The battle between Tesla (TSLA) and Ford (F) is no longer just about cars — it’s about radically different ways to survive the EV transition investors are suddenly a lot less sure about.
As of December 5, 2025, Tesla trades around $455 per share, near its 52‑week high just below $489, valuing the company at roughly $1.5 trillion and a trailing P/E ratio above 270. [1] Ford, meanwhile, changes hands at roughly $13 per share, with a market cap near $51 billion, a P/E around 11, and a dividend yield close to 5.7%. [2]
At the same time, U.S. EV demand is hitting records: more than 1.2 million light‑duty EVs were sold in the first three quarters of 2025, and EVs reached nearly 12% of new‑car sales in Q3. [3] Yet the end of the $7,500 federal EV tax credit on September 30 triggered a whiplash effect — sales pulled forward into Q3, followed by sharp declines in October and November. [4] That policy shock now sits at the center of the Tesla vs Ford stock story.
This article pulls together the latest news, earnings, forecasts and analyst views on both companies, then compares them on valuation, growth prospects and risk — without telling you which one to buy.
1. EV backdrop: demand is strong, policy is chaotic
Before zooming in on Tesla and Ford, it’s worth understanding the playing field.
- Record U.S. EV sales: EV sales have “broken records nearly every month in 2025,” with more than 1.2 million EVs sold through Q3 and EV share near 12%. [5]
- Tax credit cliff: The expiration of the federal consumer EV incentive at the end of September caused September BEV sales to surge more than 40% year over year, then October sales to drop about 25% versus a year earlier as the market adjusted to higher upfront prices. [6]
- Tesla still leads, but share is slipping: U.S. data show Tesla’s sales are still growing, but its domestic EV market share has fallen to about 41% as legacy automakers and new entrants roll out more models. [7]
- Ford is in the pack, not the leader: In the first half of 2025, the Tesla Model Y alone captured 27.6% of U.S. BEV sales, with the Model 3 at 11.8%. Ford’s Mustang Mach‑E held 3.8% market share and the F‑150 Lightning about 2.3%, highlighting Ford’s role as a meaningful but secondary EV player. [8]
In other words: consumer interest in EVs is not the problem. Policy volatility and pricing are. Tesla’s answer is to cut prices and push software/AI; Ford’s is to lean into hybrids and cheaper EV platforms.
2. Tesla (TSLA) stock now: record revenue, pressured profits, sky‑high valuation
2.1 Price, valuation and size
Key snapshot for Tesla as of early December 2025:
- Share price: about $455
- Market cap: roughly $1.5 trillion, making Tesla one of a small group of “trillion‑dollar” stocks globally. [9]
- Trailing P/E: about 277, versus a Consumer Cyclical sector average around 19. [10]
- Price‑to‑sales (P/S): about 15.3× on trailing‑12‑month revenue of $95.6 billion, which is actually down ~1.6% year‑over‑year. [11]
That combination — flat revenue, shrinking margins, but tech‑like multiples — is the core of the Tesla valuation debate.
2.2 Q3 2025 earnings: revenue up, margins down
Tesla’s Q3 2025 results were a mixed bag:
- Revenue: about $28.1 billion, up ~12% year over year, a return to growth after two quarters of decline. [12]
- GAAP net income: roughly $1.4 billion, down about 37% from Q3 2024 as price cuts, tariffs and lower regulatory‑credit revenue hit profitability. [13]
- Operating margin: around 5.8%, down from 10.8% a year earlier. [14]
- Free cash flow: nearly $4.0 billion for the quarter, with cash and investments above $41 billion, giving Tesla one of the strongest balance sheets in autos. [15]
- Deliveries: about 497,000 vehicles, a record quarter, helped by buyers rushing to lock in tax credits before they expired. [16]
So Tesla is growing revenue again and printing plenty of cash, but earning less on each car than a year ago.
2.3 Regional trends and new products
Recent news gives a more nuanced picture:
- China comeback, but still a tough year: In November 2025, Tesla sold 86,700 China‑made EVs, up 10% year over year and its second‑best month of 2025, driven by new Model Y and Model 3 variants and promotions. Yet Tesla has managed YOY sales growth in China in only three months of 2025, and year‑to‑date deliveries are still down more than 8%. [17]
- Low‑cost Model 3 (and Model Y) strategy: Tesla has begun rolling out a cheaper “Model 3 Standard” in Europe following its U.S. launch two months earlier, pricing it around €37,970 in Germany, below the premium Model 3, while still offering over 300 miles of range. [18] The company also launched a more affordable Model Y earlier in 2025. [19]
- Big bet on AI and robotics: Tesla’s own Q2 and Q3 update decks and earnings calls emphasize that long‑term profit growth is expected to come less from hardware and more from autonomy (FSD, robotaxis) and its Optimus humanoid robot, with a dedicated “Cybercab” robotaxi platform targeting volume production in 2026. [20]
The net effect: Tesla is sacrificing margin today to keep volumes high, defend market share and fund enormous AI/robotics investments it believes will pay off later.
