Fitbit Charge 6 vs Garmin Venu Sq 2 vs Xiaomi Smart Band 8 Pro: Ultimate Fitness Tracker Showdown 2025

Key Facts

• Fitbit Charge 6 – Latest Fitbit tracker (now under Google), adding ECG, stress (EDA) sensor, and Google apps (Maps, Wallet, YouTube Music) in a slim band. Launch price: ~$159 USD (often on sale for ~$120). Battery: ~7 days per chargetechradar.com.
• Garmin Venu Sq 2 – Garmin’s entry-level GPS smartwatch with a bright 1.4″ AMOLED display, 11-day battery, and improved accuracy over its predecessorandroidauthority.com. Price: ~$249 USD at launch. Verge Rating: 8/10 (noted as “one of the best fitness watches under $300”).
• Xiaomi Smart Band 8 Pro – Budget-friendly tracker blurring line with smartwatches via a large 1.74″ screen and built-in GPS. Price: ~£60/€80 (≈$79). Battery: up to 14 days (5–6 days with heavy use). TechAdvisor Verdict: “Not the most accurate tracker… but good enough for most people at a price that’s hard to beat.”techadvisor.com

Hardware & Design

Each device has a distinct form factor and build:

• Fitbit Charge 6: A slim, lightweight band with a 1.0″-class AMOLED touchscreen (color, always-on option). It looks nearly identical to the Charge 5, now featuring a new side button – though it’s a haptic “pseudo-button” rather than a physical clicky button. The case is aluminum with a glass front, and it’s 5ATM water-resistant for swimstechradar.com. Weighing ~30–38g including straptechradar.com, it’s comfortable and unobtrusive for 24/7 wear. The band is replaceable, and Fitbit offers colors like Coral (with Champagne Gold aluminum). Overall, the Charge 6 feels sturdy and sleek for a tracker, though the haptic side button can be tricky to press with one hand and might disappoint those who prefer real buttons.
• Garmin Venu Sq 2: A square-faced smartwatch-style tracker with a 40mm polymer case and aluminum bezel. It strongly resembles an Apple Watch in shape (even prompting some to mistake it at a glance), but it’s thinner (11mm) and very light at ~38g. Users report it wears comfortably even on petite wrists, with a smooth silicone 20mm strap that’s easy to swap. Garmin uses Corning Gorilla Glass 3 on the 1.41″ AMOLED display for scratch protection. It’s also 5ATM water-rated, suitable for swimming. The device has two physical side buttons for navigation (useful during workouts or with gloves on). Build quality is solid for the price – “plastic, but chic” thanks to the metal bezel and sleek design. Overall, the Venu Sq 2 strikes a nice balance: a larger watch-like form (for those who prefer a watch look) yet remains lightweight and comfortable for all-day wear.
• Xiaomi Smart Band 8 Pro: A “big screen” fitness band that bridges the gap between band and smartwatch. It features a 1.74″ rectangular AMOLED display set in a surprisingly premium metal chassis (aluminum alloy frame) with no physical buttons. Despite the large screen, the device is compact (≈46×33×10mm) and very light at 22.5g (without strap). It uses a pin-and-hole strap mechanism; while secure, some find this strap fiddly to fasten due to the grippy TPU material. The Smart Band 8 Pro is also 5ATM water-resistant for swims and has a durable Gorilla Glass 3 front to protect that big display. Available in light grey (with a silver-toned frame) or black, it can look surprisingly refined – TechAdvisor noted the light model’s metal frame “looks more premium”. In terms of comfort, it sits flat and low-profile on the wrist and fits a wide range of wrist sizes with various strap options. The larger form factor makes it feel closer to a smartwatch on the wrist, albeit in a slim package.

Durability: All three trackers are built for everyday wear. Each is water-resistant to 50m, suitable for showering and swimming (just avoid hot tubs/saunas). The use of aluminum and hardened glass in the Fitbit and Xiaomi, and Gorilla Glass in the Garmin, means they can handle bumps and scratches reasonably well. However, a dedicated sports watch (often with stainless steel or higher-grade materials) might survive harsher abuse better. Still, in normal use, these devices are durable enough. Bands/straps are replaceable on all three, so you can swap styles or replace a worn strap easily.

Comfort: All models are designed to be worn day and night. The Fitbit’s slim profile is especially unobtrusive for sleep tracking. Garmin’s slightly larger watch shape is still quite light; The Verge’s reviewer noted she didn’t feel the need to rip it off at night – a good sign for comfort. Xiaomi’s Band 8 Pro, despite the big screen, remains lightweight; just ensure the strap is well-fitted (once fastened, it’s comfortable under sleeves). None of these trackers are overly bulky, making them suitable for workouts and sleep, but individual comfort may vary based on wrist size and strap preference.

Display Quality

All three devices use vibrant color displays, but there are differences in size and clarity:

• Fitbit Charge 6: Features a bright AMOLED touchscreen, roughly 1.04″ diagonal (OLED). It’s crisp and easy to view even in sunny conditions, according to Android Authority. The resolution is sharp for its size, giving text and stats good clarity. The Charge 6 introduced an always-on display mode (optional)— convenient for at-a-glance time and stats, though it will reduce battery life. The screen is small compared to the other two, given the Charge’s slim band format, which means limited space for content. Still, the UI is designed with large icons and swipe gestures so you can navigate effectively on the tiny screen. If you prefer a subtle tracker, the Charge’s display is sufficient; just don’t expect to read long messages or view big graphs on it.
• Garmin Venu Sq 2: Upgraded to a 1.4-inch AMOLED (360×320 pixels) – a huge leap over the original Venu Sq’s LCD. Reviewers praise it as “bright, beautiful, and simply what you expect from a quality smartwatch”, easily visible even under direct sun and strikingly vibrant indoors. The display has an always-on option as well (off by default to save power, but there when you want it). The larger screen and high resolution make the Venu Sq 2 great for reading notifications, detailed fitness data, and animated graphics (like workout animations or watch faces). In fact, many comment it “looks like an Apple Watch” due to the bright square display – a compliment to its quality. Touch response is smooth, and you also have two buttons to aid navigation. Overall, the Garmin’s display offers the best readability and color richness among these three, which enhances its smartwatch-like feel.
• Xiaomi Smart Band 8 Pro: Sports the largest display here at 1.74″ AMOLED (336×480 resolution, ~336 ppi). This big, high-resolution screen is a highlight – “excellent display” quality for the price. It’s bright, colorful, and allows Xiaomi to use multi-column layouts; for example, the Band 8 Pro can show app icons in a grid of three, rather than a single long list, leveraging the broad screen. Like the others, it supports always-on mode (with a battery hit). The screen-to-body ratio is high, with slim bezels, making it feel like a small smartwatch on your wrist. This larger display is ideal for showing more data at once – whether it’s a detailed watch face, a text notification, or fitness stats. The downside is, being a budget device, its auto-brightness and outdoor visibility, while generally good, might not match the Garmin’s polish. Still, reviewers are impressed: TechAdvisor called it “a great display”, and it’s definitely easier to read than most traditional skinny bands.

