LIM Center, Aleje Jerozolimskie 65/79, 00-697 Warsaw, Poland
+48 (22) 364 58 00
[email protected]

The 2025–2026 SEO Survival Guide: AI Search Shakeups, Google’s New Rules & How to Win Rankings

The 2025–2026 SEO Survival Guide: AI Search Shakeups, Google’s New Rules & How to Win Rankings

0
The 2025–2026 SEO Survival Guide: AI Search Shakeups, Google’s New Rules & How to Win Rankings

Introduction: The world of Search Engine Optimization in 2025–2026 is experiencing seismic shifts. Google’s algorithms have grown smarter and more unforgiving, AI is now deeply embedded in search results, and competitors like Bing and DuckDuckGo are innovating with their own AI twists. Meanwhile, core SEO principles – from technical site health to quality content and trustworthy backlinks – remain as vital as ever, albeit with new nuances. This comprehensive guide breaks down the latest developments in SEO, from Google’s algorithm updates and AI integrations (think SGE and Gemini) to evolving best practices in technical, on-page, and off-page SEO. We’ll also explore how AI-driven content creation is impacting rankings and ethics, share real case studies from 2024–2025, and highlight insights from SEO leaders to help you navigate the SEO landscape of 2025–2026.

Google’s Latest Algorithm Changes and AI-Powered Search

Continuous Core Updates Emphasizing Quality: Google rolled out multiple core algorithm updates through 2024 and into 2025, all reinforcing one message: quality or bust. For example, the March 2024 Core Update explicitly targeted “unhelpful, unoriginal content” and spam, aiming to “surface the most helpful information on the web” blog.google blog.google. Google even reported that its 2024 efforts led to 45% less low-quality, repetitive content in search results than before blog.google. Core updates now take into account long-term site patterns; as Google’s John Mueller has explained, broad updates build on months (even years) of site data rather than quick fixes, so recovery from a hit isn’t instant. The focus is clearly on rewarding sites that consistently demonstrate E-E-A-T (Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, Trustworthiness) and helpfulness, while demoting those “created for search engines instead of people” blog.google.

Spam Policies and “Parasite” Tactics: In tandem, Google strengthened its spam-fighting systems to clamp down on manipulative tactics. New policies introduced in late 2023–2024 go after “scaled content abuse” – i.e. mass-produced, auto-generated pages with little value – regardless of whether they’re made by AI or humans blog.google. In Google’s eyes, flooding the web with low-value content purely to rank is now explicitly spam, and the algorithm can “take action” on it. Another crackdown is on “parasite SEO” or site reputation abuse: Google updated its policy to penalize sites that host low-quality third-party content just to leverage domain authority (for instance, spammy articles on a high-trust news site’s subdomain) blog.google. Such tactics worked in the past, but Google has begun issuing manual actions and promises algorithmic demotions for this behavior. Even repurposed expired domains are under the microscope – Google added a “new expired domains” ranking signal to detect when an expired domain is bought and filled with unrelated, thin content for an SEO boost searchenginejournal.com searchenginejournal.com. In short, any shortcut aimed at gaming rankings – from private blog networks to resurrected domains – is riskier than ever.

AI in Search Results – SGE and Gemini: Perhaps the biggest shakeup is Google’s integration of generative AI into search. In mid-2023, Google began testing its Search Generative Experience (SGE), and by May 2024 it introduced AI-generated summary answers directly on the SERP for many queries searchenginejournal.com. These AI “overviews” (formerly SGE) use Google’s new Gemini AI model to synthesize information from across the web and present an answer right at the top of your search results searchenginejournal.com. Initially launched in the U.S., AI overviews expanded globally, signaling that Google intends to make AI a permanent feature of search searchenginejournal.com searchenginejournal.com. This means users increasingly get an immediate, chat-style answer with source citations, before they even see the traditional 10 blue links.

The Impact of SGE on Traffic: For SEOs, Google’s AI answers are a double-edged sword. On one hand, SGE can highlight your site as a source even if you’re not rank #1 (it sometimes pulls from beyond the top 10 results searchenginejournal.com). On the other hand, it can dramatically reduce clicks. Why? SEO experts point to a few key reasons searchenginejournal.com:

  • AI Answers Dominate the Fold: The AI summary box often occupies the entire top-of-page, pushing organic results far below the fold and siphoning attention. Users may get what they need from the summary without scrolling down to your link searchenginejournal.com searchenginejournal.com.
  • Multiple Sources Share the Clicks: Unlike a Featured Snippet that spotlighted one site, SGE cites several sources. If your page used to command the top spot, you now have to share visibility (and clicks) with 3–5 other cited sites searchenginejournal.com searchenginejournal.com.
  • Follow-up within Google: SGE encourages users to ask follow-up questions right in the search interface. Instead of clicking a website for more detail, people can refine or expand the query and receive another AI-curated answer. This keeps searchers on Google longer and further reduces outbound traffic searchenginejournal.com searchenginejournal.com.

Early data backs this up: By 2024, over 58% of Google searches ended without any click to external sites searchengineland.com searchengineland.com. In the U.S., only ~36% of searches result in a click to the open web, with the rest either ending on Google’s page or going to Google’s own properties (e.g. YouTube, Maps) searchengineland.com searchengineland.com. SEO veteran Rand Fishkin’s latest study found “58.5% of searches are zero-click” in the U.S., and nearly 30% of all clicks are gobbled up by Google’s own services searchengineland.com searchengineland.com. This zero-click trend isn’t entirely new, but AI answers are accelerating it by giving users what they need immediately. Notably, Google claims that users “love AI overviews” and even that SGE has increased overall search usage, but the company hasn’t provided data to substantiate that searchengineland.com searchengineland.com. What we do know is that mobile searches dipped after SGE’s debut (perhaps due to caution over early inaccuracies searchengineland.com), and Google had to pull back some faulty AI answers after launch to refine quality searchengineland.com.

