Doomed SpaceX Starlink Satellite 35956 Photographed From Orbit After In‑Space Anomaly Spreads Debris

Dec. 24, 2025 — A rare, close-up orbital photograph has provided a clearer look at a SpaceX Starlink satellite that suffered an in-space anomaly and is now tumbling toward reentry, while a growing debris field underscores how quickly low Earth orbit can become more complicated — and potentially more dangerous — as megaconstellations expand. ^[1]

The satellite, identified as Starlink 35956, lost communications after the incident and began an unexpected descent from its operational altitude. SpaceX says the spacecraft and associated debris are expected to burn up in Earth’s atmosphere “within weeks,” and that the satellite’s path remains below the International Space Station’s orbit, posing no risk to the ISS or its crew. ^[2]

What happened to Starlink 35956 — and why the “explosion” talk started

SpaceX and Starlink have described the event as an anomaly that occurred on Dec. 17, leading to a sudden loss of communication at roughly 418 kilometers (about 260 miles) altitude. Starlink’s account says the anomaly triggered venting from the propulsion tank, a rapid change in orbit (reported as roughly 4 kilometers of decay), and the release of a small number of trackable objects moving at low relative velocity. ^[3]

That combination — abrupt comms loss, venting, and new trackable fragments — is why multiple observers and outlets have characterized the event as a minor on-orbit “explosion” or energetic breakup, even though there’s no indication of a high-speed collision. Reuters reported that the rapid drop in altitude suggested an internal event, while LeoLabs assessed it was “likely” driven by an internal energetic source rather than an impact with another object. ^[4]

Key point: so far, the public reporting and tracking assessments lean toward an internal failure (for example, a propulsion-system issue), not a collision — but SpaceX has not publicly confirmed a specific root cause. ^[5]

The orbit photo that changed the story from “data” to “evidence”

What’s new in the latest coverage is the extraordinary orbital imagery: SpaceX asked Vantor (formerly known as Maxar Intelligence) to image the satellite to better understand its condition. Vantor used its WorldView‑3 Earth-observing satellite to capture a high-resolution image of Starlink 35956 on Dec. 18, from about 241 kilometers (150 miles) away, while both spacecraft passed over Alaska. ^[6]

Space.com reported the image resolution at roughly 12 centimeters — sharp enough to confirm the satellite appeared mostly intact even after the anomaly, while still leaving open the question of what failed inside the vehicle. ^[7]

Why this matters beyond one Starlink satellite:

It’s a fast diagnostic tool. Instead of relying only on telemetry (which is unavailable if a spacecraft is unresponsive), operators can sometimes use other satellites to visually assess damage. ^[8]
It’s also a sign of how space monitoring is evolving. High-resolution commercial imaging isn’t just about Earth observation anymore — it’s increasingly relevant to space safety and “space domain awareness.” ^[9]

Debris: “small number” vs. “hundreds” — why estimates differ

One of the biggest open questions is how much debris the event produced.

Starlink has repeatedly emphasized a small number of trackable objects. ^[10]
Tracking firms and observers have suggested larger counts. Reuters reported LeoLabs detected “tens” of likely debris objects, with the possibility of additional fragments as analysis continues. ^[11]
The Register, citing astronaut and LeoLabs co-founder Ed Lu, reported that hundreds of debris objects associated with the incident were being tracked and had spread thousands of kilometers along the orbital track within days. ^[12]

These numbers can diverge for a few reasons that don’t necessarily contradict each other:

“Trackable” has a threshold. Some fragments are too small for routine cataloging but still matter for risk modeling.
Counts change over time. Tracking networks may identify additional fragments days later as objects separate and their orbits diverge. ^[13]
Different networks see different things. Radar coverage, sensitivity, and processing methods vary across organizations. ^[14]

Where the satellite is now, as of Dec. 24, 2025

By early Dec. 24, publicly displayed tracking data showed Starlink 35956 continuing to lose altitude, placing it around the high‑300s kilometers above Earth — notably lower than its reported 418 km altitude at the time communications were lost. ^[15]

A public listing for the object also said U.S. Space Forces–Space confirmed an anomalous debris event and assessed no risk to the ISS, while analysis remained ongoing. ^[16]

SpaceX’s public messaging remains consistent: the satellite is tumbling, largely intact, and expected to reenter and fully demise within weeks. ^[17]

Why this incident is drawing outsized attention

A single satellite failure isn’t unusual in spaceflight. What makes this case stand out is the way it hits several pressure points in 2025’s fast-changing orbital environment:

1) Low Earth orbit is getting crowded — fast

The Verge summarized the incident in the context of an orbital region where tens of thousands of objects are already being tracked, and where the total number of satellites could surge dramatically by the end of the decade. ^[18]

2) Starlink’s scale changes what “rare” looks like

SpaceX operates the largest constellation ever assembled. Space.com put the active fleet at about 9,300 satellites, roughly 65% of all operational satellites in Earth orbit. In a system that large, even low-probability failures can become recurring events in absolute terms — and every breakup, even a minor one, adds to the tracking and collision-avoidance burden. ^[19]

3) Debris doesn’t have to be catastrophic to be consequential

Reuters characterized this as smaller than major breakup events that created hundreds of fragments, but still noted the broader push for clearer “rules of the road” and coordination as space activity accelerates. ^[20]

4) The “close approach” backdrop keeps orbit safety in the headlines

The Starlink 35956 anomaly came amid wider discussion about close calls in orbit and the need for better coordination among satellite operators — concerns raised in both mainstream and industry-focused coverage. ^[21]

What SpaceX says it’s doing next

SpaceX has said it is working with NASA and the U.S. Space Force to monitor the debris, while engineers investigate what caused the anomaly. Starlink has also stated it is already deploying software changes to increase protections against similar events. ^[22]

While SpaceX has not published a detailed failure analysis, the messaging points to two immediate priorities:

Contain operational risk (track fragments, ensure separation from higher orbits like the ISS)
Prevent recurrence (identify root cause and harden the fleet via software and operational procedures) ^[23]

What to watch in the coming days

For readers following the Starlink satellite debris story into the end of December, these are the practical developments that tend to change the picture:

Updated debris counts as tracking networks refine catalogs and identify additional objects. ^[24]
More detail on the failure mechanism if SpaceX publicly shares what went wrong inside the propulsion system. ^[25]
Reentry timing updates, as atmospheric conditions and drag determine how quickly the tumbling craft comes down. ^[26]
Whether orbital imagery becomes standard for diagnosing satellite anomalies — especially for large constellations where rapid assessment can reduce uncertainty and improve safety. ^[27]

For now, the most striking takeaway from Dec. 24’s developments is simple: a satellite can fail, break off trackable fragments, and still remain mostly intact — and we can now see it clearly from space. That new visibility is powerful, but it also highlights a growing reality: in a busier low Earth orbit, even “small” debris events quickly become everyone’s problem. ^[28]