Air Products (APD) Stock Hits 52‑Week Low After Yara Hydrogen Deal: What the Latest Drop Means for 2026

Updated December 9, 2025

Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. (NYSE: APD) has just had one of its roughest trading sessions in years. Shares dropped roughly 9–10% to around $236, hitting a new 52‑week low near $235.5 and leaving the stock down about 18% year to date and roughly 25% over the past 12 months. ^[1]

The selloff follows the company’s announcement that it is in advanced negotiations with Yara International ASA on two large low‑emission ammonia projects in Louisiana and Saudi Arabia—deals that could reshape Air Products’ risk profile for years to come. ^[2]

At the same time, Wall Street analysts still broadly rate APD a “Buy” / “Outperform”, with an average 12‑month price target in the $305–315 range—implying roughly 30–35% upside from current levels if those projections prove correct. ^[3]

This article reviews the latest news (as of December 9, 2025), recent earnings, the Yara partnership, analyst forecasts and key risks for Air Products stock.

Note: This article is for information only and is not investment advice.

Key takeaways

• APD stock just hit a new 52‑week low around $235–236 after the Yara hydrogen/ammonia deal triggered a sharp ~9–10% one‑day drop, making it the worst performer in the S&P 500 on Monday. ^[4]
• Air Products and Yara are negotiating two long‑dated low‑carbon ammonia partnerships in Louisiana and at the NEOM green hydrogen project in Saudi Arabia, with final investment decisions targeted for mid‑2026 and completion around 2030. ^[5]
• Fiscal 2025 earnings were messy on a GAAP basis due to about $3.7 billion in restructuring and asset charges, but adjusted EPS of $3.39 in Q4 and $12.03 for the year slightly beat expectations; management guides to 7–9% EPS growth in 2026 and about $4 billion of capex. ^[6]
• Dividend investors still see a strong income story: APD has raised its dividend for 50 consecutive years, pays $7.16 per share annually, and currently yields around 3% at the new lower share price. ^[7]
• Analyst views are split between “oversold” and “still expensive”: many houses maintain Buy/Outperform ratings and see ~30%+ upside, while some valuation screens flag APD as failing most value tests and warn about execution/commodity‑price risk on its hydrogen mega‑projects. ^[8]

Why APD stock plunged to a 52‑week low

On Monday, December 8, Air Products closed down more than 9%, leading losers in the S&P 500 even as the broader market fell only modestly on higher bond yields. ^[9]

Market commentary from Barchart and Stocktwits ties the drop directly to the new disclosures about the company’s advanced negotiations with Yara on low‑emission ammonia projects: ^[10]

• APD shares fell more than 9%, marking the worst single‑day performance since February 2024 and the biggest decline in the S&P 500 that day. ^[11]
• The stock touched a 52‑week low around $235.5, with one report citing a 52‑week range of roughly $235.5 to $341.1. ^[12]
• Year‑to‑date, APD is now down around 18%, and roughly 25% over the past 12 months. ^[13]

In other words, the market is not questioning whether hydrogen and low‑carbon ammonia are important; it’s questioning how much risk Air Products is taking on to be a key player—and how attractive the economics will be once these projects finally start generating cash.

Inside the Yara partnership: de‑risking or shifting the risk?

The centerpiece of Air Products’ recent news is its evolving relationship with Norwegian fertilizer giant Yara International.

1. Louisiana Clean Energy Complex (blue hydrogen / low‑carbon ammonia)

According to a detailed summary from RTTNews via Nasdaq: ^[14]

• Air Products is developing what it describes as the world’s largest low‑carbon energy complex in Louisiana, designed to produce more than 750 million standard cubic feet per day of low‑carbon hydrogen, capturing about 95% of the CO₂ generated.
• The project cost is estimated at $8–9 billion.
• Air Products will build, own and operate the industrial gas facilities.
• Once performance tests are met, Yara would buy the ammonia production, storage and shipping assets for roughly 25% of the total project cost, integrating them into its global ammonia network.
• Under a 25‑year offtake agreement, around 80% of the hydrogen from the complex would go to Yara, which would use it to produce about 2.8 million tonnes per year of low‑carbon ammonia.
• The remaining 20% of hydrogen would feed Air Products’ existing 700‑mile Gulf Coast pipeline, serving other industrial customers.
• Around 5 million tonnes of CO₂ per year would be sequestered under a separate long‑term agreement.

