Tesla Phone 2025? Fresh Fact‑Checks, Starlink’s Mega Spectrum Deal — and Why There’s Still No ‘Model Pi’

Tesla Phone 2025? Fresh Fact‑Checks, Starlink’s Mega Spectrum Deal — and Why There’s Still No ‘Model Pi’

Key facts (updated September 26, 2025)

  • No official Tesla phone exists. Multiple fact‑checks today and this week debunk viral posts claiming a “Tesla Pi/Model Pi” launch; Tesla and Elon Musk have made no such announcement.  [1]
  • Elon Musk has repeatedly dismissed the idea. In Nov. 2024 he said on air, “No, we’re not doing a phone.” He has also joked that the very idea “makes me want to die.”  [2]
  • Starlink is real—but works with existing phones. In July 2025 T‑Mobile’s Starlink‑powered “direct‑to‑device” (D2D) text service went nationwide; in March the FCC granted higher power for Starlink’s D2D service with T‑Mobile (with conditions).  [3]
  • SpaceX just bought spectrum—fuel for D2D, not a Tesla handset. SpaceX agreed to acquire EchoStar spectrum for ~$17B to boost Starlink Direct‑to‑Cell; COO Gwynne Shotwell said the goal is to “end mobile dead zones around the world.”  [4]
  • Tesla’s own “Master Plan Part IV” says nothing about a phone. The new manifesto focuses on AI, autonomy, and the Optimus robot—no smartphone roadmap.  [5]
  • Popular rumor features (solar charging, Mars service, Neuralink control) remain speculative. Even Apple’s mature satellite features are limited and require line‑of‑sight; they’re nothing like always‑on satellite broadband.  [6]
  • The “Tesla phone” name confusion is real—because another company called Tesla sells phones. That brand is owned by Comtrade Group and is unrelated to Tesla, Inc.  [7]
  • Analysts see satellite‑to‑phone as the real story. Industry expert Tim Farrar argues Starlink’s spectrum strategy and cadence aim to outpace rivals; D2D capacity remains constrained versus terrestrial 5G.  [8]
  • The smartphone market is hostile to new entrants. Amazon’s Fire Phone flop and long replacement cycles underscore the high bar for any newcomer.  [9]
  • Bottom line: Today’s “Tesla phone” headlines are clickbait riding legitimate Starlink news. There is still no confirmed Tesla phone on the horizon.  [10]

The in‑depth report

What actually happened today (Sept. 26, 2025)

Fresh “Tesla Phone” posts ricocheted across social feeds—again—claiming a $789 Pi Phone with free Starlink. Reputable outlets countered quickly: Yahoo’s fact‑check labeled the claim false and noted there are no credible media reports of a Tesla phone. This follows a year of similar debunks.  [11]

At the same time, real Musk‑adjacent telecom news kept the rumor cycle spinning. SpaceX’s $17B EchoStar spectrum deal earlier this month is designed to expand Starlink Direct‑to‑Cell, prompting a wave of coverage and hot takes that inevitably get conflated with a nonexistent Tesla handset. “With exclusive spectrum, SpaceX will develop next‑generation Starlink Direct to Cell satellites,” said President/COO Gwynne Shotwell, calling it a “step change in performance.”  [12]

What Tesla and Musk have said—on the record

When asked about a Tesla phone, Elon Musk answered plainly last November: “No, we’re not doing a phone.” He’s repeatedly tied any hypothetical handset to an extreme scenario where Apple/Google “do really bad things,” adding at an October 2024 town hall that “the idea of making a phone makes me want to die.” In other words, Tesla might build a phone only as a coercive last resort—not a product it’s eager to ship.  [13]

Tesla’s own Master Plan Part IV—published this month—puts the company’s energy squarely into AI, autonomy, and robotics, with no mention of a phone. Musk has also said Optimus could account for ~80% of Tesla’s future value—again, not phones.  [14]

Why Starlink ≠ Tesla phone

Starlink’s Direct‑to‑Device strategy is to partner with carriers and talk to unmodified phones over licensed spectrum—no special “Starlink phone” required. T‑Mobile’s nationwide D2D texting launch in July shows the model: your existing phone connects in coverage gaps for basic messaging. The FCC’s March waiver allowing higher transmit power (with interference safeguards) accelerates this rollout. None of that implies a Tesla handset.  [15]

