WASHINGTON — The John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts, one of the nation’s most prominent cultural institutions, is set to carry President Donald Trump’s name after the center’s board voted Thursday to rename it the “Trump‑Kennedy Center,” according to the White House. [1]
White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt announced the decision on social media, framing the move as recognition for what she described as Trump’s work “saving the building” — citing renovations, finances, and the institution’s reputation. [2]
The vote instantly reignited a months-long debate that has swirled around Trump’s takeover of the Kennedy Center’s governance and programming: can the board actually rename a congressionally established memorial venue without lawmakers’ approval, and what does the rebranding mean for an arts complex that has traditionally tried to stand above partisan politics? [3]
What happened on Dec. 18: the board vote and the White House announcement
The Associated Press reported that Trump’s “handpicked board” voted Thursday to rename Washington’s leading performing arts center the “Trump‑Kennedy Center,” with Leavitt making the announcement publicly. [4]
NBC Washington similarly reported that the White House said the board voted unanimously, and noted that the Kennedy Center’s name was set by Congress — a key detail now at the center of the legal and political controversy. [5]
CBS News, in a breaking update, also reported Leavitt’s announcement and reiterated that Trump serves as chairman of the Kennedy Center’s board of trustees. [6]
What the new name could be: “Trump‑Kennedy Center” vs. a longer formal title
While the shorthand “Trump‑Kennedy Center” is what the White House emphasized, The Washington Post reported that the Kennedy Center confirmed the vote and cited a statement from Roma Daravi, the center’s vice president of public relations. In that statement, Daravi said trustees voted unanimously to name the institution “The Donald J. Trump and The John F. Kennedy Memorial Center for the Performing Arts.” [7]
That distinction matters for what comes next. A shorter, catchier rebrand may dominate headlines and social media, but any official change to signage, legal filings, fundraising materials, and federal documentation could hinge on the exact wording and whether Congress weighs in. [8]
The biggest unresolved question: can the Kennedy Center be renamed without Congress?
Even as the news spread rapidly Thursday, the legality of a unilateral rename remained unclear.
NBC Washington highlighted the crucial point: the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts “was named by Congress.” [9]
The Washington Post reported that “officials did not immediately cite an authority for the board’s ability to change the institution’s name,” and pointed to prior legal scrutiny over naming proposals tied to the center. [10]
In the same Post report, Georgetown law professor David Super said — in the context of a previous naming push involving the Kennedy Center Opera House — that a name change would require Congress’s permission. [11]
In other words, Thursday’s vote may represent the board’s intent and political will — but it could still collide with federal statute, congressional oversight, or litigation before the rename becomes fully binding in practice.
How Trump got here: a year of upheaval at the Kennedy Center
The rename vote lands at the end of a turbulent year for the Kennedy Center, driven by Trump’s remaking of its leadership and direction.
NBC Washington reported that after Trump’s return to Washington in late January, he moved quickly: he ousted the institution’s leadership, filled the board with supporters, and announced he had been elected chair. [12]
Reuters previously reported that in February 2025, a newly reconstituted board elected Trump chairman and fired then‑president Deborah Rutter, naming Richard Grenell as interim president. Reuters also reported the revamped board included prominent Trump allies and administration figures. [13]
The Reuters reporting captured why the Kennedy Center became such a flashpoint: it is both a high-profile stage for American culture and a living civic symbol in Washington, home to the National Symphony Orchestra and Washington National Opera — institutions that historically benefited from bipartisan support. [14]
The cultural fallout: cancellations, resignations, and sliding ticket sales
The rebrand also arrives amid signs of strain between the Kennedy Center’s new political identity and its role as a broad public arts destination.
