NEW YORK, July 13, 2026, 08:08 EDT
Mint Incorporation Limited NASDAQ:MIMI jumped about 33% to $2.86 before Monday’s U.S. open, with 21.9 million shares traded by 8:01 a.m. EDT. That volume was roughly 14 times both its 1.52 million-share public float — the stock available for public trading — and its 65-day average full-session volume.
The turnover is the immediate story. The same shares can change hands more than once, so the figure does not mean 14 separate buyers acquired every available share; it does show unusually fast recycling of a tiny float. Mint’s filings page showed no SEC report after June 30, while Friday’s move had already accelerated after the close, when the stock rose 19.2% to $2.54.
The jump was not shared by listed robotics names tied to the sector Mint is trying to enter. Serve Robotics NASDAQ:SERV, Richtech Robotics NASDAQ:RR and Palladyne AI (NASDAQ:PDYN) were each lower in premarket trade. On a float-adjusted basis, their activity was a fraction of Mint’s.
| Company | Premarket move | Premarket volume | Volume/public float |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mint Incorporation | +33.0% | 21.90 million | 1,440% |
| Serve Robotics | -0.7% | 44,020 | 0.06% |
| Richtech Robotics | -1.2% | 97,130 | 0.05% |
| Palladyne AI | -0.2% | 14,870 | 0.05% |
Even after the jump, Mint shares were about 93% below their split-adjusted initial public offering price. The company sold stock at $4 in January 2025, then carried out a 1-for-10 reverse split on May 6, 2026 — combining 10 old shares into one — which makes the original offer price equivalent to $40 on today’s share basis.
The latest disclosed operating numbers are much smaller than Monday’s trading flow. For the six months through Sept. 30, 2025, revenue fell 26.2% to $988,398, gross margin narrowed to 4.4%, and Mint posted an $8.58 million net loss, including $7.82 million of share-based marketing expense. Cash stood at $4.09 million.
That balance sheet is now being asked to support a string of robotics deals. On the disclosed figures, one completed contribution plus two announced funding commitments total about $5.46 million, above the last reported cash balance. The comparison is not a current liquidity statement: the dates differ, some commitments can be staged, and Mint has since raised additional cash.
| Cash or capital item | Amount | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Cash and equivalents | $4.09 million | Balance at Sept. 30, 2025 |
| YAS Robotics contribution | $1.00 million | Paid Dec. 15, 2025 |
| Axonex-Synergy funding | Up to HK$20 million, about $2.55 million | Staged; tied to milestones and approvals |
| Rice Robotics funding | HK$15 million, about $1.91 million | Committed under May joint venture |
| Related-party placement | +$0.64 million | Cash received May 26 |
Mint’s June 30 non-binding memorandum of understanding with Ascendze — an outline rather than a final contract — could add another call on capital. The company said it wants a controlling or majority stake and may provide further funding. Chairman and CEO Damian Chan called the deal “an important milestone”; Ascendze founder Leong Kar Lee said the tie-up would “accelerate our growth.” The sides aim to sign definitive agreements within 90 days, subject to due diligence and approvals. GlobeNewswire
But the same setup cuts both ways. A tiny float and volume without a fresh company disclosure can reverse sharply, and Mint itself warned that its shares may show extreme volatility unrelated to operating performance. Its $100 million shelf registration — a framework allowing future securities sales in tranches — creates dilution risk, although primary sales are capped at one-third of public float over 12 months while that float stays below $75 million. A CEO-controlled affiliate also held 60.09% of voting power after a May Class B issue, limiting outside shareholders’ sway.
Monday’s regular session will test whether the premarket flow turns into sustained demand or fades as quickly as it arrived. The next disclosed business target is Ascendze: Mint said the parties aim for definitive agreements by late September, but the MOU remains non-binding and no transaction is assured.