2.4 Analyst views and forecasts on TSLA
Wall Street is deeply split:
- On MarketBeat, 44 analysts give Tesla a consensus rating of “Hold” with 9 Sells, 13 Holds, 21 Buys and 1 Strong Buy, and an average 12‑month price target of ~$399 — implying about 12% downside from current levels. [21]
- StockAnalysis, using a smaller analyst set, shows a “Buy” consensus and an average target around $384, still 15–16% below the current price of roughly $455. [22]
- Simply Wall St estimates future earnings growth of about 34% per year and revenue growth around 16% annually, assuming Tesla executes on software/autonomy and energy ambitions. [23]
- FactSet‑based consensus now expects 2025 EPS around $1.7, down roughly 30% from 2024, before growth re‑accelerates later in the decade. [24]
On the skeptical side, high‑profile investors like Michael Burry have publicly argued that Tesla’s valuation is “excessive,” pointing to its P/E above 270, slowing auto growth and dependence on optimistic AI/robotaxi assumptions. [25]
In short: TSLA is priced for big future growth in AI and autonomy, not for the car business it runs today. If that future arrives, the valuation may be justified; if not, there’s a lot of air underneath.
3. Ford (F) stock now: solid profits, deep EV losses and a pivot to value & hybrids
3.1 Price, valuation, dividend
Ford looks like a completely different animal on the screen:
- Share price: roughly $13
- Market cap: around $51 billion
- Trailing P/E: about 11.1, far below Tesla and modestly below many U.S. consumer‑cyclical peers. [26]
- Dividend yield: about 5.7%; Ford recently declared a $0.15 per‑share Q4 dividend, payable December 1, 2025. [27]
Where Tesla offers hyper‑growth and no dividend, Ford offers income and value‑style metrics, but with real structural challenges.
3.2 Q3 2025 earnings: better than feared
Ford’s Q3 2025 numbers were actually quite strong at the group level:
- Revenue: a record $50.5 billion, about 9% higher than a year earlier. [28]
- Non‑GAAP net profit: about $1.82 billion, down 7% year on year, with non‑GAAP EPS of $0.45, also slightly below the prior year but well ahead of analyst estimates (consensus ~$0.35–0.38). [29]
- Operating margin: around 3.1%, up from 1.9% a year earlier, reflecting better performance in Ford Blue (traditional vehicles) and Ford Pro (commercial). [30]
By legacy automaker standards, that’s respectable profitability, especially in a choppy demand and pricing environment.
3.3 The EV problem: Model e’s multibillion‑dollar losses
Look under the hood, though, and Ford’s EV unit is a major drag:
- The Model e division generated $1.8 billion in revenue in Q3 2025 (up about 50% year over year), but reported an EBIT loss of $1.4 billion, with an eye‑watering EBIT margin of –79%. [31]
- Year‑to‑date 2025, the EV division has lost about $3.6 billion, following losses of $5.1B in 2024, $4.7B in 2023and $2.2B in 2022. [32]
- Management has warned that Model e could lose around $5.5 billion for full‑year 2025, mainly because Ford cannot yet build EVs cheaply enough to profit at price points consumers will accept. [33]
So while headline Ford earnings look fine, a big part of that profit is being eaten by EV losses.
3.4 November 2025 sales shock: EV demand or policy hangover?
The market got a fresh reminder of those issues with Ford’s November 2025 U.S. sales report:
- Total U.S. sales: about 165,000 vehicles, down 1% year over year. [34]
- EV sales: down ~61% year over year to 4,247 units, and down 10% month‑over‑month — EVs were less than 3%of Ford’s sales vs 6.5% a year ago. [35]
- Individual models: Mustang Mach‑E sales fell 49% (to about 3,014 units); F‑150 Lightning sales tumbled 72%(to about 1,006 units); E‑Transit van sales dropped 82% to 227 units. [36]
- Hybrid sales were the bright spot, rising about 13–14% to over 16,000 units. [37]
The collapse in EV sales came immediately after the federal EV tax credit expired under President Trump’s July 4 tax bill, which removed up to $7,500 of incentive per vehicle. [38] This isn’t just a Ford story — it shows how fragile EV demand becomes when policy support is pulled suddenly.
