Battle of the EV Charging Standards: Tesla’s NACS vs. CCS2 vs. CHAdeMO – Who Will Rule the Roads in 2025?

Tesla’s Wild October: Record Sales, $1 Trillion Pay Plan, and Q3 Earnings Showdown

  • Stock near highs: Tesla’s stock (NASDAQ: TSLA) is trading around the mid-$440s per share – near its 52-week peak (~$453 on Oct. 6) – after a volatile October run. TSLA is up roughly 80% year-to-date, vastly outperforming the S&P 500’s ~17% gain [1].
  • Record deliveries boost: Tesla delivered 497,099 vehicles in Q3 2025, an all-time quarterly record and about +7.4% year-on-year [2]. This blew past Wall Street’s ~441k forecast by roughly 12% [3]. A late-September rush to beat an expiring $7,500 U.S. EV tax credit fueled the blowout sales [4], “borrowing” demand from future quarters and raising questions about a potential Q4 drop-off.
  • “Affordable” models debut: In early October, Tesla rolled out cheaper “Standard Range” versions of the Model Y and Model 3, trimming features to knock about $4,000–$5,000 off the sticker prices [5]. CEO Elon Musk pitched the move as making Tesla EVs more accessible, but analysts called the price cuts “modest” – “Disappointed” is how Wedbush’s Dan Ives described his reaction [6]. TSLA stock fell ~4% after the Oct. 7–8 announcement amid investor disappointment.
  • Wall Street divided: Analysts remain sharply split on Tesla’s valuation. Top bulls like Wedbush’s Dan Ives maintain $600+ price targets, citing Tesla’s tech and AI prowess [7], and one high-profile investor even proclaimed “Tesla is heading to $900” within a year [8]. But skeptics note Tesla’s thin margins and fierce competition – the average 12-month target is only ~$365 (about 18% below the current price) [9]. Roughly half of analysts rate TSLA Hold or Sell, and some bearish targets go as low as $127 [10].
  • Q3 earnings on tap: Tesla reports Q3 earnings today (Oct. 22) after market close, a key catalyst for the stock. Consensus estimates point to ~$26.3 billion in revenue (+~5% YoY) and around $0.55 EPS (–24% YoY) [11], reflecting the impact of recent price cuts on profit margins. Investors will scrutinize whether Tesla’s record sales translated into healthy profits or if margins were squeezed by all the discounts [12]. Any updated guidance on demand, pricing or new products will be crucial.
  • Musk’s $1 trillion pay plan under fire: Tesla’s governance is in focus as shareholders prepare to vote next month on Elon Musk’s unprecedented $1 trillion compensation package. The controversial plan – potentially the largest CEO pay deal ever – would grant Musk massive stock awards if Tesla hits an $8.5 trillion market cap by 2035 (among other milestones) [13]. Proxy adviser ISS has urged investors to reject the proposal as excessive [14], highlighting the astronomical expectations baked into Tesla’s future valuation.

TSLA Stock Soars Amid Volatile October

Tesla’s stock has been on a rollercoaster this month, climbing toward record highs but with sharp swings along the way. After surging to ~$453 in early October, shares pulled back to the $430s, then rallied again – closing at $442.60 on Oct. 21 [15]. In one recent week, TSLA jumped about 5% in a single day (Oct. 13) amid a market-wide tech rally, then slid ~1.5% the next day as sentiment reversed [16]. Such whipsaw moves have largely mirrored broader market volatility: optimism around cooling inflation and potential Fed rate cuts lifted growth stocks like Tesla [17], while any flare-up in macro risks (for example, U.S.–China trade tensions) quickly dents sentiment [18]. Year-to-date, however, Tesla remains a standout performer – roughly doubling from a year ago and far outpacing the market [19]. This impressive run has swelled Tesla’s market capitalization to around $1.4–$1.5 trillion, prompting debate about how much good news is already “priced in” at these levels [20]. With the stock near all-time highs, investor nerves are evident: options pricing implies an unusually large swing (around 7%) around the earnings release [21], reflecting the tense tug-of-war between Tesla’s bulls and bears heading into the Q3 report.