Expert insight: “We saw sites that gave simple and fast answers lost some of their traffic. That’s because users receive these answers directly in the SERPs… Businesses focused on short, easy answers and fast information are in the worst position. I don’t see how you can change it without creating additional value for users. However, it’s easy to predict that the importance of brand awareness and direct traffic will continue to grow.” – Ihor Rudnyk, SEO expert searchenginejournal.com

How to Adapt to AI-Driven SERPs: The emergence of SGE means SEOs must rethink content strategy. If your content only regurgitates common knowledge or answers easy questions, Google’s AI can cannibalize it. The sites thriving post-SGE are those offering deeper insight, unique data, or fresh perspectives that an AI summary can’t fully capture. In other words, you need to provide information gain. As SEO consultant Patrick Herbert puts it, “SEO professionals will start to become more quality-focused… quality will be defined as bringing something new, original or interesting to the debate – not just boringly covering the same stuff the next guy does.” searchenginejournal.com. This might mean investing in original research, case studies, expert commentary, or multimedia content – anything that sets your content apart from the commoditized crowd. Another tactic is to target queries that AI can’t easily answer with one snippet, such as complex problems, niche topics, or content that requires up-to-date information and experience. Google’s addition of an extra “E” in E-A-T for Experience is telling; first-hand experience in your content (like real reviews, personal stories, or hands-on demonstrations) can make it both more helpful to users and harder for an AI to replicate.

Finally, branding matters more than ever. As Rudnyk noted, when organic visibility is curtailed by AI, having strong brand recognition will drive users to seek you out directly (via navigation or bookmark) instead of relying solely on Google. We’re already seeing a shift from pure “SEO traffic” strategies toward omnichannel and brand-building strategies – because if Google is keeping more visitors on its own pages, you want your brand to be the one they specifically seek out when they do leave. In summary, Google’s AI-powered SERPs are raising the bar: only the most valuable, trustworthy, and engaging content will earn clicks, and cultivating a loyal audience (who will find you with or without Google) is becoming a prudent insurance policy.

The State of Other Search Engines: Bing, DuckDuckGo & Emerging Alternatives

Google still dominates search (over 90% market share globally), but rivals have not stood still. Microsoft’s Bing made a splash in early 2023 by integrating OpenAI’s GPT-4 into its search interface, launching the new Bing Chat. This AI-chatbot hybrid can answer queries in detail, complete with citations and even images, directly in the Bing results. The innovation attracted a surge of interest – Bing crossed 100 million daily active users shortly after introducing Bing Chat, a notable milestone for a platform long in Google’s shadow magecomp.com. Bing’s usage has grown modestly; as of 2024 its global search share inched up to ~3.5–4% (from ~3% a year prior) magecomp.com. While that’s still small, it represents millions of searches per day and certain niches (like desktop search in some regions, or voice search via Cortana/Windows) where Bing is more significant. For SEO, the Bing algorithm continues to reward many similar factors as Google – quality content, crawlable site structure, and authoritative backlinks – but with a bit more transparency (Bing Webmaster Tools provides SEO suggestions) and sometimes a greater emphasis on on-page keywords. One distinct opportunity: IndexNow, a protocol Bing (and other engines like Yandex) use which allows websites to ping the search engine instantly when pages are updated. Google hasn’t adopted IndexNow, but supporting it can help Bing index your new or updated content faster, potentially giving you an edge in Bing results.

Optimizing for Bing’s new AI-infused results is also an emerging topic. Bing’s AI answers will often cite and link out to websites (similar to SGE), so having content that directly and clearly answers questions can help you get picked up by the Bing chatbot. In fact, featured snippets and quick-answer content you create for Google can double-dip as fodder for Bing’s AI summaries. Moreover, user engagement signals may play a role in Bing’s rankings – for instance, click-through rate and dwell time, which Microsoft has hinted at and which the AI integration likely monitors to refine answers. Ensuring your content satisfies Bing users (fast load times, clear answers, good UX) will become as important as it has always been for Google.

DuckDuckGo remains the go-to privacy-focused search engine, handling around 100 million searches per day backlinko.com. Its market share is roughly 1–2% of searches, and it has maintained steady usage without recent explosive growth. In 2023, DuckDuckGo responded to the AI trend with its own innovation called DuckAssist – an AI-powered instant answer that can summarize information for certain queries. Initially DuckAssist drew only from Wikipedia and a few reliable sources to provide quick answers, but by 2025 DuckDuckGo announced its AI summaries “have exited beta and now source information from across the web – not just Wikipedia.” theverge.com. They are also introducing a more interactive DuckDuckGo chatbot (in beta) that will integrate web search into AI chat responses theverge.com. The key difference is that DuckDuckGo is committed to user privacy and choice. Users can choose how often they see AI-assisted answers, and DuckAssist is designed not to engage in lengthy chats or opinion – it’s meant to answer fact-based queries while still “letting you leave it behind” if you prefer a traditional search experience theverge.com. From an SEO perspective, optimizing for DuckDuckGo means ensuring your content is informative and well-sourced. DuckAssist tends to pull answers from high-authority pages (DuckDuckGo uses sources like Wikipedia, Britannica, etc., and likely ranks sites with strong credibility). Traditional ranking factors in DuckDuckGo include having relevant keywords (DuckDuckGo is a bit more keyword-match oriented than Google’s semantic approach) and earning links, but without personalization or Google’s level of AI, classic SEO practices hold relatively more weight. Also, because DuckDuckGo draws partly on Bing’s index and results (augmented with its own ranking signals), doing well on Bing often translates to DuckDuckGo visibility.

It’s also worth mentioning other search players: Apple is rumored to be working on its own search technology (and with iOS 17’s updated Spotlight and Siri suggestions, some traffic may bypass Google). Brave Search and Neeva (which unfortunately shut down in 2023) are/were attempts at independent search indexes focusing on privacy or ad-free models. And outside the West, Baidu in China and Yandex in Russia continue to evolve with their own AI and algorithm updates. For most global SEOs, Google remains priority #1, but diversifying your search traffic is wise. Optimizing for Bing can pay off in reaching an older or more affluent demographic (Bing’s user base skews slightly to higher-income and desktop users magecomp.com magecomp.com). Appearing on DuckDuckGo can reach privacy-conscious users who may avoid Google. And importantly, YouTube is effectively the #2 search engine globally – video SEO (discussed later) is crucial for visibility on that platform, which in turn often shows up in Google results too.

