Rutland MP says council ignored locals, presses minister for Rutland-Stamford reform meeting
15 January 2026
1 min read

Rutland MP says council ignored locals, presses minister for Rutland-Stamford reform meeting

OAKHAM, England, Jan 15, 2026, 16:06 GMT

  • MP Alicia Kearns, representing Rutland and Stamford, called on ministers to take action on local government reform
  • Kearns noted that Rutland County Council supported a plan despite survey feedback showing most residents oppose it
  • Local government minister Alison McGovern said she is willing to meet MPs to discuss the matter

Rutland and Stamford MP Alicia Kearns has called on the UK government to hold a meeting about local government reform, accusing Rutland County Council of moving forward with a plan she claims residents oppose.

This dispute matters now as ministers consider plans to merge councils and reshape service delivery in parts of England—a move that could transfer control over planning, social care, waste services, and more.

In Rutland and nearby areas, the debate is anything but theoretical. The proposed models would steer Rutland either toward sections of Leicestershire or push it closer to a Rutland-and-Stamford partnership with ties to South Lincolnshire.

In a statement, Kearns said the council knew “the majority of Rutlanders overwhelmingly do not support re-joining Leicestershire” but was “steam roll[ing] ahead with very little support.” She highlighted a council survey that never directly asked residents which reorganisation they preferred. Instead, 45% of respondents mentioned support for a union with South Lincolnshire in an “other comments” box; about a third opposed joining Leicestershire; and a quarter rejected a single unitary model combining Leicestershire and Leicester. Rutland County Council did not respond to requests for comment, the report said. (Oakham Nub News)

On Jan. 12, Kearns brought up the matter in Parliament, accusing Rutland’s council of “leaving our fate in the hands of others” and deliberately not consulting residents. She pushed for a meeting to discuss a “Rutland and Stamford” model with local input. Local government minister Alison McGovern called it “a complicated situation” but said she was “always happy” to meet MPs. (Hansard)

A unitary authority handles all local services in a region through a single tier of government, unlike the two-tier system where county and district councils divide duties. (Gov)

Yet a ministerial meeting doesn’t seal the deal. The government could switch to another option, and local councils may continue pushing their favored models as talks and consultations proceed behind the scenes.

Kearns has cast the dispute not just as a boundary issue but as a democratic shortfall, insisting that people in Rutland and Stamford deserve a direct say on the choices that will define their local government for years to come.

Stock Market Today

  • Trane Technologies debuts September 18 options; $380 put and $400 call offer YieldBoost opportunities
    January 15, 2026, 11:59 AM EST. Trane Technologies plc (TT) began trading new September 18 options. A $380 put bids at $27.20, enabling a sell-to-open that could establish a $352.80 effective cost basis if assigned, versus the $389.03 spot. The strike sits roughly 3% below the current price, keeping the put out-of-the-money. YieldBoost from Stock Options Channel assigns about a 62% chance the option expires worthless, with a potential 7.16% return on cash and 10.62% annualized. On the call side, the $400 strike bids $34.20; selling a covered call at that strike could yield about 11.61% total return if TT is called away at expiry. Trailing twelve-month history and fundamentals provide context for the setup.
TSMC sparks chip-stock surge as Wall Street rebounds on bank earnings
Previous Story

TSMC sparks chip-stock surge as Wall Street rebounds on bank earnings

Goldman Sachs stock jumps on earnings beat and dividend hike as traders cash in on volatility
Next Story

Goldman Sachs stock jumps on earnings beat and dividend hike as traders cash in on volatility

Go toTop