Samsung’s “Project Moohan” XR Headset: A Cheaper Vision Pro Rival Set to Disrupt AR/VR in 2025

Key Facts:

• Samsung’s First XR Headset: Project Moohan is the codename for Samsung’s first standalone extended reality (XR) headset, developed in partnership with Google and Qualcomm ^{[1] [2]}. It combines augmented, virtual, and mixed reality in one device – Samsung’s answer to Apple’s Vision Pro and Meta’s Quest series ^{[3] [4]}.
• Launch Timeline: Samsung confirmed the headset will launch in late 2025 (H2 2025) ^[5]. Leaks point to an unveiling at a special Unpacked event on September 29, 2025, with sales starting October 13 in South Korea ^[6]. Broader global rollout is expected thereafter.
• Pricing Position: While not officially announced, reports suggest Moohan will be significantly cheaper than Apple’s $3,499 Vision Pro, but far pricier than a $500 Meta Quest 3. Leaked Korean pricing of 2.5–4 million won (~$1,790–$2,765 USD) ^{[7] [8]} puts Moohan in a mid-premium tier, aiming to balance high-end features with a lower barrier than Apple’s offering.
• High-End Specs: Project Moohan is rumored to feature dual 4K micro-OLED displays (likely from Sony) for pin-sharp visuals ^{[9] [10]}. It’s powered by Qualcomm’s latest Snapdragon XR2+ Gen 2 chipset optimized for XR, paired with 16GB of RAM for robust performance ^{[11] [12]}. Reviewers who tested prototypes report a lightweight, well-balanced design with a comfortable fit (dial-adjust headstrap, no top strap) and removable light seals for adjustable immersion ^{[13] [14]}.
• XR Platform & AI: Moohan runs on Android XR, Google’s new headset operating system, meaning it can tap into the vast Android app ecosystem via the Play Store ^[15]. Crucially, it integrates Google’s “Gemini” AI assistant at its core – enabling natural voice controls and on-the-fly contextual information about your surroundings ^{[16] [17]}. Samsung touts multimodal input: intuitive hand- and eye-tracking, voice commands, and even a side touchpad, with optional controllers for traditional VR gaming ^{[18] [19]}.
• Target Use Cases: Samsung is positioning Project Moohan for both productivity and immersive entertainment. The headset is pitched as a “spatial canvas” for work collaboration, 3D design, and training simulations (an area Samsung is already piloting with partners in Korea) ^[20], while also enabling high-quality media consumption, XR gaming, and virtual meetings for consumers ^{[21] [22]}. Samsung’s strong enterprise ecosystem (5G, industrial partnerships) suggests a significant B2B focus alongside the enthusiast consumer market ^{[23] [24]}.
• Competitive Stakes: As an Android-powered “Vision Pro rival”, Moohan is entering a hot XR market. It directly challenges Apple’s premium Vision Pro in capability (micro-OLED visuals, rich sensors) but at a lower price, and aims to outdo Meta’s upcoming Quest 3 in display quality and AI smarts while justifying a higher cost ^{[25] [26]}. Samsung sees this device as a “key stepping stone” in its tech portfolio, expanding the Galaxy ecosystem into XR ^[27].

Project Moohan: Samsung’s XR Reboot with Google & Qualcomm

Samsung’s Project Moohan represents the company’s grand return to immersive tech, marking its first standalone XR headset after years of quiet. Back in the mid-2010s, Samsung dabbled in VR with the Gear VR smartphone headset, but those early efforts fizzled out. Now, spurred by a surge of industry interest in “mixed reality,” Samsung is re-entering the fray with a much more ambitious device developed hand-in-hand with Google and Qualcomm ^[28]. This cross-industry collaboration was first teased in early 2023 and formally announced in December 2024, when Samsung revealed it was building an “Android XR” platform in partnership with those tech giants ^{[29] [30]}.

Project Moohan (a codename meaning “infinity” in Korean) embodies Samsung’s belief in “delivering unparalleled, immersive experiences within an infinite space” ^[31]. Unlike Samsung’s older phone-based VR gear, Moohan is a fully self-contained XR system – untethered, with its own displays and processor. It’s designed to merge physical and digital worlds, aligning with Samsung’s vision that XR will “unlock unprecedented experiences” across work, learning, entertainment, and more ^{[32] [33]}. The company explicitly calls this project one of its “most ambitious endeavors yet,” seeing XR as a new computing platform it cannot afford to miss ^[34].

Official statements highlight the strategic importance. Samsung executive Won-Joon Choi (Head of R&D for Mobile eXperience) stated that with Moohan, Samsung is “excited to collaborate with Google to reshape the future of XR,” leveraging multimodal AI to enable “the most natural and intuitive interactions” in an XR environment ^[35]. Google’s Sameer Samat, Android Ecosystem President, echoed that sentiment, calling this an “inflection point” where advances in AI make new XR experiences possible, and expressing Google’s thrill to “build a new ecosystem with Android XR” on devices like Samsung’s headset ^[36]. In Samsung’s Q2 2025 earnings call, the company reassured investors that Project Moohan remains on track, describing it as a product that “seamlessly integrates the XR ecosystem developed in partnership with Google as well as multimodal AI”, and a key step in solidifying Samsung’s leadership in future technologies ^[37].

In short, Project Moohan is not a mere gadget launch for Samsung – it’s a platform play. By partnering with Google (for software and services) and Qualcomm (for silicon), Samsung aims to establish an Android-driven XR ecosystem to compete head-on with Apple’s tightly-integrated visionOS (Vision Pro) and Meta’s proprietary VR platform. This collaborative approach should give Moohan a robust foundation of apps and developer support out of the gate, leveraging familiar Android tools and Google’s app suite. As we’ll see, the headset’s hardware and software are both cutting-edge, intended to showcase the best of what the Android XR platform can offer.

Features and Hardware: High-End Displays, Premium Build, Comfortable Design

Though still under wraps officially, Project Moohan’s hardware specs have leaked through benchmark tests and hands-on demos, painting a picture of a premium XR device on par with the best in the industry. Here’s what we know about Moohan’s key features and design:

• Advanced XR Visuals: Samsung is equipping Moohan with “state-of-the-art displays” – reportedly dual 4K micro-OLED panels providing a super-dense image ^{[38] [39]}. In fact, one leak claims the headset achieves about 3,000 DPI (dots per inch) pixel density, far exceeding the Meta Quest 3’s ~1,200 DPI LCD screens ^[40]. Early testers describe the visuals as vibrant and crystal clear, with a wide color gamut (96% DCI-P3) and up to 1,000 nits brightness in AR passthrough mode ^[41]. The displays are expected to run at 90 Hz refresh (on par with Vision Pro’s default 90Hz) for smooth motion ^[42]. These specs suggest Samsung is aiming for a “no-compromise” visual experience: text and 3D content should appear sharp with minimal screen-door effect, making Moohan suitable for reading, detailed design work, and immersive video.
• Snapdragon XR2+ Gen 2 Chipset: Under the hood, Moohan runs on Qualcomm’s latest XR-optimized processor – the Snapdragon XR2+ Gen 2 ^[43]. This is a cutting-edge mobile SoC purpose-built for AR/VR, offering a significant performance boost over the previous-gen XR chips (the “Plus Gen 2” is reportedly ~20% faster CPU and 15% faster GPU than its predecessor) ^[44]. The XR2 Gen2 also includes an Adreno 740 GPU, which is optimized for high-refresh 3D graphics and spatial computing tasks ^[45]. In Geekbench tests, the alleged Moohan prototype scored ~990 single-core and ~2453 multi-core, indicating performance comparable to high-end smartphones ^[46]. Backing the chip is 16 GB of RAM, which matches Apple’s Vision Pro memory and doubles the Quest 3’s 8 GB ^{[47] [48]}. This generous RAM should help with multitasking multiple virtual apps and powering the on-board AI assistant. Overall, the XR2 Gen2 + 16GB combo positions Moohan as a powerful XR machine capable of rich visuals and AI without a tethered PC.
• Mixed Reality Cameras & Sensors: As an XR device, Moohan is laden with cameras and sensors for environmental awareness. Samsung hasn’t published the exact sensor suite yet, but we can expect a similar array to its peers: high-resolution passthrough cameras for mixed reality, inside-out tracking cameras (likely four+ cameras to track hand movements and spatial position), eye-tracking cameras inside the goggles, and possibly depth sensors. A tester from Android Central noted Moohan’s full-color passthrough feed was “vibrant and clear,” allowing them to see people around them while virtual windows floated in the space ^[49]. The headset defaults to MR mode where the real world is visible in color, and seamlessly blends in digital content. Eye-tracking is confirmed, as users at demos could navigate by gazing at UI elements and then pinching to select ^[50]. We also know Moohan will support hand-tracking out of the box – the primary interaction method is using your hands (pinch, grab, etc.) similar to Vision Pro and Quest, enabled by multiple cameras watching your hands ^[51]. Samsung is even including downward-facing cameras to better capture hand gestures naturally resting below your line of sight ^[52]. Combined with infrared sensors for eye tracking and possibly facial expression tracking, Moohan should offer a fully tracked XR experience with no external base stations needed.
• External Battery Pack for Comfort: To keep the headset light on the face, Samsung has adopted the external battery pack approach. Like Apple’s Vision Pro (which has a waist-clipped battery), Moohan’s battery is a separate pack that connects via a cable to the headset ^[53]. Early users reported sliding a power brick into their pocket attached by cable to the headset’s side ^[54]. This means the headset itself can be lighter since it isn’t carrying heavy batteries on the brow. One advantage Moohan may have: its battery cable uses a standard connector compatible with any power bank, offering flexibility to swap or use higher-capacity packs ^[55]. (By contrast, Apple uses a proprietary magnet cable for its battery.) The external battery design suggests Moohan will have a limited battery life (likely around 2 hours per pack, similar to Vision Pro’s 2 hours), but users can extend usage by carrying spares or plugging into power when needed. The trade-off is well worth it for comfort – distributing weight off the headset helps avoid the front-heavy fatigue common in all-in-one VR devices.
• Ergonomics and Build: Samsung appears to have focused heavily on comfort and ergonomics in Moohan’s design. The headset features a rigid headband with a rear adjustment dial (“twisty knob”) to tighten or loosen the fit ^[56]. Testers describe the strap as surprisingly comfortable and form-fitting, even without a top head strap, and note that the weight distribution feels balanced so that “the weight of the device didn’t stand out” during extended wear ^[57]. Notably, one journalist spent 30 minutes with Moohan and did not experience the dreaded “hot face” or significant pressure on the cheeks that often plagues heavy headsets ^[58]. This suggests good ventilation and perhaps lighter materials. Indeed, Moohan is reportedly lighter than Apple’s ~600 gram Vision Pro ^[59], which if true would be a big win for comfort (the Vision Pro’s heft is one of its criticisms). The front of Moohan has a sleek curved visor akin to Vision Pro’s look ^[60], but Samsung added a large upper “hood” or visor that blocks light from above, plus an optional lower face seal that attaches magnetically to block out peripheral light ^{[61] [62]}. These detachable light shields let users choose between full immersion or keeping some awareness of the physical surroundings ^[63]. The right side of the headset also sports a touchpad surface built into the strap ^[64], providing another input method (useful for quick actions like adjusting volume or scrolling menus by swiping on the temple area). In terms of build quality, Samsung is likely using a mix of soft plastic, fabric, and metallic accents similar to Apple’s premium design ^{[65] [66]}. The overall aesthetic “bears a striking resemblance to the Apple Vision Pro” at first glance ^[67] – not a coincidence, as Samsung seems to be benchmarking against Apple’s design excellence while adding its own twists for practicality.
• Optional Controllers: Unlike Apple, which forgoes physical controllers entirely, Samsung will offer VR controllers as an optional input for Moohan ^[68]. The company hasn’t publicly shown these yet, but leaks suggest they exist. This is likely to appeal to the gaming use-case and to ensure compatibility with existing VR apps that assume joystick controllers. The controllers could be similar to Meta’s – i.e. wireless handheld controllers with tracking – or something new. A rumor mentions Samsung developing “in-house controllers” possibly nicknamed “Galaxy Rings”, but those details remain speculative. Regardless, Moohan’s primary design philosophy is controller-free (just hands, voice, eyes), with controllers as a fallback for those who need them ^[69]. This approach hedges Samsung’s bets: it embraces the futurist, intuitive interaction model like Vision Pro, but also acknowledges the existing VR content that works best with controller input (such as complex games).

