Ultra Smartwatch Showdown: Apple Watch Ultra 2 vs Garmin Tactix 7 AMOLED vs Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025 Edition)

When it comes to top-of-the-line adventure smartwatches in 2025, three names lead the pack: Apple Watch Ultra 2, Garmin Tactix 7 AMOLED (sometimes dubbed the “Tactix Ultra 2”), and Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra. These “ultra” wearables promise rugged hardware, advanced health tracking, long battery life, and rich features for both athletes and tech enthusiasts. In this detailed comparison, we’ll break down how each watch stacks up in hardware quality, durability, display technology, software experience, fitness tracking, battery endurance, GPS/navigation capabilities, smart features, ecosystem integration, and pricing. We’ll also include insights from experts and early users, plus a look at upcoming models from Apple, Garmin, Samsung and other competitors, to see what the future holds in this fiercely competitive segment.

Design & Durability

Apple Watch Ultra 2: Apple’s Ultra 2 exudes a premium yet rugged design. It retains a 49 mm aerospace-grade titanium case (now offered in both natural and a new black finish) built to withstand extremes apple.com appleinsider.com. It’s certified to EN13319 dive standard and rated WR100 for water resistance (safe to 100 meters) apple.com – meaning it’s scuba-capable up to ~40 m and suitable for serious watersports. The Ultra 2 is also IP6X dust resistant for harsh environments apple.com. An extra orange Action Button on the side provides quick control (e.g. to start workouts or mark waypoints), though some reviewers note it’s easy to press accidentally due to its protrusion dcrainmaker.com dcrainmaker.com. Overall, the build quality is top-notch – sapphire crystal covers the display, and the flat screen design with raised bezel edges helps protect against impacts.

Garmin Tactix 7 AMOLED: The Tactix 7 AMOLED is essentially Garmin’s no-compromise tactical version of its Fenix series, with an emphasis on toughness. It’s a large watch (51 mm case) constructed with a fiber-reinforced polymer body and a diamond-like carbon (DLC) coated titanium bezel, plus a sapphire glass lens, giving it exceptional scratch resistance the5krunner.com. The Tactix meets strict MIL-STD-810 military standards for thermal, shock, and water resistance (rated 10 ATM, good for 100 m) the5krunner.com. In fact, it’s “about as rugged as it gets,” with details like reinforced button guards and a titanium rear cover built for heavy abuse the5krunner.com. This model adds a tactical nylon band and even features like a stealth mode and night-vision goggle compatibility (more on those later) to suit military or extreme outdoor use. Despite its beefy build, users find it comfortable and well-sized for what it is forums.garmin.com. Simply put, the Tactix 7 AMOLED is built like a tank – ideal for those who truly need extreme durability in the field.

Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra: Samsung’s Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024/2025 editions) takes a stylish yet sturdy approach. It comes in a 47 mm titanium case with a sapphire cover glass dcrainmaker.com, similar to the Apple’s use of premium materials. It carries a 10 ATM water resistance (100 m) rating and is tested to the ISO 22810 standard (though Samsung notes sustained 100 m depth is limited to 10 minutes) dcrainmaker.com. In practice it can be used for swimming and even recreational diving, but its diving credentials aren’t as formally established as Apple’s EN13319 certification dcrainmaker.com. The Watch Ultra also meets MIL-STD-810H for durability (as Samsung’s recent watches do), protecting against drops, extreme temperatures, and vibration. Samsung includes a new rotating “Quick” button (an orange button nestled between its two side buttons) to launch apps or workouts dcrainmaker.com. Interestingly, this rotating crown doesn’t actually scroll through menus – the rotation is “just for fun” with no software function, and there’s no classic rotating bezel like older Galaxy watches, a design omission some fans miss dcrainmaker.com. The Galaxy Watch Ultra’s aesthetic is a unique “squircle” (square-circle hybrid) design that stands out. Overall it feels premium and solid on the wrist, but with slightly less bulky, rugged styling than the Garmin. Reviewers did praise the button guard placement for preventing accidental presses (addressing an issue seen on Apple’s side button) dcrainmaker.com.

Bottom line: All three watches use titanium and sapphire for toughness, but Garmin’s Tactix is purpose-built for military-grade resilience, with the highest weight and bulk to match. Apple’s Ultra 2 finds a balance of luxury and ruggedness (certified for diving and dust), and Samsung’s Ultra aims for a polished yet durable build. If your life depends on your watch surviving the harshest conditions, Garmin’s tank-like construction (MIL-STD-810, 10 ATM) leads the pack the5krunner.com, though Apple and Samsung aren’t far behind for typical outdoor and underwater adventures.

Display & Interface

Screen Technology: All three watches feature bright, full-color OLED displays – a key upgrade in this category, as even Garmin’s typically transflective Fenix line moved to AMOLED for the Tactix 7 edition. The Apple Watch Ultra 2 sports a 1.92-inch LTPO OLED display that can reach an astounding 3000 nits peak brightness, making it Apple’s brightest display ever apple.com. This is a 50% jump over the original Ultra’s 2000 nits, ensuring readability even under glaring sunlight dcrainmaker.com. Apple’s display also dims to just 1 nit for dark environments to conserve night vision dcrainmaker.com. The Tactix 7 AMOLED similarly uses a 1.4-inch AMOLED screen (454×454 resolution) that testers report is easy to read even in bright sun the5krunner.com. Uniquely, Garmin allows it to dim to extremely low brightness for covert use with night-vision goggles the5krunner.com – a tactical consideration Apple and Samsung don’t explicitly have. The Galaxy Watch Ultra matches Apple with a 3,000 nit AMOLED display as well dcrainmaker.com dcrainmaker.com, and offers a 480×480 resolution (approximately 1.5-inch diameter). In real-world use, reviewers found Samsung’s ultra-bright screen excellent in bright environments (e.g. “no problems seeing it on Mediterranean beaches or mountain tops” dcrainmaker.com). All three screens are always-on display (AOD) capable for showing the time and stats continuously, though enabling AOD reduces battery life (more on that below).

User Interface & Controls: Each watch approaches interaction differently. The Apple Watch Ultra 2 uses Apple’s familiar watchOS interface: a combination of touchscreen, the Digital Crown dial, and the side buttons (including the programmable Action Button). The interface is fluid and app-rich, benefitting from Apple’s large app ecosystem. With watchOS 10 and beyond, Apple introduced widget stacks and revamped apps for better at-a-glance info, and even added an intuitive “Double Tap” gesture (pinching index and thumb) to trigger common actions without touching the screen dcrainmaker.com. Apple’s UI is generally praised for polish and ease of use, though heavy rain or gloves can hamper the touch controls – which is where the physical crown and buttons come in handy.

The Garmin Tactix 7 AMOLED runs Garmin’s proprietary OS, which is optimized for button navigation and glanceable data rather than flashy animations. It offers a 5-button layout (no rotating crown) plus a touchscreen that can be enabled as needed. Garmin’s UI is highly customizable with widgets, data pages, and mapping, but not as graphically rich as Apple or Wear OS. Importantly, the Garmin’s interface is designed to work even in harsh conditions: the physical buttons and transflective heritage mean it’s very reliable in rain, mud, or with gloves, and even the touchscreen is tuned to be usable with wet fingers better than most dcrainmaker.com. The Tactix also features unique modes like Night Vision Mode (which changes the display to red monochrome to preserve night vision) and Stealth Mode (which cuts off wireless and map tracking for covert use) – underscoring its specialized interface for tactical users the5krunner.com the5krunner.com. While Garmin’s system lacks third-party apps like the others, it supports Connect IQ widgets and is extremely robust for its core functionalities.

The Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra runs Google’s Wear OS (Wear OS 5/6) with Samsung’s One UI Watch layer on top dcrainmaker.com. This means it behaves similarly to other Wear OS smartwatches: you navigate via swipes and taps, with two side buttons and the additional Quick Button for shortcuts dcrainmaker.com. Notably, Samsung omitted its fan-favorite rotating bezel – navigation is done on-screen or via the touchscreen rotating bezel simulation (swiping around the edge). Some reviewers lament the lack of a physical rotating bezel for tactile control dcrainmaker.com. The touchscreen responsiveness is generally good, but when wet (rain or swim) it can falter – testers found it “totally useless when wet… slightly worse than Apple, and definitely not as good as [the more rugged] Suunto/Garmin/Polar touchscreens” dcrainmaker.com. However, Wear OS brings big advantages in third-party app support: from Spotify and YouTube Music to Strava, Komoot, Google Maps, and many more, the Galaxy Watch Ultra can run a wide array of apps right on the watch dcrainmaker.com. Its interface also integrates with Google Assistant and Samsung’s services. One UI Watch provides a clean layout of widgets (“tiles”) for health stats, workouts, and more, which users found intuitive and customizable dcrainmaker.com.

Bottom line: Apple and Samsung offer bright, high-resolution OLED displays (3000 nits) with touch-centric, modern UIs, whereas Garmin’s AMOLED, while also vibrant, is leveraged in a more utilitarian interface focused on reliability in any conditions. Apple’s UI is the smoothest and most iPhone-integrated; Samsung’s is highly versatile thanks to Wear OS apps; Garmin’s is less flashy but purpose-built for readability and control in extreme environments (even under night vision) the5krunner.com. If you prioritize a rich app ecosystem and slick visuals, Apple or Samsung lead – but if you need an interface that won’t quit in the wild, Garmin’s no-nonsense approach is ideal.

Hardware & Performance

Processing Power: Under the hood, the Apple Watch Ultra 2 runs on Apple’s custom S9 SiP (System-in-Package), which contains a new dual-core CPU with 5.6 billion transistors – roughly 60% more than the prior generation’s chip dcrainmaker.com. This yields snappier performance and enables new features (like the Double Tap gesture and on-device Siri processing) that leverage the S9’s 4-core Neural Engine dcrainmaker.com. In everyday terms, the Ultra 2 feels very responsive, whether launching apps, rendering animations, or handling intensive tasks like mapping. Apple pairs this with ample storage (32 GB) for apps and music, and dual-frequency GPS hardware (more on GPS later).

Garmin’s Tactix 7 AMOLED is powered by Garmin’s latest wearable chipset (exact specs are proprietary, but comparable to the tech in the Fenix 8/Epix Pro series). Garmin doesn’t emphasize processor specs, but user reports indicate the performance got a boost in the latest generation – the interface and maps render faster than on previous models forums.garmin.com forums.garmin.com. Post-activity processing (like saving workouts and generating metrics) is almost instant on the new Tactix, whereas older models had slight delays forums.garmin.com. In short, Garmin quietly upgraded processing to handle the demands of an AMOLED screen and detailed maps. The Tactix 7 also comes with huge onboard storage (typically ~32 GB) to hold global maps and music. It features multi-band GNSS chipset technology by Airoha, which is regarded as one of the most accurate positioning chips available the5krunner.com. Though raw CPU/GPU power is less public, the watch is plenty fast in use and highly optimized for battery efficiency given its multi-week endurance.

