LIM Center, Aleje Jerozolimskie 65/79, 00-697 Warsaw, Poland
+48 (22) 364 58 00
ts@ts2.pl

Fujifilm X-S20 vs Canon EOS R50 V vs Nikon Z30 – The Ultimate 2025 Mirrorless Camera Showdown

Fujifilm X-S20 vs Canon EOS R50 V vs Nikon Z30 – The Ultimate 2025 Mirrorless Camera Showdown

0
Fujifilm X-S20 vs Canon EOS R50 V vs Nikon Z30 – The Ultimate 2025 Mirrorless Camera Showdown

The Fujifilm X-S20, Canon EOS R50 V, and Nikon Z30 are three of the hottest mirrorless APS-C cameras on the market in 2025. Each targets photographers and content creators looking for a compact, affordable camera with serious capabilities. In this in-depth comparison, we’ll break down how these cameras stack up – from image quality and autofocus to video features, design, and value – and highlight what experts are saying. We’ll also touch on other new and upcoming models you should know about. Which camera comes out on top? Read on – the answer may surprise you!

Overview of These Mirrorless Cameras

Fujifilm X-S20: Released in mid-2023, the X-S20 is the successor to Fuji’s popular X-S10. It’s a mid-range 26MP APS-C mirrorless camera that packs in-body image stabilization (IBIS), 8 fps mechanical burst (up to 20 fps electronic), and Fuji’s signature X-Trans sensor technology petapixel.com petapixel.com. Priced around $1,299 body-only at launch apotelyt.com apotelyt.com, the X-S20 targets enthusiast photographers and hybrid shooters who want strong stills and video performance in a compact body. It features a high-quality 2.36M-dot electronic viewfinder (EVF) and Fuji’s extensive lineup of X-mount lenses. Reviewers have called the X-S20 one of the most compelling mid-range cameras, with excellent 7-stop IBIS and long battery life (up to ~750 shots) thanks to a new larger battery petapixel.com petapixel.com.

Canon EOS R50 V: Launched in early 2025, the R50 V is a spin-off of 2023’s EOS R50. Canon designed the R50 V specifically with vloggers and video creators in mind. It shares the same 24.2MP APS-C sensor and DIGIC X processor as the R50, but omits the EVF to achieve an even more compact form and lower cost (around $649 body-only) apotelyt.com apotelyt.com. Instead of a viewfinder, you compose via the fully articulating 3” touchscreen. Canon also upgraded the video specs: the R50 V can shoot uncropped 4K at 60p in 10-bit with Canon Log 3, a big step up from the original R50’s 4K/30p limit videomaker.com dpreview.com. It’s packed with creator-friendly touches like a front-facing record button and even a secondary tripod mount on the side for vertical shooting videomaker.com. Canon explicitly markets the R50 V as complementary to the R50, not a replacement, geared toward those who want “a hybrid camera with a more video-focused design” videomaker.com. In other words, it’s an entry-level content creation powerhouse for beginners and hobbyists, while still being a capable little stills camera.

Nikon Z30: Nikon’s Z30 arrived back in mid-2022 as their smallest, most affordable mirrorless camera. It sports a 20.9MP APS-C sensor (borrowed from Nikon’s D500/Z50 heritage) and was aimed squarely at YouTubers, streamers, and anyone wanting a simple interchangeable-lens camera for vlogging or travel. With a launch price around $700 (often now on sale for less, even under $600 with a kit lens) digitalcameraworld.com digitalcameraworld.com, the Z30 undercuts the others on cost. It forgoes an EVF entirely – you use the flip-out rear screen for framing – and like the R50 V, it has a lightweight build optimized for on-the-go use. Despite being a budget model, the Z30’s magnesium alloy body gives it a solid, non-plasticky feel that impressed reviewers, especially compared to other entry-level cameras digitalcameraworld.com digitalcameraworld.com. It maxes out at 4K/30p video (no 4K/60) and lacks advanced video profiles like Log or 10-bit output dpreview.com. Nikon positioned the Z30 as a step-up from smartphones for beginners, and a compact vlogging workhorse, albeit one with more limited bells and whistles than the newer Fuji and Canon.

Image Quality and Photography Performance

All three cameras deliver very good image quality for still photography, but there are some differences in sensors and features that affect shooting.

Resolution and Sensors: The Fujifilm X-S20’s 26MP X-Trans sensor provides the highest resolution of the trio (6240 x 4160 pixels), versus 24MP on the Canon and 20.9MP on the Nikon cameradecision.com. In practice, the difference between 26 and 24 megapixels is minor, but the Fuji will capture slightly more detail – beneficial if you plan to crop or make larger prints. The X-S20 uses a BSI X-Trans IV sensor known for excellent dynamic range and color, especially paired with Fuji’s film simulation modes. Its image quality has been lauded as “high-quality, with good dynamic range and lovely colors” petapixel.com petapixel.com. The Canon R50 V and Nikon Z30 use more traditional CMOS Bayer sensors. Despite the Nikon’s lower pixel count, all three yield sharp, vibrant images with APS-C sized sensors that far outperform smartphones or point-and-shoots.