In summary, Garmin’s Venu Sq 2 and Xiaomi’s Band 8 Pro offer much roomier, watch-like screens, whereas the Fitbit Charge 6’s smaller display trades size for a sleeker profile. If you value having more on-screen info (and easier readability), Garmin and Xiaomi have the edge. But if you prefer a discreet tracker, the Fitbit’s screen, while small, is vibrant and does the job for quick stats.

Fitness Tracking Accuracy & Sensors

All three trackers cover the basics – heart rate, step counting, sleep tracking, etc. – but they differ in sensor arrays and accuracy, especially for advanced metrics:

• Heart Rate Monitoring: Each device has an optical heart-rate sensor for continuous monitoring. The Fitbit Charge 6 uses an updated sensor with improved algorithms, claiming “Fitbit’s most accurate heart rate on a tracker yet, up to 60% more accurate during vigorous activities like HIIT.”. In practice, Fitbit’s HR accuracy is good for steady exercises and daily tracking. The Verge’s tests found heart rate readings on the Charge 6 were “on par” with an Apple Watch Ultra 2 and Polar chest strap, only lagging a bit during sudden pace changes. Garmin Venu Sq 2 features Garmin’s Elevate Gen4 sensor (an upgrade over prior models). Garmin’s HR tracking is generally reliable, especially for running and cycling; Android Authority noted the Venu Sq 2’s “improved heart rate accuracy” over the originalandroidauthority.com. It can still struggle during high-intensity interval spikes (optical sensors typically do), but it’s on par with other quality sport watches. Xiaomi Band 8 Pro also continuously measures HR and even blood oxygen (SpO₂). However, multiple reviews temper expectations: “It’s not the most accurate tracker available” in terms of precisiontechadvisor.com. For everyday use and casual workouts, Xiaomi’s HR readings are fine (generally within a reasonable range), but they may not react as fast or as accurately during intense training compared to Fitbit or Garmin. In short, Fitbit and Garmin invest heavily in algorithm accuracy – Fitbit leveraging Google’s AI for better tracking, Garmin leveraging its sports heritage – whereas Xiaomi provides good-enough readings for the average user at a budget price.
• GPS & Workout Tracking: This is a key differentiator. Garmin Venu Sq 2 has built-in multi-GNSS GPS that is praised as accurateandroidauthority.com. It locks on reasonably fast and tracks distance precisely for outdoor runs/rides – Garmin is known for solid GPS, and the Venu Sq 2 lives up to that, matching distances closely with dedicated running watches. The Fitbit Charge 6 also has built-in GPS, a step up from older Fitbits that needed your phone. However, Fitbit’s GPS can be flaky: TechRadar found “severely flaky GPS” performance – if the strap is too tight (to optimize HR), the GPS signal may drop, yet a looser fit worsens HR accuracy. This seems to be a design quirk of the Charge 6 antenna placement. In practice, if you carry your phone, the Charge 6 can use Connected GPS from the phone as a backup. But serious runners might be frustrated using the Charge 6 standalone for distance tracking. The Verge also noted the Charge 6 tended to over-report run distances by ~0.1 mile per 3 miles compared to more precise dual-frequency GPS devices and that it can take a bit longer to latch onto a GPS signal. Xiaomi Smart Band 8 Pro has integrated GPS/GNSS as well, a standout feature at this price. It lets you record runs, bike rides, etc., without your phone – even offering route maps and “replay” animations of your workout path in the app. Accuracy-wise, user feedback and reviews suggest the Band 8 Pro’s GPS is decent but not class-leading. It will track your route, but small discrepancies in distance or occasional slow lock-ons can occur. For casual jogging and navigation, it’s a great inclusion (many budget bands lack GPS entirely), but marathon trainers might find it a bit less reliable than a Garmin.
• Advanced Health Sensors: Fitbit Charge 6 is packed with advanced sensors uncommon in basic trackers. It includes a built-in ECG (electrocardiogram) app for spot-checking heart rhythm (checking for AFib). It also has an EDA sensor (Electrodermal Activity) for stress level measurements (by detecting palm sweat changes) – a unique Fitbit feature. Additionally, Charge 6 tracks skin temperature variation and blood oxygen (SpO₂) at night, plus all-day heart rate variability and resting HR. Garmin Venu Sq 2, while very health-focused, does not have ECG or EDA. (Garmin introduced ECG only in a couple of higher-end models recently, and the Venu Sq 2 wasn’t equipped with that.) It does, however, offer Pulse Ox (SpO₂) monitoring and all the usual suspects: stress tracking (via HRV), body battery (energy level metric), respiration, women’s health tracking, etc., using its optical sensor suite and algorithms. Garmin notably lacks a skin temperature sensor. Xiaomi Smart Band 8 Pro covers a lot considering its cost: continuous heart rate, SpO₂ spot checks, stress monitoring (likely via HRV trends), and even menstrual cycle tracking and a basic “vitality” score. It does not have ECG or advanced stress sensors. Some Xiaomi devices have had skin temperature sensors, but there’s no indication the Band 8 Pro includes one – it focuses on the core metrics.
• Sleep Tracking: All three do sleep tracking (stages like deep, light, REM). Fitbit is often lauded for sleep accuracy and insights. In fact, Fitbit’s sleep tracking is considered among the most reliable – TechRadar noted the Charge 6’s sleep tracking “reliability is above average”. You also get a Sleep Score each morning and snore detection (with Premium). Garmin has improved its sleep tracking; the Venu Sq 2 gives a sleep score and graphs, and it’s fairly good, though some users find Fitbit a bit more consistent in identifying sleep cycles. Xiaomi’s Band 8 Pro now also provides detailed sleep breakdowns, and one reviewer was impressed: “my sleep was actually tracked carefully and differentiated… even my multiple bathroom trips were logged”, which previous Xiaomi bands sometimes missed. So Xiaomi has stepped up its game in sleep tracking accuracy, likely closing the gap with the more established players.
• Other Fitness Metrics: Garmin stands out for sport-specific features – the Venu Sq 2 has around 25+ exercise modes (with basics like running, cycling, yoga, strength, etc.) and even offers structured workouts, Garmin Coach training plans, and fitness age metrics. It lacks an altimeter, so it cannot count floors climbed (stair tracking) – something to note if you care about that stat. Fitbit Charge 6 supports 40+ exercise modes on-wrist now and can auto-detect exercises; it also introduced Bluetooth heart-rate broadcast, allowing the Charge 6 to feed live HR data to gym equipment or apps – “see your heart rate on exercise machines” like treadmills. That’s a neat feature if you use gym cardio machines. Xiaomi boasts 150+ sport modes, an eye-popping number, but many are niche activities with basic tracking. It also has some fun extras like a “AI running coach” and 3D animated warm-ups for certain workouts. These are more motivational gimmicks, but nice to have. Xiaomi and Fitbit both lack altimeters as well (so no floor counts on Band 8 Pro, and Charge 6 also has “no altimeter” listed as a con). All devices have optical SpO₂ sensors for blood oxygen; Fitbit and Garmin tend to log nighttime SpO₂ or let you spot-check, while Xiaomi does on-demand SpO₂ checks.

