Logitech MX Master 4 vs. The World: Ultimate Productivity Mouse Showdown

Logitech’s MX Master 4 debuts with haptic feedback and an innovative “Actions Ring” menu, raising the bar for premium productivity mice ^[1] ^[2].
Flagship Specs: 8000 DPI “Darkfield” sensor (tracks even on glass), MagSpeed scroll wheel (up to 1000 lines/sec), ~70-day battery, USB-C fast charging (3 hrs use from 1 min charge) ^[3] ^[4].
Performance & Feel: Delivers precise, ultra-smooth tracking and quiet clicks (90% quieter than MX Master 3) ^[5]. Downside: Heftier 150 g weight (9 g heavier than its predecessor) – great for stability, but noticeable in hand ^[6].
Razer Pro Click V2 ($99) rivals the MX Master series with a comfortable ergonomic shape and gaming-grade tech (30,000 DPI sensor, 1000 Hz polling) ^[7]. Experts call it “the MX Master 3S for gamers,” offering top-notch performance and battery life (weeks per charge) ^[8] ^[9].
Apple Magic Mouse ($79) stands apart with its sleek multi-touch gesture surface instead of a scroll wheel ^[10]. It’s ultra-portable and ambidextrous, but its flat, low profile is famously uncomfortable for long use ^[11]. Apple finally added USB-C charging in 2024, yet the port remains awkwardly on the bottom.
Microsoft Surface Precision Mouse (launch $99, now often ~$60) boasts superb comfort and build quality with an ergonomic design and three extra side buttons. However, reviewers cite laggy performance and subpar software, saying it “leaves you feeling annoyed” despite the premium price ^[12] ^[13].
Latest News: Logitech’s MX Master 4 launched Sep 2025 (after months of leaks ^[14] ^[15]) and is in stock at $119.99/€129.99 ^[16]. Razer introduced its Pro Click V2 in May 2025 (also offering a Vertical edition at $119). Apple is rumored to redesign the Magic Mouse by 2026 with a more ergonomic shape and a relocated charging port ^[17] ^[18] – a long-awaited fix.
Bottom Line: The MX Master 4 packs class-leading features for power users, but strong competitors offer compelling alternatives. Below, we dive into how the MX Master 4 compares on specs, user experience, and value against today’s top productivity mice, plus what’s coming next.

Logitech MX Master 4 – A New Flagship for Productivity

Logitech’s MX Master series has long been the gold standard for productivity mice, and the MX Master 4 is its most advanced iteration yet. Announced in late 2025, this flagship mouse “carries over everything we loved about the 3S” – such as the comfy sculpted shape, dual scroll wheels, multi-device pairing – “while adding haptic feedback and an ‘Action Ring’ menu” for shortcuts ^[19].

Key Features & Improvements: The headline addition is customizable haptic feedback, a first for any MX mouse ^[20]. A vibration motor in the thumb rest provides subtle tactile alerts and confirmations. For example, the mouse can gently rumble when you switch devices, when battery is low, or even when your cursor hits alignment guides in Adobe design apps ^[21]. This “rumble pack for productivity,” as one reviewer quipped, has a lot of potential to make workflows more intuitive ^[22]. Early reviews note it feels natural and helpful, though currently under-utilized until more app integrations arrive ^[23].

The second big innovation is the Actions Ring – a circular on-screen menu activated by a press of the thumb rest button ^[24]. By default, it pops up shortcuts for common tasks (file explorer, screenshot, media controls, emoji panel, etc.) plus a clever “AI prompt” hub ^[25]. With one click, users get instant access to ChatGPT, Microsoft Copilot, Google Bard (Gemini), Perplexity, and other AI tools ^[26]. This ties into Logitech’s Options+ software, which lets you customize the ring with app-specific actions or macros of your choice ^[27]. Notably, you can even use the Actions Ring to switch between up to 3 paired devices – no more flipping the mouse over to hit a tiny channel button ^[28]. Overall, the Actions Ring aims to save time by reducing repetitive tasks: Logitech claims it can cut certain workflows by 33% and mouse travel by 63% according to their studies ^[29] ^[30].

Of course, the MX Master 4 retains the series’ signature capabilities. It still has the MagSpeed electromagnetic scroll wheel up top, which seamlessly shifts from ratcheted scrolling to free-spin mode for zipping through long documents (up to 1,000 lines per second) ^[31]. A secondary horizontal scroll wheel by the thumb handles spreadsheets, timelines, or tool switching. The optical sensor is the same high-end Darkfield 8000 DPI unit introduced in the 3S, meaning it tracks on virtually any surface (even glass) with adjustable sensitivity up to 8K DPI ^[32] ^[33]. The main buttons use new quiet switches – Logitech advertises 90% noise reduction versus the MX Master 3, so each click is very muted yet tactile ^[34]. Like its predecessors, it can connect via Bluetooth or an included wireless receiver, and it pairs with three devices (Windows, macOS, Linux, ChromeOS all supported) with easy switching ^[35].

Connectivity & Battery: One less flashy but important upgrade is in wireless performance. Logitech says the MX Master 4 has “2× stronger” connectivity thanks to an improved 2.4 GHz wireless chip, better antenna placement, and a new USB-C receiver dongle ^[36]. In practice, this should mean a more reliable connection with less chance of dropouts or lag, even in congested office environments (an area where older models occasionally had hiccups). The receiver itself is now USB-C, a welcome change as many modern laptops lack USB-A ports ^[37]. Battery life remains excellent: up to ~70 days on a full charge, and fast-charging via USB-C gives ~3 hours of usage from just 1 minute plugged in ^[38] ^[39]. In real-world terms, most users will only need to recharge every couple of months. (One minor caveat: the box no longer includes a charging cable, assuming you already have USB-C cables handy ^[40].)