In sum, Project Moohan’s hardware stack suggests a premium XR headset engineered for high fidelity and comfort. Samsung is pulling out all the stops with 4K-class optics, a top-tier XR processor, and thoughtful ergonomic touches (balanced weight, modular light blockers, external power). The device clearly draws inspiration from Apple’s Vision Pro in form and function, yet differentiates in some areas (no outward eye display, built-in touchpad, support for controllers). Next, we’ll look at the software and AI side – which may be Moohan’s true secret sauce.

Software & AI: Android XR Platform with “Gemini” Assistant – A Smarter Spatial Experience

One of Project Moohan’s biggest selling points is its tight integration with Google’s Android XR software and the new Gemini AI platform. Unlike Apple’s closed ecosystem approach, Samsung is leaning on Android’s openness and Google’s AI prowess to build a rich XR experience. Here’s how the software and AI ecosystem for Moohan is shaping up:

• Android XR Operating System: Project Moohan runs on an Android-based OS specifically built for XR headsets ^{[70] [71]}. Google has extended the Android platform (familiar from billions of phones) into a version optimized for spatial computing. For users, this means Moohan should have out-of-the-box access to a huge library of Android apps via the Google Play Store ^[72]. Indeed, Samsung insiders have hinted that “compatibility with Google Play Store is a given,” allowing standard 2D Android apps to run in Moohan’s virtual environment as floating windows ^[73]. During Google I/O 2025 demos, Moohan was shown running core Google apps like Chrome, YouTube, Google Photos, and Google Maps in an XR interface ^[74]. This immediate app library is a major advantage – where Apple’s visionOS is launching with a few thousand iPad ported apps and requires developers to create bespoke “spatial” apps, Moohan can leverage millions of existing Android apps (even if they run as flat screens in VR at first). Samsung and Google are also courting developers to create special “Spatial” apps that take full advantage of mixed reality ^[75]. Thanks to Unity engine support and Android’s huge dev community, porting VR games and MR experiences from other platforms (like Meta’s Quest) to Android XR should be relatively straightforward ^[76]. Essentially, Samsung’s strategy is to piggyback on the ubiquity of Android – providing familiarity for developers and a content head-start – to bootstrap its XR ecosystem.
• Gemini: AI Assistant and Multimodal Interface: The real differentiator Samsung is pushing is deep AI integration via Google’s Gemini. Gemini is Google’s next-generation AI (a multimodal model that can process text, images, and more), and in Moohan it acts as an ever-present voice assistant and intelligent agent. This goes far beyond Siri’s limited role on Vision Pro. With Gemini, Moohan offers a conversational UI: you can control the headset or retrieve information by simply talking naturally ^[77]. For example, a user wearing Moohan could look at a landmark through the passthrough view and ask, “Hey, what is that building?” – Gemini can “see” through the cameras and recognize the real-world object, then overlay information about it ^{[78] [79]}. In a demo, a reporter in a virtual Google Maps scene asked the AI, “How many people have climbed El Capitan?” and Gemini responded contextually with facts about the Yosemite cliff ^[80]. This multimodal understanding – seeing and hearing the environment – allows for on-the-fly AR interactions that feel like magical AR search. There’s even a “Circle to Search” gesture: draw a circle in the air around an object you see, and Gemini will identify it or pull up related info ^[81]. Samsung describes Gemini as providing “contextual understanding of the world around you” and being a “helpful AI assistant” across all XR interactions ^[82]. Gemini also helps with interface navigation. Instead of fiddling with menus or app grids, users can simply ask Gemini to open apps or perform tasks. The Android Central tester noted that Samsung/Google expect you to let “Gemini do the work of opening and navigating apps for you” via voice commands ^{[83] [84]}. For instance, you could say “Open YouTube and play a nature video,” and the headset will comply. During media playback, Gemini can even enhance content – one demo showed a standard 2D video being “upscaled” with AI-generated 3D depth effects to make it more immersive in the headset ^[85]. All of this happens on-device thanks to the Snapdragon XR2’s AI cores, meaning Gemini can respond quickly without always relying on cloud processing ^[86]. (Notably, in Google’s earlier smart glasses prototypes, Assistant queries had to be sent to your phone; in Moohan, Gemini runs locally for faster, more integrated responses ^[87].)
• Natural Inputs and Multitasking: Android XR is built for multi-modal input, which means Moohan doesn’t force you into one control scheme. You can use hand gestures (pinch to click, grab and drag windows, etc.), eye gaze (simply look at a UI element to focus it), and voice commands, all in tandem. Moohan also includes that side touchpad as a tactile input if needed ^[88]. This flexibility is an intentional contrast to Apple’s approach: Vision Pro heavily emphasizes eye-tracking + pinch, with voice mainly for dictation. Samsung’s system “leans into voice control as its primary interface, thanks to deep Gemini integration” while still retaining support for eyes, hands, and peripherals much like Apple’s method ^[89]. In practice, this multimodal design could make Moohan more accessible – users can choose the interaction mode that’s most intuitive for them or even combine them (for example, gaze at an icon, then say “open settings” instead of pinching). Eye-tracking on Moohan is said to be quick to calibrate and very accurate, comparable to Vision Pro’s (one tester found no noticeable difference in eye-track accuracy between them) ^[90]. Hand tracking has been praised as “seamless” – inputs were rarely missed and virtual hand models lined up well with the user’s real hand positions ^[91]. Moohan also offers ray-casting (pointing your index finger to direct a cursor), which interestingly is a feature Apple hides in accessibility settings but Samsung enables by default ^[92]. And of course, for complex interactions or gaming, Bluetooth controllers can be paired. Android XR’s interface is designed for multitasking in 3D space. Apps open as resizable floating windows in your view. You can have multiple apps up at once – e.g. a Chrome browser, a chat window, a floating video – and arrange them around you in a virtual workspace. In demos, tapping an “expand” button on a YouTube window would curve it into a large theater screen and spawn additional info panels alongside ^[93]. This kind of dynamic layout shows the influence of decades of Android UX, now adapted to infinite canvas of AR. Thanks to 16GB RAM and a capable chip, Moohan should handle several apps simultaneously without freezing. Google is also optimizing its own apps for XR; testers remarked that apps like Google Maps in Android XR felt well-optimized for the spatial format, which will be critical for user adoption ^{[94] [95]}.
• Content and Ecosystem: Samsung knows that hardware means little without compelling content. By building on Android, Moohan will launch with a vast ecosystem of familiar apps (even if not all are 3D-optimized). It also inherits Google’s services, which cover a lot of ground: YouTube for 360° videos, Stadia (though now defunct) or other cloud gaming for entertainment, Google Meet for virtual meetings, etc. Samsung is likely to layer its own Galaxy ecosystem perks as well – perhaps integrating Galaxy smartphones, tablets, or wearables with the headset for notifications or seamless data syncing (similar to how Apple devices hand off content to Vision Pro). Moreover, Qualcomm’s involvement suggests Moohan will support frameworks like OpenXR, making it easier for cross-platform XR apps to run. One potential challenge is social and gaming content: Meta’s Quest headsets enjoy a large library of VR games (including exclusives) and a built-in social VR platform (Horizon Worlds). Samsung and Google will need to entice developers to port popular VR titles to Android XR and maybe develop their own social/Metaverse experiences to compete. The good news is Unity and Unreal Engine both support Android, and Google has hinted at big gaming pushes for Android XR (even partnering with Niantic on AR gaming concepts) ^[96]. As XR Today noted, Samsung will need “compelling exclusive content to truly compete with Meta’s established Horizon ecosystem,” but the open Android platform should lower the barrier for third-party developers to bring apps over ^[97].

In summary, Samsung’s software strategy with Moohan is about leveraging openness and AI intelligence. By using Android XR, they immediately gain a wide app ecosystem and familiarity for users/devs. By baking in Gemini AI, they add a futuristic, user-friendly layer on top that could make the XR experience feel more like interacting with a helpful guide than fiddling with a computer. Expert reviewers have speculated that Samsung’s emphasis on AI and multi-input could make Moohan “more transformative in the long run,” potentially creating an XR platform that’s more accessible and adaptable than Apple’s approach ^[98]. The true test will be whether this software delivers a “natural and indispensable” feel in daily use – something XR devices have long struggled with ^[99]. If Samsung and Google can nail it, Moohan might turn XR from a neat tech demo into a practical tool.

