Seatrium Limited (SGX:5E2), the Singapore-based offshore and marine engineering group formed from the merger of Sembcorp Marine and Keppel Offshore & Marine, is ending 2025 in full “high drama” mode.
As of the morning of 5 December 2025, Seatrium’s share price is trading around S$2.12, down about 0.5% on the day and sitting in the middle of its 52‑week range of S$1.62 to S$2.60. The company’s market capitalisation is roughly S$7.2 billion, with a trailing price‑earnings ratio around 27x, a forward PE near 18x and a modest dividend yield of about 0.7%. [1]
Despite a healthy order book and improving margins, investors are wrestling with three big storylines:
- a US$475 million wind turbine installation vessel (WTIV) contract that has collapsed into London arbitration with a Maersk affiliate,
- a new deepwater floating production unit (FPU) contract for BP that lifts 2025 order wins above S$2 billion, and
- the aftershocks of Operation Car Wash corruption fines and related arbitration with Keppel. [2]
This article pulls together the latest news, forecasts and analysis as of 5 December 2025 for readers following Seatrium stock on Google News and Discover.
1. Seatrium stock today: price, valuation and long‑term performance
Price and basic metrics (5 Dec 2025)
Data from SGX-focused portals and global finance sites show that Seatrium shares are changing hands at about S$2.12, down roughly 0.47% intraday, with an intraday range around S$2.11–S$2.13. [3]
Key snapshot metrics (trailing 12 months, all in Singapore dollars unless noted): [4]
- Market cap: ~S$7.2 billion
- Revenue (TTM): ~S$10.6 billion
- Net income (TTM): ~S$265 million
- EPS (TTM): ~S$0.08
- PE (trailing): ~27x
- Forward PE: ~18x
- Price‑to‑book: ~1.1x
- Price‑to‑sales: ~0.68x
- Dividend (last 12 months): S$0.015–0.02 per share; yield ≈0.7% [5]
- 52‑week range: S$1.62 – S$2.60
- Beta (5Y monthly): ~0.29 (low volatility vs market) [6]
Five‑year returns: still underwater
Recent performance hasn’t been awful, but the longer view is sobering:
- Over the last 12 months, Seatrium delivered a total shareholder return (TSR) of about 7.8%, helped by modest share gains and dividends. [7]
- Over five years, shareholders are still down around 24% on a TSR basis and roughly 34% on the share price alone, according to Simply Wall St and other trackers. [8]
So Seatrium in late 2025 looks like a turnaround / re‑rating candidate, not a long‑term compounder that has already “made it”.
2. 2025: from corruption fines to margin recovery
Operation Car Wash settlement: a major overhang finally priced
In July 2025, Seatrium finally put a near‑decade‑long Brazilian corruption saga behind it:
- The company entered into a Deferred Prosecution Agreement (DPA) with Singapore’s Attorney‑General’s Chambers related to historical offences in Brazil. Under the DPA, Seatrium agreed to pay US$110 million to Singaporean authorities. [9]
- In parallel, Seatrium signed a leniency agreement in Brazil requiring payments of roughly BRL 728.9 million (≈US$110–130 million) to resolve investigations around its Estaleiro Jurong Aracruz yard and Petrobras‑linked contracts. [10]
In total, Seatrium expects to pay over S$240 million in combined penalties to Brazilian and Singaporean authorities. [11]
The market’s reaction was blunt:
- On 31 July 2025, shares fell about 5.4% intraday to S$2.27, making Seatrium the most‑traded stock on the SGX that day, despite simultaneously releasing strong first‑half results. [12]
Regulators made it clear that Seatrium must strengthen its ethics and compliance programme as part of the settlement – a non‑trivial ongoing cost, but also a de‑risking step that many institutional investors wanted to see. [13]
Strong first‑half 2025 results and margin expansion
The fines landed against a backdrop of sharply better operating performance:
- 1H 2025 net profit surged about 301% to S$144 million.
- Gross margin improved to about 7.4%, from 3.7% in 1H 2024, thanks to a richer mix of higher‑margin projects, efficiency gains and cost optimisation. [14]
Management and local media repeatedly emphasised that the fines would not materially impact 2025 earnings or net tangible assets, largely because Seatrium had already booked substantial provisions in prior years. [15]
Still, the July sell‑off showed that investors are not entirely relaxed about governance risk. That theme will keep resurfacing as we talk about Keppel’s claim and ongoing arbitrations.