Samsung’s Galaxy Watch Ultra uses an Exynos W-series processor built on a new 3 nm process, which Samsung claims is up to 3× faster than the chip in their previous Watch6 dcrainmaker.com. This results in fluid scrolling and quick app launches. It also helps enable advanced features like on-device AI-based health metrics (e.g. computing a new “Energy Score” from multiple sensors) without bogging down the watch dcrainmaker.com. The Galaxy Watch Ultra has 16 GB of storage (common for Wear OS devices) for apps and offline music, and it too sports dual-frequency GNSS for precise location tracking dcrainmaker.com. With only one size (47 mm), all Galaxy Ultra units include LTE connectivity standard (eSIM), meaning they can connect to cellular networks on their own dcrainmaker.com – a differentiation from Apple, which sells cellular as standard on Ultra, and Garmin, which relies on a paired phone or optional satellite communicator for connectivity.

Sensors & Special Hardware: All three watches are loaded with health and environmental sensors. The Apple Watch Ultra 2 carries Apple’s latest sensors: an optical heart rate sensor, electrical heart sensor (ECG capability), blood oxygen (SpO₂) sensor, and a new second-generation Ultra Wideband (UWB 2) chip for precise device finding dcrainmaker.com. It has a barometric altimeter (with expanded range up to 9,000 m elevation and 500 m depth tracking for divers) businessinsider.com, compass, always-on altimeter, accelerometer/gyro, ambient light sensor, dual speakers and three-mic array (for improved sound and Siri). Notably, Apple’s dual speakers on Ultra 2 are loud enough to use as an emergency 85 dB siren audible up to 180 m – a unique safety feature introduced with Ultra series dcrainmaker.com. Ultra 2 also features an accurate thermometer for water and ambient temperature, useful in diving and outdoor swimming.

The Garmin Tactix 7 AMOLED similarly bristles with sensors: a new Gen 5 Garmin Elevate optical HR sensor (noted to be one of Garmin’s most accurate wrist heart-rate sensors yet the5krunner.com), plus support for external HR straps via ANT+ & Bluetooth. It includes a pulse oximeter for blood oxygen, barometric altimeter, compass, gyroscope, thermometer, and ambient light sensor. The Tactix has a built-in multicolor LED flashlight (white and green LEDs) – extremely handy for night activity and the green light specifically preserves night vision the5krunner.com. Unique to Garmin are specialty features like a ballistics mode (on the Ballistics edition) for shooters and the aforementioned Night Vision Goggle compatibility which tweaks screen output so it’s readable through NVGs the5krunner.com. Wireless connectivity includes Bluetooth, ANT+ for a plethora of external sensors (from chest straps to cycling power meters and satellite communicators), and Wi-Fi for sync. Garmin forgoes cellular/LTE in this model, preferring to maintain battery life; however, it can pair with Garmin’s inReach satellite communicators for SOS messaging off-grid, which many extreme adventurers appreciate.

The Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra has a rich sensor suite as well. It features an 8 PD BioActive sensor which combines optical heart rate, electrical heart (ECG) and bioimpedance analysis (BIA) electrodes. The BIA sensor allows body composition readings (body fat %, muscle mass etc.), a feature unique to Samsung among these three. It also has blood oxygen monitoring and can measure skin temperature (primarily used for advanced sleep tracking). Samsung touts FDA-cleared ECG and even blood pressure monitoring – the latter uses the optical HR in tandem with calibration on a blood pressure cuff (note: BP and ECG features require Samsung phones in many regions due to app restrictions). New for this generation, Samsung secured FDA approval for sleep apnea detection using the watch’s SpO₂ and heart data dcrainmaker.com dcrainmaker.com – a notable health feature that can alert users to possible apnea events. The Galaxy Watch Ultra, like Apple, has an 85 dB siren for emergencies dcrainmaker.com. It includes a barometer, altimeter, compass, ambient light sensor, microphone, and speaker (so you can take calls on-wrist or hear notifications). Additionally, Samsung has introduced some novel metrics via software (e.g. “Antioxidant Index” in the 2025 model, meant to estimate stress on the body) tomsguide.com. For connectivity, the Galaxy Ultra shines with LTE, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, and NFC (for Samsung Pay/Google Pay). It also supports connecting to external cycling sensors (power meters, cadence) via Bluetooth, as Samsung has added serious cycling/triathlon modes.

Performance in Use: In daily use, all three watches perform smoothly for their intended purposes. Apple’s Ultra 2 feels extremely fast and fluid thanks to the S9 chip – Apple focused on incremental hardware upgrades and indeed “the Apple Watch Ultra 2 is fundamentally the same device as its predecessor internally, with an updated chip and much brighter display” appleinsider.com dcrainmaker.com. That said, Apple’s watchOS optimizations mean even older models are smooth; the Ultra 2 just ensures you’re future-proofed for the latest features. Garmin’s interface, while simpler, is now speedy enough that map panning and metric calculations are near instant, which Garmin fans have applauded as a pleasant surprise in the Fenix/Tactix 7→8 generation forums.garmin.com. Samsung’s watch, with its new processor, finally closes the gap in responsiveness – one expert noted that “in 2024, it appears Samsung has finally delivered a mostly accurate [and performant] smartwatch… the eagle has probably landed. Mostly.” dcrainmaker.com, a tongue-in-cheek nod to Samsung’s significant improvements after years of so-so performance. The Galaxy Watch Ultra generally runs apps and tracking reliably, although high-intensity use (like long GPS workouts with music streaming) can still tax it, leading to warm temperatures or battery drain.

In summary, Apple and Samsung pack cutting-edge silicon for snappy performance, while Garmin uses a slightly more behind-the-scenes approach but ensures its hardware reliably powers huge battery life and demanding mapping. Each has all the essential sensors, with Samsung offering some unique health sensors (BIA, blood pressure) and Apple/Garmin leaning into safety (siren, dive sensors, etc.). None of these devices feel underpowered for their class – but if raw computing power and a fluid UI are your priority, Apple’s S9 and Samsung’s 3 nm chip shine, whereas Garmin’s focus is on robust sensor integration and efficiency over flashy processing specs.

Health & Fitness Tracking

One of the biggest reasons to own an “ultra” smartwatch is for comprehensive health and fitness tracking. All three devices excel here, but each with its own philosophy:

Apple Watch Ultra 2: Apple has steadily turned the Watch into a powerhouse fitness tracker, and the Ultra 2 is the best yet for Apple’s ecosystem. It covers all the basics: continuous heart rate monitoring, VO₂ max estimates, step counting, calorie burn, ECG for heart rhythm analysis, blood oxygen monitoring, sleep tracking, menstrual cycle tracking (with temperature-based ovulation estimates for women), and more. With watchOS 10 and later, Apple introduced advanced metrics like Heart Rate Zones, Running Power, and new cycling metrics apple.com apple.com. Ultra 2 automatically detects when you arrive at a running track and switches to a special track running mode for precise distance laps – an “industry first” for track athletes apple.com. It also added Precision dual-frequency GPS, which Apple claims yields “the most accurate GPS in a sports watch” when combined with their custom algorithms apple.com – a bold claim supported by excellent real-world performance in many cases (urban canyon tests show very tight traces) dcrainmaker.com. For divers, Apple’s Depth app and Oceanic+ (third-party) turn the Ultra into a basic dive computer for recreational dives, tracking depth, water temp, and dive profiles. Health-wise, Ultra 2 received new software features like Sleep Apnea detection (using blood oxygen variation at night) and the ability to log mood and mental health data in 2024 businessinsider.com. With on-device Siri, you can now ask the watch for health stats or log workouts by voice, even offline dcrainmaker.com. Apple’s Fitness+ service and tight integration with the iPhone’s Health app mean data is easily accessible and shareable. The Ultra doesn’t try to diagnose medical conditions, but it will alert you to high/low heart rate, irregular rhythm (possible AFib), low blood oxygen, or loud noise exposure – acting as a proactive health monitor.

Garmin Tactix 7 AMOLED: Garmin is renowned for fitness and outdoor tracking, and the Tactix 7 is packed with training features. It has 24/7 heart rate monitoring with improved accuracy (Gen5 sensor) the5krunner.com, and tracks stress, respiration, SpO₂, and Body Battery (Garmin’s holistic energy metric) continuously the5krunner.com. Sleep tracking on Garmin has improved, offering detailed sleep stage breakdowns and a Sleep Score with Advanced Sleep Monitoring the5krunner.com. The Tactix shines for athletes: it supports dozens of sport modes (running, cycling, swimming, triathlon, hiking, climbing, skiing, strength, tactical activities like parachute jumpmaster, and more). For runners and cyclists, it provides advanced metrics like training load, training status, recovery time, VO₂ max, Endurance Score, Hill Score, and even wrist-based Running Power without needing a footpod the5krunner.com. New metrics like Morning Report give you a summary of sleep, recovery, and training outlook each morning the5krunner.com. The Tactix includes everything from basic step and calorie tracking to specialized tools: e.g., a Tactical activity profile that can show dual-format GPS coordinates (MGRS and lat/long) simultaneously the5krunner.com, and a Stealth Mode which stops storing GPS tracks (for sensitive missions) while still logging your biometrics the5krunner.com. There’s also an expansive navigation suite (see next section) that hikers and trail runners love. Another unique aspect: the Tactix can pair with external sensors via ANT+ – meaning you can integrate chest heart straps, cycling power meters, temperature sensors, etc., for high-precision training data that Apple and Samsung (which rely on Bluetooth-only) support to a more limited degree. Garmin’s training analysis is arguably best-in-class: the watch will evaluate your fitness trends and even suggest daily workouts or predict race times. It lacks the on-watch ECG or blood pressure capabilities of the others, but Garmin focuses on reliability and breadth of fitness metrics. Industry experts often note that Garmin is the choice for serious endurance athletes who want granular control and accuracy in training data dcrainmaker.com. The Tactix underscores that with its inclusion of niche features like a ballistics calculator (Applied Ballistics on specific edition) for snipers or the Jumpmaster mode for skydiving (HAHO/HALO jumps) the5krunner.com. Few wearables can match that breadth.

Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra: Samsung’s Ultra, especially with its 2024/2025 software, greatly ramped up health and fitness tracking – in many ways to compete with Apple and Garmin. It continuously tracks heart rate, stress, SpO₂, and sleep, and adds on-watch coaching features. For example, Samsung introduced a Running Coach that provides real-time form analysis and voice guidance for runs tomsguide.com. The new Multisport (Triathlon) mode lets triathletes seamlessly transition through swim-bike-run in one workout, a first for Samsung and something Garmin has long offered dcrainmaker.com. Cyclists get advanced data: the Galaxy Watch Ultra can connect to a Bluetooth power meter and even estimate your cycling VO₂ max and FTP (Functional Threshold Power) via a guided test dcrainmaker.com – features inspired by high-end Garmin devices. Hikers and outdoor users can utilize apps like Komoot or AllTrails on Wear OS for trail maps and guidance. Samsung Health provides detailed exercise tracking and even some unique metrics: the “Energy Score” (Samsung’s holistic daily readiness metric based on sleep, activity, HRV, etc.) dcrainmaker.com, and a new “Antioxidant Index” which supposedly reflects health based on user habits (this one is quite new and still being understood) tomsguide.com. The Galaxy Watch Ultra also measures body composition (body fat%, skeletal muscle, BMI, etc.) using its BIA sensor – a feature useful for those monitoring fitness or weight loss progress, and something neither Apple nor Garmin offer currently. On the medical side, the Galaxy Watch can record an ECG and detect signs of AFib (though, like Apple, it’s not continuously scanning by default). It can also measure Blood Pressure (if you recalibrate monthly with a cuff) – a standout feature, though consider it a wellness indicator rather than a precise medical reading. Samsung has also joined Apple and Garmin in adding sleep coaching insights: after logging a week of sleep, the watch can assign you a “Sleep Animal” chronotype and give personalized tips to improve sleep quality. Overall, with Wear OS and Samsung Health, the Galaxy Watch Ultra has become a legitimate fitness companion – DC Rainmaker even notes it’s the first Samsung watch he’d consider “viable” for serious sports tracking due to its improved GPS and sensor accuracy dcrainmaker.com dcrainmaker.com. Still, Garmin’s deep training analytics and Apple’s ultra-polished health integration slightly edge out Samsung in their respective strengths (Garmin for hardcore training, Apple for lifestyle and broad health tracking).

Accuracy & Insights: In terms of sensor accuracy, heart rate tracking on all three is generally good for optical sensors, with Garmin’s new Elevate sensor and Apple’s tried-and-true sensor performing similarly well for steady efforts, and Samsung’s new BioActive sensor also improved (though some reviews note it can still lag during rapid intensity changes). DC Rainmaker’s tests found the Galaxy Watch Ultra’s heart rate and GPS “mostly accurate” – a big step up for Samsung dcrainmaker.com. Apple’s dual-frequency GPS and Garmin’s multi-band GPS both deliver excellent location accuracy even in challenging environments like city streets or dense forests. In one notable urban test (the “NYC GPS gauntlet”), the Apple Watch Ultra 2 and a comparable Garmin (Epix Pro) were both very precise, with each having slight edge cases but overall impressively tracking a route amidst skyscrapers dcrainmaker.com. Garmin still holds an advantage in sensor ecosystem (use of chest HR, cycling sensors, etc.) which can improve accuracy further. Sleep tracking has its pros and cons on each: many users find Garmin’s sleep analysis and “Body Battery” useful for gauging recovery, while Apple’s integration with iPhone (and focus on consistency and respiratory rate) appeals to others, and Samsung’s detailed sleep coaching and now FDA-cleared apnea alerts add another dimension.

In summary, all three watches deliver top-tier health and fitness tracking. Apple Watch Ultra 2 is an excellent all-rounder – “the best Apple Watch for fitness and outdoor enthusiasts” and among the best smartwatches overall businessinsider.com businessinsider.com, with an emphasis on intuitive features and tight ecosystem sync. Garmin Tactix 7 is like having a personal coach/navigator on your wrist – it’s unrivaled in breadth of metrics and is the go-to for serious athletes, explorers, and tactical users who need data and reliability over polish. Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra has transformed into a formidable fitness watch too, bridging general wellness and serious training – it brings in sophisticated coaching and measurements (body composition, etc.), albeit with a bit less of Garmin’s extreme-depth data crunching and a bit less of Apple’s seamlessness. Your choice may hinge on whether you prefer Apple’s or Samsung’s more lifestyle-friendly approach versus Garmin’s performance-driven approach. Rest assured, for daily activity tracking, all three will count steps, calories, and workouts accurately – it’s in the deeper metrics and training tools that the differences really shine.

GPS & Navigation

For adventurers and outdoor athletes, robust GPS and navigation features are crucial – and this is where distinctions become clear.

Apple Watch Ultra 2: The Ultra 2 features a dual-frequency (L1+L5) GPS receiver. Apple’s implementation, combined with clever algorithms and Apple Maps data, yields extremely accurate tracking. Apple boldly claims Ultra 2 offers “the most accurate GPS in a sports watch” apple.com. In practice, reviewers have found the GPS tracks to be excellent, often matching or outperforming dedicated Garmin devices in open sky and even challenging city scenarios dcrainmaker.com. The Ultra has a high-resolution map when using the Apple Maps app on the watch, and with watchOS 10, Apple introduced on-wrist topographic maps with contour lines dcrainmaker.com dcrainmaker.com. However, there are important caveats: to use detailed maps on the Ultra, you must download regions offline to your iPhone first, and the watch can then access those maps during an adventure dcrainmaker.com dcrainmaker.com. The watch itself doesn’t store the full maps, and it relies on having your iPhone nearby (Bluetooth connection) to pull map tiles for the display dcrainmaker.com dcrainmaker.com. Apple’s mapping is also point-to-point navigation focused: you can ask for directions to a location and it’ll guide you (with turn-by-turn directions if network is available), but it doesn’t yet allow importing a GPX route to follow turn-by-turn – a feature common in Garmin. You can drop waypoints and use the Backtrack feature (which uses the compass to retrace steps) or navigate to a saved point, but following a planned route on the watch is not natively supported as of watchOS 10 dcrainmaker.com dcrainmaker.com. Apple’s VP of Fitness Technologies acknowledged they’re aware that more robust route-based navigation is something users want, calling maps and workout integration “a journey we’re on… exciting space for us… we’ll keep working on it” dcrainmaker.com dcrainmaker.com. In short, Apple Ultra’s GPS accuracy is stellar, and basic breadcrumb and point nav is there (with features like last cellular point marking on the map, helpful for backcountry) dcrainmaker.com dcrainmaker.com. But it lacks some advanced offline nav abilities (no on-device worldwide topo maps yet, no direct route guidance on-watch without phone). For many casual hikers or runners, the Ultra’s capabilities suffice; for serious navigation without a phone, it’s more limited. One neat Ultra feature: the Compass app will automatically log your last known location when you lose cellular, and it offers an orienteering view and elevational graphs – useful for quick reference in the wild.

Garmin Tactix 7 AMOLED: Navigation is arguably Garmin’s strongest suit. The Tactix 7 comes preloaded with TopoActive maps for your region (e.g., continent maps) and has global maps available. It can display detailed topographic maps on-wrist, complete with contour lines, trails, peaks, bodies of water, and even points of interest the5krunner.com. It also includes specialty maps: SkiView maps (with ski run names and difficulty), golf course maps for 43,000 courses, and it supports Garmin’s Outdoor Maps+ subscription for high-detail satellite imagery, public land boundaries, and more the5krunner.com. Crucially, no phone or data connection is needed for Garmin’s mapping – it’s all stored on the watch. You can create or import routes (GPX files, courses from Garmin Connect or third-party) and get turn-by-turn directions or off-route alerts right on the watch. The multi-band GPS on the Tactix is extremely accurate; experts consider Garmin’s latest Airoha GNSS chipset to be “probably the most accurate from any watch vendor” especially when combined with Garmin’s years of experience refining GPS algorithms the5krunner.com. This means in dense cities or canyons, the Tactix tracks very well. For backcountry use, Garmin offers TracBack (reverse route guidance), a Backcountry mode, and Expedition mode (ultra-low-power tracking for multi-week treks). Unique to Tactix (and some Fenix models) are features like dual-format coordinates (displaying MGRS and lat/long simultaneously) the5krunner.com and integration of jumpmaster navigation (marking DZs, guiding parachute jumps). The Tactix is also a capable aviation nav tool: it can show NEXRAD weather radar data, and features direct-to navigation to known waypoints or airports the5krunner.com, useful for pilots or skydivers. With Garmin, one can also leverage heat maps (popular routes) and round-trip routing for runs/cycling based on distance. The satellite reception is so solid that multi-band mode yields tracks hugging the correct side of the road, etc., in most tests. The trade-off is complexity: using maps and planning routes on the watch’s small screen can be fiddly (though improved with the AMOLED touch). But Garmin Connect and BaseCamp apps make it easier to plan on phone/PC and sync to watch. Overall, Garmin’s navigation capability is leagues ahead for anyone needing robust offline mapping and navigation – it’s essentially a hiking GPS on your wrist. As one reviewer put it, the Tactix 7 AMOLED is “at the pinnacle of what Garmin offers” in 2023 the5krunner.com, and navigation is a big part of that.

Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra: Samsung leverages Google’s navigation prowess through Wear OS. Out of the box, you can use Google Maps on the watch for turn-by-turn navigation (with or without phone, since the watch has LTE). Google Maps on Wear OS can do basic navigation to searched places – useful in urban environments – but it requires a data connection unless you have offline maps downloaded on your connected phone (Wear OS itself doesn’t store full maps offline independently yet). For hiking/trail navigation, Samsung doesn’t include built-in topo maps, but you have options: apps like Komoot or Samsung’s own GPX import in Samsung Health. In fact, Samsung added the ability to import GPX files and follow routes on the watch using the Samsung Health app – the watch will show a breadcrumb trail and basic directions. It’s not as sophisticated as Garmin’s full maps, but it’s a nod to outdoor users. Additionally, Samsung’s latest One UI Watch software introduces a Track Back feature for hikes (similar to Apple’s backtrack/crumb trail). The Galaxy Watch Ultra’s dual-frequency GNSS means its raw GPS tracks are very good – in testing, it performed comparably to Apple and Garmin in open-sky, and significantly better than previous Galaxy watches (which sometimes had wobbly tracks) dcrainmaker.com. The inclusion of compass and altimeter allows basic orienteering and elevation tracking; and apps can tap into these sensors. For example, third-party apps can display topographic maps (there are a few Wear OS apps for offline maps). Samsung’s watch also benefits from the smartphone integration – you can plan a route on your phone (in Google Maps or Komoot) and then use the watch for navigation cues. One advantage: with LTE, the Galaxy Watch Ultra can navigate independently (stream map data) if you leave your phone behind and still have cell service. However, in truly off-grid scenarios, it doesn’t match Garmin’s self-sufficiency. Samsung does allow downloading offline maps in Google Maps on the watch as of Wear OS 3/4 updates, but it’s a bit limited in interface. For most users, the Galaxy Watch Ultra handles city navigation and casual hiking fine, but if you need detailed contour maps and extensive route planning on your wrist, it’s not as robust as Garmin.

Verdict on Navigation: Garmin Tactix 7 stands out as the navigation king, with full-fledged offline maps and a cornucopia of navigation tools built-in the5krunner.com the5krunner.com. It’s the device you want if you’re navigating complex terrain or multi-day expeditions away from cell coverage. The Apple Watch Ultra 2 offers superb GPS accuracy and a user-friendly approach to wayfinding (especially for day hikes or runs with an iPhone in tow), but it currently relies on the phone for rich map data and lacks true turn-by-turn route guidance on-wrist dcrainmaker.com dcrainmaker.com. Samsung’s Galaxy Watch Ultra lies somewhere in between: thanks to Wear OS, it has versatile options via apps and can do standalone navigation for simpler needs, but it doesn’t provide the deep built-in mapping Garmin does. If your adventures involve an open road in the city or following a pre-planned route occasionally, Apple or Samsung will serve you well (with Samsung benefiting from Google’s maps ecosystem). If your adventures involve orienteering through unknown wilderness or needing your watch as a backup nav device, Garmin is unparalleled.

