Apple HomePod 3 vs. The Smart Speaker Competition: 2025’s Ultimate Showdown

• HomePod 3 gets a screen: Apple’s next HomePod (3rd gen) is expected in late 2025 with a 7-inch touchscreen and built-in camera for FaceTime, effectively turning it into a smart display ^{[1] [2]}. This would put it in direct competition with Amazon’s Echo Show and Google’s Nest Hub devices.
• High-end sound hardware: The HomePod family is renowned for premium sound – the current model packs a 4-inch woofer and five tweeters for 360° audio ^[3] – while Amazon’s Echo Studio counters with a larger 5.25-inch subwoofer plus multiple midrange drivers and a tweeter for immersive bass and spatial audio support ^[4]. Google’s Nest Audio is more modest (one woofer + one tweeter), and audiophile options like the Sonos Era 300 go even further with six drivers (though at a higher price).
• Smarter voice assistants: All three ecosystems are racing to upgrade their AIs. Siri has historically lagged behind Alexa and Google Assistant in understanding and versatility ^[5], but Apple is developing a “Siri 2.0” with AI enhancements slated to debut with the HomePod 3. Amazon has already launched Alexa+, a next-gen Alexa that uses generative AI for more conversational, multi-step interactions ^[6] (free for Prime members). Google, meanwhile, is replacing Google Assistant with “Gemini” AI on Nest devices starting October 2025, promising more natural back-and-forth conversations ^{[7] [8]}.
• Smart home integration: Apple’s HomePod serves as a hub for HomeKit and now supports Thread and Matter standards to control compatible gadgets ^[9]. However, HomeKit’s device ecosystem remains more limited – Apple still trails Amazon and Google in third-party smart home support ^[10]. Amazon Echo and Google Nest speakers work with tens of thousands of devices via Alexa and Google Home, and all three brands now support the universal Matter protocol (for easier cross-platform device pairing).
• Ecosystem lock-in vs. openness: Apple’s approach is the most walled-off – for example, HomePod can’t natively play Spotify via Siri (Apple Music is the default) and essentially requires an iPhone for setup and control ^[11]. In contrast, Amazon and Google speakers work with a broad array of music services (Spotify, Apple Music, etc.) and support both iOS and Android. Alexa’s platform even includes a built-in Zigbee smart home hub on certain Echo models for direct control of Zigbee devices (a feature Apple and Google lack) ^[12].
• Design and build quality: The HomePod’s design is a sleek cylindrical mesh fabric shell with a backlit touch surface on top – standing ~6.6 inches (168 mm) tall and weighing 5.16 lbs (2.3 kg) ^[13] – exuding Apple’s premium build quality. Amazon’s Echo devices vary: the standard Echo is spherical with a fabric cover, while the high-end Echo Studio is a larger cylinder (8×7 inches) in charcoal or white fabric with physical buttons for volume and mute ^[14]. Google’s Nest speakers favor minimalist fabric-wrapped designs in soft colors to blend into home decor. All are solidly built; Apple and Sonos lean toward a more luxurious feel, whereas Amazon and Google prioritize friendly, practical design (even experimenting with novel form factors like Amazon’s new 21-inch Echo Show).
• Price and value: Apple positions the HomePod as a premium speaker – the current HomePod (2nd gen) launched at $299 (down from $349 for the original) and the mini at $99. Competing smart speakers are generally cheaper: Amazon’s flagship Echo Studio is ~$200 and Google’s Nest Audio $99, with frequent deep discounts on Echo Dots and Nest Minis. Reviewers note that Apple’s $299 price “doubles” the cost if you want a stereo pair, whereas rival premium speakers land closer to the $200 range ^[15]. The upcoming HomePod 3 with a display is rumored to cost around $249 for the base device – potentially $499+ with its docking speaker base accessory ^[16] – putting it in the high-end territory of Google’s Pixel Tablet + Dock or a mid-sized TV.
• Software updates and longevity: Apple supports its HomePods with regular software updates (the HomePod 2 received new features like sound recognition for alarms via software ^[17]). Siri’s responsiveness has improved – the 2023 HomePod was noted to answer faster than before ^[18] – but its capabilities remained essentially unchanged, pending the Siri 2.0 overhaul. Amazon and Google continually update Alexa and Assistant on the back end, so their speakers often gain features over time without hardware upgrades. Notably, Amazon’s Alexa+ rollout does come with a privacy change: voice requests on Alexa+ are all processed in the cloud (Amazon retired the option for fully local processing) ^[19]. Google’s new AI assistant will likewise have free vs. paid tiers for certain advanced features (details still TBD) ^[20]. All the major players now support Matter and will serve as Thread border routers on newer models, which should future-proof them for emerging smart home devices ^{[21] [22]}.
• Upcoming competitors and launches: The smart speaker arena is heating up heading into 2025. Apple HomePod 3 – with its tablet-like display – is slated for release around Q3 2025 (after WWDC) if Siri’s development stays on track ^{[23] [24]}. Google has an event on October 1, 2025 to introduce Gemini for Home, where a new Nest “Home Speaker” is expected. Leaks suggest this compact speaker (teased during the Pixel 10 launch) will come in multiple colors, feature an LED light ring at its base, and notably pair with TVs for spatial audio – a trick borrowed from Apple’s HomePods ^[25]. It will have sound detection for things like glass breaks or smoke alarms and full Matter support built-in ^[26]. We also anticipate a long-overdue refresh to the Google Nest Hub smart display line, since the Nest Hub hasn’t been updated since 2021 and Google’s new AI works best with a screen ^[27]. Amazon, for its part, introduced an extra-large Echo Show 21 and a revamped wall-mounted Echo Hub controller in 2025, showcasing Alexa’s move into more proactive home hub roles ^[28]. While no standard Echo 5th-gen has been announced yet, Amazon is expected to continue iterating its Echo lineup with deeper Alexa+ integration. In addition, Apple isn’t ignoring the lower end – a HomePod mini 2 with a new chip (S9) and better sound is reportedly in the pipeline to debut alongside the next-gen Siri features ^[29].

Sound Quality & Speaker Hardware

When it comes to audio performance, Apple’s HomePod line has set a high bar for what a “smart speaker” can sound like. The HomePod 2nd generation inherited the original’s acoustic prowess: it features a single 4-inch high-excursion woofer for deep, authoritative bass and a ring of five horn-loaded tweeters for clear highs ^[30]. Each tweeter is beamforming, meaning the HomePod actively shapes the sound field and, with an array of built-in microphones, it auto-calibrates to its environment in real time. Place it against a wall or in an open room, and it senses the acoustics and adjusts output for optimal balance ^[31]. This was a standout feature of the original HomePod and continues in HomePod 2, giving it an edge in effortless setup – you get great sound without manually tweaking EQ. Reviewers note the HomePod’s sound is rich and room-filling; Apple’s support for Spatial Audio (Dolby Atmos) on HomePod means it can even render immersive 3D sound from Apple Music tracks or when used as TV speakers ^{[32] [33]}.

The HomePod 3 is expected to retain a strong focus on audio quality but with a twist – because it’s reportedly adding a screen and smart hub functions, some rumors suggest it may have slightly less emphasis on audio hardware than its predecessors ^[34]. (Apple appears to be positioning it as a hybrid device, akin to an “iPad mini docked to a HomePod”.) Still, it’s likely to at least match the HomePod 2’s audio chops. Leaked info points to a device “a little smaller than the iPad mini…roughly the size of the Amazon Echo Hub” ^[35], with a detachable or dockable tablet-like display. One patent even shows a design with a pill-shaped dock for the screen ^[36]. If that screen unit houses the speakers, it may not accommodate as many drivers as the purely audio-focused HomePod 2. However, Apple could use the dock as a subwoofer/speaker base ^[37]. In any case, we expect premium sound from HomePod 3, even if Apple might allow that some users will buy it more for the display and smart home control than audiophile listening.

On the Amazon side, the top-of-line Echo Studio is the closest competitor in sound quality. It’s physically larger than the HomePod (about 8 inches tall vs 6.6 inches) and heavier at 7.7 lbs vs 5.16 lbs ^{[38] [39]}. Inside, the Echo Studio boasts an impressive five-driver setup: a downward-firing 5.25-inch woofer for bass, three 2-inch midrange speakers (positioned left, right, and upward for directional sound), and a 1-inch tweeter front-firing ^[40]. It’s backed by a 330W amplifier pushing those drivers ^[41]. The Studio similarly can calibrate to the room (it emits test tones on first setup to tune its output) and supports Dolby Atmos and 360 Reality Audio when used with Amazon Music HD for spatial audio content ^[42]. In terms of raw bass and volume, Echo Studio has an edge; users describe its sound as powerful and expansive, if sometimes a bit boomy. In fact, Amazon issued a late-2022 firmware update to improve the Studio’s stereo imaging and tighten its bass response ^[43]. The result, by most accounts, made the Echo Studio a better music speaker, though some audiophiles still find the midrange and treble not as refined as high-end non-smart speakers ^[44]. What Hi-Fi noted that the Studio produced an “open, airy presentation” but they “weren’t convinced” by its bass quality until that update addressed some issues ^[45].

For Google, the current flagship speaker is the Nest Audio, launched in 2020. It’s a more compact device (about 6.9 inches high, 2.6 lbs) with a 75 mm woofer and 19 mm tweeter inside – enough for casual listening, but not on par with HomePod or Echo Studio in sheer audio output. Google did have the older Google Home Max (2017) which was a large stereo speaker with two woofers; it was discontinued and not replaced, leaving a gap in Google’s lineup for audio enthusiasts. The upcoming Gemini-powered Nest speaker might fill that void: rumor has it this new model will be a sort of “Nest Audio 2” that’s larger and more premium than the $99 Nest Audio. According to leaks, this new Google speaker will not only integrate the Gemini AI but also be capable of pairing with a TV (running Google TV) to act as a wireless soundbar for spatial audio ^[46]. That hints it will have beefed-up speakers to handle movie sound. If true, Google is essentially emulating Apple’s idea of using HomePods as TV speakers (Apple allows pairing two HomePods with Apple TV 4K for home theater sound). So, we expect Google’s new speaker to come with at least a stereo pair of drivers or a subwoofer for bass – details to be confirmed at launch.

Sonos deserves a mention in sound quality discussions. While not an in-house voice assistant platform (Sonos supports Alexa and has its own limited voice commands), the Sonos Era 300 and Era 100 (launched 2023) are notable “smart” speakers with excellent sound. The Era 300 in particular is designed for spatial audio and contains six drivers, each angled for room-filling surround sound. In a direct comparison: “The Sonos Era 300 is the priciest… delivers exceptional sound quality with a wide soundstage producing crystal-clear audio even at high volumes. It even has Dolby Atmos support…”, whereas “The Apple HomePod… offers a more even sound profile and can produce more profound bass” ^{[47] [48]}. Meanwhile, “the Amazon Echo Studio is an affordable speaker that offers exceptional sound quality… a wide soundstage and clear, detailed audio, though it may not be as impressive as the Sonos in Atmos performance” ^[49]. This aligns with general consensus: HomePod’s sound is impressively balanced and rich for its size, often described as neutral and “clinical” by audiophiles (sometimes to a fault, as it doesn’t overly color the music) ^[50]. The Sonos Era 300 can outshine it in surround effects due to its multi-driver array, but interestingly the HomePod’s bass depth is noted to be superior in that Stuff review ^[51]. The Echo Studio is the value pick – lots of loud, immersive sound for the money – though perhaps a notch below in finesse.

In everyday terms, if music quality is your top priority and you’re already invested in Apple’s ecosystem (or willing to be), the HomePod 2/3 is likely to please your ears the most for single-speaker listening. If you want true stereo separation, you’ll need two HomePods (which doubles the cost to $600) or two Sonos speakers, etc. Alexa users can stereo-pair two Echo Studios as well. Sonos, being Sonos, supports pairing and adding a subwoofer but that again escalates cost. At the budget end, smaller speakers (HomePod mini, Echo Dot, Nest Mini) are more for voice and background music – none will amaze for sound quality, though the HomePod mini is surprisingly good for its tiny size. The HomePod mini 2 on the horizon could bring improvements, but likely incremental (the original mini already uses a full-range driver and two passive radiators).

Bottom line: Apple, Amazon, and Google now all offer some form of spatial audio or room-tuning technology in their speakers, and they all support multi-room audio (e.g., AirPlay 2 groups for HomePod, Alexa Multi-Room Music, Google Cast groups). Apple’s HomePods are a bit unique in doubling as TV speakers with Apple TV and offering a spatial audio experience that some compare to entry-level soundbars. Amazon is moving that way with the new Fire TV + Echo Studio integrations, and Google’s next speaker aims to do similarly with Google TV ^[52]. So the gap in sound quality is closing as everyone improves, but if you prize audio fidelity, Apple’s and Sonos’s focus on acoustic engineering still stands out. As What Hi-Fi? remarked when HomePod 2 debuted: the original HomePod was a “five-star performer” and its removal from market left a void that the Echo Studio only partly filled ^[53]. With HomePod’s comeback, Apple is vying to reclaim the “best-sounding smart speaker” crown – and with the added twist of a screen in the HomePod 3, it’s bringing that sound prowess into a new form factor.

