- Release Timeline: Samsung’s Galaxy S26 Ultra is rumored to launch in January 2026 at the annual Galaxy Unpacked event [1]. In contrast, Xiaomi’s 17 Pro Max was unveiled in China in late September 2025, with a likely global rollout in early 2026 [2] [3]. Samsung’s device remains unannounced, while Xiaomi’s is already on the market (in China).
- Chipsets: The S26 Ultra is expected to run on Qualcomm’s next-gen Snapdragon 8 series chip (with Samsung’s own Exynos used in some regions) [4]. Xiaomi’s 17 Pro Max debuted with the brand-new Snapdragon 8 “Elite” Gen 5 – Qualcomm’s latest flagship processor as of late 2025 – paired with up to 16 GB RAM and 1 TB storage [5]. In raw processing power, Xiaomi holds an edge by launching with the newest chip generation.
- Battery & Charging: Samsung reportedly sticks with a ~5,000 mAh battery in the S26 Ultra but finally upgrades to 60 W fast charging (a notable jump from the S25’s 45 W) [6]. Xiaomi, meanwhile, went all-in on endurance: the 17 Pro Max carries a massive 7,500 mAh battery using an L-shaped cell design and supports 100 W wired / 50 W wireless charging [7] [8]. In practice, Xiaomi claims over two days of use on a single charge, far outlasting typical flagships.
- Displays: Both phones feature giant, high-end OLED screens around 6.9 inches. Samsung’s S26 Ultra is expected to have a ~6.89″ AMOLED with cutting-edge M14 panel tech, ultra-high brightness, and even an AI-powered privacy filter [9]. Xiaomi’s 17 Pro Max has a 6.9″ OLED (using new “M10” material) and one-ups Samsung with a unique 2.7″ secondary display on the back of the phone [10]. This rear mini-screen (904×572, 120 Hz) acts as a glanceable panel for notifications, music, and as a selfie viewfinder using the main cameras [11].
- Cameras: The Galaxy S26 Ultra is rumored to retain a 200 MP main camera sensor, refining it with a wider aperture (around f/1.4) and improved optics [12]. It should also carry multiple telephoto lenses (including a 5× periscope zoom, now brighter at f/2.9) for better low-light zoom shots [13]. Xiaomi’s 17 Pro Max uses a Leica-tuned triple camera setup, with a 50 MP main (f/1.67), 50 MP ultra-wide (f/2.4), and a 50 MP periscope telephoto offering 5× optical zoom (f/2.6) plus even a 30 cm macro capability [14]. In short, Samsung leans on a super-high-resolution sensor and improved lenses, while Xiaomi emphasizes large sensors and Leica’s color science.
- Other Features:S Pen stylus support remains a signature perk of the S26 Ultra (likely with a redesigned, slimmer stylus) [15]. Samsung is also reportedly baking in a host of AI-powered software features (One UI 8.5 with on-device AI for translation, text generation, etc.) to set its user experience apart [16]. Xiaomi’s 17 Pro Max doesn’t support a stylus, but it introduces Xiaomi’s new HyperOS 3 (Android 16) with heavy AI integration via the XiaoAI assistant [17]. The Xiaomi also boasts next-gen connectivity (Wi‑Fi 7, ultra-wideband) and quirky extras like an optional GameBoy-style case for the rear screen (turning the phone into a mini retro-gaming console).
- Pricing & Market: Samsung is targeting the ultra-premium segment – the S26 Ultra is expected to start around $1,300+ (USD) in most markets [18]. Xiaomi, by contrast, priced the 17 Pro Max at ¥5,999 in China (≈$840) – significantly undercutting equivalent Apple/Samsung flagships [19]. This aggressive pricing is part of Xiaomi’s strategy to lure high-end customers. Notably, Xiaomi skipped naming a “16” series and jumped to “17” to align with Apple’s iPhone 17 naming [20]. Company executives openly admit the 17-series is aimed squarely at challenging Apple’s iPhone 17 in specs and value. Samsung, meanwhile, is focusing on outdoing rivals through technology (especially AI and displays) rather than pricing, and it will leverage its far broader global sales network when the S26 launches [21].
With those key facts in mind, let’s dive deeper into how each of these 2026 flagship titans is shaping up – and how they compare to each other and the competition.
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra: Refined Powerhouse (Rumors & Expectations)
Samsung is expected to unveil the Galaxy S26 series in early 2026, likely at a January Unpacked event [22]. The lineup will reportedly include a base S26, a new S26 Edge (replacing the traditional “Plus” model with a slimmer design), an S26 Pro, and the top-tier S26 Ultra [23]. This naming shake-up – dropping “Plus” for “Edge” – signals a small reboot of the series, but the Ultra model remains the crown jewel. Industry leaks suggest Samsung will stick with a familiar formula for the Ultra’s hardware design. The display size isn’t growing larger; it’s pegged around 6.89″, essentially the same as the S25 Ultra’s 6.9″ screen [24]. Instead, Samsung’s focus is on refining quality: expect an AMOLED panel with the latest M14 material, slimmer bezels, new anti-reflective glass, and possibly even an AI-driven “privacy screen” mode that narrows viewing angles when needed [25] [26]. (Samsung has reportedly experimented with an “Flex Magic” display tech for privacy, though details are sparse [27].)
Under the hood, the Galaxy S26 Ultra should run Qualcomm’s flagship 8-series chipset, but there is some intrigue about the exact chip. Samsung often uses the newest Snapdragon in most regions and its in-house Exynos in some markets (like Europe). Current rumors point to Samsung equipping the S26 Ultra with a variant of the Snapdragon platform equivalent to a Snapdragon 8 “Elite” Gen2 (the naming is a bit unclear, as Qualcomm’s Gen3/Gen4 chips are in pipeline) [28]. Essentially, it will have one of the top-performing smartphone processors of its time, paired with likely 12–16 GB of RAM and up to 1 TB of storage in premium configurations [29]. Samsung’s own Exynos chip might appear in certain regions, but if so, it’s expected to be a similarly high-end SoC to keep performance consistent. In any case, the S26 Ultra will have more than enough horsepower for 2026’s demanding apps and AI features.
One long-awaited upgrade for Samsung fans is faster charging speed. Multiple leaks (including noted tipster Ice Universe) indicate that Samsung is finally raising the Ultra’s charging rate from 45 W to 60 W wired charging [30] [31]. This roughly 33% jump would make the S26 Ultra charge notably faster than its predecessors – and even outpace Apple’s charging, which is around 30 W–40 W on recent iPhones [32] [33]. Samsung appears to be prioritizing charging efficiency over sheer battery size; reports suggest the S26 Ultra will stick to a battery capacity around 5,000 mAh (likely ~4,855 mAh rated, ~5,100 mAh typical) [34]. That capacity has been standard for Galaxy Ultra phones since 2020. In fact, observers have wryly noted that Samsung “may be repeating its predecessors’ biggest mistake” by not increasing the battery size yet again [35]. However, Samsung is betting that 60 W fast charging and improved power efficiency (from new chipsets and software optimizations) will offset the moderate battery size. If the phone can charge to 50% in under 30 minutes, for example, that might satisfy users even without a two-day battery. Still, this conservative battery approach contrasts sharply with Xiaomi’s strategy, as we’ll see.
