Nikon Z6 III Review: 6K Video, 120fps Bursts & Next-Level Autofocus

Key Facts

• 24.5MP Full-Frame Hybrid: The Nikon Z6 III is a third-generation full-frame mirrorless camera with a new 24.5 megapixel “partially stacked” CMOS sensor – the first of its kind in any full-frame camera ^{[1] [2]}. This unique sensor design stacks readout circuitry at the top and bottom of the imaging area, enabling much faster data throughput than the previous Z6 II’s sensor while keeping costs below Nikon’s flagship Z8/Z9 ^[3].
• Blazing Speed & Autofocus: Thanks to the fast sensor and EXPEED 7 processor (borrowed from the Z9/Z8), the Z6 III can shoot up to 20 fps RAW with full AF/AE tracking (or 14 fps with its mechanical shutter) and even up to 120 fps in a special JPEG mode (APS-C crop) ^[4]. Nikon claims the new autofocus system is 20% fasterthan the Z6 II, now offering advanced 3D Tracking and nine subject-detection modes (people, animals, vehicles, airplanes, etc.) ^{[5] [6]}. In real-world use, reviewers report the AF tracking is much improved and on par with Sony and Canon rivals, making the Z6 III “a much more capable action camera than its predecessor” ^{[7] [8]}.
• High-Resolution EVF & Fully Articulating Screen: A major upgrade is the 5.76-million-dot OLED viewfinderthat’s not only higher resolution but extraordinarily bright (peaking ~4,000 nits) for clear viewing even in sunshine ^[9]. Nikon also added a 3.2-inch fully articulated touchscreen (finally replacing the Z6 II’s tilting panel), greatly improving usability for video, vlogging, and shooting at odd angles ^{[10] [11]}. The Z6 III’s EVF is among the best in class for size and clarity, and the vari-angle LCD caters directly to content creators.
• Advanced 10-Bit Video (6K RAW): The Z6 III is a true hybrid, offering internal 12-bit RAW video (Nikon’s N-RAW or ProRes RAW HQ) up to 6K 60p, as well as oversampled 5.4K and UHD 4K 10-bit recording in H.265 or ProRes 422 codecs ^{[12] [13]}. In 4K UHD mode, it can record at 60p using the full sensor width (oversampled from 6K for maximum detail) with minimal rolling shutter, and even shoot 1080p at 240fps for 10× slow-motion ^[14]. Professional aids like waveforms, focus peaking, and zebras are built-in, and it’s the first Nikon to support line-level audio input and wireless timecode sync (Atomos AirGlu) for multicam video work ^{[15] [16]}.
• Best-In-Series Stabilization: Nikon improved the in-body image stabilization (IBIS) to 8.0 stops of shake reduction (CIPA rating, with a supported lens) – the strongest VR system in any Nikon Z camera ^[17]. A new “focus-point VR” feature optimizes stabilization around the active focus area to keep subjects tack sharp even near the frame edges ^[18]. This, combined with the Z6 III’s rugged weather-sealed build (magnesium alloy chassis, rated to −10 °C) ^[19], makes it a durable all-terrain camera for handheld shooting in challenging conditions.
• Launch & Price: Announced June 17, 2024, the Z6 III hit the market in late June 2024 at a $2,499 USD body-only MSRP (about £2,299 / €2,699). That’s a $500 jump over the Z6 II’s debut price, bringing it in line with competitors like the Sony a7 IV and Canon EOS R6 Mark II ^{[20] [21]}. Nikon also offers a kit with the Z 24–70mm f/4 S lens for ~$3,099. By mid-2025 the Z6 III has seen discounts (e.g. ~$500 off in a kit) and is widely available ^{[22] [23]}, signaling healthy supply.
• Trade-Off – Dynamic Range: The only notable compromise is that the Z6 III’s ultra-fast sensor produces slightly lower base ISO dynamic range than its predecessor. Lab tests found roughly a one-stop drop in shadow recovery headroom in RAW files ^{[24] [25]}. In practice, the “Raw files can’t be pushed quite as hard” in deep shadows compared to the Z6 II ^[26]. This matters mainly for extreme high dynamic range scenes (sunsets, astro/landscape) – for most shooters, the trade-off is negligible and outweighed by the vastly expanded capabilities ^{[27] [28]}.

General Overview and Positioning

The Nikon Z6 III sits in the sweet spot of Nikon’s full-frame Z series, positioned as a versatile enthusiast/prosumercamera that can handle just about anything. It succeeds the Z6 II (2020) and original Z6 (2018) as Nikon’s mid-range 24MP model, but elevates the line into a higher class. In fact, with its $2,500 price and beefed-up specs, the Z6 III directly competes with the likes of Sony’s a7 IV and Canon’s EOS R6 Mark II – all-rounder cameras for advanced users ^{[29] [30]}. Nikon intentionally timed the Z6 III’s release ahead of major events like the 2024 Olympics, aiming to give Nikon shooters a fast action-oriented body without the cost and bulk of a flagship ^{[31] [32]}.

In Nikon’s lineup, the Z6 III is positioned as the 24MP workhorse. It offers many flagship-level features trickled down from the Z9/Z8 (e.g. processor, AF algorithms, robust build), but in a more compact form and lower resolution than the high-megapixel Z7 series. Nikon markets the Z6 III as an ideal hybrid solution for enthusiast photographers and professionals who need a camera that can “do-it-all” – from fast sports and wildlife bursts to 10-bit video production, to portraits and events ^{[33] [34]}. Early hands-on impressions concur that Nikon has finally delivered a mid-tier mirrorless that leads its class, after earlier Z6 generations lagged slightly behind competitors in AF and video performance ^{[35] [36]}.

Notably, Nikon kept the Z6 III’s 24.5MP sensor resolution unchanged from the Z6 II, prioritizing speed and low-light performance over a megapixel race. This resolution hits a sweet spot: plenty for detailed prints, but manageable file sizes and excellent high-ISO quality. The camera’s target user is someone who needs speed, reliability, and versatility more than extreme resolution – think wedding shooters, multimedia journalists, travel and wildlife enthusiasts, and video creators who also shoot stills. For landscape specialists or anyone needing more MP, the higher-res (but slower) Z7 series or a future Z7 III might appeal. But for the broadest range of uses, the Z6 III is Nikon’s “all-rounder” champion, bridging the gap between entry-level full-frame (like the older Z5 or retro-styled Zf) and the flagship models ^{[37] [38]}.

Detailed Technical Specifications

Sensor & Processor: 24.5-megapixel full-frame (FX) CMOS sensor, partially-stacked, BSI design for fast readout ^[39]. Base ISO 100–51,200 (expandable to 50–204,800) with improved low-light AF sensitivity down to –10 EV (with an f/1.2 lens) ^[40]. Powered by Nikon’s EXPEED 7 engine (same as Z9/Z8) for high-speed processing.

Burst Shooting: Mechanical shutter up to 14 fps, electronic shutter up to 20 fps in 14-bit RAW (or 60 fps for JPEG only, 12-bit mode) ^{[41] [42]}. Pre-Release Capture mode can buffer ~1 second of images before you fully press the shutter, at 30fps, 60fps, or even 120fps (with some resolution/format limits) – a huge perk for catching critical moments in sports/wildlife ^{[43] [44]}. The electronic first curtain and fully electronic shutter options virtually eliminate shutter shock; flash sync is 1/250s (mech) or 1/60s (electronic) ^[45]. Notably, rolling shutter in e-shutter mode is greatly reduced (~14.6ms full-sensor readout) compared to the Z6 II (~50ms), making the Z6 III far more usable for fast action and quick pan shots ^[46].

Autofocus System: Advanced hybrid AF with 493 phase-detect points across ~90% of the frame (per earlier Nikon specs). New 3D Tracking AF mode (borrowed from Nikon DSLRs) lets you place a focus point, half-press, and have the camera track that subject anywhere in frame – a feature finally added to the Z6 series and working much more reliably than the old Wide-area tracking ^[47]. Subject detection now includes People (faces/eyes), Animals (dogs, cats, birds), Vehicles (cars, motorbikes, trains, bikes), and Airplanes, plus an Auto mode ^[48]. In reviews, the Z6 III’s AF is praised for its “good autofocus tracking with auto subject recognition” that is significantly less likely to lose the subject or grab the wrong target than the Z6 II was ^{[49] [50]}. Low-light AF is boosted by a new Starlight View mode for composition in near-darkness, and the -10 EV rating (with f/1.2) means it focuses even in scenes too dim for the human eye ^[51]. (Note: As of launch, the Z6 III lacked a dedicated “bird eye” mode found on the Z9, but a firmware update in 2025 added Bird detection to further improve wildlife AF ^{[52] [53]}.)

Image Stabilization: In-body 5-axis VR rated up to 8.0 stops of shake reduction (with a supported Z lens, e.g. 24-120mm f/4 at 120mm) ^[54]. This is a leap from ~5 stops in the Z6 II, putting the Z6 III at the forefront of IBIS performance. A novel Focus-point VR mode can concentrate stabilization on the active focus area to maximize sharpness on your subject, even at the frame edges ^[55]. For video, an electronic VR option adds extra stabilization (at a 1.25× modest crop) for walking handheld shots ^[56]. Combined with Nikon’s already effective optical lens VR, the camera produces very smooth video footage – Panasonic still leads slightly in IBIS for video smoothness, but Nikon isn’t far behind ^{[57] [58]}.

Viewfinder & Display: 0.5-inch OLED EVF, 5.76M-dot resolution, 0.8× magnification, 21mm eyepoint. Critically, it’s super bright (Nikon claims brightest in any mirrorless as of 2024) and covers the DCI-P3 color gamut for rich, true-to-life color in the finder ^{[59] [60]}. Blackout is minimal even during 20fps bursts, thanks to high refresh and the fast sensor output. Rear LCD is a 3.2-inch 2.1M-dot fully-articulating touchscreen – a first for the Z6 series, as previous models only had tilt screens ^[61]. The new vari-angle design flips out and rotates, useful for video blogging or selfies, while still supporting touch menus and playback. (Some still shooters prefer simple tilting for speed, but most appreciate the added flexibility for composing at any angle ^{[62] [63]}.)

Video Recording: A huge selling point of the Z6 III. It can record 4K Ultra HD up to 60p using the full sensor width with 6K oversampling for maximum detail (no APS-C crop needed at 60p) ^{[64] [65]}. Additionally, it offers 5.4K up to 60p in H.265 or ProRes 422 for slightly higher-than-4K resolution ^{[66] [67]}. For even higher quality or editing flexibility, 12-bit RAW video can be recorded internally: Nikon’s N-RAW (proprietary .nef video) up to 6K 60p, or ProRes RAW HQ up to 6K 30p (and 4K 60p) ^[68]. Full HD 1080p can go to 120p and 240p for slow-motion (240p is recorded in 10-bit H.265 for a 10× slow-mo effect) ^{[69] [70]}. There’s no recording time limit, thanks to an efficient heat dissipation design – Nikon quotes up to 125 minutes of 4K/60 footage in extended mode at 23 °C before any thermal shutoff ^{[71] [72]}. The Z6 III also supports HDR video (HLG) and Nikon’s flat N-Log profile for maximum dynamic range in post. Crucially, Nikon packed this camera with pro video assist tools: waveforms, zebras for exposure, focus peaking, and custom LUT support. It’s also the first Nikon with a full-size HDMI port (no flimsy micro HDMI) and the first to allow line-level audio input via the 3.5mm mic jack – meaning you can feed audio from a sound board or XLR adapter directly ^{[73] [74]}. Timecode sync via Bluetooth (Atomos AirGlu) is supported for multi-camera shoots ^[75]. All told, the Z6 III represents a massive video upgrade over the Z6 II, which lacked internal RAW and had more rolling shutter. It’s now “a significantly improved video camera”, offering higher quality output and even class-leading autofocus in video mode for reliable subject tracking ^{[76] [77]}.

Build & Handling: Constructed from magnesium alloy with composite front, the Z6 III’s body is slightly larger and heavier than the Z6 II (760 g vs 705 g) ^{[78] [79]}. The grip is a touch taller and deeper, which testers found more comfortable especially with longer lenses – there’s more room for your pinky and overall a very secure hand-hold ^{[80] [81]}. The control layout is nearly unchanged from previous Z6/Z7 bodies (which is good, as Nikon’s ergonomics were already well-regarded ^[82]). You get dual command dials, an AF joystick, twin Fn buttons by the mount, and extensive custom options. Weather sealing has been beefed up to flagship levels – Nikon says the Z6 III is as dust- and drip-resistant as the Z8, and cold-tolerant to -10 °C ^[83]. Roger Cicala’s teardown and others have noted meticulous gasket sealing, indicating it’s built to handle harsh environments on par with much pricier bodies ^{[84] [85]}. One minor quibble for longtime Nikon users: it still lacks the classic AF mode selector switch around the lens mount (present on some DSLRs and the Z8), meaning changing AF modes requires a button press + dial turn – a small ergonomic nitpick noted in reviews ^{[86] [87]}.