Final investment decisions (FIDs) for both partners are targeted by mid‑2026, with project completion expected around 2030. ^[15]

From Air Products’ perspective, this structure:

• Reduces capital intensity on the ammonia side by selling those assets to Yara.
• Locks in long‑term volume via the 25‑year hydrogen offtake.
• Leaves APD heavily exposed to project execution, capex discipline and long‑duration energy policy.

2. NEOM Green Hydrogen Project (Saudi Arabia)

The partnership also extends to the NEOM Green Hydrogen Project in Saudi Arabia, where Air Products is the sole offtaker of renewable ammonia from a massive wind‑ and solar‑powered complex. ^[16]

Key points from company statements and coverage:

• NEOM is now reported to be over 90% complete, with commercial production expected to start in 2027. ^[17]
• Air Products will be the sole offtaker of up to 1.2 million tonnes of renewable ammonia per year. ^[18]
• Air Products and Yara plan a marketing and distribution agreement, targeted for the first half of 2026, under which Yara will sell on a commission basis any ammonia not sold directly by Air Products as renewable hydrogen in Europe. ^[19]

Why are investors uneasy?

Stocktwits and other coverage highlight a key concern from Mizuho: under the proposed structure, Air Products would retain price risk on NEOM ammonia—benefiting if prices are strong but exposed if global ammonia prices weaken—while Yara focuses on volumes and earns a commission on sales. ^[20]

The market reaction suggests investors worry that:

• APD is committing tens of billions in capital across blue and green hydrogen projects.
• The returns depend on long‑term commodity prices, carbon policy and customer demand.
• The Yara partnership, while helpful on volume and capital sharing, still leaves Air Products with meaningful residual risk.

Fiscal 2025 earnings: big charges, but a still‑profitable core

Before the Yara headlines, Air Products had already reported a complicated fiscal 2025.

Headline results

From the company’s November 6 earnings release and call transcript: ^[21]

• Fiscal 2025 GAAP results were heavily impacted by roughly $3.7 billion of pre‑tax charges tied to business and asset actions (including project reviews and portfolio moves).
• GAAP metrics therefore showed negative net margins and very weak reported EPS.
• On an adjusted basis, however:
  • Q4 adjusted EPS was $3.39, slightly above the $3.38 consensus. ^[22]
  • Q4 revenue came in around $3.17 billion, just below expectations. ^[23]
  • Full‑year adjusted EPS came in at about $12.03, down roughly 3% year on year. ^[24]
  • Revenue for the year was roughly $12.0 billion, down about 0.5% vs. 2024, continuing a flat‑to‑slightly‑down trend in recent years. ^[25]

Operationally:

• The company maintained a robust adjusted operating margin in the mid‑20% range (around 23–24%) and a return on capital near 10%, despite weak industrial volumes. ^[26]
• Management emphasized strong growth in its electronics segment, now approaching a fifth of total sales, as a structural demand driver. ^[27]
• Air Products announced a significant cost‑cutting program, including a roughly 16% reduction in workforce, aimed at supporting margins while funding its energy‑transition portfolio. ^[28]

2026 guidance

Looking ahead to fiscal 2026, Air Products guided to: ^[29]

• Adjusted EPS of $12.85–13.15, implying 7–9% growth.
• Q1 2026 adjusted EPS in the $2.95–3.10 range.
• Around $4 billion of capital expenditures, much of it aimed at hydrogen and related projects.
• The company expects to be modestly cash‑flow positive, even after heavy capex.

Analysts expect about $12.7 of adjusted EPS over the coming year, broadly consistent with management’s range. ^[30]

At the current share price near $236, that implies a forward P/E in the high teens, even after the post‑Yara selloff.

Dividend, balance sheet and “income plus growth” profile

One reason APD remains on many institutional watchlists: its dividend record is elite.

According to MarketBeat’s dividend data and company announcements: ^[31]

• Air Products has increased its dividend for 50 consecutive years, putting it solidly in “dividend aristocrat” territory.
• The current annual dividend is $7.16 per share, paid quarterly ($1.79 per quarter).
• At a share price around $235–236, that equates to a dividend yield of roughly 3.0–3.1%.
• The next scheduled dividend of $1.79 is expected to be paid on February 9, 2026, with an ex‑dividend date around January 2, 2026.
• Over the past five years, the dividend has grown at an annualized rate of about 6.6%.