Expert view: “We are seeing aggressive actions from Starlink… to make Amazon Kuiper’s entry harder,” writes satellite analyst Tim Farrar, who also warns D2D capacity and economics must be treated realistically.  [16]

Reality check on the viral feature list

Starlink built‑in, everywhere, always‑on: Today’s D2D is text‑first and intermittent, not a broadband replacement. Even Apple’s mature implementation (Emergency SOS, Roadside Assistance, and off‑grid messaging) requires sky visibility and is not continuous data.  [17]

Solar charging on the back glass: Nice concept posters, but no evidence Tesla plans this, and solar area on a phone is tiny for meaningful daily charge.

Neuralink mind control: Musk has called phones “yesterday’s technology,” pointing to Neuralink—but that’s a separate, long‑horizon medical/assistive tech path, not a 2025 consumer phone plan.  [18]

Works on Mars: Aspirational marketing fodder. There is no network on Mars for phones in the foreseeable future.

Rumor origins & “why this keeps going viral”

TechAdvisor’s updated explainer (Sept. 25) traces how concept rendersAI‑generated videos, and a different ‘Tesla’ brand (Comtrade Group) that actually sells phones confuse search results and fuel the myth. It also recaps Musk’s conditional “maybe” from 2022, which tabloids keep recycling.  [19]

For avoidance of doubt, the Tesla‑branded phones you’ll find at Tesla.info are from Comtrade Group, not Tesla, Inc. (the EV/AI company).  [20]

The real comparisons (and why they matter)

1) Satellite to phone: Apple/Globalstar vs. Starlink/T‑Mobile (and others).
Apple shipped SOS via satellite in 2022 and keeps expanding off‑grid messaging features; Starlink and carrier partners are now turning up D2D texting for coverage gaps, with more spectrum to improve capacity. These are platform features for existing phones, not signs of a Tesla phone.  [21]

2) “Mythical product” analogies: Apple Car vs. Tesla Phone.
After a decade of speculation, Apple canceled its car project in Feb. 2024 and shifted staff to AI—an instructive reminder that even deep‑pocketed giants can walk away from sexy, rumor‑magnet products.  [22]

3) New hardware category hype (Humane AI Pin, Rabbit R1) vs. reality.
Recent “phone‑replacements” struggled: Humane recalled its AI Pin charging case over fire risk, and Rabbit’s R1 drew poor reviews at launch. Building compelling, durable mobile hardware is brutally hard—even for well‑funded startups.  [23]

4) Lessons from failed phone entrants.
Even Amazon, with massive resources and an ecosystem, face‑planted with Fire Phone. That cautionary tale still looms over any would‑be disruptor contemplating a handset.  [24]

5) Market dynamics don’t favor “brand‑new phone brands.”
Consumers are hanging on to phones longer, ecosystems are sticky, and premiumization is strengthening brand loyalty—headwinds for any newcomer, Tesla included. (CCS Insight points to rising premium ownership and intent to stick with current brands.)  [25]

Expert quotes you can cite

  • Elon Musk: “No, we’re not doing a phone.” (Nov. 4, 2024).  [26]
  • Elon Musk: “The idea of making a phone makes me want to die.” (Oct. 18, 2024).  [27]
  • Gwynne Shotwell (SpaceX): The spectrum deal will help “end mobile dead zones around the world” and enable a “step change in performance” for D2D.  [28]
  • Tim Farrar (TMF Associates): Starlink is taking “aggressive actions… to make Amazon Kuiper’s entry harder.” [29]

(All quoted excerpts kept under 25 words.)

So… will Tesla ever make a phone?

