On Tuesday, December 9, 2025, US‑listed EV stocks traded through another volatile session as Wall Street digested Morgan Stanley’s newly cautious stance on the sector and mounting talk of an “EV winter” in 2026.
Despite the bearish narrative, market action was mixed:
- Tesla (TSLA) closed around $449.78, up roughly 2.3% on the day, clawing back part of Monday’s downgrade‑driven slide. [1]
- Rivian (RIVN) ended near $17.66, up about 0.3%, extending a powerful multi‑week rebound. [2]
- Lucid Group (LCID) fell again, finishing close to $12.47, down about 2.3%, as a high‑profile “EV winter” downgrade continued to bite. [3]
- Legacy automakers with meaningful EV exposure—General Motors (GM) and Ford (F)—were modestly higher, at about +1.5% and +0.2%, respectively, helped by an upgrade for GM in the same Morgan Stanley note that hit pure‑play EV names. [4]
Beneath those price moves is a sharper shift in tone: Wall Street is no longer treating “EV stock” as a single trade. It’s drawing a hard line between cash‑generating incumbents and capital‑hungry EV startups facing years of losses and tighter funding conditions. [5]
1. Market Snapshot: How Major EV Stocks Traded Today
Tesla (TSLA): Downgraded, but Still the Benchmark
Tesla remains the bellwether, and its tape told a nuanced story today.
- Price: about $449.78, up ~2.3% vs. Monday’s close.
- The bounce comes after Morgan Stanley’s new lead auto analyst, Andrew Percoco, launched coverage with an Equal‑Weight (Hold) rating and a $425 price target, trimming expectations for the core auto business while leaning heavily on AI and robotics (notably the Optimus humanoid robot) to justify valuation. [6]
- A separate industry piece notes Tesla’s North American EV sales headwinds and points out that the stock trades at one of the richest earnings multiples in the S&P 500, with current prices already reflecting ambitious AI and robotics optionality. [7]
Morgan Stanley’s models now assume slower EV adoption in the US, with Tesla’s 2026 delivery volumes cut by over 10% versus previous expectations and North American EV sales projected to fall around 12% next year. [8]
In parallel, reporting from Barron’s highlights declining Tesla sales in China, even as investors stay focused on AI, robotaxis and Optimus. [9]
Rivian (RIVN): Big Rally Meets “Sell” Call
Rivian has been one of the sector’s brightest spots in recent weeks:
- Price: about $17.66, up ~0.3% today and more than 30% since early November, according to recent analysis. [10]
- A fresh deep‑dive from 24/7 Wall St. notes that Wall Street’s median 12‑month price target sits around $13.98, implying more than 20% downside from current levels. The consensus rating is a “Hold” across 19 analysts (5 Buy, 8 Hold, 6 Sell). [11]
The big overhang is Morgan Stanley’s call: its new EV team downgraded Rivian to Underweight (Sell) and warned that an “EV winter” into 2026 will hit demand just as early‑stage players like Rivian are burning cash and scaling production. [12]
Lucid Group (LCID): Poster Child for “EV Winter” Risk
Lucid was among today’s weakest EV performers, continuing a steep slide:
- Price: roughly $12.47, down about 2.3%, leaving the stock near its 52‑week lows. [13]
Two fresh pieces of research framed the bearish tone:
- Benzinga reports that Lucid is under “heavy selling pressure” after Morgan Stanley cut its rating to Underweight from Equal Weight, slashing the price target from $30 to $10 and warning that the company won’t reach gross profit break‑even until 2028 and may still be posting EBIT losses through 2031. The note also flags a likely $2 billion equity raise by the second half of 2026, a big ask for a company with a market cap near $4 billion and short interest around 50% of float. [14]
- MarketBeat now shows Lucid with a consensus “Reduce” rating from 11 firms: 4 Sell, 5 Hold, 2 Buy, and an average 12‑month target around $21.54—well above today’s price but far below prior peak expectations. [15]
Taken together, Tuesday’s action reinforces Lucid as the pure‑play EV name most exposed to a funding squeeze if the “EV winter” thesis plays out.
