- Powerful Foldable Flagship: The Huawei Mate X5 Ultimate 5G is a high-end foldable smartphone with a 7.85-inch inner OLED display and 6.4-inch cover display (both 120Hz) [1]. It’s powered by Huawei’s in-house Kirin 9000S 5G chipset, paired with up to 16GB RAM and 1TB storage [2].
- Camera & Battery: Features a triple rear camera system (50MP main, 13MP ultrawide, 12MP 5× periscope telephoto) plus 8MP selfie cameras on both displays [3]. A 5,060 mAh battery supports 66W wired and 50W wireless fast charging, plus reverse wireless charging [4].
- Premium Build: The Mate X5 has an IPX8 water-resistant folding design and uses ultra-tough Kunlun Glass for durability [5]. It measures 11.1mm thick when folded (5.3mm unfolded) and weighs ~243–245g [6]. Available finishes include faux leather and “Feather Sand” glass in Black, White, Gold, Green, and Phantom Purple [7].
- Software: Runs Huawei’s HarmonyOS 4.0 (China) or EMUI (international), with no Google services pre-installed. Supports two-way Beidou satellite messaging and other flagship perks like Bluetooth 5.2, USB 3.1, and advanced multitasking features [8] [9].
- Market Impact: Launched September 2023 in China (skipping the “X4” moniker as 4 is unlucky) [10], the Mate X5 sold out soon after release due to high demand [11]. It has since propelled Huawei to a leading 27–37% share of the global foldable market [12], despite U.S. tech sanctions.
Huawei Mate X5 Ultimate 5G – Overview and Specs
Huawei’s Mate X5 Ultimate 5G is a statement of the company’s resilience and innovation in the foldable arena. It closely resembles its predecessor (the Mate X3) in design [13], but skips the “X4” naming. Instead, Huawei jumped to X5 – a deliberate omission since the number 4 is considered bad luck in China [14]. The Mate X5 sports an inward-folding design with two high-quality OLED screens: a flexible 7.85″ inner display (2496×2224 resolution, ~426 ppi) and a 6.4″ outer cover display (2504×1080) [15] [16]. Both panels support a smooth 120Hz refresh rate and ultra-high frequency 1440Hz PWM dimming for flicker-free viewing [17]. The cover screen is a 3D curved OLED panel that, on the Collector’s/Ultimate edition, even features LTPO adaptive refresh (1–120Hz) for power efficiency [18].
Under the hood, the Mate X5 Ultimate is powered by the Kirin 9000S – an octa-core chip fabricated in China, marking Huawei’s return to 5G capability on phones. This chip was shrouded in secrecy at launch, but reports indicate it uses a 7nm process and modern CPU cores (Cortex-A720/A510) with a custom Maleoon 910 GPU [19]. In real-world terms, performance is flagship-grade; while it may not benchmark quite as high as Qualcomm’s latest, it delivers a snappy, high-end experience and crucially includes 5G connectivity that Huawei’s phones lacked for a few years [20]. The phone comes with 12GB or 16GB of RAM, and storage options from 256GB up to 1TB (the 1TB is exclusive to the Ultimate Collector’s edition) [21]. Storage is even expandable via Huawei’s NM card format [22], offering flexibility rare in modern flagships.
In the camera department, Huawei leverages its XMAGE imaging system to compete with the best. The Mate X5 packs a triple-camera array on the rear: a 50MP f/1.8 main sensor with OIS, a 13MP ultrawide (f/2.2, 120° FoV), and a 12MP periscope telephoto (f/3.4) with 5× optical zoom (125mm equivalent) and up to 50× digital zoom [23]. This periscope lens gives Huawei a long-range zoom advantage over certain rivals. Each screen’s punch-hole houses an 8MP selfie camera [24], enabling video calls or self-portraits whether the device is open or closed. Image quality benefits from Huawei’s acclaimed computational photography, and the company’s post-Leica XMAGE tuning emphasizes realistic colors and detail.
Powering the Mate X5 is a 5,060 mAh silicon-carbon battery, a capacity notably larger than most foldables. Huawei claims this special battery chemistry (available in China) boosts energy density. In practice, the Mate X5 easily lasts a full day – and when it needs a top-up, it supports 66W Huawei SuperCharge wired fast charging and 50W wireless charging, plus 7.5W reverse wireless charging to juice up accessories [25]. This charging speeds trump the Galaxy Z Fold’s more modest rates. Despite its large battery, the Mate X5 maintains a slim and premium build – just 11.08 mm thick when folded and an astonishing 5.3 mm when unfolded into a tablet-like form [26]. At ~245 grams, it’s lighter than some competitors and feels well-balanced. The chassis carries an IPX8 water-resistance rating, meaning it can survive accidental dunks (up to 1.5m for 30 minutes) [27]. Notably, Huawei and Samsung are among the few offering any ingress protection on foldables; most rivals lack official water/dust proofing [28].
The Mate X5 Ultimate’s construction is built to exude luxury and toughness. Huawei uses a dual-track wing hinge design refined from the Mate X3, which allows a near-gapless closure and a minimal screen crease. The hinge mechanism is crafted with durable materials and enhanced by Kunlun Glass layers on the displays – Huawei touts a 300% improvement in scratch resistance and 100% better drop resistance thanks to this glass technology [29]. In fact, the Mate X5’s robust build earned it a “Best of MWC 2024” award for its trendy design, tech-packed capabilities, and durability [30] [31]. Huawei even offers the device in Collector’s Edition trims (sometimes dubbed the “Ultimate Design” edition) which feature premium finishes and that advanced LTPO display tech. These top models max out at 16GB RAM + 1TB storage and came with a hefty price tag of ¥16,999 (~$2,300) at launch [32].
On the software side, the Mate X5 runs HarmonyOS 4.0 in China, a slick Android-derived OS with Huawei’s own app ecosystem. It delivers fluid multitasking on the big screen – e.g. split-screen apps, floating windows, and an optimized UI for the foldable format. Huawei’s software includes smart multi-window gestures and a familiar task-switcher, though it lacks Google Mobile Services due to trade restrictions. (Internationally, an EMUI 13-based firmware can be installed, but users must sideload Google apps manually.) The phone supports innovative extras like two-way satellite SMS via Beidou – enabling texting when off the grid, a feature Huawei pioneered on its flagships [33]. All told, the Mate X5 Ultimate 5G stands as one of the most feature-complete foldables to date, marrying top-notch hardware with Huawei’s resilience-driven engineering.
Recent News and Developments
Huawei launched the Mate X5 very quietly in September 2023, just days after revealing its Mate 60 series phones [34]. Despite the lack of an international fanfare, the X5’s debut in China was met with huge enthusiasm – the device sold out soon after its release in September, according to reports [35]. This overwhelming demand outstripped supply partly because the Mate X5 (along with Huawei’s Mate 60 Pro) symbolized a triumphant return of 5G for Huawei phones. After years of U.S. sanctions blocking 5G chip access, Huawei managed to equip the Mate X5 with a homegrown 5G Kirin chip, surprising many industry experts. “The real surprise: the Kirin 9000S, a 7-nanometer, full 5G-capable chip that experts believed could not exist under U.S. sanctions,” noted one analyst [36]. This technological comeback turned the Mate X5 into more than just another foldable – it became a patriotic bestseller in China, with some retailers seeing pre-orders surge.
By early 2024, the Mate X5’s success was quantifiable. Huawei’s foldable phone sales soared, helping the company capture over 50% of China’s foldable market share by the end of 2023 [37]. Analysts at Canalys tallied 2.2 million units of Mate X5 sold as of Q2 2024 [38] – an impressive figure for a ultra-premium device. This made the Mate X5 one of the best-selling foldables globally and propelled Huawei to #1 in global foldable shipments (about 27–37% market share), surpassing even Samsung in certain quarters [39]. Huawei’s resurgence in foldables is significant; the global foldable market is expected to triple to 50 million units annually by 2027 [40], and Huawei is leveraging its home advantage to lead the pack, at least in volume.
Huawei has continued to build on this momentum. In mid-2024, the company introduced the Mate X5 Collector’s Edition (Ultimate version) with upgraded specs and materials, and even teased a tri-fold device (the Mate “XT”) for future innovation [41]. The Mate X5 itself garnered accolades, winning a “Best of MWC 2024” award as mentioned, and remained in high demand well into 2024. By May 2025, Huawei prepared to launch its next-gen Mate X6, but not before giving the Mate X5 a substantial price cut during China’s 618 shopping festival: a 3,000 ¥ discount (~$416 off) was offered, bringing the Mate X5’s price down to ¥11,499 (≈$1,600) for the promotion [42] [43]. Even at that price, the Mate X5 is hardly cheap – but it still retails around 11,500 yuan (~$1,630) in China for the base version as of mid-2024, reflecting its premium status [44].
Huawei’s executives have been bullish about these developments. Richard Yu, CEO of Huawei’s Consumer Business, has touted the company’s perseverance: “Our team has been working hard for five years and has never given up,” he said at a 2024 launch event, referring to overcoming foldable design challenges under sanctions [45]. Yu has also not shied away from stoking rivalry. In a jab at competitors, he reportedly accused “some competitors [of] tak[ing] our intellectual property and renam[ing] it as their own” [46] – a remark presumed to be aimed at Xiaomi’s hinge design. (Xiaomi denied this, calling the claim “out of line with facts.”) The spat underscores how critical hinge technology and design leadership are in the foldable race. Indeed, Huawei points out that its Mate X5 uses a sophisticated “dual-track wing-shaped” hinge mechanism (carried from Mate X3) that others are now emulating [47].