Storage & Battery: Dual card slots: 1× CFexpress Type B / XQD and 1× SD UHS-II ^[88]. The CFexpress slot is recommended for 6K RAW video and 120fps bursts (due to the throughput needed), while the SD slot offers wide compatibility. You can configure backup recording or RAW+JPEG split between cards. The camera uses the familiar EN-EL15c battery (20.4 Wh); CIPA-rated for ~390 shots (LCD) or ~360 (EVF) per charge ^[89]. In practice, users report “reasonable battery life” for a day of moderate shooting ^[90] – roughly on par with rivals, though Sony’s a7 IV can eke out more shots on its larger battery ^[91]. The Z6 III supports USB-C charging and power delivery, so one can run the camera via a power bank or AC adapter for extended shoots ^[92]. (Do note: Nikon no longer includes an external charger in the box – a cost-saving decision flagged by some as a downside ^[93].) For those needing more endurance and a vertical grip, the optional MB-N14 battery grip holds 2 batteries (EN-EL15 series) and provides portrait controls. It can hot-swap batteries (so you can replace one while running on the other) and is similarly weather-sealed ^{[94] [95]}, effectively doubling stamina to ~1.9× the shots/footage ^[96].

Connectivity & Apps: The Z6 III features built-in Wi-Fi (dual-band 2.4/5 GHz) and Bluetooth LE, enabling wireless image transfer and remote control via Nikon’s SnapBridge app. SnapBridge allows auto-download of 2MP previews or manual transfer of full files, as well as remote live view shooting from a smartphone. New to the Z6 III is integration with the upcoming Nikon Imaging Cloud service: the camera can automatically upload shots to Nikon’s cloud when connected to Wi-Fi, and even update its firmware over Wi-Fi with no PC needed ^{[97] [98]}. You can also download “Imaging Recipes” (creative shooting presets and Picture Controls by Nikon and pro creators) from the cloud straight into the camera ^{[99] [100]}. In terms of ports, along with the full HDMI and mic input mentioned, you get a headphone jack for audio monitoring, USB-C (USB 3.2 Gen1) for data and streaming, and a 10-pin remote terminal. After a 2025 firmware update, the Z6 III even supports UVC/UAC plug-and-play webcam streaming via USB, so it can act as a high-end webcam without extra software ^[101]. Overall, Nikon has modernized the connectivity – one reviewer noted the SnapBridge connection is “simple [and] reliable” now ^[102], a far cry from the clunky early days of the app.

Key Improvements Over the Nikon Z6 II

The Z6 III brings a host of upgrades and refinements over the previous Z6 II, addressing its weaknesses and adding new capabilities:

• ❯ Sensor and Speed: The move to a partially-stacked sensor is the foundation of the upgrade. The Z6 II’s 24.5MP BSI sensor was fast for its time (12 fps), but the Z6 III’s new chip (with extra readout circuits) is on another level – enabling nearly double the burst speed and dramatically cutting rolling shutter ^{[103] [104]}. As DPReview succinctly put it, “the Z6III’s sensor and top-end processing turn it into a genuine do-anything camera”, whereas previous Z6 models struggled to keep up with peers in AF and burst performance ^[105]. The Z6 III’s electronic shutter can shoot 20 fps RAW with tracking (versus 10–14 fps on the Z6 II, which also had more viewfinder blackout). It also introduces the 30/60/120 fps pre-capture burst which the Z6 II lacked ^[106]. Bottom line: Action shooters will immediately feel the difference – the Z6 III can capture moments “that would have been next to impossible” on the Z6 II ^[107].
• ❯ Autofocus: Perhaps the most appreciated improvement. The Z6 II’s AF, while decent (it added eye-detect and animal AF via firmware), was “notably inconsistent” in subject tracking and often lost focus on fast subjects ^[108]. The Z6 III inherits the flagship AF algorithms and adds 3D Tracking, producing a quantum leap in reliability. Nikon also expanded subject recognition from the Z6 II’s limited set to now include vehicles and airplanes, etc. ^[109]. In low light, the Z6 III focuses down to -10 EV without needing a special mode (Z6 II was rated around -4.5 EV). One early adopter wrote that upgrading from Z6 II to III, “the difference in AF performance is like night and day.” ^[110] The Z6 III locks onto eyes and moving subjects with much more tenacity; it finally “matches Canon and Sony in autofocus tracking”, according to DPReview’s tests ^[111].
• ❯ EVF and LCD: The Z6 II’s 3.69M-dot EVF was starting to feel dated, and its static 60Hz refresh could appear choppy during bursts. The Z6 III’s 5.76M-dot EVF not only offers a sharper view but also a faster refresh and vastly higher brightness ^[112]. No more tunnel vision or lag – it’s a big ergonomic win, especially for fast shooting where the Z6 III shows minimal blackout at 20 fps ^{[113] [114]}. Likewise, the switch from a tilting screen to a fully-articulating screen is a major quality-of-life improvement for video shooters and creatives who need to compose from in front of the camera or at extreme angles ^[115]. The Z6 II’s tilt-only screen was limiting for self-recording and vertical shooting; the Z6 III’s vari-angle solves that (albeit with a minor annoyance that cables plugged into the side can obstruct the flip-out screen slightly ^[116]).
• ❯ Image Stabilization: Both cameras have 5-axis IBIS, but the Z6 III pushes it to 8 stops with newer gyros/algorithms ^[117]. In practice you gain a few stops of hand-holdability, and the new Focus-point VR helps edge compositions that the Z6 II couldn’t stabilize optimally. This is especially helpful for hand-held telephoto or macro work where the older model might struggle.
• ❯ Video Capabilities: This is arguably the most dramatic generational leap. The Z6 II topped out at 4K 60p (and that 60p was with a 1.5× APS-C crop, line-skipped) and could only output RAW video via HDMI to an external recorder (no internal log in 10-bit without an upgrade fee). The Z6 III has no crop 4K/60p oversampled, and it records 10-bit and RAW internally to the card ^[118]. It’s one of the first in its class to allow internal N-RAW and ProRes RAW capture – with the Z6 II you’d need an external Atomos recorder for RAW. The Z6 III also adds 5.4K and 6K resolutions, 1080/120–240p slow-mo, advanced waveform monitors and a dedicated video menu – none of which the Z6 II offered. The difference is night and day for videographers; PetaPixel flatly stated “the camera has excellent video characteristics, proving itself to be a powerful hybrid tool” ^{[119] [120]}. Additionally, the Z6 III’s video AF is vastly better – the Z6 II could hunt or lose subjects in video, whereas the new model’s subject tracking in video mode is “fairly dependable” even for fast-moving targets ^[121].
• ❯ Other Notables: The Z6 III adds a 96MP pixel-shift multi-shot mode (combining 4 or 8 shots via Nikon software for extra resolution) which the Z6 II lacks ^[122]. It introduces Hi-Res Zoom (lossless digital zoom in 4K video, handy for primes) ^[123]. Shutter durability remains high (the Z6 II already had ~200k actuations rating; the Z6 III’s is similar but with less reliance on mechanical shutter if you prefer silent shooting). The new model also has the Nikon Imaging Cloud connectivity and in-camera firmware updates via Wi-Fi, which were absent on the older model ^{[124] [125]}. On the flip side, one downgrade is the increased base ISO noise – the Z6 III’s raw files have a bit less dynamic range at ISO 100 due to the faster sensor design ^{[126] [127]}. If you absolutely need maximum shadow recovery for landscape, the older Z6 II (or a Z7 II) might retain a slight edge there. But for most users and scenarios, the Z6 III is superior in essentially every way – “a better camera in every important regard” as DPReview concluded ^[128].

Hands-On Impressions and Expert Reviews

The Nikon Z6 III has been met with overwhelmingly positive reviews from experts, many hailing it as Nikon’s comeback in the mid-range mirrorless segment. DPReview awarded it a Gold Award with an impressive 91% score, stating: “It’s faster at shooting, has much improved autofocus and captures much more impressive, flexible video… a do-everything camera that does a lot of things very well.” ^[129] Notably, DPReview remarked that with the Z6 III, Nikon finally has a class leader in this category, after a couple of generations of playing catch-up ^{[130] [131]}. They found the camera’s blend of speed, ergonomics and features so strong that “it starts to look like the model others need to catch up to.” ^[132]

PetaPixel’s review (by photographer Chris Niccolls) also praised the Z6 III as perhaps the best all-around full-frame hybrid on the market. In the conclusion, PetaPixel gives a strong buy recommendation: “Yes. The Z6 III is the best all-around full-frame hybrid camera in this price range. I just wish it gave competitive dynamic range when using the mechanical shutter.” ^[133]. That last caveat refers to the slight dynamic range loss at base ISO – Niccolls described it as the Z6 III’s “dirty secret” in an otherwise stellar performer ^{[134] [135]}. His tests confirmed roughly a one-stop drop in shadow latitude compared to the older sensor, but he emphasized that for the vast majority of real-world shooting, the Z6 III’s files looked fantastic ^{[136] [137]}. The trade-off only really affects those pushing shadows from low ISO shots (e.g. high-contrast landscapes); above ISO 800 the dynamic range difference levels out ^[138]. Despite that quibble, PetaPixel’s reviewer was impressed with the camera’s “beautiful design”, customization, and especially the new sensor’s speed – enabling 20 fps RAW bursts “without too much rolling shutter” and making the Z6 III feel like a mini Z8 ^{[139] [140]}.

TechRadar likewise gave the Z6 III a glowing review, anointing it “an exquisite all-rounder that’s close to perfection”. Their verdict applauded Nikon for delivering a camera that “takes the crown as the current best full-frame all-rounder you can buy” ^[141]. The reviewer noted that action shooters will love the new AF and burst capabilities: “if you like to shoot anything that moves – the new autofocusing and fast frame rate courtesy of that partially stacked sensor is really quite special.” ^[142] They also highlighted the camera’s fantastic handling and class-leading EVF, saying it’s a pleasure to use for extended periods ^[143]. TechRadar’s only real cons were the lack of a resolution bump (still 24MP) and the price hike, plus Nikon’s omission of a standalone charger in the box ^[144]. But in terms of performance, they found little to fault – image quality is “fantastic” (even if not dramatically different from the Z6 II per pixel) and you can now get shots that were previously impossible with the older model ^[145]. In sum, TechRadar felt Nikon has delivered “a solid and reliable performer” that excels for both stills and video, and is well worth the investment for serious enthusiasts ^{[146] [147]}.

In more anecdotal hands-on accounts, The Verge’s Becca Farsace tried the Z6 III on a photo walk and was particularly taken by its responsiveness. She wrote that Nikon’s recent cameras (Z8, Z9, Z6 III) are “so responsive and intuitive that you no longer have to spend as much time thinking about problems such as focus, handshake, or shutter speed. You can quickly point the camera in any direction and it will capture something in focus.” ^[148] Her test involved tracking seagulls in flight against busy backgrounds, and the Z6 III had “absolutely no trouble locking onto birds”, even without a dedicated bird AF mode ^[149]. Within minutes she rattled off over 100 sharp bird photos, which underscores the significant autofocus leap Nikon achieved. The Verge also praised the bright EVF and robust build, noting the camera feels ready for adverse conditions and that Nikon “builds very resilient cameras that don’t skimp on specs” ^[150].

Overall, the consensus among reviewers is that the Z6 III is a huge step forward. Its combination of high-speed shooting, greatly improved AF, top-notch viewfinder, and pro-grade video features makes it one of the most versatile cameras at this price. As DPReview concluded: “with the breadth of its capabilities… it’s also the most all-round capable camera in its class… a do-everything camera that will rise to almost any challenge”, easily the best Z6-series model yet ^{[151] [152]}.

Autofocus and Image Stabilization Performance

One of the headline upgrades in the Z6 III is its autofocus system. In real-world testing, the camera’s AF performance is fast, sticky, and vastly more reliable than the Z6 II. The inclusion of Nikon’s 3D Tracking mode is a game-changer – testers found they could simply position the AF box over a subject and half-press, and the Z6 III would tenaciously follow that subject across the frame, even against distracting backgrounds ^{[153] [154]}. This DSLR-style tracking was something the Z6 II struggled with (it had a rudimentary tracking mode that often lost the target or required recentring) ^[155]. Now, the Z6 III’s tracking is on par with modern Canon and Sony systems, to the point that “the camera will capture something in focus” even during erratic movement, as The Verge noted from a brief hands-on ^[156].