Target Audience and Use Cases: From Enterprise Training to Living Room Entertainment

Who is Samsung building Project Moohan for? The answer appears to be a blend of enterprise customers and tech-savvy consumers, with a strategy to cover both productivity and play:

• Enterprise & Professional Use: Samsung is uniquely well-positioned to push XR in the enterprise sector. The company has already been working with businesses and government in South Korea on XR pilots – e.g. using AR/VR for power plant digital twins, water infrastructure simulations, and medical training ^{[100] [101]}. Project Moohan will likely be marketed as a tool for workplace collaboration, design, and training. Its high price (relative to consumer gadgets) and advanced features make it suitable for corporate budgets. Samsung’s XR Today analysis emphasizes the B2B advantage: Samsung can leverage its existing relationships in industries (engineering, healthcare, defense, etc.) and its 5G network solutions to integrate Moohan into enterprise workflows ^{[102] [103]}. For example, a factory could use Moohan for remote assistance (experts guiding on-site workers via AR), or an architecture firm could have clients walkthrough 1:1 scale virtual building models. The Gemini AI could also be a selling point in enterprise, enabling hands-free access to information or guided procedures in industrial settings. By positioning Moohan as a scalable, secure platform (Android’s managed configurations could help IT departments deploy them), Samsung is clearly aiming to make XR a “necessity in the workplace” rather than a niche toy ^[104]. In fact, observers suggest the launch of Moohan could be a tipping point where XR starts becoming mainstream for business if executed well ^[105].
• High-End Consumers & Creators: On the consumer side, Moohan targets early adopters, tech enthusiasts, and professionals who might also consider Apple’s Vision Pro. Think of freelance designers, VR content creators, gamers with disposable income, or even luxury tech consumers – those who crave the latest and greatest in tech and are willing to spend $1–2k on an immersive device. For this crowd, Moohan promises some of the “magic” of Vision Pro at a lower cost. Use cases include enjoying 3D movies on a giant virtual screen, playing immersive AR games in one’s living room, engaging in virtual meetings or social hangouts, and multi-tasking with virtual monitors for productivity. Samsung explicitly highlighted scenarios like holographic collaboration, immersive design reviews, and digital twin visualizations for business, as well as gaming, hybrid meetings, and entertainment for consumers – “blurring the lines between digital and physical spaces” in daily life ^{[106] [107]}. The device could appeal to those who work from home and want a multi-monitor setup without buying physical screens, or to 3D artists who can use spatial computing to create and manipulate models naturally in space. Samsung’s own demo had users planning a trip with Google Maps in AR, watching sports on YouTube, and working with office apps – indicating a broad consumer productivity angle too ^[108].
• Education and Training: Another audience is educational institutions and training programs. With XR, Samsung can tap into schools, universities, and vocational training centers that are increasingly looking at VR/AR for immersive learning. A headset like Moohan could enable virtual lab experiments, historical site tours in AR, medical anatomy training with holograms, etc. Gemini’s conversational ability might act as a tutor in such scenarios. Given Samsung’s global reach, they could partner with educational content providers to push Moohan into classrooms or corporate training departments, especially in Asia where Samsung has strong presence.
• Developers and XR Enthusiasts: One shouldn’t overlook that Moohan will initially attract the XR enthusiast community and developers who want an Android-based device to build content for. Many AR/VR devs who haven’t had access to Vision Pro (which in 2024–25 is limited and pricey) might adopt Moohan as a more open platform to experiment with spatial computing apps, given that it supports familiar Android frameworks and likely Unity/Unreal. If Samsung can get units into the hands of developers early (perhaps via beta programs or enterprise loans), it could foster a grassroots ecosystem of apps that further broaden the headset’s appeal.
• Geographic Focus: Samsung’s initial launch in South Korea (mid-October 2025) suggests they will first target their home market and maybe a few key markets in Asia ^[109]. South Korea’s tech-savvy consumers and businesses make a good testbed. After that, likely targets for 2026 rollout would include the U.S., Europe, and other parts of Asia. Samsung might prioritize regions where they already have strong smartphone marketshare and carrier partnerships (since XR could potentially be sold via carriers with 5G plans). The competitive landscape also influences this: Apple Vision Pro’s first release is U.S.-only, so Samsung might try to quickly release in other countries to become the de facto premium XR option where Apple isn’t present yet.

In essence, Samsung is casting a wide net: enterprise and advanced consumers are the primary targets. They are positioning Moohan as both a productivity workhorse and a deluxe entertainment device – a strategy similar to Apple’s pitch for Vision Pro as a “digital life” device for work and play. The difference is Samsung can lean on its enterprise credibility (think of all the industries using Samsung displays, devices, Knox security, etc.) to push Moohan as an enterprise tool from day one, rather than an afterthought. If successful, Project Moohan could help dissolve the notion that XR is only for gaming or novelty; it could prove its value in daily professional workflows and high-end consumer media consumption alike, bridging a gap between the mass-market fun of Meta’s Quest and the ultra-premium professional focus of Apple’s Vision Pro.

Launch Timing and Pricing Expectations

Samsung has been deliberately vague about Project Moohan’s release date, saying only that it would arrive “before the end of 2025.” But leaks and recent reports have zeroed in on a concrete timeline: late Q3 2025 for the big reveal. According to a reputable Korean news leak (relayed via GSMArena and TechRadar), Samsung is planning a dedicated Galaxy Unpacked event on September 29, 2025 to unveil the XR headset ^[110]. This would be Samsung’s third Unpacked of the year (after the usual spring Galaxy S launch and summer Galaxy Z Fold/Flip launch), underlining how significant Moohan is to warrant its own stage. If this date holds, it means Samsung will publicly show Moohan and announce its official name (since “Project Moohan” is just a codename) at that event. The same leak suggests sales would begin by October 13, 2025 in South Korea, likely with pre-orders shortly after the announcement ^[111]. Samsung’s confirmation in an earnings call that the headset is on track for H2 2025 aligns perfectly with a late September launch event ^[112].

After debuting in Korea, Samsung is expected to roll out Moohan to other markets in a phased manner. Industry rumors point to a staggered international release: possibly North America and select European/Asian markets by Q4 2025 or early 2026 ^[113]. This mirrors how other advanced Samsung devices (like foldable phones) initially launched in limited regions before expanding. By launching in Korea first, Samsung can control supply and gauge reaction in a market that is both very receptive to new tech and home turf for easier distribution. It also gives developers some lead time (Samsung and Google released an Android XR developer preview in mid-2025 ^[114]) to have apps ready by the time the device hits Western markets.

How much will Project Moohan cost?

Pricing is one of the most anticipated (and debated) aspects of Moohan. Samsung has to strike a balance: undercut Apple enough to seem like a bargain, yet not sacrifice the premium aura (or incur huge losses) by going too low. While Samsung hasn’t announced a price, several clues have emerged:

• A Korean source leaked an internal target price range of ₩2.5 – 4 million. That translates roughly to $1,800 – $2,765 USD (or £1,330 – £2,045 in the UK) depending on configuration ^{[115] [116]}. Observers believe Samsung won’t do a direct currency conversion for other markets, but this at least pegs Moohan’s starting price around $1.8K. For context, that’s half or less of Apple Vision Pro’s $3,499 price, which makes Moohan sound relatively affordable – but it’s still 3–4 times the cost of a $499 Meta Quest 3. XR Today noted this positioning is a “middle ground: powerful enough to rival Apple’s ‘spatial computer’ but more accessible” to buyers who balk at $3,500 ^{[117] [118]}.
• Another report (from Samsung’s local channels) speculated Moohan could be priced around $1,000 for base model ^[119]. This figure, cited by XR Today’s August 5 piece, seems quite optimistic and perhaps reflects a strategic wish rather than reality. At $999, Samsung would dramatically undercut Apple and even approach console-like pricing – however, given the bill of materials (expensive micro-OLED screens, custom silicon, etc.), $999 might be unrealistically low. It’s possible Samsung considered a aggressive subsidized pricing model (the XR Today author suggested Samsung might sell Moohan at a loss to gain market, analogous to how gaming consoles are sometimes sold) ^[120]. But historically, Samsung doesn’t heavily subsidize first-gen flagship gadgets; they price them premium and maybe lower cost in subsequent generations.
• Most industry watchers expect a price “between the two” rivals – i.e. clearly above Quest 3 and below Vision Pro. The Hindustan Times tech column put it plainly: since Vision Pro is $3499 and Quest 3 is $499, “it will be interesting to see where Samsung positions Moohan… It is expected to cost somewhere between the two” ^[121]. Even Samsung’s own statements call Moohan a “premium product” with advanced AI features ^[122], so it won’t be cheap. A safe prediction for the base model would be in the $1,500–$2,000 range (perhaps $1,499 or $1,599 to undercut the psychological $1,799 Apple’s next-gen or $1,999 if they include more in box). There might be multiple SKUs – for example, different storage options (Apple’s Vision Pro base is 256GB, rumored 512GB/1TB options cost more). If Samsung follows suit, a higher storage Moohan could push toward that ₩4M (~$2.7K) upper leak range.
• Included accessories could also affect pricing perception. Will Samsung include the battery pack(s) and any controllers in the box? The leak of a ₩2.5M “starting price” suggests that’s for the base headset and one battery. XR headsets like Meta’s are sold with controllers included; Apple does not include any controllers (since none exist) but does include things like a light seal and two-hour battery. Samsung may bundle a pair of controllers only with a higher trim package or sell them separately (to keep the base cost lower). It might also offer an enterprise bundle with additional straps or support contracts.

In any case, Samsung’s clear goal is to be cheaper than Apple Vision Pro to attract those interested in the concept but deterred by the $3500 tag. A Samsung executive even hinted at this, noting that while Moohan is a “premium productivity headset” like Vision Pro, Samsung will “try to undercut Apple’s $3,500 price” – though it’ll still “cost much more than a Quest” headset ^{[123] [124]}. This implies Samsung knows price is a key differentiator against Apple, but they are comfortable being a higher-end, niche product above the mass-market Quest line.

It’s also worth noting that pricing strategy could evolve. If Apple faces delays or limited early adoption due to high cost, Samsung might be emboldened to charge more (closer to $2K). Conversely, if Apple somehow lowers prices in future or Meta’s consumer mindshare grows, Samsung might adjust Moohan’s price or offer promotions (Samsung often uses pre-order deals, trade-ins, or bundles to add value without cutting list price).