Smart Features & Ecosystem Integration

Beyond fitness, these watches differ in how they act as “smart” devices in daily life and how they integrate with your other gadgets.

Apple Watch Ultra 2 – iOS-Centric Smartwatch: The Apple Watch is famously an extension of the iPhone, and that remains its strength. With an iPhone in your pocket, Ultra 2 delivers seamless integration: calls, texts, emails, and app notifications all mirror to the wrist. You can take phone calls on the Ultra 2’s built-in speaker/mic or via Bluetooth earbuds – call quality is decent, aided by the three-mic array that reduces wind noise. iMessage and SMS are fully supported with voice dictation, canned replies, or a tiny on-screen keyboard to respond. Apple’s rich ecosystem means if you have AirPods, the Watch can control them; if you start a timer on your HomePod, it shows on your watch; you can use the watch as a viewfinder/shutter for your iPhone’s camera, etc. The Ultra 2 supports Apple Pay for contactless payments, and with the Action Button you can set shortcuts (e.g., start a specific workout or open a favorite app instantly). Siri on the watch (now processing many requests on-device with the S9 chip) can control HomeKit smart home devices, set reminders, or log health data by voice dcrainmaker.com. App-wise, Apple’s watchOS has the most mature app ecosystem among wearables – you have everything from Uber to Spotify to numerous fitness and productivity apps designed for Apple Watch. While you can’t run completely standalone iOS apps (the watch apps are companions to phone apps), many apps now work pretty independently once installed. However, the Apple Watch only works with iPhones – there is no Android support at all. Within Apple’s walled garden, the experience is very refined: for instance, unlocking your Mac or autofilling OTP codes, everything ties together. The Ultra model also uniquely has the Depth app for diving and some specialized sensors that app developers (like Oceanic+ for dive computers) can leverage in the ecosystem. In summary, if you’re an iPhone user, the Apple Watch Ultra 2 is a natural fit – it’s designed to dovetail with Apple’s ecosystem at every level, from Apple Health to Apple Music to AirTag finding with UWB. But if you ever leave the iPhone, the watch becomes virtually unusable (there’s no compatibility with other platforms).

Garmin Tactix 7 – Cross-Platform, Less “Smart”: Garmin watches play well with both iOS and Android, but they are not as feature-rich in general smartphone tasks. The Tactix 7 will show notifications from your phone (whether you use an iPhone or an Android phone), and you can customize which apps’ notifications come through. If paired with an Android phone, Garmin allows sending quick replies or canned responses to texts/WhatsApp (this feature is not available when paired to iPhone due to Apple restrictions). The Tactix can also answer or reject calls from the watch, but it has no built-in speaker or microphone, so you can’t talk through the watch – it simply signals your phone to pick up, or you can hook up a Bluetooth headset. In essence, Garmin treats phone features as basic conveniences. On-watch music is supported though: the Tactix 7 has storage for music files or offline playlists from Spotify, Deezer, or Amazon Music, which you can play via Bluetooth headphones – great for phone-free workouts. Garmin Pay offers mobile payments (with support from many banks worldwide, albeit fewer than Apple Pay/Google Pay). The Garmin Connect IQ store has downloadable watch faces, widgets, and a limited selection of apps (think niche fitness tools, data fields, maybe a news headline widget – nothing like the breadth of Apple/Google’s app stores). But Garmin intentionally forgoes a lot of “smartwatch-y” stuff to keep the watch focused and battery-efficient. Don’t expect to browse social media or watch videos on a Garmin – it’s not built for that. One notable integration: Garmin watches can sync data to lots of fitness platforms (Strava, MyFitnessPal, etc.) easily, and they can receive training plans or routes from third-party services without hassle. Also, Garmin’s ecosystem (Garmin Connect app and web) is robust for health data, and you can export your data freely. In terms of ecosystem, Garmin is fairly platform-agnostic: it doesn’t deeply integrate with your phone’s OS features (no voice assistant usage except via a workaround widget, no controlling phone camera, etc.), but it also doesn’t lock you in – you could switch from iPhone to Android and your Garmin works the same, which cannot be said for Apple or Samsung’s watches. Additionally, Garmin uniquely offers satellite communication integration: if you have a Garmin inReach device, you can control it from the watch or send SOS using the watch to trigger the inReach. This is part of Garmin’s own ecosystem for adventurers. Overall, if you primarily want a smartwatch for productivity, messaging, or multimedia, Garmin will feel limited. But if you view smartwatch features as secondary to fitness/outdoor functions, the basics are all here and work reliably across devices.

Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra – Android’s Ultra Watch: The Galaxy Watch Ultra is built to shine in the Android ecosystem, particularly if you have a Samsung phone. Compatibility: It works with any modern Android phone (Android 10+), but certain advanced health features (ECG, BP) require installing Samsung-specific apps that are officially only available on Samsung phones. In practice, savvy users can side-load those apps on other Android phones, but it’s a bit of a hoop. With a Samsung Galaxy phone, setup is seamless and every feature is enabled by default. The Galaxy Watch Ultra offers a full suite of phone features: you can make and receive calls on-wrist (the LTE model even independently if you have a cellular plan), use voice assistants (Google Assistant or Samsung’s Bixby), get notifications and reply via voice dictation, keyboard, or quick replies. Notifications on Wear OS are rich – e.g., you can see images from a messaging app. The watch can also remotely control your phone’s camera (with a Samsung phone, you even get a live preview on the watch). Mobile payments are supported via Google Wallet or Samsung Pay. A big plus is the app ecosystem: thousands of Wear OS apps and watch faces are available via the Google Play Store on the watch. That means you have things like Google Maps, Google Keep (notes), Outlook and Gmail, ride-share apps, music streaming apps, and games, all accessible. The Watch Ultra can stream music over LTE or Wi-Fi (it has YouTube Music and Spotify apps that can stream or download tracks). One UI Watch also ties into Samsung’s ecosystem: if you use SmartThings for smart home, you can control devices from the watch; if you use Samsung Wallet, you can store loyalty cards or even a digital car key on the watch. Moreover, because it’s Wear OS, it integrates with Google services – for instance, Google Calendar events and tasks, turn-by-turn from Google Maps, etc., work great. The flip side is battery life is shorter when using these rich smart features (the watch is doing a lot, similar to a tiny smartphone). It’s also Android-only – it cannot be paired with an iPhone at all (since Galaxy Watch4, Samsung dropped iOS support). One ecosystem advantage: Samsung and Google have committed to long software support; the 2024/2025 models launched with Wear OS 5 and One UI Watch 5/6, and get updates and new features (e.g., One UI Watch 8 brought new health features and UI improvements tomsguide.com). A special mention: the Galaxy Watch Ultra now incorporates some AI features – Samsung talked about “Galaxy AI” delivering personalized health insights samsung.com, and with Google’s upcoming Gemini AI on device rumor, we may see voice assistant or text reply improvements. It’s not a huge factor yet, but hints that these watches will become even smarter in context understanding.

Cross-Device Use and Lock-in: A key difference to highlight: Apple Watch only works with Apple devices, Samsung Watch only with Android (best with Samsung), while Garmin works with both iOS and Android (and even without a phone for core functions). So if you value flexibility or think you might switch phone platforms, Garmin gives you freedom; Apple and Samsung essentially commit you to their respective smartphone platforms to get the most out of them. Reviewers have noted that Apple and Samsung’s ultra watches “don’t actually compete against each other in most ways – they’re each locked into their own ecosystems… both are competing more with Garmin than with each other” dcrainmaker.com. In other words, an iPhone user will likely choose between Apple vs Garmin, while an Android user chooses Samsung vs Garmin. There’s little cross-shopping between Apple and Samsung due to compatibility.

Special Smart Features: Apple’s advantages include things like Fall Detection and Crash Detection on the Ultra (it can sense a hard fall or a car accident and call emergency services automatically – Garmin and Samsung have incident detection for workouts or falls, but Apple’s is particularly refined with crash-specific algorithms). Apple also has international emergency calling on cellular models without needing the phone, and coming to Ultra 3 perhaps, satellite SOS (more on that in Future section). Samsung’s advantages are flexibility and customization – you can sideload apps, use different app stores, tweak the watch’s look with thousands of faces, even emulate classic digital watch faces, etc. Garmin’s advantage is that it will continue to log your activities and even limited notifications far beyond when Apple/Samsung would have died (due to battery) – that’s a form of reliability which could be considered a “smart” feature in extreme cases (e.g., an ultramarathoner on a 3-day race can still get an emergency notification or weather alert on a Garmin whereas an Apple/Samsung would be long dead or require charging).

In day-to-day life, Apple Watch Ultra 2 feels like a high-tech personal assistant on your wrist – handling payments, messages, reminders with ease for any iPhone user. Samsung’s Galaxy Watch Ultra feels like strapping an Android phone to your wrist – extremely capable, highly customizable, and deeply integrated with Google and Samsung services for those in the Android world. Garmin Tactix 7 feels like having a pro fitness instrument that dabbles in basic smartwatch conveniences – it’ll buzz your wrist for a text and let you skip a song, but its core identity is not about checking Twitter or talking to Alexa; it’s about your run, your mission, or your adventure.

Battery Life & Charging

Battery endurance is a defining factor for any smartwatch, especially for those venturing off-grid. Here the differences are stark:

Apple Watch Ultra 2: Apple improved the Ultra’s efficiency slightly with the S9 chip, but official battery specs remain similar to the first Ultra. Apple quotes “Up to 36 hours” of normal use on a full charge apple.com. In real terms, that’s about a day and a half of mixed usage (with the always-on display on by default, but not doing GPS exercise all day). Many users can stretch it to 2 full days by turning off always-on display or using Low Power Mode. In Low Power Mode, which reduces refresh rates and disables always-on and background heart metrics, Apple claims up to 72 hours (3 days) max apple.com. In practice, that 72h is achievable with light use (basically just telling time and minimal interaction). For workouts, Apple provides specifics: up to 18 hours of continuous GPS workout (outdoor run) with Low Power settings apple.com, or around 12 hours of continuous GPS with normal settings. Those numbers suffice for most single-day activities (even an ultramarathon), but multi-day treks require either topping up or ultra-conservative mode. Compared to its rivals, the Ultra 2’s battery is much better than a standard Apple Watch (Series 9/10 last ~18 hours), but it’s still far behind Garmin’s multi-day longevity. Charging the Ultra is done with Apple’s magnetic fast charger (USB-C cable), which can refill about 0–80% in roughly an hour. So a quick charge can add many hours of use – that’s an advantage if you have access to power. In summary, the Ultra 2 reliably gives about 1.5–2 days per charge in typical use, which is great for an Apple Watch, but modest next to Garmin.

