Tata Motors Stock Today (10 December 2025): PV Near 52-Week Lows, CV Near Highs as JLR Shock Meets EV Growth

Data as of mid-session on 10 December 2025. This article is for information only and is not investment advice.

One Tata Motors, Two Very Different Stocks After the Demerger

Since November, “Tata Motors stock” has stopped being a single thing.

After the long-planned demerger, investors now hold two separately listed companies:

Tata Motors Passenger Vehicles Ltd (TMPV) – India passenger vehicles plus Jaguar Land Rover (JLR)
Tata Motors Ltd (TMCV) – the commercial vehicles (CV) business, now listed as Tata Motors CV on NSE/BSE ^[1]

The key mechanics:

The demerger became effective 1 October 2025, with a record date of 14 October 2025.
Shareholders received 1 share of Tata Motors Commercial Vehicles Ltd (TMCV) for every 1 share of Tata Motors held on the record date (1:1 entitlement). ^[2]
For cost and tax purposes, about 31.15% of your original Tata Motors cost base is attributed to the CV company and 68.85% to the PV + JLR company. ^[3]
The CV business is now listed under ticker TMCV and the PV business trades under TMPV (with different exchange codes on NSE/BSE). ^[4]

Practically, that means:

When people say “Tata Motors stock crashed”, they often mean TMPV (passenger + JLR).
When they say “Tata Motors hit a new high”, that’s usually TMCV (commercial vehicles).

And on 10 December 2025, these two siblings are behaving very differently.

Tata Motors Passenger Vehicles (TMPV): Share Price Today and Technical Picture

As of around 2:08 pm IST on 10 December 2025, the Tata Motors PV (TMPV) share is:

Trading around ₹343 per share
Market capitalisation about ₹1.27 trillion
Six‑month return: about ‑53%
Three‑month return: about ‑52%
One‑year return: roughly ‑57%
Beta (6‑month): about 2.1, signalling very high volatility ^[5]

Intraday, the stock has flirted with a fresh 52‑week low around the mid‑₹340s, after previously trading as high as roughly ₹485–486 over the past year. ^[6]

At first glance the valuation looks absurdly cheap: the live blog shows a P/E near 1.3x with EPS around ₹255. ^[7]
That’s not because TMPV is suddenly the bargain of the century — it’s because of a giant one‑off accounting gain from the demerger, which inflates earnings for this year and makes simple P/E ratios basically meaningless.

Short version: the price is real, the “cheap” P/E is not.

Q2 FY26: One‑Off Profit Hides an Operational Hit

The most recent quarterly numbers (Q2 FY26, reported on 14 November 2025) were the first full set of results for TMPV as a standalone entity. The headline figures look spectacular until you read the fine print:

Consolidated revenue: about ₹72,300 crore, down ~13–13.5% YoY
EBIT (operating profit): a loss of ~₹4,900 crore
PBT before exceptional items:loss of ~₹5,500 crore
Reported net profit:~₹76,200 crore, driven almost entirely by a notional gain of ~₹82,600 crore from the disposal of “discontinued operations” in the demerger ^[8]

Strip out that demerger gain and you’re left with an underlying loss of about ₹6.37 billion, largely thanks to Jaguar Land Rover’s bad quarter. ^[9]

On the plus side, the India passenger vehicle business itself is not the problem:

Standalone revenues were up ~15.6% YoY, helped by festive demand and the GST 2.0 cut.
EBITDA margin:5.8%
EBIT margin: a thin but positive 0.2% ^[10]
Management says CNG + EV models now form around 45% of volumes, with EV sales up ~60% YoY and record monthly volumes of ~60,000 units in September. ^[11]

Domestic PV is quietly doing decent work; it’s JLR that’s kicking holes in the P&L.

JLR: Cyberattack, China Taxes and a Brutal Reset to FY26 Guidance

Jaguar Land Rover is still the profit engine of Tata Motors over the cycle — which is exactly why a bad JLR quarter hurts so much.

According to JLR’s Q2 commentary and Reuters coverage: ^[12]

A major cyberattack in early September halted production for about five weeks, forcing a one‑time charge of ~$228.5 million.
Wholesale volumes (ex‑China JV) fell roughly 24%.
Soft demand in China, higher luxury taxes there, and ongoing chip supply issues from supplier Nexperia added to the pressure.
JLR cut its FY26 operating margin target to just 0–2%, down from an already reduced 5–7%.
It now expects negative free cash flow of £2.2–2.5 billion in FY26, versus earlier guidance of roughly break-even.

In other words, the market has been told that:

The cyberattack was a real, costly operational shock.
The China + tariffs + BEV transition cocktail is hitting JLR harder than previously assumed.
The cash‑generation profile for FY26 has been downgraded in a big way.

That set the stage for the sharp derating of TMPV over the past six months.

Index Reshuffle: TMPV Gets Ejected From Sensex

Just as investors were digesting JLR’s bad news, another shoe dropped: Tata Motors Passenger Vehicles will be removed from the BSE Sensex as part of a December index reshuffle.