Record Sales Fuel Growth – But a Demand Hangover?

Underpinning Tesla’s recent strength was its blowout Q3 delivery report. The company delivered 497,099 vehicles globally in the third quarter, smashing its previous record [22]. That figure was far above analyst expectations (by roughly 50,000 units) and about 7.4% higher than the same quarter last year [23]. The surprise surge in sales has been largely attributed to a one-time “pull-forward” effect: thousands of U.S. buyers rushed to purchase Teslas before a $7,500 federal EV tax credit expired on Sept. 30 [24]. Tesla aggressively promoted discounts and financing deals in late Q3 to capitalize on the deadline, effectively borrowing some sales from the future.

Now, the key question is whether Q3’s boom will be followed by a Q4 bust. Many experts caution that the record deliveries were an anomaly driven by expiring incentives. “The $7,500 credit definitely…pulled forward demand this quarter,” observed Ken Mahoney, CEO of Mahoney Asset Management, adding that the incentive’s expiry “could leave a U.S. demand gap in the fourth quarter” [25]. Elliot Johnson, CIO of Evolve ETFs, echoed that skepticism: “I’m skeptical that this will be sustainable and I think we could see a soft couple of quarters,” he said, warning not to assume Tesla’s sales can stay at this lofty level going forward [26]. Even Tesla’s own leadership has braced investors for turbulence – Elon Musk told shareholders back in July that the company faces “a few rough quarters” now that subsidies have waned, before growth from self-driving software and other innovations kicks in [27].

The strong Q3 volume should boost Tesla’s revenue (analysts predict a record ~$26–27 billion for the quarter) [28], but profitability is the big unknown. Tesla cut vehicle prices significantly throughout 2025 to stoke demand, which has put serious pressure on margins. In the second quarter, Tesla’s automotive gross margin had plunged to about 18% (ex-regulatory credits) – down from ~30% a year earlier [29]. It’s likely Q3 margins tightened further given the hefty discounts and incentive-driven sales rush. “Investors will watch if the delivery boom translated into solid revenue and profit, or if margins were squeezed by heavy discounts,” noted one Reuters analysis [30]. In short, Tesla proved it can sell nearly half a million cars in a quarter – now it must show it can do so profitably without the crutch of temporary tax breaks.

On the positive side, Tesla’s blockbuster sales underscore robust underlying demand for its vehicles, and even gave a lift to its non-automotive businesses. The company’s energy division (which sells battery storage and solar systems) also notched a record quarter in Q3, deploying 12.5 GWh of battery capacity – more than in all of 2024 – providing a nice revenue buffer as the auto segment faces pricing headwinds [31]. Tesla’s ability to generate additional revenue streams (like energy storage and software) is part of what bullish investors tout as the company’s long-term strength beyond just car sales. Still, in the near term all eyes are on the core auto margin: the Q3 earnings report will reveal whether Tesla’s aggressive pricing strategy is translating into sustainable profits, or if the company is sacrificing too much margin for volume.

Price Cuts and New Models: Mixed Market Reaction

Beyond the raw delivery numbers, Tesla made headlines this month by unveiling what are essentially more affordable versions of its two most popular models. On October 7, Tesla introduced new “Standard Range” trims for the Model Y crossover and Model 3 sedan in the U.S., followed by similar launches in Europe a few days later [32]. The new variants carry starting prices around $39,990 for the Model Y and $36,990 for the Model 3 – roughly $4,000–$5,000 cheaper than the previous base models [33] [34]. To achieve these lower price points, Tesla trimmed or downgraded features on the Standard Range editions: they come with slightly smaller battery packs (still offering ~320 miles of range), lack certain Autopilot capabilities like “Autosteer,” and have more basic interiors among other cost-saving tweaks [35] [36].

