Published: November 30, 2025
Key takeaways
- Price & size: Microsoft stock last closed at about $492 per share on Friday, November 28, giving the company a market capitalization near $3.7 trillion, just ~11% below its July all‑time high around $555. [1]
- New governance flashpoint: Norway’s $2 trillion sovereign wealth fund, one of Microsoft’s largest shareholders, said today it will vote against management on a key human‑rights proposal and oppose Satya Nadella’s re‑election as board chair and his pay package at the December 5 AGM. [2]
- Institutional flows: Several wealth managers disclosed modest trims to their MSFT stakes, while big asset managers such as BlackRock and Goldman Sachs added millions of shares in Q3, underscoring a tug‑of‑war between profit‑taking and long‑term bullish positioning. [3]
- Fundamentals: Fiscal 2026 Q1 results showed revenue up 18% year over year to $77.7 billion, with Azure and other cloud services up 40%, and non‑GAAP EPS up 23%. [4]
- Street view: Analyst trackers show a “Strong Buy” / “Buy” consensus and average 12‑month price targets around $628–$631, implying roughly high‑20s percent upside versus recent prices – but with growing debate about AI spending, valuation, and ESG risk. [5]
Where Microsoft stock stands on November 30, 2025
With U.S. markets closed for the weekend, the latest trading reference for Microsoft Corporation (NASDAQ: MSFT) is Friday’s close around $492 per share. Different data providers show tiny rounding differences, but all cluster essentially at $492. [6]
That price:
- Leaves Microsoft about 11% below its July 30, 2025 all‑time high near $555.45. [7]
- Values the company at roughly $3.6–$3.7 trillion, keeping it firmly in the top tier of the world’s largest public companies alongside Apple and Alphabet. [8]
- Implies a price/earnings ratio around 35 and a PEG ratio near 2.4, based on recent MarketBeat and brokerage snapshots. [9]
According to Quiver Quantitative, MSFT rose about 4% over the past week, rebounding from a post‑earnings pullback but still trading below its recent 50‑day moving average near $510. [10]
On a longer horizon, the stock’s compounding remains striking: StatMuse data show that between November 30, 2000 and November 30, 2025, Microsoft’s share price has gained roughly 2,500%. [11]
Today’s big story: Norway’s wealth fund challenges Microsoft on human rights and CEO power
The most consequential Microsoft stock headline on November 30, 2025 comes from Norway’s Government Pension Fund Global, the world’s largest sovereign wealth fund.
In a statement reported by Reuters today, the $2 trillion fund said it will vote for a shareholder proposal at Microsoft’s December 5 annual general meeting that demands a report on the risks of operating in countries with significant human‑rights concerns. [12]
Key points from the fund’s stance:
- It holds about 1.35% of Microsoft’s shares, a stake worth roughly $50 billion as of June 30, making it Microsoft’s eighth‑largest shareholder. [13]
- Microsoft’s board and management have recommended voting against the proposal, meaning Norway’s fund is openly breaking with management on a sensitive ESG issue. [14]
- The fund argues that Microsoft’s board must better account for “material sustainability risks” and the broader social impacts of its products and operations. [15]
In a further challenge to corporate governance at the software giant, the fund also said it will:
- Vote against reappointing Satya Nadella as chair of the board, in line with its long‑standing policy against CEOs also serving as board chair.
- Vote against Nadella’s pay package, criticising U.S. executive compensation as excessive and calling for a larger share of pay to be locked‑up stock with long holding periods (five to ten years). [16]
Why this matters for MSFT shareholders
- Signalling effect, not immediate control change Norway’s fund does not control Microsoft, but as a top‑10 shareholder and a widely followed voice on ESG, its stance can influence other institutions’ voting behaviour and expectations about Microsoft’s governance trajectory.
- ESG and geopolitical risk premium The proposal targets human‑rights risk tied to Microsoft’s operations and customers in sensitive regions. That intersects with cloud, AI, and government‑contract exposure, and could affect how investors price long‑term legal, regulatory, and reputational risk in MSFT. [17]
- Growing activism around Microsoft’s policies Earlier this month, ADL and JLens urged shareholders to vote against a separate BDS‑aligned Proposal 9 at the same AGM, underscoring how Microsoft has become a focal point for activist campaigns that cut across human rights, geopolitics, and corporate responsibility. [18]
- Context: Microsoft’s own human‑rights reporting Microsoft already publishes a Human Rights Report and has expanded responsible AI and integrity disclosures. But shareholders behind the new resolution argue that existing reports may not adequately address risks in specific “hotspot” jurisdictions, especially where AI and cloud tools could be misused. [19]
In the near term, this is more likely to influence narrative and governance norms than day‑to‑day cash flows. But if large coalitions follow Norway’s lead, Microsoft may face stronger pressure to adjust where and how it deploys certain technologies – which could ultimately shape its growth opportunities in some markets.