Overall Accuracy: In general, Garmin’s reputation for accuracy is strong in GPS and good in heart rate, making the Venu Sq 2 a solid choice if you’re serious about outdoor workouts and want trustier metrics. Fitbit Charge 6 has superb health tracking breadth (ECG, etc.) and fine accuracy for general use, but its GPS issue undercuts its reliability for hardcore runners. For most casual to intermediate users, it tracks well – and Fitbit’s algorithms for things like sleep and daily readiness are top-notch – just know it’s not a dedicated sports watch. Xiaomi Smart Band 8 Pro offers a lot of data for the money, and while it may not achieve the same accuracy levels as Fitbit or Garmin on every metric, it’s “good enough for most people” who are doing daily step counts, basic workouts, and general health monitoringtechadvisor.com. All three will count your steps, calories, distance, and active minutes fairly accurately for casual use; differences emerge at the extremes (intense training, needing medical-grade precision, etc.). None of these are medical devices, and as one reviewer quipped, even the best wearables mix real measurement with a bit of “guesstimate” – but they’re invaluable for trend-tracking and motivation.

Smartwatch Features

Beyond fitness, how do these devices act like a “smartwatch”? Here’s what each offers in terms of smart features:

• Fitbit Charge 6: Fitbit has traditionally been more about fitness, but the Charge 6 starts to blur into smartwatch territory. Thanks to Google’s ownership, the Charge 6 gets Google Maps (turn-by-turn directions on your wrist) and Google Wallet (NFC contactless payments) integration. This means you can use the Charge 6 to pay at stores via tap-to-pay and see navigation prompts while running or cycling (when linked to your phone’s GPS for Maps). It also features YouTube Music controls – you can play/pause, skip tracks on the YouTube Music app on your phone from the band. These additions prompted Android Authority to note: “Google’s top apps round out the Fitbit Charge 6 and inch the tracker further into smartwatch territory.”androidauthority.com. The Charge 6, like most Fitbits, shows smartphone notifications (texts, calls, app alerts) with vibration. You can quick-reply to texts with preset replies or emojis if you’re on Android (iPhone doesn’t allow third-party replies). It has timers, alarms, weather info, and watch faces you can change in the app. What it lacks: music storage (no onboard music except controlling your phone’s), no speaker or microphone (so you can’t take calls or use a voice assistant on the band), and no third-party apps beyond the built-ins. Fitbit did away with its older app ecosystem for Versa/Sense watches; on the Charge, you’re limited to what’s provided (which now thankfully includes key Google apps). One downside: The music controls only work for YouTube Music specifically – “YouTube Music is the only option and that’s $11 monthly”, as The Verge flagged. So if you use Spotify or others, you can’t control them on the Charge 6 (a pain point for some). Overall, the Charge 6 covers the essentials of a smart band: payments, notifications, music control, and some navigation help – quite robust for a band-style wearable.
• Garmin Venu Sq 2: The Venu Sq 2 is closer to a full smartwatch. It supports smartphone notifications (with the ability to send quick replies if paired to an Android phone). It has Garmin Pay for contactless payments (NFC) – you can load your bank cards and use the watch to pay securely. If you buy the Music edition of the Venu Sq 2, you also get onboard music storage (up to 500 songs) and WiFi – allowing you to download playlists from Spotify, Amazon Music, or Deezer directly to the watch and listen phone-free with Bluetooth headphones. (The base model can control music on your phone but doesn’t hold songs.) Garmin includes a bunch of built-in apps/widgets: weather, calendar view, stopwatch/timer, etc. It also has find my phone and can display calendar appointments (synced from your phone). One standout is Garmin’s Connect IQ app ecosystem – you can install additional watch faces, data fields, and a limited selection of apps (like fitness apps or little utilities) from Garmin’s store. This isn’t as extensive as Apple’s or Google’s app stores, but it’s something Fitbit and Xiaomi don’t really offer. The limitations: The Venu Sq 2 has no microphone or speaker, so no voice assistant, no taking calls on the watch. Also, Garmin’s “smart” features beyond health are somewhat limited – for instance, you can view texts but not images, and interacting with notifications is basic. TechRadar notes these as “limited smartwatch features” in this modelandroidauthority.com. Still, core conveniences like contactless pay and music playback (on the music model) give Garmin a leg up for those who want more independence from their phone during workouts. It’s worth noting Garmin also lacks any voice control or third-party messaging apps – it’s a deliberate trade-off for better battery life and simplicity. In summary, the Venu Sq 2 can handle everyday smart needs and even replace some phone functions on a run (music, payments), making it a true smartwatch alternative at a mid-range price.
• Xiaomi Smart Band 8 Pro: Xiaomi’s device is the most basic in terms of smart features, aligning with its budget nature. It does support notifications for calls, texts, and apps (WhatsApp, etc.), and you get a vibration alert. However, you generally cannot reply to messages from the band (except you can send a quick canned SMS reply or reject for incoming calls). The band has built-in controls for music playback (works with any phone music app playing) and shows weather forecasts, calendar events, and alarms. But there are no third-party apps you can install on the Band 8 Pro – you’re limited to what Xiaomi provides. Unlike in China, the global version of Band 8 Pro has no NFC for paymentstechadvisor.com (the Chinese variant has NFC for transit cards and AliPay/WeChat Pay, but those won’t work internationally). There’s also no voice assistant on the global model (some earlier Mi Bands in China integrated Xiaomi’s Xiao AI assistant, but that isn’t in the global firmware). Essentially, the Smart Band 8 Pro covers the fundamentals: notifications, music control, weather, and some handy features like a remote camera shutter (to snap phone photos), but it doesn’t go much beyond that. TechAdvisor highlighted these drawbacks, saying the Band 8 Pro has downsides like “no NFC” and “can’t reply to messages”, and noting such gaps might “make you think twice” despite its strengthstechadvisor.com. On a positive note, Xiaomi did refine the interface to feel more watch-like: you navigate via swipes and taps on that big screen, and there are widget panels for things like music or daily steps. The lack of any buttons means it’s all touch UI. There’s also no ability to take calls on the band (no microphone or speaker). Considering the price, the feature set is fair – it’s similar to what a basic Fitbit Inspire or older Mi Band would do – just displayed on a nicer screen. If you require on-wrist payments, voice control, or app expansions, the Band 8 Pro will disappoint. But if you mainly need a conduit for phone notifications and some controls, it suffices.