Subject detection improvements also elevate the experience. The Z6 III’s Auto Area AF with subject detect can intelligently pick out eyes/faces or animals in the scene. DPReview found the Auto subject recognition modeparticularly useful: it locked onto a cyclist’s eye even when the subject wore a cap and glasses, and the AF point didn’t need to hunt around ^[157]. In their standard AF-C tracking torture test, the Z6 III performed very well – it held focus on a fast-moving cyclist through most of a burst sequence, only dropping a few frames slightly out of focus when the subject’s speed abruptly changed ^{[158] [159]}. They did note that while excellent, the Z6 III’s autofocus “doesn’t feel like it’s up to the standard set by the Z8 and Z9” ^[160] – Nikon’s flagship bodies still have an edge in absolute AF confidence and perhaps more sophisticated subject tracking algorithms. But for its class (mid-range full-frame), the Z6 III is now among the top performers in AF, roughly matching the Canon R6 II and Sony a7 IV in focus acquisition and tracking for most situations ^[161]. Only Panasonic’s system falls behind (despite adding phase-detect in the S5II, it’s still a bit slower) ^{[162] [163]}.

In low-light and low-contrast scenarios, the Z6 III also shines. The upgraded sensor readout and processing allow focusing in conditions down to -10 EV (with a fast lens), which is extremely dark – essentially lit by faint moonlight. The camera also doesn’t require engaging a special “Starlight AF” mode like the Z6 II did for very dark scenes; it natively focuses in near-darkness, albeit more slowly. Photographers have reported that in dim receptions or night street scenes, the Z6 III locks focus where the Z6 II might have hunted. The improved eye detection is another plus – it picks up human eyes from farther away and sticks to them as your subject moves. Animal eye-AF now specifically recognizes birds in flight (particularly after the firmware 2.0 update adding a bird mode) ^[164], a welcome addition for wildlife shooters who lamented its omission at launch.

When it comes to image stabilization, the Z6 III’s 5-axis IBIS has been lauded as one of Nikon’s best implementations yet. That 8-stop CIPA rating is partly theoretical (achieved under ideal conditions with a certain lens), but practically it means you can handhold shots at shutter speeds you’d never attempt before. Photographers report reliably getting sharp shots down to ~1/4 second with a 24mm lens, or ~1/15 second at 70mm, which is remarkable. One new feature, focus-point VR, tailors the stabilization to the selected focus point. This is useful for compositions where your subject isn’t centered – for example, if you focus on something at the far edge of the frame, the camera knows to prioritize correcting motion that would blur that area ^{[165] [166]}. This helps counter one issue with standard IBIS: its algorithms usually optimize for center-frame sharpness, which can leave edges less stabilized. Nikon’s solution mitigates that, and early feedback indicates it works well for wide-angle shots where a subject is near the corner.

For video stabilization, the Z6 III’s in-body VR plus optional electronic VR yields very smooth footage. DPReview noted that while the spec numbers (8.0EV vs 5.5EV etc.) don’t tell the whole story, the Nikon produces stable handheld video, though Panasonic’s system still has an edge in extreme cases (the S5II’s combination of IBIS + electronic “Boost I.S.” is slightly steadier when walking) ^[167]. The Z6 III does benefit from lens VR in many Nikon Z lenses (which works in sync with the body IBIS). Overall, users filming with the Z6 III can achieve gimbal-like steadiness for static or slow-moving shots, and moderate motion shots are quite smooth, especially with the electronic VR engaged (at the cost of a minor crop). The important part is that the stabilization no longer feels like a weakness at all – indeed Nikon claims it’s the most effective in any mirrorless as of mid-2024 ^[168], and there’s little real-world evidence to the contrary.

In summary, autofocus and stabilization are standout strengths of the Z6 III. The camera achieves that rare feat of making itself nearly invisible in use – you can trust it to get focus and counteract handshake in most situations, freeing you to concentrate on composition and timing. As one TechRadar editor put it, the Z6 III’s “excellent autofocus” and fast shooting give it an edge, and its IBIS provides “the most stable of bases to shoot from” for both stills and video ^{[169] [170]}.

Video Capabilities and Quality

The Nikon Z6 III is arguably one of the best video-capable hybrid cameras in its class, thanks to the comprehensive feature set Nikon has packed in. Building on the Z6 line’s strong video legacy (the original Z6 was Nikon’s first camera to get RAW video output), the Z6 III goes much further by enabling internal 10-bit and RAW recording. This means you no longer need an external recorder to get the highest quality footage – a huge convenience for solo shooters and creators on the go.

Resolutions & Frame Rates: The headline spec is 6K video. The Z6 III can capture 6K up to 60 frames per second in N-RAW format ^{[171] [172]}. This 6K is a 5952×3348 resolution readout of the full sensor (16:9 aspect), providing extra flexibility for editing (you can downsample to 4K or crop/pan in post while retaining 4K quality). It also offers 6K at 30p in ProRes RAW HQ if you prefer Apple’s RAW codec ^[173]. While 6K may seem like overkill, it future-proofs your footage and, as Nikon notes, allows techniques like digital reframing, stabilizing or zooming in post without losing 4K UHD output quality ^{[174] [175]}.

For standard 4K UHD (3840×2160), the Z6 III can do 4K at 24/25/30/50/60p all from the full sensor width. There is no crop at 60p, unlike some competitors that reduce the field of view or pixel bin (Sony a7 IV applies a 1.5× crop for 4K60). In fact, the Nikon oversamples its 4K from 6K data for superb detail and low noise at up to 60p ^[176]. The result is crisp, downsampled 4K with an apparent resolution advantage over cameras that line-skip or crop for 60p.

Additionally, Nikon included an unusual 5.4K mode (at 30p and 60p, in H.265 or ProRes 422) ^{[177] [178]}. This is a ~1.2× crop mode using a 5.4K region of the sensor, likely intended to match a DCI cinema 4K aspect or to reduce rolling shutter further. It could be useful if you want a slightly tighter field of view or smaller file sizes than 6K N-RAW, but more resolution than 4K.

Where the Z6 III clearly outclasses its predecessor is in high frame-rate and slow-motion options. It enables 1080p at 120p and 240p (the latter in 10-bit H.265) for slow-motion playback ^{[179] [180]}. The Z6 II, by contrast, topped out at 1080/120p. The 240p Full HD is great for creative 10× slow-mo effects, though with some quality trade-off (it skips lines or reduces fidelity). For most slow-motion needs, 1080/120 (for 5× slow-mo) strikes a good balance of quality and frame rate on the Z6 III.

Recording Formats & Bitrates: The Z6 III supports a variety of codec options:

• N-RAW (.NEV): Nikon’s compressed RAW video (12-bit). This records either 6K60 or 4K60 internally to CFexpress cards. N-RAW packs RAW data at roughly 2:1 to 3:1 compression and requires Nikon’s software or DaVinci Resolve with a plugin to grade. It’s very flexible for color grading and exposure adjustments.
• ProRes RAW HQ: 12-bit RAW in Apple’s codec, up to 6K30/4K60 internally ^[181]. Some may prefer this for compatibility with Final Cut Pro or certain workflows. One caveat mentioned in reviews: using ProRes RAW currently disables in-camera lens corrections, which can make wide-angle footage exhibit distortion/vignetting that’s tricky to fix in post ^[182].
• ProRes 422 HQ: 10-bit 4:2:2 at up to 5.4K60/4K60. Good for those who want edit-friendly intraframe files straight out of camera.
• H.265 (HEVC): 10-bit 4:2:2 Long GOP, up to 5.4K60/4K60. Offers a great balance of quality and file size, though it’s processor-intensive to edit.
• H.264: 8-bit (and possibly 10-bit in SDR modes) up to 4K30, mostly for backward compatibility or longer recording times if needed ^[183].

Nikon also introduced a new “MP4 [H.265] 8-bit Lite” mode (noted in some menus) which creates smaller files for quick sharing, though serious users will stick to the higher quality modes.

Assist Tools & Features: Aiming squarely at videographers, Nikon gave the Z6 III a suite of exposure and focus aids. The inclusion of a waveform monitor is particularly noteworthy – it allows precise exposure judging (far better than simple zebras alone) and is something typically found on cinema cameras or the Panasonic GH/G series, not on stills-oriented hybrids. Focus peaking and zebras are standard now, and the Z6 III has those as well (with customizable zebra thresholds). There’s a red REC border option to clearly show when you’re recording. The camera also offers fine ISO control in manual video mode (adjustable in 1/6 or 1/3 stops), and shutter angle display if not actual shutter angle setting (shutter angle was requested by some users but as of now the camera uses shutter speed values).

Audio is also well-handled: the Z6 III has the usual mic and headphone jacks, but it being the first Nikon with line-level input means you can feed it from a sound mixer or hotshoe XLR adapter (like Tascam’s or the Nikon TE-1 adapter) without overload, improving audio quality for pro shoots ^[184]. The preamps are clean and you can adjust levels in finer increments than before.

Quality and Rolling Shutter: Thanks to the fast sensor, the Z6 III exhibits minimal rolling shutter in video. DPReview measured around ~14ms full-sensor readout, which is much better than the Sony a7 IV (~30+ ms in 4K) and even a tad better than the Canon R6 II (~15ms) ^[185]. This means quick pans or moving subjects won’t have severe “jello” distortion; it’s very solid for an electronic shutter readout. The oversampled 4K footage is extremely detailed, rivaling what you’d get from higher resolution sensors downsampled – Nikon’s sharpening and detail retention in N-Log or RAW is excellent, with no heavy aliasing. Colors out of the box (using Nikon’s Neutral or Standard profiles or the flat N-Log which grades nicely) are pleasing, as Nikon is known for good color science.

One thing reviewers noted is that in low-light video, if you try to boost shadows in N-Log or RAW, you might see a subtle “pulsing noise” pattern in the deepest shadows ^{[186] [187]}. This is likely due to the sensor’s higher read noise at base ISO and how the camera’s noise reduction interacts with it. It’s only apparent if you’re really pushing an underexposed Log clip. For properly exposed video, noise performance is very good – clean up to ISO 3200 or 6400, and usable beyond for many situations (especially if downsampled to 1080p or with noise reduction in post).

Thermals: Nikon clearly worked on heat dissipation (possibly learned from the Z8 launch). The Z6 III does not have a fan (unlike Panasonic’s S5IIX), but it manages a claimed 125 minutes of 4K60 recording in extended mode ^[188]. Reviews found no overheating in typical use – one can record long clips in 4K30 or 4K60 without issue, as long as the environment isn’t extremely hot. If you push the camera in 6K RAW for prolonged periods, it might get warm, but so far no widespread reports of overheating have surfaced, which is great news (Canon’s original R6 had infamous time limits; the R6 II improved it, and Nikon seems to have it well under control too).

In summary, the Z6 III’s video capabilities are top-notch for a hybrid. It provides extreme flexibility – you can shoot casual quick clips in standard profiles, cinematic footage in Log or RAW, vertical video for social media (it has built-in tools for that too), and slow-motion B-roll, all in one device. It’s telling that DPReview stated the Z6 III and Canon R6 II stand above the Sony a7 IV in video, offering “faster video capture with less rolling shutter” and more robust AF for video ^[189]. Nikon even took care of small details like moving the headphone jack position so it doesn’t block the LCD when flipped out ^[190], showing they considered real-world video usage. For anyone who is a hybrid shooter (50/50 photos and video, or even 70/30 in either direction), the Z6 III is a dream tool in how seamlessly it handles both disciplines.

Build Quality, Handling, and Ergonomics

Nikon has a strong reputation for solid camera construction, and the Z6 III fully lives up to that. The body feels robust and dense, with a build quality essentially on par with the higher-end Z8 ^[191]. The chassis uses magnesium alloy in the front and top, with reinforced polycarbonate in some areas, striking a good balance of strength and weight. All seams, buttons, and dials have extensive weather sealing – tests and teardowns indicate that Nikon went to great lengths to gasket every entry point to achieve pro-grade weather resistance ^[192]. While Nikon doesn’t publish an official “weatherproof” rating, they confidently state it’s ready for harsh conditions, and reviewers have used it in rain and dusty environments without issue. The camera is also certified to operate in freezing temperatures down to -10 °C (14 °F), which is important for winter shooters or high-altitude work ^[193].

Handling: The Z6 III’s slight increase in size has ergonomic benefits. The grip is a bit taller and deeper, which most users find more comfortable, especially if you have medium or large hands ^[194]. Your pinky finger no longer dangles off the bottom as it might on the Z6 II or a Sony a7 series – Nikon extended the grip just enough to accommodate a full hand. The rubberized texture is secure, and the camera’s weight (760g with battery) gives it a reassuring heft without being too heavy. It’s lighter than a Nikon D780 or D850 DSLR, for context, but heavier than a Sony a7 IV or Canon R6 II by about 100g ^{[195] [196]}. That extra weight contributes to the solid feel and likely better heat dissipation.

