NEW YORK, July 29, 2026, 15:59 EDT
- TeraWulf dropped 11.9% to $15.05 in late trading, approaching its session low.
- Shares in four listed miner-to-AI peers declined by an average of 13.2%. Bitcoin edged down 0.4%.
- The current preliminary Zacks consensus projects a quarterly per-share loss of $0.20.
TeraWulf Inc. NASDAQ:WULF fell 11.9% to $15.05 in late trade on Wednesday. The stock hovered close to its session low ahead of the market close.
Bitcoin slipped just 0.4% over the same period. The divergence indicates that investors are primarily viewing TeraWulf as an AI-infrastructure project developer.
The stock traded in line with firms repurposing power sites as data centres.
| Company or asset | Late-trading move |
|---|---|
| TeraWulf NASDAQ:WULF | -11.9% |
| IREN Ltd. NASDAQ:IREN | -13.6% |
| Cipher Digital Inc. NASDAQ:CIFR | -13.5% |
| Core Scientific Inc. NASDAQ:CORZ | -12.6% |
| Applied Digital Corp. NASDAQ:APLD | -13.1% |
| CoreWeave Inc. NASDAQ:CRWV | -8.6% |
| Bitcoin | -0.4% |
The four ex-miner counterparts posted an average decline of 13.2%. TeraWulf outpaced them by roughly 1.3 percentage points, yet lagged CoreWeave by 3.4 points.
TeraWulf’s shift places it in that intermediate spot. The company is no longer solely focused on bitcoin, though its main AI initiatives will take years to build.
Technology shares faced a broad downturn. The PHLX semiconductor index fell 2.2% as concerns rose about the pace of AI-related spending. The Federal Reserve kept interest rates steady between 3.50% and 3.75%, while three policymakers backed a rate hike.
The investor-relations website for TeraWulf displayed no recent operational updates on Wednesday. The most current item was still the July 22 alert regarding its August 5 earnings call. This suggests the drop is linked to sector trends instead of new company-specific developments.
An investor’s key consideration is whether contract rates adequately offset construction delays. The Anthropic deal announced by TeraWulf features higher reported revenue per megawatt compared to its prior Fluidstack arrangement.
| Contract and customer | Critical IT load | Initial term | Contracted revenue | Revenue per MW-year | Planned delivery |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hawesville — Anthropic | 401 MW | 20 years | About $19 billion | About $2.37 million | From late 2027 until early 2028 |
| Lake Mariner — Fluidstack | More than 360 MW | 10 years | About $6.7 billion | No more than $1.86 million | Staggered through 2026 |
The method uses reported revenue, dividing it by megawatts and the length of the initial contracts. With this approach, Anthropic’s payment per MW-year is at least 27% higher.
This is not a comparison of profits. The contracts vary in terms of capital costs, annual escalations, services, and power agreements.
Chief Executive Paul Prager stated the Anthropic deal “validates our strategy.” But rental payments will start solely once TeraWulf provides the capacity. The initial phase is set for the latter half of 2027. SEC
The postponement is significant. Increased contract prices support the backlog, yet they do not generate immediate cash flow. Revenue scheduled far in the future is also worth less when expected investment returns increase.
The following operational test is scheduled for August 5. Early Zacks consensus forecasts predict second-quarter revenue of $44.71 million, representing a 6.2% decline compared to the previous year. Analyst projections indicate a loss of $0.20 per share.
Revenue for the first quarter reached $34.0 million. High-performance computing leases generated $21.0 million, making up roughly 62% of the total figure. TeraWulf disclosed $3.1 billion in cash and restricted cash.
Investors are set to monitor Lake Mariner delivery timelines and the start of leases. These numbers will indicate if present revenue aligns with the contracted backlog.
Risks: New York’s July 14 directive may halt unfinished state permit requests for data centres drawing 50 megawatts or more. The specific project impact has not been determined. Other ongoing risks include costs for construction, access to funding, power supply, and possible delivery setbacks.
Currently, TeraWulf is seen more as a leveraged AI play than a proxy for bitcoin. The August 5 update needs to demonstrate a shift from committed megawatts to operational, revenue-generating capacity.
