PANAMA CITY, Jan 15, 2026, 10:04 (EST)
- The Panama Supreme Court is set to issue a ruling soon on the challenge to CK Hutchison’s canal-port concession.
- Ruling may upend a $23 billion global ports deal intended for a BlackRock-led consortium
- Cosco’s bid for control has intensified pressure on the talks
Panama’s Supreme Court is set to deliver a ruling soon on lawsuits aiming to cancel CK Hutchison’s licence for two ports at the Panama Canal’s Atlantic and Pacific gateways. The decision threatens to upend the group’s $23 billion ports sale to a consortium led by BlackRock and Mediterranean Shipping Co (MSC). Plaintiffs reference audits claiming the state lost up to $1.3 billion under the 2021 concession renewal. Officials say they have backup plans, noting roughly 5% of global trade flows through the canal.
The case has turned into both a political and commercial headache. The canal acts as a choke point, while the ports serve as a transshipment hub—where containers shift from one vessel to another—putting continuity at the top of the list for shipping lines and cargo owners.
For CK Hutchison, the Panama terminals represent the most delicate piece of a broader deal covering 43 ports across 23 countries. The buyers demand an unambiguous route to regulatory approvals. Now, Panama’s courts and political landscape factor heavily into the timeline.
Private lawyers and Panama’s comptroller are pushing the Supreme Court to annul the concession, arguing it breaches the constitution and hurts taxpayers. A government audit cited in the lawsuit estimates lost revenue could reach $1.3 billion. Hutchison grabbed the 25-year license in the late 1990s after outbidding U.S. engineering giant Bechtel, then secured a renewal for another 25 years in 2021. “Hutchison’s relationship with Panamanian society over the past decades has been very tense and difficult,” said Finance Minister Felipe Chapman. Adviser Alberto Alemán added, “The continuity of operations is fundamental for the transshipment industry worldwide.” (Wall Street Journal)
Kuehne+Nagel’s myKN platform revealed that MSC and BlackRock are rethinking the acquisition after China’s state-owned Cosco insisted on a controlling stake — majority ownership — in the buyer consortium. Earlier plans to leave out the Panama Canal terminals are still unresolved, it added, while regulators in Europe are scrutinizing a separate MSC-BlackRock deal linked to a Barcelona port terminal.
Trans.info, referencing the Financial Times, reported that Cosco is pushing for majority control and stronger governance rights. BlackRock and MSC are reportedly considering pulling out rather than agreeing to these conditions. So far, none of CK Hutchison, BlackRock, MSC, or Cosco have made any public statements about the new demands or the status of talks.
The deal, already caught up in geopolitical tensions, now hinges on a court ruling in Panama. Officials are focused not only on terminal ownership but also on how quickly cargo operations can resume if the contract falls apart.
CK Hutchison is pushing ahead with plans to unlock value elsewhere. Reuters reported Thursday that the conglomerate is gauging investor interest for a dual listing of its retail arm A.S. Watson in Hong Kong and London, aiming for a valuation near $30 billion.
The legal battle in Panama remains a wildcard. Should the Supreme Court annul the concession, the Panama terminals might pull out of the $23 billion deal or trigger a restructuring and repricing. Even if the court backs the contract, calls for renegotiation could persist. In either scenario, uncertainty about terminal management threatens to stall investment plans that rely on steady, long-term commitments.
Right now, shippers, investors, and governments are all interpreting the same signals—but coming away with different conclusions. A ruling expected soon might end the court case, or simply shift the battle to another arena.