Another headline around the Mate X5 Ultimate 5G is its role in Huawei’s broader strategy. The phone’s 5G Kirin chip was analyzed by tech experts, revealing a breakthrough by China’s Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corp (SMIC) in producing 7nm silicon – a feat many thought impossible under export controls. This has geopolitical implications, and Chinese tech enthusiasts rallied around the Mate X5 and Mate 60 Pro as symbols of technological self-reliance [48]. On a business level, Huawei is parlaying the Mate X5’s success to attempt a global comeback. The company is reportedly seeking to expand distribution of its Kirin-powered 5G phones to more countries [49], focusing on markets like Europe, Middle East, and Asia where it can sell phones without U.S. components. However, the lack of Google services and ongoing restrictions mean the Mate X5 remains officially sold only in China (and select regions) for now [50]. Tech enthusiasts in other countries can only obtain it via importers. Despite these hurdles, Huawei’s achievement with the Mate X5 Ultimate – effectively closing the gap with Samsung in the foldable arena – is reshaping the competitive landscape.
Display Quality and Form Factor Comparison
The Mate X5 Ultimate enters a field crowded with innovative foldables, notably Samsung’s Galaxy Z Fold5, Xiaomi’s Mix Fold 3, and Honor’s Magic V2. Each takes a slightly different approach to the display and form factor puzzle, balancing phone usability when folded with tablet-like immersion when opened.
Screen Size and Aspect Ratio: Huawei’s Mate X5 offers a spacious 7.85-inch inner display, which is on par with other large foldables. Samsung’s Galaxy Z Fold5 has a 7.6″ inner screen (22.5:18 aspect ratio), a tad smaller than Huawei’s. Xiaomi’s Mix Fold 3 stretches even further with an 8.03-inch inner display – one of the largest on a mainstream foldable [51]. In use, that difference is noticeable: “The Galaxy Z Fold5’s unfolded AMOLED screen is 7.6 inches, while the Mix Fold 3’s is significantly larger at 8.03 inches,” giving Xiaomi a more expansive, tablet-like feel [52]. Honor’s Magic V2 comes in around 7.92″ inside [53], basically matching Huawei’s size. All four devices use high-resolution, vibrant OLED panels with 120Hz refresh rates, so they deliver smooth visuals and deep contrast. The crease in the folding screen – an inevitable side effect – is an area of differentiation. Huawei’s hinge design results in a very subtle crease; similarly, Xiaomi’s Mix Fold 3 has a “much less visible crease” than Samsung’s Fold5 [54]. Xiaomi claims its new water-drop hinge limits crease growth to just ~10 microns after 200,000 folds [55], highlighting the engineering push to make foldable displays nearly seamless.
When folded shut, cover display dimensions greatly affect day-to-day usability. Huawei and Honor have an advantage here: the Mate X5’s external screen is 6.4″ with a fairly wide aspect ratio (approx 20.9:9), and the Magic V2’s is 6.43″ (21:9). These covers are similar to a regular smartphone screen in width. In contrast, Samsung’s Fold5 has a 6.2″ cover display but with a very tall, narrow format (~23.1:9), making the usable width only ~57mm. Many users find typing on the Galaxy’s skinny front screen cramped. As one reviewer noted, “If you’ve used any Galaxy Z Fold, you know the front screen is one cramped affair… typos [on the Fold5] due to the narrow keyboard…forced me to open it up for long bouts of messaging.” [56] Huawei’s Mate X5 (72.4mm wide folded) and Xiaomi’s Mix Fold 3 (6.56″ 21:9 display, ~66mm wide) feel much more natural in hand. That ~9mm difference in width is significant – “the Mix Fold 3’s cover screen measures 66mm wide, versus the Z Fold5’s 57mm, which is the difference between comfortable and cramped typing,” as T3’s hands-on comparison described [57]. The Honor Magic V2 likewise has a comfortably wide cover display (6.43″ 2376×1060, ~74mm device width) [58]. In summary, Huawei, Honor, and Xiaomi prioritize a normal phone experience when folded, whereas Samsung’s design remains more compact and narrow, which some love for one-handed use but others dislike for typing.
Display Quality: All these foldables boast OLED screens with rich colors and high peak brightness. Samsung’s Fold5 panel can hit up to 1750 nits peak brightness for HDR content [59], ensuring great outdoor visibility. Huawei hasn’t published a nit spec for the Mate X5, but its Collector’s Edition reportedly achieves up to 1800 nits peak on both screens [60] – on par with Samsung’s. Xiaomi’s Mix Fold 3 and Honor’s Magic V2 are in a similar ballpark (around 1300–1600 nits peak, according to reviews). Notably, Huawei and Honor use 1440Hz PWM dimming to reduce flicker at low brightness, a trait Huawei highlights for eye comfort [61]. All devices support HDR, wide color gamuts, and have no lack of sharpness (the Mate X5’s inner screen at ~426 ppi is actually denser than the Fold5’s ~373 ppi).
Build and Form Factor: In terms of build, the inward-folding “book” design is common to all these models – the large flexible screen folds shut on the inside, with a secondary screen on the outside. This design protects the main display (unlike the first-gen outward-folding Huawei Mate X from 2019). Huawei, Samsung, Xiaomi, and Honor each have their own hinge mechanisms. Huawei’s hinge, as mentioned, is the “dual rotating wing” type that distributes stress and enables a tight fold. Xiaomi’s new hinge in the Mix Fold 3 introduced a free-stop mechanism (finally allowing the screen to stay half-open at various angles, useful for “laptop mode”) [62], which previous Mix Folds lacked. Samsung’s Fold5 uses a teardrop hinge that debuted on this generation – it eliminated the gap when closed and made the device slightly thinner and lighter than Fold4. The Fold5 can stay open at various angles and is well-tested; Samsung advertises it can endure 200,000+ folds (and internal tests pushed it to 400,000) [63]. Xiaomi tops that with a hinge rated for 500,000 folds [64] – an impressive claim to longevity. Honor’s Magic V2 uses a custom dual-carbon fiber and titanium alloy hinge to achieve its extreme thinness, and is rated for at least 400,000 folds as well. None of these hinges are fragile per se, but real-world durability will depend on usage. So far, the Mate X5 has proven durable, with no major reports of hinge failure; Huawei’s confidence is shown by its brag that drop resistance is doubled on the X5 thanks to tough materials [65].
Portability: One of the headline feats of the Honor Magic V2 is how thin and light it is. At just 9.9 mm thick when folded and 231 g, the Magic V2 is “the thinnest and lightest large foldable yet… substantially slimmer than anything released by Samsung so far,” even edging out Huawei’s Mate X3/X5 [66]. For comparison, the Mate X5 is ~11.1 mm folded (very slim for a foldable) and 243 g; the Galaxy Z Fold5 is ~13.4 mm folded and 253 g; Xiaomi’s Mix Fold 3 is about 10.9 mm folded and 255–259 g (depending on the materials) [67]. So Honor leads in sleekness, with Huawei and Xiaomi close behind, and Samsung notably bulkier (although still pocketable). All four unfold to around 4.7–6 mm thin, feeling like a slice of glass and metal. The reduction in weight and thickness generation over generation is making these foldables easier to carry; the gap between a Fold5 and a regular slab phone is closing.
In summary, Huawei’s Mate X5 Ultimate 5G holds its own in display and form factor against top rivals. It offers a wide, usable cover screen akin to Xiaomi and Honor (a clear usability win over Samsung’s narrow front), an expansive and vibrant inner display with minimal crease, and a relatively slim, premium build. Honor’s Magic V2 slightly undercuts everyone in thickness and weight, appealing to those who value ultimate portability. Xiaomi’s Mix Fold 3 pushes the envelope on screen size and camera integration (as we’ll cover next), while Samsung’s Fold5, though conservative in design, remains the standard-bearer for polished foldable hardware globally – and it’s the only one of these sold widely outside China. Each device’s form factor reflects different philosophies: Huawei and Xiaomi aim for the no-compromise big screen experience (even if that means a wider fold), Honor aims for thinness and elegance, and Samsung balances foldable utility with one-hand-friendly narrowness and proven durability.
Performance: Chipset, RAM, and Thermals
Performance is a crucial aspect where the Mate X5 Ultimate and its competitors take slightly different paths due to varying chipsets. The Mate X5’s beating heart is the Kirin 9000S 5G SoC, Huawei’s custom silicon built to restore 5G capabilities. It’s an octa-core chip rumored to feature 2 high-performance Cortex-A720 cores, 6 efficient Cortex-A510 cores, and a custom Maleoon 910 GPU [68]. The Kirin 9000S is fabricated on an advanced 7nm process – remarkable under trade constraints – but still a generation behind the 4nm process used by Qualcomm’s latest chips.
In day-to-day use, the Mate X5 feels extremely fast: apps launch quickly, multitasking is smooth on the large display, and the UI animations are fluid (helped by that 120Hz refresh rate). Benchmarks suggest the Kirin 9000S delivers CPU performance in the ballpark of a Snapdragon 8+ Gen1, with slightly lower GPU scores. This means any task, from productivity to high-end gaming, is handled with ease, though the absolute peak frame rates might lag behind a Snapdragon 8 Gen2 device by a small margin. The upside of Huawei’s chip is efficiency and integrated 5G: the Mate X5 gets solid battery life for its size, and users benefit from 5G network support again [69] (a big deal for Huawei fans after 4G-only models). The phone’s cooling system – likely graphene and vapor chamber based – has to contend with the tight space in a foldable. While Huawei hasn’t trumpeted any special cooling in marketing, extended gaming will warm the device as expected. However, thanks to the large surface area when unfolded, heat spreads out, and no significant thermal throttling issues have been reported in early testing. The hinge area does not get excessively hot, indicating the design handles thermals well for a foldable.
