Fitbit Charge 6 vs Garmin Vivoactive 6 vs Xiaomi Smart Band 10 Pro - 2025's Ultimate Fitness Wearable Showdown

• The Fitbit Charge 6 includes on-wrist ECG and EDA sensors for stress, plus SpO₂ sleep tracking and a 50m water resistance aluminum body.
• The Garmin Vivoactive 6 is a round 42mm smartwatch with an aluminum bezel, 10.9mm thickness, two side buttons, 5 ATM water resistance, and 80+ sports modes.
• The Xiaomi Smart Band 10 Pro weighs about 22–30 g and uses a large 1.74-inch AMOLED screen with a 60 Hz refresh rate and up to 1500 nits peak brightness for the display.
• Display specs include the Charge 6’s 1.04-inch AMOLED, the Vivoactive 6’s 1.2-inch round AMOLED, and the Band 10 Pro’s ~1.74-inch AMOLED with 60 Hz refresh and 1500 nits brightness.
• Health tracking on the Charge 6 includes ECG, EDA, HRV, nocturnal SpO₂, skin temperature, menstrual data, and 40+ workout modes for comprehensive monitoring.
• The Vivoactive 6 emphasizes fitness analytics with 24/7 HR, SpO₂, stress, Body Battery, 80+ sport modes, Training Effect, and PacePro, but does not include ECG.
• The Band 10 Pro offers 24/7 HR, SpO₂, stress monitoring, 150+ sports modes, built-in GNSS with a compass, and 5 ATM water resistance, with no ECG or built-in NFC payments in global versions.
• GPS and navigation: Charge 6 uses single-band GPS with optional phone GPS and no on-device maps, while the VA6 supports multi-GNSS and basic route navigation with breadcrumb prompts.
• Battery life ranges: Charge 6 about 5–7 days; VA6 about 11–12 days in smartwatch mode (roughly 7 days typical with mixed use) and 17–21 hours of GPS; Band 10 Pro between 1–3 weeks depending on features, with about 1 hour to recharge.
• Pricing and value: Charge 6 launched at $159.95; Vivoactive 6 at $299.99; Band 10 Pro is expected at around $80–$90, with Band 9 Pro at about $79, reflecting strong value in the budget to mid-range spectrum.

If you’re shopping for a fitness wearable in 2025, you’re spoiled for choice. Fitbit’s Charge 6, Garmin’s Vivoactive 6, and Xiaomi’s Smart Band 10 Pro (along with its standard Band 10 sibling) represent the cutting edge of fitness trackers and smartwatches. Each promises to track your health, map your workouts, and deliver smart features – but which one is right for you? In this comprehensive comparison, we’ll break down design, display, health tracking, GPS accuracy, smart features, battery life, software ecosystems, price, and real-world performance for all three devices. We’ll also highlight the latest news (as of August 2025) and peek at what’s next for each brand. Let’s dive in and see how these wearables stack up.

Design and Build Quality

• Fitbit Charge 6: The Charge 6 sticks to a sleek fitness band form factor. It’s a slim, ultralight tracker (≈30–37g) with a narrow profile that’s comfortable 24/7. Fitbit reintroduced a side control on the Charge 6, though it’s not a physical button – it’s a pressure-sensitive haptic panel that you squeeze to wake or navigate, since the device has no real buttons. The casing is made of aluminum, and it’s water-resistant to 50m, so it’s swim-proof. The default band is a soft silicone strap with a traditional buckle; it’s easily swappable for third-party bands to suit your style. Overall the Charge 6 looks almost identical to the Charge 5, but that’s not a bad thing – the minimalist, screen-dominated design still looks modern and hasn’t aged much. It feels solid and well-built for a band-style tracker.
• Garmin Vivoactive 6: The Vivoactive 6 takes a smartwatch approach to design. It features a round 42 mm polymer case with a metal (aluminum) bezel, giving it a lightweight yet durable build. In fact, it’s almost indistinguishable from its predecessor (Vivoactive 5) – Garmin made only minor tweaks like slimming the case from 11.1 mm to 10.9 mm and shaving a few grams off the weight. You still get two side buttons on the right for tactile control, supplementing the touchscreen. The watch uses standard 20 mm quick-release straps (silicone by default), so you can swap bands easily. It’s also 5 ATM water-resistant (safe for swimming). Overall, the Vivoactive 6 has a clean, unisex look – sporty enough for workouts but stylish enough to wear all day. It’s not made of premium metal like some pricier Garmin or Apple models, but reviewers note it’s “small, compact, and nicely weighted,” with an ergonomic fit on the wrist.
• Xiaomi Smart Band 10 Pro: Xiaomi’s Smart Bands have gradually evolved from simple bracelets into more smartwatch-like devices. The Band 10 Pro (expected in late 2025) will likely continue this trend. For reference, last year’s Band 9 Pro had a sleek rectangular design with a large screen, housed in a 43 mm aluminum alloy case offered in three colors (silver, black, rose gold)wareable.com. It managed to be smaller than the prior 46 mm Band 8 Pro, making it a better fit for slim wrists while still looking and feeling premium for its pricewareable.com. The Band 9 Pro’s case was a bit thick but overall minimalist, and it had no physical buttons – all interactions were via the touchscreen, which some users missed when their hands were sweaty or wet. The strap is a removable TPU band with a pin-and-tuck clasp; Xiaomi also offers optional leather and magnetic strap upgrades to dress it upwareable.com. We expect the Smart Band 10 Pro to have a similar build (possibly a slightly larger or refined case) with the same 5 ATM water resistance. In sum, Xiaomi’s Pro band looks like a slim smartwatch – a “smart, minimalist design” that’s proven “likeable” in the Band 9 Prowareable.com – but remains extremely lightweight (≈22–30 g) and comfortable to wear.

Display (Type and Resolution)

All three devices boast bright AMOLED displays, but they differ in size and shape:

• Fitbit Charge 6: The Charge 6 features a 1.04‑inch AMOLED touchscreen display (color) protected by Gorilla Glass 3. While it’s the smallest screen of the three, it’s sharp and vivid for its size. The resolution isn’t officially stated, but text and icons are clear on the compact panel. Outdoor visibility is very good – one reviewer noted the Charge 6’s screen is “bright even in direct sunlight”tomsguide.com. The screen is fully touch-controlled (swipes and taps), with that side pressure sensor as a back/home function. The one drawback is its size: it’s fine for glanceable info, but some users may find it a bit cramped for reading longer notifications or detailed stats (a common trade-off for a slim band).
• Garmin Vivoactive 6: Garmin equipped the Vivoactive 6 with a 1.2‑inch AMOLED display at 390×390 resolution. In terms of shape, it’s a round watch screen. The size and resolution are identical to the Vivoactive 5 – about 326 ppi, which produces crisp text and graphics. It’s also a color display with vibrant visuals. Garmin doesn’t publicize the exact brightness in nits, but insiders estimate it around 1,500 nits peak, which aligns with it being easily viewable outdoors. The touchscreen is responsive to swipes and taps, and the interface allows up to 8 data fields per page now (up from 4 on the VA5) thanks to that resolution and updated UI. Overall, the Vivoactive’s screen hits a sweet spot: big enough to see a lot of info at once, but not so big that it kills battery life or makes the watch bulky. And if you prefer not to rely on touch, the two physical buttons can also navigate certain functions, providing a good hybrid control scheme.
• Xiaomi Smart Band 10 Pro: Xiaomi’s Pro band line is known for large, impressive screens. The Band 10 Pro will likely feature a roughly 1.74‑inch AMOLED display, similar to its predecessor. The Smart Band 9 Pro and 8 Pro both had a 1.74″ rectangular AMOLED with a 336×480 resolution (giving ~336 ppi). That’s a significantly bigger screen than the Fitbit’s, and closer to a full smartwatch display (though still vertical rectangle format). Xiaomi dramatically increased brightness on the Band 9 Pro – up to 1200 nits, double the prior gen – and the new Band 10 (non-Pro) pushes it further to 1500 nits peak. We can expect the 10 Pro to match or exceed that, ensuring visibility under bright sun. Another improvement in Band 10 (standard) is the move to symmetrical slim bezels (~2 mm) for a 73% screen-to-body ratio, which the 10 Pro will likely inherit. In short, Xiaomi’s display is the largest and arguably the most vibrant of this trio – it’s essentially a small phone screen on your wrist. It supports 60 Hz refresh for smooth animations. The touch responsiveness is generally good, even with sweaty fingers (Xiaomi added moisture-resistant touch tech to the Band 10). One caveat: there is no physical button, so if the touchscreen ever lags, you don’t have a manual fallback (a point reviewers made about earlier models). Still, for a budget-friendly device, Xiaomi’s AMOLED is a standout, delivering rich colors and plenty of real estate for watch faces and data.

Fitness and Health Tracking Features

All three devices cover the core health-tracking basics – but each has its own specializations and sensor arrays:

• Fitbit Charge 6: Fitbit packed the Charge 6 with an impressive suite of sensors for a tracker. It has an optical heart-rate sensor for continuous heart rate monitoring, and it can track heart rate variability (HRV) and resting heart rate throughout the day. It also includes red and infrared sensors for SpO₂ (blood oxygen) measurements during sleep. Notably, the Charge 6 carries “multipurpose electrical sensors” that enable an on-wrist ECG app (electrocardiogram) to assess heart rhythm and an EDA scan (electrodermal activity) for stress detection. These advanced sensors were already in the Charge 5, and continue here – meaning you can take a 30-second ECG reading by placing finger and thumb on the sides of the tracker to check for signs of atrial fibrillation. The EDA stress scan similarly involves a guided breathing session with your fingers on the case, measuring subtle sweat-induced conductivity changes. In practice, the ECG is a highly useful health feature (with results you can share with your doctor), while the EDA is more experimental – reviewers found the EDA insights “not hugely useful for most people”, since taking a 3-minute calm session can itself skew the stress reading. Aside from those, the Charge 6 tracks steps, distance, calories, and 24/7 heart rate, as well as sleep stages (light, deep, REM) with a sleep score each night. It has a built-in pulse oximeter (SpO₂) to log blood oxygen levels during sleep and help detect issues like apneatomsguide.com. It can also log skin temperature variation at night and menstrual health data (in the app). One omission: the Charge 6 does not have a barometric altimeter, so it cannot count floors climbed – a stat older Fitbits tracked. For exercise, the Charge 6 supports 40+ workout modes from running and cycling to yoga and HIIT. It will auto-detect common exercises (like walks, runs, bike rides) if you forget to start tracking, and it continuously monitors your heart rate zones during workouts with gentle buzz alerts when you switch zonestechradar.com. You also get cardio fitness level (VO₂ max estimate as “Cardio Fitness Score”) and guided breathing sessions. Overall, the Fitbit is a health mini-powerhouse: it even provides high/low heart rate alerts and irregular rhythm notifications using its sensors and algorithms. However, many of its richest health insights (detailed sleep analysis, Daily Readiness score, long-term trends) require a subscription to Fitbit Premium – more on that later. Still, out of the box you have everything from ECG to stress tracking in a discrete band, which is why Fitbit leads in this category of advanced health bands.
• Garmin Vivoactive 6: Garmin’s approach leans toward fitness and training features, but it covers health basics well too. The Vivoactive 6 uses Garmin’s Elevate Gen4 optical heart-rate sensor, which continuously tracks heart rate, including during workouts and sleep. It also measures blood oxygen saturation (SpO₂) with its Pulse Ox sensor – you can set it to check SpO₂ during sleep or 24/7 (though continuous SpO₂ will impact battery life). The Gen4 sensor also tracks stress levels all day (Garmin computes stress from heart rate variability) and feeds into Garmin’s unique Body Battery metric, which combines activity, stress, and rest to gauge your overall energy reserve. What the Vivoactive 6 notably lacks is an ECG function – Garmin’s newer Gen5 sensor (with ECG capability) appears in models like the Venu 3, but the VA6 stuck with Gen4. So there’s no ECG app on the Vivoactive 6, and thus no direct atrial-fibrillation detection. Nonetheless, it still covers a lot: heart rate alerts (high/low), advanced sleep monitoring (with sleep stages and scores via Garmin Connect), respiration tracking, hydration logging, menstrual cycle tracking, and guided breathing timers. Stress tracking is built-in, and the watch can prompt relaxation reminders if your stress remains high. On the fitness side, the Vivoactive 6 shines – it comes with 80+ sports modes (significantly expanded from the VA5), including everything from running, cycling, swimming (pool and open water), to golf, strength training, Pilates, HIIT, hiking, skiing, and even niche activities like pickleball and disc golf. The watch also introduces training metrics previously seen only on higher-end Garmins: for example, you now get Training Effect (aerobic/anaerobic impact of workouts) and PacePro strategies for running on the Vivoactive 6. It even supports Running Dynamics and Running Power, although you’ll need compatible accessories (like a Garmin HRM-Pro chest strap or foot pod) to fully utilize those advanced running metrics. Another first for Garmin here is the “smart wake” alarm, which wakes you at an optimal point in your sleep cycle – the Vivoactive 6 is the first Garmin watch to have this feature. This ties into its sleep tracking, aiming to gently wake you when you’re in light sleep near your alarm time. The VA6 also offers Garmin Coach training plans for running, cycling, and (newly) strength training, complete with on-watch animated workouts (like yoga or HIIT demonstrations). These coaching features, plus things like a race predictor and daily suggested workouts (it even suggests simple “walk more” goals to boost your activity) are part of Garmin’s push to make the Vivoactive 6 a holistic fitness companion. In summary, Garmin covers 24/7 wellness (HR, stress, sleep, SpO₂) well, though perhaps without the medical-grade extras like ECG. But it compensates with deep training analytics and exercise features inherited from its higher-end Forerunner and Fenix lines. If you’re someone who prioritizes guided workouts, training load, and a variety of sport profiles, the Vivoactive 6 has a clear edge.
• Xiaomi Smart Band 10 Pro: Xiaomi’s Smart Bands offer a broad array of tracking given their price, though not quite as specialized as Fitbit or Garmin. The expected Smart Band 10 Pro will certainly include continuous optical heart-rate monitoring, SpO₂ tracking, and stress monitoring, much like the Band 9 Pro. According to Xiaomi, the Band 9 series already had all the standard sensors: accelerometer, gyroscope, electronic compass, optical heart-rate & pulse ox, plus an ambient light sensor. The Band 10 (non-Pro) even upgraded the accelerometer/gyro to a 9-axis sensor (adding a compass) for more precise motion tracking – that compass was something the 9 Pro had, and now it’s standard on Band 10, so the 10 Pro might add a barometric altimeter to keep raising the bar. (An altimeter is still missing in current models, meaning Xiaomi bands don’t count floors either – it’s one feature Xiaomi might include in a Pro to match some Garmin/Apple capabilities.) In daily use, Xiaomi bands track steps, calories, distance, and give you alerts if you’ve been inactive (idle alerts). They monitor heart rate 24/7 and can buzz if your heart rate exceeds a set threshold. The Smart Band 9/10 also offer all-day stress tracking (likely based on HRV) and a stress score, plus breathing exercises to help you relax. For sleep, Xiaomi provides detailed sleep tracking with duration of deep, light, and REM sleep, as well as naps. However, some reviewers note that while sleep tracking is decent, it “lacks depth” compared to Fitbit/Garmin – for instance, you might not get all metrics on the band itself and have to check the app for a full breakdown. The Band 10 introduces a new 21-day sleep improvement program for more guided sleep insights, so Xiaomi is investing in deeper analysis. Women’s health (menstrual cycle logging) is supported as well. In terms of workout modes, the Band 9 Pro had 150+ sport modes available, and we expect the 10 Pro to have a similar huge list. These cover everything from running, walking, cycling (and it can auto-detect a handful of activities like walking or running), to swimming, yoga, jump rope, and more esoteric exercises. The inclusion of built-in GNSS (GPS) is a major differentiator of the Pro models – the Band 8 Pro and 9 Pro both have onboard GPS, whereas the base Xiaomi bands rely on your phone’s GPS. This means the Smart Band 10 Pro should let you track outdoor runs/rides without carrying a phone, mapping your route with its internal receiver. (The standard Band 10 has only connected GPS, despite a new compass – Xiaomi saved actual GPS for the Pro, per usual.) Early feedback on the Band 9 Pro’s GPS was positive – one user observed it “quickly locks on and tracks well, with only ~3% deviation” compared to known distances. We can expect similar solid GPS performance in the 10 Pro. The Xiaomi band also gives you a PAI (Personal Activity Intelligence) or “Vitality Score” which gamifies staying active, and it has some basic training analysis (e.g. it will show training load and VO₂ max estimations on the Band 9 Pro after runs, according to reviews). That said, Xiaomi’s analysis is not as advanced or validated as Garmin’s – it’s more in line with typical fitness trackers. In summary, the Smart Band 10 Pro covers heart, SpO₂, stress, sleep, women’s health, and a ton of workout modes, and it even matches big players on having built-in GPS and compass. It just doesn’t have “medical” features like ECG, and its data insights (sleep coaching, training metrics) are a bit more limited or require using the phone app for details. But considering its likely price, it offers “solid all-round tracking for the price” – as Wareable said of the 9 Pro – making it a great budget choice for most fitness needs.

GPS and Navigation Accuracy

• Fitbit Charge 6: The Charge 6 has built-in GPS for tracking pace and routes without a phone – a key selling point since the Charge 4. It uses a standard single-band GPS (no multi-frequency magic here). In terms of accuracy, it’s generally reliable for casual use, but an unusual quirk emerged: if the strap is worn too tightly, the Charge 6’s GPS reception can suffer. Reviewers discovered that fastening it snug (as you might to ensure heart rate accuracy) can cause the device to lose GPS signal or fail to lock on during a workout. This seems to be because your wrist/hand position can physically block the signal on such a small device when cinched tightly. Fitbit’s workaround is that the Charge 6 will seamlessly use your phone’s GPS if it’s nearby and connected – so if you run with your phone, you’d never notice an issue. But if you go phoneless and wear it tight, some users reported dropouts a few minutes into runs or difficulty acquiring a fix at all. The catch-22 is that loosening the band can help GPS, but then your heart rate tracking might wobble. In practice, many everyday users may not encounter this if they wear the band normally (not overly tight) and especially if they carry a phone. But it’s a point to note for accuracy purists. Aside from that, when GPS is working, the Charge 6 records routes about as accurately as other wrist wearables in its class – generally within a few percentage points of known distances. It doesn’t support fancy multi-GNSS or multi-band, so dense urban areas or trails under heavy tree cover might pose some challenge, but for city jogging and open-sky activities it does fine. One thing Fitbit does not offer on the tracker itself is any map or route navigation feature – you can’t load a route or see a breadcrumb trail on the Charge 6. You’d review the GPS map afterward in the Fitbit (now Google) app. The device will, however, display real-time distance, pace, and even turn-by-turn cues if you use the phone’s Google Maps integration (more on that in Smart Features). In short: the Charge 6’s GPS is convenient and fairly accurate for most, but be mindful of the strap tightness issue noted by reviewers.
• Garmin Vivoactive 6: The Vivoactive 6 features a robust multi-GNSS GPS receiver, meaning it can use multiple satellite constellations (GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, and now Beidou and QZSS were added) for tracking. It is not a dual-band (multiband) GPS device – so it still operates on the single frequency, unlike some high-end Garmin Fenix/Forerunners – but adding extra constellations improves coverage and speed of lock. In fact, Garmin bumped the satellite support from the VA5, giving the Vivoactive 6 the ability to use two additional systems for better global accuracy. In practice, the VA6 acquires GPS quickly and tracks distance and routes with the reliability Garmin is known for. Reviewers found it “performed generally well on the outdoor tracking front,” falling only slightly short of Garmin’s top multi-band watches in challenging environmentswareable.com. So unless you’re in a deep urban canyon or remote forest, the differences are minor – the Vivoactive will map your run or ride pretty close to reality (within normal GPS error margins of a couple percent). Battery life in GPS mode is strong too: about 17–21 hours of active GPS tracking per charge (Garmin quotes 21 hrs in “GPS only” mode). For navigation, while the Vivoactive 6 doesn’t have full-blown maps (no color topo maps like a Fenix), Garmin did introduce basic route navigation on this modelwareable.com. You can load a course (e.g. from Garmin Connect or a GPX file) and the watch will allow course following, showing a breadcrumb line or directional prompts so you can follow a pre-planned routewareable.com. This is something the Vivoactive 5 lacked, and it makes the VA6 more useful for hikers or runners following unfamiliar routes. There’s also an electronic compass now on board (another hardware addition), which aids in heading information and likely improves the accuracy of tracking orientation. One downside: unlike some Garmins, the Vivoactive 6 does not support multi-band (dual-frequency) GNSS, so it won’t achieve the ultra-precise location lock that, say, a Fenix 7X Sapphire can in very tough conditions. But given its target use, it’s more than sufficient. And of course, being a Garmin, you can connect external sensors like a foot pod or cycling sensors if needed for enhanced accuracy or indoor tracking. Also, if you ever find the wrist GPS data lacking, the VA6 lets you toggle “GPS + All Systems” or “GPS Only” for better battery or you can use connected GPS from your phone, though few will need that. Overall, expect the Vivoactive 6 to be very dependable for GPS tracking – few companies do it better, especially at this price – and now with some light navigation features, it’s even usable for basic hiking or route guidancewareable.com.
• Xiaomi Smart Band 10 Pro: One of the biggest selling points of Xiaomi’s “Pro” bands is built-in GPS capability – a rarity in sub-$100 wearables. The Smart Band 9 Pro introduced onboard dual-band GNSS (supporting GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BDS, etc.) for phone-free tracking. Xiaomi’s official spec notes “built-in GNSS” and indeed users reported that the 9 Pro could get a fast GPS lock and track runs without much hassle. We anticipate the Band 10 Pro will likewise include an improved GPS receiver. (Meanwhile, the just-launched base Band 10 does not have its own GPS, sticking to connected GPS via your phone – Xiaomi appears to be reserving onboard GPS for the Pro variant, consistent with the pattern from Band 7 Pro onward.) In real-world terms, the 9 Pro’s GPS accuracy was quite good for a budget device: test runs showed only slight variance (~3% difference) compared to known distances or higher-end trackers. It’s not immune to error – like any single-band GPS, tall buildings or dense forests can cause some drift – but casual users found it more than adequate for mapping their activities. The Band 9 Pro even supported open water swimming GPS tracking, a nice surprise at that price (thanks to 5 ATM waterproofing). We expect the Band 10 Pro to continue that. On the navigation front, Xiaomi’s bands do not offer complex routing or maps. There’s no ability to load a route or get turn-by-turn directions directly on the band. They are mainly designed to record your path and then let you view the map in the Mi Fitness app afterward. However, the inclusion of a magnetometer (compass) in recent models means the band can at least show your heading direction. The Band 10 standard added a compass to even the non-Pro version, so the 10 Pro will have it too – useful for basic orientation. Xiaomi could potentially introduce some simple navigation feature in the app (like guiding you back to start), but nothing like that has been confirmed. It’s worth noting the Band’s GPS can also broadcast or share data: Xiaomi mentioned the Band 10 can transmit live heart rate data via Bluetooth to devices like a cycle computer for better tracking (similar to how the Fitbit can broadcast HR to gym equipment). While that’s more about heart rate, it indicates these devices are getting more connectivity for fitness ecosystems. All said, if you want the cheapest gadget that can independently log a GPS run, the Smart Band 10 Pro is likely it. It won’t do breadcrumb navigation like Garmin, but it should match basic GPS accuracy for distance and route mapping well – letting you leave your phone behind on a jog. And for folks upgrading from the Band 9 Pro, Xiaomi has hinted at further improving tracking accuracy via that 9-axis sensor and algorithm tweaks, so the 10 Pro might refine swim tracking (Xiaomi claims 96% lap counting accuracy now) and outdoor tracking precision even more.