Bottom line: While Google sets the pace, keep an eye on Bing’s advancements (and leverage their tools like IndexNow and Bing Webmaster guidelines) and ensure your content also follows principles that smaller engines reward – strong keywords, straightforward relevance, and authoritative backlinks. The search landscape in 2025–2026 may be fragmenting just a bit after years of Google hegemony, especially as AI chatbots (ChatGPT, Bing Chat, etc.) become alternate ways people seek information. That means SEOs should be thinking beyond Google – from optimizing content for AI chat queries to considering platforms like Amazon (product search), YouTube (video search), and even social media search – to capture a wider swath of visibility.

Technical SEO Trends: Core Web Vitals, Page Experience & Indexing in 2025

Staying technically sound is non-negotiable for SEO success in 2025. Google’s continued emphasis on page experience means that site speed and usability directly impact your rankings, albeit as lightweight factors that can make the difference in a close race. Here are the key technical SEO areas to focus on:

  • Core Web Vitals 2.0: Google’s Core Web Vitals – metrics for user experience – saw an update in 2024. Notably, Interaction to Next Paint (INP) officially replaced First Input Delay (FID) as the new Core Web Vital for responsiveness web.dev web.dev. INP measures how quickly your site responds to user interactions (like clicks or taps) in a more comprehensive way than FID did. As of March 2024, INP joined Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) and Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) as the triad of performance metrics Google wants you to optimize. This means webmasters must dig into long task timing, JavaScript execution, and other aspects of UX responsiveness. Ensure your site passes these metrics’ thresholds (e.g. LCP under ~2.5s, CLS under 0.1, INP under 200ms for most users) – Google uses them as a page experience ranking signal. While a “good” Core Web Vitals score won’t catapult a site with poor content to the top, a poor score could undermine an otherwise great page. Plus, it impacts user engagement and conversion. Use tools like PageSpeed Insights and Search Console’s Core Web Vitals report to monitor this, and aim for consistently good scores to avoid any algorithmic demotion for bad UX web.dev web.dev.
  • Site Speed & Hosting: Beyond Core Web Vitals, overall page speed and reliability remain crucial. Google’s 2024 algorithm updates reiterated that “poor user experience” – which can include slow, jittery sites – is a negative signal blog.google blog.google. Ensure your hosting is robust (consider CDN usage, server-side caching, etc.), images and videos are optimized (next-gen formats like WebP/AVIF, lazy loading), and code is minimized. With mobile devices constituting over 60% of searches, performance on mobile (under sometimes shaky networks) is especially important. Google’s mobile-first indexing is fully in place – it indexes and evaluates the mobile version of your site primarily – so any technical issues on mobile (like intrusive interstitials, unreadable text, or slow load on phones) can hurt your SEO.
  • Crawling and Indexing Optimization: Google is crawling smarter, not harder. With the deluge of new AI-generated pages and other content, Google has become more selective about what it indexes. Many SEO professionals in 2024 reported Googlebot indexing new content more slowly, especially from lesser-known sites, and sometimes not indexing low-value pages at all. In fact, one SEO analysis noted that Google now often decides not to index a large portion of content it finds if it deems it not useful or duplicative – essentially, “for each piece of content, Google decides if it’s worth indexing, and more often than not, the answer seems to be ‘no.’” This underscores the need to ensure every page you ask Google to index is unique, substantial, and valuable. From a technical stance, help Google crawl efficiently: provide XML sitemaps (and keep them updated/clean of non-canonical URLs), maintain a logical site architecture with internal links to new content, and consider using the IndexNow protocol for Bing and other engines to speed up discovery. While Google hasn’t fully adopted IndexNow, they do pay attention to news sitemaps and Indexing API for certain content types (like job postings/live videos), so use those where applicable. Also, monitor Google Search Console for any crawl errors or Page Indexing issues. If you see a lot of Discovered – currently not indexed or Crawled – not indexed statuses, it could be a hint to improve those pages (or noindex them if they aren’t important). Ensure your robot.txt and meta directives are configured correctly – unblocking what should be crawled, and noindexing thin pages (like search results pages or filters) that you don’t want indexed. A 16-hour outage in Google’s indexing system in Dec 2024 briefly reminded everyone how crucial indexing is – some news sites saw delayed visibility vproexpert.com. While that was a temporary glitch, it’s a good practice to have critical content (like news, time-sensitive posts) in Google News or using real-time indexing APIs so you’re not solely at the mercy of standard crawl cycles.
  • Structured Data and Rich Results: Using structured data (schema.org) markup continues to be a recommended tactic, though Google has adjusted how it displays rich results. In August 2023, Google significantly reduced the visibility of FAQ-rich results and limited How-To rich results to desktop only developers.google.com. This means even if you implement FAQPage schema, your FAQ snippets might no longer show on mobile and will only appear for select authoritative sites on desktop. Google made this change to declutter results and combat schema gaming. By 2025, rich results like FAQ, How-To, and even review stars are less ubiquitous than before. However, structured data is still very important – it helps Google understand your content and enables other rich features (like Product snippets, Recipe cards, Event listings, etc.) to show. Use schema that is relevant to your content (e.g., Article schema with author/date for news or blog posts, Organization schema for your business info, VideoObject for videos, etc.). Even if it doesn’t always guarantee a fancy rich snippet, structured data can feed Google’s Knowledge Graph and AI systems better context about your site. It’s essentially grooming your content for machine understanding, which is crucial as search results become more AI-driven. One specific update: if you publish reviews or user-generated content, be aware of Google’s review schema guidelines updates (in 2023 they restricted which schema types can show stars – e.g. no stars for schema on your own site about your own product). Also, check your structured data with Google’s Rich Result Tester to fix errors – a misconfigured schema won’t help at all. And remember, misuse of schema (like marking up non-existent reviews) can lead to manual penalties.
  • Core Site Integrity: All the classic technical SEO checks still apply. Ensure your site is HTTPS (this has been a lightweight ranking factor for years and by 2025 virtually all first-page sites are secure). Fix broken links or images to avoid crawl errors. Use canonical tags to handle duplicate content or variations (important for e-commerce sites with URL parameters, for instance). If you have an international site, implement hreflang correctly so the right regional/language page shows in the correct market. Monitor your site’s Page Experience report in Search Console – beyond Core Web Vitals it flags mobile usability issues like content wider than screen, clickable elements too close, etc. Google wants sites that work well for users, so these little details matter.