Smart Assistant Capabilities: Siri, Alexa, or Google?

The brains behind these speakers are their voice assistants – Siri vs. Alexa vs. Google Assistant (Gemini) – and here the differences become pronounced. Historically, Siri has been seen as the weakest of the big three in AI smarts and flexibility. Apple designed Siri to prioritize privacy and do a limited set of tasks well, but it hasn’t been as good at the open-ended Q&A or conversational tricks that Alexa and Google excel at. Indeed, when the original HomePod launched, Siri famously fared poorly against Alexa and Google Assistant, and reviewers slammed how tightly it was locked into Apple’s own apps ^[54]. Siri couldn’t do things like order pizza or play trivia games (no third-party “skills” support like Alexa), and it struggled with answering general knowledge questions that Google’s Assistant handled with ease. Fast-forward to 2023/2024, Siri on HomePod 2 is faster and more reliable than before (Apple improved its recognition and response speed ^[55]), but functionally it’s similar to the old Siri. As one review put it, “Siri is still the same… it won’t respond to requests any differently”, just quicker ^[56]. That’s set to change with Apple’s upcoming AI overhaul:

Siri 2.0 (Apple Intelligence): Apple has been quietly working on a next-generation Siri, often referred to as using “Apple Intelligence” (an internal umbrella for its AI efforts). Reports indicate this revamped Siri will leverage more advanced AI language models (possibly even incorporating some elements of AI like the LLM behind ChatGPT or Google’s Gemini) ^[57]. The HomePod 3’s delay into 2025 is largely attributed to Siri 2.0 not being ready for primetime ^[58]. Apple wants the HomePod 3’s marquee feature to be a truly smarter Siri, one that can handle multi-step commands and engage in more natural dialogue. For instance, you might ask Siri 2.0, “I’m having friends over Friday – suggest a playlist and set the living room lights and thermostat for when they arrive,” and the assistant could theoretically reason through that. There’s talk that this Siri update will debut with iOS 19 and the new HomePod, aligning with late 2025 ^[59]. We’ve also seen hints in iOS betas – e.g., code in tvOS 17.4 referenced a new device “AudioAccessory6” believed to be the HomePod with screen, and possibly new Siri interface elements ^[60]. Another clue: Apple reportedly let select employees take home prototype units of the Siri-powered home hub to test in real-world settings ^[61]. All this suggests Apple is serious about catching up. However, until it launches, Siri remains the limiting factor on HomePods. It handles HomeKit commands well (“Hey Siri, unlock the front door” or “set the thermostat to 72” etc.), it’s fine for basics like timers, reminders, messages, and it can distinguish up to 6 users’ voices to personalize responses (e.g., only read your texts to you) ^[62]. But ask a HomePod something like “Who won the Best Actor Oscar in 1994?” or “Tell me a joke” and Siri’s knowledge graph and personality still feel less robust than the competition.

Alexa (Amazon): Alexa set the benchmark early on for what a smart speaker AI should do. It has over 100,000 “skills” (third-party voice apps) that let it play games, answer trivia, control specific gadgets, order food, etc. Amazon’s strength is in this ecosystem of skills and its integration with Amazon’s services (shopping lists, Prime music/video, Audible audiobooks, etc.). Over the years Alexa has gotten more conversational – you don’t always have to say “Alexa” for follow-up questions thanks to the follow-up mode, and it added things like Alexa Guard (listening for break-ins or alarms when you’re away). However, Alexa was starting to feel a bit stagnant by 2023, with reports Amazon was seeing reduced usage of voice beyond basic tasks. Enter Alexa+ in 2025: Amazon’s big upgrade infused Alexa with a large language model (LLM) akin to ChatGPT. Alexa+ is described as “highly personalized” and able to handle complex, multi-turn conversations ^[63]. At Amazon’s February 2025 Devices event, Alexa+ was demoed doing things like making a restaurant reservation via OpenTable, booking an Uber, and coordinating that with texting a friend – all from one voice request ^[64]. It can chain multiple services and actions together intelligently. This is a huge leap beyond the old Alexa, which often required very specific phrasing and could only do one skill at a time. Alexa+ can also tap into real-time knowledge via partnerships (Amazon mentioned integration of data from sources like AP, Reuters, etc., to give up-to-date info) ^[65].

One catch: Alexa+ is effectively a paid service (unlike old Alexa). It costs $19.99/month, but Amazon is giving it free to all Prime members ^[66]. Considering Prime’s massive user base, many Echo owners will get it “free,” but non-Prime users face a subscription. Alexa+ is rolling out first to Echo devices with screens (Echo Show 8, 10, 15, 21) in late 2025 ^{[67] [68]}, with others to follow. This staged rollout suggests that the full Alexa+ experience might be best with visual responses (for example, if you ask it to plan a weekend trip, it might show an itinerary or maps on a screen). However, Amazon says eventually most Echos will get the upgraded brains. It’s noteworthy that Amazon removed the previous option for fully local voice processing – all Alexa+ queries are cloud-processed and even standard Alexa is now sending more data to the cloud since March 2025 ^[69]. This raised some privacy eyebrows, but Amazon’s rationale is that cloud AI is needed for the smarter features. From a capability standpoint, Alexa remains extremely capable: it’s great with smart home control (deep integration with a huge range of devices), it can do natural things like “Alexa, announce dinner’s ready” to broadcast messages, or “Alexa, remind me to take out the trash on Sundays.” With Alexa+, it will be able to handle far more contextual follow-ups and even proactively suggest things.

Google Assistant (Gemini): Google Assistant used to be considered the smartest voice AI, especially for general knowledge queries. It leverages Google’s search and knowledge graph, so if you ask “What’s the tallest mountain in Europe?” or “How do you say ‘good night’ in Japanese?”, Google Assistant typically outperforms Alexa or Siri in accuracy. It’s also tightly integrated with Android/Google services – it can read your Gmail for flight info, add events to Calendar, navigate via Google Maps, etc. Where Google fell short was in third-party device support (not as many “actions” as Alexa’s skills, though most major smart home brands work with Google too) and in personality – it’s competent but maybe less quirky/fun than Alexa. By 2025, however, Google Assistant was starting to show its age. In fact, Google publicly apologized for Assistant’s performance issues, particularly on the Google Home hardware side ^[70]. Users had been complaining about buggy behavior and neglected hardware (the original Google Home speakers from 2016 even had a firmware glitch that broke some devices – leading to a bit of a “speaker debacle” and talk of a lawsuit ^{[71] [72]}). Google’s solution is bold: they are replacing Google Assistant with a new AI called “Gemini for Home.” Announced at I/O 2025, Gemini is Google’s next-gen conversational AI (the same project powering their ChatGPT competitor in search and Android). On speakers and displays, Gemini will fully take over from Assistant as of October 2025 ^{[73] [74]}. It’s described as allowing much more seamless, natural conversations – you won’t have to use rigid commands, and it can handle multi-step requests. Google gave examples of Gemini being able to set up devices with voice instructions and handle complex smart home routines just from a casual description ^[75]. Essentially, it’s Google’s answer to Alexa+ (and Apple’s Siri 2.0). They’re even launching a paid tier for Gemini, hinting that some advanced features might require a subscription (similar to Alexa+) ^[76]. At launch, though, it seems core functionality will be free on existing Nest hardware, and users can opt-in starting Oct 1.

One really interesting tidbit: there’s speculation (and it was even reported in Tom’s Guide) that Apple might collaborate with Google’s Gemini for Siri 2.0 ^[77]. If true, that would be a twist – Apple generally prefers in-house solutions, but Siri’s team has struggled, and Google’s AI might help fill gaps. Nothing confirmed there, but it shows how central these new AI models have become, even crossing company lines.

Day-to-day use cases: How do these assistants stack up in normal usage in 2025? If you’re asking for general knowledge or directions, Google (Gemini) likely remains top dog – it’s literally drawing on Google Search. Alexa is no slouch but sometimes says “Hmm, I’m not sure” for things Google can answer. Siri historically was the worst at answering random facts (often just “I found this on the web…” and then you have to check your iPhone), but with Siri 2.0 Apple may include a large language model that can generate answers on the fly, which could vastly improve Siri’s usefulness beyond the Apple garden. For smart home commands, all three now support natural phrasing like “turn off the lights in the kitchen” or “set the thermostat to 22 degrees.” Alexa and Google have had a bit of an edge in letting you create routines by voice (“when I say good morning, open the blinds and start the coffee”), whereas HomeKit routines typically have to be configured in the app (though you can trigger them with Siri). With the new AI push, expect more conversational setup: e.g., Gemini might let you say “ set up a routine for movie night” and it will ask follow-up questions to configure it. Alexa+ similarly is aimed at handling “agentic” tasks without you scripting them step by step ^[78].

For communication, Alexa and Google both support features like broadcasting messages to all speakers, making voice calls (Alexa can call phones or other Echos; Google can call numbers or other Nests with Duo/Meet). Apple’s HomePod allows iPhone call handoff and using it as a speakerphone, and you can use Intercom to send voice messages between HomePods or to family iOS devices. All three can send voice notes and set reminders, etc., but only Siri can send iMessages, and only Google Assistant can send a WhatsApp or SMS on Android, etc. Each works best within its own ecosystem there.

One area to highlight: Multilingual and voice recognition. Google Assistant has been very strong in multilingual households – it can understand two languages at once (you can speak in English or Spanish interchangeably, for example). Alexa recently started adding multilingual mode as well. Siri is a bit behind here (you have to switch its language manually if you want to talk in another language). On voice profiles, all three can recognize different users by voice to personalize responses (like giving your calendar if it’s you, or your spouse’s calendar when they ask). Apple added multi-user support to HomePod later than Amazon/Google, but it’s there now (up to 6 users) ^[79].

Privacy and data: Apple touts that Siri requests are tied to a random identifier, not your Apple ID, and processed “on device or with minimal logging” – but the new Siri 2.0’s reliance on AI models might require more cloud processing. We’ll see if Apple can do any on-device AI (maybe leveraging their powerful Neural Engine hardware). Amazon and Google both rely on cloud processing for the heavy AI, which means more data on their servers. Amazon’s aforementioned change to Alexa privacy (no more fully local option) drew some negative press ^[80]. Google, after some scandals years back (remember when it came out that human reviewers were listening to some Assistant recordings), has also tried to reassure users – you can now review and delete your Assistant voice recordings if you want. Apple by default doesn’t store your HomePod audio unless you opt in to “Improve Siri” (and even then it anonymizes).

In summary, by late 2025 we’re looking at a new generation of smarter, AI-driven assistants: Siri 2.0, Alexa+, and Google Gemini. They all promise more conversational abilities and better understanding of context. The race is on: Amazon’s Panos Panay (Head of Devices) said of Alexa+, “I think you’re going to love it… when you use Alexa+, you’re going to feel it”, highlighting Amazon’s focus on making Alexa more proactive and personalized ^[81]. Google’s approach is to literally replace the old assistant entirely, signaling a big leap. Apple is a bit later to the party but could surprise us with how deeply it integrates AI across its devices (Siri 2.0 might work in tandem with your iPhone or Vision Pro headset, etc., since Apple controls a whole ecosystem).

At present, if you want the most capable assistant immediately, Amazon Alexa still offers the widest range of skills and device compatibility, and Google Assistant the deepest general knowledge. Siri is the most limited outside of Apple-specific use (controlling your iPhone or HomeKit). But this calculus could change drastically once the AI upgrades roll out – we’ll be watching closely to see if Siri 2.0 can finally stand toe-to-toe with the others, and whether Alexa+ and Gemini truly transform the user experience or just add bells and whistles.

Smart Home Integration and Ecosystems

Beyond music and voice queries, a major role of these speakers is acting as a smart home hub – letting you control lights, thermostats, locks, cameras, and more with your voice or automations. Each company has its own smart home ecosystem: Apple HomeKit, Amazon Alexa (Smart Home), and Google Home (Nest). The good news is, thanks to industry standards like Matter and Thread, these ecosystems are slowly becoming more interoperable – but there are still key differences.

Apple HomeKit (via HomePod): HomeKit is Apple’s smart home framework, and the HomePod (along with Apple TV or iPad) can serve as a home hub that bridges your devices for remote access and automation. HomeKit historically had a reputation for being more secure and private, but also more limited in device selection. All HomeKit accessories must be certified by Apple, which meant fewer options (especially in earlier years) and often higher prices. By 2025, this gap has narrowed a bit due to the arrival of Matter – Apple was a big proponent of Matter, which launched in late 2022 as a unifying standard. The HomePod 2 and mini received updates to support Matter and also include Thread radios ^{[82] [83]}. Thread is a low-power mesh networking protocol (great for connecting battery-powered sensors, etc.) and is part of the Matter standard. The HomePod mini was actually one of the first consumer devices with Thread, and the HomePod 2 followed suit ^[84]. This means a HomePod can act as a Thread border router – essentially, it can communicate with Thread smart devices (like some smart plugs, sensors, and bulbs from Eve or Nanoleaf) and relay their data to your Wi-Fi network/HomeKit.

