Meta description: Tesla (TSLA) is trading around $441 on December 3, 2025, as fresh data from Germany and China, Michael Burry’s latest bearish call and new robotics headlines sharpen the bull–bear debate around the stock.
Note: This article is for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice or a recommendation to buy or sell any security.
Tesla Stock Snapshot – Price, Valuation and 2025 Performance
As of late trading on December 3, 2025, Tesla, Inc. (NASDAQ: TSLA) is changing hands at roughly $441 per share, giving the company a market capitalization in the $1.4–$1.43 trillion range. [1]
That price leaves TSLA:
- Up around low‑teens percent year to date in 2025 (roughly +13% YTD as of December 2). [2]
- Still more than 10% below its all‑time high set in late 2024. [3]
On standard valuation metrics, Tesla is in a very different universe from traditional automakers:
- Roughly 294× trailing earnings and ~192× forward earnings, according to one recent breakdown. [4]
- A trailing P/E around 286 and P/E/G ratio near 16.8, with a market cap quoted at $1.43 trillion, in MarketBeat’s institutional snapshot. [5]
That nosebleed valuation is central to almost every TSLA debate today – and it is exactly what’s attracting both the most ardent bulls and some very vocal bears.
Germany Weakens, China Stabilises: Mixed Demand Signals
German registrations tumble, BYD overtakes in November
Fresh data from Germany on December 3 underline how challenging the European market has become for Tesla. The country’s road traffic agency (KBA) reported that:
- Tesla registrations in Germany fell 20.2% year-on-year in November to 1,763 units.
- For January–November 2025, Tesla’s German sales dropped 48.4% to 17,358 vehicles versus the prior year.
- China’s BYD surpassed Tesla in new registrations during November in Germany. [6]
This comes on top of a broader European slide. Late November data showed EU, UK and EFTA registrations down 49% in October to 6,964 units, while BYD’s registrations surged 207% to 17,470, signalling that Tesla is ceding meaningful share to both Chinese challengers and legacy OEMs. [7]
China: November shipments rise 10%, but lag the market
The picture in China is more nuanced. New numbers released today show that:
- November 2025 shipments from Tesla’s Shanghai Gigafactory rose 10% year-on-year to about 86,700 vehicles, marking the company’s second‑best month of the year and its third consecutive monthly increase. [8]
- The Shanghai factory now accounts for nearly 40% of Tesla’s global output and can produce up to 950,000 cars annually. [9]
However, the headline growth hides several pressure points:
- From January to November, wholesale shipments (domestic + exports) from Shanghai fell 8.3% versus the same period in 2024, to 754,561 units, with eight months showing year‑over‑year declines. [10]
- China’s overall new energy vehicle (NEV) market grew about 20% in November, double Tesla’s 10% shipment growth. That implies Tesla is still losing relative share, even as volumes rebound. [11]
- November’s strength partly reflected buyers rushing to lock in NEV tax incentives before they expire at year‑end, plus extended Model Y delivery times that pulled some demand forward. [12]
To defend share, Tesla has rolled out cheaper Model 3 and Model Y variants, some priced below $40,000 in China, boosting volume but stoking concern that pricing power and margins are being eroded in a brutal EV price war. [13]
Broader global demand headwinds
Beyond Germany and China, Tesla’s global sales story remains choppy:
- In Europe, one analysis noted that Tesla’s EU, UK and EFTA registrations have been sliding for months under intense competition from BYD and local brands. [14]
- China sales hit a three‑year low in October, reinforcing the idea that local rivals are swarming every price point. [15]
- In the U.S., Tesla’s EV market share has fallen to roughly 45% from about 80% in 2019, even though Chinese brands still face heavy tariffs and are not yet major players in the U.S. retail market. [16]
Earlier in the year, Reuters also reported that Tesla faced delivery declines, protests and brand backlash in parts of Europe tied in part to Elon Musk’s political positioning, while a broader global EV price war weighed on margins. [17]
The upshot: November’s China rebound offers some relief, but the global demand picture is far from smooth, especially in Europe.