Garmin Tactix 7 AMOLED: Battery life is where Garmin obliterates the competition. Despite having a bright AMOLED screen, Garmin leveraged huge battery capacity and advanced power management. The Tactix 7 AMOLED can last up to 31 days in smartwatch mode (with default settings, not always-on) the5krunner.com, which is astounding. Even with the display always-on, it achieves ~11 days in smartwatch mode the5krunner.com. These figures mean you could wear it for weeks on an expedition without charging, especially if you utilize Battery Saver modes. Garmin specifies: Battery Saver Watch Mode: up to 41 days (this is a super stripped mode that just shows time/basic sensors) the5krunner.com. For GPS usage, the numbers are also impressive: GPS-only tracking: ~82 hours (58 hours with always-on display during GPS) the5krunner.com. Using all multi-band satellite systems, it’s ~38 hours (30h with AOD) the5krunner.com. And Garmin’s UltraTrac/Max Battery modes can stretch logging to 145 hours or even 27 days (Expedition mode) with reduced frequency the5krunner.com. These specs are far beyond what Apple or Samsung can do. In real-world terms, a marathon run using GPS + music on the Tactix might burn only ~10–15% of the battery, whereas that could nearly drain an Apple or Samsung. The trade-off is the Garmin’s larger size and weight partly come from that big battery. Charging the Garmin is via a proprietary cable (USB-A) that clips to the watch; it’s not as fast as Apple’s – a full charge might take around 2 hours given the massive capacity. But you charge so infrequently that it’s not a big chore. Garmin also offers detailed power management – you can see what feature is consuming how much and toggle things (like SpO₂ tracking, backlight brightness, etc.) to extend life. There’s even a “Stealth Mode” that not only cuts wireless but also can shut off storing GPS to maximize battery and privacy the5krunner.com. The bottom line: the Tactix’s battery life is in a different league. You could feasibly go on a week-long special ops mission or trek with continuous tracking and still not kill it, whereas Apple/Samsung would require daily charges or a powerbank. As one reviewer succinctly put it, “with an impressive battery life of up to 31 days, this smartwatch remains operational even during extended missions” the5krunner.com – a key selling point for its target audience.

Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra: Samsung improved battery life over its regular Galaxy Watch models, but it’s still closer to Apple’s realm than Garmin’s. The Galaxy Watch Ultra has a larger battery (likely around 590 mAh) than previous models. Samsung’s official claims were a bit all over: initially they didn’t quote a single “typical” usage number, perhaps because it varies by user. However, testers and Samsung community info suggest about 2–3 days of moderate use on a charge, and around 24 hours with heavy use including GPS and display on. DCRainmaker noted Samsung claims “48 hours in workout power saving mode, and 100 hours in regular power saving mode” dcrainmaker.com, implying that in a stripped down state it can stretch to ~4 days. In normal mode with always-on display active, many users see roughly 1.5 days (which is similar to Apple Ultra). If you turn AOD off and are not exercising a ton, 2 days is achievable, and with light use maybe touching a third day. The 100 hours claim likely refers to a basic power-saving setting that limits features heavily (comparable to Apple’s Low Power). In continuous GPS usage, independent tests show about 20–24 hours of GPS tracking can be done on one charge – enough for an all-day hike or an overnight ultra race if you’re efficient. Unlike Garmin, Samsung can’t do multi-week measurements, but it does beat most Wear OS devices thanks to its big battery and efficient OLED. Also, because the watch can do so much (LTE, bright screen, apps), if you use those heavily, it will drain faster. For instance, navigating with Google Maps continuously or streaming music on LTE will cut into that battery significantly (possibly lasting only a full day in that scenario). Charging is done wirelessly (Qi standard); Samsung provides a charger puck. It’s not particularly fast – going 0 to 100% might take ~1.5 hours. The benefit: you can use standard Qi wireless pads to top it up, or even reverse wireless charging from some Samsung phones. Practically, many Galaxy Watch Ultra owners charge a bit each day (e.g., while showering or at desk) to avoid running out, or every other night. In summary, Samsung’s Ultra can last about 2 days per charge in typical use, slightly edging Apple if you’re conservative, but basically in the same ballpark. It’s nowhere near Garmin’s multi-week endurance.

Battery Usage Scenarios: If you plan a multi-day trip without access to charging: Garmin is the only real choice among these – it can legitimately last throughout and still record your adventures fully. If you just need a watch that comfortably lasts a full marathon, ultra-run, or long hike: Apple and Samsung can both do a day’s hardcore activity (e.g., 12+ hours GPS) – Apple with Low Power Mode can reach 17 hours of workout apple.com, Samsung around 20 hours – and Garmin can do multiple days of that. If you want to wear your watch 24/7 for health tracking and sleep tracking: Garmin’s battery means no daily charging interruptions – you might only charge once every week or two, so it can truly monitor everything continuously. Apple and Samsung can track sleep overnight if you charged them a bit in the evening (common practice: top-up before bed to ensure ~100% at night). But you will have to incorporate charging into your daily routine with those.

In this sense, battery life can affect ecosystem too: The hassle factor of charging is lowest with Garmin – you almost forget about the charger on trips. With Apple, Apple’s tight integration somewhat makes up for it (fast charging and good battery management reminders). With Samsung, you might need to be mindful to not be caught with a dead watch midday (though the Ultra’s bigger battery has made that rarer than with older Galaxy watches). All told, Garmin Tactix 7 AMOLED utterly dominates in battery endurance (up to a month) the5krunner.com, Apple Watch Ultra 2 offers all-day and then some (1.5–2 days) which is much improved over regular smartwatches apple.com, and Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra falls in a similar 2-day window under normal use, maybe slightly more with aggressive power saving dcrainmaker.com. It’s a classic trade-off: the smarter/more vivid the watch, the more often it needs charging. Garmin has chosen longevity over some “smart” features, and it shows.

Pricing & Value

These flagship watches command premium prices, but their value propositions differ.

• Apple Watch Ultra 2 is priced at $799 (USD) for the 49 mm titanium model (with cellular included) apple.com. In Apple’s lineup it’s the top-priced Apple Watch, above the Series models. For that $799, you get the most rugged Apple Watch with unique capabilities (depth gauge, siren, dual-frequency GPS, etc.) and a strong stainless steel or alpine loop band included. Apple kept the price the same as the first Ultra despite adding a new black titanium option and upgraded internals. Given Apple’s ecosystem and the watch’s build, many enthusiasts find it a fair price for what is essentially a high-end sport watch plus a mini-smartphone on wrist. It undercuts some Garmin high-end models in price, which is notable – e.g., Garmin’s MARQ luxe watches or Tactix are more expensive. However, it is still significantly more than typical smartwatch or fitness watch prices. If you’re an iPhone user comparing value, the Ultra 2 is roughly double the cost of an Apple Watch Series 10 (~$399 starting), but it offers much more durability, battery, and niche features. Apple has a strong value proposition for iPhone owners who want a do-it-all watch – it’s tough enough for mountain trails but also polished for daily wear.
• Garmin Tactix 7 AMOLED comes at a steep price of $1,399.99 (USD) MSRP the5krunner.com. This high price reflects its professional-grade feature set. It is one of Garmin’s most expensive wearables (only the luxury MARQ series costs more, and special editions like the Ballistics might add a bit). For perspective, you could almost buy two Apple Ultra 2 watches for the price of one Tactix 7. Garmin is charging for the premium materials (titanium/sapphire), the large battery and advanced tech (night vision, etc.), and the extensive mapping and sensor capabilities. In terms of value, if you need what Tactix offers (true offline maps, military features, insane battery, ANT+ connectivity, etc.), then there aren’t many alternatives – and the cost might be justified as a tool for your profession or serious hobby. Many outdoor professionals or ultra-endurance athletes consider it an investment akin to a high-grade instrument. However, for more casual users, the price can be hard to swallow. Garmin does offer cheaper alternatives like the Fenix or Epix series (e.g., Epix Pro with AMOLED, similar size, for a few hundred less) – one might argue the Tactix is a bit niche (you’re paying extra for the tactical styling and features like Stealth, NVG, which not everyone needs). In pure value terms, the Tactix 7 is the most expensive but also the most capable in specific domains. It’s worth it if those capabilities are mission-critical for you; otherwise, Garmin’s lower models or even Apple/Samsung could offer better bang for buck for more general use.
• Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra undercuts both at around $599–$699 (USD) depending on sales and configurations. The 2024 model launched at $649 for the 47 mm LTE model dcrainmaker.com. By 2025, we see prices around $599 on some carriers or promotions. This pricing puts it roughly $150 less than Apple’s Ultra at retail. Samsung thus positions the Galaxy Watch Ultra as a slightly more affordable “ultra” option. Considering the tech inside (titanium build, LTE, OLED, advanced sensors), it’s a strong value for Android users. You’re essentially getting all the premium hardware for less than Apple’s equivalent – and way less than Garmin’s. However, part of this is because Samsung’s watch still relies on a phone for full use (like Apple’s), whereas the Garmin can be seen as a standalone tool. Also, Samsung has to price competitively in the Android space since there are other players (Pixel Watch 2/3 at $349, for example, though those aren’t “ultra” models). Many reviewers have praised the Galaxy Watch Ultra for giving a robust feature set at a price significantly below some Garmin multisport watches, making features like dual-frequency GPS and high-end materials more accessible to the mainstream dcrainmaker.com. If you’re an Android user who balked at paying $800+ for an Apple or a Garmin, the Galaxy Watch Ultra at ~$649 might feel like a “bargain” of the high-end smartwatch world.

Value vs Use Case: Ultimately, value depends on what you need:

• For iPhone users, the Apple Watch Ultra 2 at $799 is often deemed worth it if you will utilize its extra battery life and durability. It’s priced in line with Apple’s premium image but also competitive given its tech. If you only need smart features and basic fitness, a cheaper Apple Watch could do – but none of those can survive a rugged hike or multi-hour swim like the Ultra can. So if you need those extras, the price is justified by the combination of smartwatch and tough sports watch in one.
• For those wanting absolute best fitness/outdoor functionality regardless of phone, Garmin’s $1.4k price could be justified. However, Garmin offers other models like the Fenix 7/8 series (often $700–$900) or even the newer Epix Pro (around $900) that give 90% of the features. The Tactix adds tactical-specific features and that sleek subdued look. Some users pay the premium simply because they love the design (all-black, no Garmin logo on front, nylon band) or because they require Stealth/NVG modes. It’s somewhat analogous to a specialized pro tool. In terms of longevity, Garmin watches also often get many years of software support and hold value decently in the second-hand market (because someone will still want a good Garmin for outdoor use even if it’s older).
• For Android users wanting premium on a relative budget, Samsung offers a lot of watch for the money. It doesn’t have the multi-week battery, but not everyone needs that. At nearly half the price of the Tactix, the Galaxy Watch Ultra is a strong value if you desire a top-tier smartwatch that is also capable for fitness. It also frequently sees discounts (e.g., carriers bundling it, Black Friday deals). The one caution: Wear OS watches typically have a lifespan of maybe 2–3 years of OS updates, and battery health will decline. Garmin’s might last longer physically and get feature updates for many years (Garmin tends to keep adding features to older models too). Apple’s sit in between – usually about 4–5 years of support.

