30 September 2025
6 mins read

SpaceX’s Starship Returns: Launch Set for Oct. 13 – A Lunar Race and Rocket Showdown Explained

SpaceX Starship: The Giant Rocket Poised to Change Space Travel Forever (2025 Update)
  • Launch Date & Profile: SpaceX has announced it is targeting Oct. 13, 2025, for Starship’s Flight 11 liftoff from its Starbase (Boca Chica), Texas site [1]. This will be the final flight of Starship’s current Block 2 (Version 2) design [2] [3]. The mission profile will closely repeat Flight 10’s: the Super Heavy booster will attempt a controlled splashdown in the Gulf of Mexico, and the Starship upper stage (called “Ship”) will drop into the Indian Ocean. Like before, Starship will carry eight dummy Starlink satellites for a “payload demo,” and SpaceX will deliberately remove some heat-shield tiles to stress-test weak spots on reentry [4].
  • Starship by the Numbers: Starship is the tallest and most powerful rocket ever built. Space.com notes that Version 2 stands nearly 121 m (400 ft) tall [5], and can carry roughly 150 metric tonnes to low Earth orbit in its fully reusable configuration [6]. (If flown expendable, its lift capacity could reach ~250 t.) For comparison, NASA’s Space Launch System (SLS) Block 1 rocket – used by the Artemis II crewed lunar mission – is about 98 m (322 ft) tall with a ≈95 t to LEO capacity [7] [8], while Blue Origin’s New Glenn booster (first flight Jan 2025) is ~98 m tall and will lift only ~45 t [9] [10]. Starship’s two-stage steel design (Super Heavy booster + Starship upper stage), both powered by methane-fueled Raptor engines, is engineered for rapid reuse: the booster and ship are intended to land vertically (even catching in the launch tower with robotic “chopstick” arms on future flights) [11] [12].
  • Flight 10 Recap: SpaceX’s last flight (Flight 10 on Aug. 26, 2025) was declared a full success. SpaceX reported that “every major objective was met” [13]: the booster and ship lofted together, the booster performed a boost-back burn and five-engine landing burn, and Starship deployed eight Starlink mass simulators in orbit – Starship’s first successful payload deployment [14] [15]. Ship 37 even relit a Raptor engine in space, then re-entered with a shallower angle to test its heat shield under duress [16] [17]. Both stages made their planned splashdowns (though they tipped over on impact), gathering data. Importantly, Flight 10’s success jump-started the program after a string of in-flight failures in early 2025; SpaceX has since resumed “fast-paced testing,” with Booster 15 static-firing on Sept. 7 and Ship 38 static-firing on Sept. 22 [18]. NASA expects lessons from Flight 10 will feed into Flight 11, which will continue experimenting with heat-shield improvements and splashdown procedures [19] [20].
  • Testing & Upgrades: SpaceX is taking steps to fix issues revealed on prior flights. For Flight 11, engineers will reinforce the heat shield with added “crunch-wrap” felt under the tiles to better seal gaps and prevent burn-through [21]. Booster 15 (the Flight 11 first stage) will perform a novel five-engine landing burn (using five of 33 Raptors instead of the usual three) to fine-tune descent control. SpaceX says this will build redundancy for the next-generation booster and align with the planned landing mode for Block 3 [22]. Ship 38 (the upper stage) will again carry experimental missing tiles to focus reentry stress on vulnerable spots. Both craft are being reused: Booster 15 flew Flight 8 in March 2025, and 24 of its 33 engines are already flight-proven [23]. This marks Starship’s second-ever booster reuse (the first was on Flight 9) [24]. And critically, all static-fire tests (Booster 15’s full-duration 33-engine test on Sept. 7, and Ship 38’s 6-engine test on Sept. 22) have shown the boosters to be extremely reliable [25] [26].
  • Regulatory & Infrastructure: Unlike last year’s orbital launch attempt, the FAA has cleared the way for Flight 11. After each in-flight or test anomaly, SpaceX submitted failure reports and fixes. For example, before Flight 10 the FAA concluded its mishap investigation (Flight 9’s loss) and approved the next launch [27]. SpaceX also resolved a ground-test explosion (Ship 36) by improving the composite overwrapped pressure vessels (COPVs) [28]. Starbase infrastructure is still under repair from Summer 2025 test stand damage, but SpaceX anticipates no further regulatory delays “as long as [flights] align with the current suborbital license” [29]. Notably, NASA’s Kennedy Space Center Launch Complex 39A is being upgraded for Starship: SpaceX plans to start launching Block 3 (Version 3) Starships there as early as 2026, to carry humans and payloads from both coasts [30].