Robotics, Optimus and U.S. Policy: The Long‑Term Story the Bulls Are Watching
U.S. “robotics‑first” policy chatter lifts TSLA
On December 3, tech outlet TECHi reported that Tesla stock rose about 1% after reports that the Trump administration is preparing a major policy push to accelerate the U.S. robotics industry, possibly including an executive order in 2026. [18]
Key points from that report:
- The U.S. Commerce Department has been meeting with major robotics players and signalled it is “all in” on robotics and advanced manufacturing. [19]
- A multi‑agency effort is reportedly in the works, including a Department of Transportation robotics working group, hinting at friendlier regulatory treatment for automation and autonomous systems. [20]
- The piece explicitly framed Tesla and its Optimus humanoid robot as potential major beneficiaries if U.S. policy supports large‑scale testing and deployment of robotics. [21]
For TSLA bulls, this reinforces a core narrative: Tesla isn’t just an automaker, it’s a robotics and AI platform that could sit at the centre of a policy‑supported automation boom.
Optimus can now run – and Musk talks about “jobs becoming optional”
On the same day, a widely shared Times of India article covered a new Tesla video showing the Optimus humanoid robot running across a lab floor, an upgrade from earlier demos focused on careful walking or object handling. [22]
The story highlighted:
- Improvements in balance, coordination and gait control, which Tesla described as a “new performance record.” [23]
- Tesla AI head Ashok Elluswamy’s three‑word reaction — “Run, Optimus, run!” — which helped the clip go viral. [24]
- Musk’s comments at a Washington forum that Optimus could “change the world economy,” make many traditional jobs optional within 10–20 years and even help eliminate poverty, with mass production targeted and an eventual price tag in the $20,000–$30,000 range once scaled. [25]
Musk has also floated the idea of “self‑replicating” factories where robots build other robots, pushing an extremely ambitious vision of Tesla as a core supplier of physical AI labour. [26]
Musk’s AI stock picks: Google and Nvidia
In a November 30 podcast with Indian entrepreneur Nikhil Kamath, reported today by CoinCentral, Musk surprised markets by naming Google (Alphabet) and Nvidia as his top AI investment picks – not Tesla. [27]
He argued that:
- Google has “laid the groundwork for an immense amount of value creation from an AI standpoint.” [28]
- Nvidia is “obvious” as an AI winner given its chip dominance. [29]
- Over time, “companies that do AI and robotics, and maybe spaceflight, are going to be overwhelmingly almost all of the value.” [30]
For Tesla shareholders, the takeaway is indirect but clear: Musk still sees AI + robotics as where most long‑term economic value will reside – and Tesla is his own pure‑play vehicle on that thesis, even if he isn’t explicitly pitching TSLA in that interview.
Michael Burry vs. the Tesla Faithful: Bear Calls and Pay‑Plan Controversy
“Ridiculously overvalued” and “wildly overvalued”
On December 3, 24/7 Wall St. reported that famed “Big Short” investor Michael Burry has renewed his attack on Tesla’s valuation, calling the stock “ridiculously overvalued” and its pay structure for Musk deeply problematic. [31]
Key points from the latest coverage:
- Tesla trades around 294× trailing earnings and 192× forward earnings, with net income down 36.6% year‑over‑year to $1.37 billion despite 11.6% revenue growth over the same period. [32]
- Operating margin has shrunk to roughly 5.8%, reinforcing concerns that price cuts and incentives are eroding profitability. [33]
- Burry’s comments went viral on Reddit’s r/investing, where a top comment quipped that at such multiples, “you’re not buying a car company – you’re buying a religion.” [34]
Another article from the same outlet framed Burry as “building a bear army” around Tesla, noting that TSLA slipped about 1.2% to $424.98 on December 2 as his remarks spread. [35]
The $1 trillion pay package and $8.5 trillion market‑cap question
A companion piece published today argued that Burry’s criticism also zeroes in on Elon Musk’s approved $1 trillion compensation package, which depends on Tesla eventually achieving an $8.5 trillion market capitalization. [36]
The article’s author, however, cautioned that:
- Shorting Tesla has historically been dangerous because of the stock’s unpredictability and cult‑like investor base. [37]
- There may be “no reason to hit the panic button just yet,” even if Burry’s concerns about valuation and dilution deserve serious consideration. [38]
Taken together, the Burry coverage encapsulates Tesla’s current polarization: one camp sees an over‑levered bubble that has to deflate; the other sees a volatile but durable compounding story tied to AI, robotaxis and robotics.