Design & Ergonomics: The overall look and shape of the MX Master 4 haven’t strayed far from the tried-and-true MX Master design language. It’s a large, right-handed mouse with a tall apex and a generous thumb rest. New “stain-resistant” matte coatings and a slightly textured surface have been added, intended to resist smudges and be easier to keep clean ^[41]. Logitech also touts more sustainable materials: the thumb wheel is made of a low-carbon aluminum and the plastic shell contains nearly 50% recycled plastic ^[42]. Build quality is solid and premium-feeling, as expected in this price class.

One thing to note is the weight: at about 150 g, the MX Master 4 is even heavier than the 3S (which was ~141 g) ^[43]. This weight gives it a planted, substantial feel that many professionals appreciate for precision work – it won’t slide around too easily. However, if you’re used to lightweight mice (especially many modern gaming mice under 80 g), the MX Master 4 will feel hefty. Tom’s Hardware remarked that “this is a heavy mouse… it does feel fairly substantial as modern rodents go” ^[44]. The added weight likely comes from the haptic motor and beefier battery. For productivity tasks, the mass isn’t a deal-breaker and can even provide more control. But if you occasionally game with your office mouse, you’ll definitely notice the difference – as Tom’s noted, “the MX Master 4 isn’t going to be my first choice at the end of the work day when I fire up Borderlands 4.” ^[45] Logitech is clearly positioning this mouse for work-first use; they have separate gaming mice (like the new G Pro X2 “Superstrike” with its own haptics ^[46]) for those prioritizing fast twitch performance.

Unique Value: All told, the MX Master 4’s combination of features is unparalleled in the productivity mouse market as of 2025. It blends an ergonomic design, best-in-class scroll wheels, multi-computer control (with Logitech Flow/Options+ software allowing even copy-pasting across machines), and now the tactile feedback and Action Ring to speed up complex workflows. It’s a tool designed for power users like software developers, designers, video editors, and anyone who spends all day on a computer and wants to optimize every interaction. Tolya Polyanker, Logitech’s MX series manager, said they “designed MX Master 4 to bring next-level immersion and speed… thanks to tactile haptic feedback and instant access to favorite tools with the Actions Ring” ^[47] ^[48]. In short, it’s about efficiency and “delivering more in less time” for demanding users ^[49].

At $119.99 MSRP (or €129.99 in Europe) ^[50], the MX Master 4 does command a premium price. It’s roughly $20 more than the MX Master 3S’s launch price. Each purchase does include a 1-month Adobe Creative Cloud membership, hinting at the professional creative audience Logitech has in mind ^[51]. For many, the productivity gains and comfort will justify the cost. But it’s worth examining how it stacks up against both its predecessor and other mice – some of which cost less – to see if it’s truly the best choice for your needs.

Before jumping into competitors, it’s also worth noting a limitation: like previous MX Masters, the 4 is designed for right-handed use only. Logitech has never offered a left-handed MX Master. This continues to frustrate lefty users – the MX Master’s asymmetrical shape and side button placement simply don’t work in the left hand ^[52] ^[53]. (One crafty user even 3D-printed a mirrored MX Master 3S shell to create a DIY left-handed version ^[54]!) So, left-handed folks may need to look at ambidextrous alternatives – e.g. Apple’s Magic Mouse or certain Razer models – since the MX Master line isn’t accommodating that segment yet.

MX Master 4 vs Logitech MX Master 3S (Flagship vs Predecessor)

Should MX Master 3S owners upgrade? The MX Master 3S (released mid-2022) was until now Logitech’s top productivity mouse, and it remains a formidable device. In fact, as of early 2025 Rtings.com rated the MX Master 3S as the “best wireless mouse we’ve tested,” praising its comfort, quiet clicks, and versatile features ^[55] ^[56]. The 3S introduced the same 8000 DPI sensor and 90% quieter buttons that the MX Master 4 now carries forward ^[57]. It also has the dual scroll wheels, Flow support, and an identical physical shape/size to the 4. So, core tracking performance and ergonomics are very similar between the 3S and 4.

The MX Master 4’s advantages lie in its new additions: the haptics and Action Ring, plus the improved wireless chip and USB-C dongle. If those features excite you – for example, if you can envision using the radial shortcut menu to speed up tasks in Photoshop or Excel, or if you frequently switch between 3 computers – then the MX Master 4 offers a tangible productivity boost. The haptic feedback is also genuinely novel; feeling a soft vibration when a task completes or when snapping to a guideline can provide satisfying, almost subconscious feedback during work ^[58]. That said, some early reviewers note the haptics aren’t heavily leveraged by apps yet, so their usefulness may grow over time ^[59].

One downside of the MX Master 4 compared to 3S is weight: 150 g vs ~141 g. A ~9 g increase doesn’t sound like much on paper, but if you already felt the 3S was heavy (and some users did complain the 3S was “pretty heavy for a mouse” ^[60]), the 4 adds a bit more heft. As one user lamented upon hearing the specs, “what a shame. The weight [was] the biggest flaw of its predecessor… instead of improving it, they made it worse.” ^[61] ^[62]. For everyday work the weight isn’t a deal-breaker, but if you do quick wrist motions or suffer fatigue, lighter alternatives might appeal.

Price difference: With the MX Master 4 at $119, the older MX Master 3S has often been discounted – frequently available around $80–$99 now ^[63] ^[64]. If budget is a factor, the 3S at ~$40 cheaper is still one of the best mice on the market. It offers 90% of the MX Master 4’s functionality. In fact, many of the MX Master 4’s software features (except haptics) could trickle down to the 3S via Logitech’s Options+ app updates – though the 3S lacks the physical thumb button for an Action Ring, you could still assign some gestures or use keyboard shortcuts. The 3S also uses the Logi Bolt USB-A receiver (with improved wireless security over older Unifying receivers) ^[65]. The MX Master 4’s new USB-C dongle is Bolt-compatible and promises even stronger connectivity, but real-world difference may be minor for most users.