On the camera front, the Galaxy S26 Ultra is expected to refine the formidable system of the S25. Samsung will likely retain the 200 MP main sensor introduced in the S23/S24 Ultra era [36], but with tweaks. One rumor claims Samsung will use a wider aperture (around f/1.4) on the main camera, allowing more light for improved low-light shots [37]. The Ultra is also said to carry multiple telephoto lenses again – possibly a 3× and a 5× periscope. Notably, the 5× periscope telephoto lens might get an upgrade to a larger 50 MP sensor and a brighter f/2.9 aperture (an improvement over the S25 Ultra’s f/3.4) [38] [39]. This change would let in ~50% more light to the zoom camera, yielding better clarity and less noise in zoomed shots, especially in low-light scenarios [40]. In practical terms, expect improved night mode portraits and clearer 30× or 50× zoom shots thanks to this lens refinement. Samsung will likely keep the other cameras similar: an ultra-wide lens (around 12 MP) for expansive shots, and perhaps the 3× telephoto around 10 MP for mid-range zoom and portraits. The selfie camera on the S26 Ultra is rumored to be under-display this year (possibly a 4 MP UDC like on Samsung’s foldables) [41], which means the front camera would be hidden beneath the screen for a full-edge display – a neat trick for design, though under-display cameras typically trade off some image quality.
In terms of design and build, leaks point toward subtle refinements rather than a radical redesign. The S26 Ultra will likely maintain the trademark built-in S Pen stylus, enabling all the note-taking and sketching features that set the Galaxy Ultra apart [42]. The phone’s shape might become a bit more rounded: insiders suggest a slightly more curved frame and glass, perhaps to improve ergonomics over the boxier previous model [43]. Samsung may use new materials for a sleeker feel, but the overall footprint (screen size ~6.9″ and big battery) means it will remain a hefty, large device. One report claims Samsung could introduce an “Edge” variant that’s ultra-thin (~5.5 mm) as a separate model [44], but the Ultra itself will prioritize features over thinness. We can also expect IP68 water/dust resistance, stereo speakers, and an ultrasonic in-screen fingerprint reader – standard fare for Samsung’s flagships [45].
Where Samsung really aims to differentiate the S26 Ultra is in software and AI features. The phone will ship with Android 16 (or newer) and Samsung’s One UI 8.5 skin. Samsung has been touting “Galaxy AI” in its marketing leading up to this launch [46]. Leaked One UI 8.5 features suggest a deep integration of AI assistants and smart features throughout the user experience [47]. For example, Samsung is reportedly developing: a “Meeting Translate” feature that can live-transcribe and translate voice calls in real time, a “smart clipboard” that can summarize or translate copied text on the fly, and a “Social Composer” that uses AI to auto-generate captions or even entire social media posts based on your photos [48]. There’s even talk that Samsung might let users choose between different AI engines (Samsung’s own Gauss model, Google’s coming Gemini, or possibly a third-party like OpenAI) for certain tasks [49]. This would be a unique approach, basically turning the phone into a platform for multiple AI services working in tandem. The overall goal is to make the S26 Ultra feel like a smarter, more proactive device. Samsung is doubling down on AI so it won’t be outdone by Google’s Pixel (with its AI call screening and assistant features) or Apple’s on-device intelligence [50]. Privacy is part of this push too: rumors mention an AI-driven privacy display mode (nicknamed “Flex Magic”), which could use face tracking and intelligent dimming to obscure your screen from over-the-shoulder peepers [51]. All said, the S26 Ultra is positioning itself as the productivity and AI powerhouse in the 2026 flagship race.
In summary, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra appears to be evolutionary rather than revolutionary – a polished refinement of the Ultra formula. It should deliver the same big, beautiful display and premium build, while finally addressing charging speeds and honing the camera system further. The inclusion of the S Pen continues to cater to a niche of power users and creatives that competitors largely ignore. Samsung’s gamble is that a combination of moderate hardware upgrades (faster charging, better zoom, newer Snapdragon chip) plus major software enhancements (AI and ecosystem integration) will be enough to maintain its ultra-flagship crown. As one analyst put it, Samsung may be avoiding flashy spec leaps like huge batteries, instead “pushing new tech… while commanding flagship prices” to solidify its premium brand image [52]. All eyes will be on the official launch in January 2026 to see which of these rumors pan out – and whether Samsung has any surprises in store to wow the tech world.
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max: China’s Bold Challenger to Apple (and Samsung)
By contrast, Xiaomi has already launched its flagship. Announced in Beijing on September 27, 2025, the Xiaomi 17 series (17, 17 Pro, and 17 Pro Max) represents Xiaomi’s most aggressive push into the ultra-premium tier. In a highly publicized event, Xiaomi’s CEO Lei Jun unabashedly compared the new 17-series phones to Apple’s latest iPhones throughout the presentation [53]. “It’s time for everyone to get reacquainted with Xiaomi phones,” Lei Jun declared, even boasting that the *Xiaomi 17 series “has surpassed the iPhone 17 series in many areas,” in terms of battery life, performance, photography, and more [54] [55]. This launch made it clear that Xiaomi’s main target wasn’t Samsung – it was Apple’s iPhone 17. In fact, Xiaomi made the unusual decision to skip the number 16 entirely and jump straight to “17” for its flagship naming, explicitly to keep up with Apple’s iPhone 17 numbering [56]. The lineup’s naming (with a base, Pro, and Pro Max model) mirrors Apple’s structure, a move analysts interpret as symbolic – Xiaomi wants consumers to see it as on the same level as Apple [57]. “The Xiaomi 17 Pro series represents the company’s boldest attempt yet to position its flagship directly against Apple,” said Chiew Le Xuan, a research analyst at Canalys [58]. From pricing to presentation, Xiaomi made clear it aims to be viewed not just as a cheaper alternative, but a peer to Apple in the premium segment.