NBC Washington reported that prominent productions such as “Hamilton” canceled performances and that several artists and advisors withdrew from appearances or resigned, including musician Ben Folds and singer Renée Fleming. [15]
Reuters reported earlier in 2025 that “Hamilton” pulled out of a planned run following Trump-led changes, underscoring how programming decisions have become intertwined with politics and brand perception. [16]
The Washington Post added another data point that has fueled debate: it reported that ticket sales “have fallen sharply” in the center’s three largest venues, according to an October Post analysis. [17]
On Thursday, The Daily Beast amplified the same theme through the perspective of a longtime National Symphony Orchestra violist who described performing to a “sea of empty seats,” tying attendance declines to backlash over the institution’s new direction. (The article cites other reporting on unsold seats and show withdrawals.) [18]
Together, those reports suggest the rename is not just a symbolic flourish — it is also a high-stakes bet on whether rebranding can stabilize (or further polarize) a venue whose financial health depends heavily on ticket buyers, donors, touring productions, and artists willing to appear.
Reaction and backlash: Kennedy family criticism returns to the spotlight
The vote also revived an existing feud with at least some members of the Kennedy family, whose name has been attached to the institution for decades.
AP reported that Maria Shriver, a niece of President John F. Kennedy, previously condemned earlier legislative efforts to rename the Kennedy Center after Trump, calling the idea “insane” and “petty” in a social media post. [19]
AP also noted Shriver linked the Kennedy Center naming fight to broader frustrations over other changes to Kennedy-era symbols in Washington — including Trump’s reworking of the White House Rose Garden into a patio. [20]
The politics are further complicated by the fact that another Kennedy family member, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., currently serves in Trump’s Cabinet as Health and Human Services secretary, a detail AP included as the controversy broadened beyond arts circles. [21]
A detail emerging from today’s coverage: what happened inside the meeting
One of the more contentious details circulating Thursday came from CNN Newssource reporting, published by KRDO: it said the vote took place during a board meeting and that Trump called into the session, according to a source familiar with the matter. The same report said Democratic Rep. Joyce Beatty, an ex officio member of the board, attempted to object but was muted before the meeting adjourned. [22]
That account has not been uniformly echoed in every outlet’s early coverage, but it underscores how procedural fights — not just cultural ones — could shape what happens next.
Why the name change matters beyond the sign out front
For Trump, the rename fits a broader pattern of placing his name on institutions and landmarks, and Axios described the Kennedy Center as part of a push to “reinvent D.C.” and put his name on prominent buildings. [23]
For the Kennedy Center, the stakes are more complicated:
- Governance and legitimacy: If Congress must approve a rename, lawmakers could become the next arena for a fight that has already moved from the stage to the boardroom. [24]
- Fundraising and programming: Donors and touring productions may reassess their relationships with an institution whose brand has shifted from broadly civic to overtly presidential. [25]
- Audience trust: Reports of attendance and ticket-sales pressures have become part of the political argument — with supporters saying Trump “saved” the institution and critics pointing to boycotts and cancellations as evidence of reputational damage. [26]
What happens next: implementation, possible legal challenges, and congressional pressure
As of Thursday afternoon, several key questions remained open:
- When would the new name appear on official materials and signage?
- Will Congress intervene — to approve, block, or formalize the rename?
- Could the rename be challenged in court based on the Kennedy Center’s congressional naming statute? [27]
- How will artists, unions, donors, and audiences respond heading into the 2026 programming calendar? [28]
For now, what is clear is that “Trump Kennedy Center” is no longer just a punchline from a red carpet quip or a slip of the tongue before correcting himself mid-sentence. AP reported that Trump had repeatedly joked about the label — and on Dec. 18, his board voted to make it real, at least in name. [29]
References
1. apnews.com, 2. apnews.com, 3. www.nbcwashington.com, 4. apnews.com, 5. www.nbcwashington.com, 6. www.cbsnews.com, 7. www.washingtonpost.com, 8. www.washingtonpost.com, 9. www.nbcwashington.com, 10. www.washingtonpost.com, 11. www.washingtonpost.com, 12. www.nbcwashington.com, 13. www.reuters.com, 14. www.reuters.com, 15. www.nbcwashington.com, 16. www.reuters.com, 17. www.washingtonpost.com, 18. www.thedailybeast.com, 19. apnews.com, 20. apnews.com, 21. apnews.com, 22. krdo.com, 23. www.axios.com, 24. www.nbcwashington.com, 25. www.washingtonpost.com, 26. apnews.com, 27. www.nbcwashington.com, 28. www.nbcwashington.com, 29. apnews.com