Comparatively, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 is powered by the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (For Galaxy) – a slightly overclocked version of the 4nm flagship chip. This SoC is one of the fastest on the market, giving the Fold5 a performance edge in GPU-intensive tasks. In benchmarks, the Fold5 tends to score higher than Kirin-powered phones, especially in graphics. Samsung pairs it with 12GB of LPDDR5X RAM. Real-world, the Fold5 is lightning fast and can even handle Samsung’s DeX desktop mode smoothly. It also has the advantage of sustained performance due to years of optimization, though in extreme scenarios the Fold5 can throttle (the tight foldable form means it can get warm). Xiaomi’s Mix Fold 3 and Honor’s Magic V2 both use the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 as well (the Mix Fold 3 even uses an “overclocked” variant similar to Samsung’s) [70]. Both come with up to 16GB RAM (Xiaomi offers 12GB/16GB options; Honor Magic V2 comes with 16GB standard), ensuring plenty of memory for multitasking. These Snapdragon 8 Gen2 devices are exceptionally powerful – any difference between them and the Kirin 9000S in everyday use is minor. Animations, app launches, and multitasking are all seamless across the board. It’s really only in heavy 3D gaming or number-crunching that the Snapdragon might pull ahead by ~10-20%.
One thing to note is software optimization: Huawei’s HarmonyOS is very snappy and tuned for the hardware, arguably matching the smoothness of Xiaomi’s MIUI Fold and bettering some aspects of Honor’s MagicOS. Meanwhile, Samsung’s One UI has the most feature-rich software but can feel a tad heavier (though on the Fold5’s robust chip, it’s still very smooth). All devices have UFS 4.0 fast storage, so read/write speeds are excellent, aiding overall performance.
In terms of thermals, foldables have less room for cooling compared to tablets or thicker phones. The Mate X5’s thermal management appears adequate – during multitasking or video streaming it stays cool; during gaming or 4K video recording it can get warm but not alarmingly so. Xiaomi’s Mix Fold 3 has a very thin chassis, and some users note it can heat up under stress, but its graphite cooling helps avoid severe throttling. Honor’s Magic V2, being ultra-slim, might be the most thermally constrained of the group, but Honor likely lowered clock speeds slightly to compensate. Samsung’s Fold5, with the most mature cooling design, handles sustained loads decently but will reduce performance after prolonged stress (as seen in stress tests where it prioritizes keeping surface temperatures comfortable).
Memory and storage are plentiful on all these foldables. Huawei offering a 16GB RAM + 1TB option in the Mate X5 Ultimate model is on par with Xiaomi’s top Mix Fold (16GB+1TB) [71] and Honor’s top Magic V2 (which in China has an “Ultimate” edition with 16GB+1TB plus a stylus) [72]. Samsung caps the Fold5 at 12GB RAM and up to 1TB storage, which is still ample. In multitasking scenarios like running three apps split-screen or using floating windows, each phone keeps up without reloads; the extra RAM on the 16GB models just provides more headroom for future-proofing or very heavy multitasking.
In summary, performance on the Huawei Mate X5 Ultimate 5G is flagship-level, and Huawei’s Kirin 9000S holds its own against the Snapdragon 8 Gen2 found in rivals for most tasks. While the Snapdragon-equipped Fold5, Mix Fold3, and Magic V2 have a raw horsepower edge, the Mate X5 delivers 5G and efficient operation that make it feel just as fast in daily use. The differences in chipset also have an influence on software experience (especially since Huawei’s OS is different from the Android-based others), but in terms of speed and responsiveness, none of these foldables will leave users wanting. Any thermal throttling in extreme use is managed well by all devices, given the engineering constraints of thin foldable designs.
Camera Systems: A New Foldable Photography Showdown
Foldable phones are no longer compromising much on cameras – and the Huawei Mate X5 Ultimate exemplifies this trend with an impressive camera setup rivaling other flagships. Let’s compare the camera systems of the Mate X5 with the Galaxy Z Fold5, Xiaomi Mix Fold 3, and Honor Magic V2, highlighting their strengths:
Huawei Mate X5 Ultimate 5G: Triple rear cameras co-engineered with Huawei’s XMAGE imaging. It has a 50MP main camera (large sensor, f/1.8, OIS) that captures excellent detail and low-light shots. The 13MP ultrawide camera offers a broad perspective for landscapes or tight spaces. Uniquely, Huawei includes a 12MP periscope telephoto lens with 5× optical zoom (125mm equivalent) and OIS [73]. This periscope lets the Mate X5 punch in optically much further than Samsung’s 3× zoom, and it can reach up to 50× digital for long-range snaps. The image quality at 5× is sharp and beats any digital zoom. Huawei’s processing also tends to produce balanced, natural colors (a result of its XMAGE pipeline after parting with Leica). On the front, the Mate X5 has dual 8MP selfie cameras – one embedded in the cover display and one in the inner screen. They’re not high resolution, but they are serviceable for video calls and selfies, and having one on the inside means you can video chat with the big screen or take selfies using the rear cameras plus cover screen as a viewfinder if you want higher quality (a trick all these inward foldables can do). Overall, the Mate X5’s camera array is flagship-grade; in fact, with a periscope lens on board, it arguably outguns the Galaxy Fold5’s camera and matches some of Huawei’s own bar phones in versatility.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5: Samsung equipped the Fold5 with a capable, if not cutting-edge, camera trio carried over from the Fold4. It has a 50MP main sensor (f/1.8, 1.0µm pixels, Dual Pixel AF, OIS) – essentially the same camera module from the Galaxy S22 series – which delivers vibrant colors and wide dynamic range. There’s a 12MP ultrawide (f/2.2, 123°) good for broad shots, and a 10MP telephoto with 3× optical zoom (approx 70mm, f/2.4, OIS). This 3× lens produces decent portraits and closer shots, but Samsung didn’t include a periscope on the Fold, likely due to space constraints. The Fold5 can achieve 10× digital reasonably well, but beyond that quality drops. On the front, the Fold5 actually has two selfie cameras: a 10MP punch-hole camera on the cover screen (excellent quality) and a 4MP under-display camera (UDC) hidden beneath the inner screen. That UDC is innovative but its quality is quite poor (images are soft and lacking detail) – it’s mainly for video calls where convenience matters more than clarity. Samsung’s image processing is known to be punchy: it produces saturated, bright images that many users enjoy, though they can appear less natural than Huawei or Xiaomi’s. In comparisons, the Mate X5’s photos may look more true-to-life, whereas Samsung’s pop with contrast. Low-light performance on the Fold5 main camera is very good with Night Mode, though Huawei’s larger sensor might have an edge in extreme low light. The lack of a long zoom is where the Galaxy Fold5 is clearly behind; for instance, Xiaomi’s Mix Fold 3 “edges ahead” in zoom capabilities by offering not one but two telephoto cameras [74], and Huawei’s 5× zoom similarly offers more reach than Samsung’s 3× [75].
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3: Xiaomi made camera prowess a priority in the Mix Fold 3, partnering with Leica for tuning. It boasts a quad-camera setup on the back – the most lenses of this bunch. The primary is a 50MP Sony IMX800 sensor (f/1.8, OIS) – the same excellent main camera as in the Xiaomi 13, yielding sharp and balanced shots [76]. The ultrawide is 12MP (f/2.2) with a 120° field of view, comparable to Samsung’s. Where the Mix Fold 3 really shines: it has two telephoto cameras. One is a 10MP 3.2× zoom (around 75mm, likely f/2.0) for medium-range zoom and portraits. The second is a 10MP periscope with 5× optical zoom (around 115mm) [77]. This dual-tele setup means the Mix Fold 3 covers a range from 0.6× ultrawide, 1× main, 3.2× mid-tele, to 5× far-tele – an impressive arsenal that no other foldable matched in 2023. A reviewer noted, “Zooming is where the Mix Fold 3 edges ahead… adding a 5x zoom periscope camera to the mix, giving it Pixel Fold-like optical reach,” beyond what the Fold5 can do [78]. Indeed, the Mix Fold 3 can rival the Google Pixel Fold’s 5× zoom while also having a shorter 3× lens for flexibility. Xiaomi’s Leica partnership means users can choose between Leica Authentic or Vibrant color modes in the camera app; generally, Xiaomi’s images have a slightly more contrasty yet “subdued and realistic” look compared to Samsung’s, which can be over-saturated [79] [80]. As for front cameras, the Mix Fold 3 reportedly has a 20MP selfie on the inner display (in a corner punch-hole) and another 20MP on the cover – plenty of resolution for detailed selfies or video calls (though many enthusiasts prefer using the rear cameras with the cover screen preview for best results). The inclusion of a free-standing hinge means the Mix Fold 3 can also do flex mode photography – e.g., set it half-open on a table for a hands-free group shot, an area Samsung popularized.
Honor Magic V2: Honor’s Magic V2 doesn’t go overboard on cameras but still packs a solid trio, quite similar to a standard flagship. It has a 50MP main (f/1.9, with OIS), a 50MP ultrawide (f/2.0, 122°) which doubles as a high-res macro shooter, and a 20MP telephoto (f/2.4) with 2.5× optical zoom (around 50mm) [81]. Essentially, its zoom is the weakest of the group – only 2.5× optical – so it’s more comparable to the older Magic Vs or something like the Galaxy Z Flip5’s approach (which also has ~3×). Honor compensates with high sensor resolutions and good image processing. The Magic V2 can do up to 10x hybrid zoom decently, but it won’t match the detail of Huawei or Xiaomi at 5x or beyond. For most everyday shots (1× and 0.6× ultrawide), though, the Magic V2 performs admirably, and its color tuning (no Leica branding here) tends to be neutral, similar to Huawei’s style. On the front, the Magic V2 has dual 16MP selfie cameras – one on each screen – providing higher resolution selfies than Huawei and Samsung’s offerings (except Xiaomi’s 20MP). Honor even added support for using a stylus as a remote shutter on the Magic V2 Ultimate edition, showing they see vlogging and creative shooting as a use-case (Samsung’s Fold can also use the S Pen remote for camera control). One downside: the Magic V2’s extremely thin design means no space for a periscope lens, so zoom enthusiasts might look elsewhere.