Autofocus: In terms of autofocus for stills, Canon’s Dual Pixel CMOS AF II system in the R50 V is a standout – fast and confident with 4,500+ AF points and smart subject detection for people, animals, and vehicles videomaker.com dpreview.com. Reviewers found the R50 V’s autofocus “reliable at keeping whatever we were shooting in focus,” even tracking subjects as they move dpreview.com dpreview.com. Fujifilm has significantly improved its autofocus algorithms in the X-S20 thanks to the new X-Processor 5. It gains subject-detect AF modes (humans, animals, birds, cars, etc.) similar to its higher-end siblings. While the X-S20’s AF is greatly improved and quite capable for most uses, experts note that Canon (and Sony) still maintain an edge in AF tracking, especially for fast action or unrecognized subjects dpreview.com. Nikon’s Z30 uses an older 209-point hybrid AF system. It’s decent for static subjects and face detection in video, but is the least sophisticated of the three. The Z30 can shoot at up to 11 fps burst, on par with the Canon’s ~12 fps; the Fuji’s mechanical burst is a bit slower at 8 fps (though it can hit 20 fps with electronic shutter) cameradecision.com. For sports or fast-moving subjects, none of these are sports-specialist cameras, but the Canon and Fuji will perform more consistently. (If action shooting is a priority, Nikon’s newer Z50 II offers faster performance and tracking – more on that later digitalcameraworld.com.)

In-Body Stabilization: One big differentiator is stabilization. The Fujifilm X-S20 is the only one with IBIS, rated up to 7 stops of shake reduction cameradecision.com. This is a huge advantage for handheld low-light shots or steadying telephoto lenses. PetaPixel highlighted the X-S20’s upgraded IBIS as a “positive selling point,” noting Fuji boosted it from 6 to 7 stops on this model petapixel.com. In contrast, the Canon R50 V and Nikon Z30 have no in-body stabilizer – they rely on optically stabilized lenses or digital stabilization for video. Canon and Nikon do offer digital IS modes, but those crop the image and can’t match true IBIS for still photos. If you foresee shooting a lot of handheld photos in dim light (like indoor scenes, night cityscapes, etc.), the X-S20’s stabilized sensor is a major plus that lets you use slower shutter speeds without blur.

Viewfinder and Shooting Experience: For traditional photographers, the presence of an electronic viewfinder can be important. Here the X-S20 stands out as the only one of the three that has a built-in EVF. Its 2.36-million-dot OLED EVF is fairly standard for mid-range cameras and “similar to what the competition features” in this class petapixel.com petapixel.com. An EVF is great for bright sunny days or for extra stability by holding the camera to your eye. Neither the Canon R50 V nor Nikon Z30 include a viewfinder at all – a clear design choice to keep size and cost down for those models. If you prefer composing through an eye-level finder, the Fuji is the obvious choice here. (Notably, the original Canon R50 did have an EVF; the R50 V removed it to cater to vloggers. And Nikon’s slightly higher-tier Z50 model includes an EVF, whereas the Z30 does not digitalcameraworld.com.) Many vloggers are fine framing with the flip-out rear screen, but still photographers coming from DSLRs might miss having a viewfinder on the Canon or Nikon.

In summary, all three cameras can produce excellent photos. The X-S20 offers the most enthusiast-friendly stills experience with its IBIS, slightly higher resolution, EVF, and Fuji’s renowned color profiles. The EOS R50 V, while designed for video, still delivers Canon’s dependable image quality and class-leading autofocus in a very compact package – it’s a great beginner’s photo camera as well. The Nikon Z30 can certainly take high-quality images (it shares its sensor with the well-regarded Nikon Z50), and it doesn’t “feel like a cheap camera” despite the low price digitalcameraworld.com. However, Nikon’s aging AF system and lack of a viewfinder or stabilization mean pure stills shooters might find it a notch below the other two in photography chops.

Video and Vlogging Features

If you’re a video creator or plan to do a lot of vlogging, Canon’s R50 V and Fuji’s X-S20 really shine with their advanced video specs – while Nikon’s Z30 starts to show its age. Here’s how they compare:

Resolution and Frame Rates: Fujifilm pushed the envelope by giving the X-S20 some serious video firepower. It can record 4K (UHD) up to 60p using the full sensor width, and even offers a 6.2K “open-gate” mode (using the entire 3:2 sensor area) up to 30p petapixel.com. In fact, the X-S20 inherited many video features from Fuji’s higher-end models: you can shoot in 10-bit 4:2:2 internally and even output 6.2K RAW video (ProRes RAW or BRAW) via HDMI to an external recorder petapixel.com. Fuji also added the F-Log2 profile for up to 13+ stops of dynamic range capture. This essentially makes the X-S20 one of the most capable video cameras under $1500, akin to having “5 cameras in one body” as one cinematography reviewer put it cined.com. Meanwhile, the Canon EOS R50 V was designed explicitly for enhanced video – it can finally do 4K at 60fps (the original R50 was limited to 4K30). Canon records oversampled 6K->4K for sharp details at up to 30p, and uses a slight sensor crop for 4K60. The R50 V also captures 10-bit 4:2:2 video in either HDR PQ or C-Log3 profile, giving creators much more flexibility in color grading than the 8-bit footage of the older R50 videomaker.com. It even supports high frame rate 1080p at 120fps for slow-motion. By contrast, Nikon’s Z30 tops out at 4K 30fps and 1080p 120fps. It cannot do 4K60 at all – you’d have to drop to 1080p for any slow-mo higher than 30p dpreview.com. The Z30 also lacks any Log profile or 10-bit output; it’s limited to 8-bit H.264 footage (though it does have Nikon’s flat “Picture Control Flat” profile for a mild dynamic range boost). For a casual vlogger, 4K30 and 1080/120 may be sufficient, but in 2025 the Z30’s video specs look notably behind the curve.