Of course, challenging Apple (and by extension, Samsung) means backing up the talk with top-tier hardware, and the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max doesn’t disappoint on paper. It’s a specs beast built to grab headlines [59]. At its heart is Qualcomm’s latest Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 chipset – the very newest generation flagship SoC that was announced in late 2025 [60]. This 8 Gen5 chip is a powerhouse, bringing significant jumps in GPU and AI performance over the previous Gen4. Paired with up to 16 GB of LPDDR5X RAM and 1 TB of fast UFS storage in the top configuration, it ensures the 17 Pro Max can handle anything from high-end mobile gaming to AI computations with ease [61]. In fact, Xiaomi’s phone was one of the first to market with the Gen5 chip (beating Samsung’s S26, which will likely use a slightly older platform if rumors hold). This gives Xiaomi bragging rights for having the most advanced processor in an Android phone at launch time. Cooling and sustained performance are also addressed with an advanced vapor chamber cooling system, as Xiaomi tends to optimize for heavy use.
The display is another area where Xiaomi pulled no punches – and even innovated beyond rivals. The 17 Pro Max sports a large 6.9″ AMOLED display up front, presumably with a QHD-class resolution and 120 Hz adaptive refresh (peak brightness and color accuracy among the best, thanks to Xiaomi’s new “M10” OLED panel tech) [62]. The screen supports Dolby Vision and HDR10+ and is protected by durable Gorilla Glass Victus (with Xiaomi claiming an even tougher custom glass – at the launch they showed a stunt of a figure skater gliding over the phone’s display to demonstrate its strength [63]). But what really sets the Xiaomi apart is the secondary screen on the back. The 17 Pro Max features a 2.7-inch “Dynamic Back Display” embedded into the camera bump on the rear [64]. This isn’t a gimmicky tiny ticker – it’s a legit second OLED panel (approximately 904×572 resolution, 120 Hz refresh, and astonishing 3,500 nits peak brightness) with touch input [65] [66]. In essence, Xiaomi utilized the empty space of the camera island to give users a mini-display for at-a-glance info and quick interactions.
What can this rear display do? Quite a lot: it can show you the time, notifications, weather, music controls, and incoming call info without you having to turn the phone around [67]. It also works as a viewfinder for selfies, enabling you to use the superior rear cameras to take high-quality selfies or vlog footage, using the back screen to frame yourself [68]. Additionally, Xiaomi has built in some fun customization – you can have an AI-generated virtual pet or custom widgets living on that back display, reacting to your device status (a playful touch to give the phone personality) [69] [70]. There’s even an official retro gaming case accessory that adds physical buttons around the rear screen, literally turning the phone into a Game Boy-style handheld console [71] [72]. These novel features led Wired’s reviewer Simon Hill to call the dual-screen setup “surprisingly polished” in execution [73]. Unlike some past attempts at secondary screens on phones, Xiaomi’s implementation feels purposeful – it provides real utility (for notifications and selfies) and has a coolness factor that plays into gadget enthusiasts’ nostalgia (with the gaming case). It’s a bold design choice that helps the 17 Pro Max stand out from the crowd of slab smartphones.
If there’s one area Xiaomi decided to absolutely dominate, it’s battery and endurance. The Xiaomi 17 Pro Max packs a huge 7,500 mAh battery – by far one of the largest ever put in a mainstream flagship under 7 inches [74]. (For comparison, most top phones like Samsung’s Ultras or iPhones have around 4,500–5,000 mAh, so this is 50% larger capacity.) Xiaomi achieved this using an innovative L-shaped battery design to utilize interior space efficiently [75]. Importantly, Xiaomi didn’t compromise on charging speed either. The 17 Pro Max supports 100 W wired fast charging (using the USB-PD PPS standard) and 50 W wireless charging [76]. This means despite the massive battery, it can fill up quickly: in ideal conditions, a full 0–100% charge might take just around 30 minutes plugged in, which is astonishing for 7,500 mAh. Xiaomi even claims the phone can reach 80% charge in 20 minutes, though real-world tests will verify that. The net result is a phone that can easily go two days per charge under moderate use – a claim backed up by early tests. In fact, Wired found the 17 Pro Max “easily lasts about two days of mixed use” on a single charge [77], a statement almost unheard of for a flagship phone. Xiaomi is so confident in its battery advantage that, during the launch, they staged a side-by-side endurance test against an iPhone 17: after looping a video for hours, the Xiaomi still had juice left when the iPhone died – and then Xiaomi strapped a 5,000 mAh MagSafe battery pack onto the iPhone 17 and still the Xiaomi outlasted it [78] [79]. It was a theatrical demonstration, but the message was clear. As one tech outlet described, “the message couldn’t be clearer: this phone is built to outlast and outshine Apple’s latest” in battery life [80]. For power users, the allure of a two-day phone that charges to full in the time you’d take a shower is hard to overstate.
Photography is another pillar of the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max’s appeal. Xiaomi continued its partnership with legendary camera maker Leica for the 17-series, focusing on a balanced, high-quality triple camera system. Instead of chasing crazy megapixel counts, Xiaomi equipped the 17 Pro Max with three 50 MP rear cameras [81], each tuned for a specific purpose. The main camera is a 50 MP sensor with a wide f/1.67 aperture and large sensor size (around 1/1.4″, which is bigger than many rivals’ sensors) [82] [83]. This main shooter is designed to excel in low-light and capture rich detail, aided by Leica’s color science and “Authentic” vs “Vibrant” color mode options. Alongside it, there’s a 50 MP ultra-wide camera (f/2.4) for expansive landscape or group shots [84]. Both primary and ultra-wide use high-quality lenses and sensors, ensuring consistency in image quality. The telephoto lens on the Pro Max is where it distinguishes itself: it’s a periscope telephoto with 5× optical zoom, using another 50 MP sensor. Uniquely, this telephoto has a fast f/2.6 aperture and can focus at just 30 cm distance, meaning it doubles as a macro camera for close-ups [85]. This is a versatile zoom lens – it can capture far-away subjects with clarity, and also do extreme close-up shots with beautiful natural bokeh. The smaller Xiaomi 17 Pro (non-Max) also has a 5× zoom, but with a slightly smaller sensor and f/3.0 aperture, so the Pro Max gets the edge in low light zoom performance [86]. While Xiaomi didn’t include any exotic elements like variable aperture or liquid lenses in this generation, it poured resources into making sure each of the three cameras is excellent. Early reviews suggest the 17 Pro Max can trade blows with the best camera phones out there, producing detailed, punchy shots in daylight and leveraging that big sensor for cleaner night photos. Xiaomi’s imaging pipeline uses Leica’s tuning and some AI algorithms (e.g., for scene detection and portrait effects), but they notably did not carry over the gimmicky adjustable aperture or secondary 1″ sensor of the previous Xiaomi 13 Ultra – instead, they focused on perfecting the core triple camera setup. The result, as some reviewers call it, is an “overkill specs beast” that delivers on photography, gaming and multitasking alike [87]. In short, Xiaomi wants the 17 Pro Max to be seen as the spec monster that doesn’t compromise on any feature.
