Ford Stock Plunges Amid $1B Supplier Fire, EV Slump & Record Recalls – What’s Next?

Ford Stock Plunges Amid $1B Supplier Fire, EV Slump & Record Recalls – What’s Next?

  • Current Stock Price: Ford (NYSE: F) shares were about $11.9 at the Oct. 17 close [1]. The stock spiked earlier in 2025 to near $12 but fell ~6–7% on Oct. 7 after news of a major supplier fire [2] [3]. Year-to-date the stock is still up roughly 20–25%, largely on strong truck sales earlier in the year [4] [5].
  • Supplier Fire Impact: A Sept. 16 blaze at Novelis’s aluminum plant (Oswego, NY) – a key F-150 supplier – is expected to idle the factory into Q1 2026. Evercore analysts estimate the fire could shave $0.5–$1.0 billion off Ford’s 2025 profit [6] [7]. Ford’s stock “fell about 6%” immediately after the fire news [8].
  • Massive Recalls: On Oct. 17 Ford announced a recall of ~625,000 U.S. vehicles to fix seatbelt and rear-view camera defects [9]. In total, Ford had issued 109 safety recalls in 2025 (over three times any rival), on track to be its worst year ever [10]. Regulators even fined Ford $165 million this year for slow recall execution [11].
  • EV Business in Red: Ford’s Model e unit lost roughly $1.3 billion in Q2 2025 (about ~$22,000 burned per EV sold) [12]. U.S. EV sales plunged 31% YoY in Q2 2025, and Ford’s EV market share is only ~5% (a distant #3 behind Tesla and GM) [13]. The company has begun trimming EV plans – cutting ~1,000 jobs at its Cologne, Germany plant and delaying new EV lines [14] – and is relying on price cuts/discounts on models like the F-150 Lightning, which has been slower to ramp up than hoped [15].
  • Core Truck Strength: In contrast, gas-powered pickups and SUVs remain Ford’s lifeline. Third-quarter U.S. vehicle sales jumped 8.2% to 545,522 units (driven by F-Series trucks, Broncos and Mavericks) [16]. Robust demand for these models generates strong cash flow [17] and supports Ford’s generous dividend (recently yielding ~5–6%) [18]. This core profit engine funds R&D and cushions Ford’s financials.
  • Labor & Policy: Ford secured a 4-year UAW contract in late 2023, avoiding recent strikes [19], and hired Boeing veteran Mike Fitzsimmons in Sept. as VP of Global Labor [20] to bolster labor relations. In trade policy, the (new) U.S. administration on Oct. 17 enacted a 3.75% credit for U.S.-built autos/engines (through 2030) while imposing a 25% tariff on imported heavy trucks from Nov. 1 [21]. This mix favors domestic production (helping Ford’s U.S. plants) but could raise costs on vehicles or parts made abroad [22].
  • Analyst Consensus: Wall Street is mostly cautious. Of ~17 analysts, 13 rate F “Hold” and only a couple are bullish [23]. The average 12-month price target is roughly $11–$11.5 – slightly below the current share price – implying limited near-term upside [24] [25]. For example, MarketBeat cites a consensus target around $11.04 [26], and TipRanks shows a mean target of $11.32 [27]. The high/low range of targets spans about $15.50 down to $7.00 [28] [29]. Overall, analysts say Ford’s valuation is undemanding (~15× earnings [30]) given its legacy assets (brands, fleet, financing arm) [31], but they note the company must prove its EV strategy and quality fixes to justify higher forecasts.

Stock Performance in Recent Days

Ford’s shares have been on a roller-coaster. After rallying near 52-week highs (around $12.00+ in late summer), the stock tumbled in early October on a cascade of bad news. As of the Oct. 17 close, Ford stock was about $11.92 [32]. Analysts note the stock remains roughly 20–30% higher YTD [33], but volatility spiked after the aluminum-plant fire on Oct. 6 and the recall announcements. Trading volume has been unusually high (averaging >50 million shares/day in mid-Oct) [34], reflecting frantic buy/sell activity.

Despite the swings, Ford looks “relatively cheap,” with a trailing P/E under 15 – below the auto-industry average [35]. Most brokerage firms carry a “Hold” rating. For instance, UBS just set a 12-month target of $12.50 (only ~5% above current levels) [36], and Jefferies recently raised its target to $12 after upgrading its view [37]. (By contrast, Goldman Sachs earlier in 2025 trimmed its Ford target to $9 amid tariff and warranty pressures [38].) In short, few analysts see a quick upside – Wall Street consensus is flat-to-down without clear new catalysts [39] [40].