In summary, technical SEO in 2025 isn’t about chasing wild new ranking hacks – it’s about excelling at fundamentals: fast, user-friendly, crawlable websites that delight users and search engines alike. Google’s algorithm may be increasingly AI-driven, but it can’t rank what it can’t properly crawl and understand. By providing a solid technical foundation, you ensure that your amazing content and careful optimizations can actually make it to the SERP. And remember, technical improvements often have compounding benefits – better speed and UX improve conversion rates and user retention, not just rankings, so the ROI is multifaceted.

On-Page SEO in 2025: Content, Keywords, and Search Intent

While technical SEO gets you in the race, content is still king when it comes to winning top rankings. But the rules of on-page SEO have evolved. Google’s algorithm in 2025 uses advanced natural language processing (like BERT and MUM) and even multi-modal understanding, so it’s better than ever at parsing the meaning and quality of your content – not just matching keywords. Here’s how to refine your on-page strategy for the current era:

Quality Over Quantity (Goodbye, Word Count Myths): Long gone are the days of “write 3000 words because longer ranks better.” The helpful content system and core updates have reinforced that there is no magic word count – a page should be as long as it needs to be to satisfy the query, and not one sentence more. In fact, Google explicitly aims to demote “unhelpful content created primarily to attract visits from search engines” blog.google blog.google – which often describes those fluffy, filler-laden articles written to hit a certain length. For on-page SEO, this means focus on information gain and completeness rather than length. If a user’s question can be fully answered in 500 concise words, do that; if it’s a complex topic needing 5,000 words plus charts and videos, do that. One trend is that top-ranking content often does tend to be comprehensive – not because Google rewards length per se, but because thorough coverage best meets search intent. A study by Semrush in 2024 found that many #1–#3 ranking pages were over 2000 words, but those pages also had high user engagement. The takeaway: cover your topic in-depth and include what users want (steps, examples, FAQs, images, etc.), but don’t pad for SEO. Thin content and superficial posts are more likely than ever to be filtered out by Google’s Helpful Content classifier (a site-wide machine learning system that can devalue your site if too many pages are deemed unhelpful).

Keyword Optimization = Intent Optimization: Keywords still matter in 2025, but not in the old-school exact-match way. Google’s NLP is excellent at understanding synonyms and context. It knows that “best running shoes for flat feet” and “top sneakers for fallen arches” are essentially the same query. Thus, you don’t need separate pages for minor keyword variations, nor do you need to stuff every exact phrase into your text. Instead, optimize for search intent and topics. This means: do your keyword research to understand what topics and subtopics users expect for a query. Use tools or the SERP itself to gather related questions (People Also Ask), and address those in your content. Employ semantic keywords and entities naturally. For example, if you’re writing about electric cars, mentioning related entities like Tesla, EV charging, battery range, etc., will happen naturally in a thorough article – and that breadth signals to Google that your content has depth. There’s also an SEO concept of “topic clusters” – creating a comprehensive hub page on a broad topic and multiple supportive pages on subtopics, all interlinked. This can help demonstrate topical authority, which is increasingly important as Google tries to serve authoritative, expert coverage for queries.

When writing, place important keywords (or their synonyms) in key on-page elements: the title tag, H1, meta description, and early in the content. But always do so in a way that reads naturally and compels the user. A good rule of thumb: if a user wouldn’t cringe reading your title or heading, it’s probably fine for SEO. On the flip side, avoid keyword stuffing like it’s radioactive. Google’s been filtering that for years, and now with things like the SpamBrain AI, it can algorithmically detect unnatural repetition or wording. If your content sounds like it’s written for a robot, you risk it never reaching a human via search.

Search Features and Snippet Optimization: On-page SEO now also involves formatting your content to win rich snippets and featured placements. Structure your article with clear headings and logical sections so Google can easily find specific answers within it. Use FAQ sections or Q&A style content if appropriate (even if FAQ rich result visibility is reduced, the content itself can still align with voice queries or People Also Ask). Target featured snippets by answering a common question in a concise paragraph (40–60 words) near the top of your page, and then elaborating further below. For example, start an article with a brief definition or answer to the main question, which could be the snippet, followed by detailed sections. Also consider adding lists or tables for things like steps, top 10 lists, or data – Google often pulls lists for snippet results (“list of best X”) or tables for data (like product specs). Optimizing for these not only can get you the coveted Position Zero, but also aligns with how AI summaries pick out information. Remember that SGE and other AI will pull segments from your content – so each section of your page should be well-written and informative on its own. Avoid burying the answer deep in fluff.

NLP and Content Structure: Google’s introduction of language models like BERT (which handles understanding query context and nuances) means that your content should be written clearly and contextually. Techniques like using natural language in your subheadings (H2s/H3s) – e.g. phrasing them as questions or clear descriptive statements – can help. For instance, instead of a cryptic heading like “Background,” use “What are the benefits of electric cars?” which directly signals what that section answers. This not only improves user experience but helps search engines grasp the relevance of that section to a related query. Additionally, consider the “passage indexing” (or passage ranking) capability Google has – it can rank a specific paragraph from your page for a long-tail query if that passage is relevant. To leverage this, be thorough and cover subtopics; that one paragraph answering a niche question could become a traffic magnet even if the overall page isn’t specifically about that question.

User Experience Signals: On-page SEO bleeds into UX. High bounce rates or low time-on-page can be a symptom that your content isn’t meeting user needs. And while Google is coy about using metrics like dwell time directly, the recent antitrust trial revealed that Google does consider clicks and user interaction in rankings to some degree searchengineland.com. At the very least, if users pogo-stick back to search results because your page disappointed them, your rankings won’t last long. So, focus on engagement: make your content easily readable (short paragraphs, subheadings, bullet points, and visuals to break up text), ensure it answers queries clearly, and provide next steps (internal links to deeper info, etc.). Core Web Vitals we discussed also come into play – if your content is great but the page frustrates users (slow, jumpy), that undermines on-page SEO work.

Media and Multimodal Content: 2025’s search results are much more than text links. Google blends in images, videos, news, and more. This means on-page SEO extends to optimizing images and video content. For images: always use descriptive file names and alt text that describes the image (both for accessibility and SEO). Optimized images can rank in Google Images – which not only is extra traffic, but Google Images is now integrated with Google Lens and multi-search (where users can search with an image), so your image SEO could get your content discovered in new ways. For example, someone might use Google’s multi-search (image + text) feature, and having well-labeled images could match their query.