Smart Features (Notifications, Music, Payments, etc.)

Beyond fitness, how “smart” are these wearables in daily use? Let’s compare their smartwatch-like features and integrations:

• Fitbit Charge 6: The Charge 6 may be a band, but thanks to Google’s ownership of Fitbit, it gained a few smartphone-style tricks. Notably, the Charge 6 comes with Google’s apps built-in – it is the first Fitbit tracker to include Google Maps navigation, Google Wallet, and YouTube Music controls on the device. In practice, that means you can use the Charge 6 to assist with navigation: start a route on your phone’s Google Maps, and your Fitbit will display turn-by-turn prompts on your wrist (vibrating for upcoming turns). This is handy for cyclists or pedestrians who want to glance at directions without holding their phone. For payments, the Charge 6 uses Google Wallet (Google Pay) via its NFC chip, replacing the old Fitbit Pay. This broadens compatibility with banks and makes contactless payments easier – “more banks tend to support Google Wallet…for most folks this is a straight upgrade” over Fitbit’s system, noted TechRadartechradar.com. You can load your credit cards in the Wallet and pay by tapping the tracker at terminals. Music-wise, while the Charge 6 cannot store music files or stream on its own (no onboard music playback), it has YouTube Music controls: you can play/pause, skip tracks, and even select recently played artists on your phone’s YouTube Music app from the tracker. (Unfortunately for Spotify users, Fitbit removed Spotify control support; you’d need to switch to YouTube Music to use this feature.) Aside from Google-specific features, the Charge 6 does all the usual notification mirroring – it will show call alerts, texts, app notifications from your smartphone (Android or iOS). If you’re on Android, you can send quick replies or emojis to texts from the band, but iOS users can only view notifications (Apple’s limitations). The small screen means you won’t want to read long messages on it, but it’s sufficient for previewing incoming texts or WhatsApp messages. The Charge 6 also has timers, alarms (with smart wake option via the app), a weather app, and can show calendar events. One thing it lacks is any voice assistant on the device – previous Fitbits had Alexa or Google Assistant, but the Charge 6 does not have a microphone or speaker, so no voice features and no on-wrist calls. That said, you can use it to accept or decline incoming calls (it’ll notify you of a call, and you can reject or accept – but you’d need the phone to actually talk). The on-device menus and interface are improved from older Fitbits; they’re quite intuitive to swipe through, and Tom’s Guide praised that “the on-device menus are easy to use” on the Charge 6tomsguide.com. One critique: it still uses a proprietary charger (a small clip-like cable) that some find fiddly to align, but that’s more hardware than “smart” feature. All considered, Fitbit has made the Charge 6 feel more like a mini-smartwatch: you get contactless payments, basic navigation, music control, and robust notification handling, plus things like find-my-phone, all in a slim band. It’s not a full smartwatch – no third-party apps to install (Fitbit doesn’t really allow apps on the Charge line) and no voice/call capability – but for its size, it’s feature-packed.
• Garmin Vivoactive 6: The Vivoactive 6 is a true smartwatch in Garmin’s ecosystem, so it comes with a host of smart features. Starting with the basics: it pairs with your Android or iOS phone via Garmin Connect app to deliver notifications for calls, texts, emails, and third-party apps. You can view images in notifications (like if someone sends a picture message, the Vivoactive can display it – something Fitbit can’t do). If you’re on Android, you can also respond to texts or reject calls with quick replies from the watch (iPhone users can’t reply due to iOS restrictions). The watch can also control your phone’s music or, more powerfully, act as a standalone music player: Garmin included 8 GB of internal storage on the Vivoactive 6, double the 4 GB of the VA5. This allows you to download hundreds of songs or playlists from services like Spotify, Amazon Music, or Deezer (with premium subscriptions) for offline playback – you can connect Bluetooth headphones directly to the watch and leave your phone at homewareable.com. It supports syncing playlists over Wi-Fi from those services, or you can drag on your own MP3 files. This is a big advantage for those who love music during workouts – neither Fitbit nor Xiaomi offer true onboard music storage. Of course, you can also just control phone music if you prefer. The Vivoactive 6 has Garmin Pay for contactless payments, working similarly to Fitbit/Google Wallet. Just store your credit card in the Garmin Connect app and use the watch at NFC terminals – it’s accepted in many countries and banks (Garmin Pay support is fairly extensive). Another notable smart feature: the Connect IQ app store. The Vivoactive runs Garmin’s own OS, and you can install third-party watch faces, data fields, and widgets/apps from Garmin’s Connect IQ ecosystem. This means you can customize the look and add functionality – for example, you could download a watch face that shows additional metrics, or apps like a simple game, or a Uber transit widget, etc. It’s not as vast as Apple’s App Store, but it’s a perk for Garmin users that Fitbit/Xiaomi lack. Garmin also introduced a revamped UI in the VA6 that makes the menus and controls more phone-like and easy to navigate – testers found the new interface “much more intuitive and less cumbersome” than before. Features like calendar, weather, stopwatch, timer, alarms (with smart alarm feature unique to VA6) are built in. While the Vivoactive 6 lacks a microphone or speaker, Garmin did not include their voice assistant or call handling here – that’s something found on watches like the Garmin Venu 2 Plus, not on the Vivoactive series. So you can’t talk to any assistant on the VA6, nor take phone calls on your wrist (again, you can accept/reject calls, but you must speak on the phone itself). For many, that’s not a big deal, but it’s a differentiator vs. something like an Apple Watch. On the connectivity side, Garmin uses Bluetooth for phone connection and ANT+ for sensor connections (so you can hook up heart straps, cycling sensors, etc., which is great for fitness enthusiasts). The watch can also sync data over Wi-Fi when in range, like for music downloads or software updates. Lastly, Garmin’s platform now includes Connect + (Connect Plus), a new premium subscription that unlocks some advanced insights in the app (akin to Fitbit Premium) – but this doesn’t directly change the watch’s on-wrist features, it’s more on the software side (we’ll cover it in Software Ecosystem). Overall, the Vivoactive 6 is the most feature-rich “smartwatch” of these three: it does almost everything a general-purpose smartwatch does – notifications, payments, music, third-party apps – minus voice/call support. For many, it hits the sweet spot of fitness and smart capabilities without the daily charging burden of something like an Apple Watch. It’s telling that Forbes dubbed it Garmin’s next big mainstream smartwatch, arriving with new tricks like the smart alarm. In day-to-day use, you’ll find it a capable companion for both fitness tracking and checking info at a glance, and it works with both Android and iOS seamlessly.
• Xiaomi Smart Band 10 Pro: Xiaomi’s Smart Bands are more basic in the “smart” department, but they’ve been steadily adding features to feel less like isolated fitness trackers. The Smart Band 10 Pro will support the usual smartphone notifications – when paired via the Mi Fitness app, it will mirror incoming calls, texts, and app notifications from your phone. You can’t reply from the band (no typing or voice), but you can read a decent chunk of messages thanks to that wide screen. In fact, the larger display on the Pro gives notifications “a bit more room to spread out,” making them easier to read than on tiny bandswareable.com. There’s also a weather widget (which you can tap to see multi-day forecast) and widgets for things like music control and activity statswareable.com. Music controls are built-in, letting you play/pause and skip tracks on your phone’s player (be it Spotify, YouTube Music, etc.). The Band 9 Pro and likely 10 Pro can serve as a remote camera shutter for your phone as well, which is a neat little bonus for selfies. One thing Xiaomi typically includes (in China variants especially) is an NFC chip for payments or transit cards, but the global versions of Mi Bands have historically lacked NFC. The Band 9 Pro global had no payment functionality, and a Xiaomi community post laments “you can’t make payments” with it, calling it a missed opportunity. So unless Xiaomi surprises us with a global NFC model, expect no contactless payments on the Smart Band 10 Pro (in China, they might support AliPay or Mi Pay, but that won’t help elsewhere). Likewise, there’s no voice assistant, speaker, or mic on these bands – as one user noted, unlike some Huawei bands, you “can’t take calls” on the Xiaomi, and there’s no Alexa or Xiaomi AI assistant on global firmware. So phone calls can be declined or silenced from the band, but not answered. On the plus side, Xiaomi’s bands have other handy features: find my phone, idle alerts, incoming call alerts with contact info, and do-not-disturb sync with your phone. The Band 10 series also introduced some fun extras like mini-games on the wrist – Xiaomi says a few of the 200+ watch faces now include interactive mini-games (simple games to kill time) on the Band 10. It’s more of a gimmick, but an interesting one that shows the band’s processor can handle a bit more. You can also customize watch faces extensively – there are hundreds available via the Mi Fitness app and you can use your own photos. The Mi Fitness companion app is required for most of these features, and it’s available on Android and iOS (with nearly identical functionality on both). One advantage: the Bluetooth 5.4 connection (up from 5.3 in older models) ensures a stable, low-energy link to your phone. The Band will vibrate for incoming calls and notifications reliably as long as you’re within Bluetooth range. Overall, the Xiaomi Smart Band is “budget smart.” It covers the essentials – notifications, music control, weather, alarms, etc. – in a very affordable package. It won’t run third-party apps or replace your smartphone in any way, and power-user features like contactless pay or voice assistants are absent (in global versions). But for many users, being able to see messages, control music, and check the weather on a colorful screen while also tracking fitness is plenty. And considering its battery lasts weeks, you sacrifice some high-end smarts for convenience. If you need more advanced smart features (apps, voice, payments), you might lean toward a smartwatch like the Garmin or something like a Huawei Watch Fit. But if not, the Xiaomi band provides a solid set of everyday conveniences for a fraction of the cost.