In conclusion on pricing: Apple Watch Ultra 2 – $799: Premium but arguably justified by its high-end build and dual role as smartwatch + sport watch in one apple.com. Garmin Tactix 7 – $1399: Expensive and targeted at those who need its extreme capabilities; a powerhouse device at a powerhouse price the5krunner.com. Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra – $649: Most affordable of the trio, aiming to deliver 90% of the “ultra” experience at a lower cost dcrainmaker.com. Depending on your ecosystem and needs, the value equation shifts. If you’re budget sensitive and on Android, Samsung wins. If you’re an outdoor pro, the Garmin might be worth every penny. If you’re in Apple-land and want a rugged wearable, the Ultra 2 is priced reasonably given that it can replace a running watch, a dive computer, and a day-to-day smartwatch in one device. All three are investment pieces – but they offer top-tier experiences that, for many users, are well worth the price of admission.

User & Expert Impressions

What are reviewers and users saying about these devices? Let’s highlight some notable commentary:

• Apple Watch Ultra 2: Tech reviewers generally agree that the Ultra 2 is a successful refinement of an already excellent watch. It didn’t reinvent anything major, but the new S9 chip and brighter screen make it even more capable. Many applauded the new black titanium finish, which was a cosmetic update people “clamored for” – AppleInsider noted that the black matte coating is “incredibly cool and stylish”, fulfilling a big request from fans appleinsider.com. Performance-wise, the consensus is that Ultra 2 is not a must-upgrade from Ultra 1 since it’s “fundamentally the same device” with some tweaks appleinsider.com. However, for those new to Ultra, it’s a superb watch. Business Insider’s review highlighted that “the Apple Watch Ultra 2 remains Apple’s top option for outdoor enthusiasts and those who want longer battery life”, and is “one of the best smartwatches overall” businessinsider.com businessinsider.com. They emphasized it’s Apple’s best for fitness and adventure, now even adding things like sleep apnea detection and offline maps via watchOS updates businessinsider.com. Many users praise how Apple managed to make a watch that feels premium enough to wear anywhere but durable enough to take on hikes and dives. Some early Ultra adopters mention they love not worrying about their watch at the beach or on the trail – something not true of earlier Apple Watches. Criticisms include: it’s still an Apple Watch at heart, meaning battery life – while better – is nowhere near Garmin’s. Also, it’s big (49 mm) which might not suit very small wrists, and of course, it’s only for iPhone users. But overall, satisfaction is high; as one reviewer put it after a year of use, “Even better than at launch… The battery life is fantastic – at least for an Apple Watch.” forums.appleinsider.com.
• Garmin Tactix 7 AMOLED: Among enthusiasts, the Tactix 7 AMOLED edition has been met with excitement because it combined Garmin’s proven Fenix platform with a vibrant screen and tactical features. Experts like The5KRunner praised the display as “excellent… easy to read even in bright sunlight” and the addition of ultra-low dimness for stealth the5krunner.com. The build quality and rugged features receive universal acclaim – it’s understood this watch can take a beating. Reviewers often call it “the pinnacle of Garmin” for 2023 the5krunner.com, noting that it basically has every feature Garmin offers. The $1400 price is a sticking point for some; casual reviewers might say it’s overkill unless you truly use the tactical functions. For those who do use them, user forums are filled with positive notes: e.g., military personnel or pilots appreciating the dual-format GPS and Jumpmaster, and ultra athletes raving about going for a whole 2-week trip without charging. One Reddit user comparing Apple Ultra vs Tactix mentioned Garmin is “for people that need battery life, accurate GPS and exercise metrics… if you don’t need these, you may find [a smartwatch like Apple] more fun” reddit.com – which nicely sums up the divide. The Gen 5 HR sensor’s improved accuracy got a nod the5krunner.com, and features like the dimmable green flashlight and Red Shift mode for night use have been praised as thoughtful additions for tactical and nocturnal users the5krunner.com the5krunner.com. Essentially, experts say if you’re the target user (tactical or extreme outdoors), the Tactix AMOLED leaves little to be desired – it’s hard to go back to anything else once you rely on its battery and features. Ray Maker (DC Rainmaker) hasn’t published a specific Tactix review as of writing, but his Fenix/Epix reviews cover similar ground: great accuracy, improved display, albeit a hefty price and still somewhat clunky interface for newbies. Another perspective: some longtime Garmin fans were initially wary of AMOLED affecting battery, but impressions show Garmin managed it well – you still get Garmin-level endurance (31 days, etc.) the5krunner.com, which is a revelation: an AMOLED watch you don’t have to charge every day. That’s a strong positive impression in itself.
• Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra: The Galaxy Watch Ultra’s debut marked Samsung’s attempt to go head-to-head with Apple’s Ultra and Garmin’s offerings. Many tech reviewers were pleased to see Samsung “finally throw everything and the kitchen sink” into a smartwatch. Design-wise, it’s sometimes playfully called “Apple Watch Ultra in a Galaxy flavor” because of the orange accents and rugged marketing. DC Rainmaker’s in-depth review title was telling: “Finally Accurate?” – and indeed he concludes that Samsung mostly delivered on improved accuracy in GPS and heart rate dcrainmaker.com. He points out that it took a decade, but Samsung’s serious push (multi-band GPS, better sensor) made the Ultra a credible fitness device dcrainmaker.com. He also noted the irony that Apple and Samsung lock their ecosystems, often meaning a Garmin is the neutral competitor for each dcrainmaker.com. Mainstream reviews (e.g., Tom’s Guide, Android Central) have been positive: they laud the bright display and robust feature set at a lower price than Apple. Tom’s Guide called the original 2024 Ultra “one of the best Samsung smartwatches” and were glad Samsung committed to making it a series (a 2025 follow-up is here, proving it wasn’t one-and-done) tomsguide.com tomsguide.com. Common praises include the sharp AMOLED display, smooth performance, and rich app ecosystem. People also love the versatility – you can go from tracking a run with HR and GPS to streaming Spotify on LTE to paying for a coffee, all from the watch. The main criticisms have been battery life (still not multi-day if you use it heavily) and some confusion over design choices (like the non-functional rotating bezel). Some hardcore Android users note that while it’s great, if you don’t specifically need the rugged features, a Galaxy Watch6 Classic might be cheaper and sufficient. But those who bought it generally report high satisfaction, enjoying not worrying if it gets wet or knocked. The 85 dB siren is an interesting talking point; some testers tried it and found it loud, albeit maybe more of a “nice to have” for peace of mind. Summing up impressions: it’s seen as Samsung’s best smartwatch yet for athletes, finally bridging some of the gap with Garmin by adding things like triathlon mode and better accuracy. One reviewer on Tom’s Guide even hoped for more like blood glucose in future models, showing how Samsung is pushing innovation (we’ll touch on that next) tomsguide.com.

In short, user and expert feedback paints this picture: Apple Watch Ultra 2 – highly polished, great for iPhone adventurers, incremental upgrade but still top of its class for an Apple user. Garmin Tactix 7 – a beast of a tool, beloved by those who truly need its features, with its only downsides being high cost and a bit of complexity for casual users. Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra – a welcome “ultra” option for Android, much improved in accuracy and capability, offering tremendous functionality, with battery life the only notable Achilles’ heel compared to Garmin. As one might expect, customer satisfaction correlates strongly with staying within ecosystem: iPhone users rave about Ultra, Android users (especially Samsung phone owners) rave about Galaxy Ultra, and serious outdoor folks rave about Garmin – each in their element.

The Road Ahead: Upcoming Models & Future Innovations

The smartwatch landscape is ever-evolving. Here we’ll explore what’s known and rumored about upcoming models from Apple, Garmin, Samsung, and others, including official announcements and credible leaks that hint at the future of this “ultra” segment.

Apple: Watch Ultra 3 and Beyond

Apple did not release a new Ultra in 2024 (instead refreshing Ultra 2 with a new color and watchOS features businessinsider.com), which means anticipation is high for an Apple Watch Ultra 3, expected in late 2025. Leaks and rumors suggest it will be a significant upgrade to reward the two-year wait 9to5mac.com. According to insiders and reports compiled by Tom’s Guide, the Watch Ultra 3 is likely to launch in September 2025 alongside the iPhone 17 series tomsguide.com.

Display Upgrades: The headline rumor is Apple could introduce a MicroLED display on the Ultra 3. MicroLED is next-gen screen tech that offers OLED-like contrast but with greater brightness, efficiency, and no burn-in. An analyst report from early 2023 claimed Apple will use a MicroLED panel in an Apple Watch by late 2025, likely the Ultra since it’s the premium model appleinsider.com. MicroLED could make the Ultra’s display even brighter and sharper. In fact, code found in iOS 26 beta indicates the Ultra 3 will have a slightly larger display resolution of 422×514 (vs 410×502 on Ultra 2) macworld.com. This suggests Apple might be trimming bezels to expand the screen size a bit. No increase in case size is rumored, so it might just be more edge-to-edge. MicroLED could be the enabler for that and could allow brightness well above 3000 nits, perhaps in the 4000–5000 nit range, making it easily visible in any glare (or even usable as a rudimentary flashlight). However, some reports in 2024 said MicroLED plans hit supplier snags (Apple allegedly canceled some contracts) the5krunner.com, so it’s not 100% certain. AppleInsider notes there were even rumors that TAG Heuer might beat Apple to a MicroLED watch since it can charge more for it the5krunner.com. If MicroLED doesn’t make it in time, Apple might stick with an upgraded OLED, but the consensus is that Apple Watch Ultra 3 is the likely candidate to debut MicroLED when it’s ready appleinsider.com.

New Sensors & Features: Apple continuously works on health sensors. For 2025, no entirely new health sensor is expected (like glucose or blood pressure) – those are still in development and likely years away macworld.com. However, there’s talk Apple might refine existing sensors or add new uses: for instance, a trend is emerging around blood pressure monitoring via optical sensors and algorithms (similar to Samsung’s approach). Macworld reports high blood pressure detection isn’t ready for 2025 in Apple’s view macworld.com. Blood glucose non-invasively is a moonshot that probably won’t land until late decade. Instead, Apple might focus on connectivity and safety. A big rumor is that the Ultra 3 (and Series 11) could support 5G cellular and even satellite messaging macworld.com macworld.com. Satellite SOS debuted on iPhone 14; packing it into a watch would be huge for backcountry safety. Apple is reportedly working on a custom satellite modem (codenamed “C1”) to eventually bring satellite SOS to Apple Watch appleinsider.com. By 2025, it’s plausible – imagine being able to send an emergency text via satellite directly from your watch anywhere. That feature would encroach on Garmin’s territory (Garmin’s inReach devices cover that now). In addition to SOS, maybe simple text via satellite could be included. As for 5G, current Watches use 4G LTE; 5G could improve speed or coverage (especially with standalone capability), but also could hurt battery, so it’s a balance.