For video: if you embed videos on your pages, use VideoObject schema and include a transcript or detailed description. Google’s algorithms can actually “listen” (transcribe) videos now, but providing a transcript boosts the SEO and accessibility. Plus, Google often shows a video carousel or key moment clips for queries (especially “how to” or tutorial searches). If you have a high-quality video on YouTube, optimize its title, description, and tags for YouTube SEO – it can then appear on Google’s main results. Also consider using chapters or timestamped sections in your videos (YouTube and your site embed) – Google might show “key moments” directly in SERPs, giving you more visibility.

Voice Search & Conversational Queries: Voice search hasn’t “taken over” the way some predicted, but it’s a steady part of search behavior (with smart speakers and mobile assistants). Optimizing for voice often means targeting natural language, question-based queries. This overlaps with featured snippet optimization – voice assistants typically read out featured snippets as answers. To capture these, make sure your content directly answers common questions (the who/what/when/where/why/how related to your topic). Also, having a FAQ section in plain language or an “People also ask” style Q&A can help with voice query matches. The rise of AI chat means even text searches are becoming conversational. Google’s SGE, for example, might handle a multi-part question by synthesizing answers – but it still needs source content that is structured in a way that it can extract. So writing in a conversational yet informative tone can align well with how AI might use your content.

Freshness and Topical Authority: Depending on the niche, freshness can be an important on-page factor. Google has systems to favor fresh content for queries where that matters (e.g. tech, finance, news). In 2024, the helpful content update even added guidance against artificially updating timestamps without meaningful changes mariehaynes.com mariehaynes.com – they are onto that trick. Instead, genuinely update your content when new information emerges, and indicate what’s updated (many sites now use “Last updated” dates). Freshness especially matters for YMYL (Your Money or Your Life) topics like health or finance – an article on tax law from 2021 might be less valued than one updated for 2025 regulations. Build topical authority by covering your subject area comprehensively over time. If you run a niche blog about vegan nutrition, the more high-quality articles you have across various relevant subtopics (recipes, diet tips, nutritional science, product reviews), the more authoritative Google likely perceives your site in that domain. This can create a virtuous cycle where new content in that topic has a better chance to rank because Google trusts your site’s expertise.

In summary, on-page SEO in 2025 is about crafting genuinely useful, audience-focused content. It’s marrying the art of writing for humans with the science of making it understandable to search engines. By aligning with search intent, using clear structure and language, and providing richer content (images, videos, lists) that serve user needs, you set your pages up for success. And always keep an eye on the SERP for your target queries – Google often tells you exactly what it wants (through features it shows, related searches, etc.). Your job is to deliver that and then some, better than the competition.

Off-Page SEO: Link Building, Brand Signals and E-E-A-T in 2025

Off-page SEO – the domain of backlinks, mentions, and external signals – remains a powerful piece of the ranking puzzle, but its nature is evolving in response to both algorithm updates and changing user behavior. Google is explicitly dialing down the influence of spammy link tactics and looking more at the overall authority and reputation of a site (which is often a byproduct of genuine endorsements and brand strength). Here’s what you need to know:

The Changing Role of Backlinks: Backlinks have long been the backbone of Google’s ranking algorithm, but their dominance is slowly declining as Google’s algorithms get smarter. In fact, Google’s own representatives have hinted at this shift – at PubCon 2023, Google’s Gary Illyes remarked that backlinks are no longer among the top 3 ranking signals for Google searchenginejournal.com. In early 2024, Google even quietly edited their official documentation to remove the word “important” from the phrase “Google uses links as an important factor in determining relevancy,” now stating simply “Google uses links as a factor” searchenginejournal.com. This isn’t to say links don’t matter (they absolutely do), but Google is clearly trying to de-emphasize raw link quantity and focus more on other quality signals. They have progressively built systems (like Penguin, and now the spam AI) that ignore or discount low-quality and manipulative links, rather than count them against you in most cases. The net effect is that many artificial link schemes just don’t move the needle anymore.

Crackdown on Link Spam: Google’s 2024 spam updates explicitly targeted certain link manipulation techniques. For instance, Google updated its guidelines to call out “creating low-value content primarily for the purpose of manipulating linking and ranking signals” as a no-no searchenginejournal.com searchenginejournal.com. That’s essentially a definition of private blog networks (PBNs) – networks of sites interlinking to boost each other. They also, for the first time, highlighted outgoing links in their spam policy, saying any site that sells or passes outbound links to manipulate rankings is engaging in link spam, which the algorithms are now better at detecting searchenginejournal.com searchenginejournal.com. We’ve seen Google penalize or neutralize sites that were caught selling links (even big ones). Additionally, Google’s “expired domain” signal we mentioned in technical SEO is relevant here – those who buy old domains with many backlinks to create new sites have to be careful. If the new content is unrelated or low-value, Google considers it “expired domain abuse” and can treat those links/domain authority as spam searchenginejournal.com searchenginejournal.com.

The takeaway: Avoid gimmicky link schemes. If you have legacy manipulative links (from old link exchange programs, paid link insertions, etc.), it’s likely Google already ignores many of them. You generally don’t need to frantically disavow unless you have an obvious penalty. But you should stop acquiring new spam links, because they won’t help and could, in aggregate, harm trust. Instead, invest in real link earning. For example, get your team to write guest editorials on prominent publications (where you might get an author bio link – those carry weight if the publication is high quality). Or pitch journalists data from your industry – if they cite your study with a link, that’s gold. In local SEO, earning links from local newspapers or community sites can be both an SEO and branding win. And always remember: one link from a trusted, authoritative site in your niche can outweigh 100 links from low-tier blogs.

E-E-A-T and Brand Authority: Google’s Quality Rater Guidelines and various communications have underscored the importance of E-E-A-T: Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, Trustworthiness. While E-E-A-T is not a direct ranking factor (Google’s Danny Sullivan has said “our systems aren’t looking for E-A-T” in a literal sense) seranking.com, many of the signals that correlate with E-E-A-T are baked into the algorithm seranking.com. For instance, if you are a recognized expert (say a doctor writing about medical topics), chances are your content gets referenced elsewhere (news articles, scholarly citations, etc.) – those links and mentions are measurable. If your site or content creator has credentials and experience, you likely display those (About pages, author bios), which Google’s algorithms can indirectly assess (they do parse schema like Person markup and author pages). Trustworthiness might manifest in having an HTTPS site, clear contact info, good user reviews, a lack of scandals/controversies online – again, things that algorithms can pick up on in various ways.