Battery Life and Charging

Battery endurance is a major differentiator among these three wearables:

• Fitbit Charge 6: The Charge 6 offers a respectable battery life for a color screen tracker, though not the longest here. Fitbit advertises about 6–7 days on a single charge with typical use. In real-world use, reviewers found it largely meets that claim: about five to six days of normal usage (daily wear with notifications, a workout or two, and no always-on display)tomsguide.com. Fitbit itself says “up to 7 days”, which likely assumes minimal GPS use and screen-off most of the time. If you use always-on display mode, the battery drops much faster – one report noted it could cut down to ~2 days if always-on is enabled continuously. And heavy GPS usage will also sap it quickly (continuous GPS might last around 5 hours total). However, the design of the Charge encourages intermittent use of GPS (for workouts only) and raise-to-wake screen, so most people find charging once a week is sufficient. A Tom’s Guide editor highlighted that the Charge 6 “lasts six days between charges” in their testing, which they found ideal for a device of this typetomsguide.com. Charging the Charge 6 is done via a proprietary USB charging cable that attaches to the back with a clamp/magnetic connector. Fitbit’s charger is known to be a bit finicky – it’s a short cable with a tiny dock that you have to align properly on the tracker’s pins. It’s not too hard, but the “fiddly proprietary charger” was listed as a minor annoyance in at least one review. It usually takes around 1.5–2 hours to go from empty to full. Overall, while the Charge 6’s battery life isn’t multi-week, it significantly beats most full smartwatches (which often need nightly charging). You get nearly a week per charge, putting it in a comfortable zone for tracking sleep and daily activity without constant battery anxiety. Just note that if you plan a long GPS activity (like a marathon), the Charge might not last the whole event on one charge, whereas the Garmin likely would.
• Garmin Vivoactive 6: Despite its smartwatch capabilities and AMOLED screen, the Vivoactive 6 manages to deliver solid battery life, thanks to Garmin’s optimizations. Garmin rates it at up to 11–12 days in smartwatch mode (i.e. daily use with the screen off when not in use). With the always-on display enabled full-time, the estimate is about 5 days. Reviewers’ real-world tests confirm that roughly “a week with a mixture of fitness and smartwatch features” is achievable on the VA6. In other words, if you let the display sleep when you’re not actively looking at it (raise-to-wake), you can get around 7 days easily; if you insist on always-on time display and do a few GPS workouts, it’ll be closer to 4–5 days. This is quite impressive considering many Wear OS or Apple Watches last only 1–2 days. For GPS workouts, Garmin quotes 21 hours of GPS runtime (best-case scenario). In practice, using multi-GNSS mode it’s a bit less (around 17 hours). And if you stream music from the watch while using GPS (e.g. on a run with Bluetooth headphones), you get about 8 hours of battery – enough for a marathon with music. There’s also a Battery Saver mode that can stretch the watch to 21 days by turning off most smart features and radios. The Vivoactive 6 charges via Garmin’s standard proprietary cable (the same small 4-pin connector used on most Garmin wearables). It’s a better design than Fitbit’s clamp – it’s just a plug that snaps into the back. Charging from 0 to 100% typically takes around 2 hours. Users haven’t noted any particular issues with it; it’s widely used across Garmin devices. The bottom line: the Vivoactive 6 delivers multi-day battery life (about a week) under normal use and can handle long GPS sessions when needed. You likely need to charge it once or maybe twice a week depending on usage patterns, which is a fair trade-off given its bright display and features. It’s a draw with the Fitbit in everyday longevity (since many will use the Garmin with always-on off to hit ~7 days), but it far outlasts Fitbit in GPS endurance (hours vs. maybe ~5 hours for Charge). And compared to Xiaomi, Garmin is in the middle – much longer battery than an Apple or Wear OS watch, but shorter than the ultra-efficient Xiaomi band.
• Xiaomi Smart Band 10 Pro: Battery life is where Xiaomi’s bands blow away most of the competition. The Smart Band 10 Pro is expected to continue Xiaomi’s trend of multi-week battery endurance. The previous Band 9 Pro had a 350 mAh battery (up from 289 mAh in the 8 Pro), and Xiaomi claimed up to 21 days of typical use on the 9 Pro – a huge jump from the 14-day claim of the 8 Pro. Reviewers found that 21 days is achievable under light to moderate use: for example, with notifications on and some activity tracking but without always-on display or heavy GPS, ~2 weeks was quite realistic. In “heavy” usage, Xiaomi said the 9 Pro would last ~10 days (this scenario likely includes 24/7 SpO₂, lots of notifications, and always-on display active). If you do enable the always-on watch face, testers saw daily drain jump to 10–15% per day, meaning around 7–10 days total. Using the GPS regularly also impacts it, but impressively an hour of GPS activity only consumed about 5% of the battery in one test – that suggests you could get nearly 20 hours of GPS runtime, aligning with Xiaomi’s claims. In essence, most users can expect somewhere between one to two weeks of battery life on the Band 10 Pro, depending on settings, with a maximum of three weeks under ideal, minimal-use conditions. This far outlasts the Fitbit and Garmin, and it’s a major selling point for those who hate frequent charging. You can basically wear the Xiaomi band to sleep for days on end without worry. When it finally does need a charge, Xiaomi includes a proprietary magnetic charger that snaps onto pogo pins on the back of the device. The charger for Band 9 Pro was a bit flimsy, but it got a slight upgrade to allow faster charging – about just over an hour to go 0 to 100%, which is quicker than the older gen. So even charging bi-weekly isn’t a big deal when it tops up that fast. One thing to note: battery life “depends entirely on what you’re using” the device for, as a reviewer emphasized. Turn on all the bells and whistles (continuous SpO₂, advanced sleep analysis, constant stress monitoring, maximum brightness) and you’ll pull it closer to that ~1 week mark. But even that is on par with or better than the others’ best case. And if you keep things modest, you’ll easily go beyond 2 weeks. The freedom to not think about the charger for days is a key advantage of Xiaomi’s simpler, efficient OS and hardware (no power-hungry apps or cellular radios). In summary, battery life champion: Xiaomi Smart Band 10 Pro. It trades some functionality for endurance but for many that’s worth it. Garmin is in the middle with about a week, and Fitbit trails slightly with around 5–6 days typical. All three charge with proprietary cables, but that’s common in wearables.

Software Ecosystem and App Compatibility

How each device manages your data, and what apps or ecosystem you need to use, is an important part of the experience:

• Fitbit/Google (Charge 6): The Charge 6 relies on the Fitbit app (available on Android and iOS) to sync and view your detailed data. However, big changes are underway: since Google acquired Fitbit, they are integrating Fitbit into Google’s ecosystem. As of 2025, you need a Google account to sign in (Fitbit accounts were phased out), and some features tie into Google services (like Maps and Wallet on the device). The Fitbit mobile app is still the primary hub – it’s well-liked for its friendly interface and strong community/social features (challenges, leaderboards) built up over years. In the app you can see your steps, heart rate graphs, exercise routes, sleep analysis, etc., and even track diet or hydration. The app also offers Fitbit Premium, a subscription ($9.99/month) that unlocks more in-depth metrics, reports, and wellness programs. Notably, many of the Charge 6’s most advanced insights sit behind that paywall – “it’s still annoying many of its best features are locked behind the Fitbit Premium paywall,” said Tom’s Guide. For example, with Premium you get a Daily Readiness Score (suggesting how recovered you are each day), a Sleep Profile that after 14 nights assigns you a sleep animal archetype and gives granular insights, detailed wellness reports, and more personalized coaching. Without Premium, you still get basics (daily stats, 7-day or 30-day history, basic sleep stages, etc.), but some data like long-term trends and some workout content are limited. The Charge 6 can sync its data to other platforms to some extent – Fitbit can connect with services like Strava (to share workouts) or MyFitnessPal (for calorie counting) and exports basics to Apple Health or Google Fit if needed. But generally, Fitbit keeps you in its app for all the insights. The app is polished and user-friendly, one of Fitbit’s strengths. On the smartwatch side, the Charge 6 doesn’t support third-party apps (unlike Fitbit’s full smartwatches did), so you’re limited to what’s on the device. You can change watch faces via the app (Fitbit offers a decent selection of faces). One timely thing to mention is that Google has started to bring Fitbit’s expertise into the Pixel Watch line – and rumors suggest the next Pixel Watch might eventually replace Fitbit’s higher-end devices. There’s even talk that Google may sunset new Fitbit smartwatches to focus on Pixel Watches. However, trackers like the Charge might continue, and in fact there are whispers of a potential Fitbit Charge 7 possibly in late 2025. Still, nothing official yet – one Fitbit community post noted it’s a “two-year cycle” typically, implying a Charge 7 might not come until late 2025 or beyond. In any case, the Charge 6 will continue to get software support and updates via the app (Fitbit did issue updates adding new watch faces and improved features in mid-2025). Overall, Fitbit’s ecosystem is consumer-friendly: great if you want an easy app with encouragement and maybe are willing to pay for deeper insights, but it’s a bit closed if you want to export data or avoid subscriptions. It’s worth noting that if you have friends/family on Fitbit, the social aspect can be motivating (competitions, etc.). The Charge 6, in short, integrates into Google’s world (account, Maps, Wallet) while keeping the classic Fitbit app experience that many have come to love for its simplicity. Just be aware that fully unlocking its potential may require that Premium subscription – something to consider for value.
• Garmin (Vivoactive 6): Garmin’s ecosystem revolves around the Garmin Connect app (mobile and web). This platform is known for being feature-rich and data-dense – it’s a paradise for stats nerds, albeit sometimes overwhelming for casual users. The Vivoactive 6 syncs via Bluetooth to Garmin Connect on your phone, where you can view detailed charts of your heart rate, stress, sleep, body battery, and workout details (maps, splits, training effect, etc.). Garmin does an excellent job presenting training metrics like VO₂ max trends, race predictions, and training load, which serious athletes appreciate. Historically, one of Garmin’s bragging rights has been that all these insights come without a subscription – you buy the device, you get all the metrics free for life. And Garmin still offers nearly everything free, but in 2024 they introduced Garmin Connect +, an optional premium subscription plan. Connect+ ($6.99/month or $69.99/year after a trial) adds some new “premium features” in the app, like more personalized insights, adaptive training plans, and advanced sleep coaching. This caused some controversy among longtime Garmin fans (many felt it was a “slap in the face” after years of touting free services). The good news is that as of 2025, all core features – maps, training stats, health monitoring, Connect IQ app store, etc. – remain free. The subscription is purely optional and mostly adds guidance or analysis on top of your data (for instance, it might analyze your historical trends and give you tailored tips). We mention it because it’s a new development, but you do not need Connect+ to enjoy the Vivoactive 6; it’s perfectly powerful without it. Third-party compatibility is another Garmin strength: Garmin Connect can sync with a plethora of services – Strava, MyFitnessPal, Nike Run Club, and more. Many athletes love that their Garmin can automatically push workouts to Strava or TrainingPeaks. And since Garmin devices record data in fairly standard formats (FIT files), you can export or integrate your data into other tools easily. The Connect IQ Store is a key part of Garmin’s ecosystem on device. Through the separate Connect IQ mobile app, you can download watch faces, widgets, and apps to the Vivoactive 6. This is how you might add a Spotify app for music (though that’s likely pre-loaded), or a specific data field for a sport, or even games and utilities. It’s not an Apple-level selection, but it’s active – there are face designs and niche apps (like a Komoot navigation widget, or HomeKit controller, etc.). As for firmware updates, Garmin tends to update their watches periodically to add features or fixes – the VA6 received “slicker software” improvements at launch and will likely get refinements over time. In the broader picture, Garmin’s platform is geared toward fitness enthusiasts who value data control and integrations. You won’t find social challenges or “gamification” as much (though you can join Garmin Connect challenges and see insights, it’s less of a social network than Fitbit’s community). But you will find robust training analytics, historical data (all stored online so you can review years of activities), and even the ability to create workouts or courses and send them to your watch. If you prefer to keep things simple, you can ignore the complexity and just use it as a basic tracker in the app – Garmin’s improved their interface to be more user-friendly in recent years. Lastly, Garmin watches are known for longevity: even when a model is succeeded (no doubt a Vivoactive 7 or something may come in a year or two), the existing watch and its ecosystem keep working without forcing you into upgrades. In fact, “early 2025” saw Garmin swiftly upgrade the VA5 to the VA6 with only minimal changes; it’s not an every-year overhaul. So you can invest in the Garmin ecosystem confident that your data will remain accessible and your watch will get support for a long while. And unlike Fitbit’s uncertainty with Google or Xiaomi’s somewhat closed nature, Garmin is a stable, independent ecosystem primarily focused on fitness, which many hardcore users trust for the long haul.
• Xiaomi/Mi Fitness (Smart Band 10 Pro): Xiaomi’s wearables use the Mi Fitness app (also called Xiaomi Wear or Xiaomi Sports in some regions – it has evolved, but “Mi Fitness” is the global app now). This app is available on Android and iOS, and it’s required to sync and configure the Smart Bands. The Mi Fitness app has a simpler, more lightweight feel compared to Fitbit or Garmin’s apps. It shows your steps, calories, heart rate trends, sleep info, and exercise records. It also is where you set up things like notification permissions, watch faces, and firmware updates. Xiaomi doesn’t have a premium paid tier – all features are available with the device, no subscription needed. That fits with the Band’s budget ethos. However, the depth of analysis is more basic. For example, you’ll see sleep duration and a score, and even a new “Sleep Coaching” program on Band 10, but it may not give as nuanced guidance as Fitbit Premium’s sleep reports. User feedback on the Mi Fitness app has been mixed; some find it perfectly fine for basic tracking, others say it’s the weak link of Xiaomi’s ecosystem. There have been reports of sync issues or clunky UI in the past, though Xiaomi has improved it lately. One Reddit user mentioned hearing that “the Mi Fitness app isn’t [great]” even though the hardware is good. The app does the job, but it’s not as polished or insight-rich as Fitbit/Connect – think of it as utilitarian. It also lacks any social or community features; it’s mostly you and your data (you can share a workout to Strava manually by exporting a GPX, but there’s no automatic sync to Strava or similar without third-party tools, which is a downside for some athletes). Xiaomi does allow linking with Apple Health on iOS and Google Fit on Android, so you can sync basic data if you prefer those aggregators. Also, third-party tools like Zepp Life (formerly Mi Fit) or Amazfit’s app sometimes can work with Xiaomi bands if you prefer those interfaces, but that’s more for tinkerers. Speaking of tinkerers: Xiaomi’s bands, being popular, have some community support – for instance, you can find custom watch faces on forums and sideload them, or even custom firmware (though that’s advanced and not officially supported, and has gotten harder as Xiaomi locked things down). But for most, the stock app suffices. The HyperOS note: Xiaomi has been branding its new integrated software platform as HyperOS (especially on phones and some watches). The Band 8 Pro introduced Xiaomi’s “Hyper OS” on wearables, meaning the band’s interface and system might integrate better with Xiaomi phones (for example, deeper integration with phone’s UI or health app). On the Smart Band 9 Pro, reviewers noted the software felt smoother and better put-together than some competitors. It’s still a closed system – you can’t install full apps – but it’s reliable for what it does. In terms of updates, Xiaomi typically releases global versions a bit after China, and pushes firmware updates that occasionally add features (for instance, a recent Band 10 update added new vibration patterns for alarms). They also tend to release a new band every year, but you’re not forced to upgrade; your band will continue to work and sync (I still see people using Mi Band 5 or 6 with no issues). However, don’t expect years of new feature updates – they usually save big features for new hardware. One more thing: Xiaomi’s ecosystem plays well if you have other Xiaomi gadgets – e.g., you might unlock your Xiaomi phone with the band, or integrate with the Xiaomi Health app on their phones. But those are perks, not essentials. Summing up, Xiaomi’s software is simple and no-frills. It’s great that there’s no subscription and it’s cross-platform. But it doesn’t provide the deep analytical or community experience you get with Fitbit or Garmin. If you’re the kind of user who just wants to see your step count, sleep hours, and start an exercise on your band, Mi Fitness will more than suffice. If you crave extensive trend analysis or broad third-party syncing, you might feel a bit constrained. Considering the price difference, many are happy to make that trade. After all, “the Xiaomi Smart Band 9 Pro’s software feels a little better sewn up than the competition” at this budget, meaning it’s polished enough for most needs – just not overly advanced.

Price and Value for Money

When comparing value, it’s important to consider not just sticker price but what you get for your money:

• Fitbit Charge 6: The Charge 6 launched at $159.95 in the US (about £139.99 in the UK, €159 in Europe). Fitbit included a 6-month Fitbit Premium trial with purchase, to entice users with the advanced features. At its price, the Charge 6 sits in the midrange for fitness trackers. It’s more expensive than basic bands (Inspire 3 or Xiaomi’s offerings) but cheaper than most full smartwatches. For $159, you get built-in GPS, advanced health sensors (ECG/EDA), and integration with Google apps, which is quite compelling – indeed Tom’s Guide found the Charge 6 “easily the best fitness tracker for most people” in terms of balancing features and pricetomsguide.com. It was even given an Editor’s Choice by some reviewers. The value is evident if you specifically want those high-end health features without paying $300+ for an Apple Watch or Garmin. However, one must factor in the potential subscription cost: after the free Premium trial, continuing those insights costs $10/month. That’s not mandatory, but it’s part of Fitbit’s model. If you opt out, you still have a very capable tracker, just slightly limited in historical data and advanced guidance. As of mid-2025, the Charge 6 often sees discounts – it’s been on sale around $139 or $129 during eventssiliconinvestor.com. At those prices, it’s a steal for what it offers. Fitbit devices also tend to hold value in that they remain useful for years, though Google’s future plans introduce a bit of uncertainty (will a Charge 7 come? Will Google merge Fitbit into something else?). Right now, though, Charge 6 is a top choice under $200. It’s worth noting that some comparably priced alternatives include Garmin’s Inspire 3 (cheaper but fewer features) and entry-level smartwatches like the Fitbit Versa 4 or an older Apple Watch SE (which trade off battery life for more app functionality). But if fitness tracking is priority, the Charge 6 gives you almost everything you’d need in a sleek package at a fair price.
• Garmin Vivoactive 6: The Vivoactive 6 is priced at $299.99 in the US (£279.99 in the UK). Garmin notably kept this the same as the Vivoactive 5’s US launch price (they only slightly bumped UK/EU pricing). At $300, the VA6 squarely targets the mid-tier smartwatch segment. This is roughly the price of an Apple Watch SE or the new Google Pixel Watch 3 (the Pixel Watch 3 starts at $299 as well). Compared to those, the Garmin lacks a flashy app ecosystem or cellular option, but offers far superior battery life and fitness depth. For serious fitness users, $300 is good value considering you get multi-sport GPS watch capabilities, music, and training tools that often required a $400+ watch before. Additionally, Garmin does not charge a subscription for core features, so once you buy it, you have all the training metrics, mapping, etc., included (Connect+ is optional and new, but not necessary). If we look at pure specs for price: yes, a $80 Xiaomi band can have GPS and HR tracking too, but the quality and breadth of Garmin’s sensors, algorithms, and build justify the gap for many. You’re also paying for Garmin’s reliability and after-sales (their devices tend to last many years). Still, $299 is a leap from a $159 Fitbit or certainly from a $80 Xiaomi. If you won’t use the advanced sports features, a cheaper tracker could be better value. Garmin seems to recognize this positioning: Wareable noted that the Vivoactive 6’s price puts it in line with the “entry-to-mid level smartwatches” from Apple, Google, Samsung. The value proposition of the VA6 is strongest for those who want a do-it-all fitness watch that also covers basic smartwatch duties, at a moderate price. It’s not as premium as a $400 Garmin Venu or Fenix, but nearly as capable in many respects. Also, since the Vivoactive 5 was just a year older and very similar, some might find the VA5 on clearance (~$200) an even better deal if they don’t need the new features – Garmin themselves implied it’s “not one we think is worth upgrading to if you’re already the owner of a Vivoactive 5”. But for new buyers choosing between 5 and 6 at similar prices, the 6 is the better buy with its extras. In summary, at $299 the Vivoactive 6 offers tremendous fitness and battery value over similarly priced mainstream smartwatches, though if your needs are basic tracking, it could be more watch (and expense) than necessary. Garmin’s durability and no ongoing fees also enhance its value for money over time.
• Xiaomi Smart Band 10 Pro: Xiaomi’s exact pricing for the Smart Band 10 Pro isn’t announced at the time of writing, but we can extrapolate from past models. The Smart Band 9 Pro was $79 in the US (though it wasn’t officially sold in the US, importers had it around $80-90) and £62 in the UK. That was a slight bump from the 8 Pro. It’s likely the 10 Pro will land in the ~$80–$90 range (perhaps around $89 if they include new features) – still under $100. This is a fraction of the cost of the Fitbit and Garmin. For well under $100 you’re getting a device that covers an enormous amount of functionality: big AMOLED display, built-in GPS, heart rate, SpO₂, etc. The value for money is arguably Xiaomi’s greatest strength. Wareable even called the 9 Pro “one of the best budget options to grab” because you get a bright, feature-packed device at a budget price. Xiaomi typically undercuts major brands by a wide margin. Of course, there are reasons for the lower price: cheaper materials (plastic/aluminum vs steel/titanium in expensive watches), no third-party app support, no NFC payments globally, and perhaps not the same level of sensor accuracy or algorithm sophistication. But for a huge segment of users who just want a capable fitness tracker, the Xiaomi Pro bands are almost unbeatable in value. You could literally buy three or four Xiaomi Smart Band 10 Pros for the price of one Vivoactive 6. That being said, value also depends on usage: if you need the richer ecosystem or premium feel of Garmin/Fitbit, you might find Xiaomi lacking in those areas. But if you compare the Band 10 Pro to something in its own price bracket – e.g. the base Fitbit Inspire 3 ($99) or other budget trackers – Xiaomi often offers more tech for the money (the Inspire has no GPS, simpler screen, etc., at a higher price than Xiaomi). The only caution on Xiaomi is regional availability: they sell these bands officially in Europe, parts of Asia, etc., but not always in North America through official channels. So the “street price” might vary with import fees if you’re in a region where it’s not directly sold. Still, even then it usually remains under $100. Also, Xiaomi’s approach is to release new models annually, which could tempt you to upgrade more often (small cost each time, but something to note). Yet, many stick with a Xiaomi band for 2-3 years and skip a generation, which is fine because of the low cost. In conclusion, the Xiaomi Smart Band 10 Pro offers an incredible value proposition: it packs many features of pricier trackers at a budget price. It’s ideal for cost-conscious consumers or those entering the fitness wearable world without a big investment. The main trade-off is you won’t get the same polish, support, or ecosystem as the pricier devices – but if those aren’t priorities, why pay more? This device arguably has the highest bang-for-buck ratio here.

Real-World Performance and User Reviews

What are reviewers and users saying after actually using these devices? Let’s highlight some real-world impressions, pros, and cons reported:

• Fitbit Charge 6: The Charge 6 has generally been very well-received as a return to form for Fitbit’s tracker line. Many reviewers praised its balance of size and features. Tom’s Guide named it the “best overall fitness tracker in 2024”, noting the Charge 6 was “easily the best fitness tracker for most people”tomsguide.com. They lauded its bright screen, intuitive interface, and the fact it “lasts six days between charges”, making it ideal for all-day and all-week usetomsguide.com. Users also appreciate the convenience of the new Google integrations – having turn-by-turn directions on a band and paying via NFC on a device this small feels very futuristic and practical. Casual users love features like automated exercise tracking and Fitbit’s polished sleep tracking (Fitbit is often cited as one of the most accurate wrist sleep trackers for detecting sleep/wake and giving useful sleep quality feedback). The Premium paywall does come up in many reviews as a negative – e.g., some frustration that detailed wellness reports or even the Daily Readiness score require ongoing payment. However, not everyone minds if they were already planning to use Fitbit Premium or if they only care about the basic metrics. In terms of accuracy, step counting and sleep tracking on the Charge 6 are considered very good, as Fitbit has years of algorithm tuning. Heart rate accuracy is solid for daily wear (resting heart rate, etc.), but during high-intensity workouts it’s decent rather than class-leading. In one head-to-head test, the Charge 6’s step count was within a few steps of a manual count over 5,000 steps, which is “commendable”, and its heart rate during a walk matched an Apple Watch’s reading closelytomsguide.comtomsguide.com. But more demanding tests by TechRadar found that while the Charge 6 is fine for moderate exercise, it can “mess up quite badly in the first 5–10 minutes of a run” before stabilizing, and even then it doesn’t approach chest-strap accuracy for intervals or very intense sessions. They concluded it’s “aimed at a lighter-exercising crowd rather than marathon trainers,” and that its heart rate tracking “won’t trouble…a decent Garmin” for hardcore accuracy needs. This suggests that for everyday fitness – walks, casual runs, gym classes – the Charge 6 is great, but serious athletes might outpace its capabilities. GPS performance feedback is mixed due to the aforementioned strap issue. Some users have no problems and get accurate distance maps; a subset noticed dropouts. It’s a known quirk but doesn’t affect everyone. On forums, Charge 6 owners generally love the comfort and the fact they get smartwatch-like features without a bulky watch. Complaints from users include: the display can be a bit small for reading long messages, the lack of altimeter for floors, and the removal of music control for anything except YouTube Music. A few long-time Fitbit users lamented the loss of third-party app support (older Fitbit smartwatches had Spotify control or Starbucks apps, etc., but the Charge focuses on Google’s ecosystem now). Durability seems good – it has aluminum case and Gorilla Glass, and few have reported screen scratches or cracks unless it took a serious hit. Also, importantly, after Google’s account transition, some experienced a hiccup in setup, but once done, the device performs reliably. Summing up user sentiment: the Charge 6 delivers on its promise of a feature-rich tracker. It’s frequently described as making one question the need for a full smartwatch – “Do I even need a smartwatch anymore?” quipped one tech blogger, given the Charge 6 did so much in a small form. For those primarily focused on health tracking, it’s a star. But if you’re a data perfectionist during workouts or hate subscriptions, you might find a couple of niggles with it.
• Garmin Vivoactive 6: Since the Vivoactive 6 is relatively new (launched April 2025), a lot of feedback comes from reviewers and upgraders from VA5. The consensus is that the VA6 is an incremental upgrade – “a minimal update”, as Wareable put it – but it’s a very strong watch regardless, especially for first-time buyers. Those coming from the VA5 often say if you have the 5, you won’t gain a ton by moving to 6 (mainly UI improvements and a few new features). However, new users and those upgrading from much older models are impressed by the crisp AMOLED screen and the breadth of functions. Fitness and GPS performance are highlighted positively: the watch is generally accurate in tracking runs, rides, swims, etc., and having access to Garmin’s training metrics is a big plus at this price. Many love the added running features – PacePro, running dynamics, etc. – which make the VA6 feel like a more serious training partner. One new feature garnering praise is the smart wake alarm; users report it really helps them wake up feeling less groggy, and they appreciate that Garmin finally implemented a feature rivals had. On the flip side, some early reviews pointed out two features new to Garmin on the VA6: the smart alarm and a slightly revamped interface, and quipped that otherwise it’s very much the same device with a coat of polish. User interface improvements (more widgets, revamped controls) have been very well received – one review noted the Vivoactive 6 is “a much more intuitive and less cumbersome smartwatch for daily use” thanks to the software revamp. It feels smoother to navigate than the VA5 did. Battery life feedback confirms it meets expectations (getting about a week normally), and people love not having to charge nightly like they would with an Apple Watch. When it comes to accuracy, Garmin’s heart rate sensor is usually good, but not the absolute best for high intensity. The VA6 using the older Elevate Gen4 means its HR accuracy is roughly on par with the VA5/Venu 2 – generally fine for steady cardio, might lag in quick intervals, but you have the option to pair a chest strap which many serious users do. No ECG is a non-issue for most Garmin fans, but a few note that Garmin’s first ECG-capable watches (Venu 2 Plus via firmware, and others) mean it’s a shame it’s missing here. Real-world durability: Garmin’s build is solid; few if any complaints of cracks or failures. The polymer case means it can scuff a bit if bashed, but it doesn’t shatter. The AMOLED is bright and has good scratch resistance (though not sapphire, it’s presumably Gorilla Glass). Comparisons: Some users cross-shopping mention that the Vivoactive 6, at $299, undercuts more expensive Garmins that have similar core features (like Venu 3 at $399), so they feel it’s a “sweet spot” model – you get 90% of the features for $100 less. However, some runners on forums say if you’re really into running, a Forerunner 255 or 265 (around the same price) might offer an altimeter and more training analysis. Wareable even suggested considering the Forerunner 165 (a rumored model) or similar if you need altimeter and advanced nav. But for a general consumer, the Vivoactive 6 hits a broader appeal: it’s equally at home tracking a gym workout, a yoga session, or a run, and then showing your notifications at work. That versatility gets praise. The value also gets mentioned – while $300 isn’t cheap, one reviewer pointed out you’re getting a lot of what premium watches offer, making it a savvy buy. In conclusion, early reviews and user comments rate the Vivoactive 6 as a fantastic all-rounder. It may not be an exciting leap from its predecessor, but it is unquestionably a better watch – “There’s no doubt that the Vivoactive 6 is the better smartwatch” compared to the 5, one review’s verdict stated. It’s recommended for those who want Garmin’s ecosystem in a more lifestyle-friendly package. Complaints are relatively few: lack of altimeter (so no stair counts) is one, and the absence of any voice features means it’s slightly behind true “smartwatch” competitors for those who care about taking calls or using Alexa on the wrist. But if those aren’t priorities, most find little to complain about.
• Xiaomi Smart Band 10 Pro: At the time of writing, the Band 10 Pro isn’t out yet, so let’s draw from the Smart Band 9 Pro user experiences (and initial Band 10 standard reviews) to gauge expectations. The 9 Pro was quite well-received in the budget community. Design and screen got a lot of compliments – people loved the large, vibrant display and that the device still felt slim and comfortable. “Big, bright screen…good battery life…likeable design” were phrases from Wareable’s 4/5 star review. Many users found it a perfect middle ground between a tiny band and a full watch. However, some did note they missed having a physical button for quick actions. The GPS performance on the 9 Pro impressed a lot of folks – having a band that you can take on a run without a phone at this price is a game-changer. People reported that the GPS accuracy was surprisingly decent (as noted earlier, one user measured ~3% error which is quite good). Battery life was a standout positive: users regularly got around 10 days or more without trying too hard, and that’s with plenty of notifications and some workouts. This reliability in battery was a breath of fresh air for those coming from Apple/Android watches. Health tracking accuracy: generally, users say heart rate tracking is okay for daily monitoring, but not medical-grade. Some did notice issues with certain metrics – for example, sleep tracking on the 9 Pro sometimes overestimated deep sleep or didn’t provide as much detail; one review specifically noted “deep sleep calculation inaccuracy” on the 9 Pro. Also, you have to check the phone app for full sleep details since the band shows only limited info, which some found inconvenient. Heart rate during exercise can lag or spike oddly at times – not uncommon for wrist trackers, especially budget ones. But overall, for casual fitness, people were satisfied with the tracking given the cost. A few athletes tried pushing it – say interval running – and saw that the band struggled to keep up with rapid heart rate changes (again, expected at this tier). App and ecosystem feedback: This is where Xiaomi gets some critique. The Mi Fitness app is functional but not as polished; some users encountered connectivity quirks or said the data analysis isn’t very deep. But others find it straightforward and appreciate not having to pay for any extra features. There’s also a noted lack of third-party sync – the band won’t auto-send workouts to Strava, for instance, which some fitness folks desire (though you can export GPX files manually). Smart features: Users enjoy getting notifications on the band; the common remark is it works well for reading messages but obviously you can’t reply. The weather, music control, etc., all perform as expected. An often-mentioned downside: no NFC/payments on global model – a number of people express disappointment because Xiaomi includes NFC in Chinese versions for transit and such, but disables it for global, so “can’t make payments” came up in user discussions as a negative. Also, no voice assistant or ability to answer calls (some Huawei or Redmi bands have basic BT calling, Xiaomi’s doesn’t) – but at this price, it’s not expected. Reliability and build: The 9 Pro’s build quality seems good; the aluminum frame and 2.5D glass make it feel more premium than plastic bands. Some users did mention the magnetic strap (if they bought that accessory) could loosen slightly over time – so perhaps not ideal for vigorous exercise, better to use the silicone strap then. The band survived swims and showers fine (5 ATM held up). The touch interface, being the only input, mostly is smooth, but occasionally it might misregister swipes when wet, etc. Nothing alarming, though. Overall, the impression is that Xiaomi’s Pro band line delivers an experience far above what you’d expect for the cost. A Tech Advisor review of the 9 Pro called it “the BEST Smartband” and highlighted the addition of GPS and comprehensive tracking. Wareable’s editor Michael Sawh concluded that while it’s not vastly different from the 8 Pro, it “remains a great budget tracker and smartwatch hybrid”. The target audience – people who want advanced features on a budget – are generally very happy. Many say things like: “For the price I paid, I’m blown away by what it can do.” The value-for-money factor overshadows its minor flaws. So, for the upcoming Band 10 Pro, expectations are high that it will continue this trend. If it indeed adds a barometer or other enhancements, it might address some past omissions. The biggest unknown will be whether Xiaomi increases the price much – if not, it will likely be a hit among budget-conscious tech fans. In short, user reviews position Xiaomi’s Smart Band Pro series as excellent bang-for-buck, perfect for everyday fitness tracking, albeit with a few rough edges in software and lacking the polish or extreme accuracy of pricier devices.