With Matter, many new accessories are multi-platform. For example, a Matter-enabled smart bulb can be added to Apple Home, Alexa, or Google Home – or even all three at once – and controlled from any. So, if you buy devices that support Matter, the ecosystem lock-in is less of an issue. Apple’s Home app can now control Matter devices from various brands, not just HomeKit-specific ones.

However, there are still HomeKit-only or non-Matter things. HomeKit has some unique device categories (like HomeKit Secure Video for cameras, which uses iCloud) and requires an iPhone/iPad or Mac to configure everything. HomePod’s integration is very smooth if you’re all-in on Apple: you can ask Siri to control any HomeKit device by name (“Hey Siri, open the garage” etc.), and automation scenes set up in the Home app can be triggered by Siri or scheduled. HomePod also enables features like Intercom (voice messages to other HomePods or devices) and using Shortcuts via Siri. But if someone in the household uses Android, they cannot directly interact with HomeKit devices – there’s no Home app for Android. The only workaround is using the device’s own app or Matter multi-admin to connect the device to both ecosystems (which Matter does allow in some cases). In short, Apple’s ecosystem integration is fantastic if you live in Apple’s world, and nearly nonexistent if you don’t. As Wired put it, the HomePod doesn’t have “anywhere near the level of third-party smart home support” outside Apple’s sphere ^[85]. You can’t, for instance, integrate HomePod with Google Nest cameras or Amazon Ring doorbells in any direct way (though Apple’s HomeKit does support some cameras from Logitech, Eufy, etc., or you view others via their apps on an iPhone).

Amazon Alexa Smart Home: Amazon arguably has the broadest device compatibility. If you see a gadget with “Works with Alexa” on the box, it will likely be straightforward to add it in the Alexa app. Alexa supports not only Wi-Fi devices but also has Zigbee support on many Echo models. In fact, the Echo (4th Gen), Echo Studio, Echo Show 10 (3rd Gen), and the new Echo Hub all have a built-in Zigbee hub radio ^[86]. This means those Echos can directly connect to Zigbee-based devices like Philips Hue bulbs (without needing the Hue Bridge), smart locks from Yale/Schlage, motion sensors, etc. Alexa also supports Bluetooth for connecting to some smart home devices (like certain locks or plugs). And of course, now Alexa supports Matter too – Amazon updated many Echo models (4th-gen and later, plus Echo Dots 3rd-gen and later, and Echo Show models) to be Matter controllers. Some Echos with Thread radio (Echo 4th gen, Echo Hub, etc.) even act as Thread border routers ^[87].

What this means practically: if you have an Echo speaker, it can be the one-stop hub to connect devices from many manufacturers. Alexa’s app allows creating routines that mix and match devices – e.g., “When Ring doorbell pressed, if it’s after sunset, turn on Philips Hue porch light and announce ‘someone’s at the door’ on Echo.” Because Amazon also owns Ring, Eero, and has partnerships with many, Alexa integration tends to be very rich (you can even have Alexa answer the door through a Ring Doorbell Pro’s speaker with certain Alexa Greetings features).

Alexa’s ecosystem extends to things like Alexa Guard (using the Echo’s mics as security sensors for breaking glass or smoke alarms). Interestingly, Apple is copying that – HomePod got a similar Sound Recognition feature for alarms ^[88], and Google’s new speaker is said to detect unusual sounds too ^[89]. Alexa also has Hunches (if Alexa thinks you’ve gone to bed and a smart light is still on, it can suggest turning it off, or even do it automatically). Alexa can even control certain car functions (with connected car skills) or talk to your Fire TV to play shows, etc.

One might argue Alexa’s ecosystem is the most agnostic – you can use Alexa from an iPhone or Android (just install the Alexa app), and many third-party devices like Sonos speakers or Fitbit wearables have Alexa built-in. Amazon wants Alexa everywhere, so they integrated it into microwaves, TVs, cars, etc. This ubiquity is a strength, though it also led to some fragmentation in user experience. But if we focus on the smart speaker as a hub: an Echo can tie together an Alexa-centric smart home with ease.

Google Home/Nest Ecosystem: Google’s approach with Nest devices is somewhat between Apple and Amazon. It doesn’t have the sheer number of third-party “skills” as Alexa, but Google Assistant can interface with most major smart home brands too (“Works with Hey Google” is the badge). Google relies on the Google Home app (Android/iOS) to add devices and set up routines. They support Matter as well, and Google was also early to adopt Thread – for instance, the Nest Hub (2nd gen) and Nest Wifi routers have Thread border router capabilities to connect Thread-based accessories ^[90]. Google doesn’t have Zigbee radios in their speakers, so any Zigbee devices must either be Matter-compatible or use their own bridges.

One of Google’s unique strengths is its integration with its own products like Nest Thermostat, Nest Protect (smoke alarm), Nest Cam, Nest Doorbell. If you have those, a Nest display like the Nest Hub Max becomes a central monitor – e.g., it can show your camera feeds and even use the display as a Nest Cam (the Hub Max’s camera can function as an indoor security cam when you’re away). Alexa can do similar (Echo Show can show Ring or Blink cameras), but those are separate brands Amazon acquired; Google’s end-to-end tends to be a bit more unified. With the upcoming Gemini update, Google Home is also getting a revamp to be more proactive. Google demonstrated integration like: you could say “Goodnight Google” and if a smart door wasn’t locked, the assistant might respond asking if you want it locked (similar to Alexa’s Hunches, yes). Google also emphasizes routines that involve Assistant interacting with your phone – for example, you could say “Hey Google, I’m heading to the airport” and it could turn off your lights, adjust thermostat, then continue on your phone to pull up navigation in Maps.

Ecosystem Lock-in and Compatibility: The three ecosystems typically don’t talk to each other. You can’t directly control an Alexa-only device with Google Assistant or vice versa, unless it’s via Matter or a middle-man like IFTTT or Home Assistant. Matter is solving a lot of this by letting devices be controlled by multiple ecosystems simultaneously: it has a concept of Multi-Admin, which means, for instance, you could add a Matter smart plug to Apple Home and also to Alexa. Then both Siri and Alexa can control it (just not literally at the same exact time). In practice, multi-admin is still new and sometimes finicky, but it’s a promising direction.

One lingering lock-in: media and services. Apple’s HomePod is tied to Apple Music by default. As Marques Brownlee (MKBHD) lamented, you “can’t set Spotify as default” on HomePod, which for him made the product frustrating despite its great hardware ^[91]. Amazon and Google allow third-party music services – e.g., you can set Spotify or Apple Music as your default on Echo or Nest speakers. Likewise, Alexa will use Amazon’s services preferentially (Prime Music if you have it, Amazon Video on Fire TV if asked), but gives options. Google of course pushes YouTube Music by default now, but also supports Spotify, Pandora, etc. For calendars, Apple HomePod will only work with Apple Calendar and Reminders for voice scheduling; Alexa works with Google, Microsoft calendars if linked; Google Assistant works with Google Calendar (naturally) and you can link others via Assistant settings. So in terms of cross-service compatibility, Alexa and Google are more flexible. Apple expects you to be using Apple services for a seamless experience (and many Siri capabilities simply won’t function if you aren’t, or at least they’ll be very limited).

Third-Party integrations: Alexa’s skill ecosystem means you can do things like call an Uber or Domino’s Pizza via voice, use third-party quiz skills, etc. Many of those skills, truth be told, are gimmicky or not heavily used. Google had a platform for third-party Assistant “actions” but it was not as popular, and in 2023 Google actually shut down the conversational Actions for third parties, refocusing on Android app integration and the new AI route. Siri has Shortcuts, which power users can set up to do advanced tasks (even integrate non-Apple apps), but you have to configure those – Siri doesn’t have the open marketplace of skills. With Siri 2.0, Apple might allow more natural language triggers for Shortcuts or intelligent suggestions.

Home security and reliability: All three companies want you to trust their devices as a reliable home hub. Apple’s HomeKit requires end-to-end encryption for cameras and such, which is great for privacy. Alexa and Google have encryption too, but historically HomeKit was considered the most locked-down (to the point that some device makers complained it was too strict). A concrete example: HomeKit Secure Video will encrypt your security camera footage and store it in iCloud, and not even Apple can see it. Alexa and Google also offer cloud storage for cameras (Ring, Nest Aware subscriptions), but encryption keys are managed by the companies. Depending on your comfort level, that might or might not matter.

Automation: Creating smart home routines is a bit more user-friendly now across platforms. Alexa’s routine interface is quite powerful (triggers can be a time, a voice phrase, a sensor detection, etc., and actions can be multi-step). Google Home’s app has “household routines” and is improving – they recently added a script editor for advanced users as well. Apple’s Home app has “Automations” which cover similar ground (including using HomePod’s onboard sensors like its temperature/humidity sensor to trigger things – a new feature in HomePod 2 ^[92]). So whichever ecosystem, you can likely set up, say, an evening routine to dim lights and play music. Alexa and Google also integrate with IFTTT for even more complex cross-service automation (Apple dropped IFTTT integration early on and doesn’t allow Siri triggers from IFTTT).

Multi-ecosystem households: Interestingly, you can use multiple ecosystems in one home. Some people have Alexa for certain things and Siri for others – devices like Philips Hue, Lutron, Ecobee, Nanoleaf etc. often support HomeKit, Alexa, and Google all at once. So you could control the same light via Siri on a HomePod or Alexa on an Echo. This isn’t as crazy as it sounds: families sometimes have an Echo Dot in one room and a HomePod in another. The downside is managing two apps/platforms and remembering which trigger word to use where. Matter aims to unify this so you might just use whichever speaker is nearest. We’re not fully there yet, but progress is steady.

In conclusion, Amazon’s Alexa ecosystem offers the widest compatibility and has features like built-in Zigbee hubs and a huge library of integrations, making it kind of the “connect everything” choice. Google’s ecosystem is strongest for those already using Google services and it excels in things like pulling together information (traffic, calendar, etc.) in useful ways, plus it offers a clean interface on its smart displays without the ads that Amazon shows ^{[93] [94]}. Apple’s HomeKit+HomePod ecosystem is ideal for privacy-minded users deeply invested in Apple devices, where the tight integration actually makes smart home control feel simpler (you can just talk to your devices and things happen, or use the Apple Home app which is very straightforward). But Apple’s walled garden can feel isolating if you try to venture out – as one reviewer quipped, you could get a full-size Echo or Nest speaker for the price of a HomePod mini, “and you should” ^[95] if you’re not committed to Apple’s ecosystem.

The playing field is levelling somewhat thanks to Matter, meaning the hardware you buy now is more likely to work no matter which assistant you settle on. Still, there’s a very real effect of ecosystem lock-in: each platform rewards you for adding more of its kind (Apple with its seamless device handoff and exclusives like intercom, Amazon with its ever-expanding Alexa skills and Echo gadget family, Google with its tie-ins to Android/Chromecast/Photos etc.). Your choice might ultimately hinge on whose ecosystem you already use – as Wired’s smart home guide suggests, “If you’re a big Google/Android user, adding a Google speaker is a no-brainer… Apple’s is so limited you might choose a different assistant even if you use iPhone, while Alexa has the widest range” ^{[96] [97]}.

Connectivity, Compatibility, and Lock-In

This aspect dives a bit deeper into the technical and platform compatibility issues, some of which we touched on above. When we say “connectivity,” we mean both the connectivity options of the speakers themselves (Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, etc.) and how they connect with other devices or services. Compatibility overlaps with ecosystem support (which devices/services work with which speaker). Lock-in refers to how tied you become to one ecosystem once you invest.