Chinese EV Makers: NIO and XPeng Under Pressure
US‑listed Chinese EV stocks were mixed:
- NIO (NIO) slipped about 0.8% to $5.06.
- A new MarketBeat filing shows American Century Companies increased its NIO stake by 37.4% in Q2, now holding over 965,000 shares, while several other institutional investors have also added exposure. [16]
- NIO carries a high debt load (debt‑to‑equity ~2.36) and remains loss‑making, but its 52‑week range of $3.02–$8.02 and a beta near 1.0 underline its role as a high‑beta EV proxy rather than a defensive play. [17]
- XPeng (XPEV) fell about 3.8% to $19.75, despite strong recent delivery data. [18]
- Recent reporting notes XPeng delivered 36,728 smart EVs in November 2025, up around 19% year‑on‑year, but the stock has been volatile as investors reassess valuation after a big year‑to‑date run‑up. [19]
These moves highlight a key theme: solid delivery growth isn’t enough to insulate high‑growth EV names when global investors are re‑rating the entire space.
EV Charging Stocks: A Bumpy Road to Profitability
EV charging names saw divergent performance:
- ChargePoint (CHPT) rose about 2.6% to $9.75, extending a modest rebound.
- A detailed Finimize breakdown describes how ChargePoint is pivoting toward higher‑margin subscriptions, with subscription revenue up 14% year‑on‑year in the latest quarter and now roughly 35% of total sales, even as total revenue declined and the company remains loss‑making. [20]
- Analysts expect revenue to re‑accelerate by nearly 30% in FY2027 and 33% in FY2028, but the stock still trades on a rich EV/sales multiple and carries high volatility and short interest. [21]
- EVgo (EVGO) finished around $3.39, up about 1.0%, helped by renewed interest in charging networks after recent news coverage of the space. [22]
- Blink Charging (BLNK) tumbled roughly 8.2% to about $1.01, underscoring how fragile sentiment remains for smaller, unprofitable EV infrastructure plays. [23]
In short, charging stocks are trading like leveraged bets on EV adoption—they rally on long‑term infrastructure growth stories, but sell off quickly whenever EV unit forecasts are revised lower.
2. Why Wall Street Is Talking About an “EV Winter”
The phrase “EV winter” dominated EV headlines this week, and it’s not just hyperbole.
Morgan Stanley’s Sector Reset
Morgan Stanley’s new auto team has effectively reset the narrative for US EV stocks:
- The bank downgraded Tesla to Equal‑Weight, Rivian and Lucid to Underweight (Sell), and upgraded GM to Buy, arguing that demand for full EVs in North America will cool meaningfully in 2025–2026. [24]
- The note warns of an “EV winter” into 2026, driven by the phaseout of tax credits, sticky monthly payments, and consumer hesitation about charging and long‑term resale values. [25]
- For Tesla, Percoco’s models cut 2026 delivery volume forecasts by about 10.5%, even as the price target is raised to $425 to reflect potential value in Optimus and AI software. [26]
CBT News notes that North American EV sales are now projected to decline roughly 12% next year, even as Tesla’s AI and robotics story keeps the stock’s valuation lofty—among the highest in the S&P 500. [27]
Short‑Term Chill vs Long‑Term Heat
Crucially, “EV winter” is not a call that electrification is dead. A widely cited summary of broker and research forecasts shows:
- Global EV sales are still expected to grow at around 25–27% per year through 2030, potentially reaching 34–35 million units annually by the end of the decade. TechStock²
That’s why some analysts emphasize that the problem is timing and mix, not destiny:
- US demand could stagnate for a few years as incentives fade and higher financing costs bite.