In summary, if you already own an MX Master 3S and it’s serving you well, you can confidently stick with it – it’s still a top-tier productivity mouse in 2025. Tom’s Hardware even noted the 3S “held the top spot on our best wireless mouse list” until now ^[66]. The MX Master 4 is an evolution, not a radical overhaul. However, if the new features align with your workflow or you’re just an enthusiast craving the latest and greatest, the Master 4 will feel like a refined upgrade (just expect a slightly heavier mouse). New buyers choosing between them will have to decide if the ~$20–$40 premium for the Master 4 is worth the haptics, Action Ring, and incremental polish. For most productivity-focused users aiming to “future-proof” their setup, the MX Master 4 represents Logitech’s pinnacle offering – but the 3S remains a close second, now potentially a value pick.

MX Master 4 vs Razer Pro Click V2 (Productivity Meets Gaming)

If Logitech’s main competition in the productivity mouse arena comes from anywhere, it’s from Razer’s Pro series. Razer, known for gaming peripherals, ventured into the office/productivity segment with the original Pro Click in 2020 and followed up with the Razer Pro Click V2 in 2025. This mouse is a direct challenger to the MX Master line – Windows Central calls it “clearly aimed directly at the legendary Logitech MX Master” ^[67]. The Pro Click V2 is essentially a hybrid mouse: it has the body and ergonomics of a productivity mouse but the internal specs of a high-end gaming mouse ^[68] ^[69].

Design & Comfort: The Pro Click V2 has a right-handed ergonomic design with a thumb rest, very much in the spirit of the MX Master. Reviews praise its “refined and comfortable ergonomic design” and excellent build quality ^[70]. It’s slightly large (even a tad larger than the MX Master, according to some), so small-handed users might find it a handful, but generally it’s built for long use comfort. One notable difference: Razer’s design, while comfortable, doesn’t include a second scroll wheel on the side. It has the standard top wheel which supports both notched and free-spin scrolling (and even left-right tilt clicks) ^[71], but no dedicated horizontal wheel. If you heavily use side scrolling or app-specific thumb wheel shortcuts on the MX Master, you’d miss that on the Razer. On the flip side, the Pro Click V2 does have one extra top button (behind the wheel) for cycling DPI or other functions, and two side buttons for thumb access (the MX Master has two side buttons as well, plus the wheel mode shift).

Performance: Here’s where Razer flexes its gaming pedigree. The Pro Click V2 sports Razer’s Focus Pro 30K optical sensor, giving it an astronomical DPI ceiling of 30,000 – far beyond the 8,000 DPI of Logitech ^[72]. In practice, no one needs 30K DPI for office work (or even most gaming), but it speaks to the accuracy and responsiveness of the sensor. More importantly, the Razer supports a 1000 Hz polling rate on its 2.4 GHz wireless dongle ^[73], meaning it can report its position to the computer up to 1000 times per second. The MX Master’s polling rate is not advertised, but typically Logitech’s non-gaming mice use 125 Hz or 250 Hz. The higher polling and gaming-grade sensor on the Razer make it extremely responsive – so much so that it doubles as a decent gaming mouse for casual play. Rtings.com found the Pro Click V2 has “extremely low click latency and an accurate, responsive sensor,” calling its performance “superb” for FPS gaming – the main drawback being it’s heavier than dedicated gaming mice ^[74] ^[75]. (At 106.7 g, the Razer V2 is lighter than the MX Master 4 by ~40 g, but still heavy compared to ultralight gaming mice ^[76] ^[77].)

For productivity tasks, both mice feel very fluid. Scrolling is a strong point on both: Logitech’s MagSpeed wheel is arguably the best in the business, but Razer’s wheel also toggles between modes and has smooth action plus tilt – most reviewers consider them equally excellent for long documents. Both can track on a variety of surfaces well. The difference in DPI beyond a certain point is academic, though if you use multiple 4K or 8K monitors, the Razer’s insane DPI might allow you to flick across screens faster (Logitech’s 8K DPI is already sufficient for 4K multi-monitor in most cases).

Wireless & Multi-Device: Razer allows pairing with up to 4 devices simultaneously (3 via Bluetooth + 1 via the USB receiver) ^[78], whereas Logitech supports 3. The Pro Click V2 can connect via Bluetooth, its USB-A 2.4 GHz dongle (Razer HyperSpeed), or even wired via USB-C cable (Logitech’s can be used wired only for charging, not as an active wired data connection). Both are compatible with major OSes; Razer Synapse software is Windows-only for full features (no Mac version for programming the extra buttons, which some Mac users have complained about ^[79]), whereas Logitech Options+ supports Windows and macOS fully.

Software & Shortcuts: Logitech’s Options+ software is generally considered more polished for productivity (with app profiles, Flow cross-computer control, etc.). Razer’s Synapse software, by contrast, is powerful but can be overkill and is required to be running for some features like the scroll tilt to work ^[80] ^[81]. This drew some criticism: “companion software needs to run in the background for some functions… somewhat resource-intensive” ^[82] ^[83]. On a positive note, Razer has also embraced the productivity trend of integrating AI shortcuts: the Pro Click V2 features a “Prompt Master” function that, with a long press of the scroll wheel, brings up quick access to AI assistants (similar to Logitech’s approach) ^[84]. It gives one-click triggers for things like ChatGPT or Microsoft Copilot directly, though one reviewer noted “It’s… fine. Some may find use in it, others will never” bother with it ^[85]. Still, it’s clear both Logitech and Razer see AI shortcuts as a selling point for 2025 and beyond.