Fundamentals: Q3 Results Show Revenue Growth, Profit Squeeze
Q3 2025 by the numbers
Tesla’s third‑quarter 2025 results, reported on October 22, provide the fundamental backdrop for today’s debate:
- Revenue: about $28.1 billion, up roughly 11–12% year‑over‑year. [39]
- Net income: around $1.37 billion, down about 37% year‑over‑year, reflecting heavy price cuts and rising costs. [40]
- Earnings per share (EPS): roughly $0.50, versus about $0.72 in the same quarter a year earlier. [41]
Different outlets have reported slightly different consensus numbers, with some describing the quarter as a revenue beat but with EPS roughly in line or a touch below certain estimates, underscoring how expectations were already muted heading into the print. [42]
On the operational side, Tesla’s own updates show that in Q3 2025 the company:
- Produced over 447,000 vehicles and delivered over 497,000, a marked rebound from Q2’s 410,000 produced and 384,000 delivered. [43]
- Deployed 12.5 GWh of energy storage, a record for Tesla’s battery business, versus 9.6 GWh in Q2. [44]
So while the top line and energy segment are still growing, automotive margins have clearly compressed, which is the crux of the valuation anxiety.
Street forecasts: slower 2025, re‑acceleration in 2026
Analyst‑aggregator StockAnalysis currently shows consensus expectations roughly as follows: [45]
- 2025 revenue: about $97.1 billion, a slight decline from ~$97.7 billion in 2024.
- 2026 revenue: expected to rebound to around $109.2 billion, implying double‑digit growth (~12% YoY).
- 2025 EPS: about $1.65, down from $2.04 in 2024.
- 2026 EPS: expected to rise to roughly $2.14, a nearly 30% jump from 2025.
A separate breakdown from StocksGuide shows a similar mid‑$1.60s EPS consensus for 2025 and projects strong multi‑year growth thereafter, with Tesla’s P/E ratio gradually falling from ~286 today to roughly the 80s by 2028 and under 40 by 2030 if those earnings materialise. [46]
The exact path differs by provider, but the broad pattern is consistent:
- 2025 looks like a transition year with flattish revenue and weaker EPS.
- From 2026 onward, Wall Street expects re‑acceleration, assuming new models, energy growth, FSD and robotics begin to contribute more meaningfully.
Analyst Ratings and Price Targets: From $19 to $600 – and One at $525
If you’re looking for consensus clarity on Tesla’s fair value, you won’t find it.
Average targets cluster below today’s price
According to MarketBeat, which summarises dozens of Wall Street reports: [47]
- The average 12‑month price target is about $398.92, below today’s ~$441 share price.
- The stock carries an overall rating of “Hold”, with a wide spread of buy, hold and sell recommendations.
StockAnalysis, which tracks a slightly different analyst set, shows an average target in the high‑$300s and a “Buy” or “Moderate Buy”–type consensus, reflecting a somewhat more constructive tilt among the analysts it covers. [48]
StocksGuide, aggregating forecasts from around 58 analysts, reports an average target in the low‑$400s and a mix of ratings that leans bullish but includes a substantial number of neutral and outright bearish calls, underscoring how divided the Street is. [49]
BNP Paribas sees ~27% downside
In a note published on December 2, BNP Paribas raised its Tesla target price from $307 to $313, but that still implies roughly 27% downside from a stock price near $430 at the time of the report. [50]
BNP reiterated the view that:
- While Tesla beat expectations on revenue and modestly on EPS in the latest quarter, [51]
- The stock’s valuation leaves little room for execution missteps, especially with profitability under pressure.