3. Q3 2025: a S$16.6 billion order book and long‑dated revenue
On 13 November 2025, Seatrium released a 3Q 2025 business update that underpins most bullish narratives around the stock: [16]
- Net order book:S$16.6 billion,
- Number of projects: 24,
- Delivery horizon: stretching out to 2031,
- Order book / trailing 12‑month revenue: above 1.5×, according to the company’s analyst briefing. [17]
Singapore media summarised the update as Seatrium “eyeing more new order wins” and making “steady progress” toward its 2028 financial targets, with management pointing to a robust pipeline in FPSOs, FPUs, gas infrastructure and repairs. [18]
TipRanks’ recap of the Q3 update highlighted: [19]
- a strong, diversified backlog,
- ongoing margin enhancement via mix and efficiency, and
- continued asset‑light repositioning through divestments.
In other words, even before the latest BP contract and arbitration headlines, 2025 was shaping up as a year where Seatrium looked operationally healthier but still legally messy.
4. Asset sales: slimming down to become more capital‑light
Sale of AmFELS – Seatrium’s only U.S. shipyard
In September 2025, Seatrium announced the sale of its AmFELS Yard at the Port of Brownsville, Texas – its only U.S. shipyard – to Karpower Valley LLC, an affiliate of Turkey’s Karpowership. [20]
Key details from Seatrium’s announcement and multiple industry outlets: [21]
- Sale price: about S$65 million (≈US$50–51 million).
- Book value: around S$39 million as of 30 June 2025.
- Part of a broader strategy to streamline operations, improve capital efficiency and monetise surplus assets.
- Seatrium will complete all ongoing AmFELS projects by end‑2025, including the first U.S.-built WTIV Charybdis and other large vessels.
- After the sale, Seatrium plans to pivot its U.S. presence toward engineering innovation and technology, maintaining R&D and service centres in Houston and Vicksburg, Mississippi.
The sale is capital‑accretive (above book value) and frees up cash, but it also reduces Seatrium’s on‑the‑ground industrial footprint in North America at a time when U.S. offshore wind and energy infrastructure could still become a large market – if policy and economics cooperate.
Divestment of non‑core vessels
In November 2025, Seatrium announced the divestment of two platform supply vessels and related interests for about S$77 million, describing the assets as non‑core. [22]
Together, the AmFELS sale and the vessel divestment show a clear pattern:
- reduce capital tied up in low‑return, non‑core or geographically awkward assets,
- refocus on higher‑margin segments and technology, and
- improve balance‑sheet flexibility after the Brazilian settlements.
5. Latest headline #1 (Dec 2025): Seatrium vs Maersk in a US$475m WTIV arbitration
The biggest near‑term swing factor for Seatrium’s stock is the escalating battle over a wind turbine installation vessel (WTIV) originally destined for the Empire Wind 1 offshore wind farm off New York.
What happened?
- In October 2025, Denmark’s Maersk Offshore Wind (an affiliate of A.P. Moller – Maersk) terminated a US$475 million contract with Seatrium for a nearly completed WTIV. [23]
- The vessel is reported to be around 98.9% complete, with construction delays and technical issues cited as reasons for termination. [24]
- News of the termination triggered a share price drop of about 6.5% on the SGX, adding to concerns about project execution and exposure to the troubled U.S. offshore wind sector. [25]
The WTIV was intended for Equinor’s Empire Wind 1 project, which itself faces regulatory and economic headwinds, making this a perfect storm of contract risk and sector turbulence. [26]
Seatrium’s response: arbitration and a push to enforce the contract
On 29 November 2025, Seatrium disclosed that it had filed a notice of arbitration in London against a Maersk affiliate (Phoenix II A/S): [27]
- Seatrium claims the buyer wrongfully terminated the contract and is seeking:
- a declaration that the contract remains valid and binding,
- an order for the buyer to take delivery of the vessel and pay the delivery instalment, or
- alternatively, damages to be assessed by the tribunal.