Image Stabilization for Video: None of these cameras has in-body stabilization except the Fuji X-S20 – and that IBIS benefits video as well, especially for hand-held shooting. The X-S20’s IBIS combined with digital IS can effectively smooth out walking footage, though for true run-and-gun vlogging a gimbal is still helpful. The Canon R50 V and Nikon Z30 rely on electronic stabilization (digital IS) and lens-based VR. Canon offers two EIS modes (“Normal” and “Enhanced”), but as DPReview tests found, the enhanced mode crops heavily (over 2.2x in 4K60) and both modes can introduce a jello-like “wobbly” look with too much movement dpreview.com dpreview.com. Since the R50 V lacks IBIS, using an optically stabilized lens or a grip/tripod is wise for steady video. Nikon’s Z30 similarly can use the e-VR digital stabilization, which crops in a bit. Overall, the Fuji has the advantage of true IBIS for video, whereas the R50 V and Z30 will require more reliance on stabilized lenses or post-processing to achieve smooth footage when handheld.

Recording Limits and Heat: One improvement in these newer models is longer recording times. Canon advertises the R50 V can record up to 2 hours in 4K (or 1 hour in high-frame-rate 4K) before hitting its limit or battery depletion videomaker.com videomaker.com. This is far beyond the old 30-minute cap of earlier cameras. The X-S20 similarly does not have a hard 30-min limit and, thanks to a more efficient processor (and even an optional clip-on fan accessory), can record long takes – for example, open-gate 6.2K/30p for around 60 minutes or more under the right conditions. Nikon’s Z30 actually touted no recording limit aside from battery/thermals; in practice it can usually do about 75-125 minutes of 1080p or around 35 minutes of 4K before needing a break, depending on conditions (and you can run it off USB power for longer streams). None of these cameras is known for severe overheating in typical use, but shooting 4K60 or 6K video continuously will warm them up. The bottom line: all three can handle long-form video better than older-generation cameras, but the Canon and Fuji give you higher quality options during those long takes.

Audio and Connectivity: For serious video work, audio inputs/outputs and connectivity make a difference. Here, the Canon R50 V really stands out given its price – it includes both a microphone jack and a headphone jack for monitoring dpreview.com dpreview.com. This is a rarity in entry-level cameras and a big deal for creators who want to ensure their audio is clean while recording. Canon also equipped it with a fast USB-C that can function for webcam UVC output (up to 4K for streaming) dpreview.com. The Fujifilm X-S20 offers a mic input and a USB-C that doubles as a headphone output (via adapter) – a common solution in small Fuji bodies. It too can be used as a webcam via Fuji’s software. Nikon’s Z30 has a microphone input but notably lacks a headphone jack, so you can’t monitor audio live dpreview.com dpreview.com. All three have micro HDMI ports to output video to an external recorder or monitor (Canon’s can output 4K up to 60p; Fuji up to 6.2K RAW; Nikon up to 4K30, all 8-bit output in Nikon’s case).

Vlogging and Usability: Canon clearly had vloggers in mind when designing the R50 V’s ergonomics. As noted, they added a front-facing tally/record button – a “pro-vlogging creature comfort” that many cameras oddly lack videomaker.com – making it easy to start recording while pointing the camera at yourself. The R50 V also has that extra tripod socket on the side for mounting vertically (great for Instagram/Reels/TikTok creators who want to film vertical without an L-bracket) videomaker.com. The fully articulating screens on all three cameras let you flip the display toward the front for selfie framing. Fuji and Canon’s screens are 3.0” touchscreens (1.84M dots on Fuji, ~1.04M dots on Canon), and Nikon’s is a 3.0” 1.04M-dot vari-angle as well – all fairly similar and effective for vlogging and menu navigation. Each camera can also serve as a USB webcam.

One consideration is rolling shutter performance – essentially how much the image distorts with quick pans. The Canon R50 V, while excellent in many ways, does have noticeably poor rolling shutter in its full-width 4K modes (the downside of reading a 24MP sensor relatively slowly) dpreview.com dpreview.com. Fast motion can produce the “jello” skew effect. Interestingly, in the R50 V’s cropped 4K/60 mode the rolling shutter is much less (since it’s reading a smaller area) dpreview.com. Fujifilm’s X-S20, using a 26MP BSI sensor, also isn’t immune to rolling shutter, but when shooting in its 6.2K/30 open-gate mode it actually reads the sensor faster (about 1/30s per frame) than Canon does in 4K/24, giving the Fuji an edge for fast action video. Nikon’s Z30, with only 20MP to read, has fairly decent rolling shutter handling at 4K/30 (better than the Canon’s full 4K), but since it lacks 4K/60, it can’t leverage a faster readout at higher fps.

Overall in video: The Fujifilm X-S20 offers the most pro-level video features (10-bit internal, 4K60 + 6.2K modes, F-Log2, external RAW, IBIS) making it a true hybrid shooter’s dream in this class. The Canon EOS R50 V is arguably the best beginner video camera in terms of value – it gives creators 10-bit 4K60p and top-notch autofocus in a $700 package, which Videomaker dubbed “the best video camera for beginners” in 2025 videomaker.com videomaker.com. The R50 V lacks a few higher-end options of the Fuji (no 6K or external RAW), but it nails what most YouTubers and streamers need. The Nikon Z30, while capable of producing nice 4K30 video, struggles to keep up with the newer cameras. As one expert pointed out, the Z30 can’t do 4K60 at all and doesn’t support 10-bit or Log profiles, “meaning you’ll be more limited in post when it comes to color grading” dpreview.com. It’s a solid little video camera for basic needs, but more of a no-frills approach compared to the feature-packed Canon and Fuji.