Finally, Samsung might frame Moohan’s cost in monthly terms via carrier/device financing. For instance, $1,800 translates to about $50/month over 36 months, which could be marketed like a smartphone installment – making it psychologically easier for early adopters to bite. The inclusion of 5G connectivity hasn’t been mentioned (likely it’s Wi-Fi only, unlike, say, some AR glasses that have 5G), so carrier tie-ins may be limited, but Samsung has a way of getting even Wi-Fi devices sold through telecom channels with financing.

Bottom line: Expect Project Moohan to launch as a premium-priced XR headset in late 2025, probably around $1,500–$2,000 USD (give or take), which dramatically undercuts Apple’s Vision Pro while signaling a more premium experience than the $500–$600 standalone VR headsets out there. Samsung is likely to officially confirm the price and exact release dates at the anticipated Unpacked event. All eyes will then be on whether the device can justify its cost – which will depend on the comparative value it offers versus the competition. On that note, let’s compare Project Moohan head-to-head with its major rivals in the XR space.

Project Moohan vs. Apple Vision Pro: Can Samsung Beat the “Spatial Computer”?

Apple’s Vision Pro is the elephant in the XR room – a trailblazing device that arguably kicked off this new wave of XR hype when unveiled in mid-2023. Samsung’s Moohan has inevitably drawn comparisons to the Vision Pro, with many dubbing it an “Android alternative” or “Vision Pro rival.” Let’s break down how they stack up on key fronts:

● Design and Comfort: Both headsets feature a front visor with see-through AR capabilities, but their design philosophies differ. The Vision Pro exudes Apple’s signature luxury: a sleek curved glass front, aluminum alloy frame, and a comfortable knitted headband with a top strap ^{[125] [126]}. It looks like a pair of ski goggles crossed with high-end audio headphones, even displaying the user’s eyes on the outside via the unique EyeSight OLED panel (to keep the wearer connected with people around them). Project Moohan, while similar in overall shape (even Samsung admits it “bears a striking resemblance” to Vision Pro’s design) ^[127], forgoes any external eye display – Moohan does not show the user’s eyes on the outside ^[128]. Instead, Samsung prioritized practical elements like a larger hood to block external light and modular light seals (top and bottom) to allow either full immersion or peripheral vision as needed ^[129].

When it comes to comfort, early reports actually give Moohan an edge: testers found Moohan’s rigid strap with dial prevented front-heavy drag and avoided the “hot face” issue after 30 minutes, whereas Vision Pro, despite its superb materials, felt noticeably heavy and warm on the face after similar use ^{[130] [131]}. Apple’s device weighs around 600 grams (not including its tethered battery) ^[132], while Samsung’s is reportedly lighter (exact weight unknown, but perhaps under 500g) ^[133]. Both use an external battery pack to offload weight; however, Vision Pro’s battery attaches via a short cable and only Apple’s pack can be used, whereas Moohan’s cable can plug into any USB-C power bank for flexibility ^[134]. Apple’s strap is adjustable via interchangeable sizes and a top strap, whereas Samsung’s is one-size-fits-all with a ratchet knob and no top strap. Ultimately, both aim for comfort during extended wear, but Samsung’s approach might suit those who dislike the snug, fabric fit of Apple’s – Moohan is a bit more like a traditional VR headset fit, but done in a refined way.

● Display Quality: Both headsets tout ultra-high-resolution micro-OLED displays. Apple hasn’t published exact per-eye resolution, but they advertise 23 million pixels across both eyes – roughly equivalent to two 4K (or slightly higher than 4K) screens, which matches the ~~3,400 x 3,000 per eye ballpark. Samsung’s Moohan is also using dual 4K-class OLEDs (the leak said 3,552 × 3,840 per eye) ^[135], so in pure resolution they are likely very close. In practice, reviewers who tried both said the sharpness and visual fidelity were nearly indistinguishable between Moohan and Vision Pro ^[136]. Text is crisp, images are lifelike on both. Apple might have a slight edge in custom optics (they use a complex three-element lens for wide field of view and clarity), whereas Samsung uses pancake lenses (per reports) which are also high quality but potentially yield a slightly smaller field of view than Vision Pro ^[137]. Jason Howell noted Moohan’s FOV felt a bit smaller than Vision Pro’s, though without exact numbers it’s anecdotal ^[138]. Both run at around 90 Hz refresh, though Apple can variably adjust (and go to 96 Hz for video content). One area where Moohan might surpass Vision Pro is pixels-per-inch: that 3,000 DPI claim indicates extremely fine pixel density, whereas Vision Pro’s DPI is around 3400×3000 over maybe ~1.1 inch panels, likely in the 2500 DPI range (still incredible). Also, Moohan’s displays were rumored to hit 1000 nits brightness (though likely only a fraction of that used sustained for AR) ^[139] – similar to Vision Pro’s reportedly 1,000 nits in AR and 5,000 nits peak for HDR highlights. All considered, both devices deliver best-in-class visuals; Moohan won’t make you miss Vision Pro’s display quality, and vice versa. The differences will be subtle – color tuning, field of view, and how well each handles motion (both have low-persistence OLED so minimal motion blur).

● Performance and Chipset: Here there is a fundamental divergence: Apple uses a desktop-class M2 chip (with 8-core CPU, 10-core GPU) plus a dedicated R1 co-processor for sensor fusion ^[140]. This gives Vision Pro PC-level processing and the efficiency of Apple’s custom silicon, albeit with thermal constraints of a fanless headset. Samsung’s Moohan uses Qualcomm’s Snapdragon XR2+ Gen 2, essentially a very high-end mobile SoC. In raw terms, Apple’s M2 (as used in MacBooks) outclasses a Snapdragon in CPU/GPU – but it also consumes more power. Apple offset that with the R1 chip to handle all camera and sensor data with ultra-low latency (ensuring no lag in passthrough and tracking). Qualcomm’s chip integrates those tasks, and while powerful, may not reach the sheer horsepower of M2. However, Moohan’s Gemini AI features might leverage Qualcomm’s AI cores heavily, whereas Apple currently relies on the Neural Engine in M2 (16-core) for some tasks. Both have 16 GB RAM which is plenty for multitasking ^[141]. Where Apple shines is in optimization: visionOS and M2 are tightly tuned together, while Samsung/Android XR are more general. That said, testers didn’t report any performance hiccups on Moohan; the experience was smooth with minimal lag, indicating the XR2 Gen2 platform is up to the task ^[142]. One advantage for Valve on Apple’s side: custom silicon like R1 can guarantee 12ms motion-to-photon latency for passthrough (Apple achieved a very low latency, making AR feel almost immediate). We’ll have to see if Android XR can match that responsiveness.

● Controls and Interface: The control schemes have overlapping gestures but different emphases. Apple Vision Pro relies on a triad: eye gaze to highlight, hand pinch to click or drag, and the physical “Digital Crown” dial to switch between AR and VR views (blending realities) ^[143]. There’s also voice (Siri) for dictation and basic commands. Apple’s philosophy is to make the interface invisible – you just look and pinch, and use the crown for system-level mode changes. Samsung’s Moohan supports a similar gaze + pinch interaction and even has its own physical control (a touchpad on the side strap) plus potentially a button to call up Gemini ^{[144] [145]}. However, Moohan’s standout is voice via Gemini AI, which is far more advanced than Siri. You can ask Gemini to handle complex tasks or context (“show me nearby coffee shops in AR” for example) – something Vision Pro doesn’t do out-of-the-box (Siri on Vision Pro can launch apps or transcribe, but it isn’t an intelligent guide integrated into every app). Samsung’s interface is also more multi-modal: you can mix inputs (pointing, speaking, touching) as you like, whereas Apple encourages primarily gaze+pinch and uses eye tracking very heavily for UI focus ^[146]. Apple’s eye tracking calibration is reportedly a bit longer during initial setup, but both systems achieve precise eye tracking once set ^[147]. One unique Apple control is the downward palm gesture to bring up the home menu – Moohan uses an upward-facing palm pinch to open its home menu ^[148] – minor differences in UX. Apple’s crown gives a satisfying tactile control for turning “immersiveness” up or down (blurring out the real world); Samsung doesn’t have a direct analog, though one could accomplish similar via menus or voice (“dim background”). Apple notably has no controllers and no touch surfaces (aside from the crown), everything is done in-air; Samsung hedges by providing that touchpad and planned controllers. So for pure futuristic interface, Apple is slightly more minimalist, but Samsung’s approach is arguably more versatile and accessible, especially with voice commanding a lot of praise.

● Features and Ecosystem: Apple markets Vision Pro as a “spatial computer” – essentially a new computing platform that seamlessly integrates with the Apple ecosystem. Its strength is the tight integration: if you have an iPhone or Mac, Vision Pro can extend or mirror those devices (e.g., act as a giant wireless display for your MacBook) and easily share data via iCloud. It runs visionOS, which supports many existing iPad apps with minimal tweaks, and Apple has tailored its own software (Safari, Photos, FaceTime with Persona avatars, etc.) for the device. Content-wise, Apple announced partnerships like Disney+ (so you can watch Disney content in immersive environments) and has a robust library of 3D movies and Apple Arcade games ready to go. On the other hand, Samsung’s Moohan leans on Android – meaning an even larger ecosystem of apps at launch (virtually any Android app can run in theory) ^[149]. Samsung showed off core Google apps (YouTube, Maps, etc.) running beautifully in XR ^[150]. For productivity, while Apple has iWork and calls with avatars, Google will bring Google Workspace apps into XR and perhaps leverage Google Meet for virtual meetings (potentially with AR projected people via webcams, though not confirmed). Samsung doesn’t have the same unified ecosystem lock-in as Apple, but it will appeal to those already in the Google/Android world. For instance, Android users might prefer Moohan as it could sync with Google Drive, Gmail, and their Android phones seamlessly (Samsung could integrate with Galaxy phones for things like using phone as a 6DoF controller or keyboard input, who knows). Apple’s ecosystem advantage is offset by Samsung’s open approach – Moohan will even support content from various OEMs in the future (Qualcomm expects other manufacturers to build on Android XR) ^[151], possibly meaning cross-brand compatibility in software.

