Netflix stock is back in the spotlight – and not just because of a buzzy new series.
As of December 6, 2025, Netflix, Inc. (NASDAQ: NFLX) is trading around $100 per share after a 10‑for‑1 stock split completed in November, giving the company a market cap of roughly $425 billion. [1] The stock has been volatile in recent days: investors are digesting a landmark deal to acquire Warner Bros. Discovery’s studio and streaming business, a Q3 earnings report distorted by a one‑off Brazilian tax charge, and a premium valuation that already bakes in a lot of growth.
Yet even after the recent pullback, Netflix shares are still up about 15% year‑to‑date, a reminder that the longer‑term trend has been firmly upward. [2] Wall Street now has to answer a different question than “Can streaming work?” — it’s now “Is Netflix about to become too big to comfortably own?”
Let’s break down where Netflix stock stands today, what the Warner Bros deal changes, and how analysts are re‑running the numbers for 2026 and beyond.
Netflix stock today: price, split, and recent performance
On December 6, 2025, NFLX is trading near $100.24, down about 3% on the day, with an intraday range between roughly $97.9 and $104.8. That price reflects Netflix’s 10‑for‑1 stock split, which went into effect in early November and simply cut the share price into smaller pieces without changing the company’s overall value. [3]
A few other key snapshot metrics:
- 52‑week range: approximately $82 to $134 per share. [4]
- Market capitalization: about $425 billion, putting Netflix firmly in mega‑cap territory. [5]
- Recent action: shares have sold off in the last week as investors process the Warner Bros acquisition, with the stock down as much as 4% intraday on the announcement, but still mid‑teens higher year‑to‑date. [6]
Short‑term traders are clearly uneasy with the sudden jump in deal risk and leverage. But to understand whether that pullback is a buying opportunity or the start of something nastier, you have to look at the two big drivers of the story: the Warner Bros megadeal and Netflix’s underlying fundamentals.
Inside the Warner Bros megadeal: $72B equity, $82.7B enterprise value, huge IP
On December 5, Netflix announced that it will acquire Warner Bros. Discovery’s TV and film studios plus its streaming assets (HBO, HBO Max, DC Studios and more) in a deal that values the business at $72 billion in equity and about $82.7 billion in enterprise value. [7]
Deal structure and timing
Key terms from the merger announcement and regulatory filings:
- Consideration: Warner Bros Discovery (WBD) shareholders get $27.75 per share, split into:
- $23.25 in cash, and
- $4.50 in Netflix stock, subject to a collar to manage price swings. [8]
- Scope: Netflix is buying the studio and streaming businesses, while legacy cable networks (like CNN and Discovery’s linear channels) are being spun off into a separate company called Discovery Global. [9]
- Timeline: the deal is expected to close 12–18 months after Warner’s spin‑off of Discovery Global, which is now targeted for Q3 2026, implying a late‑2026 closing if regulators approve. [10]
- Synergies and breakup fee: Netflix and Warner project $2–3 billion in annual cost savings by year three and agreed to a breakup fee of about $5.8 billion if Netflix walks away. [11]
In strategic terms, this gives Netflix control over some of the most important franchises in modern entertainment — including Game of Thrones, the DC superhero universe, and Harry Potter — alongside its own originals like Stranger Things and Squid Game. [12]
How Netflix is paying for it
This is not a small, cash‑from‑the‑couch transaction. To fund the purchase, Netflix is leaning heavily on debt markets:
- A $59 billion bridge loan, led by Wells Fargo, one of the largest such loans on record.
- Plans to refinance that with roughly $25 billion in unsecured bonds, $20 billion in term loans, and a $5 billion revolving credit facility over time. [13]
Netflix CFO Spencer Neumann has acknowledged that this will temporarily push leverage higher, but says the company intends to bring key debt metrics back to target levels within roughly two years, relying on strong free cash flow and the promised cost savings. [14]
For equity holders, that means the stock’s risk profile shifts: Netflix is no longer just a high‑margin, low‑debt streaming platform; it’s becoming a highly levered entertainment conglomerate.
Regulatory and political risk
Regulators and politicians immediately noticed the size of this deal.