Elon Musk framed the move as a step toward making Tesla ownership possible for more consumers – a baby step toward his oft-stated goal of a true sub-$25K mass-market EV. However, the market’s reaction was lukewarm at best. Many analysts saw the price cuts as relatively minor in the context of Tesla’s ~$40K+ vehicles. “Modest” was the common refrain – “Disappointed” is how Wedbush’s noted Tesla bull Dan Ives described his feelings, noting the new trims are only a few thousand dollars cheaper than before [37]. In other words, simply tweaking pricing on existing models, rather than unveiling an exciting brand-new budget vehicle, did little to impress Wall Street. In fact, Tesla’s stock fell about 4% over the two trading sessions following the announcement [38], as investors digested the news.

Critics argue that Tesla’s pricing strategy is a short-term lever rather than a long-term game-changer. “Basically a lever and not much of a product catalyst,” is how one TechStock² analyst summed it up, suggesting Tesla is goosing demand via discounts rather than introducing something truly revolutionary [39]. The risk is that while these price cuts may help Tesla hit delivery targets (as evidenced by the Q3 bump), they could also erode profit per vehicle and only create one-off spurts in demand. Even many Tesla bulls concede that to keep growing in the coming years, Tesla will eventually need a truly mass-market model (sub-$30K) – essentially a new, cheaper vehicle – to fend off emerging low-cost rivals. Musk has hinted such a model is in development (often dubbed the “next-generation” platform), but no concrete details or timeline have been revealed yet. Until then, Tesla’s approach is to trade a bit of short-term margin for longer-term volume growth – a tactic summed up by one strategist who said Tesla is “trading short-term margin for long-term … scale” with these moves [40].

EV Competition Heats Up

Tesla may be the world’s best-known EV maker, but it’s far from alone – and the competition is getting fiercer by the day. In the U.S. and Europe, virtually every major automaker (and plenty of startups) are launching new electric models, often priced aggressively or paired with hefty incentives. This wave of new entrants is chipping away at Tesla’s market share, especially in regions where rivals have certain advantages in price or local taste. For instance, in Europe Tesla’s sales dropped about 22% year-over-year in August, shrinking its share of that continent’s booming EV market to roughly 1.5% [41]. Established European brands like Volkswagen, BMW, and Stellantis (Peugeot, Fiat, etc.) – not to mention Chinese newcomers – have been gaining ground by offering a wider range of electric models (including smaller, affordable ones and popular plug-in hybrids) that target segments Tesla doesn’t yet play in. Even in markets where Tesla has been strong, changes are afoot: Norway, one of Tesla’s early strongholds, is phasing out its generous EV tax breaks over the next two years, which will effectively raise Tesla’s prices there and could dent demand [42].

The most formidable challenger is emerging in China, the world’s largest EV market. China’s BYD, which sells both pure electrics and plug-in hybrids, now routinely outsells Tesla in China – and even globally in total EV sales [43]. (Notably, BYD just logged its first quarterly sales dip since 2020, but it continues to expand internationally at a rapid clip [44].) Tesla has a strong foothold in China with its Shanghai Gigafactory, and its sales in China ticked up ~2.8% in September thanks in part to a new six-seat Model Y “L” variant tailored to Chinese buyers [45]. Still, the takeaway is clear: while EV demand worldwide is surging (a record 2.1 million electrified vehicles were sold globally in September, +26% YoY) [46], Tesla cannot rely on a rising tide alone to carry it. The company faces an onslaught of competitors at every price point and in every major region, all aiming to capture a piece of the fast-growing EV pie. This intensifying competition puts pressure on Tesla to keep innovating – whether through lower-priced models, new features (like better self-driving tech), or other differentiators – in order to maintain its lead. It also partly explains Tesla’s willingness to slash prices; as legacy automakers and startups cut into Tesla’s once-dominant EV share, Tesla has been using its healthy margins to fight a price war and stay ahead of the pack. As one analyst put it, traditional carmakers trade at tiny fractions of Tesla’s valuation per car sold – so Tesla must keep growing at a rapid clip to eventually “earn into” its massive market cap [47]. The race is on, and the EV arms race will only intensify heading into 2026.