Supplier Fire and Recall Impact

In mid-September, Ford was blindsided by a major supplier fire. A late-night blaze on Sept. 16 at Novelis’s Oswego, NY aluminum plant (Ford’s primary F-150 sheet supplier) is expected to idle operations until early 2026 [41]. Evercore ISI warned the hit could reach $0.5–$1 billion in 2025 earnings [42] [43]. Ford confirmed it is working closely with Novelis to find alternatives, but even so the stock “fell about 6%” on Oct. 7 as investors priced in the disruption [44] [45]. This fire compounds a supply-chain squeeze at a time of higher metals costs and staffing pressures.

The fire news coincided with a surge in safety recalls. On Oct. 17, Ford announced a recall of ~625,000 U.S. vehicles over seatbelt and rear-view camera display defects [46]. That included a massive Mustang seatbelt replacement and software fixes for Super Duty trucks. TechStock² notes 2025 will likely be Ford’s worst-ever recall year: 109 recalls in the U.S. so far, more than triple any rival [47]. Regulators have even slapped Ford with a $165 million penalty for slow recall execution [48]. CEO Jim Farley has acknowledged these quality issues publicly, calling defect reduction a “multi-year” top priority [49].

EV Challenges and Core Truck Strength

Ford’s electric-vehicle plans have cooled off dramatically. The Model e division lost about $1.3 billion in Q2 2025 [50], roughly $22,000 per EV sold. U.S. EV sales fell 31% year-over-year in Q2 [51] (partly due to the end of the federal $7,500 tax credit on Sept. 30). Ford’s EV share is only ~5.3% [52], and the company has responded by curbing investment. It plans to cut roughly 1,000 jobs at its Cologne EV plant and has delayed new EV assembly lines [53]. Even the F-150 Lightning has been discounted and produced more slowly than expected [54]. Without a rebound in demand (or new incentives), analysts worry Ford’s EV business will remain a drag into 2026.

On the bright side, Ford’s traditional gasoline-powered trucks and SUVs continue to sell briskly. In Q3, U.S. sales of F-Series pickups, Broncos and Mavericks jumped 8.2% to ~545,500 units [55]. Ford even boosted production of its hottest models to keep up with demand [56]. That franchise generates ample cash flow, which is funding Ford’s dividend (yield ~5–6%) [57] and EV investments. In Q3, Ford’s gas-engine divisions delivered roughly $3.4 billion EBIT [58], helping to absorb losses elsewhere. In sum, Ford’s legacy truck business remains solid – a critical offset to the EV woes.

Earnings Outlook

Ford will report its Q3 2025 results on Oct. 23 (after markets close). Analysts expect roughly $0.38 EPS on ~$43.1 billion revenue [59], essentially flat to last year’s Q3 ($0.37) [60] [61]. (In Q2, Ford beat estimates with $0.37 EPS on $50.18B sales [62].) Ford is guiding to about $6.5–$7.5 billion operating income in 2025 [63], down from earlier plans. The company says it is targeting roughly $1.00 EPS in 2025 and $2.00 in 2026 [64], but those outlooks assume recovery in both the EV and global auto markets.

Aside from the fire and recalls, Ford’s executives are watching costs closely. Higher steel/aluminum prices and tariffs have pressured margins; any easing would help. The recent US auto policy (tax credit/ tariffs) is expected to boost domestic vehicle profitability on one hand, but could raise costs on imported parts [65]. Conversely, higher interest rates could dampen consumer demand for all vehicles (EVs and ICE) [66]. Overall, Wall Street notes that Ford’s balance sheet and cash flow generation remain relatively healthy, but the stock will hinge on the near-term surprises (up or down) around these headwinds [67] [68].

Labor and Policy Context

Unlike last year’s Detroit strikes, Ford’s labor situation is calm. A new four-year UAW contract (negotiated in late 2023) has secured work peace through 2027 [69]. To reinforce that, Ford hired Mike Fitzsimmons (ex-Boeing contract negotiator) in Sept. to head global labor relations [70]. This gives Ford some breathing room as it retools plants for EV production. The next UAW contract isn’t due until 2028, reducing short-term strike risk [71].

On the policy front, the U.S. is rolling out incentives for domestic auto production. The Oct. 17 order (by President Trump in this timeline) grants a 3.75% credit on U.S.-assembled cars and engines through 2030 [72] [73]. This effectively makes Ford’s Michigan-made vehicles more profitable. At the same time, a new 25% tariff on imported medium/heavy trucks (from Nov. 1) was announced [74] [75]. Since Ford builds most of its heavy trucks (like the F-250/350) domestically but imports some components, the net effect is mixed: it generally protects Ford’s high-volume U.S. production, but could increase costs on any models or parts sourced abroad. In all, experts say these policy moves introduce more complexity – slightly favoring Ford’s domestic output but adding uncertainty on costs [76] [77].