- China and parts of Europe continue to see robust EV and plug‑in hybrid adoption, where policy support remains strong. TechStock²+1
For investors, the immediate implication is more dispersion: not all EV‑related stocks will move in the same direction anymore.
3. Company‑Specific Storylines You Need to Know
Tesla: AI and Robots vs Slowing EV Demand
Today’s rebound doesn’t change Tesla’s central tension:
- Auto margins are under pressure from price cuts and slowing EV growth.
- Morgan Stanley and other analysts argue that the stock’s current valuation is heavily dependent on unproven businesses like Optimus humanoid robots and robotaxis, even as the core auto unit faces slower growth. [28]
- Meanwhile, reporting out of China points to softening Tesla EV sales, suggesting the company is not immune even in the world’s largest EV market. [29]
The takeaway: Tesla is still the sector’s benchmark, but its premium multiple is now being scrutinized as much for what it promises (AI) as for what it already delivers (cars).
Rivian: Execution vs Valuation
Rivian’s story remains a tug‑of‑war between strong product / brand and capital intensity:
- Its stock has rallied sharply—over 30% since early November—on improving production metrics and optimism about new models and commercial vans. [30]
- Yet Morgan Stanley’s downgrade to Underweight with a $12 target underscores concerns that Rivian is still years from sustained profitability and highly sensitive to any further slowdown in US EV demand or tax credits. [31]
- The 24/7 Wall St. forecast lines up with that caution, highlighting that Wall Street’s median target sits well below today’s price and the consensus rating is only “Hold.” [32]
In a world where money is no longer free, even “good” EV stories are being discounted aggressively if they require heavy ongoing capital.
Lucid: High Tech, High Burn
Lucid’s luxury positioning and industry‑leading battery efficiency haven’t been enough to offset fears over its balance sheet:
- Morgan Stanley expects no gross profit break‑even until 2028 and EBIT losses into 2031, and forecasts a $2 billion capital raise by late 2026—a hefty dilution risk at current valuations. [33]
- MarketBeat’s aggregation of Street views shows a consensus “Reduce” rating, skewed toward Sell and Hold, and emphasizes deep negative margins (~225% net margin, high negative ROE) in recent quarters. [34]
Put simply, Lucid has become the market’s go‑to example of EV funding risk in an era of slower demand and higher scrutiny.
NIO & XPeng: China’s EV Champions Face a Tough Tape
- For NIO, growing institutional positions—like American Century’s 37% increase in holdings—suggest some investors still see value at depressed prices. However, high leverage, thin margins and macro uncertainty in China mean the stock trades as a volatile, leveraged bet on the broader Chinese EV cycle. [35]
- XPeng is delivering robust volume growth but remains a valuation battleground name; recent analysis by Simply Wall St flags the mix of strong YTD performance, November’s 19% delivery growth and growing questions about how much of that optimism is already baked into the stock. [36]
4. The EV Ecosystem: Suppliers and Chargers Still Investing
While automakers dominate headlines, EV suppliers and infrastructure names quietly shaped today’s narrative too.
Wolfspeed & Toyota: Betting on Silicon Carbide
A new press release from Wolfspeed (WOLF) announced that its silicon carbide power MOSFETs will be used in Toyota’s onboard charger systems for new battery‑electric vehicles, highlighting the continued shift to high‑efficiency power electronics in EV platforms. [37]
The deal underscores that behind the volatility in EV stocks, the technology stack is still advancing—from chips to chargers.
Charging Networks: Subscriptions, Scale and Risk
ChargePoint’s latest strategic update, summarized in the Finimize report, paints a picture familiar across the EV ecosystem:
- Hardware revenue is down, but software and subscriptions are growing at mid‑teens to 20% rates.