Battery Life: The Pro Click V2 claims up to ~3.5 months on a charge (likely using Bluetooth) ^[86], which is slightly longer than Logitech’s ~2.5 months claim. Real-world, the difference may not be huge – Razer’s higher polling and RGB (if any) can drain more when using the dongle. Windows Central noted the battery “can easily go weeks without needing a charge” and that you “don’t have to worry much about battery life” on the Pro Click V2 ^[87] ^[88]. Both mice use rechargeable Li-ion batteries and top up via USB-C. One nice touch: you can use the Razer mouse while charging (it can act as a wired USB mouse), whereas the MX Master’s cable is only for charging, not data.

Price: The Razer Pro Click V2 undercuts Logitech slightly at $99.99 USD ^[89]. The Vertical Edition of the Pro Click V2 (a taller, handshake-style variant) costs $119.99 ^[90], matching the MX Master’s price. So value-wise, Razer is very competitive – you’re essentially getting flagship specs for ~$20 less than Logitech’s flagship.

Verdict: For someone torn between these two, it might come down to priorities:

Productivity-first user (non-gamer): The MX Master 4 offers a more refined office experience – the thumb wheel, better cross-platform software, and arguably more useful specialized features like Flow and the customizable Action Ring. Logitech’s device also has a long track record for durability in office settings.
Mixed-use or performance-focused user: The Razer Pro Click V2 brings best-in-class hardware performance. If you want a mouse for both work and the occasional game, its low latency and lighter weight are attractive. Windows Central concluded that true non-gamers “may still prefer the MX Master, but the Pro Click V2 puts up a great fight” and is “worthy of your attention” ^[91]. They lauded its ergonomic design and “excellent productivity and gaming performance” as a rare combo ^[92] ^[93].

In essence, the MX Master 4 vs Pro Click V2 is like Mercedes S-class vs Tesla – one is the established luxury comfort king with incremental tech, the other is a high-tech upstart that’s faster and a bit cheaper, yet almost as comfortable. It’s great for consumers that these two are duking it out; either way you’ll get a premium mouse. Some reviewers even dub the Pro Click V2 “the Logitech MX Master for gaming”, emphasizing that Razer succeeded in blending work and play ^[94] ^[95]. If possible, try both in hand – some prefer Logitech’s shape and scroll feel, others might like Razer’s lighter, slightly grippier form.

One more note: Razer’s quality control and support are factors to consider. Logitech has years of enterprise use (and an optional MX Master 4 for Business edition with IT-friendly firmware ^[96] ^[97]), whereas Razer historically aimed at consumers. Both are well-built; the Pro Click V2 uses premium materials and feels sturdy ^[98] ^[99]. Either mouse should last for many clicks – though heavy gaming on the MX Master could strain its buttons (as one user reported needing to RMA a 3S after FPS gaming broke the clicker) ^[100]. Razer’s devices are built for clicking thousands of times rapidly, so they may handle such abuse better. For pure office use, durability should be similar for both.

MX Master 4 vs Apple Magic Mouse (Two Different Worlds)

Apple’s Magic Mouse is often brought into these comparisons not because it’s similar – in fact it’s completely different in philosophy – but because many Mac users have to choose between Apple’s default mouse or a third-party like Logitech. The Magic Mouse 2 (the current version, now with a USB-C port as of late 2024) is a slim, touch-surface mouse that emphasizes style and macOS gesture integration.

Design & Ergonomics: The Magic Mouse is ultra-low profile – less than an inch tall – and is perfectly symmetrical. It looks like a sleek pebble with a smooth top surface. This design is visually striking and portable, but as Cult of Mac bluntly states, “it just isn’t comfortable” for many people’s hands ^[101]. Because it’s so flat, you cannot palm it; you end up pinching it or using a claw grip, which can cause finger cramping during extended use ^[102]. Your fingers often drag on the desk due to the low height ^[103]. There’s also no dedicated thumb rest or contour – a far cry from the voluptuous shape of the MX Master. Apple hasn’t offered different sizes or shapes; it’s one-size-fits-all, and for users with larger hands especially, it’s notoriously infamous. (It’s telling that even some die-hard Apple fans admit the Magic Mouse “fails to understand its users’ hands” ^[104] – a rare criticism of Apple’s design.)

However, the Magic Mouse does have its admirers. Some users with a light touch or those who value portability like it a lot ^[105]. It weighs around 99 g (very light) ^[106] and glides easily. And crucially, it’s ambidextrous, so left-handed use is no problem (the “buttons” are actually just the touch-sensitive surface registering left vs right click).

Gestures vs Buttons: The defining feature of Magic Mouse is its Multi-Touch surface ^[107]. The entire top is a touchpad, supporting gestures like two-finger swipe to go forward/back, one-finger scrolling in any direction, and even a double-tap for Mission Control or smart zoom, etc. Essentially, it merges some trackpad functionality into a mouse. No physical scroll wheel – you just swipe your finger to scroll, which many find smooth and intuitive (the glass surface has low friction) ^[108]. It’s a unique experience that “blends a mini trackpad onto a mouse” and Apple does it well – “if you can set all else aside, it’s a great experience,” notes Cult of Mac ^[109] ^[110]. For Mac users who love Apple’s trackpad gestures (swiping between full-screen apps, inertia scrolling, etc.), Magic Mouse offers that in a mouse form factor. In contrast, the MX Master has a traditional scroll wheel and multiple extra buttons. You can replicate some gestures on MX Master (Logitech lets you assign, say, holding a button and moving the mouse to trigger Mission Control, etc.), but it’s not as seamless as Apple’s native gestures.

Functionality & Limitations: The Magic Mouse connects via Bluetooth and can only pair to one device at a time (no easy multi-device switching) ^[111] ^[112]. It works best on macOS; while you can use it on Windows with drivers, the gestures won’t all carry over. It has a rechargeable battery lasting about a month per charge ^[113]. Unfortunately, Apple infamously put the charging port on the bottom of the mouse, meaning you cannot use it while charging (you have to flip it upside down and plug in, rendering it unusable until charged) ^[114] ^[115]. Apple defended this as acceptable since it only needs infrequent charging, but it’s widely mocked as a design snafu. As of 2024, Apple did switch the port to USB-C (from Lightning) in the latest units, but it’s still on the bottom, so the issue persists ^[116]. The MX Master of course charges via front USB-C and can even be used as a corded mouse if needed.