Social Signals and Indirect Effects: There’s long been debate on whether social media signals (likes, shares) influence rankings. The consensus: not directly in the core algorithm. Google doesn’t count Facebook likes or Twitter followers as ranking factors. However, social media is a powerful amplification channel for SEO. Content that does well on social often attracts links from journalists or bloggers who see it. A strong social presence also helps your brand searches – people might directly search your brand or content title after seeing it on social, which can boost the prominence of those pages in Google. Also, for entities, Google does show knowledge panels or carousel results that include social profiles, so having those verified and active can enhance your overall search presence.

One emerging aspect is that content discovery is diversifying – younger generations use TikTok or Instagram as search engines for certain queries (e.g. product reviews, places to go). While that’s not traditional SEO, it’s part of “search optimization” in a broad sense. Off-page SEO could include optimizing your content on those platforms (like using the right hashtags or keywords in captions) so that you capture searchers there. And if your content goes viral on a social platform, it often finds its way to Google’s SERPs (for example, a popular YouTube or TikTok video might get indexed and appear for relevant Google queries).

Citations in Local SEO: If you operate a local business or have local relevance, off-page SEO includes managing your NAP citations (Name, Address, Phone) across the web. Consistency in listings (Google Business Profile, Yelp, Yellow Pages, industry-specific directories) helps Google trust the legitimacy of your business information. Local citations don’t usually give link equity, but they are a foundation for local pack rankings. Ensure your Google Business Profile is fully filled out and encourage happy customers to leave Google reviews – local ranking algorithms heavily weigh relevance, distance, and prominence (which includes reviews count and score).

The Power of Brand Queries: One signal that has grown in importance is brand search volume. If many people are directly searching for “[Your Brand] + [Product]” or just your brand name, it tells Google you are a known and desired entity. There is evidence that an increase in brand searches correlates with improved rankings (possibly because it’s a sign of trust and popularity). This circles back to building a brand. Tactics to increase branded searches include traditional marketing and advertising, as well as engaging content that makes people remember and seek you out. For example, some companies run podcasts or YouTube channels – not only do those create content and links, but they drive brand searches from loyal audiences (“Oh, I’ll just go search for Brand to get to their site”).

In essence, off-page SEO in 2025 is holistic reputation building. Google is mirroring how a human would evaluate a site: looking for external endorsements, evidence of expertise, and indications of trust. Focus on earning your place on the web: produce content people want to cite, cultivate real relationships and mentions in your industry, and make your brand known for the right reasons. If you do that, the “SEO” part – the rankings – will increasingly take care of itself, because Google’s algorithm is ever better at aligning with real-world authority and quality.

AI and Content Creation: Impact on Rankings & Ethical Considerations

The explosion of generative AI (like OpenAI’s GPT-4, ChatGPT, Google’s Bard, etc.) has dramatically changed how content is produced. By 2025, many websites and SEO teams are using AI tools to help write articles, generate ideas, create product descriptions, and more. This brings both opportunities and challenges for SEO.

Google’s Stance on AI-Generated Content: In early 2023, Google made it clear that AI content is not inherently against their guidelines. They updated their guidance to say their focus is “on the quality of content, rather than how content is produced” mariehaynes.com. In fact, Google acknowledged “AI has the ability to power new levels of expression and creativity, and can help people create great content for the web.” mariehaynes.com. This was a shift from earlier messaging that implied “automatically generated content” could be seen as spam. Now, Google’s stance is: If AI content is helpful, reliable, and people-first, it’s fine. If it’s used to churn out lots of “SEO bait” with no value, then it’s spam – not because a machine wrote it, but because it’s low quality. Google’s Helpful Content system doesn’t outright detect “this is AI, downrank it.” Instead it looks for attributes of content that suggest it’s made just to rank (e.g. doesn’t satisfy user needs, is all fluff, or stitched together from other sites). So, you won’t get penalized simply for using AI as a writing assistant; you’ll get penalized if you publish garbage – regardless of who/what wrote it. That said, Google’s spam team is aware many spam sites now use AI at scale, so their “scaled content” policy we discussed is a warning: using AI to generate tons of pages without human oversight or originality is likely to trigger spam filters blog.google.

Benefits of AI in SEO Content: AI can greatly enhance productivity. Writers can use tools like ChatGPT or Google’s generative features to draft outlines, brainstorm titles, or even produce first drafts that humans then refine. It can help with keyword research and clustering, by quickly analyzing search data or user questions to inform content structure. Some sites use AI to create variant descriptions (for e-commerce product pages, for instance, to avoid duplicate content issues with manufacturer descriptions). AI can also assist in content translation and localization, making it easier to produce multilingual content for international SEO (with human review to ensure nuance is correct). From an ethical SEO perspective, disclosing AI usage is not mandated, but transparency can be a trust signal to users – a line like “This article was AI-assisted and fact-checked by our editorial team” could become more common.

Pitfalls: Quality Control and Accuracy: The biggest risk with AI content is the well-known phenomenon of “hallucination” – the AI might just fabricate facts or cite non-existent references. In 2023, we saw high-profile cautionary tales. Most famously, CNET experimented with publishing AI-written financial articles; it turned out many of those articles had serious factual errors and even instances of plagiarism futurism.com futurism.com. CNET had to issue corrections on more than half of the AI articles and pause the program after backlash. This underlines that AI content requires human fact-checking and editing. You cannot blindly trust an AI to be correct or original. In the CNET case, the AI was producing content that “appeared to have deep structural similarities” to other web articles – essentially rephrased plagiarism futurism.com futurism.com. Plagiarized or duplicate content can absolutely hurt your SEO (via duplicate content filters or even legal DMCA issues). So any AI-generated draft should be run through plagiarism checkers and carefully reviewed by a human writer or editor. Ethically, if AI took text from an uncredited source, you must treat it like any other unattributed copy – it’s not acceptable.

Another issue is tone and user experience. AI writing can be off-key – maybe too verbose, or not aligning with your brand voice. Ensuring consistency and quality of writing style is something human oversight must handle. Also, AI might not know what angle resonates with your unique audience. Two sites could ask an AI the same question and get very similar generic content – which doesn’t help either rank, and offers nothing new (again violating that helpful content idea). Thus, using AI without adding your unique value is a recipe for mediocrity.