Outliers: from ultra‑bearish to ultra‑bullish
A widely shared 24/7 Wall St. analysis of Wall Street targets pointed out that: [52]
- The most bearish analyst has a target near $19.05 per share.
- The most bullish analyst sees the stock going to $600.
Separate reporting notes that:
- Melius Research analyst Rob Wertheimer has a $525 price target and believes Tesla could “crush” traditional automakers as its AI and robotics lead widens. [53]
- Other bullish firms such as Stifel, Canaccord and Mizuho have recently raised targets into the $450–$490 range, with ratings in the “Buy” or “Outperform” camp. [54]
Meanwhile, a long‑term 24/7 Wall St. forecast that models normalized EPS and revenue out to 2030 suggests: [55]
- A 2025 “fair value” around the mid‑$300s, implying near‑term downside from current levels.
- Potential upside to $460+ by 2026, and over $1,100 by 2030 in its bullish scenario, if Tesla hits aggressive earnings and revenue milestones.
The spread from $19 to $600 neatly summarises why Tesla is still one of the most controversial names in global markets.
Technical and Quant Models: Near‑Term Bullish, Fearful Sentiment
Algorithmic and technical models are, for now, leaning bullish on TSLA.
Crypto‑adjacent analytics site CoinCodex, which runs a technical model on the stock, reports that as of the afternoon of December 3: [56]
- 26 technical indicators flash bullish and 0 bearish, giving Tesla a 100% “bullish” technical score.
- Over the past 12 months, Tesla’s value has increased about 23.6%, with 15 green days out of the last 30.
- Short‑term forecasts see TSLA potentially reaching around $457 by December 7, roughly 3.5% above current prices.
- For December 2025, the model envisions a trading range between roughly $396 and $479 with an average expectation near $440, implying an 8% annualized return versus current levels.
Interestingly, even with the bullish technical readings, the site’s Fear & Greed Index sits in “Fear” territory, suggesting that price action and on‑chain sentiment (where applicable) are not fully aligned. [57]
As always, these quantitative forecasts are based on past price behaviour and indicators, not fundamental analysis, and can change quickly.
Institutional Flows and Insider Selling
Today also brought new data on who is actually buying and selling Tesla shares:
- Invesco Ltd. increased its TSLA stake by 6.2% in the second quarter, to 15.71 million shares worth about $5.0 billion, making Tesla its 9th‑largest holding and accounting for 0.8% of Invesco’s overall portfolio. That stake represents roughly 0.49% of Tesla’s outstanding shares. [58]
- Institutional investors and hedge funds collectively own about 66.2% of Tesla, while insiders own around 19.9%. [59]
On the other side of the ledger, insider filings show:
- Director James R. Murdoch sold 60,000 shares in mid‑September at an average price of about $422.68, a sale worth over $25 million. [60]
- CFO Vaibhav Taneja sold 2,606 shares at roughly $352.38, for just over $900,000. [61]
- Over the last 90 days, insiders in total sold about 82,606 shares worth around $33.6 million. [62]
That combination — heavy institutional ownership, some high‑profile insider selling and still‑large insider stakes — will likely continue to be dissected by investors trying to gauge alignment and confidence.
How All of This Shapes the Tesla Stock Story Right Now
Putting today’s news and the latest analyses together, the December 3, 2025 Tesla story looks like this:
- Valuation remains extreme. Even after a volatile year, TSLA trades at well over 200× earnings by most measures, leaving little margin for error if growth stumbles. [63]
- Core EV demand is under pressure in key markets.
