NEW YORK — December 16, 2025 (early afternoon ET): U.S. energy stocks are under pressure in Tuesday’s session as crude oil breaks to fresh multi-year lows, dragging down the sector’s biggest names—integrated majors, shale producers, and oilfield services—while refiners also slump as fuel prices weaken.
Oil’s move is the story: traders are pricing in a higher chance of a Russia–Ukraine peace process that could ultimately loosen constraints on Russian supply, while soft China data revives demand worries. [1]
Energy stocks today: where the sector is trading (U.S., intraday)
Energy-linked ETFs and bellwether stocks were broadly lower around early afternoon (latest available trade prints roughly 1:31–1:33 p.m. ET, near the 1:45 p.m. snapshot):
- iShares U.S. Energy ETF (IYE): -3.41% to $46.33
- Vanguard Energy ETF (VDE): -2.80% to $123.71
- Oil & gas explorers (XOP): -3.81% to $124.93
- Oil services (OIH): -4.57% to $283.15
Large-cap integrated majors and producers
- Exxon Mobil (XOM): -2.37% to $114.97
- Chevron (CVX): -1.88% to $146.99
- ConocoPhillips (COP): -3.19% to $91.35
- EOG Resources (EOG): -3.24% to $102.50
- Occidental (OXY): -2.92% to $39.02
Oilfield services
- SLB (SLB): -3.09% to $37.70
- Halliburton (HAL): -4.33% to $27.18
Refiners
- Marathon Petroleum (MPC): -4.92% to $176.39
- Phillips 66 (PSX): -4.88% to $134.60
- Valero (VLO): -2.98% to $162.90
Midstream / pipelines (generally steadier, but still red today)
- Kinder Morgan (KMI): -1.53% to $26.31
- Williams (WMB): -1.51% to $58.58
- ONEOK (OKE): -2.14% to $71.27
- Energy Transfer (ET): -0.73% to $16.38
Energy’s weakness also shows up at the index level: Reuters highlighted energy among the sectors leading declines during a choppy session as investors digested fresh U.S. economic data and shifting rate expectations. [2]
Oil is driving the tape: Brent under $60, WTI near multi-year lows
Crude prices are sliding again Tuesday, with Brent trading below $60 and WTI around the mid-$50s in reporting throughout the day. [3]
Two intraday dynamics matter for energy equities:
- Upstream cash-flow sensitivity: For E&Ps and the upstream-heavy parts of big oil, a move from the $60s into the mid-$50s can quickly change investor assumptions about 2026 free cash flow, buybacks, and drilling budgets.
- Services “second-derivative” risk: When producers get spooked, service names often fall harder because they’re exposed to future activity levels (rig counts, completions, offshore project timing), not just today’s commodity print—something reflected in today’s sharper drops for oilfield services ETFs and stocks.
What’s behind today’s crude selloff?
1) Russia–Ukraine peace talk optimism is shrinking the “risk premium”
Reuters reporting pointed to optimism around potential peace talks as a key driver, with markets weighing the possibility that sanctions pressure on Russian oil could ease over time—adding to global supply availability. [4]
The Financial Times also framed the move as a market repricing around a potential deal (while warning that investors may be moving ahead of hard outcomes). [5]
2) China macro data is reviving demand anxiety
Reuters cited weak China data—including slower factory output and softer retail-sales growth—as another factor weighing on crude, reinforcing the idea that demand growth is vulnerable at a time when supply is plentiful. [6]
3) Oversupply is the bigger backdrop investors can’t ignore
Even without a geopolitical thaw, multiple reports today emphasized a market already wrestling with surplus conditions. Barron’s noted that oil has fallen sharply over the past six months, with record U.S. production among the supply-side factors shaping the downturn and expectations for a large 2026 surplus. [7]
China is still buying crude—but it’s stockpiling, not signaling a demand boom
One wrinkle in today’s oil narrative: Reuters reported that China accelerated crude stockpiling in November, with imports running ahead of refinery runs and surplus barrels flowing into inventories—helped by weakening global prices and discounted barrels. [8]
For U.S.-listed energy stocks, this is a mixed signal:
- Bullish angle: stockpiling can support imports even if end-demand is soft.