InterGlobe Aviation (IndiGo) will be added to the Sensex from 22 December 2025, replacing TMPV. ^[13]

Why that matters:

Sensex‑tracking index funds and ETFs will have to sell TMPV and buy IndiGo, adding mechanical outflows to a stock that is already under pressure.
Even if you ignore passive flows, getting dropped from the benchmark is a sentiment blow — it signals that TMPV no longer meets the index provider’s criteria for size, liquidity and representation after the demerger.

Combine that with JLR’s guidance reset and you get the nasty six‑month chart you’re seeing today.

What Are Analysts Saying About Tata Motors PV (TMPV)?

The Street is… divided, to put it politely.

Recent moves:

Jefferies
- Rating: Underperform
- Target cut to ₹300 from ₹605 after Q2 FY26
- Cites: weak quarter, JLR EBITDA loss due to cyberattack, headwinds from China consumption taxes, higher discounting, BEV transition costs and ageing model portfolio. Domestic PV is a bright spot but not enough to offset JLR, in Jefferies’ view. ^[14]
UBS
- Rating: Sell
- Target cut to ₹305 from ₹690 for Tata Motors Passenger Vehicles ^[15]
- Focuses on the downgraded JLR margin and FCF guidance and exposure to China‑related risks.

Not everyone is outright bearish:

Emkay Global
- Rating: ADD
- Target price ₹400, implying modest upside from late‑November levels around ₹359. ^[16]
Consensus dashboards are a bit messy because they still mix pre‑ and post‑demerger reports, but:
- One Trendlyne compilation shows an average target ~₹561, implying ~60% upside from current levels, but with a wide range of estimates. ^[17]
- TradingView’s forecast page points to a mean target around ₹380, with a range from ₹300 to ~₹490. ^[18]

Some domestic broker reports (e.g. Motilal Oswal) span everything from Sell with targets near ₹310 to Neutral with targets north of ₹600, underlining how hard TMPV is to value when JLR’s outlook is this foggy. ^[19]

Net takeaway:

The direction of travel in recent weeks is down (lots of target cuts).
Despite that, current price in the mid‑₹340s still sits below many older targets, which is why consensus screens look deceptively optimistic.

EV Business: Tata Motors Still Dominates India’s Electric Passenger Car Market

Now for the good news: the EV side of the story is still strong.

According to FADA data and recent coverage: ^[20]

In November 2025, India sold 14,850 electric passenger vehicles, up about 62% YoY.
EVs now make up 3.8% of the Indian passenger vehicle market, up from 2.8% a year ago.
Tata Motors led the market with ~6,153 EVs sold in November, a 38% YoY increase, although month‑on‑month volumes dipped after the festive season.
In October 2025, Tata sold 7,118 EVs, its second‑best month ever, and held a market share of about 40%, comfortably ahead of MG and Mahindra. ^[21]
In September 2025, Tata’s EV shipments hit a record ~9,200 units, highlighting how quickly the EV division has scaled. ^[22]

The current EV line‑up (Punch EV, Nexon EV, Tiago EV, Tigor EV, Curvv EV, Harrier EV) spans several price bands and segments, which helps Tata defend share as new competitors arrive. ^[23]

This EV optionality lives inside TMPV, not TMCV, so the EV growth story is one of the things bulls point to when they argue the PV stock is mispriced at current levels.

Tata Motors CV (TMCV): Stock Near Highs, Not Lows

While TMPV is sulking near its lows, Tata Motors CV (TMCV) is doing the opposite.

On 10 December 2025, around 2:41 pm IST, the CV stock on NSE/BSE shows: ^[24]

Share price: ~₹379 per share (NSE quote ~₹378.8, up ~1.5% intraday)
Market cap: roughly ₹1.39 trillion
52‑week range: roughly ₹306 – ₹383, with today’s trade very close to the upper end
1‑week return: about +5%, reflecting continued post‑listing strength

Just yesterday, the stock hit a new all‑time high around ₹371–372, extending a ~17% rally over two weeks, helped by strong commercial vehicle demand and positive broker commentary. ^[25]

The listing itself was enthusiastic:

TMCV listed on 12 November 2025 with a discovery price around ₹335, about 26–28% above the implied value from the demerger. ^[26]
Commentators noted that the CV business emerged debt‑light and structurally more focused, which the market clearly liked. ^[27]

So while PV investors are staring at a halved stock, CV investors are dealing with the opposite problem: how much good news is already priced in?

CV Fundamentals: High Margins, Strong FCF, and an IVECO Deal in the Works

Unlike the JLR‑hit PV business, the CV arm’s Q2 FY26 numbers look robust.

From Tata Motors’ own Q2 FY26 press release for the commercial vehicles segment: ^[28]

Q2 FY26 revenue:₹18,370 crore, +6.6% YoY
EBITDA margin:12.2% (up 150 bps YoY)
EBIT margin:9.8% (up 200 bps YoY)
PBT (before exceptional items):₹1,694 crore, up ₹469 crore YoY
Free cash flow (FCF): about ₹2,211 crore for the quarter, up ₹1,227 crore YoY
ROCE: around 45% for the quarter, up from ~37% a year earlier
The domestic business sits on net debt of only ~₹600 crore, and consolidated CV operations are net cash positive (~₹1,200 crore).