Availability in Different Regions

One important practical aspect is where you can buy each device and what regional differences exist:

• Fitbit Charge 6: Fitbit (now under Google) sells the Charge 6 in many regions worldwide. It’s available in North America, most of Europe, and many Asia-Pacific countries through the Google Store, Amazon, and electronics retailers. In the US, it’s commonly found at stores like Best Buy, Walmart, Amazon, etc., often with sales during holidays. Europe (UK, Germany, France, etc.) also has wide availability; Google’s Fitbit presence is strong there. It launched in October 2023 and rolled out globally around that time, so by 2025 it’s stocked virtually everywhere Fitbit products are normally sold. In regions like India or Middle East, Fitbit has official distributors, so the Charge line should be available in major cities or online. One thing to note: Fitbit’s ECG feature on the Charge 6 is region-restricted by regulations. The ECG app is only available in select countries where it’s been approved (e.g., US, UK, much of EU, Canada, Australia, etc.). If you import it to a country where Fitbit hasn’t enabled ECG, that feature might not work. Similarly, Google Wallet on the device will only work in countries where Google Pay is supported and with participating banks. Aside from that, the device is the same hardware globally (no separate “China only” variant or such). Languages: The Charge 6 supports multiple interface languages set via the app. As for support, Google has been transitioning Fitbit support to their channels, but users in various regions should still have warranty and service via Fitbit’s standard policies (typically a 1-year warranty, possibly 2 in EU). Overall, if you’re in North America or Europe, getting a Charge 6 is as easy as ordering online or visiting a store. In other regions, it’s likely available but check local retailers or Fitbit’s site.
• Garmin Vivoactive 6: Garmin sells its products globally through a wide network. The Vivoactive 6, being a mainstream model, is available in North America, Europe, Asia, and many other markets through Garmin’s own web store and authorized retailers. It launched in early April 2025, and Garmin often does a simultaneous global release for such devices. In the US, you can buy it from Garmin’s site, Amazon, and big retailers like Best Buy. In Europe, Garmin’s regional sites (Garmin UK, Garmin DE, etc.) carry it, as do retailers like Decathlon, MediaMarkt, etc. It likely comes in a couple of color options (maybe black, white, etc.), and sometimes availability of colors can vary by region (for example, a certain case color might be exclusive to Garmin’s online store). There’s typically just one size (42mm) and no LTE version, so no complication of variants. Regional features: Garmin’s features are mostly global. There are no locks on ECG because it doesn’t have that, and no voice assistant tied to a region. Garmin Pay works in many countries, but you’ll need a bank card from a supported bank in your country (Garmin keeps a list). Maps aren’t on this device, so no concern there. One subtle regional note: text responses and phone features depend on your phone OS, not region (Android vs iOS). Also, language support on Garmin watches is wide (English, European languages, some Asian languages). However, historically some Garmin models sold in China have a different firmware for Mandarin support. The Vivoactive series likely supports Chinese out of the box in global firmware now, but Garmin might still do a separate SKU for mainland China (and possibly not call it “Vivoactive” due to naming differences). Generally though, if you buy a Vivoactive 6 in one region, it will work anywhere – GPS and sensors are universal. Warranty service is usually region-based (Garmin asks you to contact the regional support where you bought it). Stock and delivery: Because it’s a 2025 model, it should be readily in stock in Garmin’s distribution. Some users noted quick sellouts of certain Garmin models at launch, but by mid-2025, VA6 should be easy to get.
• Xiaomi Smart Band 10 Pro: Xiaomi’s availability can be a bit tricky, especially for global markets. The Smart Band series is extremely popular in China and India and generally available across Asia. For global: Xiaomi usually launches the base Smart Band globally (e.g. Band 10 standard was launched globally in summer 2025). The Pro models sometimes launch first in China and then later (or sometimes not at all) globally. For example, the Smart Band 7 Pro was eventually sold in Europe officially, and the 8 Pro as well. The Smart Band 9 Pro did get a global release (Xiaomi’s global site lists it, and it was available in Europe). If Xiaomi follows the pattern Marko Maslakovic described, they may announce the Band 10 Pro in late August or September (possibly around IFA 2025 in Berlin) and then release it in Europe in early fall. So it should be available in China first (likely through Xiaomi’s online store and retailers like Tmall, JD.com), and then in Europe (UK, EU) via Xiaomi’s official stores and Amazon by late 2025. The price will be in the local currencies (maybe ~€80-90). India is a market that often gets the base Mi Band but not always the Pro variant, or gets it later. Xiaomi sometimes prioritizes the non-Pro for India due to pricing sensitivity. But enthusiasts in India often import the Pro or buy from gray market. For the Americas: Xiaomi does not officially sell wearable devices in the U.S. due to lack of official presence (they focus on phones in limited regions and some smart home gear). So in the U.S., you’d have to import the Band 10 Pro via Amazon (some third-party sellers list global version), or sites like AliExpress, Giztop, etc. The global version usually has English and other languages built-in (Xiaomi includes a bunch of languages in firmware). Buying an imported Xiaomi band is common among U.S. techies – the warranty might not apply or would require shipping back to seller. But given the low cost, many take that route. In Europe, Xiaomi has official online stores and Mi Home shops in many countries, so warranty and availability are more straightforward. Latin America: Xiaomi has presence in some LATAM countries (Mexico, etc.) with phones, and sometimes they bring bands too. It varies. If not, importing from AliExpress is an option there as well. Regional variations: One key difference is NFC. In China, the Band 10 Pro might come in an NFC edition enabling Mi Pay or transit cards. In global versions of past bands, Xiaomi either removes NFC or leaves it but only for Mi Pay in limited regions (which often doesn’t support many banks outside China/Russia). So, expect that even if the hardware has NFC, you likely won’t have Google Pay or similar – Xiaomi has not partnered with Google on that for their bands. Only Amazfit (Zepp) did a bit with Alexa on bands, but Xiaomi hasn’t done Alexa on their Smart Bands globally either. Voice assistant: The Chinese versions sometimes have Xiaomi’s Xiao AI voice assistant if they have a mic (the Bands usually don’t have a mic though, except maybe the ones with Alexa on Amazfit side). The 10 Pro likely has no mic, so no voice for any region. So in summary, availability: Asia (especially China, likely India) definitely; Europe likely official (as Band 9 Pro was); North America no official, but easy import. The timing might be staggered – a few months after Chinese launch for global. By the end of 2025, it should be relatively easy to obtain worldwide.
• Color and Edition availability: Fitbit Charge 6 comes in a few colors and special editions (e.g., one model might come with two bands). All are available globally. Garmin Vivoactive 6 likely has 2-3 color options (like slate/black, silver bezel with gray band, etc.). Those should all be sold in main markets; sometimes one color can be region-specific but Garmin tends to make all available. Xiaomi Band Pro often has multiple strap color options, but usually the default is black. You can then buy additional straps (Xiaomi sells or third parties) in various colors/materials. Xiaomi also released a ceramic edition for Band 8 and Band 10 standard (like a premium ceramic case model) at higher price. If they do a ceramic or special edition Band 10 Pro, it might be limited to China or only via Xiaomi’s official channels. For example, the Band 10 standard has a ceramic-bodied model for ¥ which might not go global.