On the software side, Xiaomi introduced a new operating system variant called HyperOS 3, which is based on Android 16 [88]. This is essentially Xiaomi’s successor to MIUI, aiming for a cleaner, faster experience with a lot of AI smarts baked in. XiaoAI 2.0 (Xiaomi’s AI assistant) is integrated system-wide. Xiaomi has highlighted that the assistant can learn from user habits to do things like pre-load frequently used apps, or pop up timely information proactively. For example, if you’re traveling, the phone might put your flight QR code or hotel address on the rear display at just the right moment – a kind of predictive assistance [89]. The camera app uses AI for scene optimization and employs Leica’s “Master AI” mode to fine-tune images in the Leica style. Xiaomi also built some cross-device features: HyperOS can seamlessly connect with Xiaomi laptops, TVs, and even allows integration with Macs and iPads for file transfers and notifications [90]. This last point is part of Xiaomi’s strategy to chip away at Apple’s ecosystem advantage by offering compatibility with Apple devices (an unusual but smart move). Security and privacy remain in focus too, with Xiaomi claiming on-device processing for personal data in many cases. And to add some fun, the rear display animations (like the virtual pets or custom patterns) respond to various triggers – for instance, the pet might sleep when your battery is low or dance when music is playing [91]. It’s a whimsical touch that gives the phone character. Overall, Xiaomi’s software ethos with the 17 series is blending powerful AI-driven features with a lifestyle vibe – the phone not only performs tasks, but also entertains and engages the user in new ways. This differs from Samsung’s more work-focused AI approach; Xiaomi’s is a bit more playful and user-experience oriented [92].
Finally, there’s the matter of availability and price. As of late 2025, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max is only officially available in China. It went on sale there starting ¥5,999 (around $840 USD) for the base configuration [93]. That pricing is remarkably aggressive – for context, $840 is what many mid-range phones cost in Western markets, yet Xiaomi is delivering true ultra-flagship specs at that price. Even the lower models in the 17 series are priced to entice: the base Xiaomi 17 starts at ¥4,499 (~$630) and the 17 Pro at ¥4,999 (~$700) [94] [95]. Xiaomi clearly aims to undercut Apple and Samsung on price while offering more hardware. The big question is global availability. Xiaomi has confirmed that the 17 series (or at least some models of it) will launch globally in early 2026 [96]. Most likely, we’ll see the 17 and 17 Pro (and possibly the Pro Max) reach Europe and India by around February or March 2026. Xiaomi often uses the stage of Mobile World Congress (MWC) in late February to debut its flagship internationally, and insiders suggest the 17 Pro/Pro Max could appear there [97]. A report from The Verge likewise notes a European launch is likely by spring 2026, possibly alongside an even more powerful Xiaomi 17 Ultra variant being saved for global markets [98]. That said, Xiaomi’s global presence has its limits. The brand has strong market share in Asia and parts of Europe, but it has essentially no carrier presence in North America – the U.S. market remains off-limits, due to both business strategy and some political/regulatory hurdles [99]. So, while a European tech enthusiast might be able to buy a 17 Pro Max next year, U.S. customers will likely have to import the device (without official support) if they want it at all. Moreover, Xiaomi’s bold specs come with the caveat of limited ecosystem integration outside China. Apple’s iPhone and Samsung’s Galaxy enjoy tight integration with other devices and services that Xiaomi can’t fully match overseas. As one PhoneArena expert observed, Xiaomi’s hardware prowess puts it “on the same stage… as Apple” in terms of specs and even design ambition, but Apple’s ecosystem and global retail presence remain a huge advantage that Xiaomi cannot overcome overnight [100]. Xiaomi is making inroads – for instance, by supporting Macs and pushing software updates to global devices faster – but it still faces an uphill battle convincing premium customers outside of China to switch. In China, however, the equation is different: Xiaomi has a real shot at converting iPhone users, especially those who want more bang for their buck. Early indicators (like strong pre-orders for the 17 series) show that Xiaomi’s strategy of directly one-upping Apple on specs at a lower price is resonating in its home market [101].
Head-to-Head: How Samsung and Xiaomi Stack Up
Both the Galaxy S26 Ultra and Xiaomi 17 Pro Max are cutting-edge flagships, but they reflect very different philosophies in smartphone design:
- Performance & Chipset: Both phones will run the top Qualcomm Snapdragon chips available at their launch. Xiaomi gets a slight head start by using the absolute latest Snapdragon 8 Gen5 chip (since it launched a bit later in 2025) [102]. Samsung’s S26 Ultra, launching in 2026, will certainly have an elite processor as well – likely on par with a late-2025 Snapdragon in performance – plus Samsung’s own optimizations. In day-to-day use, both devices will be exceptionally powerful, but Xiaomi might hold a marginal advantage in graphics or AI benchmark numbers thanks to that newer silicon. Samsung could narrow the gap with software tuning and, if it uses an Exynos in some models, by optimizing One UI for its own chips. Both offer plentiful RAM (expect 12–16 GB) and fast storage, so multitasking and app loading are instantaneous on either [103] [104]. In short, performance is top-tier on both, with Xiaomi claiming bragging rights for having the newer Snapdragon, but real-world differences should be minor.
- Display & Design: You’re getting a huge, high-quality OLED panel on both phones – roughly 6.9″, high resolution (likely QHD or just slightly lower), and 120 Hz adaptive refresh. Samsung’s reputation for displays is unmatched, and the S26 Ultra will likely have the very latest Samsung-made AMOLED with superb color accuracy, brightness (maybe 2000+ nits), and possibly new tricks like the AI privacy mode [105]. Samsung may also hide the front camera under the display for a pristine full-screen look [106]. Xiaomi’s 17 Pro Max uses an excellent 6.9″ panel too (reports of ~2600 nits peak brightness in HDR, slightly lower than Samsung’s rumored ~2800 nits), and it forgoes any under-display camera – instead it has a punch-hole 20 MP selfie camera on the front [107]. The big differentiator is Xiaomi’s secondary rear screen. Samsung’s phone has a more traditional back (perhaps a polished glass or matte finish with a big camera module), whereas Xiaomi’s back is dominated by that extra display integrated with the camera bump [108]. This makes Xiaomi’s design more eye-catching and futuristic. Some might find it polarizing – it’s asymmetrical and the camera “plateau” plus screen is a bold look compared to Samsung’s typically slick but conservative design. In hand feel, Samsung’s Ultra is usually heavier (~230 g, similar weight to Xiaomi’s 231 g) and has the built-in stylus slot, which adds some thickness. Xiaomi’s Pro Max, despite the big battery, is surprisingly thin (under 9 mm) and the company touted it being lighter and thinner than Apple’s iPhone 17 Pro Max [109]. Both phones use premium materials (aluminum frames, Gorilla Glass or equivalent front/back). Samsung offers IP68 water resistance, which Xiaomi likely also has (Xiaomi didn’t heavily advertise IP rating, but their flagships usually have at least IP53 splash resistance; it’s unclear if the 17 Pro Max is fully IP68, which might be one edge for Samsung). Overall, Samsung emphasizes a refined, professional design (with the S Pen and curved edges), while Xiaomi emphasizes an innovative, attention-grabbing design (with the second screen and a flashy camera bump).