- Antitrust concerns: U.S. and European regulators are expected to closely scrutinize the merger given the combination of Netflix + HBO Max + Warner’s film and TV libraries, with critics arguing it could reduce competition and harm theaters and consumers. [15]
- Political pushback: Lawmakers from both parties in the U.S. have raised concerns, with Republicans warning about concentration of content power and Democrats like Senator Elizabeth Warren criticizing the potential impact on workers and consumer choice. [16]
- Merger agreement signals: Reporting on the merger contract notes unusually detailed clauses around antitrust risk and potential remedies, underscoring how seriously both sides take the chance that the deal could be delayed or even blocked. [17]
If regulators ultimately reject the transaction, Netflix would owe that multi‑billion‑dollar breakup fee and walk away with higher debt and nothing to show for it. If it’s approved, Netflix gains unprecedented scale and bargaining power — but also takes on integration headaches and ongoing scrutiny.
How the market is reacting
The short‑term market verdict has been cautious:
- Netflix shares fell as much as 4% on the day of the announcement and have extended a week‑long slide, even though the stock remains up mid‑teens for the year. [18]
- Warner Bros Discovery stock jumped 3–4% on the news as investors welcomed the premium bid. [19]
- Commentary from outlets like Reuters Breakingviews and Morningstar has described the deal as carrying a modest near‑term financial return, with an estimated low‑single‑digit initial ROI and heavy regulatory risk — essentially a strategic swing more than a financial lay‑up. [20]
In other words: Netflix is betting that owning the crown jewels of legacy Hollywood is worth a lot more than what the spreadsheet says in year one.
Q3 2025 results: strong growth, Brazil tax drag, and a shift in focus
Underneath the splashy M&A headlines, Netflix’s core business is still putting up big numbers.
Headline Q3 2025 figures
From Netflix’s Q3 2025 shareholder letter and SEC filings: [21]
- Revenue: $11.51 billion, up about 17% year‑over‑year (17.2% in the company’s table).
- Operating income: $3.25 billion (roughly $3.2B), up 12% year‑over‑year.
- Operating margin:28.2%, below the 31.5% guidance mainly due to a one‑time tax charge.
- Net income: about $2.55 billion, up from $2.36 billion a year ago. [22]
- Free cash flow:$2.66 billion in the quarter, supported by disciplined content spend and strong cash collections. [23]
Revenue landed essentially in line with forecasts, but profits missed Wall Street expectations because of a surprise $619 million tax charge tied to a longstanding dispute with Brazilian authorities over non‑income tax assessments. Netflix booked that expense as cost of revenue, shaving more than five percentage points off the Q3 operating margin. [24]
Management stressed that the Brazil issue is a one‑time hit that won’t materially affect future results, but the margin reset was enough to knock the stock down 5–7% in the trading days after earnings. [25]
2025 outlook: slower margin, stronger cash
For full‑year 2025, Netflix now expects: [26]
- Revenue: about $45.1 billion, up 16% year‑over‑year.
- Operating margin:29%, trimmed from a prior 30% target because of the Brazil tax charge.
- Free cash flow: around $9 billion, up from a previous forecast of $8.0–8.5 billion.
For Q4 2025, the company is guiding to:
- Revenue of $11.96 billion, about 16–17% growth.
- Operating margin of 23.9%, roughly two percentage points higher than the prior year’s Q4 margin despite heavier content spending. [27]
That guidance assumes a powerful Q4 slate, including the final season of Stranger Things, new seasons of The Diplomat and Nobody Wants This, and big‑ticket films like Guillermo del Toro’s Frankenstein and the new Knives Out sequel Wake Up Dead Man. [28]
From subscriber counting to revenue, margins, and engagement
Starting this year, Netflix stopped reporting quarterly subscriber numbers, asking investors to focus on revenue growth, operating margin, free cash flow, and engagement as the primary scorecard. [29]
External estimates, however, still track the user base. Reuters, for example, recently pegged Netflix at over 301 million subscribers, compared with about 196 million across Disney’s services. [30]
The more important story is revenue per member:
- Paid sharing and price increases in many markets are driving ARPU higher.
- The ad‑supported tier continues to scale, with Netflix delivering its best‑ever quarter of ad sales in Q3 and projecting that ad revenue will more than double in 2025. [31]
That mix — higher ARPU, ads, and strong engagement — is why Netflix can credibly forecast mid‑teens revenue growth and high‑20s operating margins even before layering in Warner Bros.
How Wall Street views Netflix now: targets, valuations, and models
Analysts have had to do some fast spreadsheet acrobatics in the last 48 hours.
Consensus price targets and ratings
Two widely tracked aggregators, MarketBeat and StockAnalysis, show broadly similar pictures as of early December:
- Average 12‑month price target: about $134–135 per share, implying roughly 34% upside from the current ~$100 stock price. [32]
- Rating: a “Buy” or “Moderate Buy” consensus, with a clear majority of analysts at Buy/Strong Buy and a minority at Hold. [33]
- Target range: lows around $87.50 and highs up to $160, reflecting wide disagreement over valuation and post‑merger execution. [34]
Recent rating moves include:
- Rosenblatt reiterating a Strong Buy with a $152 target.
