- Stock Plunge to New Lows: Trex Company (NYSE:TREX) shares collapsed ~25% in early November 2025 after a disappointing earnings report. The stock fell to the mid-$30s per share – a new 52-week (and multi-year) low – down roughly 50% year-to-date [1] [2]. This wipeout pushed Trex far below previous support (~$46) and erased over half its market value in 2025.
- Q3 2025 Earnings Miss & Weak Guidance: Trex’s Q3 results badly missed expectations, with EPS of $0.51 vs $0.57 expected and revenue $285M vs $301.6M forecast [3]. Management cut full-year 2025 revenue guidance to $1.15–1.16B (flat year-on-year, vs ~$1.23B consensus) and trimmed EBITDA margin outlook to ~28% [4] [5]. They cited continued weak repair & remodel (R&R) demand and channel destocking in a “muted” housing market.
- Analyst Downgrades and Target Cuts: The earnings miss spurred a wave of analyst downgrades. Bank of America cut rating to Underperform and slashed its price target from $67 to $36 [6]. Deutsche Bank dropped from Buy to Hold (target $40, down from $92) [7]. William Blair downgraded Trex to Market Perform, flagging a “major business model reset” with weakened margins and a marketing war with rivals [8] [9]. DA Davidson also lowered its target from $60 to $45 (Neutral rating) citing Trex’s reduced sales guidance, margin pressure into 2026, and higher SG&A spend [10] [11].
- Fundamentals – Growth vs. Profitability: Despite the miss, Trex’s Q3 net sales still grew 22% YoY (to $285M) [12] and adjusted EBITDA jumped 33% (to $90M) [13], aided by improved gross margin (~40.5%) [14]. Trailing-12-month revenue is ~$1.13B [15] with robust profitability: gross margin ~39–40%, operating margin ~22–23%, and net margin ~16–17% [16]. However, growth has stalled (3-year revenue CAGR <1% [17]) and 2025 sales are now guided flat. The balance sheet remains solid – low debt (debt/equity ~0.1–0.3) and healthy cash generation [18] – enabling a newly authorized $50M share buyback [19].
- Technicals – Oversold After 25% Drop: The stock’s technical picture deteriorated with the post-earnings crash. TREX sliced through any support and is trading well below its 50-day (~$54) and 200-day (~$58) moving averages [20]. The 14-day RSI plunged to ~16 (extremely oversold) after the selloff [21], indicating capitulation-level momentum. Volume spiked (8M+ shares vs ~1.8M average) on the drop [22]. Near-term, the stock could see volatile swings as it seeks to find a bottom – key psychological support lies around the low-$30s, while the prior ~$46 level is now an upside resistance barrier.
- Forward Outlook & Catalysts: Trex’s management and several analysts have tempered short-term outlooks. Q4 is expected to be seasonally slower with continued R&R softness [23]. Analysts see limited near-term upside given intense competition and margin headwinds [24] [25]. Consensus 12-month price targets have collapsed to the mid-$50s on average (from ~$70+ prior) [26], though one outlier – B. Riley – maintained a Buy rating (albeit cutting its target to $57 from $80) [27]. Longer-term, Trex still benefits from a secular trend of homeowners shifting from wood to composite decking, and a housing stock that continues to age (driving remodeling demand). Industry forecasts (NAHB) call for remodeling activity to rebound ~5% in 2025 as homeowners tap home equity and stay put [28] [29], which could eventually revive Trex’s growth.
- ESG Leadership and Competitive Landscape: Trex markets itself as a sustainability leader in building materials – it uses ~95% recycled content in its composite boards. In 2023 alone, Trex recycled over 320 million pounds of waste polyethylene and has diverted 5+ billion pounds of plastic film from landfills over its history [30]. This earned the company recognition on Newsweek’s “Most Responsible Companies” and IBD’s “100 Best ESG Companies” lists [31] [32]. Environmentally, Trex’s products can last 2x longer than wood, reducing replacement frequency [33]. On the competitive front, however, Trex faces growing pressure from Azek (AZEK) – its primary rival in composite/PVC decking – and others like Fiberon/Deckorators. These competitors have ramped up promotions and discounts, forcing Trex into a “marketing war” that raises its costs [34]. While Trex remains the market leader in composite decking, the fight for market share (and the broader battle against traditional wood decking, still an ~80% share of new decks) is expected to intensify, potentially impacting margins until the industry’s growth resumes.
Market Performance and Recent Stock Price
Trex stock has endured a steep slide in 2025, culminating in a dramatic plunge after its early November earnings announcement. On November 5, 2025, TREX opened around $34–35 per share – down roughly 26% from the prior day’s close [35]. This selloff pushed the stock to fresh 52-week lows, shattering the previous low of ~$46 [36]. Prior to the earnings drop, Trex had already been trending downward for months; with this latest collapse, shares have lost about 50% of their value year-to-date [37] and over 50% from 12-month highs (which were near $80 [38]).
In the trading sessions leading up to the earnings release, Trex hovered in the high $40s. The 20%+ after-hours drop on Nov 4 (post-earnings) and additional declines on Nov 5 wiped out roughly one-quarter of Trex’s market cap overnight [39]. By Nov 5’s intraday trade, Trex’s market capitalization stood around ~$3.7 billion [40] (down from ~$5+ billion a week prior). The stock’s 5-day and 1-month performance are deeply negative (around –29% and –34%, respectively) [41], reflecting the abrupt investor reaction to the earnings news.
This sharp decline puts Trex at multi-year lows. The last time the stock traded in the mid-$30s was several years ago (it had run up to over $100 in 2021 before a broader pullback). The current price is even below the COVID-crisis levels of early 2020, highlighting the severity of the market’s re-rating. Notably, trading volume spiked dramatically during the post-earnings selloff – over 8 million shares changed hands on Nov 5 (versus ~1.8M average) [42] – indicating heavy institutional selling or stop-loss triggers being hit.
In summary, Trex’s recent market performance has been severely weak, with the stock entering deeply oversold territory after the earnings miss. Investors have rapidly adjusted valuations downward, pricing in a much tougher outlook (as detailed below). The question is whether this capitulation marks a bottom or if further downside is possible; that will depend on how fundamentals evolve and whether confidence can be restored.
Recent News: Earnings Miss and Company Developments
The primary news driving Trex stock’s plunge was its Q3 2025 earnings report, released after market close on November 4, 2025. The results significantly underwhelmed expectations and came with cautious guidance, catching investors by surprise:
- Earnings Miss: Trex reported adjusted EPS of $0.51, which missed Wall Street’s $0.57 consensus by $0.06 [43] (a ~9% miss). GAAP diluted EPS was $0.48 [44]. Despite the miss, EPS was up from $0.37 a year ago (thanks to cost controls and volume growth) [45], but the market focused on the shortfall vs. expectations.