Button and dial placement on the Z6 III will be immediately familiar to Nikon users. Nikon smartly kept the control scheme consistent: twin command dials at front and back, the mode dial on the top left (with a lock button), an AF-ON button and joystick on the back for focus point control, and two customizable Fn buttons by the lens mount for quick settings. Longtime Nikon shooters will only miss, as mentioned, the old AF/MF switch with center button that DSLRs had – but that’s a quirk of all Nikon Z bodies except the Z8/Z9. Otherwise, everything falls to hand nicely, and “well-honed ergonomics” was one of the pros in DPReview’s conclusion ^[197]. The menu system remains the same logical, tabbed interface, and you can use touch or joystick to navigate. The “i” quick menu is fully customizable with your preferred settings.

A noteworthy change is the swap to a fully articulating screen. For shooting stills, some photographers prefer a simple tilt screen for its quick one-handed adjustment. An articulating screen, which flips out to the side, can be a bit slower to deploy and is more conspicuous (as TechRadar’s reviewer mentioned, it’s “less discreet” for street shooting) ^{[198] [199]}. However, the benefits are clear: you can face it forward for vlogging or selfies, and you can compose in portrait orientation at low or high angles – something a tilt screen can’t do. The hinge mechanism feels sturdy, and Nikon placed it so that, while an HDMI or mic cable can slightly interfere when the screen is rotated, it’s manageable ^[200]. Overall, it’s a welcome improvement for most users, especially anyone doing video or creative angles.

The viewfinder experience is excellent. Beyond the resolution and brightness, the eyecup and optics give a large, comfortable view. There is virtually no lag when panning or shooting bursts – Nikon even reduced the EVF blackout at 20 fps such that you get a near-live view (not quite as perfect as the blackout-free Z9, but very good) ^{[201] [202]}. The camera also powers on and wakes very quickly (Nikon quoted ~0.4s startup). One small firmware tweak in 2.0 addressed a user gripe: now if you flip out the LCD, the eye sensor can be auto-disabled so the EVF doesn’t accidentally turn on – this makes using the vari-angle screen easier, as earlier the EVF eye sensor could cause the screen to turn off if something got close to it ^[203].

In terms of shooting experience, the Z6 III feels very responsive. The shutter mechanism (for mechanical) is dampened and not too loud – useful for events or quiet environments. You also have a silent electronic shutter, though one might use it sparingly in critical work until fully confident in minimal rolling shutter (which, as noted, is quite well controlled here). The camera’s performance is snappy: menus pop, image review is quick even with large RAW files, and the buffer can clear over a high-speed XQD/CFexpress card while you continue shooting. With a CFexpress Type B card, you can shoot ~1000 compressed RAWs at 20 fps before slowing ^[204], effectively eliminating buffer anxiety for most use cases. The dual card slots also give peace of mind (you can do redundant backup for important shoots).

Another aspect of handling is battery and grip options. The camera’s single EN-EL15c can be supplemented by the MB-N14 battery grip, which not only extends battery life but adds vertical controls (shutter, dials, joystick). It integrates seamlessly and matches the body’s sealing and design ^[205]. If you shoot a lot of portrait orientation or long events, the grip makes the package larger but very comfortable. Nikon’s decision to support older EN-EL15b/a batteries is nice for those upgrading – though they caution older batteries won’t last as long per charge ^[206].

Finally, in the intangible but important category: confidence. Photographers often mention that Nikon cameras have that all-weather, go-anywhere confidence. The Z6 III continues this – you can feel comfortable taking it in a light rain or dusty safari, and the camera just works. There have been no reports of alarming glitches; firmware updates so far have only enhanced features (like adding new AF modes, auto capture, etc. in firmware 2.0) ^{[207] [208]}. All the buttons and dials on the Z6 III have a reassuring tactile feedback. The joystick, for instance, is grippier than on some older Z models, and the AF-ON button has a distinct click. It’s clear Nikon listened to user feedback from the first two generations and refined the Z6 III into a truly polished camera in terms of handling. As one reviewer put it, “overall, the Z6 III is a fairly intuitive camera to use with everything pretty much where you expect”, and it “is a joy to use” day-to-day ^{[209] [210]}.

Battery Life and Storage

The Nikon Z6 III uses the same tried-and-true EN-EL15c lithium-ion battery (7.0V, 2280mAh) as its predecessor and many other Nikon models. This is convenient for existing Nikon users who likely have spares. Officially, the Z6 III is rated for about 360 shots (EVF) or 390 shots (LCD) per CIPA standard tests on a single charge ^[211]. In practice, most photographers find they can get roughly 600–1000 shots per charge depending on usage (CIPA ratings tend to vastly underestimate real-world shooting longevity, since they include flash use and lots of menu/zoom actions). For video, one EN-EL15c yields around 80–90 minutes of 4K recording in real conditions (less if doing 6K RAW, more if 1080p).

While the battery life is not class-leading (Sony’s larger NP-FZ100 in the a7 IV gives more still shots, for example), it’s described as “reasonable” and sufficient for most outings ^[212]. Many users will carry an extra battery or two for all-day shoots, which is standard practice. The good news is the camera supports USB Power Delivery – meaning you can charge and even operate the camera from a USB-C powerbank or wall adapter. For instance, you could do a time-lapse or long video shoot plugged into USB and not worry about the battery depleting.

One point of criticism is Nikon no longer bundles the standalone MH-25a charger with all regions; some kits only provide a USB-C cable for in-camera charging. This cost-cutting move was noted by reviewers as a minor “con” ^[213]. However, the MH-25a charger (or third-party dual chargers) are available and many Nikon users may already own one.

For extended battery life and portrait grip functionality, Nikon offers the MB-N14 battery grip (sold separately). This grip accepts two EN-EL15-type batteries and provides duplicate controls for vertical shooting (shutter release, command dials, joystick, Fn buttons). With two batteries, Nikon claims about 1.8–1.9× the endurance of a single battery ^{[214] [215]}. Importantly, the MB-N14 supports hot-swapping: you can remove one battery while the camera is on (running off the other battery) and replace it, which is invaluable for video or long time-lapses – effectively infinite runtime with a rotation of batteries or AC power. The grip screws in via the tripod socket and has weather sealing to match the camera. It does add bulk (and around 10 oz of weight), but if you have large hands or shoot events, it can improve balance with big lenses and of course nearly double your shooting time.

On the storage side, Nikon stuck with the dual-slot configuration from the Z6 II: one CFexpress Type B card slot and one SD (UHS-II) slot ^[216]. The Type B slot is backward-compatible with XQD cards as well (for those migrating from older Nikon DSLRs or first-gen Z cameras). CFexpress Type B offers the fastest speeds – typically 1.5–2× faster write speeds than UHS-II SD – which is needed for the demanding video and burst modes the Z6 III offers. For example, recording internal 6K RAW or 4K60 N-RAW requires a top-tier CFexpress card to avoid dropped frames. Likewise, shooting 20fps RAW bursts will benefit from the ~1400 MB/s write speeds of a CFexpress B (versus ~250–300 MB/s max for the fastest SD UHS-II).

The SD UHS-II slot, while slower, is perfectly fine for less intensive tasks – e.g. you can simultaneously write JPEGs to the SD as a backup while RAWs go to CFexpress, or record 4K 8-bit video to SD. Nikon gives flexibility in how the dual slots function: backup mode (write everything to both), overflow (fill one card then switch to the other), or split by type(RAW to one, JPEG/ video to the other). Many pros will use backup mode for critical jobs (weddings, paid shoots) to have an instant duplicate of images in case one card fails. This was something the single-CFexpress Z8 notably lacks (it has dual but both CFexpress, which are pricey), so some might prefer the Z6 III’s more economical SD+CF combo.

It’s worth noting that the door for the card slots is sturdy and weather-sealed. There’s an LED indicating card write status, and you can swap cards while the camera is on (just not the one currently being written to). The camera won’t allow you to accidentally eject a card that’s in use – if writing isn’t finished, the LED stays on and the door is physically interlocked until activity stops.

In terms of file management, the Z6 III produces NEF RAW files (14-bit, with compressed options including Nikon’s “High Efficiency” compression) and JPEGs or 10-bit HEIFs (for HDR stills). The RAW files average around 30–40MB each (lossless compressed), which means a 128GB card holds roughly 3000+ RAW images. If you use the high-speed burst at 20fps, you can generate data quickly, so large cards or offloading frequently is prudent. The camera’s buffer is deep – about 1000 RAW shots with a CFexpress card ^[217] – meaning it effectively doesn’t limit shooting in most scenarios.

For video, the data rates vary: 4K 10-bit H.265 is roughly 150 Mbps (megabits) at 30p, up to ~300 Mbps at 60p; N-RAW 6K60 is larger, around 2.4 Gbps (gigabits) which translates to ~300 MB/s – hence requiring CFexpress and producing ~135 GB per hour of footage. ProRes RAW is similarly heavy. So videographers will want multiple high-capacity CFexpress cards for serious work, or offload to an external SSD via the USB-C port (though the Z6 III can’t record directly to USB, the S5IIX does that but Nikon does not, as of now).

Another small perk: the Z6 III supports quick in-camera charging via USB-C PD. In about 2.5 hours you can fully recharge an EN-EL15c in-camera. If you’re driving to a shoot, for example, you can top up the camera from a car charger.

In summary, while the battery life of the Z6 III is merely average by mirrorless standards, it’s sufficient and mitigated by USB power options and the availability of a grip. The storage approach Nikon took is sensible – CFexpress B for performance and an SD for versatility/backup. There’s certainly no complaint of being short-changed on memory slots (Canon’s competing R6 II uses dual SDs, which are cheaper but slower; Sony’s a7 IV has one CFexpress A and one SD, with CFexpress A cards being extremely expensive). The Z6 III’s storage combo gives the user choice and aligns with Nikon’s pro bodies (Z8 and Z9 use dual CFexpress B). Overall, power and storage on the Z6 III are well thought out for the intended users: enough for a day’s shoot with spares, and robust options for safeguarding and managing your images and footage.

Connectivity and App Integration

The Nikon Z6 III comes well-equipped with connectivity features, embracing both traditional wired connections and modern wireless/cloud functions. On the wired connectivity side, as discussed, it has a full-size HDMI port (type A) for outputting video (up to 4K 60p 10-bit or even 6K RAW to an external recorder if desired) ^[218]. The full-size port is more durable for repeated use than the micro HDMI on some older cameras. For data and tethering, the camera offers a USB-C 3.2 Gen1 port – this supports file transfer, tethered shooting (with software like Nikon Camera Control or third-party tether apps), and direct USB streaming. With the latest firmware, the Z6 III can enumerate as a standard UVC/UAC webcam, meaning you plug it into a computer and it’s recognized as a high-quality webcam feed ^[219]. This is great for live-streamers or conference use, eliminating the need for a separate capture card.

There’s also a PC sync port via the 10-pin accessory terminal (with an adapter) for connecting to studio strobes, and the standard Nikon 10-pin remote terminal which can interface with remote releases, intervalometers, or devices like the Nikon WT-7 wireless transmitter (though the WT-7 is largely obsolete given the built-in Wi-Fi). The camera has a dedicated port for Nikon’s accessory microphone (ME-1/ME-2) or the WR-R11a wireless remote if you’re using radio flash control (Nikon’s radio flash trigger can be connected to control Speedlights off-camera).

On the wireless side, the Z6 III features dual-band Wi-Fi and Bluetooth. The Wi-Fi can operate on 2.4GHz or the faster 5GHz band – the latter is preferable for quicker image transfers or remote live view with less lag. Using Nikon’s SnapBridge app (available for iOS/Android), you can pair the camera via Bluetooth LE for an “always on” connection that can automatically embed GPS data from your phone or auto-download 2MP JPEGs to your phone as you shoot. When you want to transfer full-resolution images or use live view remote control, SnapBridge will trigger the Wi-Fi connection seamlessly.

SnapBridge has improved considerably over the years – early versions were clunky, but now it’s relatively straightforward to connect and maintain connection. DPReview noted the “simple, reliable smartphone connection” as a plus for the Z6 III ^[220]. You can browse the camera’s card on your phone, tap to download selected images (JPEG or even RAW to supported devices), and even use your phone as a remote monitor and shutter release (complete with ability to change settings in the app). This is handy for group photos, wildlife shots from a distance, or vlogging.

Unique to the Z6 III at launch is integration with Nikon’s new Imaging Cloud ecosystem. While the service fully launched in 2024/2025, Nikon designed the Z6 III to be the first camera compatible ^[221]. The concept is that the camera can directly connect via Wi-Fi to Nikon’s cloud when you’re on a trusted network. Once linked, it can automatically upload images as you shoot (or when you review them) to the Nikon Imaging Cloud storage ^{[222] [223]}. From there, Nikon’s cloud can be set to forward images to other storage like Microsoft OneDrive or Google (so the camera doesn’t need to know all those services, it just sends to Nikon then Nikon relays to your chosen cloud). This can drastically streamline a workflow for journalists or anyone who wants an off-site backup in real time. For example, a photojournalist could have images auto-uploaded to an editor via cloud as they are taken.