Because GAAP earnings are temporarily depressed by restructuring and project charges, the payout ratio looks extremely high on an earnings basis (over 400% of GAAP EPS), but much more reasonable—around 40% of cash flow—when viewed on a cash and adjusted‑earnings basis. ^[32]

On leverage, MarketBeat’s profile for APD shows: ^[33]

• Debt‑to‑equity near 0.98.
• Solid liquidity with current and quick ratios above 1.2x, consistent with an investment‑grade industrial issuer.

For income‑oriented investors, APD now combines:

• A 3%+ dividend yield,
• A long streak of annual increases, and
• A management team clearly committed to maintaining and growing the payout, even through a capex‑heavy transition phase.

The trade‑off is that a larger portion of the balance sheet is being devoted to long‑dated, policy‑sensitive hydrogen projects rather than shorter‑cycle traditional industrial gas investments.

How analysts and models view APD after the selloff

Despite the dramatic price action, Wall Street is not treating APD as a broken story—at least not yet.

Street ratings and targets

A sampling of recent data from MarketBeat, Benzinga, StockAnalysis and Public.com shows: ^[34]

• Consensus rating:
  • MarketBeat: “Moderate Buy” with 1 Strong Buy, 9 Buy, 4 Hold and 1 Sell.
  • Benzinga summarizes the consensus as “Outperform”.
• Average 12‑month price target:
  • Around $313–315 across 20+ analysts, with a high near $360+ and a low in the mid‑$240s.
  • StockAnalysis and Public.com both show an average target around $308, implying roughly 30% upside from current levels.
• Most recent actions:
  • Wolfe Research reiterated an Outperform rating and $315 price target on December 8 after the Yara news, calling the partnership “a step in the right direction” with a high‑quality partner that can reduce project risk. ^[35]
  • Mizuho, RBC, Wells Fargo and Evercore ISI have all trimmed targets but generally kept Buy/Overweight/Outperform ratings, with recent targets clustered between $300 and $330. ^[36]

In other words, many analysts see APD’s current price as oversold relative to its long‑term earnings power, assuming the hydrogen projects deliver returns roughly in line with management’s expectations.

Valuation models and red flags

Not everyone is enthusiastic. Several valuation‑focused services are more cautious:

• A recent analysis flagged Air Products as scoring just 1 out of 6 on its internal valuation checks, citing concerns about the relationship between price, earnings, and projected returns. ^[37]
• A prior “bull case” piece at Yahoo Finance pointed out that owning APD increasingly requires confidence that very large hydrogen and ammonia bets will eventually translate into attractive returns, given the capital intensity and long payback periods. ^[38]
• Smartkarma’s factor‑based “Smart Score” assigns APD a mixed 3.2/5 score, with strong marks for Dividend and Momentum but weaker scores on Value, Growth and Resilience, indicating that the stock screens well for income and recent share‑price action but less well on traditional value metrics. ^[39]

Some quantitative tools, including InvestingPro, also note that APD still screens as overvalued versus their fair‑value estimates, even after the post‑Yara drop—underscoring how much optimism about future hydrogen cash flows remains embedded in the stock. ^[40]

Strategic context: Air Products between “old industrial” and “energy transition giant”

The story behind the numbers is that Air Products is trying to straddle two worlds:

1. Traditional industrial gases – long‑term contracts with steel, chemicals, electronics and healthcare customers; relatively predictable cash flows; high switching costs.
2. Energy‑transition mega‑projects – multi‑billion‑dollar hydrogen, ammonia and CO₂‑capture projects with timelines stretching to 2030 and beyond.

Recent company materials and earnings commentary highlight: ^[41]

• The NEOM project, now over 90% complete, is expected to be a flagship green hydrogen/ammonia complex, potentially making APD one of the largest suppliers of renewable ammonia globally.
• The Louisiana Clean Energy Complex integrates blue hydrogen, extensive CO₂ capture and long‑term offtake with a top‑tier agricultural partner (Yara).
• Management positions Air Products as a “picks and shovels” supplier to the low‑carbon economy, analogously to how it has long supplied oxygen and nitrogen to heavy industry.

From an equity‑holder’s standpoint, that means:

• If these projects work: APD could see multi‑decade contracted cash flows and a defensible position in low‑carbon molecules, on top of its established industrial gases base.
• If they disappoint: Investors could be left with lower‑than‑expected returns on tens of billions of capital, possible additional write‑downs, and a balance sheet more stretched than traditional industrial gas peers.

The newly announced cooperation with Yara is an attempt to share risk and tap an experienced marketer of ammonia, but it has simultaneously forced the market to re‑price the risk side of the ledger.