- Revenue Miss: Net sales for Q3 were $285 million, up a solid +22% year-over-year, but below the ~$301.6 million analyst forecast (roughly a 5% miss) [46]. This indicates Trex’s growth, while positive, didn’t meet the high bar set by the Street. Management noted that demand in late Q3 softened more than anticipated due to industry-wide R&R (repair & remodel) weakness [47].
- Weak Guidance: More worrisome was Trex’s outlook. The company lowered its full-year 2025 revenue guidance to $1.15–$1.16 billion [48] [49]. This is essentially flat versus 2024 sales (~$1.16B) and significantly below prior analyst expectations (~$1.23B). Implied Q4 sales of only $140–150M reflect a sharper seasonal drop and continued weak demand [50]. Trex also cut its full-year adjusted EBITDA margin guidance to ~28.0–28.5%, down from ~30%+ previously [51]. In short, management reset expectations downward on both growth and profitability.
Trex’s CEO Bryan Fairbanks provided commentary explaining the soft results and outlook. He noted that while early Q3 saw some “signs of improvement” in remodeling demand, the latter part of the quarter “reflected the weaker market conditions that the industry has experienced in the past two years.” [52] Higher interest rates and housing-market headwinds have curtailed big-ticket home improvement projects. Fairbanks cautioned that this soft trend is expected to continue into the seasonally slow Q4 [53]. Additionally, Trex’s distributor partners are intentionally reducing inventory levels into year-end, further weighing on near-term sales [54]. To adapt, Trex said it is scaling back production (“level-loading” production to avoid oversupply) and working with channels to manage inventory – essentially prioritizing long-term channel health over short-term shipments [55] [56].
Another factor in Q3 was increased spending by Trex: the company ramped up branding, marketing, and R&D investments during the quarter. While this boosts long-term prospects, it contributed to higher SG&A in Q3 (15.8% of sales vs 16.6% last year, or ~15.0% on adjusted basis) [57]. Trex deliberately chose to step up promotional efforts as it launched new products and faced competitive pressure (discussed later). Fairbanks highlighted that products launched in the last 36 months accounted for 25% of Trex’s trailing-12-month sales [58] – evidence that innovation is contributing meaningfully to revenue. He also noted strong engagement metrics: web traffic and sample requests were up 50%+ YoY [59], suggesting interest in Trex products remains high. These positives, however, were overshadowed by the near-term demand slump and guidance cut.
Aside from earnings, Trex announced a few other notable developments:
- Share Buyback Authorization: Trex’s Board approved a $50 million share repurchase program [60]. This move (likely a response to the low share price and confidence in future prospects) signals that management views the stock as undervalued. However, the buyback size is relatively modest (~1.3% of market cap) and will be paced through 2025.
- Dividend: Trex does not pay a dividend (all cash returns are via buybacks), and no dividend was introduced. Given the focus on growth investments and now preserving cash amid lower guidance, a dividend remains unlikely in the near term.
- Leadership Change: In October 2025 (just prior to earnings), Trex appointed a new CFO, Prithvi Gandhi, effective Oct 6, 2025 [61]. While not directly tied to the earnings miss, a CFO transition can sometimes cause short-term uncertainty. Gandhi is expected to continue the company’s financial discipline and strategic investment approach.
- Industry & Product Updates: Trex’s press release also highlighted that railing segment sales are on track for double-digit growth in 2025 [62], a bright spot as Trex diversifies beyond decking. The company is also planning new product launches for 2026, including decking with its “SunComfortable” heat-mitigating technology (to address one drawback of composites – heat retention) [63].
In early November 2025, no other major company-specific news (like M&A or regulatory matters) surfaced beyond the earnings. The broader context is that Trex’s challenges are largely demand-driven and competitive in nature, rather than operational failures or one-off issues. Nonetheless, the earnings miss and lowered outlook were enough to trigger a severe market reaction and dominate headlines for Trex.
Analyst Commentary and Reactions
The disappointing Q3 report prompted swift and dramatic reactions from Wall Street analysts, who downgraded the stock en masse and slashed price targets. Here’s a rundown of the expert commentary and key analyst moves:
- Bank of America Securities (BofA): BofA downgraded Trex from Buy to Underperform immediately after earnings, citing growing competitive pressures and a weaker demand outlook [64]. BofA’s analyst slashed their price target from $67 down to $36 [65] – a huge reduction of ~46%, reflecting a fundamentally more pessimistic view. BofA highlighted that Trex’s lowered sales guidance and margin pressures (especially heading into 2026) undermine the prior bull thesis [66]. Essentially, BofA sees competition eroding Trex’s growth/margins enough that the stock warrants an underperform rating at these levels [67].
- Deutsche Bank: Deutsche Bank also pulled back its optimism, downgrading Trex from Buy to Hold [68]. DB cut its price target from a street-high $92 to $40 [69] – still above the current price, but a far cry from prior expectations. DB pointed to a “weak demand outlook and pressure on margins” driving their downgrade [70]. They likely believe the post-pandemic slowdown in decking demand and Trex’s need to spend more to defend share will keep earnings subdued, justifying a neutral stance.
- William Blair: Analysts at William Blair downgraded Trex to Market Perform (Hold) from Outperform, essentially moving to the sidelines [71]. In their analysis, William Blair cited a “major business model reset” at Trex, noting the company had to cut 2026 EBITDA forecasts by ~23% and is facing weakening margins and competitive pressures [72]. Notably, William Blair’s report highlighted that Trex is now being forced into a “marketing war” with rivals – ramping up promotional spending and dealer incentives – which will elevate SG&A to ~18% of sales (up from mid-teens) and pressure profitability [73]. They warn this dynamic could lead to a downward re-rating of the stock (as indeed has happened). Despite the downgrade, William Blair observed that Trex’s valuation had compressed to roughly 12× 2026 EBITDA, vs peers at ~17× – indicating the stock already trades at a discount due to its challenges [74]. In other words, Trex is cheaper than competitors, but for good reason (limited near-term upside, in their view).
- DA Davidson: DA Davidson kept a Neutral stance but cut its price target to $45 (from $60) [75] [76]. They specifically referenced Trex’s guidance cut and expectation of lower gross margins in 2026, plus higher sustained marketing/SG&A spend, as reasons for reducing the target [77]. DA Davidson also mentioned competitive concerns remaining an overhang, though they noted the initial 20%+ stock drop might have been “overdone” in magnitude [78]. Their new $45 target is based on ~15× their 2026 EBITDA estimate for Trex [79], incorporating what they called “significant cuts” to forecasts.