Design, Handling and Build Quality

All three cameras are compact and lightweight, but they each have a slightly different design philosophy:

  • Fujifilm X-S20: The largest and heaviest of the bunch, the X-S20 weighs about 491 g (1.08 lb) and has a more substantial handgrip and front/rear command dials for a DSLR-like feel apotelyt.com. It measures 127 x 85 x 65 mm in size cameradecision.com – still very compact, but about 30% bigger and heavier than the Canon R50 V. Fuji used a partially magnesium alloy construction with a solid feel; however, note that the X-S20 is not weather-sealed (nor are the Canon or Nikon) apotelyt.com. Fuji enthusiasts will appreciate the X-S20’s control layout: unlike Fuji’s retro-styled X-T series, the X-S20 uses modern PSAM mode dial and three command dials that are highly customizable petapixel.com petapixel.com. Reviewers loved the handling, saying the grip is very comfortable(slightly enlarged to accommodate the bigger battery) and the buttons more refined than the previous model petapixel.com. At ~17 oz, the X-S20 still “feels very lightweight” for what it offers petapixel.com, and its deeper grip and joystick make for confident operation in shooting. It’s a camera you can carry all day, but it will occupy a bit more bag space than the truly tiny Z30 or R50 V.
  • Canon EOS R50 V: Canon engineered the R50 V to be extraordinarily compact – it weighs just 370 g (0.82 lb) and measures ~119 x 74 x 45 mm apotelyt.com. That small design is achieved partly by removing the EVF (compared to the original R50 which was slightly taller to house a viewfinder). As a result, the R50 V is pocketable in a jacket pocket with a small lens, and exceptionally travel-friendly. The trade-off is a very minimal grip and fewer external controls – it’s designed to be simple and approachable. There’s a single top dial, and most settings are changed via the touchscreen or Q menu rather than lots of buttons. For many beginners that’s fine, though advanced users might find it a bit limiting. The R50 V uses a plastic (polycarbonate) shell construction; it feels solid enough, but not as tank-like as higher-end bodies. Interestingly, despite its tiny size, Canon managed to keep the same battery as some larger EOS models (the LP-E17). CIPA-rated battery life is around 390 shots per charge apotelyt.com apotelyt.com, which is decent for a small camera – and users report real-world usage often exceeds that. One nice touch: Canon put the R50 V’s memory card slot alongside the battery under the camera, which isn’t ideal on a tripod, but the R50 V has that unique side tripod mount option which can alleviate having to remove it from a tripod to swap cards/batteries in some scenarios. Overall, the R50 V’s ergonomics are optimized for video (flip screen, record button, etc.) and one-handed use, rather than providing a traditional photographer’s experience. It’s ultra-lightweight and easy to carry, but with less grip and no EVF you’ll mostly use it like an upgraded smartphone or point-and-shoot in handling.
  • Nikon Z30: The Z30 sits between the other two in size. It weighs about 405 g and measures 128 x 74 x 60 mm cameradecision.com. That makes it a bit larger and heavier than the Canon, but still smaller than the Fuji. One notable aspect is the deep grip – Nikon gave the Z30 a relatively chunky handgrip which many users with larger hands appreciate for secure holding digitalcameraworld.com digitalcameraworld.com. As Digital Camera World noted, the larger grip means it won’t slide into pants pockets, “but makes for a comfortable hold while still leaving the camera impressively small” digitalcameraworld.com. The Z30 has a very spare control scheme (no mode dial – modes are selected via a button and command dial – and only a few buttons on the back). It’s clear Nikon intended beginners to mostly rely on auto modes or simple adjustments. Like the Canon, the build is a mix of polycarbonate, but Nikon did use a magnesium alloy chassis internally, which contributes to a more robust feel. Hillary Grigonis wrote that the Z30 “doesn’t feel plasticky like a lot of budget cameras do” specifically because of that metal build digitalcameraworld.com digitalcameraworld.com. There is no EVF, and the flash is also omitted (none of the three have a built-in flash, incidentally). The Z30’s battery (EN-EL25) is CIPA-rated for about 330 shots per charge cameradecision.com cameradecision.com, the weakest of the three, but still sufficient for casual use (and USB-C charging can keep it running). The lack of an EVF on the Z30 means it, like the Canon, is primarily a LCD-based shooter. One advantage Nikon has: a fully decluttering interface in “video mode” and a prominent tally lamp on the front for recording. Handling-wise, users migrating from Nikon DSLRs will find the Z30 quite stripped-down, but it’s straightforward for its target audience.

In terms of style, Fuji’s X-S20 is the most “photographer-centric” design (comfortable grip, viewfinder, lots of dials), Canon’s R50 V is the most “content-creator-centric” (sleek, minimal, designed to be used at arm’s length or on a tripod), and Nikon’s Z30 is somewhere in the middle with a blend of compactness and a solid grip. All three have fully articulating screens, which is fantastic for creative angles in stills and a must for self-recording video. None of these bodies are weather-sealed, so you’ll want to be a bit careful in rain or dusty environments. Each camera is available in a black finish; Fuji also sometimes sells a silver variant in other models, but the X-S20 is only black.

One last note on viewfinders and alternatives: If you love the idea of the tiny Canon R50 V but really want an EVF, you might consider the original Canon EOS R50 (2023) which is very similar in specs but includes a built-in 2.36M-dot EVF (and built-in flash) – though it lacks the 4K60 and Log of the “V” model. Likewise, Nikon shooters who want a small body with a viewfinder might lean toward the Nikon Z50 or newer Z50 II, which have EVFs and more controls while remaining relatively compact digitalcameraworld.com digitalcameraworld.com. It all comes down to whether ultimate portability or having a viewfinder (and extra controls) matters more to you.