A standout Moohan feature to highlight against Vision Pro: AI-driven experiences. Apple has been more conservative with AI in Vision Pro – they did not showcase something like real-time ChatGPT or image recognition in the keynote (beyond environment understanding for safety, like knowing if someone is near you). Samsung/Google are going all-in with Gemini as a core differentiator, effectively putting an AI assistant in every aspect of the experience ^[152]. This could, in theory, make Moohan feel “smarter” and more context-aware than Vision Pro, which might feel more manual in comparison. As Jason Howell observed, Gemini’s presence makes Moohan’s XR experience “feel more natural and less like you’re navigating a complex computer interface,” potentially making it more transformative over time ^[153]. Apple will likely evolve Siri/AI on Vision Pro too, but at launch, Samsung might hold an edge in that department.

● Content & Apps: Apple’s content strategy revolves around quality and exclusive experiences (e.g., immersive videos by Apple, special Disney content, and eventually first-party Apple immersive experiences). Samsung’s will rely on quantity and third-parties – meaning Moohan should have a bigger app catalog from day one, but not all apps will be optimized for XR. Meta’s Quest has tons of games; Apple has very few games at launch for Vision Pro (they seem more focused on productivity and entertainment). Samsung could bridge that: if Android XR allows easy ports of Unity VR games, Moohan could have a decent gaming lineup (including potentially some titles from the Quest library if devs port them). Additionally, Samsung can tap into the SteamVR ecosystem via partnerships – for instance, if Valve’s Deckard uses Android XR or if SteamLink app can stream PC VR to Moohan, that opens a huge library of PC VR games (this is speculative but technically feasible given standalone headsets like Pico can stream PC VR games). Apple has no official PC gaming tie-ins for Vision Pro (it’s not meant for hardcore gaming, at least not yet).

● Privacy and External Awareness: One more nuanced comparison: Apple’s Vision Pro has thoughtful features like the EyeSight (showing your eyes so people know when you’re immersed vs paying attention) and the persona avatars for video calls. Samsung’s Moohan, with no external display for eyes, means when you’re wearing it, others see basically black mirrored goggles – a less social-friendly look. However, Samsung’s removable seals mean you could leave the bottom off to show your real eyes if you want more social presence in the room (though the visor still covers them from head-on view). For virtual meetings, Google and Samsung haven’t shown their equivalent of Apple’s lifelike persona avatars; they may initially rely on traditional video feeds or cartoonish avatars in apps. Privacy-wise, Apple emphasizes that eye tracking data and environment mapping stay on device (not shared with apps without permission). Samsung/Google will likely have similar safeguards, but these are things they’ll need to communicate to build trust, especially with an always-listening AI assistant on board.

● Price: Finally, the most straightforward difference: price. Apple Vision Pro is $3,499 (when it launches in early 2024 in the US) – a price that limits it to affluent enthusiasts and professionals. Project Moohan is expected to be roughly half that cost (or even less), perhaps around ~$1,500 as discussed ^[154]. This could be Moohan’s biggest advantage in comparisons: you get a similar high-end XR experience for significantly less money. For anyone not deep in Apple’s ecosystem, Samsung’s offering will appear to deliver more bang for the buck. Even for those in Apple-land, the cost difference might make some consider Moohan if it’s supported on Android and PC. On the flip side, Apple might justify their premium with ultra-polished integration and support. But if Samsung can claim, for example, “90% of the Vision Pro experience at 50% of the price,” that’s a compelling argument to many.

Verdict of Moohan vs Vision Pro: Samsung has essentially crafted a direct competitor to Vision Pro in terms of hardware capability and general concept. Each has its strengths: Vision Pro has Apple’s refinement, ecosystem integration, and a first-mover aura; Moohan has a lower price, open platform flexibility, and pioneering AI features. One tech reviewer who tried both noted that “while Apple’s Vision Pro is undeniably impressive, Samsung’s approach with Moohan feels like it could be more transformative in the long run” due to its embrace of AI and multiple inputs ^[155]. The battle may ultimately come down to ecosystem preference (Apple vs Google) and use cases. Enterprise buyers might prefer Samsung’s because of easier deployment and cost, whereas an Apple-centric design firm might stick to Vision Pro for the seamless Mac integration. Importantly, the existence of these two devices will spur each company to improve quickly – a win for XR innovation. Consumers now have a choice: a “spatial computer” walled garden with Apple, or an “infinite” Android XR world with Samsung. Competition is heating up indeed.

Project Moohan vs. Meta Quest 3: Aiming Above the Mainstream

Meta’s Quest 3 is another key point of comparison for Project Moohan, albeit targeting a different segment of the market. The Quest 3 (released in late 2023) represents the current benchmark for mainstream VR/MR headsets – it’s relatively affordable and user-friendly. In contrast, Moohan is gunning for a higher tier. Here’s how Samsung’s XR device compares to Meta’s latest and other upcoming Meta devices:

● Price and Positioning: Meta Quest 3 starts at $499.99 for the 128GB model (and $649 for a 512GB model), putting it firmly in the mass-market category ^[156]. Samsung’s Moohan, expected around $1,500+, is literally triple the price. That price gap means these devices aren’t direct competitors for the same buyers: Quest 3 is for casual consumers, families, gamers on a budget, while Moohan is for enthusiasts/professionals willing to pay a premium. Samsung even acknowledges this – it views Moohan as far above Meta’s Quest 3 in the hierarchy, but far below Apple’s cost ^[157]. Essentially, Moohan is carving out a new upper-mid tier in XR. Meta’s own high-end attempt, the Quest Pro (launched $1,499 in 2022), flopped and got steep discounts; Samsung will try to succeed where Quest Pro struggled, by delivering more value at that ~$1K+ range. So from a consumer perspective, a Quest 3 is an impulse buy relative to Moohan. But if we compare features vs cost, we can see what the extra money buys you with Samsung’s device.

● Visuals and Displays: Quest 3 features RGB-stripe LCD displays with a per-eye resolution of 2064 x 2208 pixels at up to 90Hz (with an experimental 120Hz mode) ^[158]. While that’s a nice jump from Quest 2, it’s still a notch below Moohan’s 4K OLED per eye. In terms of clarity, Moohan’s rumored 3000 DPI micro-OLEDs blow away Quest 3’s ~1200 DPI screens ^[159] – meaning Samsung’s visuals will be markedly sharper and more “retina-grade.” Also, OLED vs LCD: Moohan’s blacks will be true black and colors potentially richer (Quest 3 LCD has good colors with quantum-dot tech, but can’t hit OLED’s contrast). Quest 3’s field of view is around 110° horizontal; Moohan’s might be similar or slightly less. Importantly, Moohan likely has higher-quality passthrough cameras: Quest 3 introduced color passthrough, but early users noted it’s decent yet not as crystal clear or lag-free as Vision Pro’s. Samsung’s passthrough as described by a tester was vibrant and clear enough to read phone screens and see faces ^[160], which suggests a high-fidelity passthrough (possibly dual 4K cameras for stereoscopic AR view, whereas Quest 3 uses dual 4MP cameras). So for mixed reality experiences, Moohan will deliver a more convincing AR overlay than Quest 3’s relatively grainier view. In essence, Moohan’s display and optical stack aim for no-compromise AR/VR, while Quest 3 makes trade-offs to stay affordable.

● Performance: Meta Quest 3 is notably the first device with the Snapdragon XR2 Gen 2 chip (the same generation Moohan uses, although Samsung’s is the “Plus” variant). So raw processing between Quest 3 and Moohan might be quite close – both XR2 Gen2, though Samsung’s might be clocked a bit higher or have better cooling (Quest 3 is fan-cooled too, for the record). Quest 3 has 8 GB RAM ^[161], half of Moohan’s 16 GB. This means Moohan can handle more simultaneous tasks or more complex environments with ease. In benchmarks, Quest 3’s XR2 Gen2 performance is strong (about double Quest 2 in graphics). If Moohan’s hardware is similar, performance won’t be a differentiator for typical tasks – except that Moohan’s heavier OS (Android XR with Gemini) might use more resources than Meta’s leaner optimized OS. Where Moohan might shine is any AI-heavy operations (Quest 3 doesn’t leverage on-device AI much beyond some predictive tracking, whereas Moohan dedicates a lot of cycles to Gemini’s AI). It’s likely Samsung’s headset, with more RAM and possibly higher binned chip, will feel snappier when multitasking multiple windows compared to Quest 3, which is more geared to running one VR game/app at a time.

● Mixed Reality & Tracking: Both devices embrace inside-out tracking and pass-through MR. Quest 3 heavily markets its mixed reality: it has a stereoscopic color pass-through (a big improvement over Quest 2’s grainy mono feed) and even a depth sensor for better scene understanding (though Meta disabled the depth sensor at launch via software). Moohan similarly has inside-out tracking and AR passthrough. Early comparisons suggest Moohan’s MR is akin to Vision Pro’s in quality (very lifelike), which would outclass Quest 3’s (good but a bit low-res and occasionally jittery). Tracking-wise, Quest 3 has excellent inside-out tracking for room-scale VR – Meta has years of experience there. Moohan should also track room movement fine; it additionally includes eye tracking, which Quest 3 does not have (Meta omitted eye and face tracking on Quest 3 to save cost, those are present only on Quest Pro). That’s a big difference: Moohan can support foveated rendering (sharpening where you look) and more natural social avatars because it tracks eyes, Quest 3 cannot. Also, Moohan’s hand tracking might be more advanced out of box – Meta’s hand tracking is decent and improving with software, but Samsung/Google seem to put hand interactions at the forefront, possibly tuning it heavily. Both support controller input: Quest 3 of course comes with two excellent Touch Plus controllers (with inside-out IR tracking on controllers themselves, no more rings), and also supports hand tracking as an option. Samsung Moohan will mainly use hand tracking and voice, but will support Bluetooth controllers (likely even Quest controllers could be theoretically paired if standards allow, though that’s speculative).

● Input & Controls: Using Quest 3 feels very different: you typically use the physical controllers for most interactions (especially in games) and only use hand tracking in certain apps or menu navigation if you want. Moohan is designed to use your hands and voice primarily, which is a more elegant experience but possibly less precise for fast gaming. However, Samsung’s potential controllers (if/when available) could allow Moohan to play the same kind of intensive VR games as Quest. It’s just not clear if Samsung will have its own controllers at launch or rely on third-party ones. If Moohan ships without controllers in box, then out-of-the-box it might not be ideal for certain game genres (like fast-paced shooters). Quest 3 definitely has the edge for a “pick up and play” gaming use-case thanks to included controllers and inside-out tracking that’s proven with numerous titles. Another factor: Meta’s controllers have inside-out tracking cameras (no need for headset to see them), whereas if Samsung offers controllers, we don’t know their tech – possibly simpler ones that require the headset cameras to see them (like VR rings) or maybe something like inside-out as well.

