December 19, 2025 — Applied Digital Corporation (NASDAQ: APLD) is back in the spotlight at the end of the week as investors weigh a fresh financing update against a louder, market-wide debate: is the AI data-center boom entering its “credit stress” phase, or is this just another volatility pothole on a long runway?
By mid-day Friday, APLD shares were trading around $25.68, up roughly 7% on the session, after opening near $24.58. That bounce follows a turbulent stretch where the stock has swung sharply on sentiment around leverage, tenant quality, and the cost of capital—core variables for any company building power-hungry AI infrastructure at hyperscale.
Below is a full, up-to-date rundown of the current news, forecasts, and analysis circulating on December 19, 2025, and what it may mean for APLD stock heading into its next earnings update.
What’s driving APLD stock on December 19, 2025
The immediate catalyst is a new development loan facility with Macquarie Group announced Thursday, paired with broader rate-sensitive enthusiasm in risk assets and AI-adjacent names.
Market coverage going into Friday highlighted Applied Digital among notable movers in premarket trading. [1] Meanwhile, Investing.com published a Dec. 19 piece emphasizing the new $100 million facility and tying investor reaction to financing access during a period of heightened scrutiny on debt-funded AI buildouts. [2]
The key point: for Applied Digital, financing is not a footnote—it’s the product. The company’s equity story is tightly linked to whether it can keep funding site development and construction without punitive dilution or prohibitively expensive debt.
The headline news: Applied Digital’s Macquarie development loan facility
On December 18, 2025, Applied Digital announced it entered into a loan facility with Macquarie Group’s Commodities and Global Markets business to fund pre-lease development costs for new data-center projects. [3]
What the company disclosed:
- The facility was entered into by APLD DevCo LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary. [4]
- It’s designed to support early-stage site sourcing, planning, development, and construction for new campuses. [5]
- Applied Digital said it is in advanced-stage negotiations with another investment-grade hyperscaler for multiple campuses, and that the initial $100 million in draws is intended to support development activities tied to those campuses. [6]
- CEO Wes Cummins framed it as a way to move quickly on high-quality sites while maintaining capital flexibility. [7]
- Northland Securities acted as sole placement agent; counsel included Lowenstein Sandler for the company and Latham & Watkins for the lender. [8]
Investing.com’s Dec. 19 coverage reiterated the structure and highlighted the pre-lease nature of the funding—important because pre-lease spending can be a “valley of cash burn” before contracted revenue arrives. [9]
Why this financing matters more than a typical “loan headline”
Applied Digital is building out what it calls AI/HPC-oriented “factory” campuses—massive projects where returns depend on:
- how quickly power becomes available,
- whether tenants ramp on schedule, and
- what the company pays for capital while it waits.
A widely circulated Reuters Breakingviews analysis earlier this month warned that the AI data-center buildout is increasingly sensitive to tenant credit quality and financing conditions, using Applied Digital’s relationship with CoreWeave as an example of how small shifts in interest rates or end valuations can materially impact returns. [10]
In other words, a $100 million development facility is not just liquidity; it’s also a signal to the market that capital partners are still willing to fund the pipeline, even while investors argue about whether the sector is over-levered.
The “hyperscaler” angle: a second big customer, or something larger?
One phrase in the Dec. 18 release did a lot of work: “advanced-stage negotiations with another investment-grade hyperscaler.” [11]
That matters because Applied Digital has already disclosed major deals tied to hyperscale customers:
- CoreWeave lease agreements (15 years, ~$7B): Reuters reported in June that Applied Digital signed two 15-year leases expected to generate about $7 billion in revenue over the term. [12]
- Polaris Forge 2 lease with an investment-grade hyperscaler (~$5B): Reuters reported in October that Applied Digital signed a roughly 15-year lease expected to generate about $5 billion in contracted revenue for 200 MW at its Polaris Forge 2 campus. [13]
So, when Applied Digital now says it’s negotiating with another investment-grade hyperscaler, the market naturally reads that as potential incremental campuses and incremental contracted revenue—the lifeblood of long-duration infrastructure valuation.
