Constellation Energy (CEG) Stock Today: Calpine Deal Nears Close as Nuclear Data‑Center Contracts Shape 2026 Outlook (Dec. 15, 2025)

Constellation Energy (CEG) Stock Today: Calpine Deal Nears Close as Nuclear Data‑Center Contracts Shape 2026 Outlook (Dec. 15, 2025)

Constellation Energy Corporation (NASDAQ: CEG) is back in focus on December 15, 2025 as investors digest a busy stretch of deal news, federal support for nuclear restarts, and continued momentum behind “24/7 carbon‑free” power contracts tied to the AI data‑center buildout.

Shares traded around $356.99 in Monday’s session (as of 18:25 UTC), with an intraday range of roughly $350.87 to $360.96, according to market data.

That price action comes after heightened volatility in early December and as Wall Street weighs a simple question that increasingly defines nuclear‑heavy “merchant” generators: can Constellation turn surging demand for always‑on clean power into long-duration, high-value contracts—without overpaying for growth or taking on too much integration risk?


Constellation Energy news recap for Dec. 15, 2025

Below are the most current developments investors are citing today, along with why they matter for CEG stock.

1) “AI energy stock” spotlight: CEG highlighted in a Dec. 15 Zacks/Nasdaq feature

A Zacks Investment Ideas piece published on December 15 frames Constellation as a core beneficiary of AI-driven electricity demand, pointing to its long-term power agreements with major tech companies and the pending Calpine acquisition as a scale accelerator. The article also cites expectations for adjusted EPS growth into 2026 and notes Constellation’s strong stock performance since 2022. [1]

Why it matters: Whether you agree with the bullish framing or not, the “AI power” narrative continues to pull incremental investor attention—and can influence multiples, sentiment, and near‑term flows.

2) Policy tailwind in the headlines: DOE push to pair data centers and nuclear on federal land

A Roll Call report published December 15 says the U.S. Energy Department wants to facilitate nuclear‑powered AI data centers on federal land through new public‑private partnerships, with discussion of construction timelines and site activity at multiple DOE locations. [2]

Why it matters: It reinforces a broader federal posture that treats nuclear (including advanced reactors) as strategic infrastructure for AI-era load growth. That doesn’t automatically translate into near-term earnings, but it can shape permitting, project pipelines, and customer confidence in nuclear-backed power procurement.

3) “Deal of the Year” award tied to Microsoft PPA and nuclear restart branding

Constellation announced it won “Energy Deal of the Year” at the 2025 Platts Global Energy Awards for its 20‑year power purchase agreement with Microsoft, which it says paved the way for the Crane Clean Energy Center launch and the restart of Unit 1 in Londonderry, Pennsylvania (formerly associated with the Three Mile Island site). [3]

Why it matters: Awards don’t change cash flow by themselves, but this one highlights a key strategic pillar: long-duration nuclear power contracting for data centers, plus a restart that—if executed on time and on budget—could add sizable zero‑carbon baseload supply.

4) Calpine transaction enters endgame: DOJ settlement, divestitures, and court process

Earlier this month, Constellation said it reached a resolution with the U.S. Department of Justice that it called the final regulatory clearance required for its Calpine acquisition, subject to court steps. [4]
Reuters reported that the agreement involves divestitures to address competition concerns, and noted the deal was announced in January amid rising load expectations driven by data centers and electrification. [5]
The U.S. Department of Justice press release describes a proposed settlement requiring divestiture of six power plants across PJM and ERCOT footprints, plus a Tunney Act process that includes publication in the Federal Register and a 60‑day public comment period before final court judgment. [6]

Why it matters: The acquisition is a transformative bet on scale and diversification (nuclear + gas + geothermal + commercial platform). But it also increases execution risk—and brings mandated asset sales that investors will model for proceeds, timing, and the ultimate shape of the combined fleet.

5) Financing mechanics ahead of closing: exchange offers tied to Calpine notes

Constellation disclosed private exchange offers and consent solicitations for Calpine notes, including an indicative timetable with a December 22, 2025 early tender/withdrawal deadline and a January 8, 2026 expiration date, with settlement expected shortly after expiration (subject to conditions, including completion of the Calpine merger). [7]

Why it matters: These steps are “plumbing,” but important plumbing—signaling the company is actively preparing the capital structure around the transaction rather than treating closing as a distant possibility.