Another expected internal upgrade: a new Apple S10 or S11 chip (depending on naming). If Series 10 in 2024 had an S10, the Ultra 3 in 2025 might get an S11 chip, presumably with performance and efficiency gains, and perhaps more AI processing on-device. Apple is also big on AI (“Apple Intelligence”) integration; while the watch likely won’t run large language models onboard due to RAM limits, Apple may introduce features like AI-powered coaching or insights. In watchOS 26 (2025’s OS), a new “Workout Buddy” AI coach is expected to provide personalized training cues and motivation macworld.com. Apple might lean on the iPhone for heavy AI processing but have the Watch Ultra display the results – e.g., a voice in your AirPods encouraging you during a run, tailored by AI.

Design and Materials: Don’t expect a radical design change – the Ultra line will likely stick to the 49 mm rugged design, perhaps slimming down slightly. Macworld noted “all signs point to an Apple Watch [Series 11] identical in appearance to Series 10… as for Ultra 3, it might be slimmer” macworld.com. The Ultra’s design was well-received, so Apple will iterate, maybe reduce bezel, maybe offer new case colors (could we see a titanium “sky blue” to match new iPhones, as hinted by some rumors? macworld.com). Also, Apple might finally change the band attachment mechanism after a decade – there’s speculation Apple could switch it up, but it’s unclear if Ultra 3 or a later model will do that appleinsider.com. If they do, it could mean new band styles (but also make old bands incompatible, which Apple would be careful about given the band ecosystem).

Release Date and Pricing: Historically, Apple announces new Watches in September. So, September 2025 is a safe bet for Ultra 3 (unless Apple decides to move to a two-year cycle permanently, but rumor consensus is 2025 will indeed see Ultra 3) tomsguide.com. Pricing is expected to remain around $799. Macworld’s analysis expects no major hike: Ultra 3 from $799, Series 11 from $399, etc., as Apple has kept Watch prices steady for years macworld.com macworld.com. One wild card: if MicroLED significantly raises costs, Apple could either swallow it or possibly bump the price $50–100. But given economies of scale, $799 will likely stick (Apple can tout not raising price while adding features).

Longer-term Apple: Looking beyond Ultra 3, Apple is rumored to be exploring more sensors (like temperature sensors for wellness – already present but maybe expanding uses, or even ambient air quality sensors). There’s also talk of Apple Watch “X” in 2025 or 2026 to mark the 10th anniversary – perhaps a redesigned mainline watch. But for Ultra, after Ultra 3, next could be Ultra 4 in 2027 if a two-year cadence holds. By then, maybe we’ll see true innovations like microLED 2.0, blood pressure or glucose monitoring if technology catches up, and further satellite capabilities. In any case, Apple appears committed to the Ultra category – it filled a niche for a more hardcore Apple Watch, and its success means it’s here to stay and likely to get the latest and greatest tech Apple can develop for wearables.

Garmin: Next-Gen Fenix, Tactix & More

Garmin typically follows a somewhat different release rhythm, not yearly for each model but staggered across its families (Fenix, Epix, Forerunner, etc.). Recently, Garmin’s focus has been on rolling out AMOLED displays and incremental “Pro” upgrades to its lineup.

Fenix/Epix Series: In mid-to-late 2024, Garmin launched the Fenix 8 series and the Epix Pro (Gen 2) series (Epix is essentially an AMOLED Fenix). Now, rumors strongly suggest Fenix 8 Pro models are incoming in 2025, possibly as soon as spring or summer gadgetsandwearables.com. A leak in September 2024 (from Garmin’s own software) indicated Garmin has in development: Fenix 8 Pro (47mm and 51mm) and intriguingly a Fenix 8 MicroLED version the5krunner.com the5krunner.com. This matches speculation that Garmin might do a faster-than-usual refresh if new tech is ready (like MicroLED). The5KRunner’s leak suggests Garmin may release these as a “tranche” of models to bump hardware that the base Fenix 8 lacked the5krunner.com the5krunner.com. If that holds true, around mid-2025 we might see a Fenix 8 Pro with improvements like perhaps ECG (Garmin has FCC approval for ECG on the Venu 2 Plus, they could extend ECG to Fenix line), maybe a boost in storage or sensors, and possibly LTE or satellite messaging integration. There have been rumors Garmin is prototyping LTE/satellite directly in Fenix to counter Apple’s satellite plans youtube.com.

The MicroLED Fenix 8 leak is particularly exciting the5krunner.com. Garmin has been looking at MicroLED too – it’d allow them to have always-on bright displays with far less power draw than current AMOLED or MIP. However, MicroLED yields and costs are challenging. If Garmin does manage to release a Fenix 8 MicroLED in 2025, it could be a limited high-end SKU (maybe a test run, or possibly in a new MARQ first). The leak shows it labeled separate from Pro, implying it might be a special edition of Fenix 8. Garmin might aim to be among the first with MicroLED to leapfrog Apple – if, say, Apple’s MicroLED got delayed. In any case, mid-2025 Garmin Fenix updates are expected, likely called “Fenix 8 Pro” and maybe an “Epix Pro Gen 3” or similar. These will probably carry over features from newer niche models (for example, by then Garmin’s Enduro 3 or others might have new tricks, which they fold into Fenix Pro).

Tactix and Enduro: The Garmin Tactix line usually lags Fenix by a bit. Since Tactix 7 launched in early 2022 (with the non-AMOLED versions, then an AMOLED edition in late 2023), one could expect a Tactix 8 in the pipeline. Indeed, users on forums joked about waiting for Tactix 8 forums.garmin.com forums.garmin.com. If Garmin follows pattern, a Tactix 8 might come after Fenix 8 Pro – perhaps in late 2025 or early 2026, incorporating the latest tech (maybe MicroLED if Fenix did it, etc.). Given the popularity of the AMOLED edition, Garmin will likely keep an AMOLED option for Tactix 8. Also, we might see Ballistics edition continued (Tactix 7 had a “Pro Ballistics” variant with Applied Ballistics software).

For the ultra-endurance crowd, Garmin’s Enduro series (last was Enduro 2 in 2022) may also get an update. Enduro is like a stripped Fenix with maximal battery (solar, etc.). If Enduro 3 comes, possibly in 2025, it might integrate solar + AMOLED or MicroLED? Or Garmin might stick to MIP for Enduro to maximize battery.

New Features Expected: Garmin has been adding ECG to some lifestyle watches (Venu 2 Plus, new Venu 3 likely). It wouldn’t be surprising for Garmin to add ECG to the Fenix/Tactix line soon, especially since Apple and Samsung have it. Perhaps Fenix 8 Pro or Tactix 8 could quietly include an ECG sensor. Another area is blood pressure – Garmin partnered with Samsung to use Samsung’s sensor in a prototype, but nothing concrete yet. Possibly in a few years. Garmin might sooner incorporate satellite comm: maybe not full text via satellite (that might cannibalize inReach), but perhaps an SOS via satellite function if paired with your phone (using phone’s connection to Iridium via Garmin Messenger app, etc.). Or they might add a limited Iridium capability to watches in the far future. In the rumor mill, an interesting tidbit: Garmin apparently had references to “Satellite Communication” in Fenix 8 firmware – which could hint at something youtube.com.

Garmin Competitors & Ecosystem: Garmin’s main competitor in the pure sports realm is COROS, Suunto, Polar. COROS recently announced COROS Vertix 3 (2024) with dual-frequency GPS and improved battery – they compete on price (usually cheaper than Garmin). Suunto (now Finnish-owned again) released Suunto Vertical (2023) which boasted solar, dual-band GPS, 95 hours GPS battery – very Garmin-like stats. If anything, Garmin will respond by maintaining their feature lead. We might see Garmin add more AI training insights too (everyone’s doing AI). For example, using AI to analyze your workout history and giving more natural language feedback. They already have Training Readiness and such, but the presentation might become more “coaching buddy”.

Value and Market Implications: Garmin releasing AMOLED versions (like Epix, Tactix AMOLED) was a response to consumer demand for better displays (and indirectly, to Apple’s encroachment into high-end fitness wearables). If Apple Ultra 3 comes with MicroLED and satellite, Garmin will want to match or outdo that for their user base. The presence of Apple and Samsung in the “adventure watch” space is pushing Garmin to innovate on display and smart features, while Garmin’s strengths in battery and nav push Apple/Samsung to improve those aspects. The competition is great for consumers. Price-wise, Garmin likely stays premium ($800+ for Fenix Pro, $1000+ for Tactix). But they may also streamline their lineup (the rumor that Fenix 8 was rushed or a “cash grab” implies Garmin might adjust strategy to avoid backlash the5krunner.com).

Samsung: Galaxy Watch Ultra 2025 and Galaxy Watch 9?

Samsung embraced an annual cycle for its watches. In mid-2025, they launched the Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025) alongside the Galaxy Watch 8 and 8 Classic. According to leaks (from Evan Blass) and hands-ons, the 2025 Ultra is very similar to the 2024 model with minor tweaks in design (e.g., orange notches on the bezel, new band colors) tomsguide.com. This suggests Samsung treated it as an iterative update – likely calling it just “Galaxy Watch Ultra” with a year tag in marketing.

Key changes in the 2025 model revolve around software (One UI Watch 8) and new health features. Samsung introduced:

• Run Coaching and improved sleep tracking as built-in features tomsguide.com.
• An Antioxidant Index metric to assess wellness (possibly related to stress and recovery) tomsguide.com.
• Deeper integration with Google’s Gemini AI (Gemini is Google’s upcoming AI model). There’s talk that One UI 8 watch brings new smart suggestions and possibly on-device AI for text prompts or health analysis tomsguide.com.
• Support for new sensors like UWB (the 2024 Ultra already had UWB for SmartThings Find, maybe the 2025 uses it more).

Hardware-wise, the 2025 Ultra did not drastically change: same 47 mm, likely same display and battery. Perhaps a new color (the leak mentioned a “Titanium Blue” option) samsung.com. Price remained around $649 (some hints it might even drop slightly or see promos more frequently as Samsung refines costs) reddit.com.

Looking forward, what about a Galaxy Watch Ultra 2 (or 2026)? TechRadar notes no concrete leaks for an “Ultra 2” yet, but expects Samsung to continue annually techradar.com. If they follow naming akin to phones, maybe the 2025 version was effectively “Ultra 2” (though not marketed as such), and a 2026 could be “Ultra 3”. We can expect Samsung will:

• Possibly increase battery life further (maybe a larger battery or more efficient chip).
• Consider adding MicroLED eventually, especially if Apple/garmin do – Samsung is a display leader, they could manufacture microLED for themselves. Perhaps by 2026/27 a microLED Galaxy Watch could appear.
• Work on new health sensors: Samsung has been reportedly working on non-invasive blood glucose monitoring. They nearly introduced it in 2023 but it wasn’t ready tomsguide.com. Rumors suggest they’re still working on it – if they crack it, a future Galaxy Watch could be first with glucose tracking for diabetics (a game-changer, but timeline uncertain).
• They might integrate more of their own ecosystem like Galaxy Ring (Samsung has a smart ring prototype). A future watch might work in tandem with a ring, or share health data for more accuracy.