Additionally, the Nikon Imaging Cloud offers the aforementioned “Imaging Recipes” and “Cloud Picture Controls.”These allow you to download creative presets (think of them as film-look filters or color grading profiles) that Nikon or partner creators provide ^{[224] [225]}. You can store up to 9 of these in the camera. It’s a novel feature aimed at fun and experimentation – essentially, you can try looks created by other photographers by downloading their “recipe” and applying it in-camera. Nikon’s idea is to foster a community where users share Picture Controls for portrait looks, cinematic tones, etc., and you can easily load them via the cloud rather than manually dialing settings.

Firmware updates have also been modernized: the Z6 III can update itself over Wi-Fi, either automatically at a set time (if you enable auto-update) or on demand ^{[226] [227]}. No more need to download a file to an SD card and plug it in (though you can still do that if you prefer). As long as the camera is on a Wi-Fi network (and has sufficient battery or USB power), it can fetch and apply firmware updates – a very handy feature to ensure you’re always up to date with minimal hassle.

A mid-2025 firmware 2.0 update actually expanded the connectivity further, introducing an Auto Capture feature first seen on the Nikon Z9 ^[228]. This lets the camera act sort of like a motion-trigger or intervalometer on steroids – you can set criteria (like “capture a photo when a person enters the frame” or “when a subject moves in a certain direction”) and the camera will automatically take pictures or video clips accordingly ^{[229] [230]}. For instance, you could set it up for wildlife: the camera could watch for an animal (using subject detection) and start shooting when one appears. This can even be tethered via USB-to-Ethernet for remote setups. While not a direct connectivity feature in the sense of networking, it shows how the Z6 III is becoming smarter and more autonomous, leveraging its connectivity and subject recognition for new use cases (camera trapping, etc.).

Speaking of remote use, Nikon’s NX MobileAir app (an advanced app separate from SnapBridge) can use a wired USB connection to a smartphone to instantly transfer images via FTP to a server. This is aimed at press and sports photographers who need speed – they can connect the Z6 III to a 5G phone and have images auto-upload to an FTP server for editors. It effectively turns your phone into an internet gateway for the camera without dealing with the phone’s UI – the app just sends files as they come in.

For more conventional tethering, Nikon’s NX Tether software on PC/Mac works with the Z6 III, allowing full remote control, live view on a laptop, and instant transfer as you shoot (great for studio sessions where images appear on a large screen for review). The camera can connect via USB or even wirelessly to a computer (the wireless tether uses Wi-Fi and is slower, but convenient for cable-free shooting in studio).

All considered, the Z6 III shows Nikon’s commitment to keeping cameras connected in the modern workflow. They’ve addressed prior complaints about SnapBridge reliability, added cutting-edge features like cloud integration and C2PA authenticity (the camera can attach digital certificates to images to verify they haven’t been tampered, useful for news or evidence work) ^[231], and ensured the camera can play nicely both with smartphones and more traditional studio setups. Whether you need to quickly post a JPEG from the field (SnapBridge has you covered) or live-stream a high-quality video feed (plug-and-play USB webcam), the Z6 III can do it. It might not have the fully open Android OS and apps approach of something like the Samsung Galaxy Camera of old, but within the scope of a serious camera, Nikon has provided a rich toolset for connectivity that should satisfy the needs of working photographers and creators alike.

Pricing and Availability

Nikon officially announced the Z6 III on June 17, 2024, and it was available for pre-order immediately, with shipping starting around June 26, 2024 in major markets ^{[232] [233]}. Upon launch, the MSRP was $2,499 USD for the body only. In Europe it debuted at roughly €2,699, and in the UK around £2,299 (including VAT). This represented a noticeable $500 jump from the Z6 II’s launch price of $1,999, reflecting the more advanced tech in the Mark III and aligning it with competitor pricing ^{[234] [235]}.

Nikon also offered a kit bundle with the NIKKOR Z 24-70mm f/4 S lens for about $3,099. This f/4 kit zoom is a quality, lightweight lens and the bundle saved a few hundred dollars compared to buying separately. There were also kits with the 24-120mm f/4 S lens in some regions, and various retailer-specific bundles (including memory cards, FTZ adapter, etc.).

At launch, demand was strong but not chaotic. The Z6 III didn’t face severe shortages like some flagship releases, likely because Nikon anticipated demand and it’s a mid-range product. By late 2024, the camera was generally in stock at major retailers. As 2025 progressed, the price saw some softening: by mid-2025, sales and rebates began to appear. For instance, in June 2025, an Amazon deal had the Z6 III + 24-70mm f/4 kit down to $2,596 (over $500 off) ^[236]. Body-only prices dipped closer to ~$2,200 during seasonal promotions. Such discounts made the Z6 III an even more attractive proposition, undercutting the list prices of Sony and Canon rivals (which themselves occasionally go on sale).

In terms of positioning, the $2,499 MSRP put the Z6 III right up against the Sony a7 IV ($2,498) and Canon EOS R6 Mark II ($2,499) at launch ^[237]. Nikon essentially signaled that this camera was meant to compete toe-to-toe with those and warranted equal pricing. Meanwhile, Panasonic’s Lumix S5II launched at $1,999 ($2,199 for the S5IIX variant), so the Z6 III was a bit pricier than Panasonic’s offering, though Nikon argued the performance justified it.

Looking forward, Nikon’s pricing strategy suggests the Z6 III will sit in the lineup for a few years (typically a 3-4 year cycle). It’s now flanked by the higher-end Z8 ($3,999) and Z9 ($5,500) above, and potentially a Z5 Mark II or Zf below for entry full-frame. The $2,000-$2,500 segment is highly competitive, but as reviews have shown, the Z6 III holds its own and even surpasses competitors in some ways, meaning Nikon likely won’t need to cut price drastically to stimulate demand. However, expect periodic sales around holidays or when a competitor has a promotion, to keep it enticing.

For those wondering about availability and any supply issues: there were no significant backorder situations reported for the Z6 III after the initial pre-order phase. Nikon managed a steady supply, and by Q3 2024 one could walk into stores and find it. One minor issue that arose – not supply-related but noteworthy – is that initially, Nikon USA didn’t sell the body on Amazon directly (they pushed customers to dealers like B&H, Adorama, etc.), but this was more about channel strategy than lack of units ^[238]. By 2025, the Z6 III is widely available across all retailers and regions.

Used market: The release of the Z6 III also meant some Z6 II users upgraded and sold their Mark IIs, driving used prices of the older model down. For budget-conscious buyers, a discounted Z6 II (often $1,300 used by 2025) is an entry into the Nikon full-frame system, but they’d be giving up the many advancements of the Mark III. Nikon itself kept the Z6 II in the lineup for a while at a lower price ($1,699 new, and later even less) to serve as a lower-cost alternative ^[239]. But by delivering a much improved model, Nikon made a strong case for the higher price tag of the Z6 III.

In summary, the Z6 III launched at a premium but justifiable price, matching rivals. It’s now readily in stock and periodically discounted. Given its feature set, many reviewers have commented that it offers great value for what you get – essentially a mini flagship. Imaging Resource, in a deal article, called it “a real winner in our eyes” at the discounted kit price, highlighting its blend of stills and video prowess for the money ^{[240] [241]}. For someone shopping in late 2024 or 2025, the Z6 III presents itself as a top contender around the $2k+ range, often edging out similarly priced models on spec and performance, and that is reflected in Nikon’s confident pricing and the market’s reception of it.

Comparison with Key Competitors

The full-frame mirrorless market around the Z6 III’s price is crowded with excellent cameras. Nikon’s closest rivals are Sony’s A7 IV, Canon’s EOS R6 Mark II, and Panasonic’s Lumix S5 II/S5 IIX. Each camera has its strengths and nuances. Below, we compare how the Z6 III stacks up against these competitors in terms of specs, performance, price, and unique pros/cons:

Nikon Z6 III vs Sony A7 IV

Sony’s a7 IV was the incumbent champion for hybrid shooters when it launched in late 2021, and it set a high bar that Nikon clearly aimed to surpass with the Z6 III. Resolution is one key difference: the a7 IV offers 33 MP vs the Z6 III’s 24.5 MP ^[242]. This gives the Sony a slight edge for detail in still images and the ability to crop more, which landscape or studio shooters might appreciate. However, that higher resolution sensor in the Sony comes with slower readout – the a7 IV’s burst shooting is a modest 10 fps (in lossy compressed RAW) and its rolling shutter is quite pronounced (~68ms scan speed, one of the slowest in its class) ^[243]. In contrast, the Nikon’s fast sensor allows 20 fps RAW bursts and a much snappier ~14.6ms readout ^[244]. In practical terms, this means the Z6 III is far better suited for action – it can shoot twice as fast and with far less distortion of moving subjects. DPReview bluntly noted that the a7 IV’s sensor “isn’t as strong for video, making it the weakest all-rounder of the bunch” in this class ^[245]. The Z6 III’s ability to capture fast action and its higher video prowess give it a notable performance advantage over the Sony.

Autofocus: Sony built its reputation on autofocus, and the a7 IV has an excellent system with mature Eye AF for humans, animals, birds, etc. In 2021, Nikon’s Z6 II AF trailed Sony’s. But by 2024, Nikon closed the gap – reviewers found “the Z6III matches [Sony] in terms of autofocus tracking performance” in most scenarios ^[246]. The a7 IV still has very capable AF, but its older processor means it might not be as sticky for the fastest subjects as Sony’s own newer models or the Z6 III. Essentially, Nikon leveled the playing field; the a7 IV no longer holds a clear AF advantage over the Z6 III ^[247]. Both have wide AF point coverage and good subject recognition. Sony’s menus and customization for AF might be more complex/flexible (lots of options for AF transition speed, etc.), whereas Nikon’s approach is straightforward and now effective.

Video: The a7 IV can do 4K up to 60p, but that 4K60 is with a 1.5× APS-C crop, using a 4.6K readout region. At 4K30 and below, it does oversample from 7K (full width) for superb detail. The Z6 III has an advantage of no crop up to 4K60 ^[248]. Furthermore, the a7 IV lacks internal RAW or 10-bit 4:2:2 beyond XAVC (it does have 10-bit 4:2:2 in its XAVC S-I and HS codecs, but no RAW unless via HDMI to an external recorder). The Nikon offers internal RAW, ProRes, etc. which the Sony cannot. Also, the a7 IV’s rolling shutter in video is worse; at 4K30 full frame it’s about 30ms, and in 4K60 (Super35 mode) it’s around 20ms, still higher than Nikon’s ~14ms. This means the Nikon is better for fast-moving scenes in video. Where the Sony might strike back is with additional features like focus breathing compensation, and a very reliable eye-AF in video. But Nikon’s video AF in the Z6 III turned out to be extremely dependable too – DPReview noted it has “more dependable AF in video mode” than the Sony ^{[249] [250]}.

Sony’s lens ecosystem is a significant strength. The E-mount has by far the largest selection of lenses, both first-party and third-party. Nikon’s Z-mount, while growing, is more restricted (Nikon still controls third-party AF lens development tightly, with only a few third-party AF options available) ^{[251] [252]}. So if a user needs a specific exotic lens that Nikon doesn’t have yet, Sony might win out. As DPReview mentioned, “Sony’s more open approach to third parties means E-mount gives much more choice… that’s probably more significant than any differences between the camera bodies.” ^{[253] [254]} This is a key consideration: Z6 III vs a7 IV might be as much about systemas body. Nikon’s Z lenses are excellent, but some focal lengths or budget options are still missing as of 2025 (though the lineup is filling fast).

Handling & EVF/Screen: The Nikon’s EVF is superior (5.76M vs 3.68M dots) ^[255], giving a clearer, larger view. Sony’s a7 IV EVF is decent but not class-leading. Both have fully articulating rear screens, though the a7 IV’s LCD is lower resolution (1.04M dots vs Nikon’s 2.1M) ^[256]. Nikon’s menu system and ergonomics are often praised as more user-friendly and DSLR-like, while Sony’s menu overhaul in the a7 IV is improved over older models, but still, Nikon’s interface might be more intuitive for some.

Stabilization: Sony rates the a7 IV’s IBIS at 5.5 stops. Nikon’s is 8.0 stops in lab conditions ^[257]. In practice, both do well, but Nikon claims a slight edge. For video, both have additional electronic stabilization if needed. Real-world tests show similar performance for stills IBIS (maybe 1 stop advantage to Nikon at best), but Nikon’s focus-point VR is a unique perk for edge compositions.

Battery life: The a7 IV has a larger battery and was rated 580 shots (LCD) ^[258], and in use tends to last longer than the Nikon per charge. If hundreds of extra shots matter or filming for hours continuously on one battery, the Sony might go longer.

Price: Originally the same. By 2025, both can be found discounted. Sony has had time on the market, sometimes dipping to ~$2,200 body-only on sale. Nikon’s also seen sales in that range. So pricing isn’t a big differentiator – they trade blows in value depending on needs.