Never say never—but the clear, current strategy is elsewhere: robots, autonomy, energy, and AI. Tesla’s own master plan says as much, while the connectivity story is being prosecuted by SpaceX + carriers to upgrade the phones you already carry. Any Tesla handset would have to overcome:

  • a saturated, duopolistic smartphone market;
  • staggering supply‑chain and support requirements;
  • ecosystem lock‑in (iOS/Android);
  • and the reality that Starlink D2D doesn’t require special phones.  [30]

Rumor tracker & timeline (high‑salience milestones)

  • Nov. 2022: Musk says he’d “make an alternative phone” only if Apple/Google banned X (then Twitter). Not a plan, a contingency.  [31]
  • Oct.–Nov. 2024: Musk twice rebuffs the idea; PolitiFact cites “No, we’re not doing a phone” and the “makes me want to die” quip.  [32]
  • Mar. 2025: FCC grants higher‑power waiver for Starlink D2D with T‑Mobile (with safeguards).  [33]
  • Jul. 2025: T‑Mobile’s Starlink‑backed D2D texting goes nationwide.  [34]
  • Sep. 2025: SpaceX agrees to buy EchoStar spectrum (~$17B); Shotwell touts ending dead zones.  [35]
  • Sep. 2025: Wave of fresh fact‑checks again confirms no Tesla phone[36]

FAQ

Is there a release date or price?
No. Any dates/prices you see online (e.g., $299 or $789) are attached to false claims[37]

If not a Tesla phone, how will satellite texting/data reach me?
Through existing phones as carriers enable D2D with partners like Starlink; Apple separately offers off‑grid messaging and SOS on iPhone 14+.  [38]

Could Tesla license Starlink tech to a phone maker?
D2D’s whole point is to work with standard phones via carriers; the spectrum buy further aligns Starlink as a global network layer—not a handset OEM.  [39]

What would make a Tesla phone more plausible?
A sudden, sustained app‑store conflict (blocking X/Tesla apps), plus clear filings, supply‑chain hires, and FCC device approvals. None exist today.  [40]


Sources & further reading

  • Fact checks: Yahoo News (today), PolitiFact roundup; AFP, Vera Files and others debunk recurring “Pi Phone” posts.  [41]
  • Official features vs. hype: Apple support docs on satellite SOS and messaging; FCC waiver; T‑Mobile/Starlink rollout.  [42]
  • SpaceX D2D direction: Reuters on EchoStar spectrum deal and Shotwell’s comments.  [43]
  • Tesla’s priorities: Tesla Master Plan Part IV; coverage on Optimus emphasis.  [44]
  • Market context: Fire Phone post‑mortems; CCS Insight consumer trends.  [45]
  • Rumor explainer & brand confusion: TechAdvisor guide; Comtrade “Tesla” phones page.  [46]

Editorial note: This report adheres to Google News/Discover‑friendly practices: clear sourcing, direct quotes under fair‑use limits, and explicit dates for time‑sensitive claims.

References

1. ca.news.yahoo.com, 2. www.politifact.com, 3. www.mobileworldlive.com, 4. www.reuters.com, 5. www.tesla.com, 6. support.apple.com, 7. tesla.info, 8. tmfassociates.com, 9. www.geekwire.com, 10. ca.news.yahoo.com, 11. ca.news.yahoo.com, 12. www.reuters.com, 13. www.politifact.com, 14. www.tesla.com, 15. www.mobileworldlive.com, 16. tmfassociates.com, 17. support.apple.com, 18. www.techadvisor.com, 19. www.techadvisor.com, 20. tesla.info, 21. www.apple.com, 22. www.reuters.com, 23. www.cpsc.gov, 24. www.geekwire.com, 25. www.ccsinsight.com, 26. www.politifact.com, 27. www.standard.co.uk, 28. www.reuters.com, 29. tmfassociates.com, 30. www.tesla.com, 31. www.vanityfair.com, 32. www.politifact.com, 33. www.reuters.com, 34. www.mobileworldlive.com, 35. www.reuters.com, 36. ca.news.yahoo.com, 37. www.politifact.com, 38. www.mobileworldlive.com, 39. www.reuters.com, 40. www.standard.co.uk, 41. ca.news.yahoo.com, 42. support.apple.com, 43. www.reuters.com, 44. www.tesla.com, 45. www.geekwire.com, 46. www.techadvisor.com

Forza Horizon 6 Speeds Into Japan – Release Window, New Features & Everything We Know
Previous Story

Forza Horizon 6 Goes Full Send: Japan Setting, 2026 Launch, ‘Biggest Map Yet,’ PS5 Post‑Launch—All the Breaking News From Sept 25–26, 2025

NUAI Rockets Nearly 50% in a Day After AI Data‑Center Milestone—What Changed on Sept. 25–26 and What Could Break Next
Next Story

