Dec. 23, 2025 — Tesla, Inc. stock (NASDAQ: TSLA) is ending 2025 with a familiar mix of adrenaline and argument: the share price is flirting with the psychologically loud $500 level, while Wall Street is simultaneously trimming near-term vehicle delivery expectations. The tension isn’t subtle. Bulls are paying for a future shaped by robotaxis, AI, and humanoid robots. Bears are pointing at slowing EV demand, intensifying competition (especially in Europe), and rising regulatory scrutiny around driver-assistance branding.
On Monday, TSLA touched an intraday record just under $500 and then pulled back to close below it, keeping the “will it print $500?” drama alive into the holiday-shortened stretch. [1]
Below is what’s driving Tesla stock today, the major forecasts hitting tape on 23.12.2025, and the catalysts likely to decide whether $500 becomes a new floor—or a ceiling.
Tesla stock price today: why $500 matters to traders and long-term investors
Tesla stock has repeatedly shown that round-number levels become magnets: they attract momentum buyers, trigger profit-taking, and concentrate options positioning. That dynamic is playing out again as shares hover within striking distance of $500. On Monday, TSLA hit $498.83 intraday before closing at $488.73 (up about 1.6% on the day). [2]
The bigger story is that the market is treating Tesla less like a carmaker and more like an “autonomy + robotics” platform—while still using quarterly deliveries as a reality check. Reuters has described how much of Tesla’s valuation is tied to optimism around self-driving and humanoid robotics, even though most current revenue and profit still come from EV sales. [3]
The December 23 narrative: Tesla’s robotaxi story keeps getting louder
1) Driverless robotaxi testing is progressing—and markets care
Tesla’s autonomy narrative accelerated after Elon Musk said the company was testing robotaxis without a safety monitor in the front passenger seat, a milestone that helped push shares to their highest level in nearly a year at the time. [4]
A key point for investors: Tesla doesn’t need full, nationwide commercial autonomy tomorrow for the stock to move today. The stock often responds to signs of operational expansion—more cities, more miles, fewer interventions—because investors model robotaxis as a high-margin, software-like business.
Even critics acknowledge the stakes: if Tesla can scale autonomy safely, it can unlock recurring revenue (rides, subscriptions, fleet utilization). If it can’t, the stock’s current multiple becomes harder to defend.
2) Waymo’s San Francisco outage became an “autonomy moment” for TSLA
One oddly symbolic spark in this week’s coverage: a San Francisco power outage led to incidents where Waymo robotaxis stalled, prompting California regulators to examine what happened. Waymo paused service that evening after a fire at a PG&E substation cut power to roughly a third of the city, affecting about 130,000 residents. [5]
Market coverage on Dec. 23 connected that outage to Tesla’s push toward $500—less because the outage “changed Tesla fundamentals,” and more because it reinforced how real-world edge cases can shape the autonomy race in the public imagination. [6]
The other half of the story: analysts are cutting Tesla Q4 delivery forecasts
Robotaxi excitement doesn’t erase the quarterly scoreboard. And on Dec. 23, that scoreboard got a little harsher.
New Street Research and UBS: below-consensus delivery expectations
Investing-focused coverage published today says multiple analysts expect Tesla’s Q4 2025 deliveries to come in below consensus:
- New Street Research:415,000 to 435,000 deliveries (vs. consensus around ~440,000), citing “pull-forwards” into Q3 ahead of U.S. subsidy expiration at the end of September. [7]
- UBS (Joseph Spak):415,000 deliveries, with the view that the U.S. is the main weakness after the end of the $7,500 consumer EV tax credit; UBS flagged the possibility of sharply lower U.S. sales quarter-over-quarter. [8]
The market’s immediate problem isn’t just “a miss.” It’s what a miss implies about pricing power, mix, and margins—especially in the U.S., where incentives recently did a lot of heavy lifting.