Device Connectivity (Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, Ports): All three flagship speakers (HomePod, Echo, Nest) are Wi-Fi based and require a home Wi-Fi network. Notably:

• Apple’s HomePods have Wi-Fi (802.11ac) and support AirPlay 2 for multi-room, but no Bluetooth audio streaming support for input. You cannot, for example, pair a phone over Bluetooth to play music on a HomePod. It’s AirPlay or nothing (AirPlay itself uses Wi-Fi). HomePod also has no auxiliary jack. This is a deliberate choice by Apple to keep it within their ecosystem and ensure higher quality audio (AirPlay transmits lossless audio whereas Bluetooth would be compressed). But it means you can’t easily use a HomePod as a speaker for, say, a non-Apple device. (One minor exception: you can use AirPlay from iTunes on a Windows PC, but that’s still Apple’s protocol).
• Amazon’s Echo devices do support Bluetooth audio input and output. For example, you can pair your phone to an Echo and use it as a regular Bluetooth speaker. Many Echo models (Dot, Echo, Studio) also have a 3.5mm audio jack – on the Echo and Dot, it can be used as audio out (to connect to better speakers), and on some like Echo Input or older Echo Plus, it was also an input. The Echo Studio interestingly has a combination mini-Toslink/3.5mm port that can function as a line-in or optical input (so you could plug a CD player or use as TV sound via optical). This gives Echo an edge in flexibility – you can incorporate it into other audio setups.
• Google’s Nest Audio has no aux jack, but the Nest Hub Max has a USB-C port (primarily for charging other devices, not audio). Google speakers do allow Bluetooth input as well, so you can pair a phone to a Nest Audio for example. However, they lack audio out jacks (Google had the Chromecast Audio dongle for that purpose earlier, but discontinued it).
• Thread & Zigbee & Radios: We’ve discussed Thread (HomePod, Nest, Echo all have some models with it) and Zigbee (Echo). One more connectivity protocol: Ultrawideband (UWB) – Apple’s HomePod 2 has the U1 chip which allows iPhones with U1 to do neat things like hand off music by bringing the phone near the HomePod, or show a now playing preview when you approach ^[98]. This is a unique Apple touch; neither Echo nor Nest uses UWB. It’s more a convenience feature than core connectivity, but it ties into that Apple magic of devices knowing when they’re close.
• Handoff and Multi-Device: Apple’s continuity means if you’re listening to music on your iPhone, you can tap it to HomePod to transfer the audio ^[99]. Alexa and Google can’t do that exactly, but they each have their version: Alexa has “Alexa Cast” for Amazon Music and YouTube Music has a casting to Google speakers. But those are app-specific. Apple’s works with any audio via AirPlay handoff.
• Inter-connectivity: HomePod cannot directly interact with an Echo or Google speaker on a network; they’re separate islands (aside from Matter device sharing as discussed). Alexa and Google don’t talk to each other either. So if by connectivity we mean “can I send audio from a HomePod to an Echo” – no, that’s not possible. If you have multiple of the same brand, they connect: two HomePods can stereo pair (but interestingly only two of the same model can pair; you can’t stereo pair a HomePod 2 with a HomePod 1 or mini). Amazon allows mixing some speakers in groups but for true stereo pairing, it also requires identical models (two Echo Studios or two Echo Dots, etc.). Google similarly allows pairing two of the same (two Nest Audios, for example).

Service Compatibility: We covered music services, but here’s a quick summary:

• HomePod: Native voice control for Apple Music, Apple Podcasts, iHeartRadio, TuneIn, and (recently) some third-party music like Pandora and Deezer gained Siri support. Spotify is notably not supported via Siri (not due to technical impossibility – Spotify just hasn’t integrated with SiriKit on HomePod, likely due to business reasons). You can still AirPlay Spotify from your phone to HomePod, but you can’t just ask Siri to play Spotify tracks ^[100]. This is a pain point for many. In contrast, Alexa and Google both support Spotify Premium and Free by voice.
• Alexa: Supports Amazon Music, Spotify, Apple Music, Pandora, iHeart, SiriusXM, Tidal, Deezer, etc. You can set defaults in the Alexa app.
• Google: Supports YouTube Music, Spotify, Apple Music (as of 2020, Google Assistant gained Apple Music support too), Pandora, Deezer.
• Voice calls/messaging: Apple’s HomePod can use iMessage/FaceTime audio to other Apple devices (if your iPhone is nearby or on the same network essentially). Alexa can call phone numbers in some countries and also device-to-device calls (drop in, etc.). Google can call numbers via Google Duo/Meet or through your linked phone plan on some Android devices. But none of them interoperate (can’t make Alexa call a Google Home, etc.).
• Smart home device cross-compatibility: Because of fragmentation, some devices are exclusive. For example, Nest thermostats and cameras are not HomeKit compatible (unless you use a third-party bridge like Starling Home Hub). They work with Google and Alexa (Alexa can display Nest Cam feeds on an Echo Show, and Alexa can even change Nest Thermostat temp if linked). Apple users are left out unless they add a plugin. Conversely, Ring cameras don’t work with Google or HomeKit officially (Ring is Amazon-owned, works with Alexa excellently, but Google Assistant only offers very limited Ring integration). So if you pick HomePod as your main speaker and you have Ring doorbells, you can’t ask Siri to show you the doorbell (no HomeKit support); you’d have to grab your phone. These are the types of ecosystem lock-ins that persist.
• Voice Assistant on other devices: Alexa is available on third-party speakers (e.g., the Sonos One and Era have Alexa built-in, as does that JBL Authentics 200 which interestingly can run Alexa and Google Assistant simultaneously ^[101]). Google Assistant also appears on some third-party devices (though Google started to restrict that a bit). Siri, on the other hand, is only on Apple devices; no third-party speaker has Siri. So if you invest in HomeKit and Siri, you are limited to HomePods or using your iPhone/Apple Watch to talk to Siri. Alexa and Google are more ubiquitous (TVs, soundbars, appliances sometimes have them).
• APIs and Extensions: Amazon and Google offer developers APIs to integrate their products (Alexa Skills Kit, Google Assistant SDK). Apple’s HomeKit has an API too, but Siri itself not really open to third parties beyond certain domains via SiriKit Intents (which mostly apply to iPhone apps). This is why you see so many quirky Alexa Skills (even from smaller companies or enthusiasts), but almost no such thing for Siri. Apple curates the experience much more.

Lock-In Effects: Once you start buying a bunch of smart devices, switching ecosystems can be painful. If you have 20 Alexa-connected devices and routines set up, moving to Google Home means re-adding all those devices in Google’s app (assuming they’re supported at all) and recreating routines. Manufacturers are addressing this by making devices multi-platform. For instance, modern Philips Hue bulbs can be controlled by Alexa, Google, or Siri (HomeKit) – you can connect Hue to all three simultaneously. If all your devices are that way, you could theoretically use whichever speaker you feel like at the moment. But practically, people tend to stick to one for consistency (“which voice phrase do I use, again?” confusion otherwise).

One subtle lock-in is cloud services: If you’ve invested in Alexa Guard Plus (Alexa’s subscription security service) or Google’s Nest Aware (for cameras) or Apple’s iCloud+ (for HomeKit Secure Video), those might keep you tied to that platform’s speakers to utilize fully. Apple’s HomeKit Secure Video requires a HomeHub (HomePod/Apple TV) – if you drop HomePod for an Echo, your cameras would lose that functionality.

Another lock-in: voice profiles and personalization. Alexa and Google each build a voice profile for you over time (Nick’s voice = Nick’s Spotify, calendars, etc.). Siri on HomePod does similarly with voice recognition. If you switch to a new ecosystem, it starts from scratch learning your voice and preferences (not a huge deal, but something to note).

From a hardware perspective, you might also consider longevity: Apple tends to support devices for many years with software. The original HomePod got about 5 years of updates before being discontinued, and even after discontinuation Apple still gave it updates for a while. Amazon and Google have not bricked any old devices yet either (there are first-gen Echos from 2014 still working ^[102], and Google’s original Home speaker from 2016 still works, though Google recently ended software updates for it). If one worries about “will these be paperweights in 10 years?”, all have some uncertainty, but at least Apple and Google now have to comply with certain regulations (e.g., a UK law requiring manufacturers to disclose how long they’ll provide support) ^[103].

Summing up lock-in: If you choose HomePod, you’re effectively choosing to center your smart home on Apple’s Home app and Siri. That brings great integration with Apple devices (ask Siri on HomePod to find your iPhone – it’ll ping it; or use HomePod to trigger shortcuts on your phone, etc.), but it limits you to accessories that play nice with HomeKit/Matter. Choosing Alexa as your main platform gives you arguably the widest compatibility – you’ll rarely find a device that can’t work with Alexa in some way – and platform-agnostic access (Android or iOS, doesn’t matter). But you then rely on Amazon’s ecosystem and might find yourself buying more Amazon gear (Ring doorbells, Echo displays for each room, Eero routers, etc.) because they integrate so well. With Google, you get the advantage if you’re an Android/Google services user. Each tends to “lock you in” by convenience: it’s just easiest to stay with the one you started with, especially as you automate more routines and add more devices.

Finally, note that HomePod 3’s introduction of a screen might bring it closer to Alexa and Google’s style of interaction (touch + visuals + voice). This could reduce lock-in for some tasks – e.g., the HomePod 3 might have a web browser (it’s rumored to run a variant of iPadOS with apps like Safari, Music, Notes, etc., but no App Store ^[104]). If true, that’s a very interesting development: a HomePod that can do some tablet-like functions. It blurs the line with an iPad dock. If it has a browser, technically you could access Google services or even Alexa web interfaces on it, though that’s speculative. Conversely, Amazon’s Echo Show and Google’s Nest Hub have had screens that show information – and Amazon even let you install some visual Alexa skills or shortcuts. Apple entering that fray could either be a brilliant bridging of their ecosystem (an Apple smart display) or, if they keep it closed, just another lock-in to Apple’s way of doing things (only Apple-approved apps on that screen, etc.). Given Apple’s history, it will likely be the latter – a very curated experience focusing on HomeKit controls, FaceTime, and a few apps.

In conclusion, connectivity and compatibility are areas where Apple has historically lagged (fewer inputs/outputs, no Bluetooth, limited service compatibility) while Amazon has been the most flexible and Google somewhat in between. As the smart home gets more standardized, it’s easier than ever to mix and match, but the user experience is still best if you commit to one ecosystem’s workflow. So choosing HomePod vs Echo vs Nest is not just a hardware choice, but a platform choice. Many reviewers advise to “pick your voice assistant first, then the speaker” – meaning if you prefer Alexa’s capabilities or Google’s, get those speakers, because the hardware alone won’t overcome ecosystem limitations.

Design and Build Quality

Each of these smart speakers also takes a different approach in physical design, aesthetics, and build quality, reflecting the brand’s philosophy and target use.

HomePod (Apple): Apple’s design language for HomePod has been about blending minimalist elegance with acoustic function. The HomePod is a cylinder with a seamless 3D-knit mesh fabric all around. That mesh isn’t just for looks – it’s acoustically transparent and serves to evenly disperse sound. Apple went with a neutral color scheme: White or Midnight (dark gray). It’s meant to fit into a home’s decor without drawing too much attention, almost like a modern sculpture or a fancy vase. The build is solid – it’s a hefty device (2.3 kg) which helps it stay planted even at high volumes. Even the power cable is color-matched and fabric-braided, showing Apple’s attention to detail ^[105]. On top, the HomePod has a circular touch surface with LED backlighting that forms the Siri waveform when you invoke it. This top display on HomePod 2 is an improvement from the original (now it’s an edge-to-edge glow, whereas the first had a smaller disc). It’s still monochromatic and mostly for light feedback, not for content.

The rumored HomePod 3 design will change things significantly by adding a real display. Reports say a 6–7 inch touchscreen, likely OLED for rich colors ^[106]. If it’s like “two iPhones side by side” in size ^[107], that’s roughly akin to an iPad mini screen (which is 8.3 inches, so a bit smaller). This device is said to act as a “command center” for the smart home ^[108], which implies the UI might show a home dashboard, cameras, etc. It might resemble an Echo Show 8 or Nest Hub in functionality, but knowing Apple, the design will be more premium. Gurman says Apple was testing devices with a wall-mount option and a detachable speaker base ^[109]. So we might see a tablet-like screen that docks onto a speaker or into a mount. This could allow the best of both worlds: mount it on the wall in the kitchen for a HomeKit control panel, or attach it to a base on your desk for better sound. It’s a modular approach similar to the Google Pixel Tablet’s dock (where the tablet magnetically attaches to a speaker dock) ^[110]. If true, the HomePod 3 might literally be two components: the display unit with maybe some micro speakers and mics, and an optional larger speaker base providing woofer/tweeters and power. Apple’s patent shows a design that’s like a “pill-shaped” device with a circular cutout – possibly the mount ^[111]. All this points to a device that, in typical Apple fashion, could have a very clean, wireless look (if wall-mounted, just one cord in-wall, etc.). The materials will likely remain fabric and plastic or aluminum where needed. Apple tends to use high-quality plastics; the HomePod’s mesh is soft to touch but durable (just keep it off wooden surfaces without a coaster – the original HomePod infamously left white rings on some oiled wood furniture due to a reaction with its silicone base).

Amazon Echo Design: Amazon has experimented a lot. The current Echo (4th Gen) (the primary mid-size model) is a spherical shape about 5.7” diameter, covered in fabric. It looks like a little orb lamp or a futuristic ball. It has a light ring at the bottom that glows Alexa blue when active. The sphere design was a departure from the earlier cylinder Echo designs. Users generally like that it projects sound 360° well, though some joked it looks like a “small Death Star.” Build-wise, it’s fairly light (just over 900g) and not as premium-feeling as a HomePod, but it doesn’t feel cheap either. Amazon offers multiple colors (charcoal, glacier white, twilight blue, limited editions, etc.), which gives consumers more personalization than Apple’s strict 2-color approach.