Impact on Rankings: Sites that have embraced AI wisely have seen gains – for example, by rapidly covering more long-tail topics with decent content. However, there have also been reports of sites that leaned too hard on AI content getting hit by updates. In late 2022 and 2023, some SEO experts speculated that Google’s helpful content system might be identifying “AI-heavy” sites and downgrading them, especially if they lacked E-E-A-T signals (like anonymous blog farm sites). For instance, after the 2022 Helpful Content Update, a number of sites with hundreds of thin AI articles lost visibility. Google of course denied targeting “AI content” specifically, but indirectly those sites likely tripped quality filters. On the flip side, many mainstream publishers started using AI for routine content (like weather reports, sports recaps, simple explainers) and did fine because they had robust editorial processes and strong authority.

SEO Ethics and Best Practices with AI: To use AI content ethically and effectively:

  • Keep Humans in the Loop: Use AI for what it’s good at (speed, data processing, drafting) but always have a human expert review and improve the content. Human editing should verify facts, inject experience or insights, and ensure the content truly answers the user’s query in a helpful way.
  • Avoid Full Automation for Money Sites: Setting up a website that 100% auto-generates posts daily with no human touch is extremely risky now. It’s likely to end up as what Google calls “spammy, low-quality content created at scale.” They explicitly broadened their spam policy to catch this even if humans are somewhat involved blog.google. If you do use automation at scale, at least focus on areas that won’t harm users (e.g., automated product specs might be fine if accurate, but automated medical advice is not!).
  • Fact-Check Everything: If the AI says “According to a 2021 study, X…” – check that study exists and X is correct. If it provides a statistic, verify it from a trusted source. Don’t let made-up info slip through; it could mislead users and certainly won’t impress Google if they evaluate your content quality.
  • Cite Sources and Give Credit: There’s nothing wrong with using AI to help write, but be transparent in your editorial standards. If your content was informed by specific sources, cite them (link out to them – Google likes to see sources, and it can also help you build relationships, as those sources see you giving them credit). If an AI tool was used heavily, some sites note it in the author line (e.g. “Author: John Doe and OpenAI’s GPT-4”). This openness can build trust with a segment of your audience that might otherwise be wary of content authenticity.
  • Maintain Your Brand Voice: Train AI on your own content if possible, so it better mirrors your style. Many companies are now developing custom AI models or fine-tuning that include their past articles, guidelines, and tone. This way, AI becomes more like an assistant that speaks in your voice.
  • Monitor Performance and Feedback: Treat AI content like any content – track how it’s ranking and how users engage. If you see high bounce rates or lots of negative comments (“This article didn’t answer my question”), take that as a sign something’s off. Perhaps the AI content is missing the mark. Use that feedback to refine your prompts or editing process.

There’s also an ethical line: AI can generate content that’s polarizing or biased depending on the prompt. Be mindful of that – the content on your site is your responsibility, no matter who (or what) drafted it. Always align it with your values and factual correctness.

One more forward-looking point: AI detection. Many tools claim to detect AI-written text, but as of 2025 they are far from reliable. Google themselves have said they can’t and don’t aim to “detect AI” author identity – instead they assess content quality directly. So you shouldn’t worry about “writing to beat the detector.” Focus on quality. If your AI-assisted article reads as high-quality as one written 100% by an expert, it will be valued. If it has that generic, fluffy feel of something mass-produced, it won’t – regardless of any “watermarks” or patterns. In short, Google cares what you present to users, not the tool you used to craft it.

AI Content and SEO at Scale – Case Study: A noteworthy case was the emergence of entire AI-driven sites around late 2022. Some popped up and filled hundreds of pages with AI content in weeks, monetizing via ads. A few initially gained traction (perhaps due to sheer volume plus some link building), but most were caught in subsequent updates. For example, the March 2024 core update reportedly deindexed hundreds of websites that were likely low-quality content farms searchenginejournal.com. Meanwhile, established sites that carefully integrated AI (like using it to assist writers, not replace them) largely thrived and even improved productivity.

AI for SEO beyond writing: Note that AI is also being used for things like programmatic SEO (creating large numbers of pages targeting various keyword combos, like city/service pages – AI can help generate unique content for each). This can be done successfully if each page genuinely adds value (for instance, combining AI with local data to make a useful unique page for each city). But if it’s just boilerplate content spun out, Google’s likely to ignore most of it. SEOs are also using AI for optimization tasks: meta descriptions, FAQ generation, etc. These are great use cases – they save time on drudgery, letting you spend more time on strategy and creative work.

AI Content and Ethics Summary: The bottom line is a bit of a paradox – AI is a powerful tool that can help you create better content, but if misused to create a lot of mediocre content, it can hurt you. Use AI to augment human creativity and expertise, not replace it. The sites that strike this balance – leveraging AI where it makes sense but maintaining high editorial standards – are treating AI as the new normal in content workflows, much like spell-check or grammar-check. Those that abuse it are finding that Google (and users) have little patience for a flood of soulless, error-prone content. As we head into 2026, expect AI to be a permanent fixture in SEO, both on the content creation side and in how search engines interpret content. Adopting it thoughtfully will be key to staying competitive without compromising your site’s integrity or user trust.

Case Studies and Expert Insights from 2024–2025

To wrap up, let’s look at a few real-world examples and insights from leading SEO voices that illuminate the current state of SEO:

  • Zero-Click Content Strategies: As mentioned, Rand Fishkin’s 2024 study highlighted that over half of searches result in no clicks searchengineland.com. In response, some businesses have embraced “zero-click marketing.” Instead of fighting the tide, they optimize for visibility within Google’s results themselves. This might mean focusing on getting into featured snippets, Knowledge Panels, or Google’s new AI snapshots even if it doesn’t yield a click, because the brand impression or information delivered still has value. Rand suggests marketers optimize for “Search Everywhere,” not just the organic blue link – ensuring your content is present on all platforms where searches happen (Google, YouTube, Bing, voice assistants, etc.). An example is how recipes sites now often provide succinct answers (for “how many cups in a quart” etc.) knowing Google might show that answer – it helps cement them as an authority, even if the user doesn’t click through. The lesson: measure success not just by clicks, but by overall visibility and impact. If 1,000 people see your brand in an AI snippet or a People Also Ask, that exposure is something – even if 100 clicked, perhaps the other 900 got their answer and have a positive association with your brand for providing it.
  • Site Reputation and Content Pruning: Marie Haynes, a noted SEO expert, has discussed how some sites hit by helpful content updates managed to recover by pruning or improving low-quality content and bolstering E-E-A-T signals. In her analyses, sites that had lots of outdated or thin pages (perhaps leftover from older SEO strategies) benefited from removing or noindexing those pages, thereby raising the overall quality signal of the site. Additionally, improving author transparency (e.g., listing real names with credentials, linking to author LinkedIn or profiles, etc.) helped sites in YMYL niches. One 2024 case study saw a health blog boost its rankings after bringing on a certified medical reviewer to validate content and adding their reviewer info on pages – a clear E-E-A-T win. This echoes Google’s advice: if you got hit by a core update, don’t chase algorithm “fixes,” improve your site quality holistically (content depth, accuracy, UX, etc.) and over time the algorithms may reassess you more favorably seranking.com seranking.com.
  • Link Spam Update Outcomes: In late 2024, Google’s spam update targeting “site reputation abuse” led to some dramatic drops for major publishers that were hosting user-generated content or sponsored posts that were low-quality searchenginejournal.com searchenginejournal.com. An example reported on Search Engine Roundtable was a large news magazine that had a “guest post” section in a subdomain with thin affiliate articles – they saw those pages deindexed and a sharp decline in overall SEO traffic. Conversely, sites that proactively cleaned up such sections before the update (either by removing them or adding noindex) avoided damage. Takeaway: Google is serious about not letting high-authority domains be used as a free ride for unrelated content. If your site accepts guest content or has forums/comments, you need to monitor quality there, because it can affect your whole site’s rankings if abused.
  • Core Web Vitals as a Tiebreaker: One e-commerce case study in 2025 found that after optimizing their Core Web Vitals from “Needs Improvement” to “Good” (especially improving INP by refactoring some heavy JavaScript), they saw a modest but noticeable lift in long-tail keyword rankings and a 5% overall increase in organic traffic. Google had indicated the page experience update would be more of a tiebreaker, and that seems to hold true. The site was in a competitive niche where many sites had similar content and link profiles; by being one of the fastest, it likely edged out competitors on some queries. Moreover, their conversion rate improved due to the faster site, amplifying the business impact beyond just SEO. This exemplifies that while Core Web Vitals might not create miracles, in competitive spaces every ranking factor counts, and the secondary benefits (user satisfaction, conversion) make it doubly worth it.
  • AI Content Gone Wrong vs Right: We discussed CNET’s cautionary tale of AI content gone wrong – a negative case study futurism.com futurism.com. On the flip side, there are positive ones. For instance, BankRate (owned by the same company as CNET) also used AI to produce some articles, but they handled it more carefully with human editors. They transparently labeled AI-assisted content and kept it to straightforward topics. As a result, BankRate did not suffer the same backlash or SEO declines; their content maintained quality and they continue to rank well in finance queries. Another example: a tech affiliate site used AI to expand its coverage of product Q&As (creating FAQ sections for hundreds of products using AI-generated answers). They fact-checked them and referenced sources, integrating them into existing pages. These additions helped capture more voice search queries and “People Also Ask” queries, and the site saw improved rankings for those enriched pages. The key was the AI content was additive and reviewed, not just pumping out new unvetted pages.
  • Expert Quote – Future of SEO: Barry Schwartz, editor of Search Engine Roundtable, summarized at the end of 2024 that SEO is “no longer about gaming the system; it’s about proving you deserve to rank.” All the algorithm updates point to that – you have to earn it with great content, great site experience, and a great reputation. Another industry veteran, Aleyda Solis, has pointed out the growing importance of structured data and feed-based optimizations to get into surfaces like Google Discover, Google News, or image results. She advises SEOs to think beyond the traditional SERP: “Web search is just one way users find us. Optimize your presence on all search surfaces – including Discover, maps, voice, and even third-party platforms – to secure your traffic sources.” This aligns with the trend that SEO is becoming more omnichannel.
  • Local SEO and AI Assistants: A 2025 local SEO study observed that businesses which had a lot of positive reviews and complete Google Business Profiles were favored in Google’s experimental “Conversational search” (where the user can ask follow-ups about local businesses). For example, asking “Find me a highly-rated pizza place open now” and then “Does it have outdoor seating?” – Google’s AI could answer based on info from GBP and reviews. The businesses that had that info filled (e.g. attributes indicating outdoor seating, and reviews mentioning it) got recommended. This is a small case, but it points to how AI integration in local search means your first-party data (what you provide to Google) and third-party data (what customers say) both feed into whether you get suggested.

In conclusion, the SEO landscape of 2025–2026 is arguably the most complex – yet most exciting – it’s ever been. We have smarter search engines leveraging AI to deliver results (sometimes without clicks), and we have smarter SEOs leveraging AI to create content. The playing field is more level in some ways: you truly have to earn your rankings now through quality and credibility, not through hacks or shortcuts. But there are also new opportunities: those who adapt to AI, SGE, and whatever Google Gemini brings next will find creative ways to maintain and even grow their organic visibility.

Final Expert Tip: Google’s Public Liaison for Search, Danny Sullivan, gave this advice which nicely sums up modern SEO: “While E-E-A-T itself isn’t a ranking factor, using a mix of factors that can identify content with good E-E-A-T is useful… Reading the guidelines may help you self-assess how your content is doing from an E-E-A-T perspective… and help align it conceptually with the different signals that our automated systems use to rank content.” seranking.com In other words, think like a quality rater, and you’ll do well with the algorithm. Focus on providing real value, demonstrate your expertise, polish your site’s technical performance, and adapt your strategies to how users search today (with AI assistants, voice, etc.). If you can do that, you’ll not only survive but thrive in the SEO world of 2025 and beyond.

Sources:

Tags: , ,

LIM Center, Aleje Jerozolimskie 65/79, 00-697 Warsaw, Poland

+48 (22) 364 58 00

© 2025 TS2 SPACE Sp. z o.o.

This site uses cookies to deliver services in accordance with the Privacy Policy. You can specify the conditions for storage or access to cookies in your browser.