In summary, Garmin’s Venu Sq 2 is the most feature-rich in “smartwatch” terms (especially the Music edition), offering payments, optional music storage, and an app ecosystem. Fitbit’s Charge 6 has made strides by adding Google Wallet and Maps – giving it capabilities previously unseen in a basic Fitbit band – making it quite smart, though it’s still mostly tied to phone connectivity for things like GPS mapping and streaming music control. Xiaomi’s Band 8 Pro delivers the essentials but nothing more, aligning with its budget positioning; it’s great as a simple companion to check messages and track basics, but it won’t replace your phone in any significant way.

App & Ecosystem

The companion apps and ecosystem can greatly affect the user experience for these trackers:

• Fitbit (Google Fitbit) App: Fitbit’s app (available on Android and iOS) is often praised for its user-friendly interface and insightful metrics. It provides an easy-to-understand dashboard of your steps, heart rate, sleep, exercise, etc., and badges for goals. Fitbit also calculates advanced metrics like Daily Readiness Score and Stress Management Score (these require a Fitbit Premium subscription). The Charge 6 benefits from Fitbit’s refined ecosystem – for example, its data contributes to a Wellness Report, and it syncs with popular services like Strava and Google Fit (though Google Fit syncing might be less emphasized now). One caveat: Google’s integration has brought changes. You must use a Google account to log into Fitbit now. The app got a major redesign in 2023, adopting more of Google’s design language. Some longtime Fitbit users were unhappy, as community social features (challenges, leaderboards) were sunsetted in early 2023. So, the once-vibrant Fitbit community challenges are gone, focusing the app more on individual metrics. Still, the app remains robust, with an emphasis on health trends over time. Fitbit Premium ($9.99/month after a free trial) unlocks deeper analysis (like detailed sleep stages history, readiness score, video workouts, etc.). It’s optional, but many advanced features are tied to it. If you don’t subscribe, the Charge 6 will still record all core data; you just might miss some advanced insight and content. Notably, Fitbit’s platform integrates with other Google services – e.g., you can have Fitbit data show up on your Pixel phone’s At-a-Glance or sync to Google Health Connect. Overall, Fitbit’s ecosystem is polished and approachable, ideal for general wellness tracking. However, recent backend issues (server outages in past) and the Google transition bumps have been a slight concern. The good news is Google appears committed to Fitbit’s future (albeit with some shifts in direction), and Charge 6 users get 6 months of Fitbit Premium free to experience the full ecosystem.
• Garmin Connect: Garmin’s ecosystem is geared toward data enthusiasts and athletes. The Garmin Connect app (Android/iOS, and a web interface) offers exhaustive details. Every workout can be pored over with maps, pace splits, heart rate graphs, and even training effect stats. It logs your steps, sleep, stress, calories, Body Battery (energy), and more into calendar and trendlines. You can join Garmin’s community challenges, add friends, and compete on leaderboards (so Garmin retains social features Fitbit has dropped). The flip side of this depth is complexity – The Verge noted Garmin’s app can be “cluttered” for casual users. There are a lot of menus and stats, which can overwhelm someone who just wants the basics. However, Garmin has been improving the UI gradually and even added things like an Insights feed. Importantly, Garmin does not charge subscription fees – you get all features with the device purchase. Your historical data, training metrics, and insights like VO₂ max or fitness age are fully accessible without extra cost. Garmin also has the Connect IQ store where you can download watch faces or mini-apps for the device (via the Garmin Connect or Garmin IQ app). With the Venu Sq 2, you could add, say, a Spotify remote app or a weather glance that’s more detailed, etc. It’s not an app ecosystem comparable to Apple/Google, but it’s a nice bonus for customization. Garmin Connect syncs reliably with third-party services – you can link it to Strava, MyFitnessPal, Google Fit (via Health Connect), and others, so your activities can flow out to other platforms automatically. One specific limitation: if you are on Apple’s ecosystem, Garmin can’t integrate as deeply (e.g., it won’t write to Apple Health unless you use a third-party bridge). But on Android, it works well alongside Google’s health APIs. Another Garmin highlight is Garmin Coach – free training plans for 5K, 10K, half-marathon that send workouts to your watch. This, along with things like Safety/LiveTrack (ability to share your live location during an activity – requires phone connection), shows that Garmin’s ecosystem is very sport-oriented. In summary, Garmin’s app is powerful but can feel complex; if you love diving into fitness data or plan training, it’s fantastic. If you prefer a simple, guided experience, it might feel like “too much” – though you can always ignore the deeper stats and just enjoy that it’s there when you need it.
• Xiaomi Mi Fitness (Xiaomi Wear) App: Xiaomi’s Smart Bands use the Mi Fitness app (formerly sometimes referred to as Xiaomi Wear). It’s an evolving platform that covers all the basics: daily step count, heart rate charts, sleep info, stress, and workout records. The interface is fairly straightforward and has improved in stability in recent years. One useful feature: the app can import data from the Zepp Life app (Zepp Life was the older Mi Fit app by Huami) – “making it seamless to transition from one platform to the other”, according to TechAdvisor. This is handy if you had a previous Mi Band on the older app; you won’t lose your history. The Mi Fitness app allows integration with some third-party services; for example, it can sync workouts to Strava and Apple Health. On Android, it might sync to Google Fit via a toggle (or you may need a third-party tool – this has changed occasionally with app updates). The app provides a watch face gallery for the Band 8 Pro, letting you download new faces (Xiaomi offers a lot of fun designs). You can also adjust band settings, like notifications and health monitoring frequency, through the app. Generally, Xiaomi’s ecosystem is not as in-depth as Fitbit or Garmin – there are no subscription tiers or premium insights (everything is included, which is a plus), but also less analysis. You won’t get a readiness score or detailed stress coaching; you get raw data with basic interpretation. For many, that’s fine. Xiaomi does have occasional community events in the app (in some regions, there are step challenges or medals), but it’s not as established. One thing to note: Xiaomi’s app can sometimes have quirks with language or translation, since it’s a global app originally from China – but it’s largely polished now. As NextPit’s reviewer noted, it hasn’t changed much from previous versions, which is good for continuity but also means “not much development” in adding new features. A common user complaint historically was “app chaos” when Xiaomi had multiple apps (Mi Fitness vs. Zepp Life), but now they’ve mostly unified to Mi Fitness, which the reviewer was “pleased Xiaomi seems to have got… under control.”. In summary, the Mi Fitness app is adequate for casual fitness tracking, giving you the numbers and some nice charts. It just doesn’t offer the level of insight or community that Fitbit or Garmin do. But considering there’s no extra cost and it covers health basics (even including PAI – Personal Activity Intelligence – a heart-health metric Xiaomi borrowed from Huami), it’s quite sufficient for a general audience, especially if you prefer not to sift through too much data.