- Battery & Charging: Here the differences are stark. Samsung: ~5,000 mAh battery, finally with 60 W fast charging (and likely ~15 W wireless, ~4.5 W reverse wireless) [110]. Xiaomi: 7,500 mAh battery, 100 W wired, 50 W wireless charging [111]. Xiaomi clearly wins in pure endurance and charging speed. The 17 Pro Max is built to be a battery champion, easily lasting 1.5-2 days per charge for most users [112]. The S26 Ultra will likely be a solid 1-day phone (as its predecessors have been) – enough to get through a day with some cushion, but not two days. However, Samsung’s move to 60 W means you can top up the Ultra much faster than before (perhaps ~70% in half an hour). Still, Xiaomi’s 100 W charging can do 100% in about the same time or less, so Xiaomi remains ahead in the charging race too. One thing to consider is battery longevity: Samsung’s more conservative charging might generate less heat, potentially preserving battery health better over years; Xiaomi pushes the envelope, but they often include software to optimize charging and reduce wear (like smart charging curves). Another aspect is power efficiency – Samsung’s software might optimize background processes, and its slightly smaller screen/battery could mean less drain in idle. But overall, if all-day battery life or fast top-ups are your priority, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max clearly has the advantage on paper. Samsung’s bet is that 5,000 mAh is “good enough” especially with the new Snapdragon efficiency, and that most users will accept nightly charging if it’s faster now.
- Camera Systems: Both phones have very capable camera arrays, but with different philosophies. The Galaxy S26 Ultra will likely offer more versatility in terms of focal lengths – potentially four rear cameras (ultrawide, 3× tele, 5× tele, plus the 200 MP main) and Samsung’s image processing which tends to produce crowd-pleasing vibrant shots. The Xiaomi 17 Pro Max, with its triple 50 MP setup, aims for a balance of quality and consistency across three focal lengths (0.6× ultrawide, 1× main, 5× zoom). Samsung’s 200 MP sensor will allow crazy-detailed 50 MP or 12 MP binned photos and maybe better digital zoom at intermediate ranges. Xiaomi’s larger pixel sensors (50 MP, but large size) focus on low-light performance and detail without going into ultra-high megapixels. In terms of zoom, Samsung might still take the crown for extreme zoom (if it offers a 10× or 20× hybrid zoom, for instance, using that 200 MP crop) – Samsung’s Space Zoom can reach 100× digitally, though usable quality tops out much lower. Xiaomi’s 5× optical can likely deliver very good up to 10× or 15× with digital crop (thanks to 50 MP resolution), but beyond that, Samsung might have an edge. For video, Samsung has historically led in stabilization and overall quality (8K video, excellent HDR processing). Xiaomi’s new phone can certainly do 8K too and has 10-bit LOG modes (given their partnership with Leica for pro modes), but we’ll need to see if it matches Samsung’s polish. Selfie-wise, Samsung’s under-display camera (if used) might produce softer images compared to Xiaomi’s straightforward 20 MP front camera. However, Xiaomi gives you the option to use the rear cameras for selfies with the back screen – which means you can take a selfie with the 50 MP main or ultrawide, yielding far superior shots than any tiny front camera. That’s a unique advantage of Xiaomi’s design for content creators or anyone who wants the absolute best selfie quality. Leica’s influence on Xiaomi’s camera means you get some stylistic choices (they often provide two color tuning options: one authentic, one vibrant) and some nice lens flare effects, etc. Samsung’s camera will lean on its Advanced AI (scene optimizer, perhaps an improved Astro mode, etc.) and refined algorithms that have been honed over years. Both will take excellent photos; enthusiasts might prefer Xiaomi’s approach (which is hardware-heavy and let’s you do a bit more manually), while casual shooters might love Samsung’s reliable point-and-shoot results and stronger video/stabilization. It’s a close fight, but one could say Samsung’s strength is its multi-focal-length system and mature image processing, whereas Xiaomi’s strength is its superior optics (Leica lenses, big sensors) and creative use cases (rear display selfies, etc.).
- Special Features & Ecosystem: Samsung’s hallmark feature is the S Pen stylus on the S26 Ultra [113]. No other mainstream phone in 2026 (bar perhaps some foldables) offers a built-in stylus with such capabilities. For users who sketch, take handwritten notes, or like precise annotation, Samsung stands alone here. Xiaomi has no equivalent to the S Pen – their focus is on the secondary screen as the interactive extra feature. So it’s stylus vs second screen. Depending on your usage, one of these could be a game-changer or irrelevant. Beyond that, Samsung’s strength is its ecosystem integration: it works seamlessly with Galaxy Watch, Buds, laptops (with Windows Link), SmartThings, etc. Xiaomi is trying to build its ecosystem (they make wearables, TVs, smart home devices too), but outside of China, Samsung’s ecosystem (and of course Apple’s) is far more established. On software, Samsung’s One UI is feature-rich and globally proven, with likely 4+ years of updates promised. Xiaomi’s HyperOS/MIUI is improving, but historically MIUI has had some quirks and its update track record internationally is mixed (though they did promise long updates for recent flagships). One unique Samsung edge: Samsung Knox security and all the enterprise integration (if that matters to business users). Xiaomi’s edge: price – it offers a lot of phone for the money. Also, Xiaomi is more willing to experiment with fun features (like the AI pets, or the gaming case) which give it a bit of a “gadget enthusiast” appeal, whereas Samsung plays it a bit safer and more “professional”.
In summary, Samsung’s Galaxy S26 Ultra is like the wise incumbent – it offers a well-rounded, refined experience with few weaknesses, focusing on polish, software smarts, and global reliability (but at a high price). Xiaomi’s 17 Pro Max is the brash challenger – it outguns on raw specs (battery, charging, perhaps RAM, latest chip) and introduces bold innovations (the rear screen) at a significantly lower price, but with the caveat of limited availability and a less established ecosystem. Your choice might boil down to what you value more: the “safe bet” flagship with a stylus and polished software (Samsung), or the “maxed-out” flagship with extreme battery and cutting-edge features (Xiaomi).
Strengths at a Glance
- Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra: Leveraging Samsung’s broad ecosystem and trusted build quality. Comes with the S Pen for productivity, likely the best display quality in the industry, and a host of AI-driven features baked into One UI. Expected to have more refined software, better water resistance, and widespread global support/service. Samsung finally improved charging speed (60 W) to shorten downtime [114], though its battery size remains moderate. Overall, it’s a powerhouse designed to do everything well, if not always the most extreme in each spec, backed by Samsung’s brand reliability.
