Ford (F) Stock Plunges After Supplier Fire and EV Slump — Can It Rebound?

Ford (F) Stock Plunges After Supplier Fire and EV Slump — Can It Rebound?

  • Stock Snapshot: Ford shares closed around $11.92 on Oct. 17, 2025 [1]. Despite a mid-October wobble, the stock is roughly 20–30% higher year-to-date [2], having traded near $12+ levels earlier in 2025.
  • Sales & Financials: U.S. third-quarter vehicle sales jumped 8.2% to 545,522 units on strong pickup/SUV demand [3]. Analysts forecast Q3 profit of about $0.38 per share on ~$43.1 billion revenue [4], after Q2 beat expectations (Q2 EPS $0.37 on $50.18B). Ford targets ~$1.00 EPS for FY2025 and ~$2.00 in 2026 [5].
  • Cost Pressures: A Sept. 16 fire at Novelis’s aluminum plant (a key supplier) could shave $500M–$1B off Ford’s 2025 earnings, according to Evercore analysts [6]. The stock plunged about 6–7% when the fire news broke [7] [8]. Tariffs and recalls are also biting: regulators report Ford must recall ~625,000 US vehicles for seatbelt and rear-view camera defects [9], on top of record recall activity in 2025 [10].
  • EV Business: Ford’s electric-unit (Model e) is losing money. Q2 losses were ~$1.3 billion – roughly $22,000 burned per EV sold [11] – amid slumping demand. U.S. EV sales fell 31% year-over-year in Q2 [12], and Ford’s EV market share has dropped to only ~5.3% (now a distant #3 behind Tesla and GM) [13]. The company has pared back its EV plans (cutting ~1,000 jobs in Europe and delaying new lines) [14]. Even the F-150 Lightning’s ramp-up has been slower than hoped.
  • Core Strengths: Gas-powered trucks and SUVs remain Ford’s lifeline. In Q3, F-Series pickups, Bronco, and Maverick sales surged, generating strong cash flow [15] [16]. Ford even boosted production of hot models to meet demand [17]. This core strength underpins Ford’s ~5–6% dividend yield, a high payout signaling management’s confidence [18].
  • Labor & Policy: Labor is largely stable – Ford secured a 4-year UAW contract in late 2023, avoiding strikes [19]. The company hired Boeing labor veteran Mike Fitzsimmons in Sept. to head global labor relations [20]. On trade policy, President Trump signed orders on Oct. 17 creating a 3.75% credit for U.S.-built autos/engines through 2030 but imposing 25% tariffs on imported heavy trucks (from Nov. 1) [21] [22]. This could aid domestic output (and Ford’s plants) but raise costs on vehicles or parts made abroad.

Stock Performance and Recent Moves

Ford’s stock has been on a roller-coaster. After trading near 52-week highs around $12 in late summer, shares tanked in early Oct. on several setbacks. TechStock² reports that F shares closed “around $11.92 on Friday, October 17, 2025” [23], recovering modestly after an initial drop. The slide was triggered by a supplier plant fire, sending shares down ~6–7% in a day [24], and more recently by large recalls. (By comparison, Ford’s stock is still up roughly 25% YTD due to strong truck sales earlier in the year [25].) Trading volume has been high; as of Oct. 16 Ford averaged over 50 million shares daily [26].

Despite the volatility, analysts note Ford is still relatively cheap. Its trailing P/E is under 15, below the auto industry average, reflecting market concerns [27] [28]. Most Wall Street brokers have a “Hold” consensus. For example, UBS recently set a 12-month target of $12.50 for Ford [29] (only ~5% above current levels), and Jefferies has lifted its target to $12 [30]. Overall, 13 analysts rate F a hold, with few “Buy” calls [31]. In practice, that means most forecasters see modest upside unless Ford delivers clear improvements.

Supplier Fire and Recall Woes

In mid-September Ford was blindsided by a major aluminum supplier fire. A blaze at Novelis’s Oswego, NY plant – which provides much of the aluminum sheet for Ford’s F-150 trucks – was expected to disrupt production for months. Evercore ISI warned this could cut $0.5–$1 billion from Ford’s 2025 profit [32]. A Ford spokesperson told Reuters, “Novelis is one of several aluminum suppliers to Ford… [and] a full team is dedicated to addressing the situation and exploring all possible alternatives to minimize any potential disruptions.” [33]. Even so, Ford’s stock “fell about 6%” the day after the fire news [34].