● Content and Ecosystem: Meta Quest has arguably the richest VR content ecosystem currently, outside of PC VR. Thousands of games and apps, including big titles like Beat Saber, VR Minecraft, etc., and Meta’s own Horizon Worlds for social VR. They also have an extensive developer community and user base. Samsung’s Moohan will start from scratch in terms of user base, but it has the advantage of Android app compatibility. That gives Moohan huge breadth (any Android video app, browser, utility can run), but not depth in VR-specific content. However, with Unity engine compatibility, porting Quest apps to Android XR could be straightforward; in fact, many Quest VR games are built in Unity or Unreal which also target Android devices (since Quest itself runs on Android under the hood). A keen observation: Quest 3’s OS is a customized Android as well – meaning a lot of the software stack isn’t totally alien. We might see developers publish their VR apps to Google Play for Android XR if the user base grows. So, Moohan could eventually run a lot of the same games as Quest (except any that Meta keeps exclusive). But at launch, Quest 3 clearly has far more immediate fun content to enjoy. Moohan, conversely, will shine in productivity and integration: it will have the full Chrome browser (Meta’s browser is more limited), native Google services (versus Meta relying on its own or Microsoft’s tie-ins for productivity), and the flexibility of an open platform (side-loading apps easily, customizing the UI, etc.).

● Audience and Use: Quest 3’s target is average consumers and gamers. It’s a family device even – something you can have kids play with (Meta even makes kid-friendly games and an upcoming Roblox launch). Samsung’s Moohan is not aimed at kids or casual gamers due to its price and complexity; it’s more for adults, professionals, early adopters. In a way, Moohan and Quest 3 might coexist rather than directly compete: a person might own a Quest 3 for gaming and a Moohan for work/advanced use, much like someone might have a Nintendo Switch and also a high-end PC. But if one must choose, the question is whether Moohan provides enough additional value to justify triple the price. For a hardcore VR enthusiast, the display quality, comfort, and AI features might indeed be worth it – especially if they plan to use it for mixed reality productivity or creative work (areas where Quest is less focused). For someone mostly wanting to play Beat Saber or VR shooters, Quest 3 is the sensible choice.

In terms of social/Multi-user features: Meta has a big push for the metaverse with Horizon and shared experiences. Samsung/Google haven’t articulated a social XR strategy yet. They might lean on existing apps (perhaps VRChat could come to Android XR, or other multi-platform social apps). But out of the gate, Quest 3 offers easier ways to party up with friends in VR games or hangouts, since the user base and infrastructure is there. Samsung might focus more on enterprise collaboration (e.g. virtual meeting rooms for business, remote collaborative design via something like Autodesk XR if available). Both can do mixed reality gaming (Quest 3 has cool MR games mapping your room; Moohan could do similar AR games with its Passthrough).

● Technology Partnerships: It’s worth noting Meta uses Qualcomm chips too (they even announced a partnership for future chips), but Meta tightly integrates hardware/software itself. Samsung’s partnership with Google and Qualcomm means Moohan’s ecosystem might extend beyond Samsung alone. For instance, we could see other manufacturers produce their own Android XR headsets that run the same apps – creating a broader market that challenges Meta’s walled garden. Meta might be “alone” carrying the consumer VR torch with Quest, whereas Samsung has Google’s backing to rally multiple brands into an Android XR alliance. Over time, this could threaten Meta if developers prefer the open Android XR platform (bigger total addressable market across devices) rather than targeting just Quest. So while Quest 3 is the big player now (and an excellent device for the cost), Samsung’s Moohan might be the harbinger of a larger Android XR ecosystem that competes with Meta’s ecosystem similar to how Android phones compete with iPhones. Qualcomm’s involvement in both means technically these devices aren’t enemies – Qualcomm wins either way – but platform-wise, it’s Meta’s closed ecosystem vs. Google/Samsung’s open one.

● Future Meta Devices: Meta is already working on Quest 3 variants and Quest 4 for the coming years. There’s rumor of a Quest “3+” or Quest 3 with minor improvements, and a true Quest 4 possibly in 2025 or 2026 with further advances (maybe even micro-OLED displays, eye tracking, etc.). Meta’s CTO has teased big AR/VR announcements and prototypes (like the “Mirror Lake” concept headset with retinal resolution and variable focus), but nothing concrete has been announced for consumers beyond Quest 3 for now. Meta’s strategy is likely to continue iterating quickly and keeping prices low, possibly releasing a Quest 4 by 2025 that might adopt some features Moohan and Vision Pro have (like better passthrough, maybe eye tracking at a mid-range price). If that happens, Samsung’s Moohan will have to keep leapfrogging in quality or find defensible features (like its AI integration).

As of now, comparing Moohan to Quest 3: Moohan is more powerful, feature-rich, and expensive; Quest 3 is more accessible, has a huge content lead, but compromises on some cutting-edge tech. For an average consumer, Quest 3 offers tremendous value – a solid 90% of the VR experience at a fraction of Moohan’s cost. For an enthusiast or enterprise user, Moohan promises a next-level experience – better visuals, more natural interaction, and the ability to use it as a serious productivity tool – that Quest 3 just isn’t designed for. If Samsung succeeds, they won’t necessarily steal the Quest 3’s audience, but they will create a new category that might peel off the high-end users (some of whom currently buy Quest Pro or Valve Index, etc.). Meta will then feel pressure either to up their high-end game (maybe a Quest Pro 2) or cede that premium segment to Samsung/Apple.

Other XR Headsets on the Horizon: How Moohan Fits into the Market

Beyond Apple and Meta, there are other notable players and upcoming devices in the XR (AR/VR) landscape that provide context for Project Moohan’s debut. Here’s a brief look at some and how Samsung’s headset compares:

• Valve “Deckard” (Upcoming): Valve, known for the PC-tethered Valve Index (a favorite among VR enthusiasts), is heavily rumored to be developing a next-generation VR headset codenamed “Deckard”. Leaks suggest Deckard will be a standalone high-end headset (with the option to tether to PC) aimed at VR gamers, possibly launching in late 2025 or 2026 ^{[162] [163]}. It’s rumored to use a Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chip (which is a step above the XR2 Gen2 in Meta Quest 3) and feature 2K×2K per-eye LCD panels ^{[164] [165]}. In other words, Valve might sacrifice a bit of resolution for high refresh rates (maybe 120Hz+) and PC compatibility. The Deckard is also expected to support inside-out tracking, eye tracking, and come with new controllers (“Valve ‘Roy’ controllers”) that look more like Quest controllers (abandoning the Index’s finger-tracking knuckles) ^{[166] [167]}. The rumored price for a Deckard bundle is around $1,200 (including controllers and games) ^[168], placing it in the premium tier but still possibly cheaper than Moohan depending on Samsung’s actual price. If Valve’s device materializes, Project Moohan will have competition on the enthusiast gaming front. Valve’s strengths are in content (SteamVR library and potentially new Half-Life VR games – rumor says they might launch Half-Life 3 or a spinoff with Deckard ^{[169] [170]}) and in PC integration. Samsung’s Moohan might not natively play PC VR games unless streaming, whereas Deckard likely will (or at least run SteamVR content standalone). So for a VR gamer deciding between high-end options in late 2025, Valve Deckard and Samsung Moohan could be two choices: Valve focusing on games and open PC ecosystem, Samsung focusing on mixed reality, AI, and mobile ecosystem. Interestingly, both likely use Qualcomm tech and inside-out tracking, so it could come down to displays (OLED vs LCD) and use-case (Moohan more AR/MR + work, Deckard more gaming). Samsung probably isn’t targeting the hardcore PC VR crowd as much, but if Moohan supports OpenXR, it could maybe run SteamVR streaming. We’ll have to see if Samsung/Google court Steam or not.
• HTC Vive XR Elite / Next-Gen Vive: HTC released the Vive XR Elite in early 2023 as a compact standalone headset priced at $1,099. It attempted to blend AR glasses and VR headset (convertible form factor) but didn’t make a big market splash. By 2025, HTC might have a successor or a new enterprise model. The current XR Elite has 2K per eye LCDs, Snapdragon XR2 Gen1, and is more of a competitor to Quest Pro. If HTC launches another XR device, Samsung’s Moohan would likely surpass it in specs given Moohan’s cutting-edge XR2 Gen2 and OLED displays. HTC’s focus has been enterprise and niche consumer – a similar zone Samsung is eyeing. However, HTC lacks the platform ecosystem (it relies on Viveport and SteamVR compatibility). In a specs showdown, Moohan likely beats current HTC offerings, and any near-term HTC headset would have to use similar components (maybe XR2 Gen2) to keep up. HTC could differentiate with design (they aim for lighter goggles-style devices). But Samsung’s brand and Google partnership might overshadow HTC in the Android XR space.
• Microsoft HoloLens & Magic Leap: These are AR-focused headsets, not directly VR, but worth noting. Microsoft’s HoloLens 2 (released 2019) is an enterprise AR visor with a see-through display – great for specialized use but not a general consumer device. There were talks of a HoloLens 3, but Microsoft’s XR efforts have stalled somewhat; by 2025 no new HoloLens has arrived, and Microsoft has been partnering with Meta (e.g., bringing Teams and Office to Quest) rather than pushing their own hardware. Magic Leap released the Magic Leap 2 (an enterprise AR headset) in 2022, targeting healthcare, defense, etc. Those devices have transparent lenses for AR rather than opaque VR displays, and they excel at specific AR tasks but with limited field of view (Magic Leap 2’s FOV is around 70°). Project Moohan, being XR, covers VR and passthrough AR but not true optical see-through AR. That said, Moohan could encroach on some enterprise AR use cases by using color passthrough to deliver AR experiences (albeit not as naturally as see-through glass can in bright environments). The advantage Moohan has is versatility: it can do VR and AR, whereas HoloLens/Magic Leap are AR only. Price-wise, HoloLens 2 and Magic Leap 2 cost several thousand dollars each (well above Moohan’s expected price). So Moohan might present a lower-cost alternative for enterprise XR projects, even if it’s not the exact same tech as HoloLens. This could pressure those companies or capture some of their market (e.g., a company might choose Moohan for training scenarios instead of a $3.5k HoloLens if AR passthrough is sufficient).
• PlayStation VR2 (Sony): Sony’s PSVR2 launched in Feb 2023 as a high-end VR headset for PlayStation 5, priced at $549. It’s not standalone (tethered to a console) and not AR/MR (pure VR with limited passthrough used only for seeing surroundings). So it’s in a different category, focused solely on console gaming. Someone deciding on Moohan vs PSVR2 likely has different intent – Moohan is not primarily a gaming console, it’s a multi-purpose device. PSVR2 does have excellent displays (OLED HDR, 2000×2040 per eye) and eye tracking, but needs a PS5 and is for seated/standing VR games. It’s unlikely a direct competitor to Moohan, but one could imagine a consumer debating whether to invest in a Moohan or a PS5+PSVR2 for entertainment. If one’s goal is gaming, PSVR2 plus PS5 is still cheaper combined than Moohan and might offer a better gaming library (like exclusive titles). But PSVR2 can’t do productivity or mobile use. So again, different markets.
• Xiaomi, Lenovo, and Others: Other tech firms have also dipped into XR. By 2025, we’ve seen Chinese companies like Pico (owned by ByteDance) release Oculus Quest-like headsets (Pico 4 in 2022, possibly Pico 5 by 2024) mainly in Asia/Europe. Those aim at Meta’s segment (mid-priced standalone VR). Samsung’s Moohan, being premium, isn’t directly challenged by Pico’s current devices which are more value-oriented (Pico 4 was ~$450). Lenovo has made some enterprise XR gear (ThinkReality VRX in 2023), also using Snapdragon XR2. But none of these have the combination of high-profile partnership and cutting-edge specs that Moohan has. If anything, these companies might become partners in the Android XR ecosystem with Samsung – for example, Qualcomm and Google’s platform could allow future Xiaomi or Lenovo headsets to run Android XR just like Moohan, increasing app compatibility across brands. In that scenario, Samsung’s Moohan might be the “reference” high-end device, while others make cheaper or specialized variants, all competing with Meta together.