The Magic Mouse also lacks features like Force Touch or haptic click that Apple’s trackpads have – it’s a straightforward click mechanism (the whole shell depresses as a button). There’s no physical scroll toggle, no extra buttons, and no adjustable DPI (Apple doesn’t even publish DPI, but estimates put it around 1300 DPI; you adjust tracking speed in settings rather than true sensitivity). It’s a simple device at heart.

User Experience & Reviews: The Magic Mouse tends to be love-it or hate-it. For casual Mac users, it “gets the job done” and looks pretty doing it. For power users or anyone with ergonomics in mind, it’s often a pain (sometimes literally). DigitalCameraWorld summed it up: “On one hand, I really love the Magic Mouse… it looks amazing… On the other hand, [Apple is] putting style before comfort.” ^[117] That sentiment is common. The Magic Mouse’s biggest strength is the gesture interface: things like two-finger swipe between spaces or smooth inertial scrolling feel natural on it, more so than any third-party mouse on Mac. But its biggest weaknesses are comfort and limited physical controls.

When directly comparing to the MX Master 4, these two could not be more different:

Comfort: MX Master wins easily – it’s sculpted for the hand, whereas Magic Mouse is a flat glass slab. Long editing sessions or office days favor the Logitech (some Magic Mouse users eventually develop claw-grip strain).
Controls: MX Master has multiple buttons and two wheels; Magic Mouse has effectively one surface and relies on gestures. The MX Master’s extra buttons (e.g. thumb buttons for back/forward) can be a lifesaver for productivity. Magic Mouse makes you do gestures (like two-finger swipe for back) or use keyboard shortcuts – some love it, some find it inefficient.
Precision: The MX Master’s sensor (8000 DPI, works on any surface) is technically far superior. Magic Mouse’s laser sensor is fine on mousepads or desks but can struggle on glossy surfaces and lacks the resolution for multi-4K setups without lots of hand movement. If you require pixel-precise control (say in Photoshop), the MX Master’s configurable DPI and steadiness could help.
Mac integration: This is where Apple’s mouse shines for Mac users – it’s plug-and-play, supports all native macOS gestures and settings without extra software. The MX Master 4 is also Mac-compatible (Logitech makes a Mac-specific edition, which is essentially the same hardware but optimized for macOS and doesn’t include the USB receiver) ^[118]. Logitech’s Options+ software on Mac allows customizations and even supports many macOS gestures by mapping them to buttons. Still, some hardcore Mac aficionados prefer Apple’s own peripherals for the tight integration (e.g. smooth momentum scrolling tuned by Apple). It’s notable though that many Mac power users swear by Logitech MX mice to improve their workflow, despite Apple including a Magic Mouse with every iMac.

Upcoming Changes: Interestingly, rumors suggest Apple may finally address the Magic Mouse’s shortcomings. Renowned Apple analyst Mark Gurman reported that a Magic Mouse 3 is in development for 2026 or later, featuring a “more ergonomic and comfortable design” and a charging port relocated off the bottom ^[119] ^[120]. Perhaps Apple will incorporate a shallow thumb rest or a different shape inspired by popular mice like the MX Master 3S (which Gurman specifically cited as an ergonomic benchmark) ^[121]. For now though, we have the current Magic Mouse – unchanged in form since 2015 – versus Logitech’s state-of-the-art MX Master 4.

Who should choose which?

If you’re a Mac user who heavily uses gesture navigation and values the aesthetic/minimalist desk setup, the Magic Mouse might appeal. It’s extremely portable (slips in an iPad or laptop sleeve easily) and has that Apple design vibe. It’s also the only option that gives you the exact macOS trackpad gestures on a mouse. For light computing tasks, it’s adequate and keeps your workflow consistent.
For practically everyone else – especially those who prioritize comfort, programmability, or cross-platform use – the MX Master (or other alternatives) will likely boost your productivity far more. The difference in comfort is night and day. As one reviewer put it, “There is no other mouse similar in concept [to Magic Mouse] but more ergonomic… that’s why it’s disappointing [the Magic Mouse] isn’t a really great mouse” ^[122] ^[123] – implying many people really want Magic Mouse’s features in a better shape. Until Apple delivers that, Logitech is filling that void for Mac users who defect from the Magic Mouse. In fact, the MX Master 3S was recommended as the top alternative for Mac by many (it even comes in Mac-friendly colors and packaging). Now the MX Master 4 will likely take that crown, offering a massive ergonomics upgrade plus more functionality. And thanks to Logitech’s software, you can even replicate most Magic Mouse gestures on the MX (e.g., map horizontal scroll or thumb swipe to “swipe between spaces”).

In conclusion, MX Master 4 vs Magic Mouse isn’t a fair fight on specs – the Logitech is technologically superior and far more comfortable for heavy use. The Magic Mouse’s appeal lies in its unique touch interface and style. It’s almost worth considering alongside trackpads rather than against full-size mice. Many power users ultimately pair a MacBook’s trackpad or Magic Trackpad for gestures and use a Logitech MX Master for precision work – best of both worlds. If you have to pick one device though, ask yourself if you’ve ever been strained by a mouse or if you can live without the fancy gestures. If comfort and capability matter, the MX Master 4 wins handily. As Cult of Mac noted, Apple’s mouse is “failing to understand its users… specifically, their hands” ^[124] – whereas Logitech’s entire design is about understanding and supporting your hand for hours on end.

MX Master 4 vs Microsoft Surface Precision Mouse (Old Flagship, Still Relevant?)