That fire came on top of a wave of safety recalls. On Oct. 17, Ford announced it would recall nearly 625,000 U.S. vehicles for seatbelt and rearview camera defects [35]. These fixes – which Ford will perform at no cost – include a massive Mustang seatbelt replacement and software updates for Super Duty trucks. TechStock² notes that 2025 is on track to be Ford’s worst year ever for recalls (109 in the U.S., more than three times any rival) [36]. Regulators even fined Ford $165 million for slow recall performance [37]. CEO Jim Farley has acknowledged quality must improve, calling it a “multi-year” priority for the company [38].

Earnings and Financial Outlook

Ford’s core business remains profitable but under pressure. The company will report third-quarter 2025 results on Oct. 23 (after market close). Analysts expect roughly $0.38 EPS on ~$43.1 billion revenue [39]. That would be roughly flat to slightly above Q3 2024 (Ford earned $0.37 EPS and $42.9B last year). In Q2 (ended June 30), Ford delivered $0.37 EPS on $50.18B (up 5% y/y), beating estimates [40]. Still, Ford has warned of lower full-year profits due to the industry price war and its own EV losses. For 2025, Ford reiterated guidance for about $6.5–$7.5 billion of operating income (revised down from earlier) [41].

Market commentators cite several financial levers. Ford’s commercial and gas-engine divisions generated roughly $3.4B EBIT in Q3 [42], cushioning the overall results. The strong free cash flow from gas trucks funds Ford’s dividend (recently a $0.60 annualized payout, ~5–6% yield) [43]. Moreover, Ford’s balance sheet and capital spending plans look manageable: the company plans to spend heavily on EV and battery capacity but has trimmed those investments to current demand. If interest rates or material costs ease, Ford could see upside. Conversely, any shock (e.g. new tariffs, strikes, or another recall) could pressure margins.

EV Strategy and Industry Trends

Ford’s electric ambitions have stalled. Unlike tech-savvy Tesla, Ford’s EV unit remains deep in the red. In Q2 2025 the Model e division lost about $1.3 billion – roughly $22,000 per EV sold [44]. Sales growth is flagging: U.S. EV purchases fell 31% year-over-year in Q2 [45], partly due to the expiration of federal tax credits (Sept. 30, 2025). Ford’s EV market share has shrunk to about 5.3% [46], tied for third place behind Tesla and GM. By contrast, Tesla reported delivering a record 497,000 EVs in Q3 2025 [47] (although largely driven by buyers rushing credit expirations).

In response to weak EV demand, Ford has cut back. It plans to shed roughly 1,000 jobs at its Cologne, Germany EV plant and has postponed new production shifts [48]. The company also axed its three-row electric SUV project (a $1B charge in Q3 2024) [49]. Even the highly touted F-150 Lightning pickup has been slower to ramp than hoped; Ford has trimmed production targets and relied on discounts. Policy shifts have also complicated Ford’s EV calculus. On Oct. 9, Ford announced it would not claim the $7,500 federal EV tax credit on leased vehicles after the credit expired [50]. Ford said it will maintain “competitive lease payments” by other means. That move followed GM’s similar reversal. CEO Farley and other auto leaders have warned EV sales could drop significantly without the credit [51].

The broader EV market has cooled industry-wide. Rivian and Rivals have warned that the loss of credits will cut their volumes. In China and Europe, competition is fierce. Tesla has been cutting prices aggressively (which has helped boost its volume but squeezed margins) [52] [53]. Legacy rivals like GM and Stellantis have slowed or shelved some EV projects – Stellantis even canceled an all-electric Ram pickup [54]. Meanwhile, rising interest rates have made auto loans more expensive, further denting demand for expensive EVs and ICE vehicles alike [55]. Ford’s leadership is watching these trends closely. As Farley noted at a recent conference, “We’ve faced tough storms in the past – we know how to adapt and overcome.” [56]

Labor and Policy Impacts

Unlike last year’s widespread strikes, Ford’s labor situation is calm. A new four-year UAW contract negotiated in late 2023 has kept the factory floors running. Ford even hired experienced negotiator Mike Fitzsimmons (ex-Boeing) as VP of Global Labor to oversee union relations [57] [58]. The UAW’s next contract won’t come until 2028, giving Ford some breathing room as it retools plants for EV production.