Ecosystem Bottom Line: Fitbit offers the most guided, user-friendly experience with a focus on health insights (but some features sit behind a subscription). Garmin provides a data-rich, performance-focused platform with no extra fees, great for those who want to deeply engage with their fitness stats. Xiaomi gives a no-frills, no-cost app that delivers the essentials, aligning with its value proposition – it won’t overwhelm, but also won’t coach or analyze as much. All three apps are stable and sync reliably in our experience, but your preference might depend on how much detail vs. simplicity you want in seeing your fitness journey.

Battery Life

Battery endurance is a strong suit for all three devices compared to full-fledged smartwatches, but there are notable differences:

• Fitbit Charge 6: Rated for up to 7 days on a chargetechradar.com. In real-world use, many users see around 5–6 days with normal use (24/7 wear, notifications on, a workout or two, but without always-on display). If you use the always-on display or built-in GPS frequently, expect the battery to drain faster – perhaps 2-3 days with heavy GPS use. Fitbit specifically notes that using the SpO₂ sensor or AOD will require more frequent charging. The good news is, 5-7 days is still much better than a typical smartwatch. It means you only need to charge roughly once a week. The Charge 6 uses a proprietary USB charger (same clip style as Charge 5). Compared to its predecessor: Interestingly, the Charge 6 didn’t dramatically improve battery over Charge 5; instead it maintained a week-long life while adding more features (like more constant heart data and Google Maps). Notably, some recent software updates for Fitbits have affected battery for certain users (as TechRadar reported complaints, some saw drops in longevity after updates). But generally, if used moderately, the Charge 6 should hit close to its week-long claim – which is quite decent given its color screen and constant sensor tracking. Quick tip: turning off always-on display and letting the screen wake on raise can significantly extend life, as can disabling continuous SpO₂ tracking if you don’t need it nightly.
• Garmin Venu Sq 2: A champ in this trio for battery. Garmin advertises about 11 days in smartwatch mode (i.e., daily wear with notifications). Reviewers found it easily lasts over a week; Android Authority lauded its “very impressive battery life”androidauthority.com. With GPS actively tracking, you get up to 26 hours of continuous GPS time – which is plenty for multiple long workouts (or even an ultramarathon). In practice, with mixed usage (some workouts, sleep tracking, notifications), many users go ~8-10 days before needing a charge. Enabling the always-on display will reduce that; Garmin notes it “significantly depletes battery” – you might then get around 3-4 days with AOD enabled full-time. However, its raise-to-wake gesture is very responsive, so most stick with that and enjoy a week plus per charge. The Venu Sq 2 uses Garmin’s standard magnetic cable for charging (same as Venu, Fenix, etc.). An interesting comparison: one TechRadar piece noted the Venu Sq 2 has “around five times the battery life of an Apple Watch SE” – highlighting how efficient it is, largely because it forgoes power-hungry features like cellular or very high-end CPUs. Bottom line: If battery longevity is a priority, Garmin likely wins here; it’s feasible to take it on a 10-day trip without the charger. The only caution is if you hammer GPS daily for hours, you’ll charge more often – but even then, it fares better than the Fitbit for heavy GPS users (Fitbit’s smaller battery might last about 5 hours of GPS on Charge 6, whereas Garmin can go 20+ hours).
• Xiaomi Smart Band 8 Pro: Advertised at up to 14 days typical use, which is optimistic. Real-world tests put it at about 5-7 days under typical “all features on” usage. TechAdvisor’s review noted “battery life is good, around five days with tracking features enabled.” This means continuous heart rate, sleep tracking, and some GPS workouts in that span. If you were more conservative – say, turning off the always-on display (which can halve the life to about 6 days from 12) or not using GPS frequently – you might stretch close to 10 days. Conversely, if you use GPS often, each hour of GPS will cut a chunk out (the band’s smaller battery (~289 mAh) can probably sustain maybe 8-10 hours of GPS total). Xiaomi claims 6 days with always-on mode on, which aligns with reports. Still, for its class, a nearly week-long life is commendable. It’s certainly far above what any Apple or WearOS watch gets, and a bit better than most Fitbit watches. The Band 8 Pro charges via a magnetic pogo-pin cable, taking roughly 1.5 hours for a full charge. Another factor is notifications and vibrations: Xiaomi’s vibration motor is noted to be a bit strong with limited adjustment, which might impact battery slightly if you get a ton of notifications (though mostly it’s just an annoyance that you can’t lower intensity). One should also note that battery longevity will decline somewhat over time – after a year or two, you might see a day less, which applies to all devices.

In comparing, Garmin’s Venu Sq 2 clearly stands out for stamina, especially for multi-day activities or simply not worrying about frequent charging. Fitbit Charge 6 is solid, a full week for a feature-rich tracker is nothing to scoff at – it’s on par with prior Charges and better than many Color screen trackers from other brands. Xiaomi’s Band 8 Pro, despite a high official spec, in practice gives about a work week of use, which is still very good given its large bright display and constant tracking (and it beats many older Mi Bands which, once you used all features, often lasted under a week too).

All three will comfortably get through at least multiple days of continuous use, making them reliable for sleep tracking nightly without daily charging. If you hate charging devices, Garmin will please you the most. If you’re okay with a weekly top-up, any of them will do. And unlike a smartwatch that you might need to charge daily or every other day, these trackers let you focus more on wearing them than charging them.