- Crucially, Seatrium notes that around 80% of the contract price is payable upon delivery – an older riskier structure compared with its more diversified milestone‑based contracts today. [28]
- The company has already issued a notice stating that the vessel will be delivered on 30 January 2026, regardless of the dispute, and that the financial impact cannot yet be reliably estimated. [29]
Industry and shipping outlets (OffshoreWind.biz, gCaptain, Maritime Executive, WorkBoat and others) have all framed this as a high‑stakes arbitration with binary outcomes for Seatrium’s cash flows. [30]
How the market is treating it (so far)
Business Times flagged Seatrium as a “stock to watch” on 1 December 2025 as it announced the arbitration, noting that the share had closed at S$2.15 before the news. [31]
For now, the stock has not collapsed, suggesting investors see the WTIV dispute as a serious but not yet fatal risk. But the sheer size of the contract and the lopsided cash‑at‑delivery structure mean the arbitration could swing multiyear earnings.
6. Latest headline #2: BP’s Tiber FPU contract lifts 2025 order wins above S$2 billion
Balancing the WTIV drama is a major new contract win.
In late November 2025, Seatrium announced that it had secured the Tiber Floating Production Unit (FPU) contract from BP for a deepwater project in the Gulf of Mexico: [32]
- The Tiber FPU is Seatrium’s second consecutive deepwater FPU project for BP, following the Kaskida FPU awarded in December 2024. [33]
- Analysts at DBS and CGS International estimate the contract at around US$1.3 billion, broadly similar to Kaskida. [34]
- Business Times and The Edge report that this win brings Seatrium’s total 2025 contract wins to more than S$2 billion, reinforcing the narrative of a sustained upcycle in offshore production spending. [35]
Broker commentary following the announcement remained upbeat:
- DBS maintained its “BUY” rating and S$2.96 target price, pointing to the scale of the BP work and strong order flow. [36]
- CGS International also kept an “ADD/BUY” stance. [37]
In other words, where the Maersk WTIV dispute is a project‑specific downside risk, the BP FPU win is a portfolio‑level plus that extends revenue visibility into the next decade.
7. Analyst sentiment, price targets and “fair value” estimates
If you’re asking “What’s the Seatrium stock forecast for 2026?”, the analyst community is, on average, constructively optimistic but not euphoric.
Consensus targets and upside
Different data providers show slightly different aggregates, but they cluster in a narrow band:
- GrowBeansprout (SGX‑linked estimates):
- Fintel (global broker composite):
- Average 1‑year target:S$2.84
- Range: S$2.60 – S$3.11, based on a November 2025 snapshot. [40]
- TradingView analyst forecast page:
- Average price target:S$2.87, with a max of S$3.05 and min of S$2.67. [41]
- Yahoo Finance:
- Shows a 1‑year target estimate around S$2.83, consistent with the ranges above. [42]
- Nasdaq (OTC ticker SMBMF):
- For U.S. investors trading the OTC line, Nasdaq reports an average target of US$2.53, implying ~87% upside versus a recent U.S. price (the difference reflects currency, ADR structure and listing). [43]
In short, most sell‑side numbers sit 25–35% above the current S$2.1–2.2 trading band, with a handful of outliers on the high side above S$3.00.
Morningstar-style fair value estimates
A June 2025 article in The Smart Investor, citing Morningstar analysis, notes: [44]
- an estimated fair value of S$2.92 per share,
- an expected operating margin expansion to around 10.3% by 2028, and
- a 41.7% upside versus the then‑current price of S$2.06 (as at 13 June 2025).
Those fair‑value numbers sit in the same ballpark as the broker targets.
Mixed but generally positive ratings
Most Singapore brokers continue to rate Seatrium as “Buy” or “Add”, even after the WTIV dispute and the Brazilian settlements, citing: [45]
- a large, long‑dated order book,
- improving margins and return on equity, and
- a cleaner balance sheet following asset sales and the resolution of legacy probes.
TipRanks, which aggregates different sources, shows a more cautious recent rating at “Hold” with a S$2.50 price target, reminding investors that not everyone is all‑in on the story. [46]
8. Technical and quant views: low volatility, modest bullish bias
Algorithmic and technical‑analysis platforms generally treat Seatrium as a low‑beta, modest‑momentum stock:
- Beta around 0.29 implies the stock moves less than the broader market – at least historically. [47]
- StockInvest’s model notes relatively tight daily trading ranges and low average volatility, categorising the risk as “low” and flagging a recent buy signal from a pivot bottom with an indicative stop‑loss near S$2.02. [48]
Technical tools can’t see legal risk or regulatory investigations, but they do suggest that from a pure price‑action perspective, Seatrium is not behaving like a hyper‑speculative small cap.