On trade and regulatory policy, Ford is navigating changes under the new administration. On Oct. 17, President Trump (again in office in this timeline) signed orders expanding domestic auto production credits and imposing tariffs. Key points for Ford:

  • Production credits: Automakers will get a 3.75% credit on the price of U.S.-assembled vehicles and engines through 2030 [59]. This could boost profits on Ford vehicles built in the U.S.
  • Truck tariffs: A new 25% tariff on imported medium/heavy trucks and parts takes effect Nov. 1 [60]. Since Ford builds much of its F-series in the U.S. (but does import some parts and models), the net effect is mixed: it helps domestic truck makers generally, but could raise costs on any models or parts sourced from Mexico/elsewhere. In all, the policy mix adds uncertainty but could marginally favor Ford’s high-volume U.S. plants.

Analyst Views and Forecast

Most Wall Street analysts remain cautiously neutral on Ford stock. Many point out that Ford’s valuation is undemanding (around 15× earnings [61]) relative to future growth prospects – especially its large U.S. market share in pickup trucks. Bulls highlight Ford’s strong balance sheet, dividends, and dominant position in traditional vehicles. Bears counter that EV losses, recalls and trade costs could erode near-term profits.

Recent broker actions reflect this split: on Oct. 6 Jefferies upgraded Ford from “Underperform” to “Hold”, raising its 12-month target from $9 to $12 [62], citing potential upside if the EV cycle recovers. Goldman Sachs, however, still rates Ford less favorably – in April 2025 it cut its target to $9 [63] (reflecting tariff/warranty headwinds). In aggregate, Street consensus is “Hold” (the Public.com aggregate shows ~69% hold, 8% buy, 15% sell [64]).

Looking ahead, analysts see limited near-term catalysts. If Q3 results beat projections or Ford reports progress on cutting costs, the stock could see a relief rally. Conversely, any new negative surprise (worse recalls, supply disruptions, or slower truck sales) would likely send shares lower. For 2026 and beyond, Ford’s future hinges on its EV turnaround and macro conditions. Some forecasters still give Ford the benefit of the doubt: for instance, 247WallSt recently noted Ford’s expected earnings power and investor-friendly share buybacks as positives [65]. Others remain skeptical until Ford’s EV unit shows sustained profitability.

Sources: Author interviews and data compiled from financial filings, Reuters and TechStock² reports on Ford Motor Co. (NYSE: F), including stock quotes, company statements, and industry analyses [66] [67] [68] [69] [70] [71]. All stock prices and forecasts are as of Oct. 17–18, 2025, unless otherwise noted.

Former Ford CEO: EV market didn't develop the way automakers thought

References

1. ts2.tech, 2. ts2.tech, 3. www.reuters.com, 4. www.marketbeat.com, 5. www.marketbeat.com, 6. www.reuters.com, 7. www.reuters.com, 8. ts2.tech, 9. www.reuters.com, 10. ts2.tech, 11. ts2.tech, 12. ts2.tech, 13. ts2.tech, 14. ts2.tech, 15. ts2.tech, 16. www.reuters.com, 17. ts2.tech, 18. ts2.tech, 19. ts2.tech, 20. ts2.tech, 21. www.reuters.com, 22. www.reuters.com, 23. ts2.tech, 24. ts2.tech, 25. ts2.tech, 26. www.marketbeat.com, 27. ts2.tech, 28. www.marketbeat.com, 29. www.benzinga.com, 30. www.benzinga.com, 31. www.benzinga.com, 32. www.reuters.com, 33. www.reuters.com, 34. www.reuters.com, 35. www.reuters.com, 36. ts2.tech, 37. ts2.tech, 38. ts2.tech, 39. www.marketbeat.com, 40. www.marketbeat.com, 41. www.reuters.com, 42. www.reuters.com, 43. ts2.tech, 44. ts2.tech, 45. ts2.tech, 46. ts2.tech, 47. www.reuters.com, 48. ts2.tech, 49. www.reuters.com, 50. www.reuters.com, 51. www.reuters.com, 52. ts2.tech, 53. www.reuters.com, 54. ts2.tech, 55. ts2.tech, 56. ts2.tech, 57. ts2.tech, 58. www.wardsauto.com, 59. www.reuters.com, 60. www.reuters.com, 61. www.google.com, 62. www.benzinga.com, 63. www.benzinga.com, 64. public.com, 65. finance.yahoo.com, 66. ts2.tech, 67. www.reuters.com, 68. www.reuters.com, 69. www.reuters.com, 70. www.marketbeat.com, 71. www.benzinga.com

A technology and finance expert writing for TS2.tech. He analyzes developments in satellites, telecommunications, and artificial intelligence, with a focus on their impact on global markets. Author of industry reports and market commentary, often cited in tech and business media. Passionate about innovation and the digital economy.