The Echo Studio looks more like a brutish version of the HomePod – cylindrical, fabric-coated, but larger and with some design quirks: it has cut-out slots near the base which function as bass ports and give it a distinct silhouette (almost like handles or vents). It also has physical buttons on the top (volume up/down, mic mute, action button). Amazon tends to include such buttons on most Echo devices for quick control and privacy (mute). HomePod instead relies on touch and software for volume, which some prefer aesthetically, but others like having a physical mute button for Alexa and Google (although those physically cut power to mics on Echo, giving assurance of privacy when off).

Echo Show devices, with screens, have different designs: the Show 8/10 are like little tilted displays with a fabric back, the Show 10 even swivels on a motor to face you. The largest, Echo Show 15, is a big flat panel you mount like a picture frame. And now the Echo Show 21 is essentially a small TV. Amazon doesn’t shy away from making its devices visible – e.g., the Show 10’s motion tracking screen is very “techy” looking in a room (some love it, some find it creepy). They even did an Echo with a robot arm (the Astro robot) – not a speaker, but shows Amazon’s experimental nature.

Google Nest Design: Google emphasizes a softer design approach. The Nest Audio is a tall, rounded-rectangle shape (some say it looks like a loaf of bread standing up) with fabric mesh all around the front and sides, and a solid matte plastic back. Colors like Sage (green), Sand (pinkish), Sky (blue), etc., make it fit into home decor nicely. It has touch controls (tap sides for volume, top for play/pause) and hidden LED dots behind the fabric for feedback. It’s minimalist to a fault – some users didn’t even realize it had volume touch zones. Google’s Nest Mini is a tiny puck with similar fabric and a wall-mount hole; also very discrete.

The Nest Hub smart displays (7” and Hub Max 10”) have a distinctive design: a tablet-like screen attached to a fabric-covered base/stand. It looks like a floating tablet on a cloth pillow. They intentionally did not include a camera on the smaller Nest Hub (2nd gen), one reason being to make it more bedroom-friendly. The Nest Hub Max has a camera and is bigger. Google uses a lot of recycled materials; their fabrics are often made from recycled plastic bottles, etc. The build quality is decent – not as luxurious as Apple, but the devices feel well-made. One complaint on some Google devices has been the lack of a physical switch for microphone (the Nest Hub has a switch on the back to cut power to mics, actually, which is good).

Sonos and Others: Sonos tends to use metal grilles (One, Five) or quality polycarbonate (the new Era series have a perforated grille that wraps around). They have a more conventional hi-fi look (especially Five or Play:5 looks like a traditional speaker). The Era 100/300 introduced some cool design twists – Era 300 has an hourglass shape that’s eye-catching. Sonos usually sticks to black or white.

Portability: Note these speakers we discuss are mostly stationary, plug-in devices. Apple HomePods have no battery (nor do standard Echos or Nest Audios). If you need portable, there are other options (Sonos Move or Roam, or the Amazon Echo Input Portable sold in India, etc.), but those are niche. Apple’s assumption is your HomePod stays put on a shelf. Amazon and Google have some 3rd-party battery bases you can buy to make them portable, but that’s extra.

Durability: All are indoor devices (aside from special ones like Echo Dot for kids maybe being a bit rugged). None are weatherproof except something like Sonos Move which is IP56. Build-wise, HomePod is solid but some reported the mesh can get dusty or stained over time – you can’t remove and wash it easily. Amazon’s fabric covers can also get dusty, but at least on older Echos (like 2nd gen Echo) it was removable. On 4th gen sphere, it’s fixed. Google’s fabric is also fixed. Cleaning is by gentle vacuum or lint roller.

One design consideration: the visual indicator. Alexa’s trademark is the blue LED ring (and a red ring when muted, etc.). Google’s is the four colored dots (or a light bar on newer ones). Apple’s is the swirling orb on top of HomePod. Each has become an icon of the brand’s design. With a screen, these indicators become less important because the screen shows exactly what’s happening. The HomePod 3 might show a full UI when active instead of just a little orb – or Apple could still show a Siri waveform prominently.

Which looks best? That’s subjective. Apple’s HomePod has often been praised for its premium look and feel – it “has a sleek cylindrical design… delivers exceptional audio quality” and uses that mesh for both form and function ^[112]. Amazon’s Echo has become iconic in its own way and offers more playful options (limited editions with patterns, the Echo Dot Kids with tiger or panda designs, etc.). If your priority is a device that blends into home decor, many appreciate the approach Google and Apple take with fabric and simple shapes. Amazon covers that too but also doesn’t mind if a big Echo Show with a screen stands out as a gadget on your counter.

One final note: Controls and indicators. HomePod, as mentioned, minimal physical controls (just tap the top for volume or Siri). For some, that simplicity is nice; for others, not having a physical volume knob or button is a downside. Echo devices all have at least volume buttons; Nest Audio has capacitive touch zones. When the volume is high and you want to quickly silence, a real button can be easier than trying to shout at the speaker or fiddling with a phone app. Apple did add the ability to touch the top +/- for volume, but it’s not as tactile as a button. It is however aesthetically cleaner.

In summary, design reflects usage: Apple’s is an elegant black-box approach – it’s a speaker that doesn’t show you information (until HomePod 3’s screen changes that dynamic). Amazon and Google offered both screenless and screenful variants. If you like having a screen to glance at weather, camera feeds, lyrics, etc., Echo Show or Nest Hub have been the go-to. The HomePod 3 will finally give Apple users something similar in design to those, presumably with Apple’s spin on UI (likely more privacy-respecting – e.g., I’d expect no ads or sponsored content on an Apple display, whereas Echo Shows sometimes show product suggestions or weather from Alexa with little ads ^[113]). The materials and build quality on HomePod are top-notch, which partly explains the higher cost. On the flip side, if an Echo gets knocked off a shelf, you might not be as heartbroken as if a heavy HomePod’s mesh gets torn – cost and perceived value differ.

It’s fascinating to see the convergence: Apple started with just a premium speaker (HomePod), now moving to adding a screen. Amazon started with cheap little speakers, expanded to all sizes and screens (and even a rolling robot). Google somewhere in between, focusing on helpful displays and simple speakers. Design ethos: Apple – premium and tightly integrated; Amazon – utilitarian and experimental; Google – soft minimalism with a friendly vibe. All of them are trying to make the devices look at home in your home, rather than like obvious tech gadgets (with the exception of some Alexa stuff which is intentionally gadgety). This trend will continue as these companies want their devices in every room – they have to look acceptable on a nightstand or kitchen counter.

Price and Value for Money

When comparing the HomePod 3 to its competitors, price is a big factor because it influences the overall value proposition. Apple has never aimed to be the cheapest in any category, and smart speakers are no exception. Let’s break down the prices (as of late 2025, noting any recent changes) and what you get for the money:

• Apple HomePod (2nd Gen) – $299 at launch ^[114]. That price has generally held steady; Apple doesn’t do a lot of discounts, though occasionally one might find it for ~$279 on sale. At $299, it’s significantly more expensive than the standard Amazon Echo ($99) or Google Nest Audio ($99). Even Amazon’s premium Echo Studio is $199 (and often on sale for ~$150). So Apple is charging a premium, ostensibly for the premium sound and build. As The Verge’s review pointed out, $299 each means a stereo pair is ~$600, which is quite an ask ^[115]. One justification was Apple’s audio quality – the original HomePod at $349 was pricey but delivered sound that some said rivaled speakers above that price. With the $299 HomePod 2, Apple might have hit what they consider a “sweet spot” for what they’re offering, though some still feel it’s “hard to justify…most people will be better off with a $99 HomePod mini or a competing speaker” as MKBHD observed ^[116].
• Apple HomePod mini – $99. This is Apple’s entry-level, and it’s actually not far off from competitors (Nest Mini $49, Echo Dot $50). Yes, it’s about double the price of a Dot or Mini on paper, but Apple would argue it has better sound than those tiny ones (which it does) and includes Thread radios, etc. Still, $99 for a mini speaker that Siri controls with the same limitations – that’s for those who really want HomeKit/Siri in multiple rooms. Apple has kept it at $99 since 2020; no price drop. A new HomePod mini 2 could potentially stay $99 or maybe $129 if they substantially upgrade it, but likely Apple keeps that price point.
• Apple HomePod 3 (rumored) – possible $349–$499 range. There’s no official price yet, but speculation from outlets like Tom’s Guide suggests Apple might price just the base screen unit around $249 and then sell a Hi-Fi dock separately, which combined could hit $499 ^[117]. Alternatively, Apple might include the whole package and price it similar to an iPad plus speaker – maybe around $399 to start. If it’s closer to $500, it enters a new tier. That’s the cost of a decent tablet plus a mid-range speaker. Apple might justify it by positioning HomePod 3 not just as a speaker, but as a multi-functional home hub (security monitor with camera, FaceTime device, etc.). For context, the Google Pixel Tablet with Speaker Dock is $499 ^[118] (that includes a 10-inch tablet and a speaker/charging dock). Apple’s device might end up similar but smaller screen and presumably better speaker. If so, $399-$499 is plausible. Amazon’s Echo Show 10 (with a 10” screen) is $249, and the new Echo Show 21 (a 21” giant screen) is $399 ^[119]. Google’s Nest Hub Max (10”) was $229 (discontinued but that was the price). So if Apple comes in at say $399 for a ~7” screen device with great sound, it will be priced higher than any similar-sized competitor.
• Amazon Echo Dot (5th Gen) – $49.99 list, but effectively ~$25 on sale. Amazon heavily discounts these, especially on Prime Day or holidays. This is the cheapest way to get Alexa in a room. Obviously not a fair audio comparison to HomePod, but mentioning it for value: you could literally buy 6 Echo Dots (at sale price) for the cost of one HomePod. They won’t sound as good, but you’d have whole-home voice coverage.
• Amazon Echo (4th Gen) – $99.99 list, often ~$60 on sale. This is the mid-range Echo that in theory someone might choose instead of a HomePod mini or even instead of big HomePod if on budget. It has decent sound (better than a Dot, nowhere near HomePod’s fullness but okay for casual music).
• Echo Studio – $199.99 list, frequently $150 on sale. This is Amazon’s best-sounding speaker and a more direct competitor to HomePod’s audio quality. At $200 (and often less), it undercuts HomePod by a substantial margin. It lacks the finesse and maybe the tight integration, but purely in value: two Echo Studios ($300 when on sale) versus one HomePod ($299) – that could give you stereo sound at possibly bigger scale.
• Echo Show 8/10/15/21 – The prices vary: Show 8 (3rd Gen, 2023) is $149 list, Show 10 is $249, Show 15 is $299, Show 21 is $399. Amazon saturates price points. If someone wants a smart display, they can pick size vs price. Apple will have just one offering (HomePod 3 ~7”), at least initially. So Apple’s will likely be pricier than an Echo Show 8 but less than an Echo Show 21.
• Google Nest Mini – $49 (but often $25 on sale). Similar story to Echo Dot – cheap entry, often given away (Google and Amazon have done promos like buy a doorbell, get a free mini speaker, etc., something Apple doesn’t do).
• Google Nest Audio – $99 (often $75 or lower on sale). Google hasn’t updated this in a while; if they do a Nest Audio 2 or the new Gemini speaker, I suspect it might come in around $129-149 if it’s significantly improved. But if it’s positioned as Nest Audio replacement, maybe still $99. Google’s smart displays: Nest Hub (7”) was $99 (sometimes $50 on sale), Nest Hub Max (10”) was $229. Again, significantly cheaper than what Apple will charge for a screen device.
• Sonos – Sonos One SL (no mic) $179, Sonos One (with Alexa/Google Voice) $219, Era 100 $249, Era 300 $449. These are more expensive than Amazon/Google’s, comparable to or higher than Apple’s. But Sonos targets the audiophile and multi-room audio enthusiast who is willing to pay for sound and the Sonos app ecosystem. Sonos can be considered a premium alternative to HomePod for those who aren’t in Apple’s ecosystem or want Alexa/Google on a better speaker. If sound per dollar is the measure, actually Echo Studio at $150-200 is a bargain. Sonos and Apple are more about sound + polish at a premium.

Given these, how does value for money shake out?