Deutsche Bank goes even lower—and ties valuation support to robotaxis
Deutsche Bank analyst Edison Yu has projected ~405,000 Q4 deliveries (a level that implies a significant year-over-year decline), while still arguing that optimism around robotaxis supports a bullish longer-term view. Yu also modeled automotive gross margin (ex-credits) at 14.4%, down sequentially, largely due to fixed-cost absorption pressure from lower volume. [9]
Notably, the same note raised Deutsche Bank’s price target to $500—a neat encapsulation of 2025’s Tesla debate: near-term delivery and margin pressure, but higher long-term multiples if robotaxis and humanoids become real businesses. [10]
The next date that matters: January 2 delivery report
UBS-linked coverage expects Tesla to report Q4 delivery figures on January 2. That report is now positioned as a “fork in the narrative”: will the market punish a delivery miss, or continue to look through it toward robotaxi/Optimus milestones? [11]
Cathie Wood trims Tesla again—without abandoning the bull case
Another headline in today’s Tesla stock news cycle: ARK Invest’s Cathie Wood sold roughly 60,715 shares (estimated at about $29.7 million) while TSLA was making fresh highs. [12]
Importantly, this was framed as portfolio management, not a thesis reversal. Coverage notes Tesla remains ARK’s largest holding, while Wood continues to argue that Tesla’s autonomy future is central to her long-term outlook. [13]
For TSLA watchers, ARK selling into strength often gets interpreted two ways:
- Bulls: “Even the biggest Tesla bull is taking responsible profits—healthy.”
- Bears: “If upside is so obvious, why sell at all?”
In reality, it’s mostly mechanics: ARK runs funds with position-size constraints and volatility management needs.
Europe update: Tesla registrations fall as BYD surges
On Dec. 23, Reuters published fresh ACEA data showing Europe’s new car sales rose year-over-year in November for a fifth month, supported by EV registrations in markets including Germany, Italy, and Spain. Battery-electric registrations reached 21% market share in the EU, 26% in the UK, and 98% in Norway. [14]
But Tesla’s regional picture was weaker:
- Tesla registrations fell 11.8% year-over-year in the EU+UK+EFTA area in November, according to the same Reuters report, with record Norway sales offsetting losses elsewhere. [15]
- BYD registrations surged 221.8% in that dataset, with Tesla and BYD each around ~2% market share for the month. [16]
This matters for TSLA stock because Europe has been one of the key battlegrounds where Tesla is no longer the default aspirational EV choice. If the region’s EV share rises while Tesla declines, investors start asking whether Tesla’s brand and product cadence are keeping up.
Reuters also noted Europe’s policy environment is shifting: the European Commission made public a plan to abandon what had effectively been a 2035 combustion-engine ban, described as a major retreat from prior green policy direction after auto-sector pressure. [17]
That policy uncertainty complicates demand forecasting—both for incumbents and for Tesla.
Regulatory risk stays in the frame: California’s Autopilot dispute
Tesla’s autonomy story is a valuation engine—but it’s also a regulatory magnet.
Reuters reported that California’s DMV deferred an order that would have suspended Tesla’s licenses for 30 days, placing the order on hold while giving Tesla time to remedy alleged misleading marketing around “Autopilot.” The DMV stayed the sales-license suspension for 90 days and the manufacturing-license suspension indefinitely, according to Reuters. [18]
To avoid the suspension, the DMV said Tesla could submit a statement confirming it has stopped using the name Autopilot—or confirming the cars can operate without active human monitoring. Tesla responded that sales in California would continue uninterrupted. [19]
For TSLA investors, this is a live wire:
- The robotaxi thesis depends not only on technical progress, but also on regulatory acceptance and consumer trust.
- Branding and disclosure disputes can become shorthand for broader safety and oversight concerns, especially if Tesla pushes further into unsupervised operation.
Tesla’s energy business keeps quietly stacking real-world wins
While most Tesla stock headlines revolve around robotaxis, Tesla’s energy and storage division keeps landing tangible projects—often with fewer philosophical wars attached.
Matrix Renewables + Tesla: a 500 MW / 1 GWh BESS project in the UK
Matrix Renewables announced it signed a full EPC (engineering, procurement, construction) agreement with Tesla to design, build, and commission a 500 MW / 2-hour (1 GWh) standalone battery energy storage system in Eccles, Scotland. Matrix said the project has full consent to begin construction and is positioned along key transmission corridors between Scotland and England. [20]
Coverage in the renewables trade press similarly described Tesla as responsible for delivering the two-hour BESS and emphasized the project’s grid-flexibility role. [21]
Tesla’s European storage footprint is expanding
Separate reporting notes Tesla-related storage deployment in Europe is broadening, including agreements to deploy Megapack technology across multiple projects. [22]
For TSLA valuation models, energy is often treated as the “nice-to-have cousin” of autonomy. But in a world where grid constraints and renewable intermittency are front-page issues, large-scale storage projects add a layer of fundamental, cash-flow-oriented credibility to Tesla’s story.