- Barclays keeping a Hold/Neutral rating and a more cautious $110 target.
- JP Morgan maintaining a Hold around $124–128. [35]
That mix tells you the street is bullish on the long‑term business, but split on how much the Warner deal actually adds versus how much risk it introduces.
Growth and earnings expectations
StockAnalysis’ aggregated forecasts suggest that analysts still see Netflix as a healthy growth story even without the Warner Bros upside fully modeled in: [36]
- Revenue 2025: about $46 billion, up nearly 18% from 2024.
- Revenue 2026: around $52 billion, another ~13% growth.
- EPS 2025: roughly $2.60 (split‑adjusted), up about 31%.
- EPS 2026: around $3.30, implying ~27% EPS growth.
Meanwhile, Reuters recently estimated Netflix’s forward P/E around 39–40x, significantly above other big‑tech peers, highlighting how much optimism is already embedded in the stock. [37]
Alternative valuations: DCFs and algorithmic models
Not all models are equally enthusiastic:
- A discounted cash flow (DCF) analysis from SimplyWall.St suggests that, as of December 2025, Netflix may be about 19% overvalued relative to its calculated fair value, even before fully factoring in Warner integration risk. [38]
- Algorithmic forecasts from CoinCodex put the expected 2025 trading range around $101–$105, very close to today’s price, and project a wide 2030 range between roughly $65 and $154, underlining just how uncertain long‑term prediction really is. [39]
- A recent fundamental analysis from Tikr suggests Netflix stock could reach around $141 by 2027 in a base‑case scenario, implying mid‑teens annualized returns if execution remains strong. [40]
The punchline: most serious models agree Netflix will keep growing; they just disagree about how much you should pay for that growth given the new M&A and regulatory risks.
Bull vs. bear: key arguments around Netflix stock after the Warner deal
To understand the investment debate now, it helps to think in terms of two competing stories.
The bull case: scale, IP, and cash flow
Supporters of the stock point to several advantages:
- Best‑in‑class growth and margins in streaming. Netflix is guiding to 16% revenue growth and 29% operating margins for 2025, with approximately $9 billion in free cash flow, metrics that most traditional media companies can only dream about. [41]
- Massive IP library and content efficiency. The Warner deal would combine Netflix’s data‑driven production machine with some of the most valuable franchises in film and TV history, potentially allowing Netflix to spread content costs over a much larger audience and re‑monetize older titles through ads, games, and licensing. [42]
- Advertising and pricing power. Record ad sales in Q3 plus a fast‑growing ad‑supported tier suggest Netflix can keep raising ARPU without blowing up churn, especially as rival streamers hike prices or trim libraries. Management and outside analysts alike expect ad revenue to more than double in 2025. [43]
- Moat from engagement and product. Netflix continues to post record viewing share in key markets like the U.S. and U.K., and is investing in personalized discovery, new interfaces, and even gaming — giving it multiple ways to keep users glued to its ecosystem. [44]
From that standpoint, paying a high multiple for a company that could become the default global home of premium video — plus HBO and DC — looks rational.
The bear case: overpaying, over‑levering, and over‑regulated?
Skeptics see a different picture:
- Pricey deal, modest financial return. Analysts at Reuters Breakingviews estimate that the Warner acquisition offers an initial return on investment of only around 4%, far below what investors typically expect from such a large, risky deal. [45]
- Leverage and interest‑rate risk. Taking on a $59 billion bridge loan and tens of billions more in bonds and loans pushes Netflix into a meaningfully higher‑leverage zone at a time when interest rates are still elevated compared with the last decade. [46]
- Regulatory uncertainty. With both U.S. parties and European authorities already voicing concerns, there is a real possibility of delays, forced divestitures, or even a blocked deal, which would trigger that multi‑billion‑dollar breakup fee. [47]
- Valuation already rich. Even before the merger, Netflix traded at around 40x forward earnings, well above many mega‑cap tech peers. DCF‑based approaches now flag the stock as potentially overvalued by close to 20%, especially if revenue growth settles into the low‑teens instead of staying in the mid‑teens. [48]
- Execution risk: from focused streamer to sprawling conglomerate. History is littered with giant media deals — AOL–Time Warner, AT&T–Time Warner — that looked brilliant on paper and painful in reality. Bears worry Netflix could lose focus on product and culture as it inherits legacy studio structures, theatrical obligations, and complex labor relationships. [49]
In short: the bear case isn’t “Netflix is dying.” It’s “Netflix might be great, but at this price and with this much new risk, the odds are no longer stacked in your favor.”