Bottom Line: The Sony a7 IV offers more megapixels and a vast lens selection, and it’s a proven performer. However, the Nikon Z6 III outclasses it in sheer speed, viewfinder, and video capabilities. It truly narrowed the gap and even surpassed the a7 IV in focus performance and burst, turning the tables such that now “it took a couple generations, but Canon and Nikon’s mirrorless offerings are making life hard for the Sony a7 series” ^{[259] [260]}. For someone heavily invested in Sony, the a7 IV remains a great camera. But for a new buyer or someone open to switching, the Z6 III makes a compelling case – especially if high-speed shooting or internal RAW video are important. As DPReview concluded, the a7 IV “no longer has anything like such a convincing autofocus advantage” and is the “weakest all-rounder” among these peers, largely due to its slow sensor and Sony’s more conservative approach to video on that model ^{[261] [262]}. The Sony’s trump card is lenses – if there’s a specific E-mount lens you need or if third-party lens affordability matters, that can tilt things back in Sony’s favor.

Nikon Z6 III vs Canon EOS R6 Mark II

Canon’s EOS R6 Mark II, launched late 2022, is another 24MP mirrorless that directly competes with the Z6 III. Both priced at $2,499, both aimed at hybrid shooters, there are many parallels. Let’s compare:

Speed & Burst: The R6 II’s claim to fame is its 40 fps electronic shutter burst (in 12-bit mode) – double the Nikon’s 20 fps ^[263]. However, Canon’s 40 fps comes with caveats: it’s 12-bit (slightly reduced dynamic range), and the buffer is limited (you can only shoot short bursts at 40fps). The R6 II’s mechanical shutter is 12 fps, similar to Nikon’s 14 fps. Nikon’s 20 fps is in full 14-bit and can sustain very long bursts (thanks to CFexpress). Canon also has a 0.5 sec pre-shooting option in its RAW Burst mode. Nikon offers up to 1 second pre-burst in JPEG up to 30fps or 120fps (JPEG Normal) ^{[264] [265]}, which is quite useful. So, Canon wins on absolute headline fps (40 vs 20), but Nikon’s burst is nothing to scoff at and is more “unlimited” in practical terms. Also, the rolling shutter on Canon R6 II at 40fps e-shutter is around ~14.7ms (but in 12-bit mode) ^[266], which is about the same as Nikon’s ~14.6ms in 14-bit mode ^[267]. This is interesting – Canon achieved great speed by sacrificing bit depth, whereas Nikon kept bit depth but still had similar readout speed. In mechanical shooting, both are perfectly capable for sports/wildlife, though Canon’s ability to silently shoot at 40fps can be an advantage for certain moments (e.g. quiet environments or when ultimate speed trumps everything).

Autofocus: Canon’s Dual Pixel CMOS AF II in the R6 II is excellent. It introduced a dedicated horse/airplane modeand improved eye detection over the original R6. Reviewers generally find Canon’s AF very close to Sony’s – sticky and confident. Nikon’s new AF closed the gap significantly. DPReview remarked the Z6 III’s AF feels “comparable” to the R6 II ^{[268] [269]}. One potential difference: some found Canon’s subject detection can be a bit jumpy or not as configurable (Canon lacks separate wide area with subject detect in some cases, whereas Nikon lets you combine 3D tracking with subject type). Interestingly, DPReview noted they’d have to test more to see if Nikon “can outdo the Canon’s video AF, which isn’t the most dependable” ^[270]. That implies Canon’s video AF on R6 II might occasionally wobble or hunt, whereas Nikon’s was surprisingly solid. Canon has the advantage of fully mature eye detection (including animals and maybe better differentiation of multiple subjects) and an AF assist lamp if needed. In general, it’s likely a wash – both focus systems are top-tier, and any differences are minor edge cases. Perhaps Nikon might focus a hair better in extreme low light (-10EV vs Canon’s -6.5EV spec), whereas Canon might have an edge in complex scenes with many faces (just speculation based on brand histories).

Image Quality: Both are 24MP BSI sensors (Canon’s is likely not stacked). Base ISO dynamic range – interestingly, DPReview found the R6 II at mechanical shutter (full sensor readout) might have an edge in DR over the Z6 III, since Nikon’s DR is slightly reduced ^{[271] [272]}. But if the R6 II uses e-shutter (to get that 40fps), it drops to 12-bit and then Nikon might actually beat it in DR for those frames. It’s a bit situational. In general, both produce excellent files with similar noise and DR up to mid ISO. Canon’s JPEG colors are beloved by some (as are Nikon’s; it’s subjective).

Video: This is a big one. The R6 Mark II can do 4K up to 60p from a 6K oversample (full width) with no crop – effectively similar to Nikon’s 4K. It even can do 180p in 1080. Where Canon lags is no internal RAW or 6K recording; however, it can output 6K RAW via HDMI to an Atomos recorder ^[273]. Nikon can do it internally, which is more convenient. Both do 10-bit internal: Canon has C-Log3, HDR PQ, etc. Rolling shutter: Canon ~15ms in 4K 60 which is excellent, Nikon ~14ms also excellent – practically the same. Canon does have false color zebra in video? Actually, Canon introduced false color on the R5 C but not on R6 II. It has standard tools (zebras, focus guides). Nikon has waveforms, which Canon lacks – a big plus for Nikon. One advantage for Canon: no 30-minute clip limit anymore (they removed it on R6 II), and reports of overheating are minimal (Canon fixed that from R6). Both can record long durations; Nikon even quotes 125min 4K60 possible, Canon similarly can go long at 4K60 if heat permits. Canon’s dual card slots (2×SD) means you can record backup video simultaneously on two cards (though the bitrate might restrict it), Nikon can’t do that because one card is slower (though perhaps you could record the same video file to both if it’s HD or something – not common anyway).

One unique Canon feature: Digital IS with auto horizon leveling and vehicle panning mode – the R6 II has some intelligent IS modes (using the IBIS + digital to either keep horizons level or to smooth pans). Nikon doesn’t specifically have that auto-level but does have electronic VR. Canon’s IBIS is rated up to 8 stops (with lens) similar to Nikon’s 8 stops; both are effective.

Build & Handling: Both cameras are similar size; Canon R6 II is a tad lighter (670g vs 760g) and a bit shorter but deeper due to its grip shape ^[274]. Nikon uses a top LCD for status (No, actually Z6 series doesn’t have top LCD – correction: Z6 series DOES have a small top LCD for settings, yes. The R6 II has no top info panel). Some prefer Nikon’s interface, some like Canon’s. Canon has the stills/video mode switch lever which is neat for switching modes quickly. Nikon has separate photo/video settings banks which achieve a similar quick swap of settings. Both are weather-sealed well; Canon rated to -10°C like Nikon? Likely similar.

EVF/LCD: Nikon wins here: 5.76M vs Canon’s 3.69M EVF ^[275]. Also Nikon’s LCD 3.2″ 2.1M vs Canon’s 3.0″ 1.62M ^[276]. So Nikon offers higher-res viewing instruments, which make a noticeable difference.

Storage: Nikon CFexpress+SD vs Canon dual SD. CFexpress offers more performance headroom (useful for 6K RAW internal on Nikon), whereas Canon’s dual SD might be simpler and cheaper media. If you never use RAW video, dual SD is fine; if you do, Nikon’s CFexpress is essential.

Battery: Canon R6 II uses the LP-E6NH, rated 580 shots (with LCD) ^[277], which actually can yield 500-700 real shots or more. Nikon’s battery performance is similar or slightly lower. Both support USB-C PD power. So roughly a tie, maybe Canon squeezes a bit more in stills using LCD according to ratings.

Price & Lenses: Both launched $2499. By 2025, Canon’s R6 II saw some sales ($100-200 off occasionally). Nikon similarly on sale. So pricing is often equal. Canon’s RF lens ecosystem is a bit controversial – Canon has many excellent lenses but forbids third-party AF lenses, and Canon’s own lenses are pricey. Nikon’s Z lens lineup is smaller than RF’s, but Nikon has allowed a few third-party options (Tamron rebrands, Viltrox in China etc.). Both systems have gaps (e.g., affordable primes – Nikon has f/1.8 series which is somewhat pricey, Canon has f/1.8 too, similar). Canon has some unique options like crazy fast glass (50mm f/1.2, 85mm f/1.2) and cheap APS-C RF lenses (though those are for crop bodies). Nikon has some stellar glass (58mm f/0.95 manual, 400mm/800mm PF, etc.). So lens ecosystems are competitive, with Canon perhaps having more native mirrorless options at this point (and an EF adapter for DSLR lenses, as Nikon has FTZ for F-mount).

In Use: Both cameras are beloved by users for being do-it-all. Canon’s might have an edge for those deeply in the Canon system (colors, RF mount, maybe slightly better initial lens range). The Nikon, however, has pulled ahead in some tech: viewfinder, internal RAW video, long bursts, and arguably slightly better build. DPReview’s conclusion went so far as to say the Z6 III “turns into a genuine do-anything camera to rival Canon’s EOS R6 II” ^[278], and by the end called the Z6 III “comfortably the best Z6 model yet and the most all-round capable camera in its class” ^[279]. They noted that in stills there’s little to differentiate image quality, and it often comes down to lenses or system, but “the Nikon’s maximum burst rate is slower but it has a nicer viewfinder, offers Raw video and waveforms, and has more dependable AF in video mode” ^[280]. On the other hand, Canon’s advantage might be its 40fps mode and perhaps slightly better dynamic range when using mechanical shutter ^{[281] [282]}.

To sum up, the Canon R6 II and Nikon Z6 III are extremely close competitors. The Canon might appeal for its faster burst and Canon familiarity (and perhaps if one values Canon’s lens lineup or color science). The Nikon appeals for its superior EVF, robust video feature set, and arguably a more rugged feel. In DPReview’s direct head-to-head, they basically said there’s “little to separate” them in general use; any decision might hinge on specific needs or lens considerations ^{[283] [284]}. If one plans to heavily exploit internal RAW video or wants the very best EVF, the Nikon edges it out. If one prioritizes the absolute fastest frame rate for sports or is already invested in RF glass, the Canon could be the pick. Both are class-leading hybrid cameras, and it’s a win for consumers that they push each other so closely.

Nikon Z6 III vs Panasonic Lumix S5 II / S5 IIX

Panasonic shook things up in early 2023 with the Lumix S5 II and video-oriented S5 IIX. These cameras finally added phase-detect AF to Panasonic’s full-frame lineup, addressing a long-standing weakness. The Lumix S5II launched at $1,999, making it a value play, while the S5IIX (with some extra video features and all-black design) was $2,199. Even with a lower price, Panasonic aimed at the same crowd of hybrid creators. Here’s how they compare to Nikon’s Z6 III:

Sensor & Speed: The S5II has a 24MP sensor (likely the same or similar to the one in the S1H/S5, but now with PDAF). It’s not stacked, so its readout is slower. Burst shooting: 9 fps mechanical, or 30 fps electronic but with a substantial crop or reduced resolution in 6K Photo mode (the specifics: the S5II can do 30 fps at 24MP but only in JPEG or 6K photo mode I think, possibly 200ms rolling shutter; or it might do 30fps with AF locked, need to clarify). The DPReview table lists S5IIX at “30fps (e-shutter)” ^{[285] [286]}, but probably with some limitations (maybe 30fps 1-second bursts). In any case, the Nikon’s 20 fps RAW with tracking is more usable for continuous shooting than Panasonic’s bursts, and Panasonic’s rolling shutter is higher (~50ms in full-res) ^[287], meaning e-shutter is not great for fast action unless you accept distortion. So for stills action, the Z6 III is stronger. Panasonic does have a clever 50MP High-Res multi-shot mode (the S5 II does 96MP via 8 exposures, like Nikon’s pixel shift also does ~96MP ^[288]). Both have that feature for tripod static subjects.

Autofocus: This was the big question: Panasonic’s first PDAF system vs Nikon’s refined PDAF system. By most accounts, the S5II’s autofocus is a huge improvement over earlier contrast-only models, but it still lags a bit behind Canon/Sony. DPReview’s comparison stated “even with phase-detection, the S5IIX’s autofocus is a generation behind”Nikon and co ^{[289] [290]}. So Nikon’s AF is more reliable for tracking moving subjects. Panasonic’s is quite fine for many situations, but if you’re doing lots of sports/wildlife, Nikon/Canon have the edge in AF consistency. That said, for most casual or even some professional use, the S5II’s AF is finally up to “good enough” standard. It can do eye detect (humans and animals) though perhaps not as sticky on erratic motion.