• If you’re deep in Apple ecosystem, the HomePod adds value through integration that you can’t get elsewhere (for example, “Hey Siri, ping my iPhone” uses the synergy, or using it as a HomeKit hub, etc.). For those users, $299 might be justified as part of the whole Apple home experience. If you don’t use Apple Music or HomeKit, a HomePod’s value drops considerably – you’re basically paying a high price for a fancy AirPlay speaker with Siri that you might not use much. That’s why for many general consumers, an Echo or Nest is much better value since they play nice with anything (Android, iOS, any music service).
• The HomePod 3 with display will have to prove its value by combining several functions: a good speaker, a good smart display, a video calling device, and a home controller. If it’s $400+, it’s going up against not just smart speakers but entry-level iPads and dedicated devices. Apple likely sees an opportunity to create a “home hub” that people might place in a kitchen or living room to serve multiple purposes (FaceTime station, controlling lights, watching a recipe video, etc.). For Apple-centric homes, that could be worth it. But for someone open to other brands, one could question: Why not buy a $150 Echo Show 8 + a $250 Sonos speaker? That combo would give you possibly better sound and similar functionality, at the same or lower cost. Apple’s bet is that the integration and user experience of one Apple device doing it seamlessly is worth the Apple Tax.
• Expert commentary on value: Many reviewers of HomePod 2 basically said it sounds great but if you’re not an Apple/iPhone user, it’s a non-starter. Even if you are, the price is high. The Verge’s review mentioned that competitors’ premium speakers were closer to $200 ^[120], making HomePod a harder sell on price alone. They concluded Apple “played it safe” by keeping the price the same as before ^[121]. MKBHD’s take was that it’s kind of a “confusing” product because it’s a fantastic speaker but a “bad product” in that it doesn’t justify its place for most people at that price ^[122]. Wired’s review was even harsher: they gave HomePod 2 a 5/10 partly due to price and ecosystem limits, recommending people spend the same money on other speakers ^[123].
• On the flip side, for those who did buy HomePods, they often report high satisfaction in sound quality and how well it works within their Apple life (like controlling Apple TV audio, etc.). It’s very much a you get what you pay for, if you can utilize it fully scenario.

Amazon and Google value: They often sacrifice profit on hardware to gain market share. Echo devices are sometimes sold at or below cost (especially the Dots and such). That means purely dollars-to-specs, Amazon gives you more. Google similarly priced aggressive (the Nest Hub at $99 was a steal for a 7” touchscreen speaker with sleep tracking tech included). For budget-conscious consumers or those not tied to Apple, it’s hard to argue against how much Alexa or Google can do for relatively little money. For example, with ~$300 you could equip 3-4 rooms with Echo Dots and one Echo Studio for your living room, covering your house in sound and voice control. That same $300 is one HomePod that covers one room (unless you open doorways to spread sound).

Software updates & longevity in value: Another angle is that Apple doesn’t drop support quickly. That might mean a HomePod could last you many years. Amazon and Google are not known to brick devices often, but Google did discontinue some services (like they bricked the original Google Home Hub when they replaced it with Fuchsia OS – though that was an upgrade, not really a brick). If one worries about spending money and the ecosystem pivoting, Apple’s track record is okay – except note Apple did discontinue the first HomePod after only 3 years on market due to low sales, which left early adopters a bit high and dry (though Apple did push updates for a couple more years). Amazon and Google keep churning out new models, but they usually keep the old working (the first Echo from 2014 still responds, albeit slower, as per reports ^[124]). The risk might be more if the company changes strategy (Google could theoretically decide in a few years to drop support for older hardware in favor of new ones for Gemini, but currently they said Gemini is coming to existing devices ^[125]).

At the end of the day, value for money comes down to what you need:

• If you want the best sound for the price and don’t care about Siri, Amazon’s Echo Studio (or a Sonos One at similar cost) is a better value than HomePod 2.
• If you want the best voice assistant and features for cheap, a $50 Echo or Nest will do tons of things – huge value.
• Apple’s HomePod is not about low cost value; it’s about delivering a premium, Apple-integrated experience at a premium price. For those who appreciate the difference (and have the disposable income), it’s worth it. For others, it seems overpriced. This polarization is captured well in the reviews: some praise its quality, others basically say “who is this for besides the Apple faithful?”

One more data point: when the original HomePod was discounted to $299 (from $349) in 2019, it still didn’t sell great. The mini at $99, however, sold quite well – indicating that consumers do have a price sensitivity and there was pent-up demand for a cheaper HomePod. It’s interesting that Apple didn’t try a $199 mid-size speaker; they jumped back to $299 full-size. Perhaps the HomePod 3 with screen will justify a higher price through additional functionality beyond music.

In summary, Apple charges a premium for HomePod, and while it offers superb build and sound quality, that premium is hard to swallow if you compare spec-for-spec with rivals. As one review summary put it, “The consistent sound and returning $299 price tag make it seem like Apple is playing it safe” ^[126] – they didn’t cut the price to broaden appeal; they targeted the same niche of users who value what it offers. When we see HomePod 3’s official price, we’ll know if Apple intends to broaden that niche or double down on premium.

Software Features and Updates

All these devices are heavily defined by their software – both the features at launch and how they improve (or sometimes regress) with updates. In the smart speaker arena, software updates can bring new abilities over time, extending the life of the product.

Apple’s HomePod software: HomePods run a version of iOS (actually a variant of tvOS under the hood). Apple has kept HomePod software in sync with iOS releases. For example, alongside iOS 16, HomePod got Software Version 16 with some new features. Notably, Apple added the Sound Recognition feature in a post-launch update, enabling HomePod to listen for smoke/CO alarms and send alerts ^[127]. They also enabled Multi-user voice recognition and Handoff and other features via updates. The HomePod mini had dormant sensors (temperature/humidity) that Apple suddenly activated in a 2023 update when HomePod 2 launched ^[128] – then both HomePod 2 and mini could report climate readings and trigger HomeKit automations based on them. These show Apple’s approach: the hardware might have capabilities that software unlocks later.

Apple typically supports devices for at least 5 years. If HomePod 3 comes out in 2025, expect support till ~2030. They dropped support for original HomePod in HomePod Software 16 (2022) but only minorly – it still gets security fixes but maybe not all new features that require the newer chip. For example, Spatial Audio and Dolby Atmos support was added to HomePod 2 and mini, but original HomePod got it too via update in 2021. However, something like the temperature sensor feature obviously couldn’t come to original because it lacked that sensor.

Looking ahead, Siri 2.0’s software integration will be key. Apple may release a big HomePod OS update alongside or after the HomePod 3 to retrofit some Siri 2.0 features to HomePod 2 and mini if hardware allows. But some features may not backport. For instance, if Siri 2.0 heavily uses an A-series chip’s Neural Engine, the HomePod 2’s S7 chip might be underpowered compared to the rumored A14 or S9 in new devices.

Apple has also used HomePod to extend other Apple services: e.g., you can ask it to find your devices (plays a sound on a lost iPhone), or use it as an Intercom system. These are software features that came after initial release. We might see more integration like that (maybe using HomePod as a home intercom with video if HomePod 3 has a screen/camera, like a stationary FaceTime device that can also drop in on others – akin to Alexa’s Drop In, but Apple style).

Amazon Alexa updates: Amazon doesn’t do OS versions like Apple; Alexa is continually updated in the cloud. New features show up and sometimes Amazon will announce them, other times you just discover Alexa can do something new. For example, Alexa Guard was added after Echos were already out. They also added things like Alexa Guest Mode (for visitors) or AI-based language model improvements steadily. Alexa’s phone app updates bring new ways to configure routines, etc.

One big software move is the launch of Alexa+ in 2025 which we discussed – effectively an AI brain transplant for Alexa. This update is partly cloud (the AI models) and partly on-device (some might require more processing; Amazon might leverage newer Echo hardware for better performance). Alexa+ introduction also brought a UI update for some Echo devices: e.g., Amazon said Alexa+ works best on screen devices, and they introduced an Adaptive Display where Echo Show screens show more personalized content when you approach ^[129]. They also mention Alexa+ will remember context across devices and even to the Alexa mobile app ^[130]. That means a continuous conversation that could start on a speaker and continue on your phone as text or voice. So a lot of this is software enabling new cross-device experiences.

Amazon tends to support Echo hardware for a long time, albeit older ones might not get all features. For instance, the first-gen Echo doesn’t support Alexa Guard because it lacks the processing for it. Similarly, Alexa+ might have a cutoff – Amazon specifically listed the devices that get early access (Shows 8/10/15/21) ^[131], implying maybe older or audio-only Echos will get it later or in a limited form. But overall, if you have an Echo, you can expect it to actually improve over time with new Alexa capabilities (which is great for value). The downside is Amazon sometimes changes things (like removing the option to not send recordings, as mentioned, which some might consider a negative “update” in privacy terms ^[132]). Alexa’s skills ecosystem is also evolving – Amazon occasionally deprecates old skills or APIs, but largely it’s additive.

Google Assistant/Gemini updates: Google used to do yearly big Assistant updates (often at I/O they’d announce new features like Continued Conversation, Duplex for restaurant reservations, interpreter mode, etc.). Many of those came to Google speakers via software after announcement. In 2023, Google brought Quick Phrases (ability to answer common things like alarms without saying “Hey Google”) to Nest Hub. They also did a major update: the Nest Hub 2nd gen got a completely new OS (Fuchsia) via an OTA update – remarkably, users didn’t notice much difference, it was seamless UI-wise.

Now with Gemini, that’s an even bigger switch. Google is effectively replacing the “brains” of Assistant with Gemini AI on the existing hardware, as a software update starting Oct 2025 ^{[133] [134]}. It’s a cloud-side change plus some on-device components. They also hinted at a “paid option” for some features ^[135], meaning some capabilities might need a subscription (could be integrated into something like Google One or Nest Aware, or a new plan). That’s a shift because Google Assistant has been free so far. But likely the basic voice control stays free; the subscription might be for advanced conversation or integrations (akin to Alexa+ but we’ll see how Google structures it).

Google’s track record in supporting hardware is mixed – they have sometimes dropped products (e.g., they killed the Works with Nest program and forced migration to Google Home – causing some loss of functionality for those who used Nest with third-party integrations). They also have had some snafus (recently, older Google Home and Home Mini speakers have been reportedly failing or losing functionality, which has upset longtime users). Indeed, Tom’s Guide referenced a “speaker debacle” with older Google Homes failing ^[136]. Google has acknowledged some hardware failures (e.g., some original Home Minis had an issue with the touch sensor that forced them to disable it in software, etc.). Google tends to focus updates on newer models; older ones might not get every new trick, possibly due to performance constraints or just product policy.

Feature comparisons:

• Multi-room audio: All three support grouping speakers for synchronized music. Apple uses AirPlay 2 (choose multiple HomePods/airplay speakers in Control Center). Amazon uses Multi-Room Music groups configured in Alexa app. Google uses speaker groups in Google Home app. These have improved via software (Google had to work out some sync bugs, Amazon initially didn’t allow certain combos but now does, Apple’s AirPlay 2 launch in 2018 enabled multi-room properly for them).
• Stereo pairing: Apple added stereo pair for HomePods via software update after launch of original (it was announced but came slightly later). Amazon also eventually allowed stereo pairing on some Echo models. Google Nest Audio can pair two for stereo (added in software too).
• Handoff and continuity: Apple’s unique Handoff feature (tap phone to HomePod) came in software after U1 chip introduction. Amazon is reportedly working on something similar (maybe using ultrasound or presence detection to transfer audio between Echos, but not sure if launched widely). Google can transfer streams via voice (“move music to Living Room speaker”).
• Third-party integrations: Amazon and Google can both act as Bluetooth speakers via software support. Apple steadfastly has not enabled that on HomePod via software (it’s likely a conscious choice, not a technical impossibility). Will they ever? Unlikely, as long as AirPlay is their preferred method.
• Voice assistant improvements: Already covered, but to note, Apple did drop the “Hey” from “Hey Siri” on HomePod with iOS 17, allowing just “Siri” as the wake word (like Amazon and Google allow just their name). That’s a small software change that makes interaction easier. Amazon plans to allow certain personalized wake words and hotwords like “Ziggy” etc., and Google’s Gemini may enable more natural turn-taking (maybe no need for “Hey Google” every time in a conversation).
• Integration with other devices: Apple’s HomePods got the ability to notify on Apple TV when someone rings a HomeKit doorbell, for example – these kinds of cross-device features often come in updates. Amazon Echos integrated with Fire TV to do home theater, and that improved with updates enabling more channels (Dolby Atmos from Echo Studios, etc.). Google allowed Nest speakers to pair with Chromecast/Google TV for audio output recently – a feature added by software to compete with Apple’s Home theater via HomePod. So each ecosystem is playing catch-up via updates to parity on those features.

Security and bug fixes: Smart speakers do listen and process a lot, so all companies push security updates if issues are found. For instance, if a vulnerability was found that could allow someone on the Wi-Fi to snoop or something, they patch it. Most devices auto-update by default (HomePod updates you can trigger manually or let auto, Alexa devices auto-update quietly, Google’s too).

User control over updates: Apple lets you toggle auto-update for HomePod in the Home app. Amazon and Google don’t even expose an update control – it just happens in background. That’s usually fine, but it means if Amazon/Google change something in a way you don’t like, you can’t opt out by not updating (like Amazon turning on more cloud processing for Alexa, you can’t stick on an old version). Apple’s approach offers a little more transparency, showing the version number and all.