Why Constellation Energy (CEG) stock has become a “data economy” proxy

Constellation isn’t a typical regulated utility. Its core identity is increasingly tied to a simple product that hyperscalers want and grids need:

large blocks of reliable, always-on, emissions-free power—delivered under long-term contracts that can support both corporate decarbonization goals and operational uptime.

That positioning comes through in Constellation’s own description of its business: it says it is the nation’s largest producer of emissions-free energy, with output that is nearly 90% carbon-free, and with a generating portfolio capable of powering the equivalent of 16 million homes. [8]

In 2025, that “data economy” angle has crystallized in three major threads investors keep returning to:

  1. Big-tech nuclear PPAs (Microsoft and Meta are the headline names). [9]
  2. Federal support that makes nuclear restarts and development feel more financeable. [10]
  3. M&A scale via Calpine, extending Constellation’s reach in high-growth power markets and adding flexible generation that often sets market prices. [11]

Calpine acquisition update: what’s approved, what’s required, and what investors will watch next

What the deal is (and why the dollar figure varies by source)

The Calpine transaction has been described with different headline numbers depending on whether a source is referencing the equity purchase price versus the broader value including assumed debt and other components.

  • DOJ describes it as a $26.6 billion acquisition. [12]
  • Utility Dive similarly references a $26.6 billion deal and explains the competitive issues raised by regulators. [13]
  • Reuters has referenced $16.4 billion in reporting, a figure often associated with how parts of the consideration are summarized. [14]
  • The December 15 Zacks/Nasdaq feature calls it a roughly $27 billion acquisition. [15]

The key regulatory and legal steps

The most important near‑term mechanics are now less about agency approvals and more about court process and divestiture execution.

  • DOJ says it filed a civil antitrust lawsuit and a proposed settlement that would resolve competitive concerns if approved by the court, requiring divestiture of six power plants. [16]
  • DOJ also outlines the Tunney Act process: publication in the Federal Register and 60 days for public comments before the court can enter final judgment if it finds it in the public interest. [17]
  • Utility Dive reports Constellation can close once the court signs the stipulation and order, and notes a requirement to enter into contracts to sell assets within 240 days after buying Calpine. [18]

Why Calpine matters strategically

From an investment perspective, the Calpine combination is about more than adding megawatts. It’s about changing Constellation’s earnings profile:

  • Expanding into large-load growth regions (especially Texas/ERCOT, where data center demand has been a key narrative). [19]
  • Adding a larger mix of natural gas generation, which can benefit from higher price volatility and often sets clearing prices in power markets—but also adds fuel and emissions exposure. [20]
  • Creating a bigger platform to negotiate bundled products: nuclear-backed clean energy, gas-backed flexibility, retail supply, and increasingly sophisticated matching products for corporate buyers.

Nuclear contracts that are moving the story: Microsoft, Meta, and “24/7 carbon-free” demand

Crane Clean Energy Center / Three Mile Island Unit 1: restart ambitions and federal support

Constellation’s Crane Clean Energy Center narrative is closely tied to its Microsoft relationship.

  • Constellation says its Microsoft 20‑year PPA helped enable the Crane restart and that Microsoft will utilize the plant’s 835 MW of emissions‑free energy to match data centers’ power use and support PJM reliability. [21]
  • Reuters reported in November that the U.S. government loaned Constellation $1 billion to restart its Pennsylvania reactor at a plant formerly known as Three Mile Island. [22]

Investor lens: A restart is a high-stakes execution project. If it proceeds on schedule and within cost expectations, it could add large baseload capacity into a grid increasingly hungry for firm power. If it slips, the market may treat the narrative as “priced in” before cash flow arrives.

Meta’s long-duration nuclear agreement at Clinton, Illinois

In June, Reuters reported Meta signed a 20‑year agreement with Constellation tied to output from Constellation’s Clinton Clean Energy Center, described as roughly 1,121 MW, with the contract set to begin in June 2027 and intended to support continued operation and relicensing.

Investor lens: These long contracts can reduce earnings volatility compared with pure merchant exposure—especially if structured with attractive pricing, escalators, and creditworthy counterparties. They also help justify nuclear investments that might otherwise be hard to underwrite.