Lenses and Lens Ecosystem

When choosing a camera system, it’s important to consider not just the body, but the lenses available for it – especially if you plan to grow your kit. This is an area where Fujifilm has an inherent advantage, while Canon and Nikon are catching up with their newer APS-C mirrorless systems:

  • Fujifilm X-S20 (X Mount): Fujifilm’s X-mount system has been around for over a decade and is extremely well-established with lenses. There are dozens of native Fuji X lenses, from affordable primes and kit zooms to high-end professional glass, covering essentially every focal length you might need. Fujifilm itself offers excellent lenses (the XF lineup), and third-party support from Sigma, Tamron, Viltrox, etc., has grown too. With an X-S20, you can get a compact setup like the XF 27mm f/2.8 pancake for walking around, a fast portrait lens like the 56mm f/1.2 for shallow depth of field, or even Fuji’s 100-400mm for wildlife – all without adapters. Simply put, the Fujifilm X ecosystem is very robust and many lenses are designed specifically for APS-C, keeping them smaller and cheaper than full-frame glass. Experts often praise Fuji’s APS-C lens selection as class-leading – one review noted the “especially robust lens ecosystem” as a strength of Fuji compared to newer systems dpreview.com. So if lens variety (especially fast primes or specialty lenses) matters to you, Fuji is a great choice.
  • Canon EOS R50 V (RF Mount): Canon’s mirrorless RF mount is relatively young (launched in 2018 for full-frame, and in 2022 for APS-C RF-S bodies). For APS-C users, Canon has introduced a handful of RF-S lenses, like the compact RF-S 18-45mm kit zoom and RF-S 55-210mm telephoto. These are decent starter lenses. In late 2023 Canon also released an RF-S 10-18mm ultrawide zoom for vlogging. However, the native RF-S lens selection is still small – under 10 lenses as of 2025 – and largely covering basic focal lengths. The good news is the R50 V can use the entire lineup of full-frame RF lenses too. Canon has many excellent RF lenses, but they tend to be very expensive and larger, since they’re designed for full-frame. For budget-conscious R50 V owners, this is tricky: Canon has not (yet) opened RF mount to third-party AF lens makers, so you’re mostly limited to Canon’s own lenses. There are some workarounds: manual lenses from companies like Viltrox/Laowa, or using older DSLR lenses via an EF-to-RF adapter (which Canon supports fully). An adapted EF-S 50mm f/1.8 or EF 70-300mm, for instance, can work fine and is a budget-friendly way to expand reach. But if staying native, at this moment Canon’s APS-C lens catalog is the most limited of the three systems. This doesn’t mean you can’t take great photos – the available lenses (and RF full-frame lenses) cover most needs – just that Fuji and even Nikon offer more native APS-C choices for now. On the flip side, Canon’s RF lenses, particularly the new primes like the RF 24mm, 28mm, 50mm, etc., are very compact and make a lot of sense on the R50 V for a lightweight kit.
  • Nikon Z30 (Z Mount DX): Nikon’s Z mount was also introduced in 2018 (full-frame) and extended to APS-C with the Z50 and Z30. Nikon has released a modest selection of DX-format Z lenses such as the Nikkor Z DX 16-50mm kit lens (a very slim collapsible zoom that pairs great with Z30), a DX 50-250mm tele-zoom, and a 12-28mm DX wide zoom for vloggers. Additionally, Nikon recently launched a DX 24mm f/1.7 prime, giving Z30 users a bright normal lens. Altogether, though, Nikon’s native APS-C lens lineup is also quite limited – only around 4-5 dedicated DX lenses in 2025. They have promised more are coming. In the meantime, the Z30 of course can use any full-frame Nikon Z lenses. Nikon’s full-frame lens range is steadily growing and includes some reasonably priced options like the compact 40mm f/2, 28mm f/2.8, etc., which work well on DX (albeit at longer equivalent focal lengths). Like Canon, Nikon allows use of older DSLR lenses via the FTZ adapter – you could mount Nikon F-mount lenses (with autofocus support for AF-S/AF-P types). So, a Z30 user might adapt a classic Nikon 50mm f/1.8G or a budget 70-300mm. Unlike Canon, Nikon does allow third-party autofocus lenses in Z-mount, and companies like Sigma and Tamron have started to release a few – Tamron’s 17-70mm f/2.8 for DX, for instance. But as of now, Fujifilm still wins for native APS-C lens selection hands down. Nikon’s DX lens set is small but covers the basics; fortunately the kit 16-50mm is optically quite good and extremely compact (making the Z30 + 16-50mm a great walking-around combo).

In summary, if you want a camera system you can invest in and have tons of native lens choices – from fisheye to macro to fast portrait primes – Fujifilm X-S20 is the clear winner. Fujifilm’s dedication to APS-C means most of its lenses are built for this sensor size and the system is very mature. Canon R50 V users will have superb image quality with Canon’s lenses, but should be aware that the affordable lens choices are currently limited to a few zooms; you might end up adapting lenses or saving up for pricier RF glass as your needs grow. Nikon Z30 sits somewhere in between: a bit more native APS-C lens development than Canon (and more on the horizon, like a rumored DX 35mm or primes), but still limited as of now – though at least third-party Z-mount lenses are expanding. Both Canon and Nikon presumably will flesh out their APS-C lens lineups in the coming years, but Fuji’s head start is hard to beat.