Future software features:

• Apple might introduce more apps or complications for a HomePod with screen. Perhaps weather widgets, calendar view, sticky notes, etc. They likely will keep it simple at first (the rumor that it runs some apps like Safari, Music, Home, etc. suggests it’s more than just a Home app display ^[137]). If it can run Safari, theoretically you have a small web browser on your countertop HomePod – that’s a whole new software dimension for Apple’s smart speaker line.
• Amazon will continue building out Alexa’s capabilities. One interesting future angle: Alexa and Google Assistant can both interface with AI chatbots now. Alexa can access a version of Anthropic’s Claude as part of Alexa+ (and Amazon’s own LLM “Nova”) ^[138]. Google’s Gemini is obviously an AI model. Apple hasn’t announced anything like ChatGPT integration (some speculated Siri 2.0 might have a mode to do more open-ended AI chat, but it’s not clear). We might see in the near future features like “Alexa, summarize this article” or “Google, help me plan a vacation” where the assistant leverages AI to produce a more human-like interaction. These are more software/service features than hardware, but they will be key differentiators if one assistant leaps ahead in helpfulness or personality.
• Content and Ads: Amazon shows bits of sponsored content on Echo Show screens (like recipe suggestions that might be sponsored, or news headlines – though you can disable a lot of it) ^[139]. Google’s displays avoid ads (aside from maybe subtle promotion of services) and focus on personal content or smart home controls. Apple certainly will not put ads on a HomePod screen given their stance on privacy and premium experience. So software-wise, the UI philosophy differs: Apple and Google see the smart display as a utility/info hub (Apple’s might show say your HomeKit camera feeds, etc.), Amazon sees it also as another surface for engagement (they even have Amazon Prime Video, Amazon shopping, etc., accessible via Echo Show). Apple could, for instance, enable FaceTime and maybe Zoom or WebEx on HomePod 3 – it’s rumored to have a camera for FaceTime ^[140]. If they open to third-party video apps like Zoom, that would be interesting (iPad has them, so maybe).
• Updates Frequency: Apple typically updates HomePod OS annually with iOS, plus point releases for bug fixes. Amazon and Google push minor updates every few weeks or months (invisibly). You’ll occasionally see Alexa release notes on some forums, or Google’s firmware versions on a help page, but average users don’t track it.

In summary, the trajectory is that these devices improve over time with updates, adding capabilities that might not have existed at launch. This is great for consumers – your device can actually do more today than when you bought it a year or two ago. However, with the introduction of premium AI services (Alexa+, potentially Google’s paid tier), we are seeing a shift where some new features might be locked behind subscriptions. That’s an emerging trend in 2025: your $50 speaker could become much smarter, but only if you pay a monthly fee (unless you’re in Apple’s world, where they might bake it in “for free” but of course you paid a lot upfront for the device).

One must also consider that with big updates, sometimes old features change. Google Assistant’s transition to Gemini, for instance, completely replacing the old might cause some things to behave differently. When Google sunset “Works with Nest” in favor of Google Home integration, many enthusiasts were upset because their old automation broke. So software updates can sometimes remove or alter things. Amazon once removed the ability to trigger routines from Echo Buttons or some third-party triggers which annoyed some power users. Apple’s HomeKit has had its share of bugs (they did a big Home architecture upgrade in iOS 16 that had to be pulled and re-released because it was causing device issues).

Reliability of updates: Apple typically high, though the Home architecture fiasco was a black eye. Amazon and Google, because of the continuous approach, sometimes have issues like “Google Home keeps disconnecting a light until patch next week” or “Alexa routine stopped working after some change”. The community forums often highlight these hiccups, but they usually get fixed.

To encapsulate, software is the soul of these smart speakers. Apple tends to add features conservatively and keep things tightly integrated (you won’t wake up to radical UI changes on HomePod – it doesn’t even have a visible UI aside from sounds and lights – until the screen model arrives). Amazon and Google iterate fast, occasionally break things, but mostly expand what their devices can do, often guided by user feedback and competition. Given how quickly AI is advancing, the latter half of 2025 could bring some of the biggest software leaps we’ve seen in years for smart speakers – it’s arguably the dawn of a new generation of what these assistants can handle, as all three invest heavily in AI upgrades.

Upcoming Competitor Models and Launches

The smart speaker market in 2025 isn’t static – new models are on the horizon or have just launched, making the landscape more competitive. Here’s a look at what’s known and rumored about upcoming devices from each major player:

• Apple HomePod 3: As detailed earlier, expected launch is late 2025 (reports point to Q3 2025, perhaps aligning with the iPhone 17 event or a standalone event) ^[141]. Both Mark Gurman (Bloomberg) and analyst Ming-Chi Kuo have indicated Apple pushed this device’s release to 2025 to wait for Siri 2.0 and iOS 19’s smart home updates ^{[142] [143]}. The 7-inch touch display and built-in camera are its headline features ^[144], representing Apple’s entry into smart displays. If Apple follows its usual pattern, we might see a preview at WWDC 2025 if there are developer aspects (like needing to adapt HomeKit apps or something), or just a September 2025 reveal. It’s possible Apple will brand it differently (maybe “HomePod Hub” or something) since it’s such a departure, but current leaks call it HomePod 3. Alongside it, HomePod mini 2 is also anticipated in a similar timeframe – Kuo said late 2024 or 2025 for a new mini. In fact, as we saw, Gurman mentioned an updated HomePod mini with an S-series chip (S9) and better Wi-Fi (6E/7) is “coming soon” ^[145]. That could even drop in late 2025 too, giving Apple a refreshed lineup: HomePod mini 2 ($99) and HomePod 3 ($???). So Apple’s next moves: HomePod mini refresh with minor improvements, and the big new HomePod with screen.
• Amazon: Amazon traditionally held big device launch events in the fall (September) showcasing new Echo models. In 2023, they launched the Echo Hub and some refreshed Echo Show devices ^[146]. In 2024, Amazon might have introduced perhaps an Echo (5th gen) – but there wasn’t a lot of news, possibly because focus was on Alexa+ development. Now in 2025, Amazon already did a notable event in Feb (which was earlier than usual, likely to unveil Alexa+ and the Echo Show 21) ^{[147] [148]}. It wouldn’t be surprising if Amazon also does a late 2025 event (maybe to launch the next generation Echo speakers timed for holiday season). What could be upcoming from Amazon?
  • Possibly an Echo (5th Gen) speaker or Echo Studio 2. The current Echo 4th gen is 3 years old now, and Echo Studio is 4 years old. Amazon might upgrade them with better processors or slight acoustic tweaks. We haven’t heard specific rumors, but an Echo Studio 2 could, for instance, add support for Wi-Fi 6, new chips to better handle Alexa+ on-device, or improved driver tuning.
  • There’s also the category of wearables or mobile Alexa (Echo Buds, etc.), but that’s tangential.
  • Since Amazon just launched a massive 21-inch Echo Show, I doubt they’ll have a bigger one soon; rather they might refine the software on it.
  • One upcoming thing: Panos Panay, the former Windows devices chief, is now at Amazon leading Alexa devices ^[149]. He likely has a vision for future Alexa hardware (maybe deeper integration with TVs, or new form factors like perhaps an Alexa tablet). We may see hints of his influence in late 2025 or 2026 products.
  • Given Amazon’s love for experiments, I wouldn’t rule out a surprise product. For example, earlier rumors spoke of Amazon making a wall-mounted Echo with a large display (which manifested as Echo Show 15 in 2021, and Echo Hub in 2023 for controls). Perhaps an Echo Soundbar for TVs (they haven’t done an Alexa-integrated soundbar except partnerships, but with Alexa+ and Fire TV, a first-party soundbar could come).
  In terms of known announcements, nothing beats what’s already unveiled about Alexa+. That’s the core of Amazon’s near-term strategy: not new speakers per se, but making all existing Echos more powerful through AI. And indeed, they are monetizing it. So an “upcoming model” from Amazon might not be a speaker, but the Alexa+ service rollout finishing by end of 2025, and any hardware needed to optimize that (maybe an Echo Show 8 (4th Gen) or new chips in devices to better handle on-device AI processing for latency – although Amazon’s approach seems cloud-heavy).
• Google: Google has an event scheduled October 2025 (Oct 1) specifically teased for smart home announcements ^{[150] [151]}. What we expect:
  • New Nest Speaker (Gemini-powered): We have Android Headlines/The Verge leak confirming a Nest “Home Speaker” with new colors and light ring, to be launched around the same time as Gemini for Home ^{[152] [153]}. It can pair with Google TV streamer for spatial audio ^[154], so definitely aimed to showcase a hardware upgrade. It might effectively be a Nest Audio 2, possibly priced ~$120-$150, slotting as a mid-range smart speaker with improved sound.
  • New Nest Hub? The Verge speculated an updated smart display is due since none since 2021 ^[155]. Rumors earlier in 2023/24 actually suggested Google was working on a Nest Hub with a detachable tablet (similar to Pixel Tablet concept but as a Nest device). However, Google then released the Pixel Tablet in 2023 which kind of filled that role (a tablet that doubles as a smart display on a dock). So perhaps Google might position the Pixel Tablet as their only smart display for a while, or they might still update the Nest Hub Max with better speakers or camera. There was a leak of a Nest Hub Ultra in 2023 with a 10-inch screen and better camera, but it hasn’t materialized yet.
  • New Nest Cam / Doorbell: Already leaked for Oct 2025, Google might launch new cameras (a battery Nest Cam 2nd gen or something) alongside. Not directly audio-related but part of the ecosystem.
  • Gemini AI roll-out: Oct 1 is the date Assistant on speakers becomes Gemini. There might be some immediate new voice features at launch (like maybe improved voice app controls, or the ability to converse more freely). Possibly Google will also rebrand parts of the Google Home app or introduce new subscription (there’s rumor of a “Google Home Plus” subscription, maybe bundling Nest Aware and Gemini premium – hinted by a leak about a rebranded subscription service ^{[156] [157]}).
  • If I recall, there was also chatter of Google making a portable Nest speaker or leaning into wearables (they launched Pixel Buds with Assistant, Pixel Watch with Assistant). But nothing specific as “upcoming speaker X” beyond what we covered.
• Others / Wildcards:
  • Meta / Facebook had Portal devices (smart displays focused on video calling), but they exited consumer market in 2022. Not coming back as far as we know.
  • Microsoft doesn’t have a Cortana speaker anymore (that died off).
  • Alibaba, Baidu, Xiaomi etc., have smart speakers but for China (not in this scope).
  • Bose had a Smart Speaker line with Alexa/Google support, and might refresh those.
  • Harman Kardon or others occasionally put out Alexa or Google compatible speakers (like HK Citation, JBL Link series with Assistant – that JBL Authentics line just launched with both Alexa and Google built-in, which is an interesting twist in multi-assistant support ^[158]).
  • Sonos is reportedly working on an era of new products – possibly a smaller Move Mini, or a next-gen Sonos One. Sonos has its own voice assistant (limited to music control). In 2025 or 2026, Sonos One (2017) might be replaced or the Era 100 is basically that. If Sonos does anything radical like a display or something, no signs yet. But I suspect Sonos will stick to audio-first, maybe a cheaper soundbar, etc., rather than branching into displays.

For consumers, the upcoming models mean more choice and likely better deals on current ones. For example, if Google releases a Nest Audio 2, the original might get price cuts (though it’s already inexpensive). If Amazon were to release an Echo 5th Gen, they might throw in something like Wi-Fi 6 connectivity or even more bass, but their current gen is still solid.

One more competitor mention: Apple’s wider home strategy – Apple is also reportedly exploring a combined Apple TV + HomePod + FaceTime camera device (basically a soundbar with Apple TV functions) ts2.tech, and even a home robot with a screen and limbs (Gurman hinted very early research on a robot arm that attaches to a HomePod for moving it or expressing personality, but that’s “still years away” ^[159]). Those are more far-out. But if Apple were to do a soundbar or a bigger screen device for the home, it could come in late 2025 or 2026 as well, as part of their push to catch up in the living room.

Summing up, in the smart speaker/display race:

• Apple (late 2025): HomePod 3 with screen (and Siri 2.0), possibly HomePod mini 2 around same period. No other known models (maybe a future HomePod 4 beyond 2025 if they keep iterating).
• Google (late 2025): New Nest speaker (Gemini AI flagship), possibly new Nest Hub or at least heavy software updates, plus integration of AI across all existing devices starting October.
• Amazon (2025 ongoing): Alexa+ rolling out to existing Echos, new Echo Show 21 already launched, watch for any new core Echo speakers or maybe an Echo Studio refresh. Amazon likely to continue leveraging its existing large install base with software features rather than pushing expensive new hardware, but they always have some new gadget each year.

All these upcoming developments will influence the comparison. For instance, if Google’s new Nest speaker comes out and undercuts HomePod 3’s price significantly while offering decent sound and a smarter AI, that could sway many buyers. Similarly, if Alexa+ makes even older $50 Echoes suddenly able to handle complex queries as well as a $300 HomePod, Apple will face pressure to demonstrate Siri 2.0’s advantages (perhaps in privacy or deep integration).

