December 24, 2025 — Strategy Inc (Nasdaq: MSTR) is spending Christmas Eve with investors debating a simple but loaded question: is the company’s latest move a prudent de-risking… or a sign that the “leveraged Bitcoin proxy” era is maturing into something more complicated?
Shares have been volatile this week, trading around the high-$150s as the market digests fresh disclosures showing no new Bitcoin purchases during the latest reporting window and a sharply higher U.S. dollar cash reserve built from equity sales. [1]
At the same time, Executive Chairman Michael Saylor is trying to reframe the entire investment story—positioning Strategy not merely as a way to “own Bitcoin through a stock,” but as a broader capital markets platform issuing multiple securities designed to appeal to different investor appetites. [2]
What is moving Strategy Inc stock on December 24, 2025
The immediate catalyst is the company’s Form 8‑K dated December 22, 2025, which spells out three headline items investors tend to react to in big, emotional capital letters:
- Equity sold through the ATM program: Strategy reported selling 4,535,000 shares of MSTR during December 15–21, generating $747.8 million in net proceeds. [3]
- Bitcoin purchases paused: The filing shows no Bitcoin was acquired that week, leaving holdings unchanged. [4]
- USD Reserve increased: Strategy’s USD Reserve balance reached $2.19 billion as of December 21, up from the initial $1.44 billion level announced earlier this month. [5]
That’s the mechanical explanation for the market’s push-pull reaction: raising cash improves near-term liquidity optics, but pausing Bitcoin buys reduces the “always-on Bitcoin accumulation” narrative that many MSTR traders are conditioned to expect.
The cash-reserve pivot: why build $2.19 billion instead of buying more Bitcoin
Strategy created the USD Reserve to support preferred-stock dividends and interest on outstanding debt—dollar-denominated obligations that don’t care about Bitcoin’s mood swings. [6]
From a risk perspective, the logic is straightforward:
- A bigger cash buffer can reduce investor anxiety about a forced “sell Bitcoin to pay bills” scenario during a crypto drawdown.
- It can also make Strategy’s preferred securities more palatable to institutions that want rules, buffers, and predictable payment coverage.
But the tradeoff is also real: when Strategy uses equity proceeds to build cash rather than to buy BTC immediately, the stock can look less like a pure high-beta Bitcoin turbocharger in the near term—especially to short-horizon traders.
Investing.com’s analysis on December 24 framed the move as risk-softening but also noted it changes the “upside math” for investors who primarily own MSTR for maximum Bitcoin torque. [7]
Strategy’s Bitcoin holdings: the numbers investors are anchoring on
As of December 21, 2025, Strategy reported:
- 671,268 BTC held
- $50.33 billion aggregate purchase price
- $74,972 average purchase price per Bitcoin (inclusive of fees/expenses) [8]
The company’s own dashboard shows the same headline BTC count and average cost, and notes its market data timestamps were last updated on December 23, 2025. [9]
Those figures matter because the stock’s valuation debate often reduces to two competing lenses:
- Balance-sheet lens: What are the BTC holdings worth versus Strategy’s market cap?
- Capital-markets lens: How effectively can Strategy issue equity/preferred/debt and convert that funding engine into long-run BTC-per-share growth without over-diluting common shareholders?