Battery Life and Endurance

A quick note on battery life and shooting endurance: thanks to its larger battery, the Fuji X-S20 has by far the longest battery life of the three. It’s rated at approx. 750 shots per charge (CIPA), which is exceptional for a mirrorless camera apotelyt.com. In real-world use, many shooters easily get over 1000 frames on a single charge unless doing heavy video. This is because Fuji moved to the high-capacity NP-W235 battery (same as in the X-T4/X-T5), whereas the X-S10 had a smaller cell. If you hate carrying spare batteries, the X-S20 is a breath of fresh air.

The Canon R50 V, using the LP-E17, manages around 350–400 shots per charge in testing apotelyt.com apotelyt.com. That’s quite respectable given the small battery – efficiency gains from the Digic X and no power-hungry EVF help here. It should comfortably last a day of casual shooting or a few hours of off-and-on vlogging. The Nikon Z30 is CIPA-rated for roughly 330 shots with the EN-EL25 cameradecision.com. In practice, users report the Z30’s battery drains a bit quicker if doing a lot of video or wireless transfer, so having a spare is a good idea for day-long outings.

All three cameras support USB-C power delivery, meaning you can charge in-camera or even operate the camera with a power bank or continuous power source. For extended recording (say, streaming or long interviews), being able to run off USB power is a huge convenience. For instance, one R50 V user noted they could run the camera for 10+ hours using a USB PD battery pack, effectively bypassing the internal battery limitation dpreview.com. Nikon’s Z30 similarly can be powered via USB while in use (just note it uses micro USB on some older models, but I believe Z30 has USB-C). Fujifilm X-S20 can also charge and power via USB-C, and Fuji even sells an optional fan accessory if you truly need to run long video takes with minimal heat buildup.

In short, Fuji X-S20 is the champ in battery stamina for stills, but all three can be kept running with external USB power for longer projects. If you’re traveling, the Fuji might need one less spare battery than the Canon/Nikon. But all of them are fairly modern in offering on-the-go charging to mitigate short battery life – a welcome feature compared to older cameras.

Pricing and Value

For many buyers, price is a big part of the decision. Here’s how the cost and value proposition of these cameras compare:

  • Nikon Z30: As of 2025, the Z30 is often the cheapest of the three by a noticeable margin. Its MSRP for the body is around $700, but it’s frequently on sale. Recently, kits with the 16-50mm lens have been advertised around $600 or even lower digitalcameraworld.com digitalcameraworld.com. We even saw a deal at £538 (~$575) for the kit in mid-2025 digitalcameraworld.com digitalcameraworld.com. Nikon also offers refurbished deals (sometimes < $500 with a lens) reddit.com. At these prices, the Z30 is a tremendous budget value – you’re getting an APS-C 4K camera for the price of some high-end point-and-shoots. If absolute low cost is key, the Z30 is hard to beat among name-brand interchangeable lens cameras. The trade-offs are the lower specs and older tech we discussed, but from a pure value perspective, discounted Z30 kits are a steal for beginners. Who is it best for? Students, casual shooters, or those who want an affordable second camera for travel/vlogging will find the Z30 very appealing. As DCW put it, “buy it if you want something affordable and small that still takes great images. Avoid it if you want a viewfinder or need to shoot fast action” digitalcameraworld.com digitalcameraworld.com.
  • Canon EOS R50 V: The R50 V launched at $699 (body only) and around $929 with a kit lens (RF-S 18-45mm) dpreview.com. This pricing is extremely aggressive considering the features – it’s only ~$50 more than the original R50’s launch price, yet adds 10-bit video and other upgrades. Reviewers have lauded the value for moneyhere: you get Canon’s excellent Dual Pixel AF, uncropped 4K60, and a handy feature set at a price well below more advanced models. In fact, Canon undercut Fuji’s X-S20 by a wide margin on price – the Fuji is nearly double the cost. The R50 V is arguably in a class of its own for video features under $700. It earned a DPReview Silver Award with an 84% score, in part because of this strong value/performance ratio dpreview.com. For someone with a firm ~$800 budget looking for a do-it-all starter camera, the R50 V might be the best bang for the buck. You will likely want to budget for at least one additional lens (the tiny 18-45mm kit is okay to start, but you may crave something like the RF 50mm f/1.8 or RF-S 55-210mm for more creative reach). The good news is those lenses are relatively affordable, and even adding one still keeps the total system cost around the $1000 mark. In summary: The R50 V offers outstanding value, especially for hybrid shooters – you’d be hard-pressed to find another camera this cheap that offers this level of video quality and solid stills performance dpreview.com dpreview.com. The main limitation at this price is the simple body design (no EVF, single control dial), but if you can live with that, it’s a lot of camera for the money.
  • Fujifilm X-S20: With an MSRP of $1,299 (body), the X-S20 is the priciest of the trio. Even the kit with a basic zoom (XF 18-55 or 15-45) will run around $1,399-$1,499. So we’re talking roughly double the cost of the Canon or Nikon kits. That said, it’s still considered excellent value in the mid-range segment for what it delivers. PetaPixel’s review literally positions the X-S20 as “making a case for the best camera under $1,500” petapixel.com, meaning it competes strongly with cameras at or above its price. When you compare it to slightly higher models (like Sony a6700 at $1,400 or Canon EOS R10 at $980), the Fuji holds its own or beats them in features. If your budget allows, the X-S20 gives you a more premium build, IBIS, an EVF, class-leading battery life, and very advanced video/stills capabilities – essentially bridging into the high-end territory at a still modest price. It’s worth noting that Fuji often has promotions; by 2025 we might see the X-S20 discounted a bit or bundled with a lens. Also, consider the long-term lens costs – Fuji’s lenses range from affordable to pricey, but many midrange options (like the XF 35mm f/2, XF 18-55mm f/2.8-4) are reasonably priced and excellent quality. So, the X-S20 is a bigger initial investment, but you’re getting a camera that can conceivably serve a serious hobbyist or semi-pro for years without feeling limiting. Value verdict: The X-S20 is worth it if you utilize its extra features – if you just need a casual camera, you might not need to spend this much. But if you appreciate the better build, EVF, IBIS, and superior video options, it absolutely delivers for the price and undercuts many full-frame cameras offering similar capabilities.