- The company has cut operating expenses and slowed cash burn, but still has negative free cash flow and a lofty valuation multiple. [38]
Blink and EVgo face similar challenges: racing to scale and secure grants (such as US NEVI infrastructure funds) while markets punish any hint that profitability might be further away than hoped. [39]
5. What Today’s Moves Mean for EV Investors (Educational, Not Financial Advice)
Nothing in this article is personal investment advice, but today’s action does suggest a few frameworks long‑term investors are using to think about EV stocks today:
- Separate near‑term “EV winter” from long‑term EV adoption
- In the US, 2025–2026 may be a pause as incentives fade and affordability bites.
- Globally, the electrification trend remains intact, with mid‑20s CAGR EV growth projected through 2030. TechStock²
- Distinguish incumbents from startups
- GM, Ford and Toyota have profitable ICE and hybrid businesses to fund EV investments, which is why calls like Morgan Stanley’s are increasingly favoring them. [40]
- Pure‑play EV startups (Rivian, Lucid and others) must prove they can survive a funding and demand slowdown without crippling dilution.
- Focus on balance sheets, not just buzzwords
- Metrics like cash runway, gross margin trajectory, and required capital raises (Lucid’s potential $2B equity raise, for example) are front and center in today’s research notes. [41]
- Look beyond carmakers to the broader EV value chain
- Charging networks, semiconductor vendors (like Wolfspeed), battery suppliers and software platformsmay offer different risk/return profiles from headline auto stocks, even though they are tied to the same theme. [42]
- Use diversification tools
- Analysts frequently highlight EV‑themed ETFs and broader clean‑tech funds for investors who want exposure to EV growth without picking individual winners in a very volatile corner of the market. TechStock²
6. Key Takeaways for December 9, 2025
- Tesla, Rivian and Lucid remain the focal point of EV stock volatility, with Tesla rebounding, Rivian consolidating gains, and Lucid sliding further on funding and profitability worries. [43]
- Morgan Stanley’s “EV winter” thesis is reshaping sector sentiment, lowering expectations for US EV demand into 2026 while still acknowledging robust global growth. [44]
- Chinese EV names (NIO, XPeng) and charging stocks (ChargePoint, EVgo, Blink) are trading more like high‑beta satellites around that narrative—prone to big swings as forecasts shift. [45]
- The EV ecosystem continues to deepen, with moves like Wolfspeed’s new silicon‑carbide deal with Toyota underscoring that long‑term electrification investment is still very much underway. [46]
EV stocks today are no longer a one‑direction bet on growth. They’re a stock‑picker’s market, shaped by interest rates, policy shifts, and the brutal math of cash flow and capital needs. Anyone considering exposure should be ready for volatility, do their own research, and, ideally, consult a qualified financial adviser before making investment decisions.
References
1. www.barrons.com, 2. 247wallst.com, 3. www.benzinga.com, 4. evxl.co, 5. evxl.co, 6. www.heygotrade.com, 7. www.cbtnews.com, 8. www.cbtnews.com, 9. www.barrons.com, 10. finance.yahoo.com, 11. 247wallst.com, 12. evxl.co, 13. www.benzinga.com, 14. www.benzinga.com, 15. www.marketbeat.com, 16. www.marketbeat.com, 17. www.marketbeat.com, 18. finance.yahoo.com, 19. finance.yahoo.com, 20. finimize.com, 21. finimize.com, 22. finance.yahoo.com, 23. finimize.com, 24. evxl.co, 25. evxl.co, 26. www.heygotrade.com, 27. www.cbtnews.com, 28. www.heygotrade.com, 29. www.barrons.com, 30. finance.yahoo.com, 31. evxl.co, 32. 247wallst.com, 33. www.benzinga.com, 34. www.marketbeat.com, 35. www.marketbeat.com, 36. finance.yahoo.com, 37. investor.wolfspeed.com, 38. finimize.com, 39. finimize.com, 40. evxl.co, 41. www.benzinga.com, 42. investor.wolfspeed.com, 43. www.benzinga.com, 44. evxl.co, 45. finance.yahoo.com, 46. investor.wolfspeed.com