Latest News and Future Outlook

Staying current as of August 2025, here are the latest updates and rumors for each device and their possible successors:

• Fitbit Charge 6 – Latest news: The Charge 6 has been on the market for nearly a year now. In mid-2025, Google/Fitbit rolled out some notable firmware updates. In July 2025, an update added new watch faces and enhanced functionality: specifically, Fitbit added three new watch faces (named Momentum, Geometric, and Axira) giving users more ways to view their stats at a glance. They also expanded the Charge 6’s ability to broadcast heart rate to gym equipment – it could already connect to popular machines (Peloton, NordicTrack, etc.), but support has grown, making it compatible with more treadmills and rowing machines that accept Bluetooth HR signals. Forbes reported “Owners of the Fitbit Charge 6 get four great new features” including those watch faces and improved gym mode, which came through software. This shows Google’s commitment to keep improving the device. Additionally, Fitbit’s integration with Google services deepened: as of early 2025, Fitbit users were prompted to migrate to Google accounts, and by now that transition is largely complete (which affects how you log in and sync, but doesn’t change device functionality much aside from requiring a Google login). User base and sales: The Charge 6 has been selling well and often appears in “best fitness tracker” lists of 2024/2025. It even went on sale during Prime Day events, suggesting it’s a popular item (Tom’s Guide highlighted it being on sale and reiterated it as a top pick). As for any successor: There’s no official word on a Fitbit Charge 7 yet. Some rumor mill talk (unconfirmed) suggested a possibility of a 2025 launch, potentially around Fitbit’s usual fall timeframe, but nothing concrete has leaked. A Gadgets & Wearables article speculated it’s a “good bet” we might see Charge 7 by Sep/Oct 2025 to align with IFA and a 2-year cadence. However, another perspective from the Fitbit community is that Google may not rush a new Charge because they’re focusing on other product lines (Pixel Watch, etc.). There was even a wild rumor on Reddit claiming a Charge 7 might run Wear OS, but that should be taken with a big grain of salt, as it seems unlikely for a band form factor. For now, if a Charge 7 is coming, it’s still under wraps – if it doesn’t appear by end of 2025, it could mean Google will let the Charge 6 ride longer or possibly rebrand future trackers (who knows, a “Pixel Band” someday?). It’s also noteworthy that Google appears to be phasing out Fitbit’s proper smartwatches (Sense and Versa lines) in favor of Pixel Watch development. The tracker line like Charge might continue since Pixel doesn’t cover that segment. But no matter what, the Charge 6 remains the current model and should continue receiving support/updates through 2025 and beyond. Keep an eye on Google’s announcements around late summer 2025 – if Charge 7 is coming, that’s when we’d likely hear it. If not, the Charge 6 will likely hold its title until at least 2026.
• Garmin Vivoactive 6 – Latest news: The Vivoactive 6 is brand new as of April 2025, so the latest news has been its launch coverage and initial reviews. It “swiftly upgraded” the Vivoactive line after the long gap before the 5, so now Garmin has a current model in this segment. In the months since release, Garmin issued minor firmware updates to fix any launch bugs (for example, improving the user interface responsiveness and squashing any syncing issues – Garmin is usually good at quick patches via Garmin Express or OTA). A notable point in news: Garmin’s introduction of the Connect+ subscription in mid-2024 was a shift, and by 2025, those features are being rolled out. For instance, “Morning Report” and advanced sleep coaching – Garmin launched those on the Venu 3 and now they might come to the Vivoactive 6 via Connect+ or updates. Actually, interestingly, the Vivoactive 6 got the smart wake alarm, which was absent before and is essentially part of Garmin’s enhanced sleep features. So Garmin is trickling down high-end features to mid-range devices. Upcoming Garmin wearables: Garmin tends to follow their own schedule. Since the VA6 just came, a Vivoactive 7 would be a couple of years out (2026 or so) unless they rebrand or integrate it with the Venu line. Garmin did just release the Venu X1 in 2025 (their newest OLED lifestyle watch), which has an even bigger display and thinner build – that’s a higher tier at $399. The Vivoactive 6 sits below that. It’s likely Garmin will keep the Vivoactive 6 in the lineup through 2025 and into 2026. However, one thing to watch: Garmin sometimes introduces variants or special editions (for example, a Vivoactive 6 Music or a different size). Since they already have music in the base model, that’s covered. But they might do new colors or slight hardware tweaks eventually. Garmin’s 2025 roadmap as rumored on Reddit includes an Instinct 3, possibly new Fenix or Forerunner updates, but nothing specific about another Vivoactive yet. In the news, Garmin also launched updated Fenix 8 and Enduro 3 in 2025, pushing more advanced features – some of which (like ECG via Gen5 sensor, Training Readiness) might later come down to mid-range models. If Garmin wanted, they could enable ECG on the Vivoactive 6 via Connect+ if it had the hardware, but it doesn’t. So maybe the next gen Vivoactive will incorporate Gen5 sensor for ECG. For now, user news: Garmin users in mid-2025 were actually dealing with a syncing issue between Garmin Connect and Strava – a temporary server-side problem that made headlines, but Garmin resolved it. This underlines Garmin’s popularity among those who sync to third-party services. All said, the Vivoactive 6 will be Garmin’s mainstream smartwatch offering likely until at least late 2026. There’s no immediate successor rumor (and certainly nothing officially confirmed) – it just came out. So, anyone buying it now can feel confident it’s the latest. The only possible surprise could be if Garmin merges Vivoactive into the Venu line entirely, but since they priced Venu X1 much higher, they likely will keep them separate. The next thing to watch is possibly a Forerunner 165 (mentioned by Wareable) which might slot just below or around the VA6 price but with more run-focused features (for the really fitness-focused who might choose that over VA6).
• Xiaomi Smart Band 10 Pro – Latest news: The standard Xiaomi Smart Band 10 was officially launched globally on June 27, 2025, which was big news for Xiaomi fans. It brought the larger screen and other upgrades we discussed. Now attention turns to the Smart Band 10 Pro, which Xiaomi has not officially announced yet as of early August 2025. However, based on “last year’s pattern,” Xiaomi tends to release the Pro a few months after the base model. Gadgets & Wearables reports that a Band 10 Pro “feels very likely” and predicts a late summer or early autumn 2025 launch, possibly aligned with IFA Berlin (early September). Indeed, IFA has been a venue for Xiaomi to showcase global wearables in the past. If that timing holds, we might see teasers or leaks in August and a reveal in September. So far, leaks/rumors suggest the Band 10 Pro will obviously include built-in GPS (since the Band 10 kept connected GPS, leaving GPS for the Pro). It will likely stick with the wider smartwatch-like design. The rumor in that article also floated the idea of a barometric altimeter finally being added to the Pro, which would allow floor counting and better elevation tracking – that would be a logical new feature since Band 10 base already got a compass. No concrete leaks on screen size, but maybe a slightly larger or higher-res screen could happen (Band 9 Pro and 8 Pro both were 1.74″ 336×480; they might bump it to, say, 1.82″ or something, but that’s speculation). The battery might also increase if they keep making it larger – Band 9 Pro had 21 days, and if they do add altimeter (which uses minimal power though) or a bigger screen, they might adjust battery accordingly. As for software, Xiaomi’s moves toward HyperOS integration means the Band 10 Pro will likely run a refined version of the OS used in Band 10, possibly with more smarts (but don’t expect app support). There’s also talk in the community about a Band 10 Active or other variants (Xiaomi sometimes puts out a slightly cheaper model for certain markets, like a Band 9 Active which was a stripped down version). But the Pro is the one to watch for top features. Beyond Band 10 Pro: Looking further, Xiaomi will undoubtedly continue its yearly cycle, so a Smart Band 11 next year (2026) is almost certain. In fact, Marko Maslakovic from Gadgets & Wearables already penned an article on “Everything I want to see in the Smart Band 11” – indicating interest in features like possibly even more smartwatch-like capabilities. That’s more wishlist than news, but it shows the trajectory. There are also more competitors cropping up (e.g., Huawei and Honor have their own Band series, and even OnePlus/Carl Pei’s “CMF” sub-brand is launching a budget fitness tracker). Xiaomi will likely aim to maintain leadership in the budget segment by packing in as much tech as possible. As of now, the rumor mill on Band 10 Pro doesn’t indicate any delays or issues – it’s expected, just not officially confirmed. We should also keep an eye on availability news: The Band 9 Pro did go global, and since Xiaomi already launched Band 10 global, presumably Band 10 Pro will follow suit a bit later (the Gadgets & Wearables piece implies a few months after Chinese release). So perhaps by late 2025, we’ll see it in Europe. Lastly, Xiaomi’s wearables were mentioned in context with new OS updates – an AndroidAuthority piece called the Band 10 “the best under $50” and noted improvements, meaning Xiaomi is getting noticed in mainstream Western media too. So the brand is likely to keep pushing these globally.

In summary, Fitbit Charge 6 is current and still getting updates; any successor is speculative but possible in late 2025 (no guarantees). Garmin Vivoactive 6 is freshly released and will be current through 2025; Garmin’s focus will be on supporting it and rolling out Connect+ features. Xiaomi Smart Band 10 Pro is the anticipated upcoming model – expected to launch within the next month or two (as of Aug 2025) in China, bringing GPS and more to the table, and likely reaching international markets by year’s end. Each of these devices is at a different point in its lifecycle, but all are among the top choices in their categories for 2025.

Sources:

• Official specifications and reviews for factual details (design, display, features, etc.).
• Expert review commentary from Tom’s Guide, TechRadar, Wareable, etc., to highlight pros/cons and real-world impressions.
• Latest news from reputable outlets (Forbes, Gadgets & Wearables) on firmware updates and future product timing.