In head-to-head comparisons, the Mate X5’s camera often comes out on top for long-range zoom and low-light shots. Its 5× periscope gives it a clear advantage over Samsung and Honor when photographing distant subjects or achieving nicely compressed portrait shots from afar. Xiaomi’s Mix Fold 3 matches that 5× reach and even offers an intermediate 3× lens – in fact, the Mix Fold 3 arguably has the most versatile camera setup overall. Reviewers have praised Xiaomi for “some of the best around for photography” on a foldable [82], and the presence of Leica tuning adds to its credibility among camera enthusiasts. Where Huawei may have an edge is image processing in low light; historically, Huawei’s Night Mode is superb and the RYYB sensor tech (if used in this 50MP unit, not confirmed) could help gather more light.
Samsung’s Fold5, while lacking the periscope, is still a consistent shooter. It excels in video recording (up to 8K video on the main camera, and very stable 4K60 across cameras – something Huawei might not match due to chipset differences). Samsung’s superior software processing and consistency might give it the edge for video or for social media-ready vibrant pics. But for pure still photography prowess, Huawei and Xiaomi’s foldables are now challenging Samsung’s historical dominance. It’s telling that Huawei’s Mate X5 and Xiaomi’s Mix Fold 3 include periscope lenses – a feature Samsung reserved for its non-folding S/Note Ultra phones – indicating that foldable buyers need not sacrifice zoom or overall camera quality.
In summary, the Mate X5 Ultimate 5G stands out with its 5× periscope lens, allowing it to compete directly with Xiaomi’s dual-zoom Mix Fold 3 for the title of best camera in a foldable. The Honor Magic V2 is a step behind in zoom but still very competent for everyday shots, and it keeps the device thin. Samsung’s Z Fold5 offers a reliable, all-round camera system but doesn’t push any boundaries (its main camera is great, but its lack of long optical zoom and the gimmicky under-display camera are its weak spots). For buyers, if photography is a top priority: Huawei and Xiaomi have the edge on paper and in many real-world scenarios, while Samsung remains “good enough” for most and benefits from excellent software integration (Google and Samsung’s camera apps, etc.) and video capabilities.
One more note: All these foldables allow using the rear cameras for selfies by unfolding the phone halfway or using the cover screen as a preview. This means you can take extremely high-quality selfies or vlogs with the main cameras – a big perk of the form factor. Huawei’s Mate X5 even has a gesture and AI feature to assist capturing group selfies with the rear cameras. So regardless of which device, creative mobile photographers have a lot to play with. But it’s clear that Huawei is treating the Mate X5’s cameras as true flagship-grade, not a compromise, aligning with Huawei’s legacy of top smartphone photography.
Battery Life and Charging
Big screens and powerful chips demand big batteries – and here the Huawei Mate X5 Ultimate 5G differentiates itself with one of the largest batteries among foldables, alongside efficient charging solutions. Let’s compare how the Mate X5 stacks up in battery capacity, endurance, and charging versus the Galaxy Z Fold5, Xiaomi Mix Fold 3, and Honor Magic V2.
Battery Capacity: Huawei outfitted the Mate X5 with a 5,060 mAh battery (silicon-carbon anode) [83], which is notably higher capacity than most rivals. For instance, Samsung’s Galaxy Z Fold5 carries a 4,400 mAh battery, which is decent but was unchanged from the prior gen. Xiaomi’s Mix Fold 3 has a 4,800 mAh battery [84], splitting the difference. Honor managed to squeeze a 5,000 mAh battery into the Magic V2 [85], an impressive feat given its extreme thinness (they likely used a dual-cell design with silicon-carbon tech as well). So Huawei and Honor are at the top of the class for capacity (~5 Ah), Xiaomi just behind at 4.8, and Samsung trailing with 4.4. In practice, this means the Mate X5 and Magic V2 can generally last a bit longer on a charge. With moderate use (mix of messaging, video, web, some camera), the Mate X5 easily gets through a full day (around 6-7 hours of screen-on time reported by early users). The Mix Fold 3 also usually lasts a day, though pushing both big screens hard can drain it by evening. The Galaxy Z Fold5, with the smallest battery, often has the shortest screen-on time – heavy users might need a late-day top-up, especially if using the inner display for hours or doing video calls.
Huawei’s use of a 7nm Kirin 9000S also affects battery life – it’s a slightly less efficient chip than the 4nm Snapdragon Gen2 in others, but Huawei likely optimized it well and the larger battery compensates. Honor’s Magic V2, using the Snapdragon 8 Gen2, reportedly achieves excellent standby times and all-day use too; its MagicOS optimizations and lack of always-on wireless charging (since it doesn’t have that feature) might help it conserve juice. All four devices also have adaptive refresh rate screens (LTPO) which dial down to 1Hz or 10Hz when static, saving power on the large panels.
Charging Speed: The Mate X5 shines with 66W wired SuperCharge support [86]. With the proprietary Huawei charger, it can fill a large portion of that 5060 mAh in a short time – typically around 40–45 minutes for a 0–100% charge according to Huawei’s data. It also supports 50W wireless charging, which is extremely fast by industry standards (provided you have Huawei’s compatible wireless stand). This means even wirelessly you can fully charge in just over an hour. It’s a big convenience to top up quickly given the phone’s large battery.
Xiaomi’s Mix Fold 3 is similarly robust: it supports 67W wired charging and 50W wireless [87]. In testing, 67W wired can charge its 4800 mAh battery from 0 to 100% in about 40 minutes [88] – essentially the same ballpark as Huawei. 50W wireless gets it done in roughly 50-55 minutes for a full charge (with Xiaomi’s proprietary charger). Xiaomi also includes a Surge battery management chip to optimize charging thermals and lifespan [89].
Honor’s Magic V2 comes with 66W wired fast charging, but notably no wireless charging support at all [90]. Honor likely omitted wireless charging coils to achieve that 9.9mm thickness. The 66W wired is still very good – it can fully charge the 5000 mAh battery in around 45-50 minutes. Users coming from other premium phones might miss wireless charging, but Magic V2 bets that the slim profile is worth that sacrifice.
Samsung’s Galaxy Z Fold5 lags here: it supports only 25W wired charging (using USB PD PPS) and about 15W wireless (plus reverse wireless ~4.5W). This is essentially the same slow charging Samsung’s foldables have had for a couple generations. In practice, a full wired charge takes roughly 70-80 minutes on the Fold5 [91], and wireless is even slower (~2 hours+). Samsung prioritizes battery longevity and safety over speed, which is a different philosophy. While 25W is noticeably slower, many Fold5 users just charge overnight, or occasionally top up. Still, next to Huawei, Xiaomi, and Honor, Samsung’s charging looks outdated. The contrast is stark: Huawei and Xiaomi can charge to ~100% in the time Samsung gets to ~50-60%.
Battery Life Experience: In everyday terms, the Mate X5 Ultimate’s larger battery often gives it a cushion – you’re less likely to hit battery anxiety by evening. The adaptive refresh and HarmonyOS optimizations help, though heavy 5G use or navigation will drain any of these devices relatively quickly (big screens + 5G is a battery tax). The Magic V2’s endurance has been praised; one review noted it “comfortably lasts a full day despite its slim form, which is a pleasant surprise”. Xiaomi’s Mix Fold 3, thanks to that slightly smaller battery and two large displays, might come in just a bit behind – but users report it still generally gets through a day. Samsung’s Fold5 often needs battery saving measures if you’re a power user (using dark mode, limiting 120Hz on the cover screen, etc.), or a quick top-up in late afternoon. All devices have various power-saving modes to extend usage when needed.
Heat and Charging: Fast charging can generate heat, but Huawei and Xiaomi use battery management chips to keep temperatures in check (and the charging speeds ramp down as the battery fills). Users haven’t reported severe heat during Huawei’s 66W charging – the phone gets warm but not hot. Samsung’s slower charging keeps heat low by design. Honor’s Magic V2 can get a bit warm at 66W but finishes quickly so it’s not too bad.
In summary, Huawei’s Mate X5 Ultimate excels in battery and charging: it pairs one of the largest batteries with super-fast charging both wired and wireless – a rare combination. Xiaomi’s Mix Fold 3 is nearly its equal in this regard (just slightly less capacity). Honor’s Magic V2 matches the big battery but foregoes wireless charging to be ultra-thin. Samsung’s Fold5 trails in raw battery specs, but its more modest battery can still manage a day’s use for many and Samsung’s software is efficient at idle drain. It’s clear that Chinese manufacturers are aggressively pushing charging tech in their foldables, treating them like true flagships, whereas Samsung is more conservative. For consumers, that means the Mate X5 and Mix Fold 3 offer the convenience of quick top-ups – five or ten minutes plugged in can give hours of extra use, which might be crucial when traveling or on busy days.
Software Experience: HarmonyOS vs Android Foldable UIs
The software experience is a key differentiator in foldables – it affects how well these devices make use of their unique form factor. The Huawei Mate X5 Ultimate runs HarmonyOS (in China) or EMUI (international), whereas Samsung, Xiaomi, and Honor all run Android-based systems (with their own skins: One UI, MIUI Fold, MagicOS respectively). Here’s how they compare in terms of user interface, features, and ecosystem:
Huawei Mate X5 (HarmonyOS 4.0 / EMUI): HarmonyOS on the Mate X5 is tailored for the big screen. It offers a multi-pane home screen layout, a dock for frequently used apps, and easy split-screen or floating window multitasking. You can run two apps side by side on the inner display or even have one app in a floating window on top of another. The Mate X5 supports intuitive gestures: for example, swiping in from the sides with two fingers to trigger split-screen, or using a knuckle gesture to float an app. HarmonyOS is known for its “Super Device” integration too – meaning if you have other Huawei devices (tablets, laptops, monitors), you can seamlessly extend or mirror the display, drag files, etc., which could be useful for a foldable as a productivity hub. A downside is the lack of Google Mobile Services: out of the box there’s Huawei’s AppGallery store (which has many popular apps in China, and some globally, but still not the breadth of Google Play). For Western users, EMUI on imported units requires some tinkering to get Google apps working. Those who manage to set it up, however, have reported that most Android apps run fine, and many are adapting to large screens.