Analyst Commentary and Forecast

Wall Street’s view of Ford is split but cautious. Analysts point out Ford’s “undemanding” valuation (~15× earnings [78]) and its dominant position in trucks. Bulls highlight Ford’s strong brands, balance sheet, cash flow and generous dividends. Bears counter that EV losses, quality problems and new tariffs could erode profits. Indeed, Ford’s consensus rating is “Hold” [79]. For example, Jefferies upgraded Ford to Hold on Oct. 6 and raised its 12-month price target to $12 [80], citing potential upside if the EV cycle recovers. By contrast, Goldman Sachs (in April 2025) cut its target to $9, pointing to tariff and warranty pressures [81]. Retail brokerage data (Public.com) shows roughly 70% of analysts at Hold vs. 8% at Buy and 15% at Sell [82].

The average forecast reflects skepticism: MarketBeat reports a consensus 12-month target around $11.0 (about a 7% downside) [83], and TipRanks shows a mean target of $11.32 (~5% below current) [84]. In other words, most analysts see only limited upside unless Ford can deliver on EV improvements and cost controls.

Looking ahead, analysts say clear near-term catalysts are scarce. If Ford beats Q3 estimates or reports meaningful cost cuts (especially in EV), the stock could get a short-lived rally. But any new negative surprise (another big recall, a supply hit, or slowing truck demand) would likely send shares lower. Longer-term (2026+), Ford’s fate hinges on the EV turnaround and broader economy. Some forecasters remain mildly optimistic: for instance, 247WallSt recently noted Ford’s “expected earnings power” and shareholder-friendly buybacks as positives [85]. Others argue we should remain cautious “until Ford proves it can execute flawlessly and compete effectively in the EV era” [86].

Sources: Data and analysis are drawn from Ford’s filings and quotes, Reuters and MarketBeat reports, and recent TechStock² (ts2.tech) news articles [87] [88] [89] [90] [91]. All information is current as of Oct. 19, 2025.

Former Ford CEO: EV market didn't develop the way automakers thought

References

1. ts2.tech, 2. www.reuters.com, 3. ts2.tech, 4. ts2.tech, 5. ts2.tech, 6. www.reuters.com, 7. ts2.tech, 8. www.reuters.com, 9. www.reuters.com, 10. ts2.tech, 11. ts2.tech, 12. ts2.tech, 13. ts2.tech, 14. ts2.tech, 15. ts2.tech, 16. ts2.tech, 17. ts2.tech, 18. ts2.tech, 19. ts2.tech, 20. ts2.tech, 21. ts2.tech, 22. ts2.tech, 23. ts2.tech, 24. www.marketbeat.com, 25. www.tipranks.com, 26. www.marketbeat.com, 27. www.tipranks.com, 28. www.marketbeat.com, 29. www.tipranks.com, 30. ts2.tech, 31. ts2.tech, 32. ts2.tech, 33. ts2.tech, 34. ts2.tech, 35. ts2.tech, 36. ts2.tech, 37. ts2.tech, 38. ts2.tech, 39. ts2.tech, 40. ts2.tech, 41. www.reuters.com, 42. www.reuters.com, 43. ts2.tech, 44. www.reuters.com, 45. ts2.tech, 46. www.reuters.com, 47. ts2.tech, 48. ts2.tech, 49. ts2.tech, 50. ts2.tech, 51. ts2.tech, 52. ts2.tech, 53. ts2.tech, 54. ts2.tech, 55. ts2.tech, 56. ts2.tech, 57. ts2.tech, 58. ts2.tech, 59. ts2.tech, 60. ts2.tech, 61. ts2.tech, 62. ts2.tech, 63. ts2.tech, 64. ts2.tech, 65. ts2.tech, 66. ts2.tech, 67. ts2.tech, 68. ts2.tech, 69. ts2.tech, 70. ts2.tech, 71. ts2.tech, 72. ts2.tech, 73. ts2.tech, 74. ts2.tech, 75. ts2.tech, 76. ts2.tech, 77. ts2.tech, 78. ts2.tech, 79. ts2.tech, 80. ts2.tech, 81. ts2.tech, 82. ts2.tech, 83. www.marketbeat.com, 84. www.tipranks.com, 85. ts2.tech, 86. ts2.tech, 87. www.reuters.com, 88. www.reuters.com, 89. ts2.tech, 90. ts2.tech, 91. ts2.tech

A technology and finance expert writing for TS2.tech. He analyzes developments in satellites, telecommunications, and artificial intelligence, with a focus on their impact on global markets. Author of industry reports and market commentary, often cited in tech and business media. Passionate about innovation and the digital economy.