3.5 Ford’s new strategy: cheaper EVs and more hybrids
In response, Ford is re‑routing its EV roadmap:
- CEO Jim Farley has said that affordable EVs starting “around $30,000” are “not a distant plan” but “right around the corner”, built on a new Ford Universal EV Platform. [39]
- Reuters reports that the first vehicle on this platform will be a midsize EV pickup (roughly Ranger/Maverick‑sized), due in 2027 and targeting a starting price “around $30,000.” [40]
- Ford is leaning hard into hybrids as a bridge technology, as they’re proving far more profitable and popular than its first wave of large, expensive battery‑EV trucks. [41]
Translation: Ford is pulling back from high‑end EVs, accepting near‑term losses, and betting it can become competitive once it can ship cheaper, smaller EVs and hybrids at scale.
4. Tesla vs Ford by the numbers
Putting the two side by side:
- Market value
- Tesla: about $1.5 trillion
- Ford: about $51 billion
- Tesla is ~29× Ford’s market cap. [42]
- Valuation
- Tesla: P/E ≈ 277, P/S ≈ 15.3×
- Ford: P/E ≈ 11.1, single‑digit P/S (well under 1×) and a high dividend yield. [43]
- Tesla’s P/E is roughly 25× higher than Ford’s.
- Recent profitability (Q3 2025)
- Growth profile
- Tesla: TTM revenue is actually slightly down year over year, but Q3 returned to growth, and analysts still expect mid‑teens revenue growth and 30‑plus percent EPS growth annually going forward if AI/robotaxi bets pay off. [46]
- Ford: Forecasts call for flat‑to‑slightly‑down revenue in 2025 and only modest growth in 2026, though EPS is expected to improve from about $1.08 in 2025 to $1.51 in 2026 as costs are managed and EV losses gradually narrow. [47]
So, today’s profits look surprisingly similar (both around 5% net margin), but the market is pricing Tesla as if its earnings will compound dramatically, while Ford is priced as a cyclical carmaker that might muddle through with modest growth and big dividends.
5. Analyst ratings and price targets: both “Hold,” different reasons
Despite radically different valuations, both stocks cluster around “Hold” territory in Wall Street models.
5.1 Tesla (TSLA)
- MarketBeat: Consensus “Hold”, with 44 analysts, average price target ~$399 (about 12% downside), high target $600, low $19 — a huge dispersion that reflects disagreement about Tesla’s long‑term AI/autonomy prospects. [48]
- StockAnalysis & other aggregators show a “Buy” consensus but similarly suggest mid‑teens downside based on current price and average targets. [49]
Many models effectively say: “We believe in Tesla long‑term, but the stock already discounts a lot of that future.”
5.2 Ford (F)
- MarketBeat: Consensus “Hold” as well, from 16 analysts — 2 Sells, 11 Holds, 3 Buys — with an average target around $11.88, implying ~9% downside from around $13. [50]
- StockAnalysis data show flat‑to‑slightly‑declining revenue in 2025, with some EPS recovery in 2026, which keeps valuations low but not screamingly cheap once EV losses are factored in. [51]
In other words, the Street is cautious on both names: Tesla because of valuation and execution risk, Ford because of the EV hole it has to climb out of.
6. Key risks and catalysts for 2026 and beyond
6.1 Tesla: execution, regulation, China and AI hype
Major swing factors for TSLA:
- Autonomy & robotaxis: If Tesla can prove robust Level 4/5 autonomy and deploy a profitable robotaxi network (“Cybercab”), the current valuation might even look conservative. If autonomy lags or regulators push back, the AI premium could deflate. [52]
- Margin recovery: Investors will be watching whether auto gross margin can rebound from mid‑teens to something closer to the high‑20s of prior years, as price cuts and incentive churn fade. [53]
- China competition: Local rivals like BYD and Xiaomi are increasingly undercutting Tesla on price. November’s 10% YOY sales uptick in China is encouraging, but year‑to‑date sales are still down and market share is under pressure. [54]
- Political and regulatory risk: Higher tariffs, changes to emissions rules and the withdrawal of EV credits have already hit Tesla’s profits via increased costs and lower regulatory‑credit income. [55]
- Sentiment/cycle risk: Some analysts warn that Tesla has become a kind of poster child for AI‑driven exuberance, making it vulnerable to sharp re‑rating if growth disappoints. [56]
6.2 Ford: EV transition, hybrids and profitability mix
For Ford, the main questions are:
- Can the EV unit get anywhere near breakeven? A division losing $3.6B year‑to‑date with a –79% EBIT margin cannot continue indefinitely; investors are watching for a credible path to lower battery costs, simpler platforms and better scale. [57]
- Will hybrids be enough? Ford’s hybrid growth is real, but regulators globally are marching toward stricter emissions rules. Leaning on hybrids for too long could leave Ford exposed if policy swings back hard toward pure EVs. [58]
- Affordable EVs on time and on budget: The planned $30,000 EV pickup from 2027 is promising, but timing, cost and demand all have to line up for it to be a success rather than another loss leader. [59]
- Macro and truck cycle: A big chunk of Ford’s profit still comes from trucks and commercial vehicles (Ford Pro). A recession, a construction slowdown, or prolonged supply disruptions (like the recent supplier fire that hit F‑series sales) could offset improvements elsewhere. [60]
7. What kind of investor might favor each stock? (Not financial advice)
This isn’t a recommendation to buy or sell anything, but the profiles are very different:
Tesla (TSLA) may appeal more to investors who:
- Are comfortable with high volatility and rich valuations.