Safety Probes and Other Wild Cards

Being the industry frontrunner means Tesla draws outsized scrutiny – and not all headlines have been positive. In the past weeks, regulatory and legal issues have resurfaced as potential wild cards for Tesla. Notably, U.S. auto safety regulators opened a new investigation into Tesla’s Full Self-Driving (FSD) software earlier this month, following reports of Tesla vehicles potentially not stopping for red lights. The probe covers about 2.9 million Tesla cars – essentially all with the FSD beta software – and is the latest in a string of safety inquiries into Tesla’s advanced driver assistance systems [48]. When news of the FSD investigation broke on Oct. 9, Tesla’s stock immediately slid ~2% intraday [49], a reminder that any negative headlines around Autopilot/FSD or recalls can quickly spook investors. As one analysis noted, “Regulatory and legal issues (from Autopilot safety to CEO Elon Musk’s antics) remain wild cards for the stock.” [50] In other words, beyond the company’s financial metrics, Tesla’s public image and relationship with regulators can have a real impact on shareholder confidence. Musk’s own behavior – from combative social media posts to high-profile court cases – often garners attention that can overshadow Tesla’s business narrative. These factors are hard to predict, but they add another layer of risk that investors keep in mind when valuing Tesla’s lofty future prospects.

Geopolitics also looms in the background. Tesla, unlike most U.S. automakers, generates a large chunk of its revenue overseas (especially in China and Europe), and it operates major factories in both the U.S. and China. This makes the company sensitive to global trade policy and diplomatic relations. Any flare-up in U.S.–China trade tensions, new tariffs, or protectionist policies can directly or indirectly affect Tesla. For instance, late last week the U.S. government announced new measures to support domestic EV production (a positive for Tesla’s American plants) but also unveiled a 25% tariff on imported trucks starting Nov. 1 [51]. Tesla likely won’t be directly hurt by a truck tariff – its long-awaited Cybertruck will be built in Texas, and it doesn’t import vehicles from abroad to the U.S. – but the news underscores that government policy in the auto sector remains a wildcard. In China, Tesla has benefited from supportive EV policies in the past, but rising U.S.–China tech friction could pose challenges, whether through supply chain constraints or consumer sentiment. In short, Tesla must execute nearly flawlessly not just in the marketplace against rivals, but also in navigating regulatory scrutiny and geopolitical hurdles, to justify its rich valuation going forward [52].

Musk’s $1 Trillion Pay Package Under Scrutiny

Another subplot weighing on Tesla’s outlook is a corporate governance storm brewing around Elon Musk’s compensation. Tesla’s board has proposed an eye-popping new pay package for its CEO – valued up to $1 trillion – that will go to a shareholder vote in November. If approved, it would dwarf any executive compensation plan in history. The award is tied to an almost unthinkably ambitious goal: Musk would only reap the full payout if Tesla achieves a market capitalization of $8.5 trillion by 2035 (along with other performance targets) [53]. For context, $8.5 trillion is several times larger than the current most valuable company in the world. Reaching that would require Tesla to grow into a behemoth far beyond any company today – underscoring just how sky-high some expectations are for Tesla’s future.

The reaction to this plan has been mixed, to put it mildly. Just days ago, influential proxy advisory firm ISS (Institutional Shareholder Services) came out strongly against Musk’s proposed pay deal, calling it “excessive” and urging Tesla’s investors to vote “No.” [54] ISS and other critics argue the package is far too rich and dilutive (it could grant Musk roughly a 12% additional stake if fully earned [55]), especially given Musk’s existing wealth tied to Tesla’s stock. They also point out that rewarding Musk for hitting an $8.5T market cap might encourage a focus on stock price over sustainable execution. On the other hand, Tesla’s board and Musk’s defenders say the record-breaking compensation is justified to keep Musk focused on Tesla’s long-term growth – essentially aligning his incentives with making Tesla one of the most valuable companies in history [56] [57]. Some analysts note that if anyone can chase such bold targets, it’s Musk, who famously eschews modest goals.

