Today: 21 July 2026
Browse Category

NYSE:JNJ 30 January 2026 - 15 February 2026

Johnson & Johnson stock price holds near $238 after-hours as Supreme Court talc case move hits

Johnson & Johnson stock price holds near $238 after-hours as Supreme Court talc case move hits

Johnson & Johnson shares jumped about 1.4% Thursday, then held steady after hours. The move came as the company asked the U.S. Supreme Court to weigh in on whether a shareholder lawsuit accusing it of misleading statements about talc safety can move forward as a class action. The petition seeks clarification on the court’s 2021 Goldman Sachs ruling, focusing on how “price impact” — whether alleged falsehoods affected stock prices — factors into certifying investor groups. JNJ last changed hands at $237.79, after trading between $233.33 and $240.00 during regular hours.
Johnson & Johnson stock: Talc-court twist and EU drug nod set up next week

Johnson & Johnson stock: Talc-court twist and EU drug nod set up next week

Johnson & Johnson shares edged down 3 cents to $227.25 on Friday after a U.S. judge dismissed a lawsuit accusing the company of fraud related to its talc bankruptcy approach. The plaintiffs claimed J&J employed a “Texas two-step,” moving talc liabilities into a subsidiary that filed for bankruptcy to stall cancer lawsuits. Judge Michael Shipp ruled they hadn’t proven any real harm caused by the delay. J&J’s litigation head Erik Haas slammed the claims as “wholly meritless,” while the plaintiffs’ attorney said they’re considering an appeal.
Johnson & Johnson stock barely moved — but a talc ruling and EU drug nod are in focus

Johnson & Johnson stock barely moved — but a talc ruling and EU drug nod are in focus

Johnson & Johnson shares closed nearly flat Friday following Michael Shipp’s dismissal of a fraud lawsuit tied to the company’s failed talc-bankruptcy plan. The stock ended at $227.25, slipping just 0.01% after fluctuating between $225.34 and $228.40 throughout the session. Erik Haas labeled the allegations “wholly meritless,” while plaintiffs’ attorney Patricia Kipnis said she’s reviewing the ruling with clients to consider an appeal.
1 2 3 4 9
Go toTop