- Other Sell-Side Moves: In addition to the above, at least one other firm, Vertical Research, reportedly downgraded Trex from Buy to Hold with a low-end target around $32 [80]. These revisions have dragged the consensus analyst rating down to roughly a Hold/Moderate Buy and dramatically lowered the average price target. Prior to earnings, Trex had an average target in the $70s [81]. As of Nov 5, the average target is around $54 [82] (with targets ranging from low $30s up to ~$60s). This still implies upside from the current price, but much less bullish than before. In fact, the distribution of ratings now includes at least a couple of Sells/Underperforms, whereas a week ago virtually all were Buys or Holds [83].
- Bullish Holdouts: Amid the pile-on, a few analysts maintained a positive long-term view. Notably, B. Riley reaffirmed their Buy rating on Trex, though they too tempered expectations by cutting their target from $80 to $57 [84]. B. Riley’s stance suggests they see the selloff as an opportunity and believe Trex can eventually recover, given its industry leadership. Their $57 target implies significant upside (~65% above the current price), reflecting confidence in Trex’s fundamentals once the current storm passes. Additionally, Robert W. Baird had upgraded Trex to Outperform back in July 2025 (when the stock was much higher) with a $75 target [85]; it’s possible they, and other previously bullish firms, are reassessing their targets now. As of early November, the net sentiment has clearly turned more cautious.
- Analyst Quotes: While many research notes are proprietary, some quotes have emerged via news sources. For example, an Investing.com summary noted analysts see Trex’s earnings reset and rising costs as necessitating a “re-rating” of the stock [86] [87]. Another report summarized that “competitive concerns” will continue to weigh on Trex’s valuation [88]. The consensus message: Trex’s growth story has hit a snag due to industry and competitive issues, and until there are signs of re-accelerating demand or easing competition, analysts are reluctant to recommend aggressively buying the stock despite its now-lower price.
In sum, the analyst community reaction has been starkly negative in the short run – downgrades and target cuts underscore reduced confidence. However, a few voices still highlight Trex’s long-term strengths (market leadership, secular tailwinds) and consider the selloff potentially overdone [89]. Investors are thus navigating a mixed narrative: near-term caution vs. longer-term value. This tension often creates volatility, as we’re seeing with Trex.
Fundamental Analysis: Financial Health and Performance
From a fundamental perspective, Trex is a company with solid profitability and a strong balance sheet, now grappling with a slowdown in growth. Let’s break down key fundamental metrics and recent performance:
Revenue and Growth: Over the past twelve months, Trex generated roughly $1.13 billion in revenue [90]. Growth has been modest – the three-year revenue CAGR is under 1% [91] – reflecting some stagnation after a surge in home-renovation spending during 2020-2021. In 2022, Trex faced an inventory correction in its channel, causing a dip in sales. 2023 saw some recovery, and 2025 YTD sales are up ~3% (first 9 months) [92]. However, with full-year 2025 sales now guided to ~$1.15B [93] (essentially flat vs 2024’s $1.14B), revenue growth remains muted.
In Q3 2025 specifically, revenue was $285M (as noted), an increase of 22.1% from the prior-year quarter [94]. This high growth rate is partly because year-ago quarters were depressed by channel destocking. It shows Trex can still grow when demand normalizes. But the miss versus forecast indicates Trex’s current growth is below the industry’s earlier expectations – likely due to softer end-market demand.
Profit Margins: Trex’s business model historically boasts strong margins, thanks to its premium pricing, brand strength, and manufacturing efficiency. In Q3, the gross profit was $115M, yielding a gross margin of 40.5% [95] (up slightly from 39.9% a year ago). On an adjusted basis (excluding some start-up costs), gross margin was ~41% [96]. This margin expansion despite revenue shortfall indicates Trex achieved cost efficiencies (perhaps via improved production processes or lower raw material costs) [97]. Year-to-date gross margin is about 40.6%, which is down from ~43.8% in the first 9 months of 2024 [98] – confirming that 2025 margins have been under pressure overall, likely due to higher raw material costs early in the year and increased promotions.
Operating expenses have risen as Trex invested more in marketing and R&D (as mentioned). In Q3, SG&A was $45M (15.8% of sales) or $43M (15.0%) on an adjusted basis [99]. This is higher in absolute dollars than a year ago, but Trex still exercised some discipline – operating leverage from higher sales meant SG&A ratio actually ticked down slightly year-on-year. The company signaled that SG&A may go up toward ~18% of sales in coming periods to support growth initiatives [100], which would compress operating margins relative to the unusually high margins seen during the pandemic boom (when demand was high and marketing spend low).
Earnings and Cash Flow: Net income for Q3 2025 was $52 million (GAAP), up ~28% YoY, and adjusted net income was $55M [101]. This translates to EPS of $0.48 GAAP ($0.51 adjusted) [102]. The net profit margin in the quarter was ~18% (adjusted) – quite healthy and up from ~17.5% last year. For the first nine months of 2025, however, net income of $188M was down from $217M in the same period 2024 [103]. Full-year 2025 EPS is now likely to come in around $1.80–1.90 (versus ~$1.99 in 2024), given the weaker Q4 guidance. Analysts currently forecast FY2025 EPS around $2.04 [104] (which may be trimmed further), and a roughly flat or slightly up EPS for 2026 as sales gradually improve.
Trex generates robust cash flows. Year-to-date 2025, operating cash flow was $293M [105], easily covering its modest capital expenditures (Trex finished a major capacity expansion in recent years, so capex needs have declined). The company has funneled excess cash into share repurchases – Trex bought back stock earlier in 2025 and still had authorization prior to the new $50M addition [106]. Despite the Q3 stumble, Trex’s cumulative cash generation remains a core strength.
Balance Sheet Strength: Trex’s financial position is strong. The company carries minimal debt – debt-to-equity is only ~0.14 (14%), with long-term debt-to-equity a mere 0.03 [107]. Essentially, Trex has almost no leveraged debt; it primarily uses cash from operations to fund growth. It ended Q3 with an unremarkable cash balance (cash & equivalents were only a few million dollars [108], as Trex tends to keep cash low and pay it out or reinvest). The low cash might make liquidity appear tight – current ratio ~1.2 and quick ratio ~0.7 [109] – but Trex has ample available credit and working capital. Inventories and receivables are the main current assets, and inventory levels have been managed down in line with demand.