- Xiaomi 17 Pro Max: A spec-sheet champion that offers more for less money. Its strengths are raw hardware – an enormous 7,500 mAh battery with ultra-fast 100 W charging, the unique rear display that adds functional flair, and a top-tier Snapdragon 8 Gen5 chip with heaps of RAM/storage [115] [116]. It undercuts rivals on price by a large margin, making it extremely attractive to value seekers. Xiaomi focuses on delivering tangible perks (2-day battery, secondary screen utilities, Leica cameras) and isn’t afraid to one-up Apple and Samsung in specs. The trade-offs are that it’s harder to get outside China, the design is bold (which some may love, others not), and the software/ecosystem, while feature-packed with AI, isn’t as globally ingrained or polished as Samsung’s. Still, for tech enthusiasts, the 17 Pro Max is a dream device that pushes boundaries competitors haven’t.
The AI and Software Face-Off
Both Samsung and Xiaomi are hyping AI capabilities in these devices, aligning with a broader industry trend to make smartphones smarter and more personalized. But their approaches have different flavors:
- Samsung’s AI (One UI 8.5 “Galaxy AI”): Samsung is integrating AI primarily to boost productivity, convenience, and privacy. As mentioned, features like live call translation (so you can speak to someone in another language and see real-time translated subtitles) and AI-generated content (like suggested replies or social post captions based on context) are expected [117]. Samsung has also hinted at on-device AI that can summarize articles or text for you, and even allow multiple AI assistants to reside on the phone (imagine choosing between Bixby’s successor, Google Assistant, or a specialized AI for different tasks) [118]. One interesting leak is that Samsung might introduce selectable AI “agents” – perhaps letting users choose if a Samsung-developed AI or a Google AI handles, say, your voice requests [119]. This could be a response to ensure Samsung’s phones stay competitive as Google and Apple build more AI into Android and iOS. Moreover, Samsung’s AI features will likely include things like smarter image processing (for example, using AI to upscale images or reduce noise beyond traditional algorithms) and device automation (routines that learn your habits). Security AI is also big – e.g., using AI to detect if someone else is trying to unlock your phone by looking at it, etc. And as noted, the rumored “privacy screen” that angles viewing could be using AI to dynamically adjust based on when someone is looking over your shoulder [120]. Analysts see Samsung’s AI push as the company “doubling down” so it isn’t outmatched by Google or Apple in the coming AI-centric era [121]. In essence, Samsung wants the S26 Ultra to feel like a helpful assistant in your pocket that intelligently makes your day easier – whether you’re working, communicating, or just browsing.
- Xiaomi’s AI (HyperOS + XiaoAI): Xiaomi’s take on AI is a bit more lifestyle and user-experience oriented. Xiaomi’s HyperOS uses the XiaoAI assistant not only for voice commands, but to anticipate user needs. For example, the system can learn your daily routine – if you typically open a fitness app when you go to the park, it might pre-load that app at that time or show a widget on the back display unasked [122]. If you plug in headphones, maybe it will surface your music player on the rear screen. XiaoAI also can do things like remind you of events and display QR codes/tickets on the rear display when you arrive at a venue (taking advantage of that second screen for quick access) [123]. In the camera, Xiaomi leverages AI for things like Leica Master AI mode, which can recognize scenes and adjust color tones to mimic Leica’s iconic looks (e.g., for portraits or landscapes). Xiaomi has also embedded some fun AI: those animated pets and themes on the back display are driven by AI algorithms reacting to input (like the pet might get “sad” if your battery is critically low, a subtle prompt to charge) [124]. Additionally, Xiaomi’s voice assistant can have natural conversations in Chinese and control smart home devices, etc., similar to Siri or Google Assistant (though XiaoAI is more China-focused in language support). HyperOS emphasizes seamless connectivity too – using AI to ensure your Xiaomi earbuds, watch, or even car (if it’s a Xiaomi electric car, which exist now) connect and share info smoothly. Xiaomi’s approach is about making the phone feel like a smart companion that integrates into your lifestyle: helping with daily tasks, adding convenience (like casting your phone screen to a Xiaomi TV with one tap, or unlocking your Xiaomi laptop when your phone is nearby), and even entertaining you with novel features (like the retro gaming case which is purely for fun) [125] [126]. One could say Samsung’s AI is more serious and productivity-focused, while Xiaomi’s AI has a more personal and playful bent – although both phones ultimately aim to enhance user experience through machine learning.
Importantly, both devices run Android 16 at their core and will have access to Google’s ecosystem of services (outside China, the Xiaomi 17 series will ship with Google Play, etc., whereas in China it uses Xiaomi’s app store). So you’ll have Google Assistant and all standard Android AI features on both. But the proprietary AI additions from Samsung and Xiaomi will differentiate the user experience. It will be interesting to see which approach users prefer: Samsung’s heavy AI integration into everyday features, or Xiaomi’s subtle AI that learns behavior and adds unique touches.
Market Outlook and Competition
When these two flagship phones go head-to-head in 2026, their fortunes will also depend on external factors – geography, competition from other brands, and consumer trust. Samsung, as the established player, will leverage its global reach. The Galaxy S26 Ultra will be available pretty much worldwide soon after launch: North America, Europe, Asia, etc., with strong carrier partnerships and a marketing blitz. Samsung’s brand is synonymous with Android flagships in many regions, and that carries weight. We can expect big trade-in deals and bundles (e.g., buy an S26 Ultra, get discounted Galaxy Buds or a smartwatch) to drive early adoption. Price-wise, Samsung isn’t shy about charging premium prices – the Ultra could start around $1,299 in the US (similar to S23 Ultra launch) and likely 1,399€ in Europe, with higher prices for max storage models [127]. In some markets like India, import taxes might make it even pricier (one leak suggested roughly ₹159,000 in India, which is nearly $1,900, though that could be for a top-end variant) [128]. Despite the cost, Samsung’s flagships usually sell well to a segment of customers who want the latest Galaxy or who get carrier financing. Xiaomi, on the other hand, will have a more limited market footprint – at least initially. In China, the 17 Pro Max is poised to be a hit among Android enthusiasts, especially those who might otherwise consider an iPhone. Xiaomi has a robust offline and online sales network in China and is pricing the 17 series very competitively to grab market share at the high end [129] [130]. In the first few weeks, Xiaomi will mostly be focusing on meeting Chinese demand. For global markets, Xiaomi usually releases its flagships in select countries: India (often under the Xiaomi or Redmi sub-brand), parts of Southeast Asia, and Europe (Spain, Italy, etc., where Xiaomi has an official presence). By early 2026, we anticipate at least the Xiaomi 17 Pro or Pro Max to launch in Europe and India, likely at slightly higher prices than the direct yuan-to-dollar conversion but still undercutting Samsung. For example, the 17 Pro Max might land in Europe around €999, which would still be a bargain relative to a €1399 Samsung Ultra. Xiaomi will likely emphasize its partnership with Leica and the unique features to carve a niche among tech enthusiasts outside China. However, brand perception could be a challenge: in markets like Europe, Xiaomi is known but not as prestigious as Samsung or Apple. Consumers spending $1000+ might gravitate to the brands with a longer premium track record. Xiaomi will rely on tech media coverage (which has been positive, highlighting how the 17 series “wants to crush the iPhone 17” [131] [132]) and word-of-mouth in enthusiast communities.