In summary, Project Moohan enters a landscape with a clear high-end competitor (Apple Vision Pro), a dominant mid-range family (Meta Quest), and a looming VR enthusiast option (Valve Deckard), plus various enterprise and niche players. Samsung is positioning Moohan somewhat uniquely: premium, AI-powered XR for both work and play, in the Android ecosystem. This carve-out means Moohan might not go head-to-head with every device, but rather complements or offers an alternative path. For instance, if Valve’s Deckard is the dream of PC VR gamers, Moohan might be the dream of AR/MR productivity users – two different appeals, though both high-end.

The XR market in 2025 is still young and somewhat fragmented: Apple with its own world, Meta with its own, and now Samsung+Google+Qualcomm fostering a third ecosystem. For consumers and businesses, more competition is good news. It tends to drive down costs and push rapid improvements. We can expect that by late 2025 and 2026, each major player will iterate quickly: Apple will likely prep a second-gen Vision (or a non-Pro version at lower cost), Meta will refine its Quest line and perhaps reattempt a Pro tier, Valve will target the VR hardcore, and Samsung (with Google) will try to iterate on Moohan if the first-gen is successful.

Below, we summarize how Project Moohan compares with some of these key headsets in a quick spec comparison table:

Comparison Table: Project Moohan vs. Major XR Headsets

To crystallize the differences, this table compares Samsung’s Project Moohan with the Apple Vision Pro, Meta Quest 3, and the rumored Valve Deckard:

(Valve Deckard specs are based on leaks/rumors as of 2025 and subject to change, since the device isn’t officially announced.)

As the table shows, Samsung’s Project Moohan slots in as a premium XR headset with top-tier hardware like Apple’s Vision Pro, but aligning more with Android/PC style openness akin to what Valve or Meta offer. In many ways it tries to take the best of both worlds: the immersive quality of Vision Pro with the versatility and price consciousness of an Android device.

Outlook: The Significance of Project Moohan and the XR Landscape Ahead

The impending launch of Project Moohan is a watershed moment not just for Samsung, but for the XR industry as a whole. It signals that the race to define the next-generation computing platform – often dubbed “spatial computing” – is truly underway, with multiple tech giants in the fray. Here are a few reasons why Moohan’s debut matters and what it could mean for the market:

• Validating XR as Mainstream Tech: With Apple’s Vision Pro capturing public imagination and Samsung (the world’s largest smartphone maker) responding with Moohan, XR is no longer a niche sideshow. We’re seeing XR touted as the next big shift in how we use technology, much like the transition from PCs to smartphones. If Samsung’s gamble pays off, 2025–2026 could be remembered as the period XR moved from niche to necessary. “The launch of Project Moohan won’t just be another headset release – it could be the tipping point where XR shifts from niche to necessity in the workplace,” notes XR Today, highlighting how a successful Moohan might spur broader adoption of spatial computing as a daily tool ^[229]. Likewise, consumers will see two household brands – Apple and Samsung – each selling XR devices, which does a lot to normalize the concept of wearing a computer on your face.
• Ecosystem Battles (Android vs. visionOS vs. Meta): The situation is reminiscent of early smartphone wars. Apple has a closed ecosystem with tight integration (visionOS ~ iOS), Samsung and Google are partnering to establish an Android XR ecosystem that could be multi-manufacturer (Samsung today, maybe others like Xiaomi, Lenovo tomorrow) ^[230], and Meta/Valve represent a more gaming/social-centric ecosystem. Samsung’s Moohan is effectively Android’s entry ticket into this competition, analogous to the first Android phones that challenged the iPhone. If Android XR devices proliferate, we may see a split where developers and users choose between developing for Apple’s platform or the Android-based platform (with hopefully cross-compatibility via engines like Unity). For Google, this is a strategic way to ensure they are not left out of the next computing era after missing the first wave of AR (Google Glass) and halting their own VR (Daydream). A win for Moohan would validate Google’s approach and likely attract more OEMs to Android XR, which means more competition and innovation, and potentially quicker development of standards (like OpenXR adoption, etc.).
• Market Segmentation – Filling the Gap: Before Moohan, there was a huge price/performance gap in the XR market – $500 for Quest 3 and $3500 for Vision Pro, with not much in between besides enterprise gear. Samsung is neatly filling that “upper mid-range” void. If Moohan hits, it could reveal a strong demand for devices around $1500 that offer near-pro-level features. This might pressure Meta to adjust their strategy – possibly resurrecting a Quest Pro line at lower cost or risk ceding prosumers to Samsung. It could also push Apple eventually to consider a lower-cost model (maybe a non-Pro Vision or older tech repackaged) to compete downwards. In essence, Samsung is testing whether a somewhat more affordable XR with high specs can carve out a large user base. If it can, then XR adoption overall grows, and prices may gradually come down as components scale.
• Innovation in Input & AI: Moohan is also significant for how boldly it integrates AI and voice into XR. Many have theorized that AI + XR is the killer combo – AI to make sense of the world and provide intelligent overlays, XR to visualize it. Samsung and Google are first to really implement this at scale with Gemini on Moohan. The success or failure of this approach will be instructive. Should users find that conversing with your headset and having an AI “butler” in AR is amazing, it will push competitors to do the same. Apple will evolve Siri or maybe integrate something like OpenAI tech into VisionOS; Meta might enhance its assistant tools (they demoed a Meta AI chatbot for smart glasses recently). Essentially, Moohan could accelerate the convergence of AI and spatial computing. As one tech commentator put it, “By prioritizing AI and multiple input methods, Samsung might be creating a more accessible and adaptable XR platform” that could influence the whole industry ^[231].
• Enterprise XR Surge: If Samsung heavily courts enterprise usage – which all signs indicate – Moohan could catalyze a new wave of enterprise XR investment. Companies that were on the fence, perhaps deterred by HoloLens’s high cost or Quest’s consumer bent, might see Samsung (a trusted enterprise brand) offering a viable solution. We might see Moohan in factories, hospitals, design studios, and more. Samsung’s emphasis on private 5G, partnerships across industries, and prior XR pilots in Korea ^{[232] [233]} suggests they will bundle Moohan with wider solutions (e.g., a 5G MEC + Moohan package for low-latency training simulations on factory floors). This could steal a march on Apple, whose enterprise strategy for Vision Pro is not very clear yet (beyond selling to some professionals). In turn, broader enterprise adoption will funnel more money into XR software development for business, which often trickles down to benefit consumer features too (for example, better collaborative tools, more robust security, etc.).
• Challenges Ahead: While optimism is high, Project Moohan will also face challenges. The XR market has historically been littered with failures and slower uptake than expected. To succeed, Samsung must ensure Moohan delivers real utility – beyond the wow factor. They need developers on board to make apps that prove the value (the device’s fate could hinge on a few killer apps or use cases). Additionally, marketing XR to the public is tricky – Apple had to demo Vision Pro extensively to show why it’s needed. Samsung will have to craft a narrative for Moohan (perhaps leaning on “Galaxy AI” and working smarter, not just entertainment). Another challenge is ensuring comfort for diverse users (getting the ergonomics, prescription lens support, etc., right) – something Apple has spent a lot of time on. If Moohan ends up being used for hours a day in productivity, it must be extremely comfortable and user-friendly, or risk collecting dust after the novelty wears off.

There’s also the question of longevity: is Samsung in this for the long haul? They dipped a toe in VR before and stepped back. This time, given the investment with Google and Qualcomm, it seems more serious. But the true test will be if Moohan meets expectations. If sales are modest, Samsung might retrench; if they are strong, expect a Moohan 2 with even better tech (e.g., lighter form, better FOV, maybe holographic displays down the line).

In conclusion, Project Moohan marks the dawn of a new chapter in XR. It embodies a convergence of trends – mobile computing power, AI breakthroughs, and immersive interfaces – into a single device. For consumers and professionals interested in AR/VR, it offers an enticing promise: a cutting-edge XR experience without completely breaking the bank, and with the backing of familiar platforms (Android and Galaxy). It also intensifies the competition: Apple, Meta, Valve, and now Samsung/Google will all be pushing each other. The next couple of years will likely bring rapid advancements in XR tech, more content, and hopefully, gradually more accessible prices as the tech matures.