Regardless of one’s view, the sheer scale of the proposed pay plan has drawn fresh attention to Tesla’s governance and the nearly mythic expectations around the company. An $8.5 trillion valuation implies Tesla would be worth more than Apple, Saudi Aramco, and Microsoft combined at today’s sizes. Even many Tesla bulls find that hard to fathom. The upcoming shareholder vote will be closely watched as a barometer of investor confidence: Will Tesla’s investors rubber-stamp Musk’s mega-pay package, effectively signaling faith in an almost trillionaire vision of Tesla’s future? Or will they push back, suggesting some concern that expectations have become unrealistically high? The outcome won’t directly impact Tesla’s operations, but it will contribute to the narrative surrounding the company – highlighting either continued exuberance or a desire for more caution at the top. In the meantime, the debate over Musk’s pay adds yet another layer of intrigue to Tesla’s story heading into year-end.

Wall Street: Bulls vs. Bears in Stark Contrast

Perhaps no stock divides Wall Street quite like Tesla. As the company hurtles between milestones and challenges, analysts and investors have painted widely divergent visions of its future. On one end, the Tesla bulls argue that the company is not just another automaker but a generational technology powerhouse – an amalgam of cutting-edge cars, renewable energy, software, and robotics. These optimists believe Tesla should be valued more like a high-growth tech firm than a car company. For example, Morgan Stanley recently reiterated an Overweight rating with a $410 price target (slightly below current levels but bullish in context), Piper Sandler upped its target to $500, and longtime Tesla cheerleader Dan Ives of Wedbush still sees $600 as fair value [58]. Some uber-bulls go even further: tech investor Tom Nash of TIGER 21 boldly proclaimed “Tesla is heading to $900” within a year [59], betting on a continued wave of robotaxi and AI-driven excitement to propel the stock. Proponents of the bull case cite Tesla’s leadership in EV technology, its expanding energy storage business, and potential future windfalls from software (self-driving capabilities, subscriptions, even humanoid robots) to justify the lofty valuation [60]. “If the software works, [a] Tesla robotaxi could drive any road in the world,” notes Morningstar analyst Seth Goldstein, underscoring the huge “AI/automation premium” baked into Tesla’s stock price [61]. In essence, bulls see Tesla as uniquely positioned at the crossroads of autos, energy, and high-tech – a combo that could deliver tremendous earnings growth for years to come.

On the flip side are the Tesla bears and skeptics, who look at the same company and see a very different risk-reward profile. Despite Tesla’s achievements, doubters emphasize its sky-high valuation and more uncertain near-term outlook. Even after this year’s rally, the average 12-month analyst price target for TSLA is only around $364, which is below the current trading price [62]. In fact, about half of all analysts covering Tesla rate the stock a Hold or Sell. Some have extremely bearish targets: for instance, HSBC’s analyst team earlier put a rare “Reduce” rating with a price target of just $127 [63] – implying they think Tesla could be worth 70% less than today. That may be an outlier, but it reflects a view that Tesla’s stock has run far ahead of fundamentals. The bears argue that Tesla’s valuation already assumes flawless execution and massive growth; any stumble – be it weaker demand, further margin erosion, or delays in new products like the Cybertruck – could trigger a sharp correction. They also point out that legacy automakers (like GM, Ford, Toyota) trade at tiny multiples of earnings and sales compared to Tesla. By conventional metrics, Tesla’s stock (near 100× earnings on a forward basis) looks extremely expensive – so the company must deliver breakneck growth for many years to “grow into” that valuation [64] [65]. Essentially, pessimists see Tesla as a great car company but not one that can defy economic gravity forever.