Microsoft entered the premium mouse chat back in 2017 with the Surface Precision Mouse, aiming to complement their Surface line of computers. Now years old, it’s still on sale (often heavily discounted) and can be seen as a mid-range alternative to Logitech’s MX Master series. Let’s see how it stacks up and where it falls behind modern contenders.

Design & Comfort: The Surface Precision Mouse was widely praised for its ergonomics when it launched. Tom’s Guide called it “extremely comfortable… thanks to an ergonomic design, premium build, and a nifty thumb rest.” ^[125] It’s a medium-large right-handed mouse with a contour somewhat similar to an MX Master (though slightly smaller and a bit lower-profile). It has a smooth grey plastic exterior that matches the Surface aesthetic. At 135 g weight ^[126] ^[127], it’s a tad lighter than the MX Master 4, but still on the heavy side. Overall, in terms of holding it for long periods, the Surface Precision gets a thumbs up – many users find it pleasant for all-day use, second perhaps only to Logitech’s sculpted shape. It also has no left-handed version, like Logitech.

Features: This mouse includes three programmable side buttons near the thumb (one above the thumb rest, and two on the side) – giving you more buttons than a Magic Mouse or even the MX Master (which has two standard thumb buttons). These can be customized for various functions (only on Windows though – more on that shortly). The scroll wheel on the Surface Precision has an interesting trick: it offers both “detent or smooth scrolling,” meaning it can toggle between notched steps and free-spin ^[128]. However, the mechanism for that toggle is not as slick as Logitech’s – some reviewers noted the scroll mode switch is a bit noisy and not as refined ^[129] ^[130]. Still, it’s nice that Microsoft included a dual-mode scroll wheel at all.

The sensor is Microsoft’s BlueTrack technology with up to 3200 DPI max ^[131], which was decent at launch but now pales next to Logitech’s 8000 DPI or Razer’s 30K. For typical office use on a 1080p or 1440p screen, 3200 DPI is sufficient. But it might feel less snappy on high-resolution displays. BlueTrack is designed to work on many surfaces (though not on glass as well as Logitech’s Darkfield can).

Connectivity is versatile: it can connect via Bluetooth or USB cable (and you can use it while wired). Uniquely, Microsoft touted a “Smart Switch” feature: when paired with up to 3 PCs, you could move the cursor to the edge of one screen and it would jump to the next computer’s screen, similar to Logitech Flow ^[132]. This was essentially Microsoft’s version of cross-computer flow. However, this only works on Windows and requires the Mouse and Keyboard Center software.

Software & Compatibility: Here is where the Surface Precision struggled. Microsoft’s Mouse and Keyboard Center software (Windows-only) provided customization for the buttons and the Smart Switch multi-computer feature. On Mac, the mouse will function as a basic pointer but the special features (button customization, Smart Switch) do not work ^[133] ^[134]. Tom’s Guide warned “macOS users: beware” – the experience on Mac is crippled ^[135] ^[136]. Even on Windows, the software was considered underwhelming, with a clunky setup for multi-device use and limited options compared to Logitech’s suite ^[137] ^[138]. This is a key difference: Logitech Options+ has matured into a robust, user-friendly app on both Windows and Mac, whereas Microsoft’s utility felt like an afterthought. If you’re on Windows only, you can get the full Surface Precision feature set, but reports of lag and stutters have plagued this mouse. Tom’s Guide noted the mouse was “prone to lagging… happened thrice in my testing” ^[139]. This kind of lag (likely Bluetooth latency or interference) can be annoying and undermines the premium feel.

Battery: Microsoft claims up to 3 months (around 90 days) on a charge, similar to Logitech’s mice ^[140]. Users generally found the battery life solid (many went 6-8 weeks per charge in real use ^[141]). It charges via Micro-USB (older standard), which is a bit dated now in a USB-C world.

Price & Value: At launch, the Surface Precision was priced at $99 – directly matching the MX Master of the time ^[142]. However, given its age and frequent sales, it’s often available for much less (recently as low as $50–$60). This positions it as a mid-range bargain if you want a comfortable wireless mouse with multiple buttons. But considering the lag issues and lack of Mac support, you get what you pay for.

Comparing to MX Master 4: The MX Master 4 outclasses the Surface Precision in most technical aspects: far better sensor, more refined scrolling, more robust software, and likely better wireless reliability (especially with the new dongle). The Logitech also has more features (flow between any OS, haptics, etc.). Where the Surface Precision still holds its own is comfort – it is a very comfortable mouse, and if you’re on Windows it can do 80% of what an MX Master can. It even has a leg up with an extra side button and true tri-mode connectivity (USB, BT, wireless) whereas Logitech dropped wired mode long ago. If you for some reason dislike Logitech’s shape or need a cheaper alternative, the Surface Precision is an option to consider.

However, reviews landed lukewarm. Tom’s Guide’s verdict was that despite the great comfort, the performance issues and software gaps “don’t help justify its price tag.” ^[143] ^[144] They explicitly list lag, no lefty version, noisy scroll switching, and the high price as cons ^[145] ^[146]. Now that the price is lower, some of those cons are mitigated – but the fundamental lag problem might still exist for some.

In a nutshell, for Surface loyalists or multi-PC Windows users, the Surface Precision Mouse can be a decent budget-friendly productivity mouse if found on sale. But the MX Master (whether 3S or 4) is generally superior: nearly every review of the Surface Precision inevitably compares it to Logitech and finds Microsoft’s effort came up short. Unless you specifically want Microsoft’s styling or have had bad luck with Logitech, the MX Master 4 is a better investment for pro users. If your budget is sub-$70, you might consider the older MX Master 3S on sale or even Logitech’s mid-range models over the Surface Precision, unless you find a really good deal.