Trex’s Altman Z-score is 8.47 [110], which is very high, indicating a negligible risk of financial distress. The company’s interest coverage is excellent given its EBITDA and negligible interest expense. In short, Trex’s balance sheet and cash flows are not a concern – the company can weather a downturn, invest in new products, and even opportunistically buy back shares without jeopardizing its stability.
Return Metrics: Trex historically delivers strong returns on capital. Trailing return on equity (ROE) is around 20–21% [111], and return on invested capital (ROIC) in the high teens. These figures have dipped from the peak (when ROE was ~30%+ during boom times), but they remain solid and reflect a business with a durable competitive advantage and pricing power. Even with earnings down in 2025, Trex’s ROE near 20% is impressive for a manufacturing company, underlining its high-margin model.
Valuation Multiples: The recent plunge has significantly compressed Trex’s valuation. At ~$34/share, Trex trades at about 17× forward earnings [112] (using FY2025–26 EPS ~$2.00) and roughly 3.1× revenue (P/S) [113]. Its EV/EBITDA is around 11.5× now [114]. These multiples are below the stock’s historical averages and below many peers (for example, Azek and other building product peers often trade closer to 15–20× earnings). However, the low multiples also reflect lowered growth expectations – Trex’s PEG ratio is over 20 [115], implying very low projected earnings growth (analysts expect only ~1% EPS growth going forward) [116]. If Trex can re-accelerate growth even modestly, the stock could appear quite cheap at these levels. Conversely, if earnings were to decline further or stagnate, the valuation may be fair or even still rich.
Quality of Earnings: It’s worth noting that Trex’s earnings quality is generally high – the company has minimal adjustments, clean accounting (low risk of manipulation per Beneish M-score of –2.47) [117], and it consistently converts earnings to cash. The Q3 adjusted vs GAAP differences were small (a few cents for startup costs). So the reported numbers can be taken at face value.
In summary, Trex’s fundamentals show a profitable, financially healthy company that has hit a growth air-pocket. The business remains fundamentally sound – high margins, low debt, good cash flow. The main fundamental concern is lack of growth in the near term and potential margin erosion if competition forces higher costs or price concessions. If the macro environment improves and Trex’s marketing investments pay off in renewed sales momentum, the fundamental picture could quickly brighten, given the company’s operating leverage. But for now, caution is warranted until there are tangible signs of demand recovery.
Technical Analysis: Price Trends and Indicators
Trex’s stock chart has turned decidedly bearish in 2025, with the recent earnings-triggered crash accelerating a downtrend. Here are the key technical factors and levels:
- Downtrend and Moving Averages: TREX is in a clear downtrend, marked by a series of lower highs and lower lows throughout 2025. The stock is now trading far below major moving averages. As of Nov 5, Trex was around $34, versus its 50-day simple moving average (SMA) near $54.50 and 200-day SMA around $57.7 [118]. Being ~35% under the 50-day and ~40% under the 200-day average confirms extreme weakness – such a gap typically signals an oversold condition but also significant technical damage. Those moving averages will act as overhead resistance on any rebound. In fact, Trex hasn’t been above its 200-day MA since mid-year, and the 50-day MA has also started sloping downward after the latest fall, indicating negative momentum.
- Relative Strength Index (RSI): The 14-day RSI for TREX dropped into the teens after the earnings plunge. It registered around 16 on Nov 5 [119], which is deeply oversold (by comparison, RSI below 30 is generally considered oversold). An RSI this low is relatively rare and suggests a short-term bounce could occur if selling exhaustion sets in. Indeed, extreme RSI readings often precede at least a technical relief rally. However, an oversold stock can also remain oversold in a sustained downtrend, especially if fundamental news continues to disappoint. Until RSI and other indicators turn up, catching a falling knife like Trex is risky.
- MACD & Momentum: While specific MACD values aren’t cited, it’s clear the MACD (Moving Average Convergence Divergence) momentum oscillator for Trex has been in negative territory and likely widened further on the recent drop. The rapid decline created a large gap down in the price chart (from ~$48 to ~$35). Momentum is firmly to the downside – traders will watch for the MACD line to start curling upward or a bullish divergence (e.g. higher lows on RSI or MACD even if price makes a lower low) as potential signs of a bottoming process. As of now, no such divergence has been confirmed; the momentum indicators have largely been confirming the price weakness.
- Support and Resistance Levels:Support levels for Trex are tricky now because the stock is in uncharted territory relative to recent years. The prior 52-week low was around $46 [120] – that level was obliterated, so it now becomes a resistance level on the way back up. The stock’s all-time high was ~$140 in 2021; more relevantly, its lows in 2020 were in the mid-$20s. One could infer potential support near $30 (a round number), which is where the stock traded around late 2019/early 2020 before the pandemic run-up. Another possible support zone could be the low-$20s (Trex’s late 2018 lows and the point of a major breakout in 2019). These are not exact science, but they offer reference points if the slide continues. In the near term, the stock seems to have found some footing around the $33–$35 area in the days after earnings – this could form a temporary base, but it’s too early to tell if it will hold. On the upside, initial resistance is around $40 (where the stock paused briefly during the fall). Above that, the $46-48 zone (the old support) is now a key resistance – representing the gap fill area and the bottom of the pre-crash trading range.
- Trading Volume and Selling Pressure: The massive volume on the selloff (nearly 5× average volume) [121] indicates a high level of distribution – many shares changed hands, possibly from institutional holders to opportunistic buyers. Often, big volume climactic sell-offs can mark a capitulation bottom. The next sessions will be telling: if volume quickly dries up and the stock stabilizes, it might indicate that the worst of the forced selling is done. If high volume selling persists and drives the stock lower, that means more significant holders are still exiting. Monitoring on-balance volume (OBV) or volume patterns could give clues as to whether accumulation is happening at these prices.
- Technical Indicators Summary: According to Investing.com’s technical summary (as of Nov 5), most indicators were flashing “Strong Sell” on the daily timeframe [122]. This is not surprising given the trend and moving average alignment. However, a GuruFocus report noted that technical indicators like RSI ~36 (just before the big plunge) suggested Trex was “approaching oversold territory” and could attract value-oriented buyers [123]. Now, with RSI in the teens, that argument is even stronger from a contrarian perspective. The stochastic oscillators also likely show oversold conditions. Traders may watch for a bounce to the 20-day MA or a Fibonacci retracement of the plunge (for example, a 38.2% retracement of the ~$14 drop could target around $39–$40) if a relief rally occurs.