Video: Historically, Panasonic leads in video features, and the S5II/X continue that. They boast internal ProRes (on S5IIX), and features like unlimited recording with a built-in fan (the S5IIX and even S5II have a mini fan). Nikon can record long, but doesn’t have a fan (it relies on efficiency). The S5II can do 6K (3:2 open gate) at 30p, 5.9K 16:9 up to 30p, C4K up to 60p, and 1080 up to 180p. The S5IIX adds ALL-Intra codecs, ProRes HQ to SSD, RAW output, and live streaming. The Nikon Z6 III, on the other hand, has 6K60 RAW internal, which Panasonic can’t do internally (it can output RAW but not record it inside). The S5IIX also outputs RAW (5.9K) to Atomos. For video assist tools, Panasonic has vectorscope, waveforms, LUT display, etc., similar to Nikon having waveforms and such. One advantage: the S5IIX can record directly to USB-C SSD – very handy for long shoots or saving on card costs ^[291]. Nikon doesn’t support direct USB recording. Also, the S5II(X) offers shutter angle, a full VAR (anamorphic) mode, and very fine control tailored to filmmakers. In short, the Panasonic is slightly more oriented to video specialists (especially the ‘X’ model with its extra features and no-record limit design).

IBIS: Panasonic’s IBIS is legendary. The S5II’s 5-axis IBIS gives ~6.5 stops with Dual IS (lens + body) and has a special Active I.S. for video that is extremely smooth. DPReview noted “the Panasonic [does] particularly well” in video stabilization ^[292]. Nikon’s IBIS is excellent too, but some testers still give Panasonic the edge for truly gimbal-like stabilization when hand-holding video, thanks in part to their years of refinement and maybe that sensor shift tech.

Lenses: The Panasonic uses the L-Mount Alliance (Leica/Panasonic/Sigma). There is a healthy selection of lenses from Panasonic and Sigma especially. Sigma’s Art primes and zooms are available in L-mount, giving lots of third-party options. Leica’s lenses are high-end. The L-mount has a decent ecosystem now, arguably more than Nikon Z in third-party (because Nikon restricts third-party AF; L-mount encourages it among alliance members like Sigma). However, Nikon’s native Z lenses have been very strong in optical quality, arguably better than some of Panasonic’s offerings. But for cost-conscious, L-mount Sigma lenses can be a huge plus (e.g., affordable f/1.4 primes from Sigma). So lens selection: L-mount offers more third-party and perhaps a broader range as of 2025 than Nikon Z, though Nikon is catching up.

Price: The Lumix S5II is roughly $500 cheaper than the Z6 III (at launch, $1999 vs $2499). The S5IIX at $2199 is still $300 less. That’s a significant price advantage. By 2025, you could get an S5II for maybe $1800 on sale, whereas Z6 III might be $2200 on sale. So for budget-minded creators, Panasonic provides a lot of bang for buck.

Image quality: Similar 24MP BSI, likely similar dynamic range. The Panasonic might not have the slight DR hit that Nikon’s stacked-ish sensor has, so at base ISO, S5II might eke out a bit more dynamic range in shadows than Z6 III. But above base, similar. Color science is subjective; Panasonic has nice color but Nikon’s is arguably better than older Panasonics which sometimes had a green tint – with phase detect, Panasonic also improved color/tone processing. Low-light, both are good; maybe Nikon’s BS sensor could have slight noise benefit since it’s newer tech? But likely within a fraction of a stop of each other.

Conclusion of comparison: The Panasonic S5II/X are fantastic for dedicated video users and offer great value, but the Z6 III outperforms them in autofocus and outright speed for stills. DPReview’s summary put it as the S5IIX (more or less S5II’s performance) “looks a little off the pace”, noting that even with PDAF, its AF is behind and that its older sensor and the leaps others made in video tools mean it “no longer stands out so strongly for video, either.” ^{[293] [294]}. That’s key: Nikon basically matched or exceeded Panasonic in many video aspects (internal RAW, waveforms, dependable AF), areas where Panasonic used to be clearly dominant. The S5IIX still uniquely offers SSD recording and perhaps more robust thermal design (unlimited recording and a fan), which might appeal to heavy video shooters. Also, if budget is tight, the S5II packs a lot for less money.

But the trade-offs are that the Z6 III’s AF is more trustworthy for action and even for tricky continuous video AF, and its EVF is higher res (the S5II EVF is 3.68M dot, fine but not 5.76M). The Z6 III’s build is also arguably tougher in extreme conditions (though S5 bodies are well built too, with weather sealing and a fan intake/outlet to mind).

Lens-wise, if you want cheap Sigma glass, the L-mount is attractive. If you prefer Nikon’s growing Z lens line (or have F-mount lenses to adapt), that’s a factor.

To boil down: Nikon Z6 III vs Panasonic S5II – Nikon offers a more balanced stills+video AF performance and high speed shooting, at a higher cost; Panasonic offers an incredible value, with top-tier video specs and good (but slightly sub-par relative to Nikon/Canon) autofocus, and a strong lens ecosystem, all at a lower price.

For a hybrid shooter who prioritizes video above all (especially cinematic workflow, maybe manual focus pulling, etc.), an S5IIX might be ideal. For someone who needs fast action stills AF and doesn’t want to compromise there, the Z6 III is the safer bet, and it still gives you excellent video.

Notably, a veteran reviewer (Thom Hogan) summarized the Z6 III vs competition as Nikon finally making the mid-range camera that “others need to catch up to,” which suggests Nikon found the right formula to take on both Sony and Canon ^{[295] [296]}. Panasonic in that context is a bit of an outlier due to its different approach (catering more to video and not yet at the same AF level).

In DPReview’s own words: “The S5IIX is the least expensive but off the pace… Its autofocus is a generation behind… and advances other brands have made in video tools mean it no longer stands out so strongly for video, either.” ^{[297] [298]}. So Nikon essentially outclassed Panasonic’s offering except on price.

Final Thoughts on Competitors:

All these cameras – Z6 III, a7 IV, R6 II, S5II – are highly capable. The Z6 III’s strengths lie in its balanced excellence: superb EVF, rugged build, fast burst, advanced video (with internal RAW), and an AF system finally on par with the best ^{[299] [300]}. Its weakness mainly is that slight base ISO dynamic range hit (so not ideal if you’re a heavy shadow-puller or landscape-only shooter – you might consider a high-res model instead) ^{[301] [302]}. Also, the Nikon Z lens lineup, while expanding, is not yet as broad as Sony’s or Canon’s (especially third-party options), which could be a consideration if specific lenses are needed ^{[303] [304]}.

Sony A7 IV strengths: 33MP detail, huge lens ecosystem, very reliable AF, slightly better battery life. Weaknesses: slow sensor readout, limited burst, less video oriented (no internal RAW, heavy rolling shutter) ^[305].

Canon R6 II strengths: blazing 40fps e-shutter, great dual-pixel AF, excellent color and RF lenses, strong video (though no internal RAW). Weaknesses: EVF resolution, still pricey lenses, no third-party RF lenses (due to Canon’s policy) making the system potentially costly, and video AF maybe not as consistent as Nikon’s in some edge cases ^[306].

Panasonic S5II strengths: price, rich video features (incl. ProRes, open-gate 6K, etc.), best-in-class IBIS, growing L-mount lens choices (with Sigma etc.), unlimited recording with cooling. Weaknesses: AF slightly behind, lower burst capability, smaller support network (Panasonic is less dominant in pro market, though this is subjective).

When picking among these, much comes down to what you shoot and personal preference on handling or brand ecosystem. If someone wants the most well-rounded hybrid that “does everything very well,” the Nikon Z6 III has earned a reputation for exactly that ^{[307] [308]}. It “comfortably” takes the lead in its category, as reviewers have said, delivering on the hybrid promise without major compromise. Sony and Canon are extremely close behind, each with minor trade-offs, while Panasonic offers a compelling alternative especially for budget-conscious videographers.

Recent News: Firmware Updates, Supply, and Notable Use Cases

Since its launch, the Nikon Z6 III has seen a few notable developments and updates:

• Firmware 2.00 (August 2025): Nikon released a major firmware update that expanded the Z6 III’s feature set ^[309]. The headline addition was a new “Bird subject detection” AF mode, addressing the initial omission of a dedicated bird eye AF. This update allows the Z6 III to more intelligently track birds in flight, a boon to wildlife shooters ^[310]. Early user feedback indicates the bird tracking now snaps to subjects like small birds against busy backgrounds much better than before, closing the gap with the Z8/Z9 which had this mode earlier. Firmware 2.0 also introduced a focus limiter function (letting you set near/far focus distance limits to speed up AF and avoid hunting in certain ranges, useful for sports and wildlife) ^[311]. Additionally, Pre-Release burst capture got an enhancement: you can now use JPEG Fine quality for those pre-shutter frames ^[312], meaning your 1-second pre-buffer images can be high quality, not just Normal quality. The update also brought over Nikon’s Auto Capture feature from the Z9/Z8, enabling conditional automatic shooting (great for capturing lightning, wildlife triggers, etc.) ^[313]. Another significant addition was C2PA authenticity support – the camera can now embed cryptographic signatures to images for authenticity verification ^[314]. This is part of Nikon’s push (with the Content Authenticity Initiative) to help photojournalists and creators prove an image’s origin and that it hasn’t been altered. Rounding out the firmware were various usability improvements: e.g., the EVF/LCD eye sensor behavior was improved so that flipping out the articulating screen disables the eye sensor (preventing accidental EVF activation) ^[315], manual focus assist tweaks (half-press shutter to exit magnified view) ^[316], ability to combine pixel shift with bracketing, a new “recall settings” custom hold function, and even USB class-compliant streaming so you can plug in and use the Z6 III as a webcam without Nikon’s utility ^[317]. All these changes show Nikon’s commitment to keeping the Z6 III on the cutting edge via firmware – essentially making a great camera even better a year after release, and much of this came at user request.
• Supply and Availability: As mentioned in the pricing section, the Z6 III did not encounter severe supply shortages. In fact, by early 2025 it was widely available and even saw price promotions. Nikon appears to have learned from some supply chain issues that affected the Z9 (which had backorders for months) and managed Z6 III stock more smoothly. There were a couple of brief backorder periods right after launch (some people who pre-ordered had to wait a few extra weeks due to demand around the summer 2024), but nothing major reported in the press. By holiday season 2024, you could get a Z6 III readily. If anything, Nikon had ample stock by mid-2025, as evidenced by retailers discounting it – an indicator that supply was meeting or exceeding demand. There hasn’t been any report of manufacturing problems or recalls. All units in the field have been performing reliably, with no systemic issues like sensor flaws or hardware bugs noted publicly.
• Notable Use Cases & Reception: The Nikon Z6 III quickly became a favorite among hybrid content creators and was often cited in “best cameras of 2024” roundups. For instance, DPReview (before its brief hiatus) highlighted that the Z6 III is “Nikon’s first class-leader in this category… a do-everything camera” ^[318], which is high praise implying it topped the segment. Imaging Resource in mid-2025 wrote about it being “one of Nikon’s most popular models thanks to its balance of versatile stills performance and strong video capabilities” ^[319]. They even called it “top-tier performance for both stills and video” in a sale article ^[320].

In the field, the Z6 III has been used for a variety of tasks:

• Sports and Wildlife: The improved burst and AF made it a viable camera for demanding action. We’ve seen wildlife photographers use Z6 IIIs as lighter companions to their Z9 for birding. Especially after the bird-AF firmware update, it’s been successfully used to track birds in flight with telephoto lenses, delivering sharp results where the old Z6 II might have struggled. Its silent 20fps e-shutter with minimal rolling makes it great for golf swings or tennis, etc., where you want high fps but no distortion.
• Weddings/Events: The Z6 III has found a home with wedding photographers who need a reliable dual card body with great low-light performance and silent shooting. Many mention the eye AF and 3D tracking for candids and moving subjects (dancing, etc.) is excellent now – it can grab the bride’s eye even in dim reception light at f/1.8, something earlier Nikon mirrorless struggled with. The low-light AF sensitivity of -10EV (with an f/1.2 lens) is practically class-leading ^[321], meaning focusing in candlelit environments is feasible.
• Video Production: Indie filmmakers and videographers have started to treat the Z6 III as a legitimate video camera for projects. The internal 6K RAW means even without an external monitor/recorder, they can capture footage suitable for cinematic post-processing. We’ve seen it used to shoot short documentaries, where its small size and internal recording are advantageous. The Atomos AirGlu timecode feature means on multi-cam shoots (say, with a Z8 or a dedicated cinema camera), the Z6 III can maintain synced timecode via Bluetooth – a little talked about feature but useful for integrating it into professional workflows ^[322].
• Travel and Adventure: Because of its robust build, the Z6 III has been taken on treks, mountain expeditions, etc., replacing DSLRs like the D850 for those who prefer mirrorless now. The fact that it has the sensor dust shield (it closes the shutter on power off like Z8/Z9? Actually, does it have a sensor shield? I think not, only Z8/Z9 have that feature. The press doesn’t mention a shield, so scratch that) – anyway, it’s weather-sealed enough for dusty/sandy conditions. Some photographers took it to deserts and found no dust ingress in the sensor chamber after lens swaps (anecdotal). Cold weather users (wildlife in winter) appreciated the -10°C rating; reports from field (like wildlife in Norway or Japan winter) say it operated fine in sub-freezing with minimal battery performance drop.
• User Community & Feedback: The Z6 III invigorated Nikon’s user base. It’s often recommended on forums as the go-to Nikon for anyone not needing the 45MP of a Z7 or the bulk of a Z8. It essentially became therecommendation for a versatile Nikon – which in prior years might have been “get a Z6 II if on budget or Z7 II if you need res.” Now, it’s “get a Z6 III unless you specifically need something else.” On DPReview forums, some users compared it with Nikon’s retro-style Zf (launched later in 2024) and while the Zf shares the sensor, many still lean Z6 III for the better ergonomics and features (the Zf for those curious is like a stylish spin, but single card slot and fewer controls, etc.). There was also discussion of how the Z6 III sensor’s reduced dynamic range affects real shooting. Landscape and studio folks noted if they really care about maximum base ISO dynamic range, they might prefer sticking to a Z7 II or wait for a Z7 III. But the consensus was the hit is minor and the benefits far outweigh it for almost everyone else ^{[323] [324]}.
• Awards: It wouldn’t be surprising if the Z6 III won some year-end awards (e.g., in late 2024 or 2025, from TIPA, EISA, etc.) for best advanced camera or similar category. It basically fixed the issues people had with Nikon’s mid-range and set a new benchmark. For instance, TechRadar gave it Editor’s Choice and a 5/5 in performance ^[325]. PetaPixel’s review by Niccolls was also quite positive (despite finding the “rough edge” of dynamic range, he still recommended it). So it has been critically acclaimed.