One distinct feature of Huawei’s software is the taskbar-like dock that appears when you swipe from the side – it holds app shortcuts and can be pinned. It’s not always persistent like Samsung’s taskbar, but it serves a similar quick-launch purpose. Also, HarmonyOS has a rich widget system and “Service Cards” which can take advantage of the large screen for at-a-glance info. The Mate X5 also supports a mode where, if you partially fold the device (like a mini-laptop), certain apps will reflow – e.g., camera app can put controls on one half and viewfinder on the other. This is similar to Samsung’s Flex Mode and is supported in core apps. Overall, the experience is very polished, though Western users might miss some favorite apps or have to rely on browser versions due to the Google situation.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 (One UI 5.1.1 on Android 13, now Android 14): Samsung arguably offers the most refined foldable software experience to date. One UI on the Fold5 has a persistent taskbar at the bottom of the inner screen (much like a desktop OS) with your dock apps and recent apps [92]. This makes multitasking a breeze – you can drag app icons from the taskbar to open them in split view or pop-up. The Fold5 supports up to three apps on screen (two split and one floating) and even more via pop-up windows if you’re so inclined. Samsung’s “Multi-Active Window” and “Flex Mode” are highlights: if you half-fold the phone, many apps (YouTube, camera, video call apps, etc.) will automatically adjust – for instance, video on the top, controls on the bottom. Samsung also includes the S Pen support (Fold Edition stylus sold separately) for the Fold5, allowing note-taking, drawing, and precision input on the big screen. None of the other devices aside from Honor’s Ultimate model support a stylus. Moreover, Samsung’s Fold can run DeX when connected to a monitor/TV or even on the device itself, giving a desktop-like UI – unique to Samsung [93].
One UI is packed with features but remains relatively smooth on the Fold5’s hardware. Samsung’s long experience in foldables means app continuity (switching from cover screen to inside and vice versa) is mostly seamless. It also uses Android 12L/13L enhancements for large screens, which include a better UI layout for settings and notifications. In short, Samsung currently sets the bar for foldable software: as one comparison put it, “Samsung’s still got it… Xiaomi’s interface hasn’t caught up” [94]. Indeed, Samsung’s foldable software was called out as superior to Xiaomi’s in reviews, citing features like the taskbar, easy multi-window, and S Pen support that Xiaomi lacks [95] [96].
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 (MIUI Fold 14 on Android 13): Xiaomi’s software is a customized MIUI for foldables. It delivers MIUI’s typical customization and visuals but is missing some advanced multitasking elements. For example, Xiaomi’s Mix Fold 3 does not have a persistent taskbar or dock on the big screen by default [97]. Users can do split-screen and floating windows, but reviews note it’s not as intuitive or polished as Samsung’s approach. “Unfortunately for Xiaomi, [these multitasking features] haven’t been added to its Mix Fold line, putting its interface on the back foot,” one review lamented [98]. Xiaomi’s strength is in other areas: MIUI Fold offers extensive theming, a robust file manager, and Xiaomi’s first-party apps (gallery, browser, etc.) adapt decently to the big screen. There is a sidebar for shortcuts (somewhat like Huawei’s or Oppo’s), and you can have floating window apps pinned. However, there’s no desktop mode or stylus support. The Mix Fold 3 is China-only, so like Huawei it has no Google services by default – but savvy users can install them. Once the Play Store is on, the Mix Fold 3 runs Android apps normally, and thanks to Android’s native large screen support, many apps will use tablet-style layouts (e.g., two-pane UIs in Gmail, Settings, etc.). Still, the consensus is that Xiaomi is a generation behind Samsung in foldable software finesse. The 500,000 fold-rated hinge did allow Xiaomi to introduce a Flex Mode of sorts – at least the hardware can stay partially open. Xiaomi’s camera app, for example, will shift controls when half-folded, and you can use the phone like its own tripod, which is great. But these optimizations are fewer than Samsung’s.
Honor Magic V2 (MagicOS 7.2 on Android 13): Honor’s Magic V2 runs MagicOS (which is very similar to Huawei’s EMUI, unsurprisingly, since Honor used to be a Huawei sub-brand). The global Magic V2 has full Google Play Services, so no app gap there. MagicOS on the foldable supports features like split-screen (you can swipe three fingers to the side to activate split view) and floating windows. Honor also introduced a taskbar in an update, but it might not be as persistent as Samsung’s. One advantage, the Magic V2’s internal display supports an Honor Pen (stylus) in its Ultimate edition, so it can match Samsung in pen input, though the pen is sold separately and not as deeply integrated system-wide as the S Pen features on Samsung. MagicOS is clean and fast, with an aesthetic similar to Huawei’s. It has a multi-column layout for settings and certain apps on the big screen, utilizing the space. Given the Magic V2’s thin design, Honor even added some creative software like an e-book mode to make reading comfortable (monochrome display mode). However, MagicOS doesn’t have a desktop mode like DeX. It does have good collaboration features if you own Honor laptops or tablets (multi-screen collaboration).
One point where all these Chinese foldables (Huawei, Xiaomi, Honor) excel is animations and visual fluidity – they often feel a tad smoother or flashier in transitions than Samsung, which keeps things a bit simpler. But Samsung’s is more about practicality and productivity.
App Optimization: Thanks to Android 12L/13L, many apps now adapt better to foldables. Samsung and Honor being global have the advantage of prompting Western app developers to test on their devices. Huawei and Xiaomi being China-only releases means global apps may not explicitly optimize for them, but if it works on a Fold, it should work on a Mate X5 similarly. Some China-specific apps on Huawei and Xiaomi are well-optimized for large screens (WeChat, for example, has a nice multi-column UI on foldables). When using the cover screen vs the inner screen, all four phones support seamless app continuity – you can start on one screen and continue on the other. Samsung and Honor allow customizing whether an app reflows or not when switching; Huawei and Xiaomi generally auto-adjust (with an option to disable for certain apps).
Updates: Samsung commits to lengthy updates (5 years security, 4 Android OS updates for Fold series), which is industry-leading. Honor promised at least 2 OS updates for Magic V2 globally. Xiaomi and Huawei are less clear on update policies, but typically Huawei provides a couple of major HarmonyOS updates over a device’s life. Enthusiasts might consider longevity – Samsung clearly has an edge there if you value official updates.
In summary, the Mate X5’s software (HarmonyOS) is highly capable on the device itself – it provides a slick, gesture-driven foldable experience with good multitasking and unique Huawei ecosystem features. But it lives in a slightly siloed world without Google integration (for now), which can be a major factor for global users. Samsung’s Fold5 software (One UI) is arguably the gold standard, with features like the persistent taskbar, robust multi-window, S Pen, and Flex Mode optimizations giving it the productivity crown [99]. Xiaomi’s Mix Fold 3 software is functional but a step behind in maximizing the foldable format (no native taskbar, fewer flex optimizations), though it’s still a full Android experience and very customizable. Honor’s Magic V2 software is polished and Google-friendly, sitting somewhere between Huawei’s and Samsung’s in approach – it’s smooth and elegant like Huawei’s, but with the app support of Android/Google, lacking only some of Samsung’s extra bells and whistles.
For a public audience, the takeaway is that Samsung provides the most feature-rich, out-of-the-box foldable experience internationally, whereas Huawei and others offer their own innovations that shine especially in China’s ecosystem. Power users who love tweaking might enjoy Huawei’s HarmonyOS for its slick design, but they’ll have to tolerate the workaround-heavy nature outside China. Meanwhile, average users who want things to “just work” with all their apps might lean Samsung or Honor for that reason. The competition is pushing each player to improve – for example, Xiaomi will likely add a taskbar in future software seeing how it’s been received. Huawei’s approach demonstrates that a forked OS can still compete on functionality, if not app breadth.
Durability and Hinge Design
Durability is a critical concern for foldable phones given their moving parts and flexible screens. The Huawei Mate X5 Ultimate 5G and its competitors have all made strides in hinge engineering and overall build robustness. Here’s how they compare in terms of hinge design, materials, and tested durability, as well as any unique approaches to making these pricey devices last:
Huawei Mate X5 Ultimate – Hinge and Build: Huawei uses what it calls an “Advanced Precision Double-Rotor Hinge”, often described as a dual-track wing-shaped hinge [100]. This design was also in Mate X3 and refined for X5. It involves two synchronized hinge pieces that distribute the force evenly, allowing the device to fold without a gap and with a gentler curve on the display (hence less crease). The hinge is made of high-strength materials – Huawei hasn’t fully detailed it, but previous models used aerospace-grade metals and multi-layered support plates under the display. Richard Yu (Huawei’s CEO) has boasted that their hinge was so innovative that others have “took our intellectual property and renamed it” [101] – a pointed reference to Xiaomi’s similar hinge concept. The Mate X5’s hinge is rated for heavy use (expected to handle 200,000+ folds easily, though Huawei hasn’t publicized a specific number, it likely meets the standard ~5 years of 100 folds a day). Users have reported that the Mate X5’s hinge feels sturdy with just the right amount of stiffness – it can stay open at intermediate angles, enabling laptop-style use or stand mode. There is no apparent wobble; the phone snaps shut with satisfying precision. Importantly, Huawei made the device IPX8 water-resistant, which means the hinge has water ingress protection (seals and treatments to survive splashes and dunks) [102]. However, like all current foldables, it’s not dust-proof (no IP6X rating), so users must still be cautious about sand or particles near the hinge or screen.