In 2025, that second lens has become more central—especially as competition from spot Bitcoin ETFs gives investors simpler ways to track BTC price movement without corporate-structure complexity. [10]
Michael Saylor’s new pitch: “beyond Bitcoin exposure”
On December 24, Investopedia reported that Saylor is explicitly trying to evolve the narrative. His message: Strategy is building something “beyond Bitcoin exposure,” describing it as a capital markets platform rather than merely a Bitcoin proxy. [11]
This isn’t just branding poetry. Strategy has spent 2025 expanding the menu of instruments it offers—particularly preferred securities designed to appeal to income-focused buyers. Investopedia highlighted Strategy’s variable-rate perpetual preferred shares (STRC) as part of this repositioning, noting that STRC raised roughly $2.5 billion during 2025 and that Strategy has built dollar reserves alongside its Bitcoin reserve. [12]
The corporate identity shift is also literal: MicroStrategy rebranded as Strategy earlier in 2025, and later completed a legal name change to Strategy Inc effective August 11, 2025, while maintaining ticker symbols including MSTR (common) and preferred tickers like STRK, STRF, STRD, STRC. [13]
Analyst forecasts and price targets: why the range is so wide
Wall Street’s view of Strategy is… not subtle. Targets are high, dispersion is huge, and the underlying assumption is usually some combination of:
- Bitcoin price trajectory
- Strategy’s ability to finance further BTC accumulation
- Whether MSTR trades at a premium (or discount) to its crypto-backed net asset value
- Market appetite for continued equity dilution and preferred issuance
Here are the most widely circulated, current target datapoints shaping the conversation into December 24:
- Citigroup: Cut its MSTR price target to $325 from $485, while maintaining a Buy rating (reported December 22). [14]
- Nasdaq / Fintel compilation: As of December 21, an average one-year price target around $513.66, with forecasts ranging roughly $328.25 to $740.25 (figures vary by data vendor and contributing analysts). [15]
- MarketBeat consensus snapshot (December 24): “Moderate Buy” consensus and an average target around $465.13, with the stock trading near $158. [16]
The headline here isn’t “analysts bullish” or “analysts bearish.” It’s that analysts are effectively pricing the stock as a structured bet on Bitcoin plus financing execution, not as a normal software company with ordinary cash flows.
The macro risk hanging over the stock: potential index exclusion
One of the most consequential overhangs into early 2026 isn’t Bitcoin itself—it’s index eligibility.
Reuters reported that MSCI has been consulting on whether to exclude companies whose digital asset holdings exceed 50% of total assets from its global equity benchmarks, arguing that such firms resemble investment funds rather than operating companies. MSCI is expected to announce a decision by January 15, 2026, and analysts warned exclusion could reduce demand for Strategy shares—potentially in the billions of dollars—because passive funds track index compositions. [17]
This matters to Strategy’s model because selling stock is part of how the company funds its Bitcoin strategy. If index-linked demand weakens, the cost of capital can rise—making future BTC accumulation harder or more dilutive.
What to watch next: the real catalysts after December 24
Into year-end and early 2026, the most important “next steps” for Strategy Inc stock are concrete and calendar-driven:
- MSCI decision timeline: Public consultation and a decision expected by January 15, 2026. [18]
- Next earnings window: MarketBeat estimates Strategy’s next report as February 4, 2026 (after market close), based on past reporting patterns. [19]
- Weekly/periodic BTC and financing updates: Investors will be watching whether the company resumes BTC purchases, continues building the USD Reserve, or leans more heavily into preferred issuance. [20]
The bigger picture for investors following MSTR today
As of December 24, 2025, Strategy’s stock story is no longer a one-variable equation. It’s more like a three-body problem (and, like all three-body problems, it gets chaotic fast):
- Bitcoin price and volatility
- Strategy’s financing machine (equity ATM + preferred structures + debt)
- Market plumbing (index rules, passive flows, and what “counts” as an operating company)
Saylor’s messaging suggests Strategy wants to be valued not just as “Bitcoin exposure,” but as an issuer of “digital credit” style instruments built around a Bitcoin-heavy balance sheet. Whether the market rewards that ambition—or punishes it as complexity—will likely hinge on what happens first: a BTC recovery, a capital-markets re-rating, or an index-rule shock.
References
1. www.marketbeat.com, 2. www.investopedia.com, 3. assets.contentstack.io, 4. assets.contentstack.io, 5. assets.contentstack.io, 6. www.strategy.com, 7. www.investing.com, 8. assets.contentstack.io, 9. www.strategy.com, 10. www.investopedia.com, 11. www.investopedia.com, 12. www.investopedia.com, 13. www.nasdaq.com, 14. www.marketbeat.com, 15. www.nasdaq.com, 16. www.marketbeat.com, 17. www.reuters.com, 18. www.reuters.com, 19. www.marketbeat.com, 20. assets.contentstack.io