Price, Availability, and Value for Money

Each of these trackers hits a different price bracket, and value for money is where Xiaomi aims to excel, Fitbit aims to justify with features, and Garmin aims to earn with performance. Let’s break it down:

• Fitbit Charge 6: Launch MSRP: $159.99 / £139.99 / €159 (approximately). This was actually $20 cheaper than the Charge 5’s debut, which was a pleasant surprise in late 2023. Since launch, Fitbit devices often go on sale: it’s not uncommon to find the Charge 6 around $130 or even $120 (as The Verge noted during sales). At ~$150, the Charge 6 is in the midrange for fitness wearables – costlier than basic bands, but less than smartwatches. Value proposition: You’re paying for Fitbit’s renowned ease of use and the robust set of health sensors (ECG, EDA, etc. are rare at this price). In some ways, the Charge 6 offers features that usually come in $300+ smartwatches (ECG, contactless pay, etc.) but in a cheaper, simpler form. However, its issues (GPS quirks, no altimeter) mean if you specifically want flawless running tracking, your money might be better spent on a Garmin. And remember the Fitbit Premium angle – after 6 months, to keep getting certain advanced metrics and content, you’d be paying $10/month, which adds to long-term cost. Without Premium, it’s still fully functional for core tracking, though. Overall, the Charge 6 is great value for a casual health-focused user: it’s like a budget alternative to high-end Fitbit Sense 2 (which was ~$300) because it gives you most of the health features that even Fitbit’s smartwatches had. TechRadar gave the Charge 6 a Value score of 4/5, acknowledging it as “one of the best-value picks in the Fitbit lineup, if you can live with its issues.”. If you’re primarily after motivation to be active, good sleep insights, and seamless integration (especially if you use other Google services), the Charge 6 offers a lot for the money. Just note that for the same $160, there are smartwatches (on sale) that could offer bigger screens and more smartwatch functionality – but likely without the depth of health sensors Fitbit has. So it’s a trade-off: pay midrange price, get cutting-edge health tracking in a discrete band, but accept a few compromises in raw performance (GPS) and the expectation of a subscription for full effect.
• Garmin Venu Sq 2: Launch MSRP: $249.99 (base) / $299.99 (Music edition). In the time since late 2022, the Venu Sq 2 has seen price drops – often available around $199 on Amazon for the base model, and sometimes $229 for Music. It’s widely available through Garmin, Amazon, Best Buy, etc., and as of 2025, it remains in Garmin’s lineup (no immediate successor yet). Value assessment: At full price, it was a bit higher than similar Fitbit or Apple’s entry watch (SE) at the time, but it justified that with its battery life and sports accuracy. “Garmin overhauls its entry device… if you’re looking for an entry-level Garmin GPS smartwatch, this may be the buy – just be ready to fork over a bit more cash than before,” said Android Authorityandroidauthority.comandroidauthority.com. The Verge flat-out called it “one of the best fitness watches you can buy for under $300”. For around $200 now, the Venu Sq 2 is a strong value for someone serious about fitness tracking who also wants smartwatch conveniences. You get full GPS, excellent battery, and the credibility of Garmin’s analytics without a subscription. The drawbacks for value: It doesn’t have some bells and whistles like an altimeter or phone call ability, and at $250 (if not on sale) it edged into territory of more advanced watches. However, Garmin’s lineup above it (Venu 2, Forerunner series) costs more like $350+, so the Venu Sq 2 still undercuts those while delivering 90% of their features. Compared to Fitbit, you pay more upfront, but then no ongoing fees and arguably more durable hardware. Compared to Xiaomi, it’s 3-4 times the price – but you are absolutely getting a more premium build and far more refined software. If your budget allows, the Garmin offers a “buy it for the long haul” vibe – these devices often last for many years. And it’s backed by Garmin’s support and ecosystem, which is important for value longevity. For budget-sensitive buyers, $250 might be steep for a tracker; but for those weighing an Apple Watch or Pixel Watch, $250 is actually budget-friendly, and here you won’t have to charge daily. So, value is relative: For fitness enthusiasts, the Venu Sq 2’s value is high because of its performance and lack of hidden costs. It’s often recommended as a top midrange fitness watch, giving Fitbit’s watches a run for their money in that segment.
• Xiaomi Smart Band 8 Pro: Price: £59.99 / €79.99 (when it launched in Europe in early 2024). In China it was 399 Yuan (~$55). In other markets, if available, it tends to hover around $70-80 USD import. The Band 8 Pro initially wasn’t sold widely in the US (Xiaomi doesn’t officially sell wearables in the U.S.), but one can import it or find it on Amazon via third-party sellers. It’s officially sold in parts of Asia and Europe. Value for money: simply put, it’s excellent. You are getting a device with a large AMOLED, built-in GPS, heart rate & SpO₂, and tons of features at a fraction of the cost of the other two. NextPit’s reviewer even said the low price “proved me wrong” in doubting it, and rated it four stars largely because “the Smart Band 8 Pro costs just $79”, delivering a clear bang-for-buck. The big question is, what are you sacrificing for that low price? Primarily: top-tier accuracy (it’s decent but not the best), any form of advanced sensors (no ECG/EDA, etc.), and the rich ecosystem or polish of Fitbit/Garmin. Also, build materials are a slight step down (though the metal frame is impressive at this price, it’s not the same ruggedness as more expensive watches). But for someone who wants core fitness tracking and a smartwatch-like display on a budget, Xiaomi absolutely nails it. It’s even cheaper than some less-capable Fitbits (e.g., the Fitbit Inspire 3 was around $100). The value calculus is: for under $80, you get about “80%” of what the $150-$250 devices do (perhaps even more, depending on features you care about). That said, support and longevity might be considerations – Xiaomi refreshes bands yearly, and while they do offer firmware updates, it’s not clear if the Band 8 Pro will get multi-year support. Garmin and Fitbit devices might get more years of software support. Still, at this price, one could replace the Xiaomi band every 1-2 years and still spend less than a single midrange tracker. TechAdvisor summarized it well: “it delivers decent bang for the buck”, and its downsides (no NFC, no replies) are small trade-offs if your main needs are fitness basics and notifications. In markets where Xiaomi is available, it undercuts almost all competitors for feature-to-price ratio.

Availability:

• The Fitbit Charge 6 is broadly available in North America, Europe, etc., via Google’s store, Amazon, and electronics retailers. After Google’s rebranding, you might even see it referred to as “Google Fitbit Charge 6”. It launched in October 2023 and is the current model (as of 2025) in Fitbit’s tracker lineup.
• The Garmin Venu Sq 2 has been out since late 2022, available globally through Garmin and retailers. With Garmin releasing newer models in other lines (like Venu 3, Venu X1 in 2025), the Venu Sq 2 sometimes sees discounts and remains a popular midrange choice. No direct successor (Venu Sq 3) has been announced as of 2025, so it’s still the latest of the Sq series.
• The Xiaomi Smart Band 8 Pro was initially China-only (Aug 2023) but got a global release by early 2024 in select regions (e.g., Europe, SE Asia). It can be purchased through Xiaomi’s official online stores in those regions or via import. One note: ensure you buy the Global Version if you’re outside China, so that you have English language by default and no Chinese-only features. The pricing mentioned (£60/€80) is for the official global variant. If importing to the US, prices may vary slightly.