Even some long-term Tesla bulls acknowledge that risks lie ahead. With the easy boost from U.S. tax credits now in the rearview mirror, Tesla needs new demand drivers to avoid a deceleration. “[Tesla’s] main challenge is to manage a post-credit slowdown – that’s where a new, more affordable model becomes crucial to keeping momentum going,” observes Matt Britzman of Hargreaves Lansdown [66], stressing the importance of Tesla expanding its lineup to sustain growth. In short, whether Tesla’s current stock price is justified or not depends on who you ask. Optimists see visionary products on the horizon (from self-driving robotaxis to AI robots) that could transform entire industries. Pessimists see intensifying competition, slimmer profits, and remind that no tree grows to the sky. Until either the bulls or bears are proven definitively right, we can expect Tesla’s share price to remain highly sensitive to every data point – from quarterly delivery numbers and earnings results to news of new models, technological breakthroughs, or regulatory hiccups [67]. As one market strategist remarked, Tesla’s stock right now is “on edge” – with the bull and bear cases both tightly wound around each new development [68].

Q3 Earnings Showdown: Big Test for Tesla’s Momentum

All of these narratives will collide when Tesla reports its third-quarter earnings after the closing bell on Oct. 22. This earnings release is shaping up to be one of Tesla’s most anticipated in recent memory, as it could either validate the bulls’ optimism or bolster the bears’ concerns. Wall Street consensus expects Tesla’s revenue to rise modestly to about $26–27 billion (a ~5% YoY increase, thanks largely to those record deliveries) and earnings around $0.55 per share, which would mark roughly a 20–25% decline from the $0.72 a year ago [69]. That profit slide reflects how vehicle price cuts and cost inflation have weighed on Tesla’s margins. However, expectations have been tempered so much that there’s room for upside surprise – some analysts think Tesla might beat the low bar. For instance, Wells Fargo has suggested Tesla could top the consensus EPS despite the margin pressure [70], and independent Tesla watchers like Troy Teslike are forecasting a sizable beat (he models ~$0.65–0.66 EPS vs ~$0.55 street estimate) [71]. Any indication that Tesla managed to maintain respectable profitability in Q3 – whether through cost efficiencies, higher-than-expected software revenue, or other means – could reinforce the bull case and send the stock higher. Conversely, if the results show that Tesla’s aggressive discounting undercut its margins more than anticipated, it would validate some of the bearish warnings and likely trigger a pullback [72].

Beyond the headline numbers, Tesla’s management commentary and guidance will be crucial. Elon Musk and his team will host a conference call shortly after the earnings release, and analysts will be listening intently for clues about the road ahead. Key questions include: Can Tesla maintain its delivery momentum now that the U.S. tax credit boost is gone? How is demand holding up in China and Europe, especially with economic uncertainties and many new EV rivals launching? Will profit margins start to rebound in Q4 now that the frantic Q3 sales push (and heavy discounts) are over – or are further price tweaks coming if sales slow? Any updates on upcoming products will also be market-moving: investors will want to hear about the production ramp of the long-delayed Cybertruck, progress on the next-gen low-cost model, and Tesla’s advances in self-driving technology and AI (including the promised “robotaxi” network). Musk’s tone on macroeconomic factors, like interest rates and consumer financing, could be another talking point, since high borrowing costs have been a headwind for auto sales (though there’s optimism rate relief could be on the horizon) [73].

One more subplot: as noted, Tesla’s shareholder vote on Musk’s pay is coming in a few weeks. While not directly related to the earnings, any discussion of it (or shareholder questions about it) could be interesting on the call. At the very least, it serves as a reminder of the sky-high goals Tesla is shooting for in the long run. Musk may well use the earnings platform to double down on his vision for Tesla – from achieving full autonomy to deploying optimus robots – to justify the company’s bold trajectory (and by extension, his pay package).