  • NASA & Artemis Moon Mission: Starship isn’t just a tech demo – it is NASA’s chosen lunar lander for the Artemis program. In 2021 NASA contracted SpaceX to build a crewed Starship HLS (Human Landing System) to ferry astronauts from lunar orbit to the Moon’s south pole [31]. NASA currently targets mid-2027 for Artemis III (the first crewed Moon landing since Apollo) [32]. SpaceX must launch multiple Starships into orbit, dock them to form fuel depots, and demonstrate a full lunar mission profile before then. However, NASA’s auditors and safety panel warn this schedule is “significantly challenged.” The Aerospace Safety Advisory Panel (composed of former NASA astronauts and managers) reported in Sep. 2025 that Starship HLS is likely “years late” for the 2027 Artemis timeline [33]. Panelist Paul Hill (former NASA Mission Operations head) noted that orbital refueling – a key unproven step – is critical and still missing. He emphasized that “the next six months of Starship launches will be telling about the likelihood of HLS flying crew in 2027” [34]. (Hill also acknowledged that SpaceX remains the only outfit with the tempo and scale to attempt this, saying no competitor can match its manufacturing throughput or flight rate [35].)
  • US–China Space Race: NASA leaders feel pressure to beat China back to the Moon. At a Sept. 2025 hearing NASA’s acting chief Sean Duffy vowed “We are going to beat the Chinese to the Moon… safely, fast, and right” [36]. Indeed, former NASA administrator Jim Bridenstine has testified he finds it “highly unlikely” the U.S. will land before China, given delays [37]. China’s space program has publicly aimed for a crewed lunar landing by the early 2030s, and recent rover missions have built momentum. NASA’s Artemis managers and U.S. lawmakers view the next Moon landing as a strategic race. As Sen. Ted Cruz noted in a SpacePolicy hearing, “This is a pivotal moment… whoever reaches the lunar surface first will set the norms for space exploration” [38]. That urgency partly explains Congress’s mandate: NASA is to “land the next American astronauts on the Moon before China” [39], even though experts warn that any slip in Starship’s schedule likely pushes a crewed landing beyond 2027.
  • Rocket Rivalry: Starship’s missions highlight how it towers over any current rival. SpaceX often contrasts Starship with NASA’s 1960s Saturn V: Starship is taller (≈121 m vs Saturn V’s 110 m) and was designed to be fully reusable – a first in history. Compared to modern rockets, Starship’s edge is stark. NASA SLS (Artemis’s workhorse) is roughly 98 m tall and only partly reusable (its massive core and boosters are expendable), whereas Starship’s two stages are metal and meant to fly again. Blue Origin’s New Glenn (its Super Heavy equivalent) is only ~45 t to LEO and has never landed its first stage despite one launch [40]. Europe’s Ariane 6 (debuting later in 2025) will lift ~26 t. In short, no other rocket currently operational or imminent comes close to Starship’s size or payload. This capability is why NASA bet its Moon-landing HLS on Starship and why SpaceX touts Starship as “the world’s most powerful launch vehicle ever developed” [41].
  • Beyond the Moon: While NASA’s focus is lunar, SpaceX’s long-term vision remains Mars. Elon Musk’s goal is a self-sustaining city on Mars by 2050, and Starship is the only rocket built with that scope. SpaceX also plans uncrewed orbital missions to Mars and had even sold Moon tourism flights before pivoting Artemis. But in the near term, Starship’s work will include more Earth-orbit missions: deploying satellites (Starlink and commercial payloads), building space stations or infrastructure, and eventually commercial lunar ventures. Flight 11 is a critical shakedown for these ambitions. If successful, it will clear the way for Starship’s final Block 2 mission, and then the switch to Block 3 (larger, more powerful ships) as early as Flight 12.
  • Expert Takeaway: Industry analysts stress that every Starship test is experimental. As SpaceExplored’s Seth Kurkowski noted, Flight 10’s success simply restored SpaceX’s momentum – “fast-paced testing… with a new challenge never attempted before” [42]. Experts caution that dates are tentative. Even SpaceX CEO Elon Musk’s ambitious timeline is fluid; history shows setbacks are common. Nevertheless, SpaceX has demonstrated an uncanny ability to iterate rapidly: for example, Booster 15’s nine-day turnaround between flights and its perfect 33-engine static fire showed great progress [43]. If Flight 11 goes as planned, SpaceX expects to embrace Version 3 vessels next – meaning Starship will only grow larger and more capable. In the words of a SpacePolicy panelist, “Nothing the company has done has happened exactly when it wanted it to be done” – but each launch “builds on lessons and accelerates progress toward operational status” [44] [45].