Marsh CEO Slams Rivals’ “Unlawful” Hiring Blitz as Shares Slide
Previous Story

Marsh CEO Slams Rivals’ “Unlawful” Hiring Blitz as Shares Slide

Plug Power Stock Skyrockets on Hydrogen Hype – Bubble or Breakout?
Next Story

Plug Power Stock Skyrockets on Hydrogen Hype – Bubble or Breakout?

Stock Market Today

  • Buffett Sells Apple Stock, Bets on Domino's Pizza After 6,500% IPO Run
    October 19, 2025, 8:28 AM EDT. Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway has remained a notable Apple holder, but the latest move highlights a stake in Domino's Pizza (DPZ). Domino's has produced more than a 6,500% total return since its IPO in 2004. Berkshire owns about 2.6 million shares, roughly 7.75% of the company. Domino's case rests on a scalable franchise model that lowers capital needs, a digital-first ordering platform, and an efficient supply chain that standardizes costs and quality. Its global footprint-over 21,750 locations-supports continued growth. While pizza remains a low-barrier business, Domino's size and ability to tailor menus to local tastes help sustain its competitive advantages and potential for durable returns.
  • Hecla Mining's 27% Rally Masks Elevated P/S Relative to Peers
    October 19, 2025, 8:26 AM EDT. Hecla Mining Company has jumped about 27% in the last month, lifting its yearly gain to around 91%. Yet the rally leaves a P/S ratio of 8.8x, well above the Metals & Mining group, many peers trade under 3.1x or even sub-0.6x. Revenue momentum has been solid, rising 36% last year and 40% over three years, but analysts expect about 13% revenue growth next year, below the broader industry's ~19% forecast. That gap helps explain the elevated valuation, which appears driven by investor sentiment as much as fundamentals. If growth slows, the current P/S may come under pressure. The takeaway: be cautious about assuming the fuel behind the stock's move will persist, even as Hecla Mining benefits from recent top-line strength.
  • Williams Companies, Inc. (NYSE:WMB) Fair Value Near Market Price in Two-Stage DCF
    October 19, 2025, 8:24 AM EDT. Using a two-stage DCF model, Simply Wall St estimates Williams Companies' fair value at US$68.22 per share. With the stock trading around US$62.46 today, the market looks near fair value. Analysts' target price of US$66.94 implies a ~1.9% discount to the fair value estimate. The analysis walks through forecasting 10 years of levered free cash flow and discounting back to present value, followed by a conservative terminal value assumption. The model yields a Present Value of Cash Flows (PVCF) around US$27 billion, supporting a view that Williams remains fairly priced but not pricing in a significant mispricing. Investors should consider DCF assumptions, growth pace, and the balance between dividends and capital returns when assessing WMB.
  • Two Historic Valuation Signals Warn of Market Risk in 2026: Buffett Indicator at 219% and Shiller CAPE
    October 19, 2025, 8:20 AM EDT. Two long-standing gauges warn that stock valuations are stretched. The Buffett indicator-total market cap relative to GDP-has climbed to an all-time high near 219%, a level Buffett warned would be 'playing with fire.' The metric has preceded sharp pullbacks during past bubbles, including 1999-2000 and the 2022 peak preceding a bear market. The other measure, the Shiller CAPE ratio, averages inflation-adjusted earnings over a decade and has spiked before major declines in 1929, 2000, and again around 2021. Taken together, these signals suggest elevated risk for equities and a potential pullback, even as prices sit near record highs. Investors should balance these warnings with fundamentals, valuations relative to rates, and a plan for risk management, since no indicator guarantees a crash or timing.
  • Validea ETF Fundamental Report: SPDR Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF)
    October 19, 2025, 8:18 AM EDT. Validea's ETF fundamental report covers SPDR Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF). The ETF is classified as a Large-Cap Momentum fund, with its largest exposure in the Financial sector and the top industry being Investment Services. On-factor scores range from 1 to 99, signaling the ETF's tilt across key investing factors: Momentum 90, Low Volatility 70, Value 67, and Quality 64. The standout attribute is a high momentum tilt, complemented by solid low-volatility characteristics, while value and quality scores indicate moderate valuations and earnings durability. The report reflects Validea's methodology, drawing on published strategies to evaluate how XLF aligns with broader investing factors and sector concentration.
Go toTop