In conclusion, the technical picture for TREX is very weak in the short run but primed for a possible reflexive rebound due to oversold signals. Longer-term, the stock will need to base and repair the damage. For bullish momentum to reassert, Trex would need to break back above resistance levels (first $40, then mid-$40s) and establish a pattern of higher lows – which likely requires improving fundamentals or news. Absent that, the path of least resistance could remain downward or sideways. Cautious investors might wait for confirmation of a bottom (e.g. a double bottom pattern or momentum indicators turning up) before committing new capital, whereas aggressive traders may try to play the short-term oversold bounce with tight risk management.
Forecast and Outlook
Short-Term (Next 1–2 quarters): The outlook for Trex in the immediate term is guarded. The company itself expects a continued lull in Q4 2025, with sales down sequentially and roughly flat year-on-year [124]. Given that Trex’s products are seasonal (spring/summer are peak for decking), Q4 is always slower, but this year will be especially so due to weak R&R demand and destocking. Thus, Q4 earnings (due in early 2026) are likely to be lackluster. Analysts will be watching if Trex’s revised guidance is conservative enough or if further misses could occur. Any additional guide-down or signs that demand in early 2026 isn’t picking up could pressure the stock further.
Analysts’ current consensus for FY2025 EPS is around $1.95–2.05 (which includes the weak Q4) and for FY2026 perhaps $2.10–2.20, indicating low-single-digit growth at best. Some forecasters have likely cut their 2026 estimates after Trex’s management commentary about “lower gross margins in 2026” due to higher costs [125]. This means even if sales improve a bit next year, margins could be slightly lower due to full-year impact of increased marketing spend and possibly competitive pricing.
On the positive side, any stabilization in interest rates or improvement in consumer confidence could help the home improvement sector sooner than expected. There is a chance that by spring 2026, demand could surprise to the upside if pent-up projects resume. Additionally, Trex’s easier comps (flat 2024 and 2025 sales) mean that any uptick in orders could translate to visible growth rates in 2026.
Longer-Term (1–3 years): In the longer horizon, Trex’s outlook will depend on both macro trends and its competitive standing:
- Secular Demand Tailwinds: The secular trend from wood to composite decking remains intact. Only an estimated ~25-30% of decking demand has converted to composite materials so far [126]. Azek has suggested the penetration could eventually reach 50% as homeowners increasingly opt for low-maintenance, sustainable decks over wood [127]. Trex, as the category leader, stands to benefit enormously if this conversion accelerates. The total addressable market (TAM) for decking is large (tens of billions globally), so even moderate share gains from wood can support growth. Over a multi-year period, this provides a built-in growth runway – but the pace is the question. If economic conditions improve (or if wood lumber prices spike, making composites relatively more attractive), composite adoption could speed up. Conversely, if consumers are cash-strapped, they may defer deck projects or opt for cheaper wood initially.
- Remodeling and Housing Cycle: The broader housing/remodeling cycle will be a key determinant of Trex’s fortunes. As noted earlier, the NAHB forecasts remodeling activity to grow ~5% in 2025 and another 3% in 2026 [128], citing drivers like aging homes and high home equity. Homeowners with low mortgage rates have an incentive to improve their existing homes rather than move (especially given expensive housing and mortgage costs for a new purchase). This dynamic could create a robust backdrop for companies like Trex, assuming consumers open their wallets for improvement projects. If inflation continues to ease and the Fed eventually cuts rates by mid/late 2026, consumer discretionary spending on big projects could rebound. Trex would likely see a multi-year demand uptick in such a scenario. Many analysts still view Trex as a growth story long-term, with consensus (pre-miss) projecting high-single-digit percentage revenue growth over a few years, alongside margin recovery.
- Analyst Expectations: At the moment, Wall Street consensus (after the latest revisions) gives Trex an average 12-month price target around $54 [129]. That implies analysts, on average, see the stock recovering some of its losses and trading at perhaps ~25× next year’s earnings – a level more commensurate with a quality growth company, assuming it gets back on track. However, those targets vary widely. More bullish analysts (like B. Riley) clearly believe Trex’s brand and fundamentals will reassert and that the current issues are transitory. Their $57 target suggests a view that Trex could regain a mid-teens EBITDA multiple once investors see a bottom in earnings [130]. On the other hand, bearish targets in the mid-$30s (e.g. Vertical Research at $32, BofA at $36) indicate a belief that the stock may not have much upside beyond current levels if challenges persist [131] [132]. The range of analyst opinions – from ~$32 to ~$60 – underscores the uncertainty.
- Catalysts and Risks: For Trex to outperform forecasts, a few potential catalysts could come into play: (1) Easing competition – if competitors like Azek scale back aggressive promotions (perhaps due to their own capacity or cost constraints), Trex might not need to spend as much or cut price, allowing margins to stabilize. (2) New product success – Trex has new decking lines (e.g., boards with cooling tech, new colors, railing systems) launching in 2026 [133]; if these are hits, they could drive incremental volume and share gains. (3) M&A or expansion – while Trex hasn’t indicated any acquisition plans, the company could explore adjacent products or technologies to boost growth (for instance, its foray into porch flooring, outdoor furniture licensing, etc., could expand revenue streams). (4) Macro boost – a broad improvement in consumer spending, or stimulus towards home renovation (not currently expected, but not impossible), would directly benefit Trex.
Conversely, risks include: (1) Persistent weak housing – if high rates and economic slowdown continue well into 2026, the remodeling recovery might stall, hurting Trex’s top line further. (2) Market share losses – if Azek or others take significant share (through pricing or channel presence), Trex’s growth could lag even if the market recovers. (3) Commodity costs – Trex’s input costs (plastic resins, wood fibers) and freight can impact margins; any spike there could squeeze profits, especially since Trex may have less room to raise prices in a soft demand environment. (4) Execution issues – ramping down production and then up again can be tricky; any operational hiccups or inventory writedowns would be a negative surprise.
On balance, the general expectation is that 2026 could be a “reset” year where Trex stabilizes and returns to growth, albeit from a lower base. Many analysts likely model a rebound in earnings by 2027, assuming the macro environment normalizes. Trex’s own confidence in the future is hinted by its buyback and continued product development plans – management is not behaving as if the business is structurally impaired, rather that it’s navigating a cycle.
Investors with a long horizon will be evaluating Trex’s competitive moat during this period: can its brand, scale, and channel relationships help it emerge stronger when demand improves? Trex still commands roughly 50%+ share of the composite decking market (with Azek around ~20-30% and others fragmenting the rest) [134]. Maintaining that lead and the premium brand image is crucial to its long-term forecasts. The company’s actions – investing in marketing, protecting channel partner health, innovating products – suggest it is playing the long game to ensure it captures a big slice of the eventual rebound.