In summary, Canon’s R50 V and Nikon’s Z30 cater to budget-conscious buyers and offer tremendous value – the Z30 being the rock-bottom price option (especially on sale) and the R50 V giving the most “specs per dollar.” Fuji’s X-S20 costs more but brings higher-end features into the midrange; it’s a value in the sense of what you get for $1,299, but it’s not trying to compete on low price. Depending on your budget, you really have a tiered choice: ~$600 (Z30 kit) gets you in the game, ~$800-900 (R50 V kit) gets you a very well-balanced hybrid setup, and ~$1,400 (X-S20 kit) gets you a more advanced tool with fewer compromises.

Other Competing and Upcoming Models

The camera world moves fast, and it’s worth knowing what other models are out or on the horizon in this category. Aside from the X-S20, R50 V, and Z30, here are a few notable mentions:

  • Nikon Z50 II: Nikon users will be happy to know that in early 2025 Nikon released the Z50 Mark II, an update to the popular Z50. The Z50 II sits above the Z30 and includes a built-in EVF, improved autofocus, and still uses that 20.9MP sensor. It’s a bit larger and pricier than the Z30 (launching around $900 body-only) digitalcameraworld.com digitalcameraworld.com. Reviews note that the “newly launched camera offers excellent autofocus performance for the price” and a very speedy burst rate for an entry model digitalcameraworld.com. Essentially, the Z50 II addresses some of the Z30’s compromises by giving you a viewfinder and more pro-oriented features, while staying under $1k. If you like Nikon’s color and handling but found the Z30 too stripped-down, the Z50 II is an attractive alternative to consider (or the original Z50, which is still available at lower cost now).
  • Canon EOS R100: In mid-2023, Canon quietly introduced the EOS R100, an even more basic sibling to the R50. The R100 is Canon’s cheapest RF-mount camera (launch MSRP $479). It shares the 24MP sensor but omits the articulating screen (fixed LCD), has no EVF, no dual-pixel AF for video (only single-point AF in video), and generally is very bare-bones. It’s aimed at absolute beginners or as a step up from a smartphone. We mention it because if your budget is extremely tight, the R100 is an option – but honestly, the R50 V offers so much more for not a lot more money. The R100 lacks the creative focus of the R50 V and is more of a point-and-shoot style ILC. For most people reading a comparison like this, the R50 V is the far more compelling Canon to get. As for future Canon APS-C models, there’s chatter that Canon might eventually do an “R7 Mark II” or an even higher-end APS-C, but nothing concrete as of 2025. The R50 V itself is brand new, so we don’t expect a replacement soon – any “Mark II” would be a couple years out.
  • Sony options (a6400, a6700, ZV series): We can’t ignore Sony, the other big player in APS-C mirrorless. Sony’s older a6400 (24MP, with EVF) and the video-centric ZV-E10 were direct competitors to the original R50 and Z30. In mid-2023, Sony launched the a6700 ($1,399) which is a high-end 26MP APS-C body with IBIS and 4K60 – but its price puts it above the X-S20. More relevantly, in mid-2024 Sony released the ZV-E10 II, an update to its entry vlog camera, now with a 26MP sensor, uncropped 4K60, and a huge battery (the same battery used in full-frame Sonys) dpreview.com dpreview.com. The ZV-E10 II is an interesting rival to the Canon R50 V: it too has no EVF, and is designed for vloggers. Its strengths are extremely good autofocus (Sony’s renowned Real-Time Tracking) and that massive battery (reportedly over 2 hours of 4K recording on one charge). It also has very low rolling shutter due to a faster sensor readout dpreview.com. On the downside, the Sony’s body is a bit utilitarian and it lacks a still photo flash or viewfinder as well. If you’re shopping around, the Sony ZV-E10 II (launched at $800) is worth comparing to the R50 V. Sony’s lens ecosystem for APS-C is also fairly rich (plus you can use full-frame E-mount lenses). In summary, Sony’s latest APS-C models are strong contenders: the a6400 remains a solid mid-range choice with an EVF, the a6700 is like Fuji’s X-S20 but at a higher price, and the ZV-E10 II is a direct alternative to Canon R50 V for an all-in-one vlogging camera.
  • Other Mirrorless Cameras: If none of these APS-C mirrorless quite fit, there are a few other directions you could look. OM System OM-5 (from late 2022) is a Micro Four Thirds camera that’s very compact and offers weather sealing and a huge lens range (being MFT, sensor is smaller though). It made DCW’s list of top small cameras alongside the ones we’ve discussed digitalcameraworld.com. Panasonic’s new Lumix S5 IIX / S9 (rumored compact full-frame models) are options if you consider going full-frame, but those are larger and pricier (and not APS-C). Nikon also has a retro-inspired APS-C model, the Z fc, which shares the Z50’s guts but in a stylish body; a successor called Zf is rumored, though that might be full-frame.
  • Possible upcoming releases: The question always arises – should you wait for the next model? In this fast-paced market, there are always rumors. As of mid-2025, Fujifilm likely won’t replace the X-S20 until maybe 2026-27 (the X-S line seems to have a 2-3 year cycle). Canon could potentially release an “R50 Mark II” or an “R100 V” eventually, but nothing concrete has leaked. Nikon might be eyeing a Z30 Mark II given the heavy discounting of the current Z30 – some watchers speculate a refresh could be coming since the Z30 is now often sold at nearly half its original price reddit.com youtube.com. If a Z30 II comes, one would hope for 4K60 and maybe an updated sensor. But again, that’s speculative. The Nikon Z50 II just came out, so Nikon’s focus might be there. Sony will likely continue iterating their ZV line and might update the a6400 eventually. But none of these rumored future models are so imminent or so drastically different that they should stop you from buying one of the current choices if you need a camera now. All three cameras we compared – X-S20, R50 V, Z30 – are excellent and available today, and for most users will remain capable tools for years to come.