The competition landscape in 2026 will also include other players:
- Apple’s iPhone 17 series (launched September 2025) and the subsequent iPhone 18 (expected in Sept 2026) will be the benchmark for many buyers. Apple’s iPhone 17 Pro/Pro Max reportedly introduced their own new features like an “iPhone Air” variant and camera upgrades, but Xiaomi clearly targeted the iPhone 17 in its launch (even matching the naming). In China, Apple is the rival to beat – and Xiaomi’s huge battery and lower price are key selling points against the iPhone. Internationally, though, many premium users are locked into Apple’s iOS ecosystem, which Xiaomi and Samsung both acknowledge is hard to break. Xiaomi’s strategy of specs and pricing is to tempt those who might be on the fence (“specs bragging rights” can sway some Android users who might otherwise consider switching to Apple). Samsung’s strategy is a bit different; Samsung competes with Apple by offering features Apple doesn’t (stylus, more customization, etc.) and by collaborating with Google (Samsung phones come with Google services fully, which some users prefer over Apple’s walled garden).
- OnePlus and other Chinese brands: OnePlus (now effectively under Oppo) is launching its own 2025/2026 flagship, the OnePlus 15, around the same time. Interestingly, OnePlus is following a similar numbering jump – it’s reportedly skipping a “OnePlus 14” and going straight to 15 for 2025 [133], partially due to the fact that “14” is considered unlucky in Chinese (and maybe to align with year ’25). The OnePlus 15 is rumored to have a 7,000 mAh battery and 100+ W charging just like Xiaomi [134], showing that Chinese manufacturers are converging on the formula of bigger battery + faster charge as a competitive angle against Samsung. OnePlus might not match Xiaomi’s second screen or Leica cameras, but it will compete on price (OnePlus 15 is expected to be a bit cheaper than Xiaomi 17 Pro Max) and software (a clean OxygenOS experience with promised updates, appealing to a different segment of Android enthusiasts). Samsung thus faces pressure not just from Xiaomi but a general wave of Chinese flagships that are pushing specs boundaries – be it OnePlus, Oppo Find series, or Vivo X series (Vivo and Oppo also often include gimbal cameras or 1-inch sensors, etc.). However, many of those brands also have limited presence in the West now (due to retrenchment in 2023–2024), which leaves Samsung safe in markets like the US where it’s basically Apple vs Samsung.
- Google’s Pixel series: By early 2026, Google might have the Pixel 9 or Pixel 10 on the market. Pixels usually don’t compete on hardware brute force (they often have smaller batteries and not the absolute top specs), but they are showcases for Android’s latest software and AI (e.g., Google Assistant features, Magic Eraser, Call Screen). Samsung is trying to pre-empt some Pixel advantages by adding similar AI features into One UI. Xiaomi’s focus on hardware means it’s less directly concerned with Pixel (they cater to different audiences: Pixel for those who want pure Google experience and camera software magic, Xiaomi for those who want maximal hardware value). In any case, Pixel volumes are comparatively small, and Google’s flagships usually top out at ~6.7″ screens, so someone wanting a gigantic phone might lean Samsung or Xiaomi Ultra devices anyway.
- Huawei and others: In China, Huawei has seen a resurgence with its Mate and P series (now with their own Kirin chips again and 5G returned). Huawei’s latest flagships (like Mate 60 series) also emphasize battery life and camera, and crucially they operate without Google services which confines them mostly to China. Huawei sits in a similar premium bracket; if anything, Xiaomi’s aggressive push is also to fend off Huawei domestically. Internationally, Huawei is still heavily sanctioned, so they’re not a big factor for global markets, which benefits Xiaomi as it has one less competitor outside China.
- The Ultra-Premium Niche: It’s worth noting neither Samsung nor Xiaomi has a foldable mentioned here – the Galaxy Z Fold series is Samsung’s other “ultra-premium” line, and Xiaomi has foldables too. But for this comparison, we’re focusing on slab phones. Some power users might cross-shop the S26 Ultra with a Galaxy Z Fold 5 (or Fold 6 by 2026) if they’re willing to spend more for a foldable screen. Xiaomi’s strategy, interestingly, was to deliver some “foldable” perks (like a cover screen) in a regular phone with the 17 Pro Max’s back display – possibly aiming at users who find foldables cool but not practical.
All told, the flagship phone war of 2026 is shaping up to be one of the most exciting in years. Xiaomi’s entry with the 17 Pro Max demonstrates that the challenger brands are not content to play second fiddle – they are willing to one-up Apple and Samsung in specs and even mimic their strategies (naming, design cues) to grab mindshare [135] [136]. Samsung, for its part, is not standing still: it’s incorporating more AI and offering a full package that goes beyond just raw specs, hoping to entice consumers with the experience as much as the hardware.
As one expert from PhoneArena noted, on paper Xiaomi has assembled a near “stacked for victory” package with the 17 Pro Max – it ticks every spec box [137]. But Samsung’s strength lies in years of fine-tuning and the trust it has earned among high-end users (and let’s not forget, Samsung will surely advertise its phones like crazy, whereas Xiaomi’s marketing globally is relatively modest). For many buyers, factors like after-sales support, software updates, and resale value matter – areas where Samsung tends to have an edge. Xiaomi will argue that the sheer value proposition of the 17 Pro Max (premium specs at 2/3 the price) is enough to overcome those softer factors.
Conclusion: Two Titans, Two Philosophies
The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra and the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max represent two compelling – and markedly different – visions of a 2026 ultra-flagship. Samsung’s approach is an evolutionary refinement: it takes the familiar Galaxy Ultra template and improves it in sensible ways (faster charging, better cameras, deeper AI integration), all while leaning on the strength of the Galaxy ecosystem and brand [138] [139]. It’s a device that says, “if you liked the last Galaxy, we’ve made it even better and smarter.” In contrast, Xiaomi’s approach with the 17 Pro Max is almost revolutionary: it throws in every high-end component and even a few industry-first features, and then prices it surprisingly aggressively [140]. It’s a phone that seems to shout, “look at me – bigger battery, more screens, same chip as the future, and it costs hundreds less than the rest.”
