NEW YORK, July 30, 2026, 15:04 EDT
- Plug Power gained 7.9%, snapping a six-session decline.
- Shares of Bloom Energy and FuelCell Energy rose over 25%.
- Plug regained just 40.5% of its previous dollar loss.
Shares of Plug Power Inc. NASDAQ:PLUG climbed 7.9% to $2.05 during Thursday afternoon trading, with U.S. markets still open. This uptick came after the stock posted six consecutive declines.
The surge in fuel-cell stocks occurred at the same time. Bloom Energy Corp. NYSE:BE posted record-high revenue and operating cash flow, leading Mizuho to upgrade the stock.
The key point for investors is more specific. While the sector buzz reached Plug, demonstrated operational results are still largely with Bloom. Plug’s revealed tie-up with Stream Data Centers covers asset disposals and initial discussions about potential upcoming product installations.
Intraday prices most recently available indicated a significant range in performance.
| Security | Price | Day move | Market value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Plug Power Inc. NASDAQ:PLUG | $2.05 | up 7.9% | $2.85 billion |
| Bloom Energy Corp. NYSE:BE | $205.57 | up 25.5% | $66.47 billion |
| FuelCell Energy Inc. NASDAQ:FCEL | $23.23 | up 28.5% | $1.26 billion |
| Ballard Power Systems Inc. NASDAQ:BLDP | $2.72 | up 8.8% | $814 million |
| Invesco QQQ Trust NASDAQ:QQQ | $682.15 | gained 3.1% | — |
Bloom exceeded Plug by 17.6 percentage points, while FuelCell was ahead by 20.6 points. The sector rallied, though the gains were uneven.
Plug regained less than half of its previous decline during the rebound. The figures are based on closing prices from July 21 and July 29.
| Plug share price indicator | Value | Movement |
|---|---|---|
| Close on July 21 | $2.27 | Reference |
| Close on July 29 | $1.90 | −16.3% |
| July 30 trading session | $2.05 | +7.9% on the session |
| Unrecovered difference from July 21 | $0.22 | −9.7% |
| Portion of lost value regained | $0.15 out of $0.37 | 40.5% |
Thursday’s advance was moderated by the arithmetic. Plug still traded 9.7% beneath its July 21 close. The stock had lost 37 cents per share across six sessions.
Bloom reported second-quarter revenue of $1.065 billion, representing a 165.5% increase. The company recorded a GAAP gross margin of 33.4%, with operating cash flow totaling $226.4 million. Chief Executive KR Sridhar stated, “Bloom is now a standard for AI onsite power.” Bloom Energy
Mizuho has raised its rating on Bloom from Neutral to Outperform, assigning a price target of $242, lower than its earlier estimate of $285. The brokerage pointed to Bloom’s “time-to-power advantage” and financing capacity exceeding $27 billion as reasons for the upgrade. Investing.com
The most recent quarterly results highlight the financial disparity. Plug reports data for the first quarter, while Bloom provides results for the second quarter, and the companies have distinct business structures.
| Operating comparison | Plug Q1 2026 | Bloom Q2 2026 |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $163.5 million | $1.065 billion |
| Year-over-year revenue growth | 22.0% | 165.5% |
| GAAP gross margin | −13.0% | 33.4% |
| GAAP operating margin | −67.0% | 17.1% |
| Operating cash flow | −$150.0 million | $226.4 million |
| Operating cash flow/revenue | −91.8% | 21.3% |
| Market value/latest-quarter revenue, annualized | 4.4 times | 15.6 times |
Basic multiple derived by multiplying the most recent quarterly revenue by four. This does not represent company-provided guidance.
Bloom reported quarterly revenue that was 6.5 times greater than Plug’s. Its market capitalization was roughly 23.3 times higher. This valuation premium aligns with its positive margins and cash generation.
Plug posted significant gains in the first quarter. Revenue climbed 22%, and gross margin moved up from minus 55% to minus 13%. The company’s adjusted loss decreased to eight cents per share.
Chief Executive Jose Luis Crespo stated the quarter set Plug up to achieve positive EBITDAS in the fourth quarter. Plug describes EBITDAS as earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization and share-based expense. The company notes this goal is non-GAAP and forward-looking.
Liquidity is still the primary concern. Below is a comparison featuring company-reported preliminary and unaudited data.
| Plug liquidity metric | Amount | Compared to Q1 operating cash usage |
|---|---|---|
| Preliminary unrestricted cash, June 30 | About $162 million | 1.08 times |
| Projected near-term additional liquidity | More than $80 million | Greater than 0.53 times |
| Preliminary pro-forma total | Over $242 million | Greater than 1.61 times |
| Q1 operating cash usage | $150.0 million | Reference point |
The pro-forma number is calculated by combining anticipated liquidity with initial cash. It omits later expenditures, associated fees, and final closing adjustments. Not all proceeds had been received at the time of the announcement.
Plug anticipates completing its Texas deal by around July 31. The agreement features a $50 million payment at closing, with as much as $26.5 million in contingent payments possible. The total value will depend partly on verified grid capacity.
Risks: The Texas deal is still contingent on meeting certain conditions. In New York, regulatory approvals could lead to delays in finalizing asset disposals. Plug may need additional capital in future if operating cash outflows persist.
Thursday’s gains offer Plug some relief, but do not confirm success in its operations. Shareholders will look for the company’s quarterly results, improved cash conversion, and concrete data-center contracts.