That said, the company has not named the counterparty in this latest negotiation. [14]
The other big story this week: AI data-center “leverage jitters”
If you’ve watched APLD for more than five minutes, you’ve seen the pattern: good news hits, shares surge, then macro/credit fears yank the stock back down.
Example: the sharp sell-off earlier in the week
24/7 Wall St. reported that Applied Digital shares plunged roughly 17.5% on December 16 without specific company news, framing the move as part of broader investor discomfort with leverage in AI infrastructure plays. [15]
The same piece pointed to the company’s use of debt financing and highlighted a major debt raise: a $2.35 billion offering of 9.25% senior secured notes due 2030. [16]
Confirming the notes details
Investing.com’s coverage of the related SEC filing describes Applied Digital completing a private offering of $2.35 billion in 9.250% senior secured notes due 2030, issued at 97% of principal, with proceeds earmarked for data-center construction at Ellendale, North Dakota (among other uses). [17]
This is the central tension in the APLD story:
- Bulls see debt as rocket fuel for contracted, long-duration cash flows.
- Bears see debt as gravity, especially if rates stay higher, buildouts slip, or tenants stumble.
Reuters Breakingviews made the broader case: in a world where “neo-cloud” tenants can carry weaker credit profiles than Big Tech hyperscalers, developers can be forced into more expensive financing structures that reduce project returns and amplify downside if execution slips. [18]
Today’s analysis mix: from “bounce” to “still risky”
Coverage around the Macquarie loan facility has been split between “financing unlocks growth” and “financing highlights risk.”
- A Nasdaq-hosted Motley Fool commentary attributed a sharp jump to the Macquarie financing headline and also cited that softer inflation data could benefit rate-sensitive companies by lowering borrowing costs—while still emphasizing the company’s risk from costly debt and/or potential dilution. [19]
- Simply Wall St., in an article dated December 19, 2025, framed the recent pullback as part of “leverage jitters” hitting the sector, arguing the near-term catalyst remains execution—turning signed leases into on-time, on-budget campuses. [20]
Simply Wall St. also published specific longer-term projections in that Dec. 19 piece—$755.7 million revenue and $102.2 million earnings by 2028—while noting wide dispersion in community fair-value estimates. [21]
For a Google News/Discover reader, the practical takeaway is that APLD is being priced as a high-beta infrastructure wager, not a slow-and-steady utility. (Its day-to-day tape agrees.)
Street forecasts: analyst targets, ratings, and what they imply
There is no single “official” Wall Street forecast that everyone follows, but current consensus snapshots help frame expectations.
MarketBeat’s December 18 round-up described:
- A “Moderate Buy” consensus rating (as tracked by MarketBeat)
- An average target price of $26.20, while also listing several higher published targets from firms such as Needham and HC Wainwright (as presented in MarketBeat’s aggregation). [22]
This is one of the more interesting nuances in today’s setup: APLD is trading near the aggregated average target, yet individual targets in some research notes (as summarized by MarketBeat) are substantially higher. [23] That divergence often signals a market that wants more proof—usually in the form of:
- delivery milestones,
- confirmed tenant ramps, and
- more clarity on financing terms and returns.
Positioning indicators: short interest and options “expected move” signals
Short interest remains elevated
MarketBeat reported that as of Nov. 28, 2025, Applied Digital had 80.34 million shares sold short, representing 31.87% of the public float, with about 3.0 days to cover. [24]
High short interest can amplify moves in either direction:
- Positive catalysts can trigger forced buying (short covering).
- Negative surprises can accelerate declines as longs de-risk.
Options imply continued turbulence
Fintel pegged APLD’s 30-day options-implied volatility at about 114% (as of Dec. 18 data on its page). [25]
Implied volatility is not a directional forecast—it’s the options market’s way of saying: “We expect this thing to keep moving a lot.”