Other Notable Alternatives in the Productivity Mouse Market

Aside from the headliners above, there are other mice worth mentioning when surveying the productivity and performance mouse landscape in 2025:

Logitech MX Anywhere 3 (and 3S) – The MX Anywhere is essentially the MX Master’s little sibling: a compact travel-friendly mouse with high-end features (MagSpeed wheel, Flow, glass tracking). The Anywhere 3 (2020) and 3S (2023 refresh, adding quiet clicks) lack the ergonomic shape and thumb wheel of the Master, but they’re great for those needing portability. They cost around $79-$99. If you have smaller hands or need a mobile solution, the Anywhere series is popular. We might expect an “MX Anywhere 4” update in the future possibly adopting some of the Master 4’s improvements (no official word yet).
Vertical Ergonomic Mice: An increasing number of users are opting for vertical mice to alleviate wrist strain (holding the mouse in a handshake position). Logitech offers the MX Vertical and more recently the lower-cost Logitech Lift. These prioritize ergonomics over features, and they sacrifice things like fast scrolling, but can be more comfortable for some. Interestingly, Razer’s Pro Click V2 Vertical (mentioned earlier) marries a vertical form with high performance – at $120 it’s an alternative if you want MX Master-like internals in a vertical shape. Another entrant is Keychron’s M5 Vertical Mouse, a new 2025 release that boasts a 47° ergonomic design and a 30,000 DPI sensor with even an 8000 Hz polling option ^[147] ^[148]. Keychron is making waves by targeting the ergonomic market with enthusiast-grade specs, indicating how the field is expanding. For pure office productivity though, these verticals are still niche; most people adapt fine to a well-designed standard mouse like the MX Master.
Other Multi-Device Mice: There are mid-range offerings like Logitech’s M720 Triathlon (an older but reliable ~$50 mouse that can switch between 3 devices) and Microsoft’s own Bluetooth Ergonomic Mouse (a simpler, cheaper cousin of the Precision Mouse). These have basic features and longer battery life (often using AA batteries) but don’t match the precision or build of an MX Master. Still, if budget is tight, they serve everyday needs well.
Gaming/Enthusiast Mice for Work: Some users repurpose high-end gaming mice for productivity. For instance, Logitech’s G502 Lightspeed or MX518 Legendary (if you prefer wired) offer great ergonomics and performance, though they lack the multi-device and flow capabilities. With lightweight wireless gaming mice (like Logitech’s own G Pro series or Razer’s Basilisk and DeathAdder lines) becoming so good, if your work involves fast motions (CAD work, etc.), a gaming mouse could be an option. But you’d be trading off the extra productivity features and possibly comfort for speed.

In general, the premium productivity mouse segment is seeing convergence with gaming tech: the MX Master 4 got haptics (inspired by gaming controllers), Razer’s Pro Click got a top-tier sensor, and even Logitech’s newest gaming mice are getting adjustable buttons and feedback (see the Logitech G Pro X Superlight 2 and upcoming Superstrike which use some similar innovations) ^[149] ^[150]. This means future competitors might come from unexpected places – perhaps a gaming brand like Corsair or SteelSeries decides to make a productivity variant, or a newer company like Keychron continues to innovate.

Future Outlook: What’s Next for Productivity Mice?

Looking ahead, we have some insights and rumors on upcoming models and trends:

Logitech’s Roadmap: With the MX Master 4 just released, we shouldn’t expect an MX Master 5 for another couple of years (based on past 2–3 year cycles). However, Logitech could release an interim MX Master 4S if they choose to iterate (similar to how the 3S was a mid-cycle update). If they do, perhaps they might address the weight concern or further refine haptics. Also, keep an eye on Logitech’s other MX peripherals – a new MX Anywhere (travel mouse) or an updated MX Keys keyboard often accompany major releases. One thing many have asked for is a left-handed MX Master – but so far, Logitech hasn’t signaled any plans there, unfortunately. On the tech side, Logitech’s introduction of haptics in the MX Master 4 shows they’re exploring new ways to enhance user interaction. They might expand the Actions Ring concept, or integrate more smart features (like voice commands or deeper AI integration) in future software updates.
Firmware and Software Updates: A likely near-term “future” for MX Master 4 is in software. Logitech can update Options+ to add more Actions Ring plugins and haptic use-cases. For example, imagine haptic ticks while scrolling through long timelines, or custom vibrations for specific alerts in applications. If Logitech opens up an SDK, third-party developers could create new uses – this could keep the MX Master 4 evolving without new hardware. Also, any firmware updates could further optimize the wireless performance or fix minor issues that early adopters might report.
Razer & Competitors’ Next Moves: Razer just launched the Pro Click V2 this year, so a V3 is likely a couple of years off. But Razer might expand its Pro line – perhaps a smaller Pro Click Mini update, or more integrations with productivity software. Given Razer’s penchant for chroma lighting, maybe a future Pro Click could even have subtle RGB that ties to notifications (imagine your mouse glowing when you have new emails – just speculation!). Other gaming brands might be eyeing this space: we could see, for instance, SteelSeries or Asus ROG making an ergonomic multi-device mouse with high specs.
Apple Magic Mouse 3: As discussed, credible rumors point to Apple working on a Magic Mouse 3 with a new design. Mark Gurman (a reliable source) says to expect a relocated charging port and a “more ergonomic” shape, possibly taking cues from Logitech’s thumb-rest style ^[151]. It’s not expected until 2026 or later ^[152], so nothing immediate. But if/when Apple does this, it could be a big deal – it would be the first major redesign of Magic Mouse in well over a decade. If Apple makes it more hand-friendly while preserving the gesture magic, it could become a top contender for Mac users who currently jump ship to MX Masters. There’s also talk (from a Korean source) that Apple might experiment with adding Touch ID or voice control to future mice ^[153], or even integrating haptic feedback (Force Touch) into a Magic Mouse eventually. Those are less confirmed, but interesting to imagine.
Microsoft: Microsoft hasn’t announced a Surface Precision 2 yet. Given the first launched with the Surface Book 2 in 2017, a successor is overdue. If they do refresh it, we’d hope for USB-C charging, a better sensor and dongle, and improved software that possibly works on Mac too. There’s no strong rumor of it right now, but Microsoft occasionally surprises with new accessories at their Surface events. They did release a Microsoft Ocean Plastic Mouse (a simple portable mouse) and other ergonomic mice in recent years, but nothing on the high-end since the Precision. If they see Logitech and Razer pushing haptics and AI, maybe a Precision Mouse 2 could incorporate some of that.
Smaller Brands & Innovations: We’re also seeing startups and accessory makers innovate. The aforementioned Keychron M5 vertical mouse indicates newcomers integrating 8K Hz polling and 30K DPI in ergonomic designs ^[154] ^[155]. There are also more niche devices like trackball mice (Logitech’s MX Ergo hasn’t been updated since 2017, but an enthusiastic modding community still exists ^[156] ^[157]). Perhaps Logitech or others might revisit trackballs with modern sensors in the future. Another angle is software-side: Logitech Flow and Microsoft’s Smart Switch show a trend toward seamless multi-device workflows – we can expect further blurring of lines between devices (maybe using a mouse to control a tablet and PC at once, etc., as productivity ecosystems evolve).
Supply and Availability: One pragmatic note – with global supply chain fluctuations in recent years, there have been periods where popular mice were hard to find or faced price hikes. A Reddit user observed the MX Master 3S price jumping on Amazon unexpectedly ^[158], possibly due to demand or stock issues. The MX Master 4 being new might have short-term shortages or backorders if demand is high. Logitech’s production seems stable, but if you’re planning to purchase, it’s something to keep an eye on (especially around holiday seasons).

