announcements ts2.tech ts2.tech, among others. Each device’s specs, performance, and features have been cross-verified with these sources to ensure accuracy and a current (2025) perspective.

References

1. www.notebookcheck.net, 2. www.notebookcheck.net, 3. www.androidauthority.com, 4. www.notebookcheck.net, 5. www.androidauthority.com, 6. www.notebookcheck.net, 7. cordcuttersnews.com, 8. cordcuttersnews.com, 9. www.reddit.com, 10. www.reddit.com, 11. www.androidauthority.com, 12. www.reddit.com, 13. www.androidauthority.com, 14. www.androidauthority.com, 15. www.androidauthority.com, 16. cordcuttersnews.com, 17. www.androidauthority.com, 18. www.androidauthority.com, 19. www.androidauthority.com, 20. www.androidauthority.com, 21. www.notebookcheck.net, 22. www.notebookcheck.net, 23. www.notebookcheck.net, 24. www.androidauthority.com, 25. www.androidauthority.com, 26. www.androidauthority.com, 27. www.androidauthority.com, 28. www.notebookcheck.net, 29. www.androidauthority.com, 30. cordcuttersnews.com, 31. www.androidauthority.com, 32. www.reddit.com, 33. www.androidauthority.com, 34. www.androidpolice.com, 35. www.androidauthority.com, 36. cordcuttersnews.com, 37. cordcuttersnews.com, 38. www.androidauthority.com, 39. www.reddit.com, 40. cordcuttersnews.com, 41. cordcuttersnews.com, 42. cordcuttersnews.com, 43. www.reddit.com, 44. www.androidauthority.com, 45. cordcuttersnews.com, 46. cordcuttersnews.com, 47. cordcuttersnews.com, 48. cordcuttersnews.com, 49. www.androidauthority.com, 50. www.notebookcheck.net, 51. www.notebookcheck.net, 52. www.tomsguide.com, 53. www.tomsguide.com, 54. www.tomsguide.com, 55. www.androidauthority.com, 56. www.androidauthority.com, 57. www.androidauthority.com, 58. www.androidauthority.com, 59. www.nvidia.com, 60. archimago.blogspot.com, 61. www.youtube.com, 62. www.notebookcheck.net, 63. www.androidauthority.com, 64. www.notebookcheck.net, 65. www.androidauthority.com, 66. www.androidauthority.com, 67. www.notebookcheck.net, 68. www.notebookcheck.net, 69. www.tomsguide.com, 70. cordcuttersnews.com, 71. cordcuttersnews.com, 72. www.androidauthority.com