Which one is “better” ultimately depends on what you value as a user. If you prioritize raw power, battery endurance, and pushing the spec sheet to the max, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max clearly wins on paper in those categories. It’s the choice for the tech enthusiast who wants the largest battery, a flashy new design twist, and top-notch performance without paying $1200+ [141]. On the other hand, if you value the refined experience, brand reliability, and ecosystem perks (like a great warranty, easy support, and integration with your laptop, tablet, smartwatch, etc.), the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra holds the edge. Samsung’s phone will also likely have more advanced software features (especially in AI and security) and the unique productivity boost of the S Pen stylus – things that are hard to quantify on a spec sheet but can enhance day-to-day usage [142]. Additionally, for those who need a phone that just works everywhere with full network compatibility and warranty support, Samsung is the safer bet globally.
It’s also worth considering that Xiaomi intentionally built the 17 series to take on Apple’s iPhone, and in doing so it has also put Samsung on notice. By matching Apple’s naming and going after Apple’s weaknesses (battery life and value), Xiaomi signaled it’s ready to play in the big leagues. Samsung, meanwhile, is navigating competition on two fronts: it has to stay ahead of Android rivals like Xiaomi/OnePlus and continue to differentiate from Apple’s iPhones. Thus, Samsung’s heavy emphasis on AI features and integration can be seen as trying to one-up Google’s AI on Android and pre-empt any future Apple AI moves. It’s a different kind of spec – a “smart spec” – that Samsung hopes will sway consumers beyond just gigahertz and megapixels.
In the end, we have two titans here aiming at slightly different targets. Xiaomi’s 17 Pro Max is gunning to win spec battles and convert spec-conscious buyers (especially in China and possibly in tech circles abroad) by offering more for less. Samsung’s S26 Ultra is focusing on the holistic premium experience – it wants to be the phone that may not have the absolute biggest battery or fastest charger, but is so well-rounded and smart that it wins users’ hearts (and wallets) anyway.
For consumers in 2026, this is a great situation: choice has never been better at the high end of Android. Do you want the phone that charges in 20 minutes and lasts two days? Xiaomi says here you go. Do you want the phone that can replace your notebook and translate calls on the fly? Samsung has you covered. We won’t know the true winner of this matchup until Samsung officially launches the S26 Ultra and both devices can be directly compared in real-world tests. But one thing is certain – the flagship war of 2026 is heating up, and both Samsung and Xiaomi have brought their A-game [143]. Ultimately, the “best” flagship might not be an absolute; it will come down to which device’s philosophy aligns more with your needs: the polished all-rounder or the bold game-changer. Either way, tech fans will have a lot to talk about in this clash of titans.
Sources: This report references information and commentary from authoritative tech publications and analysts, including PhoneArena, The Verge, Wired, Tom’s Guide, TechRadar, and South China Morning Post, as well as official launch details from Xiaomi. All specs for the unreleased Galaxy S26 Ultra are based on credible leaks and rumors (subject to confirmation at launch) [144] [145] [146]. The Xiaomi 17 Pro Max’s specs and features are drawn from its official announcement and early hands-on reviews [147] [148], providing a current snapshot of how these two flagship phones compare as we head into 2026.
References
1. ts2.tech, 2. ts2.tech, 3. ts2.tech, 4. ts2.tech, 5. ts2.tech, 6. ts2.tech, 7. ts2.tech, 8. ts2.tech, 9. ts2.tech, 10. ts2.tech, 11. ts2.tech, 12. ts2.tech, 13. ts2.tech, 14. ts2.tech, 15. ts2.tech, 16. ts2.tech, 17. ts2.tech, 18. ts2.tech, 19. ts2.tech, 20. ts2.tech, 21. ts2.tech, 22. ts2.tech, 23. ts2.tech, 24. ts2.tech, 25. ts2.tech, 26. ts2.tech, 27. ts2.tech, 28. ts2.tech, 29. ts2.tech, 30. ts2.tech, 31. ts2.tech, 32. ts2.tech, 33. ts2.tech, 34. ts2.tech, 35. ts2.tech, 36. ts2.tech, 37. ts2.tech, 38. ts2.tech, 39. ts2.tech, 40. ts2.tech, 41. ts2.tech, 42. ts2.tech, 43. ts2.tech, 44. ts2.tech, 45. ts2.tech, 46. ts2.tech, 47. ts2.tech, 48. ts2.tech, 49. ts2.tech, 50. ts2.tech, 51. ts2.tech, 52. ts2.tech, 53. www.theverge.com, 54. www.scmp.com, 55. www.theverge.com, 56. www.theverge.com, 57. www.scmp.com, 58. www.scmp.com, 59. ts2.tech, 60. ts2.tech, 61. ts2.tech, 62. ts2.tech, 63. www.theverge.com, 64. ts2.tech, 65. ts2.tech, 66. www.phonearena.com, 67. ts2.tech, 68. ts2.tech, 69. ts2.tech, 70. ts2.tech, 71. ts2.tech, 72. www.theverge.com, 73. ts2.tech, 74. ts2.tech, 75. ts2.tech, 76. ts2.tech, 77. ts2.tech, 78. ts2.tech, 79. www.phonearena.com, 80. www.phonearena.com, 81. ts2.tech, 82. ts2.tech, 83. ts2.tech, 84. ts2.tech, 85. ts2.tech, 86. www.phonearena.com, 87. ts2.tech, 88. www.phonearena.com, 89. ts2.tech, 90. ts2.tech, 91. ts2.tech, 92. ts2.tech, 93. ts2.tech, 94. www.theverge.com, 95. www.phonearena.com, 96. ts2.tech, 97. www.theverge.com, 98. www.theverge.com, 99. ts2.tech, 100. ts2.tech, 101. www.scmp.com, 102. ts2.tech, 103. ts2.tech, 104. ts2.tech, 105. ts2.tech, 106. ts2.tech, 107. ts2.tech, 108. ts2.tech, 109. www.theverge.com, 110. ts2.tech, 111. ts2.tech, 112. ts2.tech, 113. ts2.tech, 114. ts2.tech, 115. ts2.tech, 116. ts2.tech, 117. ts2.tech, 118. ts2.tech, 119. ts2.tech, 120. ts2.tech, 121. ts2.tech, 122. ts2.tech, 123. ts2.tech, 124. ts2.tech, 125. ts2.tech, 126. www.theverge.com, 127. ts2.tech, 128. ts2.tech, 129. www.scmp.com, 130. www.scmp.com, 131. www.phonearena.com, 132. www.phonearena.com, 133. www.theverge.com, 134. ts2.tech, 135. ts2.tech, 136. www.scmp.com, 137. ts2.tech, 138. ts2.tech, 139. ts2.tech, 140. ts2.tech, 141. ts2.tech, 142. ts2.tech, 143. ts2.tech, 144. ts2.tech, 145. www.scmp.com, 146. www.theverge.com, 147. ts2.tech, 148. www.phonearena.com
