Today: 20 March 2026
Subscribe
Browse Category

NASDAQ:CTAS 2 December 2025 - 6 March 2026

UniFirst Corporation Stock Jumps After Report Says Cintas Is Nearing a Deal Above $275 a Share

UniFirst Corporation Stock Jumps After Report Says Cintas Is Nearing a Deal Above $275 a Share

Cintas is in advanced talks to acquire UniFirst for over $275 a share, or about $5.2 billion, Bloomberg Law reported. UniFirst stock jumped 13.6% in premarket trading Friday. The companies have negotiated on and off since 2022, with Cintas’ latest offer representing a 64% premium. Any deal would require a contract, shareholder approval, and could face antitrust scrutiny.
6 March 2026
··
UniFirst stock jumps after report of renewed Cintas takeover talks — what investors watch next

UniFirst stock jumps after report of renewed Cintas takeover talks — what investors watch next

UniFirst shares surged 15% to $230.01 premarket Tuesday after Bloomberg reported takeover talks with Cintas. Cintas confirmed a $275-per-share cash offer in December, valuing UniFirst at $5.2 billion. UniFirst’s board is reviewing the proposal with advisers and has not commented further. Trading volume in UniFirst quadrupled, while investors await updates from either company.
11 February 2026
··
UniFirst Corporation Stock (UNF) Jumps After Cintas Renews $275 Buyout Offer — News, Forecasts, and What’s Next

UniFirst Corporation Stock (UNF) Jumps After Cintas Renews $275 Buyout Offer — News, Forecasts, and What’s Next

Cintas Corporation made a $5.2 billion all-cash offer to acquire UniFirst at $275 per share, its third attempt to buy the company. UniFirst confirmed receipt of the non-binding proposal and said its board is reviewing the bid. UniFirst shares jumped 18% to $201 after the news, well below the offer price. Cintas included a $350 million reverse termination fee if regulators block the deal.
22 December 2025
···
Cintas (CTAS) Stock on December 2, 2025: Institutions Buy the Dip as Analysts See Mid‑Teens Upside

Cintas (CTAS) Stock on December 2, 2025: Institutions Buy the Dip as Analysts See Mid‑Teens Upside

Cintas Corporation closed at $184.19 on December 2, 2025, near its 52-week low and down about 17% over the past year, despite continued revenue growth and strong margins. Arrowstreet Capital, Panagora Asset Management, and Edgestream Partners have all increased their stakes in recent filings. Cintas’ market cap stands near $75 billion, with the stock trading at over 40 times trailing earnings.
3 December 2025
·
Cintas Stock (CTAS) on December 1, 2025: Price, Q1 2026 Earnings Beat, Dividend Hike and 2026–2028 Forecast

Cintas Stock (CTAS) on December 1, 2025: Price, Q1 2026 Earnings Beat, Dividend Hike and 2026–2028 Forecast

Cintas shares closed at $185.43 on December 1, 2025, down nearly 19% from the June high of $229.24 and just above the 52-week low. The company reported Q1 FY 2026 revenue of $2.72 billion, up 8.7% year over year, and net income of $491.1 million. Cintas announced a new $1 billion buyback and extended its dividend growth streak. The stock trades at about 41–42 times trailing earnings.
2 December 2025
····

Stock Market Today

  • Nevada Temporarily Bans Prediction Market Firm Kalshi Over Gaming License Dispute
    March 20, 2026, 2:30 PM EDT. Kalshi, a prediction markets platform offering event-based contracts on sports, elections, and entertainment, was temporarily banned in Nevada by a 14-day restraining order from the First Judicial District Court. The ruling prohibits Kalshi from operating its derivatives exchange without a gaming license, marking the first state-level forced cessation for the company. The ban follows earlier Nevada cease-and-desist actions and precedes a likely extension through the legal case, said gaming attorney Daniel Wallach. The dispute comes amid mounting regulatory scrutiny nationally, including criminal charges from Arizona and ongoing battles in multiple states. Kalshi contends its sports contracts are financial swaps, not gambling, a view supported by the federal Commodity Futures Trading Commission, which claims jurisdiction over these markets. This case highlights tensions between state gambling laws and federally regulated prediction markets.
Go toTop