As of 6:00 p.m. ET on Wednesday, December 17, 2025, Big Tech stocks finished the U.S. session broadly lower, with the AI trade back in the crosshairs. The headline driver wasn’t a single earnings miss from a mega-cap—rather, it was a growing market debate over how the next wave of AI infrastructure gets financed, and whether the returns will justify the scale of spending now embedded in forecasts. [1]
Stock market close: Tech leads the retreat
U.S. stocks ended sharply lower, led by technology and AI-linked names. By the closing bell:
- The Nasdaq Composite fell about 1.8%, extending a recent slide as “AI bubble” concerns resurfaced. [2]
- The S&P 500 dropped about 1.2% and the Dow Jones Industrial Average lost about 0.5%. [3]
A key catalyst was renewed selling in AI infrastructure and chip-related stocks after new questions emerged around data-center deal terms, leverage, and payback periods—a theme that has started to dominate day-to-day price action in the sector. [4]
Magnificent Seven scoreboard: Where Big Tech closed today
Here’s where the “Magnificent Seven” finished the regular session (prices shown near the post-close time referenced in the market data):
- Apple (AAPL): $271.84, down ~1.0%
- Microsoft (MSFT): $476.12, down ~0.0% (essentially flat)
- Alphabet (GOOGL): $296.72, down ~3.2% [5]
- Amazon (AMZN): $221.27, down ~0.5% [6]
- Meta Platforms (META): $649.50, down ~1.2% [7]
- Nvidia (NVDA): $170.94, down ~3.7% [8]
- Tesla (TSLA): $467.26, down ~4.6% [9]
Notably, the pressure wasn’t limited to the Mag 7. Broadcom (AVGO)—often treated as a Big Tech proxy because of its AI networking and custom silicon exposure—also fell sharply (~4.5%) amid continued post-earnings volatility. [10]
What moved Big Tech stocks today
1) The AI “financing question” returns—via Oracle and the data-center trade
The market’s latest AI anxiety point centered on Oracle and an AI data-center project in Michigan tied to OpenAI’s infrastructure push. Reports around stalled funding talks helped reignite concern that the AI buildout is becoming increasingly dependent on complex structures—leases, debt, and equity partners—where terms matter as much as demand. [11]
Oracle said discussions for an equity deal supporting the Michigan project remained on track without a previously discussed partner, while a source described disagreements over terms compared with other projects. The episode mattered to Big Tech investors because it reinforced a growing theme: even if AI demand is real, markets still have to price the cost of capital and the durability of cash flows. [12]
2) Nvidia’s selloff: not just valuation—competition narratives are sharpening
Nvidia dropped nearly 4% as the broader AI complex sold off, but today’s tape also reflected an additional pressure point: the market’s increasing focus on Nvidia’s software moat—and what happens if hyperscalers make meaningful progress building alternatives. [13]
A Reuters report detailed a Google initiative aimed at making its AI chips (TPUs) more developer-friendly for PyTorch, the dominant AI framework, in an effort to reduce dependence on Nvidia’s CUDA ecosystem. The initiative—internally called “TorchTPU,” according to the report—was described as part of Google’s push to broaden TPU adoption, including collaboration with Meta (a major PyTorch backer). [14]
For investors, this is the near-term tension: Nvidia remains central to AI compute, but Big Tech customers are increasingly incentivized to diversify supply, improve bargaining power, and control costs—especially when AI inference becomes a larger share of workloads. [15]
3) Alphabet: AI infrastructure plus YouTube catalysts—yet the stock sank
Alphabet fell more than 3% on a day when investors were already leaning risk-off in AI-linked names. The same Reuters reporting around Google’s TPU/PyTorch push—framed as an effort to reduce reliance on Nvidia—was cited as a factor in Alphabet’s decline. [16]
Alphabet also had a separate media catalyst in the background: Reuters noted that YouTube is set to stream the Oscars starting in 2029—a potentially meaningful long-dated content and advertising lever for YouTube’s ecosystem. Even so, that positive headline wasn’t enough to offset the day’s broader AI and tech de-risking. [17]
4) Amazon: OpenAI talks and an internal AI reshuffle land on the same day
Amazon’s stock dipped modestly, but the company sat at the center of one of the day’s most closely watched AI headlines: talks to invest about $10 billion in OpenAI, in a potential deal valuing OpenAI at more than $500 billion, according to a source cited by Reuters. [18]
The strategic logic is clear: access to models, enterprise distribution, and compute demand. But today’s market action underscored a second-order investor concern—the capital intensity of the AI ecosystem, and whether funding becomes “circular” across the same cluster of Big Tech balance sheets. (One strategist quoted by Reuters described investor unease around “the circular nature of spending around OpenAI.”) [19]
Amazon also announced an internal leadership reshuffle in its AI organization. Reuters reported that AWS veteran Peter DeSantis is set to lead a broader group spanning AI models, custom silicon and quantum initiatives, while Rohit Prasadis expected to step down at year-end. CEO Andy Jassy framed it as an inflection point for customer experiences and advanced technologies. [20]
5) Tesla: regulatory risk back in focus after California DMV action