Analyst price targets: Tesla bulls and bears are living in different universes
If you want a one-paragraph summary of Tesla stock in late 2025, it’s this: the same company supports radically different price targets because analysts disagree on one core question—how much of Tesla’s future autonomy and robotics should be priced in today?
The bear case: UBS sticks to Sell with a $247 target
UBS reiterated a Sell rating with a $247 price target while also cutting its Q4 delivery forecast to 415,000 units, arguing the stock is far above UBS’s view of fair value. [23]
The “still bullish, but deliveries are soft” case: Canaccord
Canaccord boosted its price target to $551 while trimming its Q4 delivery estimate to roughly 427,000 vehicles, framing the slowdown as temporary rather than structural. [24]
The “robotaxi supports the multiple” case: Deutsche Bank at $500
Deutsche Bank’s delivery forecast (around 405,000) is among the more cautious—but the price target moved up to $500, explicitly crediting higher valuation multiples tied to robotaxi and humanoid initiatives. [25]
The super-bull framing: Wedbush and ARK’s big numbers
Market coverage today highlighted Wedbush analyst Dan Ives maintaining a $600 price target and projecting a multi-city robotaxi rollout into 2026, while ARK’s Cathie Wood reiterated a long-term target of $2,600 by 2029. [26]
The spread here isn’t a normal disagreement. It’s a referendum on whether Tesla is:
- primarily a car company with optionality, or
- primarily an autonomy/robotics platform temporarily financed by car sales.
What could move TSLA next: the short list of catalysts (and landmines)
1) Q4 deliveries on Jan. 2
A print around the 405k–435k range (as outlined by Deutsche Bank, UBS, and New Street) will force the market to decide whether it still cares about automotive volume in the near term. [27]
2) Evidence of robotaxi scale (not just tests)
Investors will look for:
- expansion beyond Austin
- reduced interventions
- improved safety disclosures and regulatory alignment
The stock tends to reward credible scaling signals far more than another futuristic promise.
3) Europe: competition and policy volatility
Tesla’s Europe numbers are now being read against a backdrop where:
- the overall EV market share is rising, and
- Chinese players like BYD are growing quickly, and
- policy direction (like the 2035 ICE ban debate) is in flux. [28]
4) Regulatory outcomes in California
The DMV dispute isn’t just a local licensing story; it’s a proxy battle over how autonomy is marketed and understood—exactly the terrain where robotaxi narratives can either become mainstream or become legally constrained. [29]
5) Energy storage wins that translate into margins
Large projects like the Scotland BESS contract help reinforce Tesla as a multi-business company—not just a sentiment engine. [30]
Bottom line: Tesla stock is priced for a future that’s arriving in pieces
As of Dec. 23, 2025, Tesla stock is behaving like a market referendum on autonomy. The share price is near $500 because investors are leaning into the idea that the next Tesla earnings call won’t be won or lost on gross margin basis points—it’ll be won or lost on whether robotaxis and robotics keep moving from “demo” to “deployment.” [31]
But the delivery cuts are the reminder that gravity still exists. Even if Tesla becomes a software-like autonomy platform someday, it still has to sell cars profitably today—and the U.S. post-incentive hangover plus Europe competition is making that harder. [32]
References
1. www.barrons.com, 2. www.barrons.com, 3. www.reuters.com, 4. www.reuters.com, 5. www.reuters.com, 6. www.barrons.com, 7. www.investing.com, 8. www.investing.com, 9. www.investing.com, 10. www.investing.com, 11. www.investing.com, 12. www.investors.com, 13. www.investors.com, 14. www.reuters.com, 15. www.reuters.com, 16. www.reuters.com, 17. www.reuters.com, 18. www.reuters.com, 19. www.reuters.com, 20. www.prnewswire.com, 21. renewablesnow.com, 22. www.pv-magazine.com, 23. www.investing.com, 24. stocktwits.com, 25. www.investing.com, 26. www.barrons.com, 27. www.investing.com, 28. www.reuters.com, 29. www.reuters.com, 30. www.prnewswire.com, 31. www.barrons.com, 32. www.investing.com