In summary, the near-term forecast for Trex is challenging – expect subdued earnings and possibly continued stock volatility over the next couple of quarters. The longer-term outlook is more optimistic if one believes in the secular trends and Trex’s enduring franchise. Professional analysts have markedly lowered short-term expectations (hence the stock’s re-rating), but many still foresee better days ahead in 2026-2027 once the current headwinds abate. Investors should watch upcoming earnings calls for any changes in tone – e.g., signs that order rates are picking up in early 2026 would be an early indicator that the worst is over. Until then, caution is warranted, but for contrarians, Trex’s beaten-down valuation could offer a compelling risk/reward if the company can prove the recent stumble is temporary.
ESG and Sustainability Considerations
One aspect that sets Trex apart in the building materials sector is its strong commitment to environmental sustainability, which has become increasingly important for investors and customers alike. Trex’s entire business model is built around recycling and eco-friendly practices:
- Recycled Materials: Trex’s composite decking is made from 95% recycled content, combining reclaimed wood fibers with recycled polyethylene plastic (such as grocery bags, pallet wrap, etc.). In 2023 alone, Trex recycled over 320 million pounds of waste PE film that would otherwise likely end up in landfills [135]. Over its 30+ year history, Trex has recycled more than 5 billion pounds of plastic [136], making it one of the largest plastic film recyclers in North America. This circular use of materials means every Trex deck essentially gives new life to waste that is hard to recycle by other means. The company also recycles nearly 100% of its own manufacturing scrap back into production [137], striving for minimal waste in its operations.
- Environmental Impact: Using recycled plastic and wood byproducts not only reduces waste but also avoids the environmental impact of producing virgin materials. Trex likes to point out that its decks, which come with 25–50 year warranties, last 2–3 times longer than wood decks [138]. That longevity means fewer replacements and less frequent resource consumption over time. For every Trex deck board used, the environmental impact from producing two equivalent wood boards is avoided [139] (since a Trex board lasts about twice as long as wood). Additionally, Trex’s products do not require paint or stain (which can contain harmful chemicals) and need only soap-and-water cleaning, reducing the use of harsh cleaners.
- Carbon Footprint: Trex hasn’t publicly disclosed a full carbon footprint, but by using recycled content, it likely has a lower carbon intensity than if it were sourcing all virgin plastic/wood. Trex’s manufacturing plants (in Virginia and Nevada, with a new facility in Arkansas ramping up) are designed for efficiency. Pursuing energy efficiency and possibly renewable energy at its facilities could further burnish Trex’s environmental profile. The company’s Sustainability Report highlights continuous improvements in manufacturing efficiency and even pilot programs to recover construction scrap for reuse [140].
- ESG Ratings: Third-party ESG ratings consider Trex a relatively low-risk company. Sustainalytics (Morningstar) assigns Trex an ESG Risk Score around 22.8 (Medium risk) [141], which is decent for an industrial manufacturer. Notably, Trex has zero significant ESG controversies reported [142]. Its Environmental and Social risk sub-scores are low, reflecting the positive aspects of its recycled inputs and safe products, while Governance risk is also well-managed (Trex has an independent board and typical shareholder rights for a U.S. mid-cap). In 2023, Investor’s Business Daily named Trex one of the “100 Best ESG Companies”, and Newsweek included Trex in America’s Most Responsible Companies [143] [144]. These accolades suggest Trex is recognized for its sustainability efforts at a national level. Furthermore, Trex has been Barron’s 100 Most Sustainable Companies list in 2024 [145]. Such recognition can enhance Trex’s brand appeal and make it attractive to ESG-focused investors.
- Social and Governance: On the social front, Trex has initiatives for community recycling (its NexTrex program engages schools to collect plastic for recycling) [146] and emphasizes safety (they reduced lost-time incident rates significantly in 2023) [147]. The company has also improved diversity and training for employees [148], indicating progress on human capital aspects. Governance-wise, Trex’s leadership is stable (CEO Bryan Fairbanks has been with Trex for many years, taking the helm in 2020) and the company has separated the CEO and Chairman roles. There haven’t been governance scandals or accounting issues; Trex’s Beneish M-score suggests low risk of earnings manipulation [149], and its shareholder meetings have been routine.
- Product Sustainability Angle: Trex’s sustainability message also doubles as a marketing tool: consumers who choose Trex decks are often motivated not just by durability but by the fact that Trex decks help “save trees” and reuse plastic. Trex often states that for every 500 square feet of deck, ~140,000 plastic bags are recycled. In an era of increasing environmental awareness, this narrative resonates, especially with younger homeowners. Additionally, Trex’s avoidance of wood preservatives (which can leach chemicals) makes it appealing for those concerned about the environmental impact of traditional treated lumber.
- ESG Risks: One could argue an ESG risk for Trex is that it relies on plastic (a fossil fuel derivative) – if sentiment turned against any plastic use, that could be a concern. However, since Trex is using recycled plastic, it’s generally viewed positively. Another angle: climate change – more extreme heat could make composite decks hotter (hence Trex developing heat-mitigating tech), and extreme weather could affect outdoor living demand. But these are relatively minor or manageable issues.
In conclusion, Trex’s ESG profile is a net positive. The company has integrated sustainability into its DNA and reaps both brand and cost benefits (recycled plastic can be cheaper than virgin, and it secures supply). From an investor standpoint, Trex scores well on ESG metrics for its industry, and its inclusion in various “responsible company” lists underscores that. While ESG alone won’t drive the stock if financials falter, it does provide an extra layer of resilience – for example, Trex’s eco-friendly stance might help it win over big retailers (Home Depot and Lowe’s stock Trex and have their own ESG goals) and even attract ESG-focused funds to invest on any dips.
Thus, as part of a comprehensive analysis, Trex’s strong sustainability performance and recognition serve as a long-term asset. It aligns the company with regulatory trends (e.g., recycling mandates) and consumer values, potentially giving it an edge over less sustainable competitors. The ESG factor may not shield Trex from short-term market forces, but it is likely to play a role in the company’s enduring brand strength and market leadership.