9. Structural growth drivers: why bulls like Seatrium
Putting the noise aside, the bull case on Seatrium rests on three structural pillars.
9.1. Upcycle in offshore oil & gas and FPSO/FPU demand
Seatrium is deeply exposed to offshore production infrastructure: FPSOs, FPUs, platforms and complex vessels. [49]
- Higher and more stable oil prices since 2022 have revived offshore project economics, and global upstream capex in deepwater and ultra‑deepwater fields has picked up.
- Seatrium already has multi‑billion‑dollar FPSO work for Petrobras (P‑84 and P‑85) and now two major BP FPUs (Kaskida and Tiber) in its backlog. [50]
Analysts like DBS and Smart Investor argue that Seatrium is one of the cleaner listed proxies for this offshore cycle in Singapore, with a yard network and track record that is hard to replicate quickly. [51]
9.2. Margin expansion and operating leverage
From 2023 to 2025, Seatrium’s financials show: [52]
- Revenue growth in the mid‑20% range (TTM),
- Net earnings growth well into triple digits,
- Rising gross margins (7.4% in 1H 2025 vs 3.7% a year earlier), and
- Improving net debt‑to‑equity (around 0.18–0.20x) and net gearing (Smart Investor quoted 0.11x at end‑2024). [53]
Because of the large fixed‑cost base of shipyards and engineering talent, small changes in margin can create outsized swings in net profit – the classic operating leverage story.
If management can actually push operating margins towards the 10% level by 2028, as Morningstar’s modelling suggests, current valuations could look modest in hindsight. [54]
9.3. Cleaner balance sheet and capital discipline
Between:
- selling the AmFELS yard in Texas,
- divesting non‑core platform supply vessels, and
- normalising capex after the big yard upgrades of the last decade, [55]
Seatrium is gradually becoming a less capital‑intensive business with more room to manoeuvre on shareholder returns (dividends and, eventually, buybacks) – assuming the big arbitrations don’t eat that headroom.
10. Key risks: legal battles, offshore wind pain and cyclicality
This is not a low‑drama stock. The main risk buckets are pretty obvious.
10.1. WTIV arbitration outcome
The US$475 million WTIV dispute with Maersk is, in valuation terms, enormous: [56]
- Under the old contract structure, 80% of the contract value is paid on delivery, making the vessel effectively a big working‑capital warehouse on Seatrium’s balance sheet. [57]
- If Seatrium wins arbitration or reaches a settlement close to the contract value, a large cash inflow would drop into its 2026–2027 numbers.
- If Seatrium loses and must sell or repurpose the vessel at a discount (or absorb heavy damages), it could face a material write‑down and earnings hit.
Given the size and complexity of the case, investors should assume this will be a multi‑year legal process with uncertain timing.
10.2. Operation Car Wash legacy and Keppel’s S$68.4m claim
Even after the July settlements, there is still legal shrapnel flying:
- In August 2025, Keppel filed an arbitration claim for S$68.4 million (≈US$53m) against Seatrium over how Brazil‑related liabilities should be split, tied to their 2023 merger arrangements. [58]
- Seatrium had already set aside about S$82.4 million in provisions in 2023 for such claims and argues that its contractual obligations expired in February 2025. [59]
Regulators in both Brazil and Singapore have signalled that Seatrium must maintain and enhance its compliance framework. Any further revelations or failures in that area could trigger new penalties or reputational damage. [60]
10.3. Offshore wind sector turmoil
The WTIV dispute is partially collateral damage from the broader U.S. offshore wind shake‑out:
- Empire Wind and other U.S. offshore wind projects have faced cost inflation, regulatory delays and contract cancellations, prompting developers and suppliers to re‑think capital commitments. [61]
If offshore wind economics remain fragile, Seatrium may:
- struggle to win new WTIV or large offshore wind fabrication contracts at attractive margins, and
- face greater project‑specific risk when it does.
10.4. Cyclicality, project execution and FX
Even with a big order book, Seatrium is exposed to:
- the cyclical nature of oil & gas and offshore spending,
- project execution risk (delays, cost overruns, technical failures), and
- currency fluctuations, since many contracts are denominated in USD or other currencies while costs are partly in SGD and other local currencies. [62]
The WTIV episode is a sharp reminder that one big project going wrong can chew up years of margin progress.