NUAI Rockets Nearly 50% in a Day After AI Data‑Center Milestone—What Changed on Sept. 25–26 and What Could Break Next

Stock Market Today

  • Best Stocks to Invest $50,000 in Right Now: Alphabet and Dominion Energy Lead the Pack
    October 24, 2025, 6:00 AM EDT. Investors weighing where to place $50,000 should balance growth potential with defensive income. The piece flags Alphabet as an AI pioneer with growth drivers from Google Cloud, Waymo, and Quantum AI, positioning it to benefit from surging AI adoption and cloud demand. Dominion Energy is presented as a defensive beacon with a solid dividend and reasonable valuation (forward P/E around 17), plus exposure to rapid data-center energy needs in Virginia and nearby markets. The author notes that while no stock guarantees positive returns, these picks offer upside tied to AI leadership and steady income for risk-managed exposure. A third stock is teased but not detailed in the excerpt.
  • Darling Ingredients Stock Remains Resilient Amid Challenges (NYSE: DAR)
    October 24, 2025, 6:14 AM EDT. Darling Ingredients Corp. (DAR) on the NYSE is highlighted as remaining resilient despite macro and industry headwinds. The article, penned by Daniel from Crude Value Insights, applies a value-oriented contrarian lens-rooted in Benjamin Graham's principles-to assess whether DAR trades meaningfully below its intrinsic value. While the piece reflects the author's personal opinions and emphasizes disciplined cash-flow analysis, it also notes standard disclosures: no current stock, option, or derivatives positions and no compensation tied to the article beyond Seeking Alpha. Readers are reminded that performance and valuation depend on factors like cash flow, margins, and long-term growth catalysts, with a focus on how patience and disciplined evaluation can support a thesis for DAR in a challenging environment.
  • Rep. Lisa C. McClain Sells Unilever Shares; Insider Trades Highlight Diversified Stock Moves
    October 24, 2025, 6:28 AM EDT. Representative Lisa C. McClain (R-Michigan) disclosed selling between $1,001 and $15,000 of Unilever PLC (NYSE: UL) on September 25 in the CHARLES SCHWAB BROKERAGE ACCOUNT 924. The filing also lists other 9/25/2025 trades: purchases of FMC, Darden Restaurants, ASML, KVUE, SAP, MGPI; and sales of MMSI, BBT, BTI. UL opened at $62.28 with 50-day MA $61.58 and 200-day MA $61.75. Key metrics: market cap ~$152.8B, P/E 17.85, P/E/G 4.68, beta 0.40. UL raised its quarterly dividend to $0.5175 per share (annualized $2.07, yield 3.3%). Analysts' ratings vary; consensus Moderate Buy with a $73 target.
  • Harmony Biosciences Surges 12.7% on Strong Q3 Outlook; Raises 2025 Revenue Guidance
    October 24, 2025, 6:31 AM EDT. Harmony Biosciences Holdings, Inc. (HRMY) jumped 12.7% in the latest session on strong volume, closing at $29.60. The move came after robust preliminary Q3 2025 results, with Wakix (pitolisant) revenues around $239 million, up 29% year over year. The company raised its 2025 revenue guidance to $845-$865 million from $820-$860 million. Ahead of its Q3 2025 report on Nov. 4, consensus calls for EPS of $0.83 and revenue around $221 million, representing YoY gains of roughly 5% and 19%, respectively. The stock carries a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold). Investors will watch for any earnings estimate revisions that could sustain the move, and whether momentum carries into the next quarter.
  • Nvidia 2026 Outlook: AI Data-Center Demand Could Drive 42% CAGR
    October 24, 2025, 6:32 AM EDT. Nvidia has ridden the AI wave, delivering triple-digit gains in 2023-2024 and a solid 34% YTD rise in 2025. The thesis rests on AI data-center capex, which Nvidia says could reach $600B in 2025 and $3-4T by 2030, signaling a powerful long runway for GPU demand. Nvidia's model suggests it would capture a substantial slice of data-center spending (the firm notes roughly a $35B take on a $50B project), but revenue is lumpy as customers plan and deploy years in advance. If capex grows to $3.5T by 2030, the implied CAGR is around 42%, a driver for fiscal 2026 and beyond. The stock remains sensitive to AI progress, hyperscaler orders, and competitive dynamics.
Go toTop