Competitive Landscape and Industry Factors
Trex operates in the niche but growing market of wood-alternative (composite and PVC) decking and railing, which is part of the broader building products industry. Understanding its competitive landscape and macro factors is critical:
Key Competitors: Trex’s main direct competitor is The AZEK Company (NYSE: AZEK). Azek produces composite decking (under brands like TimberTech) and also PVC decking and trim products. Azek and Trex together dominate the high-performance decking category, with Trex generally holding the #1 market share and Azek #2. As of recent years, Trex’s share in composite decking was estimated around 50–55%, and Azek’s around 25–30%, with the remainder split among smaller players (e.g., Fiberon (owned by Fortune Brands), Deckorators (owned by UFP Industries), and a few regional brands) [150]. There’s also indirect competition from traditional wood (pressure-treated lumber, cedar, etc.), which still accounts for the majority of decks built.
Competitive Dynamics: Lately, competition has intensified. Azek and others have been aggressive in promotions and rebates to capture market share during the industry slowdown. William Blair’s analysts specifically noted that rivals have increased marketing spend and “Trex is being forced to match incentives to keep up” [151]. This has effectively turned the market into a price and marketing battle, eroding some of Trex’s historical advantage. Azek, for instance, launched extended financing offers and stepped up co-marketing with dealers. Fiberon partnered with more distributors to widen its reach. Trex responded with its own stepped-up branding campaign (e.g., the “We See It Too” ad campaign in 2025) [152] and more consumer promotions than usual. While Trex’s brand is the most recognized (Trex has been rated “America’s Most Trusted Outdoor Decking” several years in a row) [153], loyalty is being tested when competitors offer lower prices or new features.
Azek has also touted product differentiators (like PVC decking that’s lighter or more scratch-resistant, or “cooler” surface tech similar to Trex’s). The competition isn’t only on price; it’s also on innovation and distribution. Trex has the broadest distribution network (6,700+ outlets globally) [154], but Azek is trying to close the gap by signing on more lumberyards and Home Depot locations for its TimberTech line.
Another competitor mention is James Hardie, a big name in siding that has shown interest in expanding into other building products [155]. While not a direct competitor yet, large building material firms could potentially enter the segment or acquire smaller players, increasing competitive pressure.
Market Share and Switching: Historically, Trex has been able to take share from wood steadily, and also maintain an edge over other composites due to its early mover advantage and brand reputation. However, if Trex is perceived as too expensive or if quality issues arise, it could lose share. Notably, in early 2020s, supply chain issues and shortages led some contractors to try alternative brands if Trex was unavailable. Now supply is normalized, but price differences might influence choices. Trex has a “good-better-best” product lineup (Enhance, Select, Transcend lines) at various price points to compete across segments, whereas Azek similarly has multiple tiers including PVC. The breadth of line is a competitive asset for Trex.
Broader Materials Inflation/Deflation: The cost environment has been a factor. In 2021-2022, wood prices spiked, making Trex’s price premium smaller and boosting composite demand. Now wood lumber prices have moderated, somewhat widening the cost gap between a wood deck and a Trex deck. This can slow composite adoption in a tight consumer budget scenario. Conversely, plastic costs (PE resin) have come down from highs, benefiting Trex’s input costs. So there’s a push-pull: cheaper wood is a headwind, cheaper plastic is a tailwind. Over the long run, Trex argues that even at a higher upfront cost, its decks are lower total cost of ownership (no painting, replacement, etc.), which is a selling point if consumers take a lifecycle view.
Housing & Macro Factors: Trex’s business correlates with housing and remodeling activity. When homebuilding is strong, Trex sees demand from new home decks; when existing home sales are high, new owners often add or renovate decks. The current environment (late 2024–2025) has been tough: high mortgage rates (7-8%) have cooled home sales and renovations. The Remodeling Market Index dropped in 2025, reflecting contractors seeing fewer projects [156]. Trex itself noted “muted R&R activity” and that distributors are cutting inventory – signs of a cyclical downturn. On the flip side, as the NAHB report suggested, record home equity and aging homes should eventually spur more remodeling [157] [158]. It’s a question of timing.
Seasonality: It’s also important to note Trex’s seasonal sales pattern – typically strongest in Q2 and Q3 (spring and summer decking season), weaker in Q4 and Q1. Weather can play a role; a long winter or wet spring can delay projects. Geographic mix matters too (Trex is big in North America; an expansion in Europe or other markets could diversify seasonality).
Competitive Outlook: In the coming years, the competitive landscape could evolve further:
- If the market grows again, all players may benefit, but Trex and Azek will vie for the lion’s share of growth. Their rivalry could drive innovation (e.g., more realistic wood-look finishes, cooler surface tech, etc.) and perhaps constrain how much they can raise prices.
- There is also the possibility of industry consolidation. Smaller composite manufacturers might be acquired by bigger ones (e.g., Fiberon was acquired by Fortune Brands). Could Trex or Azek be a takeover target for a larger building products company? It’s speculative, but not impossible, especially with Trex’s stock now lower – though Trex has historically enjoyed independence and is a strong brand on its own.
- Decking vs. Alternatives: There’s competition from other outdoor living options – for example, concrete patios are an alternative to decks in some regions; sunrooms or other improvements can compete for the same wallet share. But decks remain a popular feature for houses, and composites are steadily winning over wood in that domain.
Trex vs Azek Financials: For context, Azek’s latest results (Q3 FY2025 for them likely corresponded to mid-year) showed that Azek was growing its Residential segment at a decent clip and had improved margins after its own cost-cutting. Azek’s stock has also been volatile but did not crash as hard as Trex’s since Azek’s guidance might not have been as aggressive to begin with. Interestingly, Azek’s market positioning is slightly more premium on the PVC side and mid-range on composites, so how Trex and Azek navigate pricing in a weak market is a key part of the competitive landscape. If Azek decides to undercut on price to gain share, Trex could feel pain and vice versa.
Competitive Moats: Trex’s moats include its strong brand recognition (homeowners often ask for Trex by name), its established distribution network (it’s deeply entrenched with contractors and retailers), proprietary manufacturing know-how (efficient reuse of materials, etc.), and economies of scale as the largest player. Azek competes on innovation (e.g., PVC is a different tech that Trex doesn’t do, appealing to some customers) and on also having a broad product set (Azek also sells siding, trim, etc., giving it cross-selling opportunities).
In summary, the competitive landscape is a critical factor for Trex’s future. Right now, competition is contributing to Trex’s challenges – the term “marketing war” captures that there is pressure on margin and effort needed to defend share [159]. Trex still appears to be the leader, but it can’t be complacent. The company’s actions (increased marketing spend, new product development, expanding into railing and accessories) show it’s keenly aware of the competitive threats. Over the long term, if the market returns to growth, Trex and Azek could both thrive, though Trex aims to capture the bulk of the conversion from wood. If the market remains flat, it becomes a share game, which could be tougher.