- Believe Tesla can successfully transition from mainly a car company to an AI + robotics + energy platform, with robotaxis and software as major profit drivers.
- Think EV penetration, autonomy and robotics will create multi‑trillion‑dollar markets in which Tesla will keep a leading share.
- Can tolerate the risk that earnings might remain under pressure in the near term while the company spends heavily on AI and price cuts.
Ford (F) may appeal more to investors who:
- Prioritize income and value metrics, accepting slower growth.
- Want exposure to autos but don’t want to pay tech‑stock multiples.
- Believe Ford can stabilize its EV losses, grow hybrids and commercial fleets, and sustain its dividend.
- Accept that the EV transition is messy and Ford might end up as a solid, cash‑generating incumbent rather than a hyper‑growth winner.
Again, these are general profiles, not personalized advice. Your decision should depend on your own time horizon, risk tolerance, tax situation and broader portfolio.
8. Bottom line
- Tesla is a high‑beta EV + AI story: record revenue, strong cash generation, but shrinking margins and a valuation that assumes big payoffs from autonomy and robotics in the next decade.
- Ford is a classic value‑and‑dividend auto stock: decent profits and a rich yield today, but saddled with a money‑losing EV unit and the challenge of catching up in a rapidly electrifying market.
Both face the same macro reality — EV demand is structurally strong, but policy whiplash and price sensitivity are brutal. How they navigate that, and how much investors are willing to pay for their respective paths, will define the Tesla vs Ford stock debate into 2026 and beyond.
Disclaimer: This article is for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute financial, investment or trading advice. Always do your own research and consider speaking with a licensed financial adviser before making investment decisions.
References
1. www.investing.com, 2. fullratio.com, 3. theicct.org, 4. theicct.org, 5. theicct.org, 6. theicct.org, 7. caredge.com, 8. autovista24.autovistagroup.com, 9. stockanalysis.com, 10. fullratio.com, 11. stockanalysis.com, 12. carboncredits.com, 13. carboncredits.com, 14. www.ft.com, 15. www.teslarati.com, 16. carboncredits.com, 17. www.marketwatch.com, 18. www.reuters.com, 19. www.reuters.com, 20. www.tesla.com, 21. www.marketbeat.com, 22. stockanalysis.com, 23. simplywall.st, 24. www.investors.com, 25. www.reuters.com, 26. fullratio.com, 27. www.wisesheets.io, 28. q4live.s205.clientfiles.s3-website-us-east-1.amazonaws.com, 29. roboforex.com, 30. finance.yahoo.com, 31. roboforex.com, 32. finance.yahoo.com, 33. www.electrive.com, 34. www.barrons.com, 35. www.barrons.com, 36. www.nasdaq.com, 37. www.nasdaq.com, 38. www.barrons.com, 39. electrek.co, 40. www.reuters.com, 41. finance.yahoo.com, 42. stockanalysis.com, 43. fullratio.com, 44. carboncredits.com, 45. q4live.s205.clientfiles.s3-website-us-east-1.amazonaws.com, 46. stockanalysis.com, 47. stockanalysis.com, 48. www.marketbeat.com, 49. stockanalysis.com, 50. www.marketbeat.com, 51. stockanalysis.com, 52. www.tesla.com, 53. carboncredits.com, 54. www.marketwatch.com, 55. www.ft.com, 56. www.reuters.com, 57. eletric-vehicles.com, 58. www.barrons.com, 59. www.reuters.com, 60. www.barrons.com