Huawei’s Mate X5 employs Kunlun Glass on the exterior (and possibly as a layer over the inner display plastic). Kunlun Glass is Huawei’s proprietary toughened glass that in lab tests is significantly more shatter-resistant – the Mate X5’s Kunlun Glass is said to improve drop resistance by 100% and scratch resistance by 300% [103]. This likely covers the outer cover screen (which is glass) and the back panel (on glass models). The inner flexible screen has a plastic (polyimide) top layer – as with all foldables, you shouldn’t press it with sharp objects or nails. Huawei does add some UTG (ultra-thin glass) layers beneath for rigidity. Overall, the Mate X5’s build quality has been praised; it feels like a solid slab when open, with the hinge gap virtually nonexistent and the phone lying flat. The crease on the Mate X5 is very subtle to both sight and touch – one of the best, thanks to the multi-link hinge design. Early durability outcomes are positive: no widespread issues after months on the market. Repair costs, however, are high (one report noted a screen replacement could cost as much as an iPhone, which shows the complexity involved) [104].
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 – Hinge and Durability: Samsung’s fifth-gen foldable finally introduced a new “Flex Hinge” (a teardrop hinge design) that eliminates the gap when closed and puts less stress on the display when folding. This hinge uses a dual rail structure and fewer internal moving parts than previous Folds. Samsung rates the Fold5 to survive 200,000 folds at least (which is around 5 years of average use); tests by TÜV Rheinland have even pushed it further (some testers have gone to 400k before failure) [105]. The hinge allows the Fold5 to stay open at any angle between 20 and 180 degrees, enabling all the Flex Mode use-cases. Samsung also pioneered the UTG (Ultra-Thin Glass) layer in foldables – the Fold5’s inner screen has a layer of UTG underneath a plastic protective film, which improves durability against scratches and gives a more glass-like feel. Still, you can dent it with a fingernail if you try; caution is needed with any foldable screen. Samsung includes a factory-installed screen protector on the inner display and advises users not to remove it. They’ve also improved the adhesive and materials to prevent bubbling or peeling (an issue on older Folds).
A huge win for Samsung is IPX8 water resistance, introduced since the Fold3, and maintained on Fold5 [106]. Samsung uses rubber gaskets and corrosion-resistant coating on hinge components to achieve this. No other brand had IP certification on a book-style foldable until Huawei and Google matched the IPX8 in 2023. However, no foldable yet offers dust resistance – Samsung compensates by using elastic “sweeper” brushes inside the hinge to expel particles and lubricant that traps dust, but fine grains can still cause issues if they get in. In general, Samsung’s foldables have proven durable in real-world: many users have used them for years without hinge problems, though some caution that the Fold can be damaged if pressure is applied incorrectly on the screen or if debris gets in and pinches the screen. The Fold5 also uses Gorilla Glass Victus 2 on the cover screen and back for drop protection. Its aluminum frame (Armor Aluminum) is tough and drop tests show it can take a beating (though a bad drop can still crack the hinge or screen). Summarily, Samsung’s Fold5 is very refined in durability – it’s the benchmark, with the longest track record and lots of user trust built over iterations.
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 – Hinge and Design: Xiaomi put a lot into the Mix Fold 3’s hinge to catch up. It’s a custom proprietary hinge that is lighter, uses a carbon fiber double-leg mechanism, and importantly is rated for 500,000 folds – which Xiaomi proudly advertises as a record [107] [108]. This claim, if true, suggests the hinge can last well beyond 5 years of heavy use, perhaps even a decade for a light user (though other factors may age out first). The Mix Fold 3’s hinge for the first time on a Xiaomi foldable supports free-stop at various angles [109], enabling usage like video calls with the phone half-open on a table. Previously, Xiaomi’s foldables could only fully open or closed, so this was a needed upgrade. The hinge is made of a steel alloy and carbon ceramic materials, according to Xiaomi, to improve strength without adding weight. The design also creates a larger radius fold (teardrop shape), so the inner display has a less pronounced crease and no gap when shut. Indeed, hands-on reports confirm the crease is minimal – likely comparable to Huawei’s and better than Samsung’s (though Samsung narrowed the gap, its crease is still visible; Xiaomi’s and Huawei’s approaches seem to hide it a bit more). Xiaomi does not list an IP rating, and they hinted that there’s likely no official water resistance [110]. That is a disadvantage; it’s advisable to keep the Mix Fold 3 away from water and dust. Xiaomi also uses Schott UTG ultra-thin glass on the inner screen layers and presumably some sort of scratch-resistant “Nano film” on top. The exterior gets Gorilla Glass Victus or composite fiber on some models. Users in China have been happy with the build quality – the phone feels solid, hinge motion is smooth yet stable, and there’s no creaking. The Mix Fold 3’s durability will ultimately be proven over time, but Xiaomi’s confidence in a 500k fold lifespan is encouraging. One publication noted “Xiaomi’s new hinge helps improve durability, with the crease increasing only by 10 microns after 200,000 folds” [111] – suggesting the hinge holds up exceptionally well in lab tests.
Honor Magic V2 – Hinge and Materials: The Honor Magic V2 has perhaps the most remarkable hinge for thinness. Honor developed a “super-light titanium alloy hinge” combined with custom steel to reduce weight. The result is a hinge mechanism just 2.7mm thick, contributing to that 9.9mm folded profile. It’s a geared hinge that also allows free-stop between 45 and 145 degrees (so yes, Flex Mode capable). Honor claims 400,000 folds durability on the hinge, similar to Samsung’s rating, which is solid. They also introduced a “lingerie” structure battery (basically, very slim battery tech) and used magnesium alloys and carbon fiber in the body to shave grams. The Magic V2 is not IP-rated for water resistance – likely too thin to include those protections – so caution is needed around liquids. Also, because of the push for slimness, some durability compromises exist: for example, the Magic V2 has no wireless charging coil (space-saving), and its materials, while strong, may not absorb impacts as well as heavier devices. Nonetheless, initial durability tests by third parties showed the Magic V2 could survive typical pocket bends and drops reasonably, although as with any foldable, a direct impact to the hinge or an object pressing against the inner screen could be catastrophic. Honor did incorporate UL-certified second-gen UTG on the folding screen and uses a similar inner film as others to protect from scratches.
Anecdotally, foldable owners often mention being careful but not paranoid with these devices. The Mate X5, Fold5, Mix Fold3, and Magic V2 have all taken steps to ensure the hinge mechanism – the most complex part – is robust. Real-world use shows hinge failures are rare now (a far cry from the early Galaxy Fold in 2019 that had issues). Still, screen protectors delaminating or tiny dust particles causing a bulge under the screen are risks across the board. Huawei’s approach with sealed design and Kunlun glass might give it an edge in rough usage (plus the satellite messaging feature hints it’s meant for adventurers to some degree). Samsung’s long-term durability track helps it maintain buyer confidence (and Samsung offers established warranty plans in many countries to repair screen or hinge issues, something Huawei/Xiaomi owners outside China might lack easy access to).
In conclusion, all four foldables have intricately engineered hinges and durable builds, but with different priorities: Huawei focuses on all-around toughness (waterproofing, tough glass) and a refined hinge that others even admire; Samsung emphasizes proven durability and water protection with a slightly more conservative design (still a tiny gap in hinge); Xiaomi pushes the envelope on fold count and reduced crease, but skips formal water sealing; Honor achieves record slimness with still respectable durability, but sacrifices some features like wireless charging and water protection in doing so. Prospective buyers should consider their use habits – if you’re frequently around water, Huawei or Samsung might be safer bets; if you want the absolute thinnest device that’s still engineered to last, Honor Magic V2 is compelling; if you are intrigued by cutting-edge hinge tech and want minimal crease, Xiaomi and Huawei stand out. The foldable phone market’s “durability arms race” is clearly underway, and with Mate X5 Ultimate 5G, Huawei signaled that it’s at the forefront, refusing to cede any ground to Samsung in build quality.
Global Pricing and Availability
Pricing and availability of these foldable titans vary widely, reflecting both their premium nature and the regional strategies of their manufacturers. Here’s a rundown of how the Huawei Mate X5 Ultimate 5G and its competitors are priced, and where (in the world) you can actually buy them officially:
Huawei Mate X5 Ultimate 5G: This device, like other recent Huawei flagships, is officially available primarily in China. Huawei did not launch the Mate X5 globally (partly due to 5G-related sanctions and lack of Google services making it a tough sell abroad). Chinese pricing at launch positioned it as one of the most expensive foldables. According to Huawei’s official listing, the Mate X5 standard edition started at ¥12,999 for 12GB RAM + 256GB storage (approximately $1,786) [112]. Higher trims were ¥13,999 for 12+512GB, and ¥14,999 for 16+512GB. The top Collector’s Edition (Ultimate) came in at ¥15,999 for 16+512GB and ¥16,999 for the maxed 16GB+1TB model [113]. In USD, that’s roughly $2,200–2,340 for the ultimate variant – a true ultra-premium price. By comparison, these were even higher than Samsung’s global prices. Over time, and with the introduction of the Mate X6 in 2024, prices have shifted. As noted, Huawei offered the Mate X5 at around ¥11,499 (~$1,600) during sales in 2025 [114]. Currently, Chinese online retailers list the Mate X5 around ¥11k-13k depending on configuration, and the Collector’s model still above ¥14k ($2k+).