Overall Value Comparison: It often boils down to you get what you pay for, but here each of these punches above its weight in some area:

• The Xiaomi Band 8 Pro provides incredible value in features per dollar – ideal if you want the cheapest solution that covers the basics very well. It’s perfect for students, budget-conscious buyers, or as a first fitness tracker to dip your toes in.
• The Fitbit Charge 6, at a mid-tier price, gives you high-end health features (ECG, etc.) that often cost much more elsewhere, plus a very refined app experience. It’s great value for someone who wants serious health tracking and Google integration without paying smartwatch prices – provided you aren’t aiming for hardcore GPS sport usage. It’s like the best “casual fitness” value.
• The Garmin Venu Sq 2, though highest in price here, gives you premium smartwatch capabilities and accuracy at still less than premium watches. For an enthusiast or someone debating between a $400 Garmin and this $250 model, the Sq 2 is excellent value. You invest more upfront but you get a device that can go toe-to-toe in many ways with higher-end gear and likely last you many years.

In sum, all three offer strong value within their niches: The Verge called Garmin’s a great Fitbit alternative, TechRadar enjoyed the Charge 6 but flagged its flaws for certain users, and multiple reviewers applaud Xiaomi for bringing features to a price point previously unheard of. Your personal value equation should consider not just sticker price, but what features you truly need and will use.

Latest News & Upcoming Models

It’s always wise to consider the product roadmap – here’s the latest on each brand, to future-proof your decision:

• Fitbit/Google: Google has signaled a shift in Fitbit’s strategy. In fact, in 2023 it was announced that Fitbit would no longer make new smartwatches (like the Sense or Versa series), focusing instead on fitness bands, while Google’s Pixel Watch line covers the smartwatch segment. This means the Charge series is now Fitbit’s flagship wearable line. The Charge 6 is the current model (late 2023); as of 2025, no Charge 7 has been officially announced yet. There have been rumors that a Charge 7 could appear possibly in late 2024 or 2025, perhaps with a larger display or more Google integration, but nothing concrete. If you’re considering waiting: given Fitbit’s historical 2-year cycle on Charges (Charge 5 in 2021, Charge 6 in 2023), a Charge 7 might not arrive until late 2025 if they follow pattern – and it’s not guaranteed. Google seems more focused on integration and software updates for now. One recent development (August 2025) was news that Fitbit devices will require migration to Google accounts and increased synergy with Google Fit/Pixel – something to be aware of as the ecosystem evolves (existing users have until 2025 to migrate accounts). In short, the Charge 6 will remain a top-of-the-line tracker for Fitbit for the foreseeable future, and no immediate replacement is on the market at this time. The Fitbit Inspire 3 is a more basic model below it, and the Pixel Watch 2 (launched late 2024) is an option if you want full smartwatch features – but that’s a different category. Long-term outlook: Fitbit will likely continue adding features via updates (e.g., new watch faces or minor feature drops – an update in early 2024 added more data-rich watch faces to the Charge 6). If a Charge 7 comes, expect incremental upgrades: possibly a larger screen, maybe new sensors like ECG improvements or finally re-adding an altimeter, but the core experience will be similar.
• Garmin: Garmin’s lineup is ever-expanding. For the Venu series, Garmin launched the Venu 3 (round watch) in Sept 2023 with features like on-watch sleep coaching and even nap tracking. They also surprised everyone with a new model in 2025 named Garmin Venu X1, which has a 2″ AMOLED display and ultra-thin design – clearly aimed at competing with Apple Watch aesthetics. The Venu X1 is more premium ($400+) and offers features like a flashlight, phone calls, etc., so it’s in a different tier than the Venu Sq 2. As for the Venu Sq series, no official Venu Sq 3 has been released as of September 2025. Enthusiast forums speculate it could launch eventually (perhaps if following a 2-year cadence, it might’ve been expected in late 2024, but that didn’t happen). It’s possible Garmin might release a Sq 3 in 2025 with new features or design, but currently there are no leaks of an imminent Venu Sq 3. The Venu Sq 2 remains a solid choice and still fairly current. If anything, Garmin might be letting the X1 serve as the “square” offering for now (though at a higher price bracket). Elsewhere in Garmin’s range, they’ve released new Forerunner models and a Fenix 8 is on the horizon. But for a general audience, the Venu Sq 2 is still the key affordable Garmin smartwatch. Garmin typically doesn’t discontinue a model until its successor is ready, so the Sq 2 should remain available. When the Sq 3 eventually comes, expect possible upgrades like an even larger screen or maybe a microphone for phone calls (just speculation). Garmin’s strength is gradual improvement, so a future model might add what was lacking (perhaps altimeter or multi-band GPS). In summary, nothing imminent should dissuade you from the Venu Sq 2 now, unless you’re the type who always wants the latest – in which case keep an eye on Garmin around their fall product announcements. Also worth noting: Garmin’s frequent firmware updates can add features to existing watches; e.g., they sometimes trickle down features from higher models. So your Venu Sq 2 might even get software improvements over time (it has in the past gotten minor feature adds).
• Xiaomi: Xiaomi refreshes its Mi Band (Smart Band) line annually. After the Smart Band 8 Pro (2023), Xiaomi released the standard Smart Band 9 in mid-2024, and later that year introduced two new variants: Smart Band 9 Pro and Smart Band 9 Active in late 2024. This expanded lineup might sound confusing. Essentially, the Band 9 Pro is the successor to the Band 8 Pro – it also has a large AMOLED screen (1.74″) and even adds a larger battery (350 mAh vs 289 mAh) for longer life. It features an aluminum alloy frame and a design that one reviewer said “looks like an Apple Watch” (the Pro kept the premium build). The Band 9 Active is a cheaper variant with a slightly smaller 1.47″ TFT screen and plastic body – aimed to be a budget option below the Pro. Android Authority’s review of these concluded that the 9 Pro is the one to get if choosing between them, as it feels much more polished. The Band 9 Pro launched around $79.99 MSRP – very similar pricing to the 8 Pro – showing Xiaomi’s commitment to value. As of 2025, the Band 9 Pro might start becoming available globally (some European listings popped up around early 2025). So, an upcoming consideration: Xiaomi Smart Band 9 Pro could be worth looking at, as it improves on the 8 Pro with even better battery and some refinements (though fundamentally they are similar, and both have no NFC outside China). Another potential future release to watch would be the Xiaomi Smart Band 10 (if Xiaomi continues the naming). Xiaomi tends to alternate major updates – since Band 9 was more incremental, a Band 10 in 2025 might bring a design overhaul or new features (pure speculation: maybe AMOLED on all models, or added microphone for voice assistant which has been rumored). However, given the rapid cycle, one could always wait – tech moves fast – but the gains year-over-year are usually modest. If you want the latest Xiaomi has to offer in this style, the Band 9 Pro is that (with the caveat it launched in China Dec 2024 and global release may lag a bit). Xiaomi devices are affordable enough that even if you buy the 8 Pro now, upgrading in a year isn’t a huge financial hit, which is part of their charm.

