Cleveland-Cliffs Stock (NYSE: CLF) Slides After S&P Downgrade: Latest News, Forecasts, and Analyst Views for December 12, 2025

Cleveland-Cliffs (CLF) shares fell on Dec. 12, 2025 after S&P cut its credit rating to B+. Here’s what the downgrade means, what Wall Street forecasts suggest, and the key catalysts investors are watching into 2026.

Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. (NYSE: CLF) is back in the spotlight on Friday, December 12, 2025 , after a credit-rating downgrade helped push the steelmaker’s shares lower—even as the stock remains a major talking point in the US materials sector following a strong 2025 run.

By mid-session, CLF stock traded around $12.8, down roughly 4% on the day , with trading ranging from about $12.57 to $13.50 .

What’s driving the move? A combination of balance-sheet concerns , market expectations for a 2026 earnings rebound , and renewed debate over whether Cleveland-Cliffs’ rally has gotten ahead of its fundamentals.

Below is a comprehensive roundup of the news flow published today (12/12/2025) , plus the most-cited forecasts and analyzes currently shaping sentiment around Cleveland-Cliffs stock.

What happened to Cleveland-Cliffs stock today

CLF shares weakened on Friday after S&P Global Ratings downgraded Cleveland-Cliffs to “B+” from “BB-,” citing elevated leverage and a more stressed credit profile than the agency previously expected. ^[1]

In practical terms for equity investors, the day’s selloff reflects a familiar market pattern:

Bad credit news can hit the stock because it raises questions about refinancing costs and financial flexibility.
Even “stable outlook” language can be read two ways —either “stabilizing from here” or “stabilizing at a riskier level,” depending on how quickly earnings recover.

The move is especially notable because CLF entered the day after a higher prior close (the finance tape implies a prior close around $13.41 ).

The headline on 12/12/2025: S&P downgrades Cleveland-Cliffs to B+ on leverage

According to coverage published Friday, S&P’s downgrade centers on one theme: debt and leverage staying too high for too long .

Key points reported from the S&P rationale include:

Debt-to-EBITDA deterioration: S&P cited a jump in debt-to-EBITDA to about 20.5x in fiscal 2024 , up from about 2.3x in fiscal 2023 , tied to acquisition-related debt and weaker market conditions. ^[2]
Steel-market pressure: S&P pointed to weak demand and lower hot-rolled coil (HRC) pricing , with HRC averaging roughly $770/ton vs. $920/ton the year before (per the report summary). ^[3]
Debt level: S&P flagged adjusted debt of roughly $8.4 billion (as of Dec. 5, 2025, per the published summary). ^[4]
Outlook = stable, but not “all clear”: The stable outlook was described as reflecting expectations that leverage improves into roughly the 5x–6x range over the next 12 months , supported by a recovery in earnings and cost actions. ^[5]

The part bulls are watching: S&P’s 2026 earnings recovery view

The same coverage also reported S&P expects a meaningful rebound in profitability, with 2026 adjusted EBITDA forecast in a range of roughly $1.3 billion to $1.7 billion (while 2025 was described as around breakeven to ~$100 million). ^[6]

That forecast matters because Cleveland-Cliffs is a cyclical operator: the equity story can change quickly when steel spreads and volumes turn.

A near-term operational positive: end of a low-margin slab contract

Another detail highlighted Friday: Cleveland-Cliffs reportedly ended a low-margin slab supply contract with ArcelorMittal on Dec. 9, 2025 , and S&P expects the company could generate about $500 million of annual EBITDA by selling those slabs at higher US pricing. ^[7]

Why the downgrade matters to CLF shareholders (even if you don’t own the bonds)

Credit ratings can feel “bond-only,” but they affect stock investors through a few direct channels:

Cost of capital: Lower ratings can translate to higher yields demanded by lenders and bond investors, especially when refinancing windows open.
Strategic flexibility: The more cash that goes to interest expense and debt reduction, the less is available for growth capex, share repurchases, or opportunistic acquisitions.
Dilution risk: When leverage is high, equity raises become a more realistic tool—especially if management wants to protect liquidity.

Cleveland-Cliffs has already shown it will use equity markets when it makes sense. In late October 2025, the company priced a public offering of 75,000,000 common shares , targeting about $964 million in gross proceeds, and stated it intended to use proceeds to repay borrowings under its asset-based credit facility (with any remainder for general corporate purposes). ^[8]

For today’s market, that history cuts both ways:

It demonstrates access to capital.
It also reminds investors that share count can rise when management prioritizes balance-sheet repair.

Wall Street forecasts: “Hold” consensus, but a wide price-target range

On the equity-research side, today’s Cleveland-Cliffs conversation is less about a single new rating note and more about where consensus sits right now:

Consensus rating: Hold (based on 10 analysts in the last 12 months, per one widely followed aggregation).
Consensus 12-month price target: about $12.78 , with a high of $17.00 and a low of $5.75 . ^[9]

This spread is important. A low target in the mid-single digits and a high target in the high teens tells you analysts see Cleveland-Cliffs as high beta to the steel cycle —and highly sensitive to how quickly earnings normalize versus how long leverage stays elevated.