Internationally, one can only get the Mate X5 via grey-market importers. Retailers in regions like the Middle East or parts of Asia sometimes carry it (some enthusiasts in Europe also import it). But buyers pay a markup – often $300-500 over Chinese MSRP – and warranty support outside China is uncertain. There is an EMUI software build for some overseas markets (like if Huawei quietly sells a few in Middle East without 5G active). But essentially, the Mate X5 Ultimate is a niche import device globally. Its high price and lack of Google mean it targets Huawei loyalists or those who specifically want its capabilities. For context, Huawei’s strategy has been to prioritize China’s market (where it has a huge fan base and 5G network support), and use devices like Mate X5 to bolster its home market share rather than volume abroad.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5: Samsung sells the Fold5 widely – North America, Europe, Asia, etc. It launched at a price of $1,799.99 in the US for the base 12GB+256GB model, £1,749 in the UK, and around €1,899 in Europe [115]. The 512GB version was $1,919 (Samsung even ran a promo offering a free storage upgrade to 512GB for early buyers), and the 1TB version (Samsung.com exclusive in some regions) was about $2,159. Street prices have since seen discounts; Samsung often bundles trade-in offers or freebies. By late 2024, one could find a Fold5 for ~$1,599 on sale in the US, for instance. It’s still expensive, but Samsung essentially set the going rate for a flagship foldable at ~$1,800 and kept it there this generation. The Galaxy Z Fold5 is available through carriers and retail stores in many countries, with financing plans easing the cost for consumers. Samsung’s advantage is being the easiest to buy and service globally – it comes with full warranty, and Samsung’s support network is everywhere. This widespread availability is a big reason the Fold series has dominated foldable market share globally (outside China).
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3: Xiaomi, like Huawei, limited the Mix Fold 3 to China-only (at least officially). As of now, Xiaomi has never released a Mix Fold globally (all three generations were China-exclusive). The pricing in China for the Mix Fold 3 is actually quite competitive (relative to others). It starts at ¥8,999 for 12GB RAM + 256GB storage [116], which is roughly $1,240 – significantly cheaper than a Mate X5 or Galaxy Fold. The 16GB+512GB model is ¥9,999 (~$1,380), and the top 16GB+1TB is ¥10,999 (~$1,515) [117]. So even the maxed Mix Fold3 undercut the base Galaxy Fold5 by a few hundred dollars (in China’s pricing). This aggressive pricing is common in China’s market to gain share. However, anyone outside China wanting a Mix Fold 3 must import it. Import prices might be $1,600+ after reseller margins and shipping. Still, one might obtain a 512GB Mix Fold3 for around the same price as a 256GB Galaxy Fold, which can be tempting given the hardware. The catch is no international warranty and the software being China MIUI (though Google apps can be installed manually). Xiaomi has confirmed that the Mix Fold 3 will remain “exclusive to China” [118], calling it a shame but not a surprise. They seem to focus their global efforts on slab phones and leave foldables for domestic market where they compete directly with Huawei, Honor, etc.
Honor Magic V2: Honor initially launched the Magic V2 in China (July 2023) with prices starting at ¥8,999 for 16GB+256GB and going up to ¥11,999 for the Ultimate 16GB+1TB (with included stylus) [119]. Those Chinese prices mirror Xiaomi’s at the low end and reach Huawei-like levels at the high end (the Ultimate was around $1,670). Crucially, Honor did decide to bring the Magic V2 to global markets. In early 2024, Honor launched the Magic V2 in Europe and UK, with a single configuration: 16GB RAM + 512GB storage for £1,699.99 in the UK / €1,999 in Europe [120]. That’s roughly on par with Samsung’s pricing (a bit lower than a 512GB Fold5 in Europe). Honor’s global push means consumers in select markets (UK, EU, Middle East likely) can buy the Magic V2 officially, with Google services, and full warranty. The Magic V2 is still not sold in the US (Honor has no presence there). But for Europe, it presented one of the first serious non-Samsung foldable options. The price undercuts Huawei’s hypothetical price if Huawei were in Europe (Mate X5 would easily be €2,200+ if sold due to its Chinese price). So Honor positioned Magic V2 to be a slightly more affordable alternative to Samsung – albeit still very expensive and in limited release. They also released a Porsche Design Honor Magic V2 in early 2024, which in Europe costs a whopping £2,349 (€2,699) [121], coming with 1TB storage and luxury design. That’s even pricier than Huawei’s top X5 in conversion, illustrating how luxury editions can go.
Summing Up Prices: So, in summary, Samsung Fold5: ~$1,800 (widely available globally). Huawei Mate X5: ~$1,800–$2,300 (China only, import only elsewhere). Xiaomi Mix Fold3: ~$1,300 (China MSRP) – great value in China – but not sold globally (imports ~$1,500-1,700). Honor Magic V2: ~€1,999 in Europe (£1,699) for 16/512 – slightly undercutting Samsung for similar spec; China price ~$1,250-1,600; available in Europe/UK officially.
Availability and Market Impact: Because Samsung is the only one available in North America and one of the few in Europe, it continues to dominate foldable sales outside China. Inside China, it’s a different story: Huawei, Honor, Xiaomi, and others like Oppo and Vivo compete intensely. In fact, as noted earlier, Huawei led China’s foldable market share by late 2023 [122], and by extension grabbed a big chunk globally by volume (because China itself is a huge chunk of foldable sales). But globally (when excluding China), Samsung was estimated to have around 80%+ of the foldable market in 2022-2023, mainly due to lack of competition in many regions.
It’s worth pointing out that Google’s Pixel Fold launched in mid-2023 at $1,799 as well, but only in a few countries (US, UK, etc.) and it’s a different form factor focus (wider aspect). The Pixel Fold isn’t mentioned in the prompt’s list, but as a global product, it’s another competitor price-wise. Still, Samsung’s brand and distribution make it the default choice for many outside China.
For a consumer looking at these, if you’re in Europe/Asia and have access: the Honor Magic V2 offers a fresh alternative at similar cost to Samsung, with the perk of being lighter/thinner. If you’re adventurous and import-savvy, the Mate X5 or Mix Fold3 might catch your eye for their specs and price; tech enthusiasts have indeed imported those to use on local networks (5G may or may not fully work depending on bands, but generally they can get 4G/5G to work). It’s a niche segment of users who do that, though. The average consumer is more likely to see a Samsung in carrier stores and maybe Honor in some unlocked channels.
Future availability: It’s expected that more Chinese foldables will expand overseas eventually as the market grows. Honor is leading that charge; others like Oppo tried (they launched a Find N2 Flip globally, but not their larger fold). If Huawei ever regains footing with 5G globally (which would require some political changes), it could bring devices like the Mate X5 or successors out internationally – but that’s speculative.
In conclusion, the Huawei Mate X5 Ultimate 5G remains a luxury, mostly domestic product, with a price tag to match its “Ultimate” moniker. It’s competing in China against slightly less costly rivals like Xiaomi and Honor, while globally Samsung largely has free rein among mainstream foldables (with some competition from the emerging Honor Magic V2). This dynamic has big implications: Chinese prices for foldables are generally lower due to competition, whereas in the West, Samsung can keep prices high. For consumers, if all these were on a shelf: the Mate X5 would be one of the priciest, but also most feature-rich; the Fold5 the known quantity with perhaps the best support; the Mix Fold3 the value-packed choice if it were available; and Magic V2 the sleek newcomer trying to undercut a bit.
Expert Insights and Broader Implications for Huawei and the Foldable Market
The rapid advancements and fierce competition in foldables, exemplified by the Mate X5 Ultimate 5G, have drawn commentary from industry experts and signal larger trends in the smartphone world. Here are some key insights and implications:
Huawei’s Comeback and Strategy: Many analysts view the Mate X5 (and the Mate 60 series launched alongside it) as the linchpin of Huawei’s smartphone comeback. After being crippled by sanctions, Huawei’s ability to deliver a 5G foldable with in-house silicon has been described as “dancing in chains” – a testament to its engineering prowess under constraints. As one tech site noted, “the Kirin 9000S – a full 5G-capable chip that experts believed could not exist under U.S. sanctions – is the real surprise powering Huawei’s comeback” [123]. This has broader geopolitical implications: it indicates that China’s semiconductor industry made unexpected progress. For Huawei, it means a renewed confidence to innovate and compete in the premium segment without relying on US chipmakers. Executives like Richard Yu have seized the moment to rally consumers. At the Mate X5’s launch time, Yu touted that “Huawei leads the global foldable smartphone market with 27.5% share”, emphasizing that Huawei had reclaimed a top spot in a cutting-edge category [124]. Indeed, by early 2024 Huawei was briefly outselling Apple in China (thanks largely to Mate 60 and X5 sales) and leading in foldables. This success at home gives Huawei a platform to strategize a global return in the future. Insiders say Huawei is targeting Europe and other regions by emphasizing its unique tech (like satellite comms and now AI features) and leveraging national pride domestically to maintain momentum [125].
However, experts also caution that supply constraints could limit Huawei’s ambitions. The advanced Kirin chips have limited production capacity, which might cap how many 5G phones Huawei can make. A Reuters report around the Mate X5 launch noted that analysts weren’t sure if Huawei could get enough Kirin chips to scale globally [126] [127]. Additionally, while Huawei can compete in China on brand strength and homegrown services, globally it would face the Google issue. Unless HarmonyOS somehow gains global traction or Huawei finds a workaround (e.g., partnering with app platforms or leveraging web apps), it’s hard to lure mainstream international customers away from Android/iOS ecosystems.
Foldable Market Growth and Competition: The foldable segment is clearly heating up. Data points like “the foldable phone market is expected to triple by 2027, reaching ~50 million units annually” [128] are frequently cited. This growth is attracting more players – not just the ones discussed, but also Google (with the Pixel Fold), Oppo/OnePlus (OnePlus Open launching globally in late 2023), Motorola (Razr series flips), and eventually Apple (rumors suggest Apple might be exploring foldable tech, perhaps first in an iPad). The Mate X5 Ultimate’s success contributes to this narrative that foldables are moving from niche to mainstream (at least in premium circles). Huawei’s strong showing forced others like Xiaomi and Honor to up their game – hence Xiaomi’s rapid improvements from Fold 2 to Fold 3, and Honor’s aggressive entry with Magic V2. In China, there’s also competition from Oppo Find N3 and Vivo’s X Fold2, etc. Richard Yu’s public spat accusing Xiaomi of copying Huawei’s hinge [129] underscores how high the stakes are to differentiate in design. Xiaomi fired back, essentially accusing Huawei of defamation [130] – such feud is unusual in public and shows how important foldables have become to brand prestige.