Key risks and catalysts to watch

Based on the latest public information and analyst commentary, several themes will likely drive APD’s stock from here:

1. Final Yara agreements and FIDs (2026)

• Clarity on exact contract terms, return expectations and capital commitments could either reassure or further unsettle investors.
• FIDs for the Louisiana and NEOM‑related structures, targeted by mid‑2026, will be a major milestone. ^[42]

2. Ammonia and hydrogen pricing

• Mizuho’s concern that APD may be “at the mercy” of market ammonia prices for NEOM volumes crystallizes a core risk: a policy‑driven market can be volatile, and weak ammonia prices could choke project returns. ^[43]

3. Policy and regulatory frameworks

• Many of these projects implicitly rely on carbon pricing, tax credits and regulatory support in the U.S., Europe and the Middle East. Shifts in policy could materially alter project economics. ^[44]

4. Execution and cost control

• Large‑scale projects are prone to cost overruns and delays. While NEOM is reportedly over 90% complete and Louisiana is earlier in its life, any major slippage would likely be punished by the market. ^[45]

5. Balance‑sheet flexibility

• With capex of about $4 billion a year and a nearly 1:1 debt‑to‑equity ratio, how much additional leverage the company is willing to take on—without jeopardizing its dividend track record—will be closely watched. ^[46]

6. Further analyst revisions

• Any significant downgrades or target cuts from key banks, or conversely upgrades on valuation grounds if the stock falls further, could amplify moves in APD’s price. ^[47]

Bottom line: a classic long‑duration risk–reward dilemma

As of December 9, 2025, Air Products stock reflects a sharp clash between near‑term fear and long‑term ambition:

• Near term: The market is re‑pricing hydrogen and ammonia mega‑projects as real financial risks, not just glossy “energy transition” slides. The one‑day 9%+ drop and new 52‑week low underscore how uncomfortable investors are with the Yara‑linked project structure and the sheer size of APD’s commitments. ^[48]
• Long term: The Street still broadly believes APD can grow adjusted EPS in the high single digits, maintain its dividend growth streak, and eventually harvest attractive returns from NEOM, Louisiana and similar projects—hence the consensus price targets 30%+ above current levels. ^[49]

For investors, APD now looks less like a sleepy industrial gas “bond proxy” and more like a high‑quality but high‑commitment energy‑transition bet:

• The reward case rests on decades of contracted low‑carbon volumes, a differentiated asset base and a premium in the market for “clean molecules.”
• The risk case centers on capital intensity, commodity‑price exposure, policy uncertainty and the opportunity cost of tying so much balance sheet capacity to a handful of megaprojects.

Anyone considering APD needs to weigh those trade‑offs against their own risk tolerance, time horizon and diversification. For some, the combination of a 3% yield, 50‑year dividend growth streak and potential upside if hydrogen economics prove favorable will justify the volatility; for others, the project concentration and valuation may remain a deal‑breaker.

References

1. www.smartkarma.com, 2. www.nasdaq.com, 3. www.marketbeat.com, 4. www.tradingview.com, 5. www.nasdaq.com, 6. www.investing.com, 7. www.marketbeat.com, 8. www.marketbeat.com, 9. www.tradingview.com, 10. www.tradingview.com, 11. stocktwits.com, 12. www.investing.com, 13. www.smartkarma.com, 14. www.nasdaq.com, 15. www.nasdaq.com, 16. www.nasdaq.com, 17. www.investing.com, 18. www.nasdaq.com, 19. www.nasdaq.com, 20. stocktwits.com, 21. www.prnewswire.com, 22. www.investing.com, 23. www.investing.com, 24. www.investing.com, 25. www.macrotrends.net, 26. www.investing.com, 27. www.investing.com, 28. www.investing.com, 29. www.investing.com, 30. www.marketbeat.com, 31. www.marketbeat.com, 32. www.marketbeat.com, 33. www.marketbeat.com, 34. www.marketbeat.com, 35. www.investing.com, 36. www.marketbeat.com, 37. finance.yahoo.com, 38. finance.yahoo.com, 39. www.smartkarma.com, 40. www.investing.com, 41. www.investing.com, 42. www.nasdaq.com, 43. stocktwits.com, 44. www.nasdaq.com, 45. www.investing.com, 46. www.marketbeat.com, 47. www.marketbeat.com, 48. www.tradingview.com, 49. www.marketbeat.com