Sources: Official SpaceX announcements and live-test reports [46] [47]; Space.com and SpaceExplored news articles covering the Flight 10 success and Oct. 13 announcement [48] [49]; NASA and Congressional briefings on Artemis timelines [50] [51]; NASA Advisory Panel analysis [52] [53]; and public flight logs and press summaries [54] [55]. These sources provide the latest updates on Starship’s development, objectives, and its role in the upcoming Moon missions and broader space exploration landscape.

Starship | Tenth Flight Test

References

1. www.space.com, 2. www.space.com, 3. en.wikipedia.org, 4. www.space.com, 5. www.space.com, 6. www.friendsofnasa.org, 7. www.nasa.gov, 8. www.space.com, 9. en.wikipedia.org, 10. www.friendsofnasa.org, 11. www.space.com, 12. en.wikipedia.org, 13. www.friendsofnasa.org, 14. www.friendsofnasa.org, 15. en.wikipedia.org, 16. www.friendsofnasa.org, 17. en.wikipedia.org, 18. spaceexplored.com, 19. www.space.com, 20. www.nasaspaceflight.com, 21. www.nasaspaceflight.com, 22. www.space.com, 23. www.space.com, 24. www.space.com, 25. www.nasaspaceflight.com, 26. www.nasaspaceflight.com, 27. www.nasaspaceflight.com, 28. www.nasaspaceflight.com, 29. www.nasaspaceflight.com, 30. www.nasaspaceflight.com, 31. en.wikipedia.org, 32. www.nasa.gov, 33. gizmodo.com, 34. gizmodo.com, 35. gizmodo.com, 36. www.space.com, 37. www.space.com, 38. gizmodo.com, 39. spacepolicyonline.com, 40. en.wikipedia.org, 41. www.friendsofnasa.org, 42. spaceexplored.com, 43. www.nasaspaceflight.com, 44. www.nasaspaceflight.com, 45. spacepolicyonline.com, 46. www.space.com, 47. www.friendsofnasa.org, 48. www.space.com, 49. spaceexplored.com, 50. www.nasa.gov, 51. www.space.com, 52. spacepolicyonline.com, 53. gizmodo.com, 54. en.wikipedia.org, 55. www.nasaspaceflight.com

SWIFT’s Blockchain Breakthrough: Banks Race to Supercharge Global Payments
Previous Story

SWIFT’s Blockchain Breakthrough: Banks Race to Supercharge Global Payments

Meet Opera Neon: The $19.99/Month AI Browser That Does Your Browsing For You
Next Story

Meet Opera Neon: The $19.99/Month AI Browser That Does Your Browsing For You

Go toTop