Institutional moves: small trims, big accumulations
Alongside the governance story, fresh 13F‑based holdings data published today show several wealth managers tweaking their Microsoft positions:
- Hantz Financial Services Inc. cut its Microsoft stake by about 4.7% in Q2, selling just over 12,000 shares but still holding 245,407 shares worth roughly $122 million, with MSFT remaining its 10th‑largest position. [20]
- Northwest Financial Advisors reduced its stake by 86.5%, down to around 2,340 shares, though Microsoft still accounts for ~1.6% of its portfolio and remains a top‑20 holding. [21]
- Daymark Wealth Partners LLC trimmed its holdings by 1.1% but still owns nearly 298,000 shares, making Microsoft its third‑largest position at about 5.6% of assets. [22]
These moves look more like portfolio rebalancing than an exodus: each firm continues to hold Microsoft as a major line item, and the overall institutional ownership figure hovers around 71% of outstanding shares. [23]
Meanwhile, other data sets point the opposite way:
- Quiver Quantitative’s institutional dashboard shows BlackRock adding over 10.2 million shares and Goldman Sachs adding about 7.8 million shares in Q3, moves worth several billion dollars at recent prices. [24]
Net‑net, the ownership picture on November 30 looks like typical big‑tech churn: some advisors are taking profits after a multi‑year run, while mega‑funds continue to accumulate MSFT as a core AI and cloud platform holding.
Earnings and AI: the fundamental backdrop
Today’s governance headlines land on top of very strong – but increasingly scrutinised – fundamentals.
FY26 Q1: Cloud and AI drive a strong beat
In its fiscal 2026 Q1 report released on October 29, Microsoft posted: [25]
- Revenue: $77.7 billion, up 18% year‑on‑year (17% in constant currency)
- Operating income: $38.0 billion, up 24%
- GAAP net income: $27.7 billion, up 12%
- Non‑GAAP net income: $30.8 billion, up 22%
- GAAP EPS: $3.72, up 13%
- Non‑GAAP EPS: $4.13, up 23%
Business‑line highlights included:
- Microsoft Cloud revenue: $49.1 billion, up 26%; commercial remaining performance obligation (future contracted revenue) up 51% to $392 billion.
- Intelligent Cloud: $30.9 billion, up 28%, driven by Azure and other cloud services up 40%.
- Productivity & Business Processes: $33.0 billion, up 17%, alongside strong Microsoft 365 growth.
- More Personal Computing: $13.8 billion, up 4%, with modest growth in Windows, Xbox, and advertising. [26]
Microsoft also returned $10.7 billion to shareholders in the quarter through dividends and buybacks. [27]
Despite the beat, MSFT sold off after earnings, as investors digested heavier‑than‑expected AI capital expenditure, cautious commentary on margins, and broader tech volatility. Subsequent coverage from outlets like the Wall Street Journal and MarketWatch framed the move as part of a rotation away from mega‑cap tech after a powerful AI‑driven rally earlier in the year. [28]
Massive AI and cloud investments
Recent months have highlighted just how aggressively Microsoft is leaning into AI:
- A multi‑billion‑dollar cloud infrastructure deal with Anthropic and Nvidia in November positioned Microsoft Azure as a key backbone for Anthropic’s Claude models, with Microsoft committing up to $5 billion and Nvidia up to $10 billion in related infrastructure. [29]
- A separate initiative will see Microsoft invest $15.2 billion in the UAE by 2029, including equity in AI firm G42 and billions in regional AI datacenter infrastructure and operations. [30]
- At Microsoft Ignite 2025, the company unveiled Agent 365, expanded voice capabilities for Microsoft 365 Copilot, and tools for building enterprise‑grade agents in Windows 365 – signalling a strategy to bake “AI agents” into productivity, cloud, and endpoint experiences. [31]
These moves support the bull case that Microsoft remains one of the few companies capable of monetising AI at planet scale, but they also amplify worries about:
- Capex intensity and margins
- Regulatory exposure (competition, data use, and human‑rights issues)
- Execution risk in integrating AI into products like Windows without alienating users
Windows backlash and product‑level risks
Another thread relevant to the stock’s risk profile is the user backlash against Windows 11’s AI‑heavy direction.
In a widely shared Times of India piece published this week, Microsoft Windows chief Pavan Davuluri responded to criticism that Windows was becoming too “agentic” and less friendly to developers and power users. He acknowledged issues with reliability, performance, and inconsistent dialogs, stressing that the team “knows words aren’t enough” and must deliver tangible improvements while still pushing forward on AI experiences. [32]
For investors, this episode underlines:
- How tightly Microsoft has tied its brand to AI‑everywhere, from Windows to Office to Azure.
- The risk that over‑aggressive AI roll‑outs could trigger regulatory scrutiny or customer churn if users feel loss of control or privacy.