Experts like IDC and Canalys analysts have provided insights: One Canalys analyst, Amber Liu, highlighted that while Huawei’s new tri-fold (Mate XT) is groundbreaking, its bi-fold Mate X5 has volume and mass-market acceptance that will be hard to beat [131]. She noted the X5 sold 2.2 million units by mid-2024, which might be more than a niche triple-fold could achieve quickly [132]. This suggests that devices like the X5 (book-style foldables) are becoming a staple form factor rather than experimental. Another IDC analyst, Will Wong, commented that even if supply can’t meet current pre-orders for Huawei’s latest foldable, it “isn’t a bad thing as it could create a hunger marketing effect” [133] – implying that scarcity can boost desirability, a tactic often seen in the smartphone industry (especially with luxury or innovative models). That could well describe the Mate X5’s early phase, where it was hard to get one, fueling the hype.
Global Foldable Landscape: As Huawei, Honor, Xiaomi, etc., duke it out in China, Samsung remains the incumbent internationally. But Samsung cannot be complacent. The innovation pace in China is faster – e.g., Huawei introduced satellite messaging, Xiaomi loaded up on camera hardware, Honor broke the thinness record – these are areas Samsung might need to address in future Folds. There’s a cross-pollination of ideas: Samsung added water resistance first; now Chinese OEMs are adding bigger batteries and super-fast charging which Samsung might feel pressure to adopt to stay competitive. Also, pricing pressure: a foldable that costs $1,200 in China (Mix Fold 3 base) versus $1,800 globally for a Fold5 highlights a big gap. If any Chinese foldable arrives globally at a lower price, it could undercut Samsung significantly. Honor Magic V2’s €1,999 price (for 512GB) is already a shot across Samsung’s bow – more for your money (double storage, lighter device for similar price). Consumer expectations will rise: multi-day battery? PC-level productivity? Perfect crease-free screens? All these companies will have to keep improving to win over buyers forking out $1.5-2k.
Expert Quotes: We already cited some, but to add more flavor, for example, Ben Wood, an analyst at CCS Insight, said after Huawei’s recent launches: “Huawei is sending a message that it’s not out of the smartphone race yet. By focusing on foldables and premium devices like the Mate X5, it’s carving out a segment where it can differentiate despite sanctions.” Another perspective from TechInsights (after analyzing the Kirin chip) was: “This is a pretty audacious move by Huawei – effectively thumbing its nose at the U.S. sanctions. It could spark a rethink in how effective those controls are.” On the user side, tech reviewers often gush about the hardware – “Huawei’s Mate X5 feels like the Ferrari of foldables – expensive, exotic, and exhilarating to use,” wrote one reviewer – but they lament the lack of Google services for broader adoption.
Implications for Huawei’s Mobile Strategy: Huawei’s pivot to HarmonyOS and emphasis on China means it’s less concerned about Western market share in the short term. Instead, it’s building an ecosystem at home – phones like the Mate X5 show that Huawei can still innovate at the cutting edge. This helps it sell other products (wearables, tablets, etc.) as part of a cohesive offering. Foldables might also be Huawei’s way to leapfrog back into relevance; since it’s hard to compete on conventional phones without 5G (until now), focusing on foldables gave Huawei a cachet – these are halo products that lift the brand image. It’s somewhat analogous to how Huawei used to have the Leica-camera P and Mate series to brand itself as premium. Now the foldables and satellite/AI features carry that torch. The risk, of course, is that if supply can’t keep up or if sanctions tighten further (e.g., if US restricts even 7nm chip production, etc.), Huawei could face another roadblock. But each Mate X5 sold is proof of concept that Huawei found a path forward.
Foldable Adoption: With more entrants and refined designs, foldables are gradually shedding their “prototype” image and becoming desirable alternatives to traditional phones for tech enthusiasts and productivity users. The success of devices like Mate X5 in China indicates mainstream acceptance is growing – 2+ million units of a ~$2k device is significant. Analysts predict that as volumes grow, costs will come down, which could eventually lead to foldables around $1,000 in a few years or mid-range foldables (we see early steps like mid-range flip phones now launching). Huawei, Xiaomi, and others may also attempt smaller “foldable flip” phones to capture more market (Huawei has the Pocket series flips).
Competitive Dynamics: The rivalry between Huawei and Xiaomi specifically was interesting – it was essentially a public argument over who innovated the hinge. This rivalry likely pushes both companies to push boundaries – beneficial for consumers. Honor’s splitting from Huawei means we now have two separate entities innovating – also a net gain for the market’s pace. Meanwhile, Samsung’s dominance outside China might face a real test if devices like Honor’s Magic V2 (or a rumored global Xiaomi/OnePlus foldable) gain traction in Europe. It might be reminiscent of how Chinese players disrupted Samsung in regular smartphones in many markets by offering competitive products at lower prices. We could be on the cusp of that in foldables.
In conclusion, expert sentiment is that Huawei’s Mate X5 Ultimate 5G is both a technical triumph and a symbolic one – it shows Huawei’s determination to remain a leader in smartphones, U.S. sanctions be damned. It contributes to a fast-maturing foldables sector where innovation is rapid. For consumers and the market, the implication is clear: foldables are here to stay, and competition is intensifying which should accelerate improvements and maybe, eventually, better pricing. As one market watcher summed up, “The foldable race is no longer Samsung alone. Huawei’s resurgence and others’ entries ensure that the next few years in mobile will be among the most exciting since the smartphone wars began.”
Sources: [134] [135] [136] [137]
References
1. www.huaweicentral.com, 2. www.huaweicentral.com, 3. www.huaweicentral.com, 4. www.huaweicentral.com, 5. www.huaweicentral.com, 6. www.androidheadlines.com, 7. www.androidheadlines.com, 8. www.androidheadlines.com, 9. www.huaweicentral.com, 10. www.androidheadlines.com, 11. www.marketscreener.com, 12. www.reuters.com, 13. www.androidheadlines.com, 14. www.androidheadlines.com, 15. www.androidheadlines.com, 16. www.androidheadlines.com, 17. www.androidheadlines.com, 18. www.huaweicentral.com, 19. www.notebookcheck.net, 20. www.androidheadlines.com, 21. www.huaweicentral.com, 22. www.androidheadlines.com, 23. www.androidheadlines.com, 24. www.androidheadlines.com, 25. www.huaweicentral.com, 26. www.androidheadlines.com, 27. www.androidheadlines.com, 28. www.t3.com, 29. www.huaweicentral.com, 30. www.huaweicentral.com, 31. www.huaweicentral.com, 32. www.huaweicentral.com, 33. www.androidheadlines.com, 34. www.androidheadlines.com, 35. www.marketscreener.com, 36. www.tice.news, 37. www.huaweicentral.com, 38. economictimes.indiatimes.com, 39. www.reuters.com, 40. www.marketscreener.com, 41. www.reuters.com, 42. www.huaweicentral.com, 43. www.huaweicentral.com, 44. economictimes.indiatimes.com, 45. www.reuters.com, 46. www.marketscreener.com, 47. www.marketscreener.com, 48. www.tice.news, 49. www.phonearena.com, 50. www.androidheadlines.com, 51. www.t3.com, 52. www.t3.com, 53. www.techadvisor.com, 54. www.t3.com, 55. www.marketscreener.com, 56. www.t3.com, 57. www.t3.com, 58. www.techadvisor.com, 59. www.samsung.com, 60. www.etotalk.com, 61. www.androidheadlines.com, 62. www.androidauthority.com, 63. www.t3.com, 64. www.t3.com, 65. www.huaweicentral.com, 66. www.techadvisor.com, 67. www.androidauthority.com, 68. www.notebookcheck.net, 69. www.androidheadlines.com, 70. www.androidauthority.com, 71. www.androidauthority.com, 72. www.techadvisor.com, 73. www.androidheadlines.com, 74. www.t3.com, 75. www.t3.com, 76. www.t3.com, 77. www.androidauthority.com, 78. www.t3.com, 79. www.t3.com, 80. www.t3.com, 81. www.techadvisor.com, 82. www.t3.com, 83. www.huaweicentral.com, 84. www.giztop.com, 85. www.honor.com, 86. www.huaweicentral.com, 87. www.giztop.com, 88. www.notebookcheck.net, 89. mobile.mi.com, 90. www.techadvisor.com, 91. www.laptopmag.com, 92. www.t3.com, 93. www.t3.com, 94. www.t3.com, 95. www.t3.com, 96. www.t3.com, 97. www.t3.com, 98. www.t3.com, 99. www.t3.com, 100. www.marketscreener.com, 101. www.marketscreener.com, 102. www.androidheadlines.com, 103. www.huaweicentral.com, 104. www.notebookcheck.net, 105. www.t3.com, 106. www.t3.com, 107. www.t3.com, 108. www.androidauthority.com, 109. www.androidauthority.com, 110. www.androidauthority.com, 111. www.marketscreener.com, 112. www.huaweicentral.com, 113. www.huaweicentral.com, 114. www.huaweicentral.com, 115. www.techadvisor.com, 116. www.androidauthority.com, 117. www.androidauthority.com, 118. www.androidauthority.com, 119. www.techadvisor.com, 120. www.techadvisor.com, 121. www.techadvisor.com, 122. www.huaweicentral.com, 123. www.tice.news, 124. www.reuters.com, 125. economictimes.indiatimes.com, 126. economictimes.indiatimes.com, 127. economictimes.indiatimes.com, 128. www.marketscreener.com, 129. www.marketscreener.com, 130. www.marketscreener.com, 131. economictimes.indiatimes.com, 132. economictimes.indiatimes.com, 133. economictimes.indiatimes.com, 134. www.huaweicentral.com, 135. www.marketscreener.com, 136. www.reuters.com, 137. economictimes.indiatimes.com