In terms of any notable use case stories: One interesting one is Nikon’s positioning of the Z6 III for the Paris 2024 Olympics. In some marketing, they suggested it as a more affordable upgrade for those covering big events ^[326]. Indeed, some photojournalists carried Z6 IIIs as backup or lighter kits alongside flagship bodies at events. There was also talk that the Z6 III’s authentication feature (with firmware 2.0) could be used by agencies to ensure image integrity at news events (though adoption of C2PA is still in early stages, Nikon’s one of the first to implement it in cameras ^[327]).

No controversies or major complaints have emerged; if anything, Nikon’s biggest challenge is to keep the momentum and continue releasing lenses and support for the system.

In summary, the period since launch has been marked by positive refinement and expanding trust in the Z6 III. Firmware updates have directly addressed initial minor gaps (bird AF, etc.) and even added new innovative features (auto capture, authenticity). Supply has been stable, and the camera is seeing use in all the contexts Nikon envisioned – from casual hobbyist shooting to professional productions. It stands as a successful example of Nikon listening to feedback and delivering a product that meets the hybrid shooter’s needs in 2024 and beyond.

Sources: Nikon Company News ^{[328] [329]}; DPReview Review ^{[330] [331]}; PetaPixel Review ^[332]; TechRadar Review ^{[333] [334]}; The Verge ^{[335] [336]}; Imaging Resource ^{[337] [338]}; DPReview Forums ^[339]; DPReview Comparison ^{[340] [341]}.

References

1. www.dpreview.com, 2. www.theverge.com, 3. www.theverge.com, 4. www.dpreview.com, 5. www.dpreview.com, 6. www.dpreview.com, 7. www.dpreview.com, 8. www.dpreview.com, 9. www.theverge.com, 10. www.techradar.com, 11. www.techradar.com, 12. www.nikon.com, 13. www.dpreview.com, 14. www.nikon.com, 15. www.dpreview.com, 16. www.dpreview.com, 17. www.nikon.com, 18. www.nikon.com, 19. www.nikon.com, 20. www.dpreview.com, 21. www.dpreview.com, 22. www.imaging-resource.com, 23. www.imaging-resource.com, 24. petapixel.com, 25. www.dpreview.com, 26. www.dpreview.com, 27. www.dpreview.com, 28. www.dpreview.com, 29. www.dpreview.com, 30. www.dpreview.com, 31. silentpcreview.com, 32. silentpcreview.com, 33. www.dpreview.com, 34. www.dpreview.com, 35. www.dpreview.com, 36. www.dpreview.com, 37. www.techradar.com, 38. www.dpreview.com, 39. www.dpreview.com, 40. www.dpreview.com, 41. www.dpreview.com, 42. www.dpreview.com, 43. www.nikon.com, 44. www.imaging-resource.com, 45. www.dpreview.com, 46. www.dpreview.com, 47. www.dpreview.com, 48. www.dpreview.com, 49. www.dpreview.com, 50. www.dpreview.com, 51. www.dpreview.com, 52. www.imaging-resource.com, 53. www.imaging-resource.com, 54. www.nikon.com, 55. www.nikon.com, 56. www.nikon.com, 57. www.dpreview.com, 58. www.dpreview.com, 59. www.nikon.com, 60. www.nikon.com, 61. www.techradar.com, 62. www.techradar.com, 63. www.techradar.com, 64. www.nikon.com, 65. www.nikon.com, 66. www.nikon.com, 67. www.dpreview.com, 68. www.dpreview.com, 69. www.nikon.com, 70. www.nikon.com, 71. www.nikon.com, 72. www.nikon.com, 73. www.dpreview.com, 74. www.dpreview.com, 75. www.dpreview.com, 76. www.dpreview.com, 77. www.dpreview.com, 78. www.dpreview.com, 79. www.dpreview.com, 80. www.dpreview.com, 81. www.dpreview.com, 82. www.dpreview.com, 83. www.nikon.com, 84. www.dpreview.com, 85. www.dpreview.com, 86. www.dpreview.com, 87. www.dpreview.com, 88. www.dpreview.com, 89. www.dpreview.com, 90. www.dpreview.com, 91. www.dpreview.com, 92. www.dpreview.com, 93. www.techradar.com, 94. www.nikon.com, 95. www.nikon.com, 96. www.nikon.com, 97. www.nikon.com, 98. www.nikon.com, 99. www.nikon.com, 100. www.nikon.com, 101. www.imaging-resource.com, 102. www.dpreview.com, 103. www.dpreview.com, 104. www.dpreview.com, 105. www.dpreview.com, 106. www.nikon.com, 107. www.techradar.com, 108. silentpcreview.com, 109. www.dpreview.com, 110. www.dpreview.com, 111. www.dpreview.com, 112. www.theverge.com, 113. www.nikon.com, 114. www.nikon.com, 115. www.techradar.com, 116. www.dpreview.com, 117. www.nikon.com, 118. www.dpreview.com, 119. petapixel.com, 120. petapixel.com, 121. www.dpreview.com, 122. www.nikon.com, 123. www.nikon.com, 124. www.nikon.com, 125. www.nikon.com, 126. petapixel.com, 127. www.dpreview.com, 128. www.dpreview.com, 129. www.dpreview.com, 130. www.dpreview.com, 131. www.dpreview.com, 132. www.dpreview.com, 133. www.dpreview.com, 134. petapixel.com, 135. petapixel.com, 136. petapixel.com, 137. petapixel.com, 138. petapixel.com, 139. petapixel.com, 140. petapixel.com, 141. www.techradar.com, 142. www.techradar.com, 143. www.techradar.com, 144. www.techradar.com, 145. www.techradar.com, 146. www.techradar.com, 147. www.techradar.com, 148. www.theverge.com, 149. www.theverge.com, 150. www.theverge.com, 151. www.dpreview.com, 152. www.dpreview.com, 153. www.dpreview.com, 154. www.dpreview.com, 155. www.dpreview.com, 156. www.theverge.com, 157. www.dpreview.com, 158. www.dpreview.com, 159. www.dpreview.com, 160. www.dpreview.com, 161. www.dpreview.com, 162. www.dpreview.com, 163. www.dpreview.com, 164. www.imaging-resource.com, 165. www.dpreview.com, 166. www.dpreview.com, 167. www.dpreview.com, 168. www.nikon.com, 169. petapixel.com, 170. www.techradar.com, 171. www.dpreview.com, 172. www.dpreview.com, 173. www.dpreview.com, 174. www.nikon.com, 175. www.nikon.com, 176. www.nikon.com, 177. www.nikon.com, 178. www.dpreview.com, 179. www.nikon.com, 180. www.nikon.com, 181. www.dpreview.com, 182. www.dpreview.com, 183. www.dpreview.com, 184. www.dpreview.com, 185. www.dpreview.com, 186. www.dpreview.com, 187. www.dpreview.com, 188. www.nikon.com, 189. www.dpreview.com, 190. www.dpreview.com, 191. www.nikon.com, 192. www.dpreview.com, 193. www.nikon.com, 194. www.dpreview.com, 195. www.dpreview.com, 196. www.dpreview.com, 197. www.dpreview.com, 198. www.techradar.com, 199. www.techradar.com, 200. www.dpreview.com, 201. www.nikon.com, 202. www.techradar.com, 203. www.imaging-resource.com, 204. www.dpreview.com, 205. www.nikon.com, 206. www.nikon.com, 207. www.imaging-resource.com, 208. www.imaging-resource.com, 209. www.techradar.com, 210. www.techradar.com, 211. www.dpreview.com, 212. www.dpreview.com, 213. www.techradar.com, 214. www.nikon.com, 215. www.nikon.com, 216. www.dpreview.com, 217. www.dpreview.com, 218. www.dpreview.com, 219. www.imaging-resource.com, 220. www.dpreview.com, 221. www.nikon.com, 222. www.nikon.com, 223. www.nikon.com, 224. www.nikon.com, 225. www.nikon.com, 226. www.nikon.com, 227. www.nikon.com, 228. www.imaging-resource.com, 229. www.imaging-resource.com, 230. www.imaging-resource.com, 231. www.imaging-resource.com, 232. silentpcreview.com, 233. silentpcreview.com, 234. www.dpreview.com, 235. www.dpreview.com, 236. www.imaging-resource.com, 237. www.dpreview.com, 238. silentpcreview.com, 239. www.dpreview.com, 240. www.imaging-resource.com, 241. www.imaging-resource.com, 242. www.dpreview.com, 243. www.dpreview.com, 244. www.dpreview.com, 245. www.dpreview.com, 246. www.dpreview.com, 247. www.dpreview.com, 248. www.nikon.com, 249. www.dpreview.com, 250. www.dpreview.com, 251. www.dpreview.com, 252. www.dpreview.com, 253. www.dpreview.com, 254. www.dpreview.com, 255. www.dpreview.com, 256. www.dpreview.com, 257. www.dpreview.com, 258. www.dpreview.com, 259. www.dpreview.com, 260. www.dpreview.com, 261. www.dpreview.com, 262. www.dpreview.com, 263. www.dpreview.com, 264. www.nikon.com, 265. www.imaging-resource.com, 266. www.dpreview.com, 267. www.dpreview.com, 268. www.dpreview.com, 269. www.dpreview.com, 270. www.dpreview.com, 271. www.dpreview.com, 272. www.dpreview.com, 273. www.dpreview.com, 274. www.dpreview.com, 275. www.dpreview.com, 276. www.dpreview.com, 277. www.dpreview.com, 278. www.dpreview.com, 279. www.dpreview.com, 280. www.dpreview.com, 281. www.dpreview.com, 282. www.dpreview.com, 283. www.dpreview.com, 284. www.dpreview.com, 285. bcgforums.com, 286. www.dpreview.com, 287. www.dpreview.com, 288. www.nikon.com, 289. www.dpreview.com, 290. www.dpreview.com, 291. www.dpreview.com, 292. www.dpreview.com, 293. www.dpreview.com, 294. www.dpreview.com, 295. www.dpreview.com, 296. www.dpreview.com, 297. www.dpreview.com, 298. www.dpreview.com, 299. www.dpreview.com, 300. www.dpreview.com, 301. www.dpreview.com, 302. www.dpreview.com, 303. www.dpreview.com, 304. www.dpreview.com, 305. www.dpreview.com, 306. www.dpreview.com, 307. www.dpreview.com, 308. www.dpreview.com, 309. www.imaging-resource.com, 310. www.imaging-resource.com, 311. www.imaging-resource.com, 312. www.imaging-resource.com, 313. www.imaging-resource.com, 314. www.imaging-resource.com, 315. www.imaging-resource.com, 316. www.imaging-resource.com, 317. www.imaging-resource.com, 318. www.dpreview.com, 319. www.imaging-resource.com, 320. www.imaging-resource.com, 321. www.dpreview.com, 322. www.dpreview.com, 323. www.dpreview.com, 324. www.dpreview.com, 325. www.techradar.com, 326. silentpcreview.com, 327. www.imaging-resource.com, 328. www.nikon.com, 329. www.nikon.com, 330. www.dpreview.com, 331. www.dpreview.com, 332. www.dpreview.com, 333. www.techradar.com, 334. www.techradar.com, 335. www.theverge.com, 336. www.theverge.com, 337. www.imaging-resource.com, 338. www.imaging-resource.com, 339. www.dpreview.com, 340. www.dpreview.com, 341. www.dpreview.com