Ultimately, this Q3 report is seen as a pivotal moment that could set the tone for Tesla’s stock into the end of 2025. The company has tremendous momentum – record sales, new products, and a stock near highs – but also enormous challenges with margin pressure, rising competition, and scrutiny on multiple fronts. “It’s put-up or shut-up time – we know the top-line sales were great, now we need to see the bottom-line,” quipped one senior analyst ahead of the results [74] [75]. Indeed, Tesla’s ability to convert its surging growth into solid profit will be the key narrative investors take away. If Tesla can thread that needle, it could silence some doubters and keep the rally going. If not, the stock’s recent wild ride might take another sharp turn. As always with Tesla, expectations are high and the stakes even higher. All eyes are on Oct. 22’s earnings – the outcome will likely influence not just Tesla’s share price, but the broader conversation about whether this EV pioneer can live up to its colossal hype. In the meantime, investors should buckle up for more twists and turns. Few companies attract as much attention – or move as sharply on news – as Tesla. And as one analyst wryly noted, until Tesla’s booming deliveries clearly translate into booming profits, “the swings are likely to continue” [76]. In other words, the Tesla rollercoaster isn’t slowing down any time soon, and the next big loop on the track is straight ahead.

Sources: Key information and quotes were drawn from recent analyses by TechStock² (ts2.tech) and reporting from Reuters, Investing.com and other financial outlets, providing a comprehensive view of Tesla’s stock performance, business updates and expert outlook as of Oct. 22, 2025 [77] [78] [79] [80] [81].

Tesla: Why Morningstar analyst Seth Goldstein has a sell rating on the stock

References

1. ts2.tech, 2. ts2.tech, 3. ts2.tech, 4. ts2.tech, 5. ts2.tech, 6. ts2.tech, 7. ts2.tech, 8. ts2.tech, 9. ts2.tech, 10. ts2.tech, 11. ts2.tech, 12. ts2.tech, 13. ts2.tech, 14. ts2.tech, 15. ts2.tech, 16. ts2.tech, 17. ts2.tech, 18. ts2.tech, 19. ts2.tech, 20. ts2.tech, 21. ts2.tech, 22. ts2.tech, 23. ts2.tech, 24. ts2.tech, 25. www.reuters.com, 26. ts2.tech, 27. ts2.tech, 28. ts2.tech, 29. ts2.tech, 30. ts2.tech, 31. ts2.tech, 32. ts2.tech, 33. ts2.tech, 34. ts2.tech, 35. ts2.tech, 36. ts2.tech, 37. ts2.tech, 38. ts2.tech, 39. ts2.tech, 40. ts2.tech, 41. ts2.tech, 42. ts2.tech, 43. ts2.tech, 44. ts2.tech, 45. ts2.tech, 46. ts2.tech, 47. ts2.tech, 48. ts2.tech, 49. ts2.tech, 50. ts2.tech, 51. ts2.tech, 52. ts2.tech, 53. ts2.tech, 54. ts2.tech, 55. ts2.tech, 56. www.reuters.com, 57. www.reuters.com, 58. ts2.tech, 59. ts2.tech, 60. ts2.tech, 61. ts2.tech, 62. ts2.tech, 63. ts2.tech, 64. ts2.tech, 65. ts2.tech, 66. ts2.tech, 67. ts2.tech, 68. ts2.tech, 69. ts2.tech, 70. ts2.tech, 71. ts2.tech, 72. ts2.tech, 73. ts2.tech, 74. ts2.tech, 75. ts2.tech, 76. ts2.tech, 77. ts2.tech, 78. ts2.tech, 79. ts2.tech, 80. ts2.tech, 81. ts2.tech

Transocean (RIG) Stock Comeback: Insider Buys, New Deals Spark Rally Amid Oil Sector Rebound
Previous Story

Transocean (RIG) Stock Soars on Insider’s $12M Bet and New Deals Amid Oil Sector Revival

SoFi’s Roller-Coaster Rally: Fintech Stock Soars 230% in 2025 – What’s Next for SOFI?
Next Story

SoFi Stock Skyrockets 230% in 2025 as Earnings Loom – $1.6 Trillion Opportunity Sparks Frenzy