In conclusion, the productivity mouse market in 2025 is more exciting than ever. The Logitech MX Master 4 sets a new benchmark with its blend of hardware and software innovations. Competitors like Razer are raising their game, and even Apple appears poised to finally rethink its approach. For consumers, there’s a mouse to fit every preference: whether you prioritize ergonomic comfort, cutting-edge performance, multi-device convenience, or unique features, you have options.

The MX Master 4 currently stands at the pinnacle for most – it’s like the “executive sedan” of mice, packed with luxury and performance for the daily grind. But as we’ve seen, each competitor has its own appeal. The best choice ultimately depends on your workflow and ecosystem:

If you want the all-around champion for productivity, it’s hard to beat the MX Master 4’s combination of features and comfort.
If you desire a bit more gaming prowess or a lighter feel, Razer’s Pro Click V2 is right there nipping at Logitech’s heels ^[159].
If you’re deep in the Apple world and love gestures, you might hold out for Magic Mouse 3 – or augment your setup with a Magic Trackpad alongside a more ergonomic mouse.
And if you simply need a solid mouse without breaking the bank, the previous-gen models or Microsoft’s option can serve you well (just know you might be trading some performance or polish for the savings).

One thing is certain: our productivity tools are getting smarter. With AI integration, haptic feedback, and cross-device functionality, the humble computer mouse is evolving beyond just a point-and-click device into a true workflow companion. The Logitech MX Master 4 exemplifies this evolution, and its current competitors ensure that innovation will continue. As one expert review teased, the MX Master 4’s days as “our favorite productivity rodent” may be numbered if others catch up ^[160] – but for now, Logitech has raised the bar, and we’re eager to see how the competition responds in the coming months and years.

Comparison Table: MX Master 4 vs Key Competitors

Mouse	Price (USD)	Sensor & DPI	Battery Life (per charge)	Weight	Notable Features
Logitech MX Master 4	$119.99	Darkfield Laser, 8000 DPI	~70 days (10 weeks) ^[161]	150 g ^[162]	Haptic feedback, Actions Ring (radial menu), MagSpeed fast scroll + side scroll, 3-device wireless (USB-C dongle + BT) ^[163] ^[164].
Logitech MX Master 3S	$99.99 (orig.) (~$80-90 street)	Darkfield Laser, 8000 DPI	~70 days (10 weeks) ^[165] ^[166]	~141 g ^[167]	Quiet clicks (90% noise reduced) ^[168], MagSpeed scroll + side scroll, 3-device (Bolt USB-A dongle + BT), same shape as MX4 (no haptics or Action Ring).
Razer Pro Click V2	$99.99	Focus Pro Optical, 30,000 DPI ^[169]	Up to ~3.5 months (BT) ^[170] (several weeks typical)	106.7 g ^[171]	Gaming-grade 1000 Hz wireless, L/R tilt scroll wheel (free/spin modes), 4-device pairing (3 BT + 2.4GHz) ^[172], AI Prompt shortcut (ChatGPT/Copilot) ^[173], comfortable ergonomic shape ^[174].
Apple Magic Mouse 2	$79	Laser sensor, DPI n/a	~1 month+ ^[175]	~99 g ^[176] ^[177]	Multi-Touch gesture surface (360° scrolling, swipes) ^[178], ultra-low profile ambidextrous design, rechargeable (USB-C port, on bottom) ^[179], pairs with 1 device (Bluetooth only).
Microsoft Surface Precision	$99 (launch) (~$60 street)	BlueTrack Optical, 3200 DPI ^[180]	Up to 3 months ^[181]	135 g ^[182] ^[183]	Ergonomic shape with 3 thumb buttons, dual-mode scroll (notched/free) ^[184], 3-device wireless (Bluetooth or USB wired) ^[185], Smart Switch multi-PC control (Windows only) ^[186].

Sources: Key specifications and features were compiled from manufacturer data and expert reviews ^[187] ^[188] ^[189]. Pricing is current as of 2025; street prices may vary. Battery life assumes moderate use and may depend on connection type (BT vs receiver) ^[190] ^[191].