- Profitability is squeezed. Revenue is growing in the low double‑digits while net income and EPS are declining, as price cuts and incentives weigh on margins. [66]
- The long‑term bull case is increasingly tied to AI, robotaxis and robotics.
- U.S. policy rumblings point to a robotics‑friendly environment. [67]
- Optimus continues to make visible progress, now able to run, with Musk pitching a world where humanoid robots make many jobs optional. [68]
- Musk’s public comments emphasise that AI and robotics will dominate future economic value, even as he highlights Google and Nvidia as top AI bets. [69]
- Opinions are split from Main Street to Wall Street.
- Models and quants say “up,” sentiment says “nervous.”
- Technical models are short‑term bullish, yet fear gauges remain cautious. [72]
What This Means for Investors
For existing or prospective Tesla shareholders, today’s data and commentary reinforce a few practical points:
- Volatility is likely to remain high. With such a wide gap between bullish and bearish narratives — and a valuation that amplifies any surprise — sharp moves in either direction shouldn’t be unexpected.
- Fundamentals and narrative have to be tracked together. Tesla’s share price is clearly influenced by Optimus demos, robotaxis, AI buzz and policy rumours, not just quarterly EV deliveries.
- Scenario analysis matters more than point estimates. With price targets ranging from $19 to $600 and long‑term models projecting everything from modest downside to multi‑bagger upside by 2030, investors may find it more useful to map out their own bull, base and bear cases than to rely on any single forecast. [73]
Anyone considering TSLA should carefully weigh:
- Their time horizon (short‑term trading vs. decade‑long holding).
- Their risk tolerance for large swings and potential drawdowns.
- How much of their portfolio they’re comfortable allocating to a high‑beta, high‑valuation, story‑driven stock.
And, of course, consult a qualified financial adviser for personalised guidance.
References
1. 247wallst.com, 2. 247wallst.com, 3. 247wallst.com, 4. 247wallst.com, 5. www.marketbeat.com, 6. www.reuters.com, 7. 247wallst.com, 8. coincentral.com, 9. coincentral.com, 10. coincentral.com, 11. coincentral.com, 12. coincentral.com, 13. coincentral.com, 14. 247wallst.com, 15. 247wallst.com, 16. 247wallst.com, 17. www.reuters.com, 18. www.techi.com, 19. www.techi.com, 20. www.techi.com, 21. www.techi.com, 22. timesofindia.indiatimes.com, 23. timesofindia.indiatimes.com, 24. timesofindia.indiatimes.com, 25. timesofindia.indiatimes.com, 26. timesofindia.indiatimes.com, 27. coincentral.com, 28. coincentral.com, 29. coincentral.com, 30. coincentral.com, 31. 247wallst.com, 32. 247wallst.com, 33. 247wallst.com, 34. 247wallst.com, 35. 247wallst.com, 36. 247wallst.com, 37. 247wallst.com, 38. 247wallst.com, 39. www.marketbeat.com, 40. 247wallst.com, 41. 247wallst.com, 42. www.marketbeat.com, 43. ir.tesla.com, 44. ir.tesla.com, 45. stockanalysis.com, 46. stocksguide.com, 47. www.marketbeat.com, 48. stockanalysis.com, 49. stocksguide.com, 50. www.marketbeat.com, 51. www.marketbeat.com, 52. 247wallst.com, 53. finance.yahoo.com, 54. 247wallst.com, 55. 247wallst.com, 56. coincodex.com, 57. coincodex.com, 58. www.marketbeat.com, 59. www.marketbeat.com, 60. www.marketbeat.com, 61. www.marketbeat.com, 62. www.marketbeat.com, 63. 247wallst.com, 64. www.reuters.com, 65. coincentral.com, 66. 247wallst.com, 67. www.techi.com, 68. timesofindia.indiatimes.com, 69. coincentral.com, 70. 247wallst.com, 71. finance.yahoo.com, 72. coincodex.com, 73. 247wallst.com