Beyond hyperscalers: “hourly matching” becomes a commercial product

Constellation announced a December agreement with W. L. Gore & Associates to incorporate hourly carbon-free energy matching into a clean energy procurement program (approximately 110,000 MWh per year) through November 2026. [23]

Investor lens: This expands the addressable market beyond the biggest tech names. If hourly matching becomes a standard procurement feature (rather than a niche premium), it could deepen customer stickiness and raise the value of Constellation’s always‑on nuclear fleet.


Earnings and guidance: what management has put on the record

Constellation’s most recent quarterly reporting in 2025 included guidance updates that remain central to near-term modeling.

MarketBeat’s earnings page notes the company issued FY2025 EPS guidance of roughly $9.05 to $9.45 in an update tied to its November reporting period, alongside consensus estimates tracked by analysts. [24]

Separately, the December 15 Zacks/Nasdaq feature highlights Constellation’s dividend growth actions (noting increases in 2024 and 2025) and frames the company’s longer-term earnings power in the context of the Nuclear Production Tax Credit. [25]

What investors typically focus on with CEG earnings:

  • Nuclear fleet performance (capacity factor, refueling outages, unplanned downtime).
  • Realized power prices and hedge positions in key markets.
  • Commercial contracting cadence (duration, pricing structure, indexation).
  • Progress on Calpine integration readiness (cost synergies vs. distractions).
  • Regulatory developments affecting nuclear economics and market design.

Analyst forecasts for CEG stock: price targets, EPS expectations, and what they imply

Wall Street consensus (as aggregated today)

Different aggregators show slightly different snapshots, but both point to a generally constructive Street stance.

  • StockAnalysis lists an average analyst rating of “Buy” and a 12‑month price target around $391 (based on its displayed analyst set). [26]
  • MarketBeat’s earnings and estimates page shows a current‑year EPS consensus estimate around $9.31 and next‑year EPS consensus around $10.65, implying expected growth into 2026. [27]

Valuation: why opinions are diverging

High-quality nuclear supply is scarce—and scarcity can command a premium. But that premium can also be a risk.

  • MarketBeat lists Constellation’s trailing P/E around 41 (with a forward P/E also elevated), underscoring how much future execution is already reflected in the stock price. [28]
  • A December 11 analysis from 24/7 Wall St. argues Constellation trades at a significant valuation premium versus certain peers, framing it as a “pure play” on nuclear momentum and data-center demand. (This is commentary, not company guidance.) [29]

How to read this:
When a stock’s multiple is high, the market is effectively saying, “We believe the next leg of growth is more dependable than it looks.” For CEG, that belief rests on (1) durable AI/load growth, (2) long-term contracting, and (3) successful Calpine integration and divestiture execution.


The bull case for Constellation Energy stock going into 2026

Investors who remain bullish on CEG typically point to a reinforcing set of tailwinds:

  • Demand shock for firm power: AI data centers, electrification, and onshoring are creating a multi‑year need for capacity and reliability, a theme that underpins the Calpine rationale and the nuclear contracting boom. [30]
  • Contracting power: Long-term PPAs with major counterparties (Microsoft, Meta) provide credibility and can reduce future merchant exposure. [31]
  • Policy and financing support: Federal actions and programs that support nuclear restarts and advanced reactors can reduce funding friction and improve timelines. [32]
  • Scale after Calpine: Once closed, Constellation would become a larger wholesale provider with a broader technology mix—potentially improving customer offerings and hedging flexibility. [33]

The bear case: what could go wrong (and why the market cares)

Even believers in the long-term nuclear thesis often acknowledge that CEG carries real risks:

  • Merger integration and divestiture complexity: DOJ’s settlement requires divestitures and a court process; timelines, asset valuations, and buyer quality matter. [34]
  • Execution risk on nuclear restarts: Restarts are engineering-and-regulatory heavy lifts. Any slippage can impact sentiment well before it impacts earnings. [35]
  • Valuation sensitivity: If power-price expectations soften, if data-center procurement slows, or if long-term contract pricing is less attractive than hoped, the multiple can compress quickly. [36]
  • Market design and political risk: Power markets (PJM, ERCOT) and federal/state policy can change the economics of generation, contracting, and interconnection. The current direction appears supportive of nuclear in several channels, but policy is rarely linear. [37]