- Bearish angle: when the marginal demand is inventory builds rather than consumption, it can fade quickly if prices stop falling—or if storage fills.
Natural gas is sliding too—adding pressure to the broader energy complex
It isn’t just oil. Reuters reporting on U.S. natural gas noted futures dipping to a multi-week low as milder weather forecasts reduce heating demand expectations, while record output and ample storage keep the supply cushion thick (with LNG feedgas near record highs). [9]
That matters for U.S. energy equities because it hits parts of the market that don’t move one-for-one with oil—especially gas-heavy producers and midstream operators leveraged to gas volumes and sentiment.
Why refiners are falling even though crude is cheaper
In theory, lower crude can be a tailwind for refiners if product prices hold up and crack spreads widen. But today’s tape looks more like a “demand and price-complex” selloff than a simple input-cost benefit.
Barron’s highlighted gasoline prices falling toward multi-year lows, consistent with a market that’s pricing in abundant supply and softer demand dynamics across the barrel. [10]
That backdrop helps explain why MPC, PSX, and VLO are getting hit alongside upstream names today.
Forecasts investors are watching: where oil prices could land in 2026
Today’s selloff in energy stocks is also being fueled by the direction of “next-year math”—and the latest official projections are not supportive.
EIA’s baseline: Brent around $55 in early 2026
The U.S. Energy Information Administration’s Short-Term Energy Outlook (released Dec. 9, 2025) expects global inventories to rise through 2026 and forecasts Brent averaging $55/bbl in Q1 2026, staying near that level through next year (while also noting OPEC+ policy and China inventory builds as potential stabilizers). [11]
IEA / market framing: large surplus risk remains
The Financial Times cited the International Energy Agency’s view pointing to a sizable 2026 surplus and emphasized that the market is already under pressure from oversupply concerns. [12]
Barron’s similarly referenced expectations for a very large 2026 surplus environment. [13]
In practical stock-market terms: when the commodity forward curve and official agency outlooks move lower together, it tends to compress valuation multiples across upstream and services—even before earnings estimates fully reset.
Deal flow to watch: a $6 billion bid in U.S. natural gas
One notable U.S. gas-focused corporate headline today: Axios reported that Kimmeridge proposed a $6 billion cash acquisition of Ascent Resources, emerging amid a legal battle involving Ascent’s ownership structure and competing proposals. [14]
Even though Ascent is private, it’s a useful datapoint for public-market investors: it signals that strategic buyers and private capital still see value in long-lived U.S. gas assets—even as near-term gas pricing and public energy equities weaken.
What happens next: the catalysts energy investors are watching into the close
With energy stocks tracking the commodity tape closely today, the next moves likely hinge on three fast-moving variables:
- Peace-talk headlines and sanctions expectations (risk premium can evaporate quickly—or reappear just as fast). [15]
- China demand signals vs. inventory behavior (stockpiling can support imports, but it’s not the same as end-user strength). [16]
- Macro/rates narrative (energy is underperforming in a market still repricing growth, inflation, and the 2026 rate path). [17]
Bottom line
As of early afternoon on Dec. 16, 2025, the U.S. energy sector is decisively risk-off: crude is breaking down, natural gas is soft, and investors are leaning into a 2026 oversupply narrative that pressures earnings power across upstream and services—while refiners aren’t getting a “cheap crude” bid because the broader fuel complex is weakening too. [18]
Market prices are intraday and can change quickly; this article is informational and not investment advice.
References
1. www.reuters.com, 2. www.reuters.com, 3. www.reuters.com, 4. www.reuters.com, 5. www.ft.com, 6. www.reuters.com, 7. www.barrons.com, 8. www.reuters.com, 9. www.tradingview.com, 10. www.barrons.com, 11. www.eia.gov, 12. www.ft.com, 13. www.barrons.com, 14. www.axios.com, 15. www.reuters.com, 16. www.reuters.com, 17. www.reuters.com, 18. www.reuters.com