Operations and execution: what investors are watching on the ground
Applied Digital’s bull case depends on construction and energization milestones translating into billable capacity.
A November 24 company update (republished via StockTitan) said the company achieved Ready for Service for the second phase at the first 100 MW building of its Polaris Forge 1 campus, bringing that building to full 100 MW critical IT load and marking completion of the first of three contracted buildings at the campus. [26]
That sort of milestone matters because “AI factories” don’t monetize when they’re ideas—they monetize when they’re powered, cooled, and occupied.
Next catalyst: Applied Digital’s upcoming earnings date
Applied Digital announced it will report fiscal second-quarter results (quarter ended Nov. 30, 2025) after the market close on Wednesday, Jan. 7, 2026, followed by a conference call at 5:00 p.m. ET. [27]
For APLD stock, earnings calls tend to matter less for classic quarterly “beats/misses” and more for:
- buildout timelines,
- funding status,
- tenant updates,
- power availability, and
- how management frames the cost of capital.
Putting it together: the bull case vs. the bear case (as of Dec. 19, 2025)
The bullish narrative (why the stock can keep working)
- Access to capital for pipeline expansion: the new Macquarie development facility is positioned as enabling faster site development aligned with demand. [28]
- Large, long-duration contracted revenue potential: prior lease announcements (including the ~$7B CoreWeave leases and the ~$5B hyperscaler lease) suggest substantial contracted revenue if projects are delivered. [29]
- Execution milestones are landing: the Polaris Forge 1 100 MW building reaching full capacity is a tangible “steel-in-the-ground” datapoint. [30]
The bearish narrative (why volatility and downside risk remain real)
- Debt and refinancing sensitivity: the company’s capital structure—highlighted by the $2.35B senior secured notes—raises the stakes of flawless execution. [31]
- Sector-wide credit concerns: analysis has pointed to potential fragility in AI infrastructure economics if financing costs rise or tenant credit perceptions deteriorate. [32]
- Positioning can cut both ways: high short interest and high implied volatility can magnify downside on negative surprises as easily as they can fuel upside on good news. [33]
Bottom line for APLD stock on December 19, 2025
Applied Digital is trading like what it is: a high-growth, capital-intensive AI infrastructure builder whose stock reacts sharply to two inputs—financing access and execution confidence.
The Macquarie development loan facility is being treated as a constructive headline because it suggests continued funding support while Applied Digital pursues additional hyperscaler-scale campuses. [34] But the market is also sending a clear message that leverage and tenant/credit narratives can overwhelm the tape quickly—something underscored by the week’s sharp pullback analysis and broader commentary on AI data-center credit dynamics. [35]
With the next earnings event set for January 7, 2026, the near-term question for investors is less “Is AI big?” and more “Will the buildouts stay on schedule, and will the next financing steps come at acceptable cost?” [36]
References
1. www.barrons.com, 2. au.investing.com, 3. www.globenewswire.com, 4. www.globenewswire.com, 5. www.globenewswire.com, 6. www.globenewswire.com, 7. www.globenewswire.com, 8. www.globenewswire.com, 9. au.investing.com, 10. www.reuters.com, 11. www.globenewswire.com, 12. www.reuters.com, 13. www.reuters.com, 14. www.globenewswire.com, 15. 247wallst.com, 16. 247wallst.com, 17. www.investing.com, 18. www.reuters.com, 19. www.nasdaq.com, 20. simplywall.st, 21. simplywall.st, 22. www.marketbeat.com, 23. www.marketbeat.com, 24. www.marketbeat.com, 25. fintel.io, 26. www.stocktitan.net, 27. www.globenewswire.com, 28. www.globenewswire.com, 29. www.reuters.com, 30. www.stocktitan.net, 31. www.investing.com, 32. www.reuters.com, 33. www.marketbeat.com, 34. www.globenewswire.com, 35. 247wallst.com, 36. www.globenewswire.com