In conclusion, none of these models are obsolete or about to be immediately replaced in a way that diminishes their value drastically. The Fitbit Charge 6 is the newest of the bunch and will remain Fitbit’s top tracker for some time. Garmin Venu Sq 2 is middle-aged in tech terms but still very competitive; Garmin’s recent focus on higher models means the Sq 2 continues to be a strong offering with no direct successor yet – and even if one comes, the Sq 2 won’t suddenly become bad (it would likely drop in price and still be a good buy). Xiaomi’s Band 8 Pro now has a successor (9 Pro), so if you can get the newer one easily, you might consider that; otherwise the 8 Pro still offers 95% of the same functionality for hopefully a discount.

Staying informed: If you’re reading this in late 2025 or beyond, check for any new announcements from each brand. But as of now, these three devices represent some of the best choices in their categories, and any upcoming models will likely build on, rather than revolutionize, what these already do.

Conclusion

All three devices – the Fitbit Charge 6, Garmin Venu Sq 2, and Xiaomi Smart Band 8 Pro – are excellent fitness wearables, but each targets a slightly different user profile:

• Fitbit Charge 6 is the go-to for a holistic health tracker in a sleek band format. It shines in lifestyle metrics (sleep, stress, heart health) and integrates smoothly with your smartphone and Google services. It’s perfect for someone who wants top-notch health tracking and some smartwatch perks (payments, basic apps) in a discreet package. As one reviewer put it, “the Fitbit Charge 6 represents the company’s best fitness tracker”, packing a lot of tech into a small device. It’s best for casual to intermediate fitness folks who prioritize wellness insights and ease of use over hardcore sport features. Just remember, it’s not trying to be a full smartwatch or a marathon trainer – it’s a smart fitness band. And in that role, it’s arguably unmatched, especially now with Google’s enhancements.
• Garmin Venu Sq 2 is the choice for those who want a true sports watch experience at a mid-range price. It has the most robust fitness and GPS performance of the trio, and its battery life is stellar. If you’re an active person – running, gym, biking – and maybe considering a smartwatch, the Venu Sq 2 gives you many smartwatch features without sacrificing fitness accuracy. The Verge called it “an excellent Fitbit alternative” that “easily gives the Fitbit Versa 4 and Sense 2 a run for their money”, even deeming it one of the best sub-$300 fitness watches. Its slightly higher price buys you reliability and depth. It’s ideal for fitness enthusiasts, data lovers, or anyone who values function over flashy form (though it looks good too!). The only people who might not love it are those who want a very small band or extremely simplistic app – because Garmin does give you a lot to chew on. But for value and capability, Venu Sq 2 is a winner.
• Xiaomi Smart Band 8 Pro is the budget champion and a great everyday activity tracker. It offers an incredible feature set for the money – large display, notifications, basic tracking – making fitness tech accessible to almost anyone. It’s for the general public, especially first-timers or casual users, who want to monitor their health and stay connected without spending much. While it doesn’t have advanced sensors or the polish of the other two, it covers all fundamental needs. As TechAdvisor concluded, it “boasts a larger screen and GPS… not the most accurate, but good enough for most and at a price that’s hard to beat.”techadvisor.com For someone who isn’t training for a triathlon and just wants to be more active and informed day-to-day, the Smart Band 8 Pro is fantastic. Also, if you tend to upgrade tech frequently or fear damaging an expensive device, Xiaomi’s low cost reduces that worry.

In the end, the “best” device depends on your priorities:

• Choose Fitbit Charge 6 if you value comprehensive health metrics, user-friendly experience, and a slim form – and you’re okay with mid-range pricing (and possibly a subscription for premium features). It offers arguably the best overall wellness value and fits seamlessly into daily life and sleep.
• Choose Garmin Venu Sq 2 if you want accuracy, durability, and autonomy – it’s the one you can trust on long runs and not charge every night. It provides the best sports value – a true hybrid of smartwatch and fitness watch. And there’s a reason tech reviewers often recommend Garmin to those who find trackers like Fitbit limiting in fitness depthandroidauthority.com.
• Choose Xiaomi Smart Band 8 Pro if your budget is tight or you simply want the biggest bang for the buck. It’s the proof that you don’t need to spend a fortune to get a very capable tracker. It’s the value-for-money king, perfect for step counting, casual exercise, and basic health monitoring, with a display that rivals much pricier devices.

All three will help you get fitter and stay informed about your health. They each offer excellent battery life, comfortable designs, and swim-proof builds. The decision ultimately comes down to whether you’re a Google/Fitbit ecosystem fan, a Garmin fitness devotee, or a savvy spender who knows a deal when they see one.

No matter which you choose, you’ll be getting a competent companion for your fitness journey. Here’s to reaching your goals with the help of some cutting-edge tech on your wrist!

Sources:

• Android Authority – Fitbit Charge 6 Review (K. Cimino)androidauthority.com
• TechRadar – Fitbit Charge 6 review (A. Williams)
• The Verge – Fitbit Charge 6 review: practically a Pixel band (V. Song)
• Android Authority – Garmin Venu Sq 2 review (K. Cimino)androidauthority.com
• The Verge – Garmin Venu Sq 2 review: excellent Fitbit alternative (V. Song)
• TechAdvisor – Xiaomi Smart Band 8 Pro review (M. Casserly)techadvisor.com
• Android Authority – Xiaomi Smart Band 8 Pro launched (H. Simons)
• TechAdvisor – Xiaomi Smart Band 8 Pro review (Pros/Cons)techadvisor.comtechadvisor.com
• NextPit – Xiaomi Smart Band 8 Pro Review (B. Simons)
• Reddit – r/Fitbit rumors (unverified, for context on Charge 7 rumors)
• Garmin (DC Rainmaker) – Venu Sq 2 In-Depth Review
• Wareable – various insights on Fitbit 2025 changes