Whether Project Moohan itself becomes a hit or just a stepping stone, it is undoubtedly one of the most important XR launches yet, and it will shape the strategies of its rivals. As an XR analyst aptly summarized, we may soon look back on late 2025 – with Moohan’s launch – as “the day spatial computing truly went mainstream” ^[234], ushering in an era where the lines between our digital and physical worlds blur in everyday life. Samsung is betting big that this vision of the future is ready to become reality – and with Project Moohan, that future is almost here.

Sources:

• TechRadar – Samsung XR headset leak reveals potential price and release date ^{[235] [236] [237]}
• XR Today – Save the Date! Samsung XR headset Project Moohan Could Launch on Sept 29… ^{[238] [239] [240] [241]}
• Tom’s Guide – Project Moohan specs just leaked — what we’ve learned… ^{[242] [243] [244]}
• Android Central – I tested Samsung Project Moohan at Google I/O, and it’s a true Apple Vision Pro rival ^{[245] [246] [247] [248]}
• XR Today – Phew! Samsung’s Moohan Confirmed After Silence at Unpacked ^{[249] [250] [251] [252] [253] [254]}
• Samsung Newsroom – Unlock the Infinite Possibilities of XR With Galaxy AI (official Samsung announcement) ^{[255] [256] [257] [258]}
• AndroidFaithful – Samsung Moohan vs Apple Vision Pro: Hands-On Insight ^{[259] [260] [261] [262] [263] [264]}
• Hindustan Times Tech – Project Moohan – The Android alternative to Apple’s Vision Pro ^{[265] [266] [267] [268] [269] [270]}
• TechRadar – Should Meta be worried? Valve Deckard VR headset shaping up to be a beast ^{[271] [272] [273] [274]}
• Meta / Qualcomm – Quest 3 specifications (Meta press, VR-Compare) ^{[275] [276]}

References

1. www.techradar.com, 2. news.samsung.com, 3. www.techradar.com, 4. www.hindustantimes.com, 5. www.techradar.com, 6. www.techradar.com, 7. www.techradar.com, 8. www.xrtoday.com, 9. www.androidcentral.com, 10. www.hindustantimes.com, 11. www.techradar.com, 12. www.tomsguide.com, 13. www.xrtoday.com, 14. www.androidfaithful.com, 15. www.hindustantimes.com, 16. www.xrtoday.com, 17. www.hindustantimes.com, 18. www.xrtoday.com, 19. www.hindustantimes.com, 20. www.xrtoday.com, 21. www.xrtoday.com, 22. www.androidcentral.com, 23. www.xrtoday.com, 24. www.xrtoday.com, 25. www.xrtoday.com, 26. www.androidcentral.com, 27. www.xrtoday.com, 28. news.samsung.com, 29. news.samsung.com, 30. news.samsung.com, 31. news.samsung.com, 32. news.samsung.com, 33. news.samsung.com, 34. news.samsung.com, 35. news.samsung.com, 36. news.samsung.com, 37. www.xrtoday.com, 38. news.samsung.com, 39. www.hindustantimes.com, 40. www.xrtoday.com, 41. www.androidcentral.com, 42. www.androidcentral.com, 43. www.tomsguide.com, 44. www.hindustantimes.com, 45. www.tomsguide.com, 46. www.tomsguide.com, 47. www.tomsguide.com, 48. www.apple.com, 49. www.androidcentral.com, 50. www.xrtoday.com, 51. www.androidcentral.com, 52. www.xrtoday.com, 53. www.androidcentral.com, 54. www.androidcentral.com, 55. www.hindustantimes.com, 56. www.androidfaithful.com, 57. www.androidfaithful.com, 58. www.androidfaithful.com, 59. www.xrtoday.com, 60. www.hindustantimes.com, 61. www.androidfaithful.com, 62. www.androidfaithful.com, 63. www.hindustantimes.com, 64. www.hindustantimes.com, 65. www.androidfaithful.com, 66. www.androidfaithful.com, 67. www.hindustantimes.com, 68. www.xrtoday.com, 69. www.xrtoday.com, 70. www.tomsguide.com, 71. www.hindustantimes.com, 72. www.hindustantimes.com, 73. www.hindustantimes.com, 74. www.androidfaithful.com, 75. www.hindustantimes.com, 76. www.androidfaithful.com, 77. news.samsung.com, 78. www.xrtoday.com, 79. www.androidcentral.com, 80. www.androidcentral.com, 81. www.xrtoday.com, 82. news.samsung.com, 83. www.androidcentral.com, 84. www.androidcentral.com, 85. www.androidcentral.com, 86. www.androidcentral.com, 87. www.androidcentral.com, 88. www.hindustantimes.com, 89. www.hindustantimes.com, 90. www.androidfaithful.com, 91. www.androidcentral.com, 92. www.androidfaithful.com, 93. www.androidcentral.com, 94. www.tomsguide.com, 95. www.tomsguide.com, 96. www.androidcentral.com, 97. www.xrtoday.com, 98. www.androidfaithful.com, 99. www.androidfaithful.com, 100. www.xrtoday.com, 101. www.xrtoday.com, 102. www.xrtoday.com, 103. www.xrtoday.com, 104. www.xrtoday.com, 105. www.xrtoday.com, 106. www.xrtoday.com, 107. www.xrtoday.com, 108. news.samsung.com, 109. www.techradar.com, 110. www.techradar.com, 111. www.techradar.com, 112. www.techradar.com, 113. www.xrtoday.com, 114. www.androidcentral.com, 115. www.techradar.com, 116. www.xrtoday.com, 117. www.xrtoday.com, 118. www.xrtoday.com, 119. www.xrtoday.com, 120. www.techradar.com, 121. www.hindustantimes.com, 122. www.hindustantimes.com, 123. www.androidcentral.com, 124. www.androidcentral.com, 125. www.androidfaithful.com, 126. www.androidfaithful.com, 127. www.hindustantimes.com, 128. www.hindustantimes.com, 129. www.hindustantimes.com, 130. www.androidfaithful.com, 131. www.androidfaithful.com, 132. www.xrtoday.com, 133. www.xrtoday.com, 134. www.hindustantimes.com, 135. www.androidcentral.com, 136. www.androidfaithful.com, 137. www.androidfaithful.com, 138. www.androidfaithful.com, 139. www.androidcentral.com, 140. www.apple.com, 141. www.apple.com, 142. www.androidcentral.com, 143. www.androidfaithful.com, 144. www.hindustantimes.com, 145. www.hindustantimes.com, 146. www.hindustantimes.com, 147. www.androidfaithful.com, 148. www.androidcentral.com, 149. www.hindustantimes.com, 150. www.tomsguide.com, 151. www.hindustantimes.com, 152. www.androidfaithful.com, 153. www.androidfaithful.com, 154. www.hindustantimes.com, 155. www.androidfaithful.com, 156. www.xrtoday.com, 157. www.xrtoday.com, 158. en.wikipedia.org, 159. www.xrtoday.com, 160. www.androidcentral.com, 161. en.wikipedia.org, 162. space4games.com, 163. www.uploadvr.com, 164. www.techradar.com, 165. www.techradar.com, 166. www.techradar.com, 167. www.techradar.com, 168. www.techradar.com, 169. www.techradar.com, 170. www.techradar.com, 171. www.hindustantimes.com, 172. www.androidfaithful.com, 173. www.androidfaithful.com, 174. www.techradar.com, 175. www.androidcentral.com, 176. www.xrtoday.com, 177. www.apple.com, 178. www.androidfaithful.com, 179. www.qualcomm.com, 180. www.uploadvr.com, 181. www.techradar.com, 182. www.tomsguide.com, 183. www.tomsguide.com, 184. www.apple.com, 185. www.meta.com, 186. en.wikipedia.org, 187. www.techradar.com, 188. www.androidcentral.com, 189. www.androidcentral.com, 190. www.xrtoday.com, 191. www.xrtoday.com, 192. www.xrtoday.com, 193. www.hindustantimes.com, 194. www.androidfaithful.com, 195. www.androidfaithful.com, 196. www.techradar.com, 197. www.techradar.com, 198. www.androidcentral.com, 199. www.xrtoday.com, 200. www.xrtoday.com, 201. www.hindustantimes.com, 202. www.androidfaithful.com, 203. www.androidfaithful.com, 204. www.hindustantimes.com, 205. www.xrtoday.com, 206. www.androidfaithful.com, 207. www.hindustantimes.com, 208. www.xrtoday.com, 209. www.xrtoday.com, 210. www.xrtoday.com, 211. www.androidfaithful.com, 212. www.hindustantimes.com, 213. www.hindustantimes.com, 214. www.androidfaithful.com, 215. www.techradar.com, 216. www.techradar.com, 217. www.androidcentral.com, 218. www.hindustantimes.com, 219. www.xrtoday.com, 220. www.xrtoday.com, 221. www.techradar.com, 222. www.techradar.com, 223. www.xrtoday.com, 224. www.hindustantimes.com, 225. www.xrtoday.com, 226. www.xrtoday.com, 227. www.techradar.com, 228. www.techradar.com, 229. www.xrtoday.com, 230. www.hindustantimes.com, 231. www.androidfaithful.com, 232. www.xrtoday.com, 233. www.xrtoday.com, 234. www.xrtoday.com, 235. www.techradar.com, 236. www.techradar.com, 237. www.techradar.com, 238. www.xrtoday.com, 239. www.xrtoday.com, 240. www.xrtoday.com, 241. www.xrtoday.com, 242. www.tomsguide.com, 243. www.tomsguide.com, 244. www.tomsguide.com, 245. www.androidcentral.com, 246. www.androidcentral.com, 247. www.androidcentral.com, 248. www.androidcentral.com, 249. www.xrtoday.com, 250. www.xrtoday.com, 251. www.xrtoday.com, 252. www.xrtoday.com, 253. www.xrtoday.com, 254. www.xrtoday.com, 255. news.samsung.com, 256. news.samsung.com, 257. news.samsung.com, 258. news.samsung.com, 259. www.androidfaithful.com, 260. www.androidfaithful.com, 261. www.androidfaithful.com, 262. www.androidfaithful.com, 263. www.androidfaithful.com, 264. www.androidfaithful.com, 265. www.hindustantimes.com, 266. www.hindustantimes.com, 267. www.hindustantimes.com, 268. www.hindustantimes.com, 269. www.hindustantimes.com, 270. www.hindustantimes.com, 271. www.techradar.com, 272. www.techradar.com, 273. www.techradar.com, 274. www.techradar.com, 275. vr-compare.com, 276. en.wikipedia.org