11. What could move Seatrium’s share price next?
For investors thinking about Seatrium’s stock into 2026, the main catalysts are relatively clear:
- Updates on the Maersk arbitration
- Any sign of an early settlement, interim ruling, or major write‑down will be closely watched. [63]
- New contract wins – especially large FPSO/FPU or LNG projects
- Additional deepwater or gas‑infrastructure orders could push the net order book above S$18 billion and support further margin expansion. [64]
- Resolution (or escalation) of Keppel’s S$68.4m claim
- A clean resolution below the provisions already booked would be read positively; a higher‑than‑expected payout would be a drag. [65]
- FY 2025 results and updated guidance
- Markets will scrutinise whether 1H and Q3 margin improvements are sustainable and how management updates its 2028 financial targets. [66]
- Macro variables
- Oil prices, global offshore capex, and the health of the offshore wind pipeline will all feed into sentiment for Seatrium as an engineering and shipyard play. [67]
12. Bottom line: high‑quality backlog, improving margins… and real legal risk
Putting it all together:
- Fundamentally, Seatrium now has:
- a S$16.6bn order book extending to 2031,
- improving profitability and returns,
- a lighter balance sheet after asset sales, and
- a cleaned‑up (but closely monitored) compliance profile post‑Brazil settlements. [68]
- Valuation wise, trading around S$2.1–2.2 implies:
- ~27x trailing and ~18x forward earnings,
- ~1.1x book value, and
- 0.6–0.7x sales, with a modest ~0.7% yield. [69]
- Consensus price targets in the S$2.7–2.9 range suggest 25–35% potential upside, assuming margins continue to improve and no catastrophic legal outcomes. [70]
- Risk wise, investors must be comfortable with:
- a large, binary WTIV arbitration,
- ongoing Car Wash legacy issues (including Keppel’s claim), and
- standard cycle and project risks in a lumpy, capital‑intensive industry. [71]
For investors scanning Google News or Discover in search of a Seatrium stock forecast, the most realistic summary is:
Seatrium in December 2025 is a leveraged bet on the global offshore energy cycle with a strong backlog and improving margins, offset by heavy project‑specific and legal risk.
References
1. growbeansprout.com, 2. www.reuters.com, 3. growbeansprout.com, 4. stockanalysis.com, 5. investors.seatrium.com, 6. stockanalysis.com, 7. simplywall.st, 8. simplywall.st, 9. www.agc.gov.sg, 10. investors.seatrium.com, 11. www.businesstimes.com.sg, 12. www.businesstimes.com.sg, 13. www.agc.gov.sg, 14. www.straitstimes.com, 15. www.straitstimes.com, 16. www.straitstimes.com, 17. investors.seatrium.com, 18. www.businesstimes.com.sg, 19. www.tipranks.com, 20. www.reuters.com, 21. www.reuters.com, 22. www.marketscreener.com, 23. www.reuters.com, 24. www.reuters.com, 25. www.reuters.com, 26. www.reuters.com, 27. www.straitstimes.com, 28. www.straitstimes.com, 29. www.straitstimes.com, 30. www.offshorewind.biz, 31. www.businesstimes.com.sg, 32. sg.finance.yahoo.com, 33. www.businesstimes.com.sg, 34. www.theedgesingapore.com, 35. www.businesstimes.com.sg, 36. www.theedgesingapore.com, 37. www.theedgesingapore.com, 38. growbeansprout.com, 39. growbeansprout.com, 40. fintel.io, 41. www.tradingview.com, 42. finance.yahoo.com, 43. www.nasdaq.com, 44. thesmartinvestor.com.sg, 45. growbeansprout.com, 46. www.tipranks.com, 47. stockanalysis.com, 48. stockinvest.us, 49. stockanalysis.com, 50. thesmartinvestor.com.sg, 51. www.theedgesingapore.com, 52. sg.finance.yahoo.com, 53. classic.shareinvestor.com, 54. thesmartinvestor.com.sg, 55. worldoil.com, 56. www.reuters.com, 57. www.straitstimes.com, 58. www.reuters.com, 59. www.reuters.com, 60. www.agc.gov.sg, 61. www.reuters.com, 62. stockanalysis.com, 63. www.straitstimes.com, 64. www.straitstimes.com, 65. www.reuters.com, 66. www.straitstimes.com, 67. thesmartinvestor.com.sg, 68. www.straitstimes.com, 69. stockanalysis.com, 70. growbeansprout.com, 71. www.straitstimes.com