What to watch next: key dates and catalysts for CEG stock

Here are the practical calendar items that could create headlines and move the stock after December 15:

  • Tunney Act timeline for Calpine settlement: DOJ says the settlement and competitive impact statement will be published in the Federal Register and will have a 60‑day comment window before final judgment. [38]
  • Calpine-related exchange offer deadlines: Constellation’s timetable includes an early tender/withdrawal deadline on Dec. 22, 2025 and an expiration date on Jan. 8, 2026, subject to conditions (including merger completion). [39]
  • Next earnings window: MarketBeat lists an estimated next earnings date of Feb. 17, 2026 (not confirmed by the company, per MarketBeat’s note). [40]
  • Contracting and nuclear project milestones: Updates tied to the Crane restart and large-load contracting will likely remain recurring catalysts, especially as DOE and industry activity around co-location accelerates. [41]

Bottom line: Constellation Energy stock remains a high-conviction bet on “always-on clean power”

As of December 15, 2025, Constellation Energy sits at the intersection of three of the most powerful themes in U.S. infrastructure markets:

  1. AI-driven electricity demand growth
  2. A renewed push for nuclear and firm capacity
  3. Deal-driven consolidation to build scale and diversify supply

The upside case is straightforward: if Constellation closes Calpine cleanly, executes required divestitures efficiently, and continues signing long-duration, premium-priced nuclear-backed contracts, then today’s valuation can be defended—and possibly expanded.

The risk case is equally clear: large transactions and complex nuclear projects leave little room for missteps, and the stock’s premium means the market is already expecting a lot of things to go right.

References

1. www.nasdaq.com, 2. rollcall.com, 3. www.constellationenergy.com, 4. www.constellationenergy.com, 5. www.reuters.com, 6. www.justice.gov, 7. www.constellationenergy.com, 8. www.constellationenergy.com, 9. www.constellationenergy.com, 10. www.reuters.com, 11. www.justice.gov, 12. www.justice.gov, 13. www.utilitydive.com, 14. www.reuters.com, 15. www.nasdaq.com, 16. www.justice.gov, 17. www.justice.gov, 18. www.utilitydive.com, 19. www.utilitydive.com, 20. www.justice.gov, 21. www.constellationenergy.com, 22. www.reuters.com, 23. www.constellationenergy.com, 24. www.marketbeat.com, 25. www.nasdaq.com, 26. stockanalysis.com, 27. www.marketbeat.com, 28. www.marketbeat.com, 29. 247wallst.com, 30. www.reuters.com, 31. www.constellationenergy.com, 32. www.reuters.com, 33. www.utilitydive.com, 34. www.justice.gov, 35. www.reuters.com, 36. www.marketbeat.com, 37. www.justice.gov, 38. www.justice.gov, 39. www.constellationenergy.com, 40. www.marketbeat.com, 41. www.constellationenergy.com

Stock Market Today

  • Jim Cramer backs Procter & Gamble stock, touts AI-driven efficiency
    December 15, 2025, 8:17 PM EST. CNBC's Jim Cramer made the case for Procter & Gamble after reviewing market action, arguing the consumer giant uses AI to improve its supply chain and factory design. He contrasted it with tech hyperscalers that spend heavily on AI, preferring business-to-business technology users that can cut costs and bring new products to market faster. Cramer highlighted P&G's stable brands-Pampers, Crest, Olay, Gillette, Dawn, Febreze and Mr. Clean-and noted the stock's 13%+ decline year-to-date, a 20x earnings multiple and a 2.91% dividend yield. He called P&G a buy in this 'whacky market,' saying you want companies that use the technology, not those that merely make it. He warned that the Magnificent Seven face murkier futures due to rising competition and spending.
Pfizer Stock (PFE) News, Forecasts, and Analyst Outlook: What’s Driving Shares on December 15, 2025
Previous Story

Pfizer Stock (PFE) News, Forecasts, and Analyst Outlook: What’s Driving Shares on December 15, 2025

Nebius Group N.V. Stock (NBIS) Today: Why Shares Are Falling on Dec. 15, 2025—and What Analysts Forecast After Microsoft and Meta AI Deals
Next Story

Nebius Group N.V. Stock (NBIS) Today: Why Shares Are Falling on Dec. 15, 2025—and What Analysts Forecast After Microsoft and Meta AI Deals

Go toTop