VTI vs. SCHB on November 18, 2025: What’s Moving Vanguard’s Total‑Market ETF Today—and Which “Total Stock” Fund Has the Edge?

• Today’s market tone is risk‑off ahead of Nvidia earnings and amid tech‑valuation jitters; volatility spiked and U.S. futures pointed lower in early trade. That backdrop weighed on broad‑market ETFs like VTI. Reuters
• VTI’s tape today: the ETF was ‑1.04% on Monday, ‑2.11% over 5 days, yet +15% year‑to‑date, with $170M of net inflows over five sessions. Top weights remain NVDA (~7.1%), AAPL (~6.1%), and MSFT (~5.9%). TipRanks
• VTI and SCHB both deliver total‑U.S. stock market exposure at 0.03%, but they track different indexes (CRSP vs. Dow Jones Broad), differ in holdings count (≈3,529 vs. 2,438) and scale (AUM ~$565B vs. ~$37.2B). Nasdaq
• SCHB underwent a 3‑for‑1 split on Oct. 10, 2024, making per‑share pricing lower without changing value—handy context for chart readers. Schwab Brokerage
• Strategically, the funds are near‑twins for long‑term, buy‑and‑hold investors; VTI’s larger footprint can mean tighter spreads/deeper liquidity, while SCHB’s index/holdings set is only slightly narrower. FinancialContent

1) What’s moving VTI today (Nov 18, 2025)

Wall Street’s tone turned defensive into Tuesday as tech‑valuation concerns, a deepening crypto drawdown, and anticipation of Nvidia’s quarterly results stoked the highest VIX in about a month. U.S. benchmarks finished almost 1% lower on Monday and futures stayed soft before the open. That macro mix is the dominant driver for broad beta ETFs like VTI today. Reuters

Within the fund, mega‑cap tech remains the swing factor: Nvidia, Apple, and Microsoft are VTI’s top weights, so any pre‑earnings repositioning or AI‑bubble worries tend to ripple through the ETF. TipRanks’ daily snapshot also flags $170M of 5‑day net inflows, suggesting some investors used weakness to add exposure despite short‑term pressure. TipRanks

Separately, policy signals remain mixed: fresh U.S. economic releases revive debate inside the Federal Reserve over the path of rates—a macro variable that often sets the near‑term tone for broad‑market ETFs. Reuters

2) VTI vs. SCHB: Near‑identical core exposure, subtle differences

Two highly regarded “own‑the‑market” ETFs, Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) and Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB), are both ultra‑low‑cost (0.03% expense ratio) and market‑cap weighted—but they use different blueprints:

• Index tracked
  • VTI:CRSP US Total Market Index, spanning virtually the entire investable U.S. equity universe. Etf
  • SCHB:Dow Jones U.S. Broad Stock Market Index, a slightly narrower (but still expansive) slice. Schwab Brokerage
• Holdings & breadth
  • VTI: ~3,529 stocks (more micro/small‑cap names at the margin). Nasdaq
  • SCHB:2,438 holdings as of Nov 18, 2025. Schwab Brokerage
• Scale & liquidity
  • VTI AUM: about $565B (ETF.com), supporting very deep liquidity and typically tight spreads. Etf
  • SCHB AUM: about $37.2B (Schwab, as of Nov 17, 2025), ample for most retail orders. Schwab Brokerage

Bottom line: For long‑term, broad U.S. equity exposure, both are excellent and historically move almost in lockstep. VTI’s extra reach into micro/small caps and sheer size offer incremental diversification and tradability advantages, but performance and risk have been extremely close over time—making either fund a solid core holding. FinancialContent

3) Today’s quick compare (updated with latest disclosed figures)

Sources: Vanguard/ETF.com, Schwab, Motley Fool/Nasdaq syndication, TipRanks daily snapshot. TipRanks

4) How to choose between them (actionable guidance)

• You prize max breadth & liquidity →VTI. It reaches slightly further down the market‑cap spectrum and carries far more assets—useful for very large orders or for tax‑loss harvesting pairs with SCHB (and vice‑versa). FinancialContent
• You keep it in the Schwab ecosystem →SCHB. Identical fee, nearly identical performance, and seamless integration if you prefer Schwab’s platform. Note the 3‑for‑1 split (Oct. 10, 2024)—handy for smaller ticket sizes and options strikes. Schwab Brokerage
• You’re a long‑term buy‑and‑hold investor →Either. Recent comparative pieces stress how close these funds are on cost, yield, beta, and trailing returns; your brokerage, automation, and taxes often matter more than tiny portfolio differences. Nasdaq

5) Market context and what’s next

• Near term: Tech sentiment, Nvidia’s results, and rate expectations are dictating day‑to‑day beta moves. Elevated volatility may keep broad‑market ETFs choppy in the very short run. Reuters
• Tactical view: One new note upgraded VTI on Nov 18 on the idea that a “November shakeout” can set up a year‑end rally—a seasonal pattern the author argues still has room to play out. As always, that’s an opinion piece (not a guarantee), but it reflects today’s debate on timing entries into broad beta. Seeking Alpha

6) Editor’s note on figures that differ by source

You may see higher AUM figures for “VTI” in some commentary that aggregate the ETF with its mutual‑fund share classes. For ETF‑only AUM, specialized data outlets and fund profiles peg VTI around $0.55–0.57T in late 2025, while SCHB sits near $37B. Always check whether a source is quoting ETF units only or combined share classes. Etf

Sources & further reading (today, Nov 18, 2025)

• What’s driving VTI today:TipRanks Daily Snapshot (11/18/2025) with performance, flows and top holdings. TipRanks
• Deep‑dive comparison:MarketMinute on VTI vs SCHB (Nov 17) and Motley Fool (syndicated on Nasdaq) highlighting fees, holdings counts, and why they’re near‑interchangeable for most investors. FinancialContent
• Official fund pages:Schwab SCHB profile (live holdings/AUM, split disclosure). ETF.comVTI profile for ETF‑only AUM and index. Schwab Brokerage
• Macro today:Reuters Morning Bid sets the day’s cross‑asset tone (tech jitters, NVDA focus, VIX). Fed policy divide piece for rate‑path context. Reuters
• Opinion today:Seeking Alpha (Nov 18) upgrade on VTI, citing seasonal tailwinds. Seeking Alpha

This article is for information only and not investment advice. All market data and fund statistics are as cited from the sources above on Nov 18, 2025.