Another major market-data provider lists an average target price around $11.97 (with 16 ratings shown). ^[10]

What to take from this: even after a big 2025 move, the “Street view” is not uniformly bullish or bearish—it’s conditional.

Valuation debate on 12/12/2025: is CLF still attractive after the 2025 rally?

A separate analysis published today argues that the stock’s 2025 surge has made valuation more controversial.

One valuation framework published on Dec. 12 suggests:

A discounted cash flow approach implies an intrinsic value around $8.75 , describing the shares as overvalued by ~53% at the time of writing. ^[11]
At the same time, the same analysis notes other measures (like price-to-sales comparisons) can point the opposite direction, and it highlights how assumptions around cash flow normalization drive dramatically different “fair value” outcomes. ^[12]

It also underscores the cyclicality problem: Cleveland-Cliffs showed roughly -$1.53 billion in leveraged free cash flow over the last twelve months in that dataset, with expectations that cash flow improves over time. ^[13]

Whether you agree with that conclusion or not, it reflects today’s reality: CLF is not being priced like a steady compounder —it’s being priced like a leveraged cyclical where timing and operating leverage matter.

Another item in today’s news flow: institutional activity around CLF

Alongside the downgrade headlines, another story circulating today focuses on ownership and positioning.

A MarketBeat report published Friday says Maple Rock Capital Partners disclosed a sizable position— 8,385,600 shares , valued around $63.7 million —and notes institutional ownership around 67.68% . ^[14]

Institutional flows don’t “explain” daily moves by themselves, but they do matter for Cleveland-Cliffs because:

High institutional ownership can amplify volatility during macro rotations (materials risk-on/risk-off).
Big holders can become catalysts if they increase positions on weakness—or reduce exposure when debt risk headlines appear.

Cleveland-Cliffs fundamentals: what the company has been emphasizing

While today’s market reaction is credit-driven, the bull case Cleveland-Cliffs has been selling in 2025 centers on automotive steel demand , pricing/mix , and trade dynamics .

In its third-quarter 2025 release, Cleveland-Cliffs reported:

Steel shipments: 4.0 million net tones
Revenue: $4.7 billion
Adjusted EBITDA: $143 million
Liquidity: $3.1 billion (as of Sept. 30, 2025) ^[15]

Management also highlighted:

Demand recovery for automotive-grade steel , and said it had won multi-year supply arrangements with major automotive OEMs. ^[16]

Reuters’ coverage of that quarter similarly noted the narrower-than-expected loss and referenced management comments about multi-year agreements and improving automotive exposure under the prevailing US trade environment. ^[17]

Strategic optionality: the POSCO MoU

Another forward-looking element is the company’s disclosed Memorandum of Understanding with POSCO. Cleveland-Cliffs said it expects a formal announcement on a definitive agreement in Q4 2025 or Q1 2026 , with closing expected in 2026 (subject to definitive terms and customary uncertainties). ^[18]

Stelco acquisition: the strategic rationale versus the balance-sheet hangover

Today’s downgrade story can’t be separated from Cleveland-Cliffs’ acquisition track record—particularly Stelco.

Reuters reported in 2024 that Cleveland-Cliffs agreed to buy Stelco for C$3.85 billion (about $2.8 billion) , combining cash and stock consideration. ^[19]
Cleveland-Cliffs later announced it completed the Stelco acquisition on Nov. 1, 2024 , emphasizing scale in flat-rolled steel and expanded Canadian footprint. ^[20]

The investment question investors are asking in late 2025 is straightforward:

If the cycle improves, Stelco can look like a well-timed capacity and footprint expansion.
If pricing and volumes stay soft, the same deal can look like the reason leverage remains restrictive.

S&P’s downgrade suggests the rating agency believes the second risk is still too prominent—at least for now. ^[21]

What investors are watching next

With the Dec. 12 downgrade and the market’s immediate reaction, the next “checkpoints” for Cleveland-Cliffs stock are likely to be:

Deleveraging progress: net debt trends, working capital normalization, and any additional asset sales or equity actions.
Steel pricing and contract resets: whether US sheet pricing stabilizes and whether contract repricing supports margins (especially in automotive).
Execution on the post-ArcelorMittal slab strategy: whether the expected margin uplift materials. ^[22]
Any formal update on the POSCO partnership timeline: the company has pointed to Q4 2025 / Q1 2026 for a definitive agreement announcement target, with closing expected in 2026. ^[23]

Earnings date: still not confirmed by the company

Cleveland-Cliffs’ IR calendar page currently shows no upcoming events scheduled . ^[24]
However, third-party calendars estimate the next report could land in late February 2026 (estimates vary by provider). ^[25]

Bottom line for December 12, 2025

Cleveland-Cliffs stock is trading the classic leveraged-cyclical narrative today:

The bad news: S&P downgraded CLF to B+ on leverage concerns, reinforcing that the balance sheet remains the market’s central risk. ^[26]
The offset: the same coverage points to a 2026 earnings recovery scenario, and operational levers like improved slab economics. ^[27]
The market reality: analysts sit at “Hold” on average, but targets range widely—because the next 12 months hinge on the steel cycle and debt trajectory. ^[28]