Conclusion: Which Camera Should You Choose?

After this deep dive, it’s clear there is no one-size-fits-all winner – each camera shines for different users:

  • Choose the Fujifilm X-S20 if you want the most advanced photography and video features in a small package and don’t mind the higher price. It’s the best choice for enthusiast photographers who want IBIS, an EVF, and a robust lens system, as well as hybrid shooters who will utilize 10-bit 4K60 and even 6.2K open-gate video. The X-S20 is a mini powerhouse that can handle almost anything – landscape, travel, portraits, sports in a pinch, high-quality vlogs, you name it. It offers a more sophisticated shooting experience (more dials, longer battery, Fuji’s color science) that experienced users will love. As Chris Niccolls said, Fuji “upgraded the system to provide seven stops of stabilization” and kept improving everything from burst depth to autofocus petapixel.com petapixel.com. The downside is cost and a slightly bulkier body – but you get what you pay for. If you see yourself growing in the hobby or needing those extra features, the X-S20 is worth it and can be a long-term companion.
  • Choose the Canon EOS R50 V if you prioritize value, ease of use, and top-notch video autofocus. It’s the perfect beginner hybrid camera and ideal for content creators on a budget. YouTubers, vloggers, or families making home videos will appreciate the reliable Dual Pixel AF, user-friendly interface, and the fact that Canon essentially took the training wheels off by giving you 10-bit C-Log and uncropped 4K quality normally found in much pricier gear. As Videomaker’s review noted, Canon succeeded in offering a version of the R50 “for those who want a hybrid camera with a more video-focused design” videomaker.com – and they accomplished that mission. Stills are still great (colors, skin tones, etc., are classic Canon quality), though the lack of viewfinder and limited native lens selection are something to consider if you lean heavily into photography. For many, the R50 V hits a sweet spot: small enough to carry anywhere, powerful enough to create with confidence. And at its price, it’s arguably one of the best bang-for-buck choices in 2025. Just remember you might need to invest in some lenses down the road as Canon expands the RF-S lineup.
  • Choose the Nikon Z30 if your budget is very tight or you specifically want a Nikon to complement existing Nikon gear. The Z30 is a capable little camera, especially for straightforward needs: it takes great 20MP photos with that Nikon color output, and records sharp 4K video for your blog or travels. It’s also the only one with a magnesium alloy body, so it has a somewhat more rugged feel which is nice in this class digitalcameraworld.com. For around $550-$600 on sale with a kit lens, it’s a fantastic entry point into interchangeable lens cameras. However, if you can stretch your budget a bit, the reality is that both the Fuji and Canon outclass the Z30 in most areas – sensor stabilization, autofocus sophistication, video features, etc. The Z30 is the choice when cost or simplicity is the overriding factor, or if you’re a Nikon fan who wants the smallest Z-mount camera for casual use. And keep in mind, Nikon has the Z50 II now if you want to stay with Nikon but desire more features. Also, if a Z30 Mark II appears with upgraded specs, it could re-level the playing field. As it stands, the Z30 is a good camera that’s starting to feel a bit dated next to its newer rivals. Even DPReview candidly stated that “the Nikon Z30 struggles to keep up with the newer cameras on this list” of vlogging models dpreview.com.

In the end, all three cameras are quite impressive for what they offer. Your decision should hinge on your priorities:

  • Are you an aspiring filmmaker or an enthusiast who wants the best performance? Go Fuji X-S20.
  • Are you a content creator, vlogger, or first-time camera buyer wanting the easiest path to great results? The Canon R50 V will likely delight you.
  • Are you a bargain hunter or casual shooter who just needs a solid little camera without breaking the bank?The Nikon Z30 can be your affordable friend (or consider paying a bit more for the upgrades in its newer siblings).

Whichever you choose, you’ll be getting a capable mirrorless camera that can grow with you. The good news is that mirrorless technology has advanced so much that even these “entry and mid-range” models pack a punch that was reserved for pro models just a few years ago. As long as you pair them with good lenses and learn their strengths, you can capture fantastic photos and videos with any of these cameras. Happy shooting!

Sources:

Fujifilm vs Canon vs Hasselblad vs Nikon (this is ridiculous)
Watch this video on YouTube.

Tags: , ,

LIM Center, Aleje Jerozolimskie 65/79, 00-697 Warsaw, Poland

ts@ts2.pl

+48 (22) 364 58 00

© 2025 TS2 SPACE Sp. z o.o.

This site uses cookies to deliver services in accordance with the Privacy Policy. You can specify the conditions for storage or access to cookies in your browser.