Macro factors like interest rates, consumer confidence, and the housing cycle act as the backdrop against which this competition plays out. Right now that backdrop is tough – which has led to the current downturn for Trex. A more favorable backdrop (e.g., a housing rebound, or even stimulus for green building – since Trex is recycled, it could potentially benefit from any “green” building incentives) would provide a rising tide that makes competitive battles less painful.
Investors should keep an eye on competitor earnings (Azek, etc.) for clues: if competitors also report weak demand, it’s an industry issue (which is somewhat easier to recover from when macro improves). If competitors report better numbers, Trex might be losing share specifically – a more concerning sign. So far, evidence suggests it’s primarily an industry slowdown, with both Trex and peers feeling it, though Trex’s bigger miss may imply a bit of share loss or overly optimistic prior projections on Trex’s part.
Overall, Trex’s competitive and macro environment is challenging in the short term, but the company’s entrenched position and the eventual rebound of its market provide grounds for cautious optimism longer term. The stock’s fate will hinge on how well Trex can navigate this competitive landscape – maintaining its brand leadership without destroying margins – until the structural demand tailwinds kick back in.
Sources:
- Trex Q3 2025 Earnings Press Release and Call Highlights [160] [161]
- Investing.com news on analyst downgrades (BofA, Deutsche, etc.) [162] [163]
- William Blair commentary via SeekingAlpha [164] [165]
- GuruFocus and Finviz data on financials and technicals [166] [167]
- Trex 2023 Sustainability Report (ESG Today) [168] [169]
- NAHB Remodeling Outlook 2025 [170] [171]
- MarketBeat and Finviz analyst consensus and price targets [172] [173]
References
1. www.streetinsider.com, 2. finviz.com, 3. www.investing.com, 4. www.investing.com, 5. www.investing.com, 6. www.investing.com, 7. www.investing.com, 8. seekingalpha.com, 9. seekingalpha.com, 10. www.investing.com, 11. www.investing.com, 12. www.investing.com, 13. www.investing.com, 14. www.investing.com, 15. www.gurufocus.com, 16. www.gurufocus.com, 17. www.gurufocus.com, 18. www.gurufocus.com, 19. www.investing.com, 20. www.marketbeat.com, 21. finviz.com, 22. finviz.com, 23. www.investing.com, 24. seekingalpha.com, 25. seekingalpha.com, 26. finviz.com, 27. www.marketscreener.com, 28. www.nahb.org, 29. www.nahb.org, 30. www.esgtoday.com, 31. www.esgtoday.com, 32. www.esgtoday.com, 33. www.esgtoday.com, 34. seekingalpha.com, 35. www.streetinsider.com, 36. finviz.com, 37. finviz.com, 38. finviz.com, 39. www.investing.com, 40. finviz.com, 41. finviz.com, 42. finviz.com, 43. www.investing.com, 44. www.businesswire.com, 45. www.businesswire.com, 46. www.investing.com, 47. www.investing.com, 48. www.investing.com, 49. www.investing.com, 50. www.investing.com, 51. www.investing.com, 52. www.investing.com, 53. www.investing.com, 54. www.investing.com, 55. www.businesswire.com, 56. www.businesswire.com, 57. www.businesswire.com, 58. www.businesswire.com, 59. www.businesswire.com, 60. www.investing.com, 61. www.marketscreener.com, 62. www.businesswire.com, 63. www.businesswire.com, 64. www.investing.com, 65. www.investing.com, 66. www.investing.com, 67. www.investing.com, 68. www.investing.com, 69. www.investing.com, 70. www.investing.com, 71. seekingalpha.com, 72. seekingalpha.com, 73. seekingalpha.com, 74. seekingalpha.com, 75. www.investing.com, 76. www.investing.com, 77. www.investing.com, 78. www.investing.com, 79. www.investing.com, 80. finviz.com, 81. www.marketbeat.com, 82. finviz.com, 83. www.marketbeat.com, 84. www.marketscreener.com, 85. www.marketbeat.com, 86. seekingalpha.com, 87. seekingalpha.com, 88. www.investing.com, 89. www.investing.com, 90. www.gurufocus.com, 91. www.gurufocus.com, 92. www.businesswire.com, 93. www.businesswire.com, 94. www.businesswire.com, 95. www.businesswire.com, 96. www.businesswire.com, 97. www.businesswire.com, 98. www.businesswire.com, 99. www.businesswire.com, 100. seekingalpha.com, 101. www.businesswire.com, 102. www.businesswire.com, 103. www.businesswire.com, 104. www.marketbeat.com, 105. www.businesswire.com, 106. www.businesswire.com, 107. finviz.com, 108. www.businesswire.com, 109. finviz.com, 110. www.gurufocus.com, 111. finviz.com, 112. finviz.com, 113. finviz.com, 114. finviz.com, 115. finviz.com, 116. finviz.com, 117. www.gurufocus.com, 118. www.marketbeat.com, 119. finviz.com, 120. www.marketbeat.com, 121. finviz.com, 122. www.investing.com, 123. www.gurufocus.com, 124. www.investing.com, 125. www.investing.com, 126. revenuenprofit.substack.com, 127. revenuenprofit.substack.com, 128. www.nahb.org, 129. finviz.com, 130. www.marketscreener.com, 131. finviz.com, 132. www.investing.com, 133. www.businesswire.com, 134. www.investing.com, 135. www.esgtoday.com, 136. www.esgtoday.com, 137. www.esgtoday.com, 138. www.esgtoday.com, 139. www.esgtoday.com, 140. www.esgtoday.com, 141. de.finance.yahoo.com, 142. uk.finance.yahoo.com, 143. www.esgtoday.com, 144. www.esgtoday.com, 145. www.esgtoday.com, 146. www.esgtoday.com, 147. www.esgtoday.com, 148. www.esgtoday.com, 149. www.gurufocus.com, 150. www.investing.com, 151. seekingalpha.com, 152. www.trex.com, 153. www.esgtoday.com, 154. www.esgtoday.com, 155. www.investing.com, 156. www.clearestimates.com, 157. www.nahb.org, 158. www.nahb.org, 159. seekingalpha.com, 160. www.investing.com, 161. www.investing.com, 162. www.investing.com, 163. www.investing.com, 164. seekingalpha.com, 165. seekingalpha.com, 166. www.gurufocus.com, 167. finviz.com, 168. www.esgtoday.com, 169. www.esgtoday.com, 170. www.nahb.org, 171. www.nahb.org, 172. www.marketbeat.com, 173. finviz.com