Stock Market Today

  • The Smartest Retail Stock to Buy With $1,000 Right Now: Amazon Valuation Signals
    October 22, 2025, 8:10 PM EDT. Amazon (AMZN) remains a retail heavyweight even as it trails broader indices this year. With a $2.3 trillion market cap, it dominates the SPDR S&P Retail ETF and dwarfs peers like Walmart. The stock's forward P/E of 34x for the next 12 months is the cheapest in a decade, while its gross margin of 49.6% over the past year puts it in the 100th percentile for profitability. Despite a 1.3% YTD gain, 66 of 68 analysts rate it a buy/strong buy, with a mean target about 20% above current levels. For investors with $1,000 to deploy, the case is a rare valuation entry point offering dominant market share, strong profitability, and favorable multiples.
  • Churchill Downs Q3 Profit Drops, Yet Beats Estimates
    October 22, 2025, 8:08 PM EDT. Churchill Downs Inc. (CHDN) reported Q3 results showing a profit decline year over year but beat estimates on an adjusted basis. GAAP earnings were $38.10 million and $0.54 per share (vs $65.40 million and $0.86 a year earlier). Excluding items, adjusted earnings totaled $77.10 million ($1.09 per share) vs. analysts' expecting $0.98. Revenue increased 8.7% to $683.00 million from $628.50 million. The results underscore a dual story: top-line growth and a softer GAAP bottom line, with the adjusted figure showing resilience against non-recurring items.
  • Lawsuit Claims Melania Trump, Javier Milei Used as Props in Libra and MELANIA Meme Coin Scheme
    October 22, 2025, 7:52 PM EDT. New class-action in Hurlock v. Kelsier Ventures alleges that Meteora founder Benjamin Chow orchestrated a 'pump-and-dump' scheme across at least 15 tokens, with five detailed in the filing, including the high-profile MELANIA and LIBRA meme coins. Plaintiffs say the public figures Melania Trump and Javier Milei were used as credibility props rather than culpable actors, while Chow, assisted by Ng Ming Yeow and the Davis family through Kelsier Ventures, built the operation on an identical blueprint. The lawsuit claims the tokens surged on launch and collapsed afterward, citing on-chain links from Bubblemaps between wallets tied to MELANIA and LIBRA. The case underscores alleged coordination between an automated market maker backend and the promoters, arguing the real fraud was centered on Chow's network, not the public faces.
  • Is Eli Lilly's Obesity Drug Breakthrough Driving a Fair Stock Price in 2025?
    October 22, 2025, 7:50 PM EDT. Investors have watched Eli Lilly ride a volatile path as breakthroughs in obesity and diabetes treatments-especially tirzepatide-reshape growth expectations. After years of outsized gains, the stock's valuation remains debated: a 2/6 score on traditional checks and a narrative that cash flows could justify a premium. Using a Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) framework, analysts project free cash flow rising to multi-billion levels, landing a projected fair value around $1,169 per share and signaling the stock may be undervalued by roughly 30% today. Yet critics warn that growth prospects hinge on sustained drug adoption and pricing, keeping the fair price contested. In short, while the breakout fuels upside, the fair price in 2025 depends on how assumptions about cash flows and competitive dynamics materialize.
  • Helix Energy Solutions Q3 Earnings Decline, Misses Estimates
    October 22, 2025, 7:42 PM EDT. Helix Energy Solutions (HLX) posted Q3 earnings of $22.08 million, or $0.15 per share, down from $29.51 million and $0.19 per share a year ago. Analysts had expected $0.17 per share in Q3 (excluding items). Revenue rose to $376.96 million from $342.41 million, a 10.1% year-over-year increase. The result shows a decline in bottom-line profitability despite higher top-line sales. The company beat revenue consensus but fell short of EPS estimates, signaling mixed quarterly performance. Investors will watch for further details on segment performance and actions to boost efficiency. All figures GAAP; the press notes remind that results reflect typical adjustments and that views here are author's and not Nasdaq's.
Go toTop