What investors should watch in 2026 and beyond
Whether you’re bullish, bearish, or just streaming this drama from the sidelines, there are a few key signposts to track.
1. Regulatory milestones for the Warner deal
Watch for:
- Formal antitrust filings in the U.S., EU, and U.K.
- Potential remedy proposals, such as commitments around licensing, theatrical windows, or partial asset sales.
- Any signs that regulators may push for structural changes (for example, requiring Netflix to keep HBO Max separate or divest certain channels or franchises). [50]
The longer the review drags on, the more investors will worry about the breakup fee and opportunity cost.
2. Leverage, interest costs, and free cash flow
The bridge‑loan financing and subsequent bond and loan issuance will change Netflix’s balance sheet fast. The key questions:
- Does free cash flow stay near or above $9 billion as promised?
- How quickly does management term out the bridge loan into longer‑dated debt, and at what average interest rate? [51]
If leverage peaks and then trends lower as FCF grows, markets may reward the stock for pulling off a high‑wire act. If FCF disappoints while interest costs bite, the narrative flips very quickly.
3. Ad business and pricing power
Investors will be watching metrics like:
- Adoption of the ad‑supported tier in key regions.
- Growth in ad ARPU and total ad revenue contribution.
- Whether Netflix can continue raising prices without reversing engagement gains or pushing users back toward piracy or free alternatives like YouTube and TikTok. [52]
Ad businesses tend to be cyclical and sensitive to macro slowdowns, so the next downturn will be a real‑world test.
4. Integration of Warner IP and services
Finally, the real fun: how Netflix actually uses what it’s buying.
Key strategic decisions include:
- Whether to bundle Netflix and HBO Max, fully merge them, or keep separate brands under one corporate roof. [53]
- How aggressively Netflix pushes theatrical releases for Warner films versus using them primarily as streaming content. [54]
- How quickly major franchises like DC and Harry Potter are integrated into Netflix’s global slate of series, films, games, and live experiences (like the planned “Netflix House” venues). [55]
The more clearly investors see a coherent, cash‑generating strategy around that IP, the more likely they are to look past near‑term margin noise.
Bottom line: A bigger, riskier, more central Netflix
As of December 6, 2025, Netflix stock sits at a crossroads:
- The core streaming business is strong, growing revenue in the mid‑teens with high‑20s margins and outsized free cash flow.
- The Warner Bros acquisition could solidify Netflix as the dominant global entertainment platform, with unmatched IP and scale — or become a cautionary tale about overreaching in media M&A.
- Analysts mostly like the story, with average price targets about one‑third above the current share price, but they’re far from unanimous on what the shares are worth.
For investors, this is less a simple “growth stock vs value stock” decision and more a philosophical bet on how the entertainment industry will be structured in the 2030s: fragmented between many platforms, or consolidated into a small number of global giants.
References
1. in.investing.com, 2. www.businessinsider.com, 3. finance.yahoo.com, 4. in.investing.com, 5. in.investing.com, 6. www.businessinsider.com, 7. ir.netflix.net, 8. www.prnewswire.com, 9. apnews.com, 10. www.telegraphindia.com, 11. www.reuters.com, 12. www.reuters.com, 13. www.ft.com, 14. www.ft.com, 15. www.reuters.com, 16. www.reuters.com, 17. www.mlex.com, 18. www.businessinsider.com, 19. www.reuters.com, 20. www.reuters.com, 21. static.poder360.com.br, 22. www.marketwatch.com, 23. static.poder360.com.br, 24. static.poder360.com.br, 25. www.reuters.com, 26. static.poder360.com.br, 27. www.thewrap.com, 28. www.nasdaq.com, 29. www.home.saxo, 30. www.reuters.com, 31. www.ft.com, 32. stockanalysis.com, 33. stockanalysis.com, 34. stockanalysis.com, 35. stockanalysis.com, 36. stockanalysis.com, 37. www.reuters.com, 38. simplywall.st, 39. coincodex.com, 40. www.tikr.com, 41. static.poder360.com.br, 42. ir.netflix.net, 43. www.ft.com, 44. static.poder360.com.br, 45. www.reuters.com, 46. www.ft.com, 47. www.reuters.com, 48. www.reuters.com, 49. entertainmentstrategyguy.com, 50. www.reuters.com, 51. www.ft.com, 52. www.ft.com, 53. www.reuters.com, 54. www.reuters.com, 55. www.reuters.com