Operationally:

Wholesale volumes in the CV segment were ~96,800 units, up 12% YoY, with domestic volumes up 9% and exports up 75%. ^[29]
Separate disclosures indicate November 2025 CV volumes around 35,500 units, up ~29% YoY, confirming that the cycle is still strong. ^[30]

Strategic moves:

The company is progressing with its proposed acquisition of Iveco, aiming for closure around April 2026, which would create a much larger global CV platform. ^[31]
CV teams highlight higher‑margin “non‑cyclical” revenue streams and EV initiatives (e‑buses, small electric CVs like the Ace Pro EV) as ways to smooth out classic CV cycle volatility. ^[32]

This is the kind of balance‑sheet and margin profile that makes brokers comfortable slapping higher multiples on a newly listed industrial name.

Analyst View on Tata Motors CV: Broadly Positive

Brokerage sentiment on TMCV is notably more upbeat than on TMPV.

Ambit Institutional Equities just initiated coverage with a “Buy” and a target price of ₹430, implying about 19% upside from the 8 December close near ₹360. ^[33] Ambit’s thesis, in condensed form:
- TMCV holds ~35% CV retail market share, with more than 60% share in the >31‑tonne heavy truck segment.
- Despite earlier volume declines and some market share loss in light commercial vehicles, margins and free cash flow have improved over FY19–25.
- Higher average tonnage, disciplined pricing, non‑core revenue streams and the upcoming IVECO integration support the case for sustained double‑digit EBITDA margins and high ROCE.
The Economic Times stock page lists additional targets from other brokers such as BNP Paribas (Outperform, target ₹830) and ICICI Securities (Add, target ₹775) — numbers that sit well above the current high‑₹370s price. ^[34]

In short, TMCV is being valued as a high‑quality cyclical with global expansion optionality, not as a rescue project.

How the Two Stories Fit Together for Investors

Putting all of this side by side:

Tata Motors Passenger Vehicles (TMPV)

Where it is:
- Trading near 52‑week lows with >50% drawdown in six months. ^[35]
- Hurt by JLR’s cyberattack, China weakness, new luxury taxes and negative FCF guidance. ^[36]
- Facing index‑related selling pressure as it exits the Sensex in late December. ^[37]
What could go right:
- JLR stabilises faster than expected; cyberattack impact fades by Q4 FY26. ^[38]
- China volumes recover and BEV launches close the product‑age gap.
- India PV + EV business continues to grow double‑digits, leaning on Punch EV, Nexon EV, Curvv EV etc. ^[39]
What the Street is saying:
- Several global houses are firmly cautious (Sell/Underperform) with low‑₹300s targets. ^[40]
- Some domestic brokers remain constructive with ADD/Neutral calls and higher targets, and older consensus data still shows headline upside vs current price — but dispersion is huge. ^[41]

Tata Motors CV (TMCV)

Where it is:
- Trading near all‑time highs after listing at a large premium. ^[42]
- Delivering high‑teens EBITDA margins, strong FCF and 40%+ ROCE in Q2. ^[43]
- Benefiting from a strong domestic CV upcycle and robust export growth. ^[44]
What could go right:
- CV cycle stays strong as infrastructure, mining and construction spending remains high. ^[45]
- The IVECO acquisition expands its global footprint and product range. ^[46]
What the Street is saying:
- Coverage is skewed positive (Buy/Outperform/Add), with targets from ₹430 (Ambit) up to ₹775–830 (ICICI, BNP Paribas) — though those long‑term targets will be refined as more standalone history builds up. ^[47]

So you effectively have:

TMPV: high‑volatility, JLR‑linked, EV‑rich, currently beaten‑up stock where sentiment is poor but long‑term optionality is real.
TMCV: cleaner CV pure play with strong margins and balance sheet, and a stock that already reflects a lot of good news.

Key Risks to Keep on the Radar

Whichever side of Tata Motors you’re looking at, some common risk threads run through the story:

Macro & rates: Higher global rates, slower growth or weaker credit availability can hit auto demand across both PV and CV.
China & trade policy: A significant chunk of JLR’s risk now lives in the China luxury market plus tariff/regulatory changes, which are hard to model. ^[48]
EV transition execution: Both PV and CV segments are investing heavily in EVs. Mis‑timed capex, slower adoption or aggressive discounting could compress margins. ^[49]
Post‑demerger valuation gaps: Because historical data is messy, simple ratios like P/E and EV/EBITDA can mislead until a few more quarters of clean standalone numbers are in.

Bottom Line

As of 10 December 2025, “Tata Motors stock” has split into two very different narratives:

Tata Motors Passenger Vehicles (TMPV) is a high‑beta recovery and EV story, currently priced as if JLR’s problems will linger and index flows will hurt.
Tata Motors CV (TMCV) is a margin‑rich cyclical that’s being treated more like a quality industrial with global ambitions.

For investors, the real question isn’t “Is Tata Motors good or bad?” anymore — it’s which side of Tata Motors’ split personality matches your risk appetite and time horizon, and whether you believe JLR’s current mess is a blip or a new normal.