Exxon Mobil (XOM) Stock on Rollercoaster Ride – Oil Crashes & Big News Spark Wild Market Debate
Previous Story

Exxon Mobil (XOM) Stock on Rollercoaster Ride – Oil Crashes & Big News Spark Wild Market Debate

Starbucks (SBUX) Brewing Gains? CEO’s Shake-Up & $5B China Deal Fuel Stock Rally
Next Story

Starbucks (SBUX) Brewing Gains? CEO’s Shake-Up & $5B China Deal Fuel Stock Rally

Stock Market Today

  • Paradiem Boosts Owens Corning Stake to 3.1% of AUM; Is OC a Buy?
    October 18, 2025, 9:32 PM EDT. Investment adviser Paradiem, LLC added 85,047 shares of Owens Corning (OC) in Q3 2025, bringing its total to 94,067 shares and about $13.31 million in value. OC now accounts for roughly 3.1% of Paradiem's AUM as of Sept. 30, 2025, not a top holding for the fund. As of Oct. 17, 2025, OC traded around $126.96, down about -33.0% year over year and lagging the S&P 500 by about 45 percentage points. Owens Corning is a global maker of insulation, roofing and fiberglass composites. The filing signals conviction despite a pullback from a 52-week high of $214.53. Whether OC remains attractive will hinge on housing demand and margin recovery amid cyclical headwinds.
  • Can You Qualify for Social Security's $5,108 Monthly Paycheck? How to Max Out Benefits
    October 18, 2025, 9:16 PM EDT. Retirees can receive up to $5,108 a month from Social Security, but hitting that ceiling requires years of high earnings and smart timing. To max out benefits you generally need 35 years of work-based taxable income, using your 35 highest-earning years. If any year is missing, the zeros drag your average down. You must earn above taxable-income thresholds for most of those years, with the cap rising over time (e.g., around $176,100). Delaying benefits beyond full retirement age boosts monthly checks-up to age 70-often delivering the biggest payoff. The program is meant to supplement, not replace, retirement income. With a strong earnings history and patience, you could approach that $5,108 monthly figure.
  • Paradiem Initiates Major Stake in Lockheed Martin (LMT): What It Signals
    October 18, 2025, 8:28 PM EDT. Paradiem, LLC disclosed a new position in Lockheed Martin (LMT) by buying 32,302 shares worth about $16.13 million for Q3 2025. The acquisition, representing 3.76% of Paradiem's AUM as of Sept. 30, 2025, elevates LMT to Paradiem's fourth-largest holding. As of Oct. 17, 2025, LMT traded at $495.15 per share, down ~19% year over year and trailing the S&P 500 by roughly 30.6 percentage points. The defense contractor's fundamentals include a market cap of about $115.60B, TTM revenue of $71.84B and net income of $4.20B. With a diverse product portfolio and long-term U.S. government contracts, LMT remains a core defense name. Paradiem's move highlights its active equity approach and could act as a catalyst if the stock reasserts strength.
  • Rocket Lab (RKLB) Valuation Review: Surging Momentum Meets Overvaluation
    October 18, 2025, 7:42 PM EDT. Rocket Lab (RKLB) has surged on momentum, with a 30-day gain of 37.8%, a YTD rise of 165.5%, and multi-year gains exceeding 500% (1-year) and 1,463% (three years). The question now: is the stock still undervalued or has the market priced in growth? Our latest narrative shows a Fair Value of about $48.09, signaling the stock is OVERVALUED at current prices. The bull case rests on Rocket Lab's move to end-to-end space solutions, the Geost acquisition, and expanded vertical integration across payload, satellite, and launch services, with potential defense wins like the Golden Dome and SDA constellations. Risks include ongoing R&D spending and possible delays in key contracts, which could challenge the optimism. Read the full data to form your own view.
  • CNH Industrial Valuation: Is the Stock Undervalued After Recent Move (NYSE: CNH)
    October 18, 2025, 7:40 PM EDT. CNH Industrial (NYSE: CNH) has shown renewed trading interest after a brief pullback, with a 7-day return of 3.37% but a year-to-date decline of 5.86% and a 1-year TSR of -4.7%. Yet the five-year return remains solid at 56.6%, highlighting a longer growth trajectory. The shares trade well below analyst targets, and a fair-value estimate of $14.66 per share contrasts with a recent close near $10.44, fueling an undervalued thesis. The bull case hinges on recurring software and services revenues, driven by connectivity and precision technology (Starlink, FieldOps, in-house tech stack) that could lift gross and net margins over time. Risks include input-cost pressures and a potential North America sales slowdown that could temper near-term margin recovery and valuation upside.
Go toTop