Tesla was the biggest decliner among the Mag 7. Shares dropped about 4.6% after news tied to a long-running California case over Autopilot and Full Self-Driving marketing. Reuters reported that California’s DMV adopted a judge’s proposal for a 30-day suspension of Tesla’s manufacturing and sales licenses—but immediately put the suspension on hold, including a 90-day stay for the sales license while giving Tesla time to remedy alleged misleading statements. [21]
The market takeaway: as Tesla leans harder into robotaxis and autonomy narratives, regulatory language and consumer-protection disputes can quickly become stock-moving catalysts, even when the most severe actions are delayed or stayed. [22]
6) Apple: a down day, but bullish 2026 AI forecasts keep building
Apple slid about 1%, but the most notable Apple-specific storyline today was on the forecast side. Investor’s Business Daily reported that Morgan Stanley raised its Apple price target to $315 from $305 and reiterated an overweight stance, outlining a thesis that Apple could move from an AI laggard to a stronger AI “leader” in 2026—driven in part by expectations around a Siri upgrade and broader Apple Intelligence adoption. [23]
The same report pointed to a potentially underappreciated driver of iPhone upgrades: a large installed base of iPhones that may not support Apple’s newest AI features by late 2026, which could accelerate replacement cycles. [24]
7) Microsoft and Meta: relatively steadier, but still tied to the AI re-pricing
Microsoft ended essentially flat, while Meta slipped about 1%. Even without a single dominant Microsoft headline at the close, Microsoft remains structurally intertwined with the OpenAI ecosystem and the broader enterprise AI buildout that investors were repricing today. [25]
Meta, meanwhile, was directly referenced in the Reuters report on Google’s TPU initiative because of Meta’s deep connection to PyTorch. That’s a reminder that the next phase of AI competition may be shaped not only by hardware (chips), but by software tooling, frameworks, and developer friction—areas where Big Tech incumbents can exert influence. [26]
Wall Street analysis: Why today’s pullback felt different
Across market coverage today, one theme kept surfacing: the shift from “AI demand” to “AI durability.”
Investors are no longer debating whether AI is important—they’re debating who gets paid, when, and with what balance-sheet risk. Reuters highlighted that markets are on guard for signals that AI demand is tailing off or that massive spending won’t pay off as anticipated, a concern amplified by the size of infrastructure ambitions now being discussed across the ecosystem. [27]
Separately, a Reuters commentary on investor positioning noted that “long Magnificent Seven” remains the most crowded trade in Bank of America’s fund manager survey—an important backdrop on days when momentum unwinds quickly. [28]
And despite the selloff, bullish longer-range forecasts did not disappear. Barron’s highlighted that J.P. Morgan still viewed Broadcom as a top chip pick for 2026, maintaining an overweight stance and a $475 price target—illustrating how sharply sentiment can diverge between short-term de-risking and long-term AI infrastructure conviction. [29]
What to watch next after today’s Big Tech selloff
Key macro catalyst: U.S. inflation data
Reuters noted investors were looking ahead to consumer inflation data from the Commerce Department—a report that could influence the path of rate cuts and, by extension, the discount rate applied to long-duration growth stocks like Big Tech. [30]
A counter-signal on AI demand: Micron’s after-hours surge
After the bell, Micron delivered the kind of demand signal that can stabilize AI narratives: Reuters reported Micron forecast adjusted profit far above expectations, with management pointing to tight memory markets and AI data-center demand; shares rose sharply in extended trading. While Micron isn’t “Big Tech,” the read-through matters because memory (including high-bandwidth memory) is a key bottleneck component in AI systems purchased by hyperscalers and Big Tech platforms. [31]
The bottom line for Big Tech investors tonight
Big Tech stocks ended December 17 with a clear message from the market: AI leadership isn’t being questioned—AI economics are. Today’s declines were driven less by product news and more by financing mechanics, competitive positioning in AI software ecosystems, and heightened sensitivity to anything that hints at slower payback for data-center spending. [32]
If Thursday’s inflation data cools rate worries and AI demand signals remain strong, Big Tech could stabilize quickly. But if financing headlines keep deteriorating—especially around large AI infrastructure builds—investors may continue to reduce exposure to the most crowded mega-cap trades, even when the long-term AI narrative remains intact. [33]
References
1. www.reuters.com, 2. www.reuters.com, 3. www.reuters.com, 4. www.reuters.com, 5. www.reuters.com, 6. www.reuters.com, 7. www.reuters.com, 8. www.reuters.com, 9. www.reuters.com, 10. www.investopedia.com, 11. www.reuters.com, 12. www.reuters.com, 13. www.reuters.com, 14. www.reuters.com, 15. www.reuters.com, 16. www.reuters.com, 17. www.reuters.com, 18. www.reuters.com, 19. www.reuters.com, 20. www.reuters.com, 21. www.reuters.com, 22. www.reuters.com, 23. www.investors.com, 24. www.investors.com, 25. www.reuters.com, 26. www.reuters.com, 27. www.reuters.com, 28. www.reuters.com, 29. www.barrons.com, 30. www.reuters.com, 31. www.reuters.com, 32. www.reuters.com, 33. www.reuters.com