In tech, there’s always something better around the corner, but late 2025 is a particularly charged moment where each brand is leveling up their smart speaker game – Apple by finally adding a display and new Siri, Google by revamping their AI and releasing new hardware, and Amazon by evolving Alexa to be more powerful and tying it into their Prime ecosystem.

Expert Opinions and Reviews

To get an objective sense of how the HomePod 3 and its competitors stack up, it helps to hear what industry experts and reviewers are saying. Here are a few insightful quotes and perspectives from tech experts:

• On Apple HomePod’s strengths and weaknesses: Many experts praise the HomePod’s sound quality but question its practicality given Siri’s limits and Apple’s closed ecosystem. Tech reviewer Marques Brownlee (MKBHD) delivered a blunt verdict on the HomePod 2, calling it “one of the most confusing new Apple products… both an amazing speaker and a bad product.” He noted that while the audio is fantastic, “Siri can be bad at times, Spotify can’t be set as default, and the price is hard to justify,” concluding that most people would be better served by either a cheaper HomePod mini or a competitor’s speaker depending on their needs ^[160]. This encapsulates a common sentiment: hardware-wise Apple nails it, but the limitations of Siri and service compatibility drag down the overall value.
• On HomePod vs. rivals in sound: Audio-specialist publications have often put HomePod against Echo and Sonos. What Hi-Fi? remarked that Amazon’s Echo Studio, touted as Amazon’s best-sounding speaker, “would have struggled against the original HomePod” in sound quality ^[161]. Stuff magazine’s comparison found that “The Apple HomePod is a premium-priced speaker with excellent sound quality… it offers a more even sound profile and more profound bass” compared to the also-excellent (but pricier) Sonos Era 300 ^[162]. Meanwhile, the Echo Studio was lauded as “an affordable speaker that offers exceptional sound quality… with a wide soundstage,” though not quite as refined in Atmos performance as Sonos ^[163]. The consensus among audio experts is that HomePod delivers superb sound for its size, often outclassing similarly sized Alexa/Google speakers. However, those Amazon/Google speakers might offer, say, 80-90% of the audio quality at a fraction of the price, which is an important caveat.
• On voice assistant smarts: Experts often rank Google Assistant first in intelligence, Alexa a close second (with far more third-party skills), and Siri last. As Tom’s Guide bluntly put it when reporting on Google’s next-gen assistant, “anything will likely be better than Google Assistant, which was so bad that the company had to apologize for its lackluster performance” ^[164] – a surprisingly harsh critique of old Google Assistant, showing even Google recognized shortcomings before Gemini. On Siri, veteran tech journalist Walt Mossberg years ago dubbed it “too limited,” and that criticism lingered; Siri has improved in reliability but not dramatically in capability since. The hope expressed by many is that Apple’s AI investments will finally change that. Mark Gurman has noted Apple’s internal dissatisfaction with Siri and the efforts to overhaul it for a more AI-driven future. We see signs of that priority: HomePod 3 is delayed specifically to align with Siri’s improvement ^[165]. So, experts are watching closely. If Siri 2.0 flops, reviewers will likely continue to say: great speaker, but assistant not up to par. If Siri 2.0 shines, it could flip the narrative for Apple.
• On ecosystem integration and device support: Reviewers frequently warn buyers to stick to the ecosystem that fits them. Wired’s comprehensive 2025 smart speaker guide explicitly advises that Apple’s HomePods, while cool-looking, “don’t have anywhere near the level of third-party smart home support” of Alexa or Google ^[166]. They gave HomePod mini a 6/10 and the larger HomePod just 5/10 in their reviews, largely because of that ecosystem lock-in and its “muddy midrange” sound profile that didn’t impress their audiophile ears ^[167]. Their bottom line: “You can get a full-size Nest or Echo speaker for the same money, and you should” ^[168], unless you specifically need Apple’s ecosystem. This is a strong endorsement of Alexa/Google value over Apple from a respected source.
• On price and value: The Verge’s review of HomePod 2 by Chris Welch noted the “high cost is a sticking point” and that competitors’ premium speakers are closer to $200 ^[169]. He appreciated the improvements and new sensors, but ultimately said Apple “played it safe” by not pushing the envelope or price to be more competitive ^[170]. As a result, the recommendation was mixed: it’s the best choice only for those deep in Apple’s ecosystem who specifically want its features.
• On Alexa+ and AI upgrades: Early impressions of Alexa+ from those who tested it have been cautiously optimistic. TechRadar’s Lance Ulanoff interviewed Amazon’s Panos Panay, who was excited about usage patterns, and reported that Alexa+ felt much more personal and capable than before – a needed evolution for Alexa to stay relevant with the AI boom ^[171]. If Alexa+ delivers, we might see reviewers later in 2025 saying Alexa has leapfrogged Google’s assistant in some ways (especially if Google stumbles in the transition to Gemini). But if Alexa+’s paywall or privacy changes irk users, that could draw criticism. Already, Wired highlighted the privacy angle: “Alexa+ will also require that all voice recordings be sent to Amazon… that feature [local processing] was killed in March” ^[172] – indicating some concern in the tech press about Amazon’s approach to AI vs. privacy.
• On Google’s strategy: Google’s been chastised for neglecting their smart home hardware lately. The phrase “Nest Hub in 2025: less useful than a broken brick,” from a frustrated Reddit post ^[173], captures the sentiment of some power users who feel Google lagged in updating features. The upcoming October releases aim to remedy that. If Google’s new hardware and Gemini AI impress, expect positive reappraisals. If not, Google could continue to face skepticism. Journalists like JR Raphael often note Google’s inconsistency in product lines (“Google giveth and Google taketh away”). The new Nest speaker leak covered by The Verge’s Dominic Preston suggests Google is at least finally refreshing its audio hardware to pair with its AI push ^{[174] [175]}.

In summary, expert opinions currently commend Apple for making one of the best-sounding smart speakers, but criticize it for Siri’s relative weakness and Apple’s high price/lock-in. Amazon’s Alexa speakers are praised for versatility and value, though Alexa’s utility plateaued until this new AI update – now experts are intrigued to see if Alexa+ can maintain Amazon’s lead. Google’s Assistant was often lauded as smartest, but their hardware and strategy missteps drew criticism; the Gemini revamp is their chance to reclaim glory, and tech watchers are eager to see if it delivers as promised (the idea of truly fluid conversation has everyone’s attention).

When making a buying decision or comparison, it’s wise to heed these expert takes: consider what ecosystem you live in, what you value more (sound quality vs. assistant smarts vs. device compatibility), and note that the “best” in late 2025 might shift as these new updates roll out. As of now, HomePod 3 looks poised to challenge the status quo, but it will have to impress reviewers on multiple fronts – audio, interface, and AI – to overturn the narrative that has existed so far. All the while, Amazon and Google aren’t sitting still. It truly is an exciting time in the smart speaker space, and as consumers we’ll benefit from the competition driving innovation.

Sources:

• Apple HomePod 3 rumors and features – Tom’s Guide ^{[176] [177] [178] [179]}
• Alexa+ AI assistant announcement – Amazon Devices Event ^{[180] [181]}
• Google Gemini Assistant integration news – Tom’s Guide ^{[182] [183]}
• Audio hardware comparisons – What Hi-Fi ^{[184] [185]}, Stuff Magazine ^[186]
• Reviews and expert quotes – AppleInsider (MKBHD quote) ^[187], Wired (smart speaker guide) ^{[188] [189]}, The Verge (HomePod review) ^{[190] [191]}, Tom’s Guide (Google Assistant apology) ^[192].

References

1. www.tomsguide.com, 2. www.tomsguide.com, 3. www.theverge.com, 4. www.whathifi.com, 5. www.theverge.com, 6. www.aboutamazon.com, 7. www.tomsguide.com, 8. www.tomsguide.com, 9. www.theverge.com, 10. www.wired.com, 11. appleinsider.com, 12. press.aboutamazon.com, 13. www.whathifi.com, 14. www.whathifi.com, 15. appleinsider.com, 16. www.tomsguide.com, 17. www.theverge.com, 18. appleinsider.com, 19. www.wired.com, 20. www.tomsguide.com, 21. www.theverge.com, 22. www.theverge.com, 23. www.tomsguide.com, 24. www.tomsguide.com, 25. www.theverge.com, 26. www.theverge.com, 27. www.theverge.com, 28. www.wired.com, 29. www.macrumors.com, 30. www.theverge.com, 31. www.theverge.com, 32. www.whathifi.com, 33. www.whathifi.com, 34. www.tomsguide.com, 35. www.tomsguide.com, 36. www.tomsguide.com, 37. www.tomsguide.com, 38. www.whathifi.com, 39. www.whathifi.com, 40. www.whathifi.com, 41. www.whathifi.com, 42. www.whathifi.com, 43. www.whathifi.com, 44. www.whathifi.com, 45. www.whathifi.com, 46. www.theverge.com, 47. www.stuff.tv, 48. www.stuff.tv, 49. www.stuff.tv, 50. appleinsider.com, 51. www.stuff.tv, 52. www.theverge.com, 53. www.whathifi.com, 54. www.theverge.com, 55. appleinsider.com, 56. appleinsider.com, 57. www.tomsguide.com, 58. www.tomsguide.com, 59. www.tomsguide.com, 60. www.tomsguide.com, 61. www.tomsguide.com, 62. www.theverge.com, 63. www.aboutamazon.com, 64. www.aboutamazon.com, 65. www.aboutamazon.com, 66. www.aboutamazon.com, 67. www.aboutamazon.com, 68. www.wired.com, 69. www.wired.com, 70. www.tomsguide.com, 71. www.tomsguide.com, 72. www.tomsguide.com, 73. www.tomsguide.com, 74. www.tomsguide.com, 75. www.tomsguide.com, 76. www.tomsguide.com, 77. www.tomsguide.com, 78. www.aboutamazon.com, 79. www.theverge.com, 80. www.wired.com, 81. www.aboutamazon.com, 82. www.theverge.com, 83. www.theverge.com, 84. www.theverge.com, 85. www.wired.com, 86. press.aboutamazon.com, 87. community.smartthings.com, 88. www.theverge.com, 89. www.theverge.com, 90. support.google.com, 91. appleinsider.com, 92. www.theverge.com, 93. www.wired.com, 94. www.wired.com, 95. www.wired.com, 96. www.wired.com, 97. www.wired.com, 98. www.theverge.com, 99. www.whathifi.com, 100. appleinsider.com, 101. www.wired.com, 102. www.wired.com, 103. www.wired.com, 104. www.tomsguide.com, 105. www.whathifi.com, 106. www.tomsguide.com, 107. www.tomsguide.com, 108. www.tomsguide.com, 109. www.tomsguide.com, 110. www.tomsguide.com, 111. www.tomsguide.com, 112. www.stuff.tv, 113. www.wired.com, 114. appleinsider.com, 115. appleinsider.com, 116. appleinsider.com, 117. www.tomsguide.com, 118. www.tomsguide.com, 119. www.wired.com, 120. appleinsider.com, 121. appleinsider.com, 122. appleinsider.com, 123. www.wired.com, 124. www.wired.com, 125. www.tomsguide.com, 126. appleinsider.com, 127. www.theverge.com, 128. www.theverge.com, 129. www.aboutamazon.com, 130. www.aboutamazon.com, 131. www.aboutamazon.com, 132. www.wired.com, 133. www.tomsguide.com, 134. www.tomsguide.com, 135. www.tomsguide.com, 136. www.tomsguide.com, 137. www.tomsguide.com, 138. www.aboutamazon.com, 139. www.wired.com, 140. www.tomsguide.com, 141. www.tomsguide.com, 142. www.tomsguide.com, 143. www.tomsguide.com, 144. www.tomsguide.com, 145. www.macrumors.com, 146. www.wired.com, 147. www.aboutamazon.com, 148. www.aboutamazon.com, 149. www.techradar.com, 150. www.engadget.com, 151. www.engadget.com, 152. www.theverge.com, 153. www.theverge.com, 154. www.theverge.com, 155. www.theverge.com, 156. www.tomsguide.com, 157. www.tomsguide.com, 158. www.wired.com, 159. www.tomsguide.com, 160. appleinsider.com, 161. www.whathifi.com, 162. www.stuff.tv, 163. www.stuff.tv, 164. www.tomsguide.com, 165. www.tomsguide.com, 166. www.wired.com, 167. www.wired.com, 168. www.wired.com, 169. appleinsider.com, 170. appleinsider.com, 171. www.techradar.com, 172. www.wired.com, 173. www.reddit.com, 174. www.theverge.com, 175. www.theverge.com, 176. www.tomsguide.com, 177. www.tomsguide.com, 178. www.tomsguide.com, 179. www.tomsguide.com, 180. www.aboutamazon.com, 181. www.aboutamazon.com, 182. www.tomsguide.com, 183. www.tomsguide.com, 184. www.whathifi.com, 185. www.whathifi.com, 186. www.stuff.tv, 187. appleinsider.com, 188. www.wired.com, 189. www.wired.com, 190. appleinsider.com, 191. appleinsider.com, 192. www.tomsguide.com