In terms of Galaxy Watch 9 (non-Ultra): If Watch 8 came in 2025, then Watch 9 likely 2026. Those usually get new processors, new designs (the Watch8 introduced a new “squircle” shape, maybe Watch9 refines that). The Classic line will likely continue as well with the physical rotating bezel fans love. The Ultra might adopt that rotating bezel eventually if user demand persists – who knows, Samsung could bring it back as a differentiator (“Ultra 3 with rotating bezel”).

One big area Samsung pushes is integration with Galaxy phones and ecosystem AI: e.g., using the watch to trigger phone cameras, control presentations, etc. With Android 14/15, more unified device experiences (like Google’s seamless device switching) might come. So expect Ultra watches to further integrate – maybe controlling Samsung AR glasses or other devices if they come.

Market-wise, Samsung’s Ultra is now a fixture, showing Samsung’s commitment to compete in the high-end rugged segment. It ensures Android users have an answer to Apple Ultra and high-end Garmin, without leaving their ecosystem. This competition likely will keep Samsung innovating especially in sensor tech and AI to stand out, since Garmin will usually win on battery/nav, and Apple on seamless polish.

Other Competitors: Google, Huawei, and More

Aside from the big three, there are other players with notable moves:

• Google Pixel Watch: Google’s Pixel Watch (gen 1 in 2022, gen 2 in late 2023) is more of a sleek everyday smartwatch, not a direct Ultra competitor. Pixel Watch 2 added better battery (still ~24h), new sensors (continuous skin temperature, stress sensing via cEDA, etc.). Looking ahead, a Pixel Watch 3 likely in late 2024 and a Pixel Watch 4 in 2025. Tom’s Guide has rumor roundups for Pixel Watch 4 already tomsguide.com. While Pixel watches won’t be “rugged/outdoors” in design (they prioritize style), Google is certainly adding more health and fitness features (it owns Fitbit). Pixel Watch 3/4 might bring longer battery and more Fitbit-derived training analytics. They are competitors in the broad smartwatch market but not directly for someone who needs an Ultra-level durability or battery. However, Pixel Watch offers a premium smartwatch for Android at $350-$400 – significantly cheaper, albeit not as tough. Some who want smart features but not necessarily a dive-capable watch might opt for Pixel Watch over Samsung Ultra due to size or price.
• Huawei: Huawei has actually made waves in the adventure watch space. The Huawei Watch Ultimate (launched 2023) is a direct competitor to Apple Watch Ultra: it has a titanium case, 100m water resistance (EN13319 certified for diving), dual-frequency GNSS, and even offers scuba dive modes. It lacks third-party apps (it’s HarmonyOS), but it’s very feature-packed (even ECG in China version). A Huawei Watch Ultimate 2 is in the works; leaks suggest it will have UWB and two-way satellite SMS support huaweicentral.com huaweicentral.com. That’s notable: Huawei might beat Apple to integrating satellite messaging on a watch. It also indicates a likely launch in late 2024 (Huawei often does yearly or 18-month cycles). Huawei’s presence is bigger in Europe and Asia (no official US due to sanctions). They also just launched Watch GT 5 (a mid-tier sporty watch). Huawei’s Ultimate line underlines that competition: they claim 14-day battery, ultra-hard materials (liquid metal case on gen1), etc. If Ultimate 2 adds satellite, that will push others.
• Suunto & Polar: Suunto released the Suunto Vertical in 2023 – solar charging, huge battery (up to 60 days in watch mode, 85h GPS), offline maps – clearly targeting Fenix. Suunto’s next could be a Suunto 10 series (since Suunto 9 Peak Pro came 2022). Suunto has fewer resources but a loyal following for ultra reliability and simple UI. They’ve partnered with LifeQ for advanced biometrics, so new Suunto watches might have improved recovery metrics. Polar, known for accuracy in training, hasn’t done a rugged watch since the Grit X Pro (2021). They might be due for a new outdoor watch too. Polar’s focus is often on new algorithms (like their great sleep and cardio load insights). They may integrate more recovery metrics or go for an AMOLED screen next.
• Casio / Others: Casio continues its G-Shock smartwatches (they have Wear OS-powered G-Squad). They’re niche but for an ultra-rugged need (MIL-STD, etc). We might see updates with newer Wear OS versions. Also, Garmin’s luxury MARQ Gen 3 came out in 2023 – essentially Fenix in luxury materials for >$2000. That’s a small segment but shows there’s market at high-end as well. Even mechanical watchmakers like Tag Heuer with their Connected series occasionally do special editions (Tag had a Super Mario one, etc.) – rumor said Tag might use MicroLED (as per The5KRunner’s comment) the5krunner.com.

Potential Improvements Across the Board: A general trend likely in upcoming models for all brands:

• Better displays without battery compromise – whether via MicroLED or other efficiencies.
• More AI-driven features – e.g., personalized coaching, smarter battery management (AI predicting your usage to adjust settings), etc.
• Interoperability with other devices – watches acting as health hubs connecting to rings, smart glasses, etc. Apple and Google especially.
• Environmental sensors – e.g., temperature (Apple already logs ambient), perhaps even humidity or air quality (for outdoor air index, useful to athletes). Some patents show Apple exploring hydration sensors via sweat – maybe far off, but not impossible in some years.

Market Implications: The competition is heating up. Apple raising the bar with Ultra forced Garmin to improve displays and add lifestyle features (like improved sleep tracking, HRV status). Garmin pushing battery and maps forced Apple to address navigation (topo maps in watchOS 10) and consider satellite tech. Samsung’s entry validated the “Ultra” concept on Android, likely pulling some who might’ve considered a Garmin back into the Samsung fold. With Huawei innovating (satellite SMS), Apple and Garmin definitely take note – we could see a tech leap where by 2026, all top watches have some satellite capability for emergencies, which would be a big safety net improvement for users.

Ultimately, consumers can look forward to more choices in the rugged premium smartwatch category. Prices may remain high for bleeding-edge tech (especially MicroLED initially), but features that debut in $800–$1400 watches eventually trickle down to mid-range ones, benefiting all. The upcoming models from each player aim to one-up each other: Apple with a possibly slimmer, brighter Ultra 3 with satellite SOS and MicroLED appleinsider.com macworld.com, Garmin with Fenix 8 Pro and maybe MicroLED plus even longer battery the5krunner.com the5krunner.com, Samsung refining its Ultra yearly with better software and perhaps new health metrics like glucose if achievable tomsguide.com. And don’t count out newcomers – e.g., there are rumors of other Chinese brands like Xiaomi plotting high-end sports watches too.

In conclusion, the next few years will see smartwatches becoming even more powerful health companions and safety devices, blurring lines between medical gadget, adventure tool, and everyday assistant. Whether you’re Team Apple, Team Garmin, Team Samsung – or just an interested observer – the future looks bright (literally, if those new displays pan out) and packed with innovation that will continue to redefine what a watch can do on your wrist.

Conclusion

The Apple Watch Ultra 2, Garmin Tactix 7 AMOLED, and Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra represent the pinnacle of smartwatch technology in 2025 – each excelling in different arenas. The Ultra 2 is the ultimate iPhone companion, seamlessly blending everyday smartwatch smarts with true adventure-ready features in a premium package. The Tactix 7 AMOLED is a tour de force of endurance and capability, offering unmatched battery life, comprehensive mapping, and tactical tools – literally a wrist-mounted command center for extreme users willing to pay top dollar the5krunner.com. The Galaxy Watch Ultra strikes a balance, delivering a robust outdoors-capable feature set within the vibrant, app-rich world of Wear OS, at a slightly more accessible price dcrainmaker.com.

Choosing between them comes down to your priorities and ecosystem. If you live in the Apple ecosystem and want a watch that can go from office to ocean, the Ultra 2 is tailor-made – as one review put it, it’s Apple’s best watch “for fitness and outdoor enthusiasts” and one of the best smartwatches period businessinsider.com businessinsider.com. If you need a reliable instrument for multi-week expeditions, ultra-endurance races, or mission-critical scenarios, Garmin’s Tactix is in a league of its own – rugged, reliable, and feature-packed for the field the5krunner.com the5krunner.com. And if you’re an Android user seeking a top-tier, do-it-all smartwatch that finally doesn’t compromise on fitness accuracy, the Galaxy Watch Ultra is a fantastic choice – reviewers celebrate that Samsung “finally delivered” a serious sports watch contender dcrainmaker.com, while still retaining the rich smartwatch experience.

Looking ahead, the competition is set to intensify. Apple’s Watch Ultra 3 in 2025 may bring microLED displays and satellite SOS appleinsider.com macworld.com, potentially redefining the premium standard. Garmin’s upcoming Fenix/Tactix iterations are likely to adopt cutting-edge tech to keep hardcore adventurers loyal – leaks hint at microLED and further Pro enhancements the5krunner.com the5krunner.com. Samsung’s next Ultras will continue to push the envelope for Android users, possibly integrating advanced health sensors and AI coaching tomsguide.com. Meanwhile, other players like Huawei, Google (Pixel), Suunto, and Polar are innovating in their niches, ensuring no complacency at the top.

For consumers, this means more choice and better features each year. The gap between a smartwatch and a dedicated sports watch has narrowed significantly – these three devices prove you can have one watch that tracks a marathon or a mountain hike with scientific precision, helps in an emergency with a siren or SOS, and still lets you pay for a coffee or check messages on the go. The “ultra” smartwatch category has matured, and with credible rumors of big upgrades on the horizon, it’s an exciting time to be in the market for a high-end wearable.

In summary, the Apple Watch Ultra 2, Garmin Tactix 7 AMOLED, and Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra each earn their “Ultra” name in different ways – through ecosystem integration, endurance and features, or all-round versatility. Whichever you choose, you’re getting a flagship device that showcases the very best of what 2025’s smartwatch technology can offer, with even greater things just beyond the horizon.

Sources:

• Apple Watch Ultra 2 – Apple official website apple.com apple.com; AppleInsider review appleinsider.com; Business Insider review businessinsider.com businessinsider.com; DCRainmaker Apple Ultra 2 review dcrainmaker.com dcrainmaker.com.
• Garmin Tactix 7 AMOLED – The5KRunner review the5krunner.com the5krunner.com the5krunner.com; The5KRunner news on Garmin leaks the5krunner.com; Official Garmin specs via The5KRunner the5krunner.com the5krunner.com.
• Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra – DC Rainmaker review dcrainmaker.com dcrainmaker.com; Tom’s Guide hands-on (2025 leak) tomsguide.com tomsguide.com; AndroidCentral news androidcentral.com.
• Expert commentary – DC Rainmaker on Apple vs Samsung vs Garmin dcrainmaker.com; Business Insider on Ultra 2’s position businessinsider.com; Tom’s Guide on Samsung’s commitment tomsguide.com tomsguide.com.
• Upcoming models – Macworld on Apple Watch 2025 plans macworld.com macworld.com; AppleInsider on Ultra 3 rumors (MicroLED, satellite) appleinsider.com appleinsider.com; The5KRunner on Garmin Fenix 8 leaks the5krunner.com; Tom’s Guide on Samsung One UI 8 features tomsguide.com tomsguide.com; HuaweiCentral on Watch Ultimate 2 leak huaweicentral.com.