Combined with the Norway wealth fund’s focus on the broader “environmental and social consequences” of Microsoft’s products, the Windows backlash reinforces the sense that product design decisions now carry material ESG and reputational weight.
Dividends, valuation and long‑term returns
Dividend profile
Microsoft continues to pair high growth with a modest but steadily rising dividend:
- In September, the board raised the quarterly dividend to $0.91 per share, up from $0.83. [33]
- Dividend trackers estimate a forward yield around 0.7–0.75% at current prices, with an average dividend growth rate of about 10% per year over the last three years. [34]
The low yield reflects both Microsoft’s preference for reinvesting in AI and the market’s willingness to accept a growth‑stock multiple.
Valuation vs. Street expectations
Across multiple analyst aggregators:
- Microsoft holds a “Strong Buy” or “Buy” consensus rating, with the vast majority of firms rating it a buy and only a handful at hold. [35]
- Average 12‑month price targets sit around $628–$631 per share, with a range from about $500 (low) to $700 (high). That implies roughly 27–28% upside from the ~$492 recent price. [36]
- Recent target revisions include:
- Morgan Stanley lifting its target to $650 with an “overweight” rating,
- Wells Fargo at $700,
- Baird, Raymond James, Citigroup, Evercore, Bernstein, and others clustered in the $575–$675 range. [37]
That optimistic consensus sits alongside more cautious commentary. A widely cited Forbes column earlier in November argued that Microsoft’s valuation leaves room for a potential 30% downside if growth or AI adoption disappoints, pointing to the stock’s sharp 2021–2022 drawdown as a reminder of how quickly sentiment can reset. [38]
In other words, Wall Street broadly believes Microsoft deserves a premium multiple, but not everyone is convinced that the market has fully priced in AI capex, competition (especially from Alphabet), and ESG‑related headwinds. [39]
What today’s news means for Microsoft investors
Putting the November 30 headlines together, a few themes emerge for anyone tracking MSFT:
- ESG and governance are moving from footnote to front page.
Norway’s wealth fund isn’t simply asking for a better‑formatted report – it is drawing a direct line between human‑rights risk, executive pay, and long‑term shareholder value. Even if the proposal fails, a sizeable supporting vote could push Microsoft toward more detailed disclosures and stricter policies in sensitive markets. [40] - AI remains the growth engine – and the main risk.
Cloud, AI, and Copilot‑related businesses are driving double‑digit revenue and earnings growth, but they demand enormous investment and invite regulatory, user‑experience, and ethical scrutiny. Recent user backlash to Windows’ AI direction and questions about the social impact of Microsoft’s technologies tie directly into this. [41] - Ownership trends show conviction, not capitulation.
Some advisers are trimming positions after a huge multi‑year run, yet major institutions are still adding; Congress members and hedge funds continue to trade the stock actively; and Microsoft remains a heavyweight in key ETFs and global portfolios. [42] - Valuation is rich but not unheard‑of for a mega‑cap compounder.
A ~35x earnings multiple with a sub‑1% dividend yield is demanding, but bulls argue it’s warranted by 18% revenue growth, 26% cloud growth, and a massive pipeline of AI‑driven opportunities. Bears counter that any stumble – whether on growth, regulation, or governance – could compress that multiple quickly. [43]
As always, whether Microsoft stock is attractive at today’s prices depends on each investor’s time horizon, risk tolerance, and view on AI, regulation, and global governance trends.
Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, an offer, or a solicitation to buy or sell any security. Always do your own research or consult a licensed financial advisor before making investment decisions.
References
1. www.macrotrends.net, 2. www.reuters.com, 3. www.marketbeat.com, 4. www.microsoft.com, 5. stockanalysis.com, 6. www.macrotrends.net, 7. www.tradingview.com, 8. www.macrotrends.net, 9. www.marketbeat.com, 10. www.quiverquant.com, 11. www.statmuse.com, 12. www.reuters.com, 13. www.reuters.com, 14. www.reuters.com, 15. www.reuters.com, 16. www.reuters.com, 17. quartr.com, 18. www.investing.com, 19. www.sec.gov, 20. www.marketbeat.com, 21. www.marketbeat.com, 22. www.marketbeat.com, 23. www.marketbeat.com, 24. www.quiverquant.com, 25. www.microsoft.com, 26. www.microsoft.com, 27. www.microsoft.com, 28. www.reuters.com, 29. markets.financialcontent.com, 30. www.windowscentral.com, 31. www.crn.com, 32. timesofindia.indiatimes.com, 33. news.microsoft.com, 34. www.digrin.com, 35. www.marketbeat.com, 36. stockanalysis.com, 37. www.quiverquant.com, 38. www.forbes.com, 39. seekingalpha.com, 40. www.reuters.com, 41. www.microsoft.com, 42. www.marketbeat.com, 43. www.microsoft.com
